Mounting Global Financial Instability, The UK Pension Industry Bailout; Entrenching Forces of Inflation

 Mounting Global Financial Instability, The UK Pension Industry Bailout; Entrenching Forces of Inflation 

 

The speed of the plunging currencies of China, Japan, and Europe (or the surging USD) makes the world vulnerable to a sudden stop and subsequently, a crisis. 

 

That was from this author last week.  

 

Are the following recent events the proverbial writing on the wall? (bold added) 

 

Euronews/Reuters, September 21: LONDON -The Bank of England stepped into Britain’s bond market to stem a market rout, pledging to buy around 65 billion pounds ($69 billion) of long-dated gilts after the new government’s tax cut plans triggered the biggest sell-off in decades. Citing potential risks to the stability of the financial system, the BoE also delayed on Wednesday the start of a programme to sell down its 838 billion pounds ($891 billion) of government bond holdings, which had been due to begin next week. “Were dysfunction in this market to continue or worsen, there would be a material risk to UK financial stability,” the BoE said. “This would lead to an unwarranted tightening of financing conditions and a reduction of the flow of credit to the real economy.” 

 

Financial Times, September 29: A pension meltdown forced the Bank of England to intervene in gilt markets on Wednesday. Executives told the Financial Times that markets barely dodged a Lehman-Brothers-like collapse – but this time with your mum’s pension at the centre of the drama. Problems with “pension plumbing” are what caused the mess. The culprit is said to be a popular pension strategy called liability-driven investing, or LDI. Leverage is a key element of many LDI strategies, and are basically a way pension funds can look like they’re an annuity without making the full capital commitment of becoming one.  

As one would note, the developing market tumult starts with malinvestments funded by extensive leveraging, which are all products of the zero-bound rate or "easy money" regime and financial engineering. 

 

In the ten years through 2020, reports have indicated the UK pension industry's liabilities through their exposure to Liability Driven Investing (LDI) hedging strategies have tripled to £1.5 trillion ($1.7TN)!   

  

The industry's massive exposure to fixed income, derivatives, repos, and other forms of securitizations through leveraging made them increasingly fragile to extreme market volatility.  Thus, the sharp drop in bond prices and the sterling forced the industry to face a chain of collateral and margin calls, compelling the frantic and intense liquidations to raise cash! 

  

And with liquidity rapidly drying up, the Bank of England (BoE) attempted to stanch the bleeding with an incredible policy U-turn from the initial plan of Quantitative Tightening (reducing balance sheet) to Quantitative Easing (expansion again)!  Or, to infuse liquidity, it will buy instead of selling bonds.  

 

But there is no free lunch. 

 

Such subsidies have sent the UK's credit default swaps (CDS) to pandemic highs! 

 

And instead of pruning its assets, the BoE's balance sheet will rise further or remain at ALL-Time highs. 

 

And as liquidity in the treasury markets has been swiftly depleting, not only in the UK but in other major European sovereigns, including the US, sooner or later, these nations may also mimic the BoE. 

 

For the same reasons, South Korean authorities have floated to the public its intent to buy bonds. 

 

Xinhua, September 28: South Korea's finance ministry and the central bank said Wednesday that they will buy back government bonds later this week to tackle soaring bond yields. Senior officials from the Ministry of Economy and Finance, the Bank of Korea (BOK) and financial regulators had a meeting to deal with the recent volatility surge in the financial market. The finance ministry decided to buy back 2 trillion won (1.4 billion U.S. dollars) worth of government bonds on Friday, while the BOK will purchase Treasury bonds worth 3 trillion won (2.1 billion dollars) from the market Thursday. (bold added) 

 

So while many central banks may still be hiking, the unfolding events may prompt them to reconsider their present actions.  

 

They may slow or stop rate hikes altogether while reopening the tap of asset purchases for liquidity injections.  

 

Global financial markets have responded violently to the slight trimming of central bank assets of the Fed, ECB and BoJ, indicating the embedded fragility. 

 

And the more chaotic the events, the greater the likelihood that central banks may elect towards a 'pivot.' 

Yet, the other options authorities are likely to impose are a chain of interventions and eventual controls: currency or FX, capital, price and wage, trade, border/mobility, and even people. 

 

Let us cite some recent instances. 

 

The Bank of Japan (BoJ) reportedly exhausted some USD 19.6 billion in September to intervene in the currency market to support its currency, the yen. 

