The Political Economy of Corruption: How Social Democracy Became the Engine of Decay

 

In a world of uncertainty, no one knows the correct answer to the problems we confront and no one therefore can, in effect, maximize profits.  The society that permits the maximum generation of trials will be the most likely to solve problems through time (a familiar argument of Hayek, 1960).  Adaptive efficiency, therefore, provides the incentives to encourage the development of decentralized decision-making processes that will allow societies to maximize the efforts required to explore alternative ways of solving problems—Douglass North 

In this issue

The Political Economy of Corruption: How Social Democracy Became the Engine of Decay 

Part I: How Social Democracy Sows the Seeds of Corruption

IA. Corruption Starts with the Electoral Process

IB. Public Choice Theory and Barangay Projects: Microcosm of the National Rent Machine

IC. A Caveat: Between System and Choice

ID. Dynasties, and the Patron–Client Trap, From Adaptive to Extractive Efficiency

IE. Goodhart’s Law and the Metric Illusion: Governance by the Numbers

IF. The Limited Access Orders: Elite Stability Through Controlled Competition

IG. The Financialization of Patronage

IH. Ochlocratic Democracy and the Squid Game Parable

II. The Tragic Paradox of Philippine Social Democracy

Part II: The Political Economy of Corruption

IIA. The Pandora’s Box of Public Spending

IIB. The Fiscal Mirage: Bigger Budgets, Shrinking Revenues

IIC. The Economic Undercurrent: A Slowdown Beneath the Noise

IID. The Policy Backlash: Easy Money Meets Fiscal Decay

IIE. The Mirage of Deficit-to-GDP Ratio: When Optics Replace Substance

IIF. The Mirage of Prudence: Debt, Deception, and the Ochlocratic State

Part III: Conclusion: The Final Drift: From Rent-Seeking to Crisis 

The Political Economy of Corruption: How Social Democracy Became the Engine of Decay 

From ballot to budget, the Philippine political economy drifted from progress to patronage—where fiscal populism and elite collusion sustain the illusion of democracy 

Part I: How Social Democracy Sows the Seeds of Corruption 

IA. Corruption Starts with the Electoral Process

Figure 1

Corruption begins not in backroom deals—but at the ballot box. 

How much does a candidate spend to get elected? 

While formal spending limits exist under law, field estimates and media-monitoring data reveal that actual campaign expenditures, especially at the national level, reach hundreds of millions to billions of pesos. In urban settings, Barangay officials reportedly spend upwards of Php 500,000, city councilors tens of millions, and candidates for national seats billions. (Figure 1) (see reference) 

Given their modest stipends, what motivates them and their backers to pour in such vast sums? Patriotism? Or the expectation of returns—through power, access, and extraction? 

IB. Public Choice Theory and Barangay Projects: Microcosm of the National Rent Machine 

Here, Public Choice Theory—or as the late Economist James Buchanan artfully defined it—"politics without romance," strips away the illusion of altruistic politics. (see reference) 

Elections, far from being contests of ideals, are investments in rent-seeking. Politicians rationally pursue interventions—public works, subsidies, welfare programs—that expand budgets and open opportunities for returns. 

Barangay officials, for instance, may build health centers or basketball courts to tout “accomplishments,” while pocketing funds through overpricing, commissions, or other channels within their networks. 

At the grassroots, popular barangay projects—covered courts, health stations, road repairs—serve dual purposes: visible service and invisible extraction. These projects justify budget allocations while enabling leakage through padded contracts and favored suppliers. The barangay becomes a microcosm of the national rent machine. 

That is, the larger the government’s footprint, the larger the potential rents.

Fiscal expansion is often framed as developmental necessity. In reality, it’s a mechanism for rent distribution. More projects mean more contracts, more intermediaries, more leakage—and most importantly, more VOTES.

Politicians push for interventions not to solve problems, but to create extractive opportunities and extend their tenure.

IC. A Caveat: Between System and Choice

As a caveat, while the seeds of corruption are sown in the electoral system—where incentives reward control, manipulation, and extraction through patron–client ties and dependency-building programs—individual agency still matters. Not all who enter the system succumb to its temptations.

