A popular myth exposed.
From John Ransom
One of the of the most popularized predicted effects of global warming from the models given us by the climate change clowns, increased hurricane and tropical storm activity, has recently been shown to be without merit according to the science and operations officer of the National Hurricane Center, Dr. Chris Landsea.
In a work published in late November and carefully labeled an “opinion” piece on the site for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - which is quick to distance itself from the conclusions reached by Landsea, who makes very clear that he subscribes to the theory man of man-made global warming- concludes that “the overall impact of global warming on hurricanes is currently negligible and likely to remain quite tiny even a century from now.”
In the rarefied atmosphere of climate politics this is enough to get you labled as a "climate skeptic," perhaps enough to get you excommunicated as a "climate denier." Landsea resigned from the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2005 because he felt it had become politicized and was ignoring the science.
Yet somehow he remains the leading hurricane expert in the US, despite his "shoddy" science.
Landsea attacked three specific datasets that are often used by global warming alarmists to show that the warming of the earth will have terrible consequences for human-kind: 1) the frequency of storms; 2) the intensity of storms and; 3) the economic damage of storms.
Read the rest here.
Heard at a discussion last night, “We cannot predict the impact of hurricanes but we can predict global warming because of melting ice caps”
Woa. So aside from the post hoc fallacy, such a comment implies that storms are not part of, or are isolated from, the atmosphere or weather. This just goes to show how environmentalism, thanks to complicit mainstream media, has mangled people’s logic and transformed the public’s mentality into a political religion.
No comments:
Post a Comment