Chart of the Day: Kim Jong il’s Heritage: North Korea’s Earth Hour from Poverty

North Korea has been one country that has practiced what environmentalists celebrate as “Earth Hour”. I have earlier posted this.

Seen from a satellite photo, while South Korea has been prominently lighted at night (lower portion), North Korea stands in the dark (upper portion) where the only place lit is that of the palace of Mr. Kim. [yeah equality]

But there is a fundamental difference.

The North Korean exercise has not been designed to fulfill environmental preservation goals but has been driven by dire poverty…

This can be seen by the above chart from Reason and Washington Post

Writes the Washington Post

During the early 1970s, North Korea’s economy stagnated, with GDP per capita flatlining until Kim Il Sung’s death. Then, in 1994, after Kim Jong Il took over, the economy started shrinking noticeably, per capita incomes fell, and the country became dependent on emergency U.N. food aid to stave off famines that had already killed as many as 3 million people. North Korea became, as Eberstadt puts it, “the world’s first and only industrialized economy to lose the capacity to feed itself.” (That said, there’s evidence that North Koreaw as growing weakly in the last few years of Kim Jong Il’s rule).

At the moment, North Korea’s per capita income is less than 5 percent of the South’s. As the Atlantic Council’s Peter Beck puts it, “Each year the dollar value of South Korea’s GDP expansion equals the entire North Korean economy.”

Overall I see several lessons

The thrust of most environmental politics has been directed at atavistic policies, or attempts to retrogress world conditions similar to the medieval times or to one of absolute poverty (ala North Korea).

Second, there is no exemplary way to achieve atavism than to adapt the paragon of statism/socialism/communism—Kim Jong il version. In North Korea almost everyone is equally poor and equally without lights, except the political leaders.

Third, the concrete evidence of attaining economic prosperity can be seen in the diametric paths of governance undertaken by two Koreas: South Korea’s capitalism or market economy vis-à-vis Kim Jong il’s brand of statism/socialism/communism.

Yet bizarrely, many fantasize about having successful economic development by the taking on the latter’s path.