We must resist the fallacy of division: the idea that because the system is corrupt, every actor within it must be. While many—or even most—may exploit the structure, others attempt to navigate it with integrity, often at great personal and political cost.

Moreover, corruption is not monolithic. Its degree, visibility, and method vary:

• At the barangay level, corruption may be more modest—petty overpricing, padded logistics, or informal commissions.
• At the national level, it scales. Many officials may not directly pocket funds from projects. Instead, some exploit indirect mechanisms—through layered corporate networks, proxy ownerships, and business interests within their jurisdictions.

In such cases, transparency tools like the SALN (Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth)—while symbolically important—often remain cosmetic. They measure disclosure, not control. As such, they are easily gamed, rarely enforced, and structurally blind to the artifice of legally structured beneficial ownership. 

ID. Dynasties, and the Patron–Client Trap, From Adaptive to Extractive Efficiency

Over time, this incentive structure breeds dynastic entrenchment. Voters become dependent on welfare, contracts, and subsidies—reinforcing the very system that sustains them.

Political families consolidate control over access to state resources, while bureaucracies serve as vehicles for loyalty rather than performance.

Here, Douglass North’s concept of adaptive efficiency becomes central. In healthy societies, innovation and problem-solving emerge through decentralized experimentation—allowing multiple actors to test ideas and learn over time.

But in a captured social democracy, decision-making becomes centralized, risk-averse, and politically motivated.

Instead of adaptive efficiency, the system evolves toward extractive efficiency—maximizing rent extraction rather than problem-solving. Every “reform” becomes another opportunity for patronage. 

IE. Goodhart’s Law and the Metric Illusion: Governance by the Numbers 

When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure. 

Goodhart’s Law explains why governance quality erodes: once developmental indicators—poverty reduction, infrastructure spending, digitalization—become political targets, they cease to measure real progress.

Politicians and bureaucracies chase metrics, not meaning. Budgets swell to create the optics of success, even as institutional capacity stagnates. 

Despite headline growth, nearly half of Filipino families still identify as poor, and hunger rates remain stubbornly high—underscoring the dissonance between GDP triumphalism and lived reality. 

The logic of numbers has replaced the logic of outcomes. For instance, infrastructure becomes a scoreboard; social amelioration, a campaign metric. 

What cannot be measured—quality of life—disappears from governance priorities. 

IF. The Limited Access Orders: Elite Stability Through Controlled Competition 

North, Wallis, and Weingast’s framework of Limited Access Orders capture this equilibrium. In such systems, elites maintain stability by controlling access to political and economic privileges. Violence is contained not through rule of law, but through negotiated rents among dominant coalitions. 

Competition—whether electoral or market—is not eliminated, but managed to prevent instability. 

In the Philippine context, the political economy resembles a cartel: quasi-competition among elites crowds out MSMEs through the BSP’s easy-money regime and the regulatory state. 

Access to capital, permits, and protection is rationed—not by merit, but by proximity to power. 

The ruling oligarchy—masquerading as democratic elites—justifies this concentration through the promise of trickle-down prosperity. Anchored on a record-high savings-investment gap, the benefits rarely diffuse. They consolidate, reinforcing privilege and power. 

Corruption, then, is not a malfunction. It is the stabilizing mechanism of the political order. Public works and welfare programs distribute rents downward to maintain consent, and upward to preserve privilege. 

IG. The Financialization of Patronage 

The BSP’s easy-money regime acts as the lubricant of this system. Cheap credit, monetized deficits, and liquidity injections sustain the illusion of prosperity. Fiscal populism flourishes, financing both vote-buying and elite projects under the banner of “inclusive growth.”

Figure 2

Yet as public debt expands (Php 17.468 trillion in August) and private credit is crowded out (Bank compliance of MSME lending share 4.59%), efficiency dissipates, innovation recedes, and systemic risk mounts. (Figure 2, upper image)

The same elites who dominate politics now dominate finance—transforming competition into collusion. What began as political capture of budgets has evolved into financial capture of capital. Bank’s net claims on central government (NCoCG) reached Php 5.445 trillion or 31% of public debt, last August. (Figure 2, lower graph)

However, elite finance no longer thrives on production, but on asset transfers anchored in debt—rent extraction by other means.

