Policymakers easily change tunes especially when faced with fickle political exigencies
ECB’s President Jean-Claude Trichet, once a reluctant inflationist, will join the US in resorting to ‘open arms’ inflationism.
From the Bloomberg, (bold emphasis mine)
European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet said threats to the euro region have worsened and inflation risks have eased, giving officials the option to take further action should the debt crisis worsen.
The economy faces “particularly high uncertainty and intensified downside risks,” Trichet said at a press conference in Frankfurt today after the ECB left its benchmark rate at 1.5 percent. While monetary policy is still “accommodative,” financing conditions have worsened in parts of the 17-member euro region and the ECB stands ready to pump more cash into markets if needed, he said.
The Bank of England recently refrained from extending credit easing (QE) programs, this could be temporary.
From another article from Bloomberg, (bold emphasis mine)
Bank of England officials resisted calls to extend economic stimulus as they attempt to navigate a path between accelerating inflation and a faltering recovery.
The nine-member Monetary Policy Committee, led by Mervyn King, maintained the target of its bond program at 200 billion pounds ($320 billion), as forecast by all but one of 41 economists in a Bloomberg News survey. It also held the benchmark interest rate at a record-low 0.5 percent today, as predicted by all 57 economists in a separate poll. The pound rose against the dollar after the announcement.
Central banks are refocusing on bolstering growth, with the Bank of Canada saying yesterday there is a “diminished” need for it to raise rates and Sweden’s Riksbank abandoning a planned tightening. While two U.K. policy makers who were calling for rate increases dropped that position last month, the Bank of England may be reluctant to do more so-called quantitative easing with inflation more than double its target.
Again my view is that central bankers appear to be looking for justifications to employ the increasingly unpopular QE programs.
However as shown above, some of the hardliner’s stance can easily give way when confronted by the prospects of a reemergent crisis.
For political authorities, an adapted political stance have mostly been symbolical. For the public hardwired to expect actions from these authorities, it would be politically difficult or unpopular not give in, as crisis can instantaneously change popular perception. Put differently, an aura of desperation can shift what seems unpopular today to become popular tomorrow, and thus political actions can be as capricious as political sentiment.
Yet given the predilection towards QE policies, analysts at Morgan Stanley speculate that a Plaza Accord 2.0 will likely be the course of action for global central bankers.
From Barrons, (bold emphasis mine)
Is a Plaza Accord 2.0 ahead? Some 26 years ago this month, the major industrialized nations hatched a plan to lower the dollar and unleash a wave of liquidity that raised global equity markets in the mid-1980s. Could it happen again?
Yes, say Joachim Fels, Manor Pradhan and Spyros Andreopolous, who head Morgan Stanley's global economics. In a report released Wednesday, they write that monetary authorities of the developed economies -- the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan and the Bank of England -- could react to "weak growth and soggy asset markets" with coordinated easing.
In addition, they note that surprise easing moves by leading emerging-market economies, Brazil and Turkey, would complement the process. And while the Morgan Stanley team doesn't mention it explicitly, the Swiss National Bank's decision to peg the Swiss franc to the euro also would be consistent with an internationally coordinated easing move.
In my view, competitive devaluation has not only been happening, but has been intensifying. Although coordination may only be part of the story, perhaps applied to Western and developed economy central banks. Nevertheless the path towards policy harmonization could be in the works as proposed.
Yet I’m not sure about the effects of a global concerted and coordinated devaluation.
Although one thing seems certain: This policy addiction or obsession to debauch or destroy the currency serves as THE reason to own gold.
No comments:
Post a Comment