Warren Buffett used to be the person I wanted to emulate. Not anymore.
This is because Warren Buffett’s investment approach has radically changed. He has undergone dramatic transformation from a Graham-Dodd modeled value investor to a political entrepreneur-crony capitalist.
The Huffington Post writes, (bold highlights mine)
No matter what the government does, taxpayer bailouts of the financial sector will sometimes be necessary, according to the nation's second richest man.
As markets crashed in the fall of 2008, government officials feared that if certain financial institutions failed, the entire financial system -- or perhaps even the entire economy -- would come down with them. In the months after the government extended a $700 billion bailout to the financial sector, lawmakers have striven to ensure that no institution poses such a systemic risk that it would be too big, or too interconnected, to be allowed to fail.
But famed investor Warren Buffett, whose own firm profited handsomely from the bailout, said bailouts are an inevitable feature of finance, Bloomberg reports.
Buffett, who is personally worth at least $45 billion, told the government panel charged with investigating the causes of the financial crisis that its work would not prevent the phenomenon of "too big to fail."
Reading last night’s very timely article at Mises.org, Frank Chodorov wrote of how some capitalists have contributed to the advancement of socialism.
Mr. Chodorov wrote, (bold highlights mine)
The task of producing goods and services for exchange was accepted as a necessity, but the summum bonum was the acquisition from the king of grants, patents and subsidies that would yield them monopoly profits, that is, profits over and above what might be garnered in a competitive market. Their aim was to live like nobles who rendered no service for the rents they collected from their tenants.
It appears that such “rent seeking paradigm” seems to be Mr. Buffett’s newfound specialty.
Warren Buffett’s perceived “bailout-as-a-necessity” is due to the fact that he or his company profits from these. Yet, what is beneficial for him comes at the expense of ordinary people. Bailouts are basically redistribution of wealth from the average Americans to Mr. Buffett, his company and shareholders.
Nonetheless bailouts are not inevitable. Eventually a political economic system that persists in doing so will only degenerate. And this will likewise affect his company’s profits overtime.
Besides, bailouts or political concessions depend on patronage. Once Mr. Buffett’s political network has gone out of the loop then such privilege goes out of the window as well.
So instead of looking for economic opportunities to exploit on, Mr. Buffett and his executives will be focusing on lobbying.
This only goes to show how Mr. Buffett’s the time horizon has substantially narrowed. Maybe it’s because of age.
But Mr. Buffett has certainly been a disappointment, unlike his libertarian father, a staunch defender of the “old right”, Howard Buffett.
No comments:
Post a Comment