IH. Ochlocratic Democracy and the Squid Game Parable

Social democracy becomes a shell—democratic in ritual, oligarchic in practice. Elections legitimize extraction. The state grows as both employer and benefactor. Bureaucracies serve dynasties. Welfare becomes vote collateral.

Philippine politics drifts toward ochlocracy—where collective dependency replaces civic reason, and politics becomes an auction of favors.

In the popular Korean drama Squid Game, participants vote democratically on whether to continue the deadly contest. It’s a grim parody of ochlocratic democracy—where the masses “choose” within a system they cannot change, while elites watch from above, entertained by their struggle.

Philippine politics mirrors this cruel symmetry: voters play the game of elections, but the rules—and the rewards—belong to the few who own the arena.

This is the tragedy of ochlocratic democracy: people mistake participation for power, and choice for change.

II. The Tragic Paradox of Philippine Social Democracy

The paradox is tragic. Social democracy began as an ideal of empowerment, but its penchant for populist collectivism and institutional capture devolved into systemic dependency. It rewards extraction over experimentation, and loyalty over learning and entrepreneurship.

As North warned, prosperity depends not on good intentions or efficient markets, but on institutions that foster experimentation, decentralization, and accountability. When these vanish, societies lose their adaptive capacity—and settle into the stability of decay. 

That decay now finds fiscal expression. 

The controversial 2025 national budget, packed with pork-laden projects, confidential allocations, and populist welfare programs, does not represent governance—it exposes social democracy’s rent-distribution paradigm.

It is the modern stage of our own Squid Game democracy: grand spending justified by social ideals, yet orchestrated to consolidate power. The next step forward is not reform in name, but reckoning in structure.

Part II: The Political Economy of Corruption

IIA. The Pandora’s Box of Public Spending 

The opening of the public spending Pandora’s Box exposes the government’s MIDAS touch—except that what it touches doesn’t turn into gold but corruption. From overpricing to kickbacks, bribery to ghost projects, and more, allegations of improprieties have emerged not only in flood control programs but also across farm-to-market roads, election platforms, healthcare centers, the DICT’s WiFi subscription services, LTO license plates, and more yet to come. 

The iceberg unravels. 

We recently wrote: 

Authorities hope for three things: 

• That time will dull public anger
• That the probe’s outcome satisfies public appetite
• That new controversies bury the scandal

But history warns us: corruption follows a Whac-a-Mole dynamic—until it hits a tipping point.

Here is what we missed. 

In a striking inversion of democratic logic, the Philippine Navy’s recent warning—that public outrage over flood control failures may expose the nation to foreign propaganda—reveals a deeper institutional reflex: the impulse to reframe civic dissent as geopolitical vulnerability. 

The narrative is shifting: from corruption to propaganda, from domestic failure to foreign destabilization. In this alchemy of blame, scandal becomes sovereignty, and criticism becomes treason. 

The Thirty-Six Stratagems offer an apt lens: “Let the enemy’s own spy sow discord in his own camp.” When power is cornered, it conjures enemies to restore cohesion—sowing the seeds of conflict, via diversion, to preserve its own survival. 

By invoking the specter of foreign interference, the regime deflects attention from systemic rot to imagined threats, weaponizing patriotism against dissent. 

Yet one must ask: is the Philippine military also attempting to obscure internal corruption within its own agency? 

IIB. The Fiscal Mirage: Bigger Budgets, Shrinking Revenues

Figure 3

Despite the domino trail of corruption being exposed, political authorities recently passed the 2026 budget of Php 6.793 trillion—up from this year’s enacted Php 6.326 trillion. Though this marks a 7.4% increase, it rose by Php 467 billion from last year, the fourth highest ever. (Figure 3, topmost chart) 

The House of Representatives even increased its allocation by Php 10 billion. 

However, the Bureau of the Treasury quietly revised the 2025 expenditure target downward—from Php 6.326 trillion to Php 6.082 trillion—likely after realizing it had overestimated non-tax revenue projections. 

All things equal, this translates to an 11.7% increase or ₱711 billion, the largest peso expansion in Philippine fiscal history. 

While actual spending this year may fall below the enacted budget, history suggests it will still exceed the revised target. 

In any case, because corruption is often framed in binary terms—black or white, good or evil—the 2026 budget signals that the establishment expects the scandal to breeze over and the good times to continue. 

