USD Peso Stages Breakaway Run! Correction Due; Global Liquidity Conditions, Like Deutsche Bank and Euro Money Market’s Dilemma will Play a Role

The Philippine peso was clobbered this week by 1.06% for the fifth consecutive week of losses. The USD phpclosed at 48.50 for the week.

The peso presently owns the tiara as Asia’s worst performing currency on a week on week (top) basis, as well as, year to date basis.

Malaysia’s ringgit has been the second runner-up for the week, while the peso has supplanted the Chinese yuan as tailender on a year to date basis.

 

In my view, the sharp vertical uptick of the USD php has now reached severely overbought levels and could be bound for material contraction or Newton’s law.

But since the currency markets have the tendency to be more volatile, thus Newton’s law may not be as effective as they apply to stocks. But they still apply.

History shows the way.

Over the past three years or since 2013, the USD php has spiked FOUR times.

The biggest vertical move occurred during the taper tantrum where the USD peso soared 7.4% in one monthand two weeks. Newton’s law has not appeared here.

The second leg of the USD php run had another 5.5% vertical run (on top of the 7.4%). It was here where Newton’s law emerged to erase all the gains of the second leg

But the gains from the first leg had virtually been unscathed or untouched.

Newton’s law only took the froth off the second leg but maintained the gains of the first leg which served as a staging point for the third leg.

The third leg was during the 3Q of 2015 where the USD php surged by 4%. Newton’s law reemerged but didn’t take back all of the gains.

That’s because the USD php crawled back to hit a high of 47.995 last January 26 in harmony with the downturn in global markets.

When global central banks went on a full-scale rescue of the stock market via the Shanghai accord where negative rates were implemented, this coincided with the BSP’s unleashing of the stimulus, so along with local stocks, the peso rallied.

But unlike stocks which rebounded furiously, the peso’s ascent had virtually been capped.

As I have noted here, the inverse correlation between the peso and stocks seem to have been broken. It’s only recently where the correlation seems to have been resurrected.

Present events signify as the fourth leg of the USD php upside trend. As of Friday’s close at Php 48.5, this serves as a BREAKAWAY run from the January 26 high.

Such breakaway run makes the USD php at 50 (November 2008 high) a visible horizon.

That’s most likely a target AFTER the USD corrects or sloughs off some of its overbought conditions.

Interestingly, from the close of 2012, the USD php has delivered 18.1% in returns, over the same period the Phisix generated 31.2%.

So the Phisix massively outclassed the USD php. But if I am right those fortunes will soon reverse.

Prices of exchange rates are fundamentally a product of demand and supply.

The surge in USD php has presently been from greater demand for the USD than the peso.

As I have previously observed, this may be a knee-jerk reaction, there may be a real run on the peso, and finally, the peso has been used as a political weapon by geopolitical forces.

Yet this has been happening ironically in the face of reported record GIRs

The BSP also reported its August banking system’s loan conditions as well as the liquidity conditions last week. While the bank loan growth remains substantially elevated (at 4Q 2014 levels), fascinatingly, money supply M3 has sharply decelerated to 11.8% from 13.1%.

It is as if lots of bank borrowers have stopped spending. So the funds that they have borrowed may have been used to hoard cash, pay down debt or buy USD.

And a sustained fall in M3 will likely translate to a downside trajectory for NGDP and nominal sales.

Yet even at 11.8% money supply growth remains a rapid clip. This shows the longer term supply influence of the peso to the exchange rate

 

Another curiosity, growth of government’s external debt plunged to 2.68% last August from the 6-8% range it registered during the past 9 months. Has the government raised sufficient taxes, as well as USD dollars last August enough to cover its deficits last July?

Or has the present improvement been part of the PR campaign to embellish statistics to bolster the peso and the economy’s conditions?

Lastly, not everything will be about the domestic conditions. Global factors will increasingly come into the picture.

The unfolding banking crisis in Europe will also play a big role.

So as with the surging LIBOR and TED spreads in the US (largely blamed to 2a7 reforms), the untamed China’s interbank rate Shibor, and the still ongoing problems Japan’s banking system, as well as, Saudi Arabia’s liquidity problems

It took rumors that Deutsche Bank reached a settlement with the US justice department worth $5.4 billion in fines which have been  far lower than the original $14 billion to stem the collapse in share prices last week.

Because of the massive short positions on Deutsche Bank’s shares, the rumor impelled for an intense short covering which lifted global stocks on Friday. DB soared 14.02% last Friday where the market cap was last at $17.7 billion (yahoo Finance).

