A few days back I wrote about Kazakhstan’s surprisingly huge devaluation despite what mainstream would see as strong statistical data.
As one would realize, Kazakhstan’s dilemma has not been revealed by the current and trade balances but on her currency tenga, forex reserves, external debt and importantly M3. And another thing, given the 19% devaluation, this shows that the alleged low inflation figures have also been patently inaccurate.
Well my suspicion seems right, the devaluation exposed on Kazakhstan’s debt problems via a run on three banks
From EuroAsianet.org
Kazakhstan’s central bank is appealing for calm as rumors that some financial institutions are in trouble following last week’s currency devaluation have provoked a run on three banks.On February 19 the National Bank sent text messages to the public urging people to disregard the “false information” and not succumb to panic.“All Kazakhstani banks have sufficient funds in national and foreign currency,” the messages read; people should not submit to “provocations” and “keep calm.”Large queues formed at some banks in the financial capital, Almaty, for a second day on February 19 as customers rush to withdraw funds, fearing a bank collapse.
Media and officials blame it on rumors.
But logic tells us that if the banking system stands on a firm ground then they wouldn’t be vulnerable to rumors.
The reason banks are prone to runs aside from Kazakhstan’s existing debt problems has been the roots of the monetary system: central bank fractional reserve banking standard.
"The answer lies in the nature of our banking system", writes the great dean of Austrian economics Murray N. Rothbard, that’s because “they have far less cash on hand than there are demand claims to cash outstanding.”
Professor Rothbard further explains:
This means that the depositor who thinks he has $10,000 in a bank is misled; in a proportionate sense, there is only, say, $1,000 or less there. And yet, both the checking depositor and the savings depositor think that they can withdraw their money at any time on demand. Obviously, such a system, which is considered fraud when practiced by other businesses, rests on a confidence trick: that is, it can only work so long as the bulk of depositors do not catch on to the scare and try to get their money out. The confidence is essential, and also misguided. That is why once the public catches on, and bank runs begin, they are irresistible and cannot be stopped.
Given the recent bank run Thailand, it has been interesting to see what seems as increasing frequency of bank runs in emerging markets or failing financial institutions such as in China.
More signs that emerging markets could be the modern day version of "subprime".
We live in very interesting times