This echoes Aldous Huxley’s warning:

That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons of history. 

IIC. The Economic Undercurrent: A Slowdown Beneath the Noise 

While the September Php 248.1 billion deficit was reported as having narrowed from last year—due to a 7.5% decline in expenditures amid DPWH embroilment— few noted that public revenues also fell by 5.99%. 

Yes, tax revenues grew: BIR up 4.74% YoY, BoC up 5.25%. But non-tax revenues collapsed by 65.8%. 

The quarterly and year-to-date numbers reveal a broader slowdown: (Figure and Table 3, middle and lower windows) 

Q3 2025: -3.22% revenues, +4.47% tax revenues (BIR +4.87%, BoC +3.297%), non-tax -48.24%

Q3 2024: +16.95% revenues, +11.7% tax revenues (BIR +14.7%, BoC +3.61%), non-tax +61.7%

9M 2025: +2.2% revenues, +8.6% tax revenues (BIR +10.9%, BoC +1.6%), non-tax -34.7%

9M 2024: +16.04% revenues, +10.6% tax revenues (BIR +12.73%, BoC +4.6%), non-tax +62.85% 

The bottom line: where revenues are conditioned on economic performance and administrative capacity, the Q3 slowdown signals deeper economic weakening—dragging down the 9M performance. The GDP leads tax collections. 

Yet, the public barely realizes that the economy is tacitly emaciating, while the corruption scandal, which partly curtailed spending, exacerbates the decline.

Figure 4

Despite the September contraction in public spending, 9M YoY growth slipped from 11.6% in 2024 to 5.2% in 2025. Still, public spending hit an all-time high of Php 4.484 trillion. Figure 4, topmost visual) 

As a result, the 9-month deficit swelled to Php 1.117 trillion—just 1.92% or Php 21.85 billion shy of the historic Php 1.139 trillion budget gap during the pandemic recession year of 2021 —an astounding fiscal gap without a recession. (Figure 4, middle diagram) 

A massive pandemic-sized fiscal backstop without a crisis—what is the government not telling the public? 

IID. The Policy Backlash: Easy Money Meets Fiscal Decay 

One might add: all this unfolds amid the BSP’s easing cycle—marked by interest rate and RRR cuts, plus a doubling of deposit insurance. 

All told, the economy now reels from the unintended consequences of overlapping policies:

• Bank-financed asset bubbles,
• Crowding-out of private credit,
• The soft USD-peg, and
• Implicit backstops for bank balance sheets. 

Together, these reinforce malinvestments that distort both fiscal and monetary stability. 

Once again, from our September post (bold original): 

Many large firms are structurally tied to public projects, and the economy’s current momentum leans heavily on credit-fueled activity rather than organic productivity. 

Curtailing infrastructure outlays, even temporarily, risks puncturing GDP optics and exposing the private sector’s underlying weakness. 

Or if infrastructure spending is curtailed or delayed, growth slows and tax revenues fall—VAT, corporate, and income tax collections all weaken when economic activity contracts. 

This means the deficit doesn’t necessarily shrink despite spending restraint; the “fiscal hole” may, in fact, widen—imperiling fiscal stability and setting the stage for a potential fiscal shock. 

The irony is stark: efforts to contain corruption by tightening spending could deepen the very gap they aim to close.

This means that an extended softening of GDP entails a much higher deficit-to-GDP ratio—recently adjusted to 5.5% for 2025.

Crucially, few realize that further slippage in this ratio amplifies the risk of a fiscal shock—a scenario no longer theoretical but increasingly imminent.

IIE. The Mirage of Deficit-to-GDP Ratio: When Optics Replace Substance 

Yet what policymakers increasingly celebrate as "fiscal discipline" may in fact be a statistical mirage. 

The narrowing of the deficit-to-GDP ratio, often paraded as proof of resilience, conceals deeper structural decay beneath the surface. (Figure 4, lowest chart) 

For while nominal figures appear stable, the underlying engine of growth—real production, capital formation, and household income—has been hollowing out. The economy’s apparent balance is not born of strength, but of accounting illusion. 