 

In support of the USD-Hong Kong peg, the Bangkok Post and SCMP reported a few days ago that the Hong Kong Monetary Authority intervened "in the market 32 times this year, buying a total of HK$215.035 billion and selling US$27.39 billion amid persistent capital outflows. Its current intervention has surpassed in size measures taken to support the weak Hong Kong dollar during the last interest-rate rise cycle when it bought HKcopy03.48 billion in 2018 and HK$22.13 billion in 2019." 

 

Taiwanese officials initially floated the idea of FX and a ban on short sales. Later, they denied this. 

 

Interventions to prop up domestic currencies have led to substantial declines in the US Treasury holdings of global central banks. 

 

Finally, as the energy crunch sweeps into Europe, member states have already embarked on bailing out consumers and producers. 

 

Yahoo/Bloomberg, September 21: Germany and the UK announced energy bailouts to avoid an economic collapse and take the sting out of soaring prices, with European governments spending 500 billion euros ($496 billion) by one estimate to help consumers and businesses…The bailouts announced in Berlin and London coincide with fresh estimates from the Bruegel think-tank that the total spend by European nations on easing the energy crisis for households and businesses is nearing 500 billion euros. The European Union’s 27 member states have so far earmarked 314 billion, not including other major spending like nationalization plans, it said 

 

Winter is coming, and we can only guess that the bailouts will intensify. 

 

So how will European authorities finance this, given the current climate? 

 

For these reasons, "inflation" would only become structurally embedded as the path-dependent stance of policymakers remains in favor of inflating the system. 

 

And yet one of the immediate backlashes from these bailouts is the developing fissure among member states of the Eurozone. 

 

But even if central banks "pivot," such conditions are unlikely to fuel the return of TINA. 

 

There is much to deal with, but we can't cover them at once. 

USD-PHP Hits Eleven Year High! The Government’s Ambitious Infrastructure Projects Should Aggravate on the Peso’s Predicaments

The USD-Php beat the Phisix to a new record.

Up .5%, the USD-Php soared to 50.47 a level last reached in September 2006, or an ELEVEN year high!

Among Asian contemporaries, the USD-Php was the strongest again this week (peso weakest)

The domestic currency’s weakness has been more than the USD. It has been weak against a broad spectrum of currencies.

 

Among the currency majors, with the exception of the Japanese yen, the Philippine peso has attenuated against the euro, pound and the yuan over the past year (upper charts). The yen has risen against the pesoin January but has traded rangebound since May. (But the yen-php remains up on a year-to-date basis)

Including all the components of the Bloomberg Dollar index (BBDXY), the Philippine peso has diminished against the Mexican peso, the Australian dollar, and the Swiss franc. The Canadian dollar has only recently spiked against the peso. Though the Brazilian real rose against the peso in the first two months of the year, such gains have dissipated. Or the peso has gained only against the real year-to-date. The real’s weakness has largely been due to corruption scandal that has surfaced to plague Brazil’s new administration.

The peso has condescended even against the ASEAN neighbors, namely the ringgit, baht and rupiah (lower window).

Despite the much ballyhooed G-R-O-W-T-H mantra, the broad spectrum of the peso’s weakness has been amazing.

Contrary to the public wisdom, the sustained softening of the peso entails that the demand for the peso (and peso related assets) continues to wane.

Moreover, while there has been a surfeit of domestic liquidity, there appears to be increasing scarcity in the context of USD liquidity in the domestic financial system.

And while local experts fixate on the FED’s “hawkishness” the international counterparts have raised the issue of USD flows in terms of remittances and of trade deficits. Hardly has there been any meaningful discussion on relative supply side factors.

On remittances. Unless much of the domestic population will be sent overseas, the law of diminishing returns will continue to dominate remittance dynamics predicated on the sheer scale of OFWs and overseas migrant workers.

Additionally, incomes of OFWs and immigrants depend or are leveraged on the global economy. With global debt at a staggering US $217 trillion or 325% of GDP in 2016(!), the burden of debt servicing will hardly generate enough room for investments and therefore provide the necessary fulcrum for growth dynamics. Furthermore, since much of these debts had been used to finance overcapacity, the latter will also serve as obstacles to real economic growth. Both these factors parlay into constricted demand.

Moreover, increased risks of protectionism and political aversion to migrants will likely serve as added hurdles to increased overseas deployment. Given these factors, remittance growth should be expected to grow incrementally, stagnate or even decline.