And because of a holiday in Germany in Monday, regulators have become so sensitive to any potential liquidity squeezes for them to float temporary responses.

Like Wells Fargo, several employees at the Deutsche Bank have also been charged by the Italian government for creating false accounts. So aside from financial woes, impropriety will partly play a role in the coming sessions.

Rumors have been floated that DB will be rescued, but German’s media says that the German governmentwon’t do this. A bailout by the German government would set a precedent for Italian government to bailout its besieged banks, which the German government has stridently opposed. In my view, further stress in the market will force their hands. But whether the bailouts or bailins will be successful is another matter.

And anent the lingering bank and financial concerns, it’s not just DB, Germany’s second-largest bank Commerzbank announced that it would cut dividends and slash 9,600 jobs. Netherland’s largest lender, theING will also announce job cuts this week. So even banks in creditor nations of Europe are being affected.

Incidentally, USD liquidity conditions have been stretched out at the money markets in Europe such that the cost to borrow USD via cross currency swaps has risen to 2012 levels. And it’s not just in Europe, hedging cost for the USD yen also via cross currency swaps have experienced a “blowout”. These are signs of USD shortages.

The ongoing liquidity shortages have become apparent such that the Saudi Arabian government had to inject $5.3 billion into the banking system to tame surging interest rates and contain stress in her currency, the riyal. 

As the chart from the Alhambra Partners shows, the surge in US TED spread has mirrored (inverse) DB’s share prices (along with many other price signals including treasury fails) way back to 2014.

As the prolific analyst and research manager Jeffrey Snider wrote:

While attention is rightly focused on Deutsche Bank it is only so because the bank is the most visible symptom being the most vulnerable participant in this “something.” DB is just an outbreak so prominent that the mainstream can no longer pretend there is nothing worth reporting – but they can still obscure why that might be, focusing on the canard about the DOJ settlement. This is a systemic issue, one that is as plain as Deutsche’s stock price.

Liquidity risk is indicated pretty much everywhere, a direct assault not just on mainstream conventions about monetary policy but monetary competency itself.

Use any weakness in the USD to accumulate.

Video: The Power of the Undervalued $10 Trillion Informal Economy

Author Robert Neuwirth of Stealth of Nations: The Global Rise of the Informal Economy makes a great talk at the TED anent the vastly underrated informal or shadow economy

The TED introduces Mr. Neuwirth for his "out-of-the-box" thinking, or as challenging

“the conventional thinking by examining the world's informal economy close up. To do so, he spent four years living and working with street vendors and gray marketers, to capture its scope, its vigor--and its lessons. He calls it “System D” and argues that it is not a hidden economy, but a very visible, growing, effective one, fostering entrepreneurship and representing 1.8 billion jobs worldwide.

Mises Institute’s Jeff Riggenbach quotes Mr. Neuwirth’s definition of the informal economy based on his book…

This "informal economy," he writes, "produces, cumulatively, a huge amount of wealth.… It is how much of the world survives, and how many people thrive." And he has a name for it: System D.

"System D," he quickly explains, “is a slang phrase pirated from French-speaking Africa and the Caribbean. The French have a word that they often use to describe particularly effective and motivated people. They call them débrouillards. To say a man (or woman) is a débrouillard(e) is to tell people how resourceful and ingenious he or she is. The former French colonies have sculpted this word to their own social and economic reality. They say that inventive, self-starting, entrepreneurial merchants who are doing business on their own, without registering or being regulated by the bureaucracy and, for the most part, without paying taxes, are part of 'l'economie de la débrouillardise.' Or, sweetened for street use, 'Systeme D.' Thisessentially translates as the ingenuity economy, the economy of improvisation and self-reliance, the do-it-yourself or DIY economy.

The video from TED Ideas Worth Spreading (hat tip Professor Mark Perry)

Some highlights:

-“Something like this is totally open, it’s right there for you to find. All of this is happening openly and above board there is nothing underground about it. It is our prejudgment that it is underground”

-Governments dislike this

-“We are all focused on the luxury economy” ($1.5 trillion per year)

-“It excludes two-third of the workers of the world, 1.8 billion people work in an economy that is unregulated and informal”

-It is where employment is

-It engenders a more egalitarian world

In reality, the so called “prejudgment” of the informal economy has been part of orchestrated government campaign propaganda to derogate them, for the simple reason that the existence of the informal economy diminishes the importance of the role of governments.

More significantly, the informal economy represents the stark account of government failure

As John Sullivan of the Huffington Post writes,

The informal sector -- those businesses and entrepreneurs who work outside of the formal market economy -- is huge and largely undocumented in most developing economies. Almost everywhere, the root cause is the same: cumbersome, unresponsive, unfair, and overwhelmingly status quo-driven bureaucracy. People simply cannot get through the wall of red tape or the maze of regulations to gain access to the formal economy.

