Like other tyrannies, the tyranny of the majority was at first, and is still vulgarly, held in dread, chiefly as operating through the acts of the public authorities. But reflecting persons perceived that when society is itself the tyrant—society collectively, over the separate individuals who compose it—its means of tyrannizing are not restricted to the acts which it may do by the hands of its political functionaries. Society can and does execute its own mandates: and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it practises a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself. Protection, therefore, against the tyranny of the magistrate is not enough: there needs protection also against the tyranny of the prevailing opinion and feeling; against the tendency of society to impose, by other means than civil penalties, its own ideas and practices as rules of conduct on those who dissent from them; to fetter the development, and, if possible, prevent the formation, of any individuality not in harmony with its ways, and compel all characters to fashion themselves upon the model of its own. There is a limit to the legitimate interference of collective opinion with individual independence: and to find that limit, and maintain it against encroachment, is as indispensable to a good condition of human affairs, as protection against political despotism.
The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate hut at the longer effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups—Henry Hazlitt
Thursday, January 30, 2014
Quote of the Day: Protection against the tyranny of the prevailing opinion and feeling
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Black Swan Problem: Not All Markets Are Down!
When we hear experts generalize that global markets are in bearish territory as means to give emphasis to their deflationary theme, we understand this as a Black Swan Dilemma.
While it is true that MOST markets are in the red or even in bear market territory (defined as in 20% decline), it isn't true that all markets are suffering losses or even in bear markets.
This great chart from Bespoke Invest...
To add, some countries as Bostwana, Venezuela, Costa Rica, Lebanon and Morocco are down year to date but LESS than 10%-which doesn't technically bring them into bear markets.
We understand Bespoke's chart as computed based on local currency figures.
Of course no bourse can beat Zimbabwe's turbocharged performance, from All Africa.com (all highlights mine),
``The feat continued into 2008 with industrials posting a year-to-date growth of 960 quadrillion percent, which is 4,15 billion times as much as July's annual inflation of 231 million percent.
``The resource index is up 444 quadrillion percent since January. And so, from the look of things, ZSE investors may have indeed managed to hedge their assets against the effects of high inflation but some have been at a loss in US dollar terms."
As a reminder, Zimbabwe's market has been up on local currency terms but is significantly down in US dollar terms. The seemingly fantastic rise reflects the impact of hyperinflation to its asset prices, as Zimbabweans seek shelter in the stock market from a collapsing currency.