This brings us to trade deficits.  The government proposes an aggressive infrastructure spending program to the tune of Php 8 to 8.4 trillion over the tenure of the incumbent administration (2017-2022).

To put in perspective the scale of the proposed spending, 2016’s NGDP was at Php 14.5 trillion. The personal savings as of May was Php 4.09 trillion. Total resources of the financial system as of April totaled Php 17.4 trillion with banking system’s resources at Php 14.142 trillion. This means that that the proposed infrastructure spending program would equal 55% of NGDP, 195% of personal savings and 46% of the financial system’s resources. And that’s just infrastructure alone.

Since the government’s massive infrastructure spending alone will compete and eventually “crowd out” the private sector on resources and on financing, these most likely will lead to even bigger trade deficits (greater imports than exports). With insufficient dollar flows from remittances and from foreign investments (as consequence of “crowding out”), the government’s current dollar liquidity predicament will likely intensify. The government will most likely finance such liquidity shortages with more borrowing from both local and international sources of USDs, the BSP will probably increase its usage of derivatives “forward cover” and possibly resort to access of currency swaps with other central banks.

So the government will not just be borrowing to finance its ambitious spending programs, it will also expand its leverage on the USD for liquidity purposes. At the end of the day, increasing dollar indebtedness would redound to magnified “US dollar shorts”.  

And while popular politics remain fixated on free lunch funded pipe dreams, raging global asset markets may have been forcing global central banks to have second thoughts on the continued provision of easy money.

Fed officials as Ms. Janet Yellen warned last week of expensive price valuations. San Francisco Fed John Williams said the stock market "seems to be running very much on fumes" and that he was "somewhat concerned about the complacency in the market." (Bloomberg)

Ms. Yellen’s vice chair, Stanley Fisher “pointed to higher asset prices as well as increased vulnerabilities for both household and corporate borrowers in warning against complacency when gauging the safety of the global financial system.” (Bloomberg)

The Bank of England “ordered banks to hold more capital as consumer debt surges” (The Guardian) while its governor Mark Carney gave the case of raising interest rates (Marketwatch)

European Central Bank’s Mario Draghi hinted that tapering of QE may be in the offing by saying “deflationary forces had been replaced by reflationary ones”.

Mr. Draghi’s statement sparked massive selloffs in bonds, and a huge spike in the euro!

ECB officials tried to downplay Mr. Draghi’s statement to no avail.

The Swedish Central Bank is widely expected to ditch its easing bias next week.

Last weekend, prior to the spate of hints by central banks, the Bank for International Settlements, the central bank of central banks, urged major central banks to press ahead with interest rate increases (Reuters)

And with major central banks signaling a concerted tightening, it’s a wonder how the Philippine government can be able to finance their proposed grandiose project.  

Aside from domestic USD liquidity issues, if the BSP continues to maintain current historic subsidies in the face of global tightening, the peso will depreciate further. Monetary subsidies include the RECORD lowest interest rate and the RECORD monetization of National government debt which went up by 8.9% in May 2017 from April’s 4.3%.

But if the BSP raises its rates to align with actions of the other major central banks, then just what happens to the much touted aggressive infrastructure spending projects?

Oh by the way, I noted in early June that the BSP has imposed a tacit tightening through a pullback in the monetization of national government’s debt. (Oh My, Has the BSP Commenced on Tightening??? June 4, 2017).

Apparently, the slowing domestic liquidity growth (11.3% in May) has percolated to impact consumer (+23.6%) and industry loan (+17.6%) growth too (lower window).

Nevertheless, the BSP seemed to have used QE (Php 31.783 billion) anew this May to finance the National Government May’s fiscal deficit (Php 33.421 billion). The doubling of growth rate has similarly reflected on M3.

Getting hooked to debt monetization translates to a policy of devaluation.

Oh, before I close, here is a SHOCKING quote of the day from Ms. Yellen (Reuters, June 27, 2017)

U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen said on Tuesday that she does not believe that there will be another financial crisis for at least as long as she lives, thanks largely to reforms of the banking system since the 2007-09 crash.

"Would I say there will never, ever be another financial crisis?" Yellen said at a question-and-answer event in London.

"You know probably that would be going too far but I do think we're much safer and I hope that it will not be in our lifetimes and I don't believe it will be," she said.

Writing on the wall?