Moreover, author Robert Neuwirth points to the survivorship bias by public of focusing on the “luxury” economy (euphemism for consumption economy) which has been much smaller than the informal economy.

Again this represents the indoctrination by the mouthpieces of government conduits particularly through mainstream media.

Take the Philippines, hardly any serious study dwells with the informal economy. Every news exaggerates on the contributions of OFWs to the economy whose remittances accounts about 10% more or less of the economy.

When it comes to the informal economy, even when we deal with them or see them daily as a fact of life, they become a vacuum in mainstream’s eyes

The following excerpt is an example of one distorted perspective relative to OFW’s contribution to property development, the Global Property guide writes,

Overseas Filipinos’ remittances are powering the low-end to mid-range residential property market. They are snapping up housing projects and mid-scale subdivisions in regions near Metro Manila such as Cavite, Batangas and Laguna Provinces, while the expansion of the upper residential market, including the luxury market, is due to increased housing demand from BPO employees and expatriates, according to the World Bank.

Overseas Filipino Workers (OFW).account for around 17% to 18% of residential sales of Ayala Land, one of the country’s major developers. In the next five years Ayala Land President Antonio Aquino expects to double this, by branching out to the affordable and low-end market segment.

If OFWs account for say 20% of the housing or property demand, so what happened to the 80%? Which is mathematically bigger 20% or 80%? Since when has 20% become a dominant factor?

Let me add that OFWs also contributes to the informal economy, that is if the recipient families engage in unregulated or untaxed commerce.

This is why I have been repeatedly pointing out that for a country, whom according to mainstream has supposedly been living in Third World and has been allegedly 'poor', the Philippines hosts three of the largest malls in the world (Forbes 2008). Yet these malls, have not been like those ghost malls in China, as they have near full occupancy (which means profitable retail enterprises)

Further, the thrust of mall development in the Philippines has been spreading to the rural area which I recently argued, as suggesting of the deepening role of decentralization and of signs of the plateauing or the reversal of urbanization.

All these can HARDLY be supported by consumption spending by OFWs alone (or even if you add exports, which has been the favorite source of Keynesian influenced media).

The fact is that the informal economy has far been a larger contributor to the Philippines’ economic growth than has been projected.

Remember since the informal economy has been largely undocumented thus statistical estimates will bear significant errors.

Despite the survivalship bias practiced by the mainstream, Mr. Neuwirth’s putting into perspective of the real state and of the potentials of the informal economy appears to have been indirectly acknowledged by the World Bank,

the shadow economy has reached a remarkably large size with a weighted (unweighted) average value of 17.2 (33.1)% of official GDP. However, equally important is the clear negative trend of the size of the shadow economy over time. The unweighted average size of the 162 countries decreased from 34.0% of official GDP in 1999 to 31.0% in 2007; for the 21 transition countries from 36.9% in 1999 to 32.6% in 2007.

While the World Bank says the trend has been slowing, this has, I think, has mostly been a result of recent trends of globalization and economic freedom which tend to increase participation of the some erstwhile segments of the informal sector to the formal sector.

But such dynamics should not be construed as past performance determining future outcome. If the informal or shadow economy has signified as the public’s response to the politicization of the markets, then increased politicization means the tendency to shift economic activities towards the informal sector.

A quote from this Forbes article nails it…

“These are not really people oppressed by poverty,” says writer Stewart Brand. “They are getting out of poverty as fast as they can.” This isn’t to say that cellphones are about to save the world. But they have become the tool of choice for people who are determined to save themselves.

The informal economy, thereby represents free trade in motion and has been about people’s natural recourse to survival.

As the distinguished Austrian economist Percy Greaves Jr. once said,

For men, life is a series of choices by which we seek to exchange something we have for something we prefer. We know what we prefer. No other man or bureaucrat is capable of telling us what we prefer. Our preferences are our values. They provide us with a compass by which we steer all our purposeful actions. Because few people fully understand this, we have some serious economic problems…

Anything that raises cost or hinders the free and voluntary transactions of the market place must keep human satisfactions from reaching their highest potential. Today the greatest obstructions to the attainment of higher human satisfactions are the well-meaning but futile political interferences with the mutually beneficial transactions of a free market economy.

So any obstacles placed against activities which facilitates people’s survival will intuitively lead to the informal economy.

This is common sense.

Unfortunately common sense has been unavailable to politically brainwashed mindsets.