The obsession with deficit-to-GDP optics reveals how politicians and bureaucrats chase statistical benchmarks—or what I call as ‘benchmark-ism’—over structural integrity. As the ratio falls—even while real GDP softens—authorities infer that deeper deficits carry little cost. 

Numerically, the ratio implies GDP is outperforming the deficit, either through faster nominal growth or slower deficit expansion. But this dissonance masks a dangerous illusion: debt-financed deficits now comprise a substantial and growing share of GDP. 

The economy’s rising dependency on public spending, funded by mounting debt, creates a fragile equilibrium. 

Once the extraction and redistribution mechanism weakens—manifesting as a sharp GDP decline—the ratio could spike violently. 

In all, the falling deficit-to-GDP ratio conceals the economy’s eroding capacity to absorb and repay debt. It’s not a sign of resilience, but a warning of latent fragility. 

IIF. The Mirage of Prudence: Debt, Deception, and the Ochlocratic State 

This leads us to debt. 

Media and authorities entertain us with a dramatic 71.1% plunge in BSP-approved FX borrowings in Q3 2025, projecting an image of fiscal prudence and stability. 

Officials attribute the slowdown to the “frontloading” of offshore financing earlier in the year. 

Yet BSP approved $12.28 billion in the first 9 months of 2025—up 16.1% from $10.58 billion in the same period last year. For context, BSP approved $13.8 billion for the full year 2024. 

What they fail to highlight is that the Q3 deficit—among the largest on record—pushed the 9-month shortfall to 2021 levels. This demands financing. The data suggests BSP either shifted operations through banks, reclassified borrowings via accounting gymnastics, or pivoted to peso-denominated debt.

Figure 5

What BSP’s data shows supports this view. In August, banks’ net foreign assets surged 45% year-on-year, while the BSP’s claims rose by a mere 0.7%. This divergence indicates a clear shift in FX borrowing and asset buildup from the BSP and national government toward the banking sector. (Figure 5, topmost graph) 

In effect, external leverage didn’t disappear—it was privatized, migrating into bank balance sheets where it escapes fiscal scrutiny but magnifies systemic risk. 

However, financing did slow in September, marking a second consecutive decline. This pulled 9-month financing back to 2024 levels, implying a slowdown in national debt growth—even as deficits soared past last year’s. Again, this hints at rescheduling maneuvers or creative fiscal accounting. (Figure 5, middle pane) 

We saw a similar pattern with amortization. Media and consensus proudly cited a debt financing slowdown in 1H 2025. But analyzing the June deficit, we surmised in August that this reflected one or more of the following: Scheduling choices, prepayments in 2024 and political aversion to public backlash 

Amortizations resurfaced by August, and September data reinforced the rebound. 

More strikingly, interest payments surged 15.4% in September, pushing their 9-month share of expenditures to 14.85%—the highest since 2009. (Figure 5, lowest graph)

Figure 6

Combined, amortization and interest payments in the first 9 months of 2025 already exceed 2023’s annual totals and sit just 7.5% below 2024’s all-time high— with a full quarter remaining! (Figure 6, upper chart) 

Meanwhile, foreign-denominated debt servicing fell 35% in September—its fourth straight monthly decline and the largest yet. This pulled its 9-month share of total debt servicing down from 21.04% in 2024 to 19.7% in 2025. (Figure 6, lower image) 

What’s apparent is a deliberate effort to paint macro stability by suppressing FX loan exposure. 

But in doing so, even if a fiscal shock doesn’t erupt in 2025, its shadow has: the pullback in FX loans weakens BSP’s structural defenses for its ‘soft peg’ regime. 

Finally, while we view the deficit-to-GDP ratio as a flawed metric, its relevance to consensus sentiment remains. A shock could send USD/PHP soaring, stocks plummeting, inflation spiking, rates rocketing and the economy stumbling—a chain reaction born of fiscal manipulation disguised as discipline. 

Part III: Conclusion: The Final Drift: From Rent-Seeking to Crisis 

The current flood control scandal reaffirms the lessons of the EDSA I and II Revolutions: corruption is not a binary, black-and-white event underwritten by good or bad ethics, but a symptom of a broader, deeper, and entrenched political-economic pathology called social democracy—where elections are treated as opportunities to gain both political capital and economic power through tenure-based rent-seeking. 

Thus, the systemic drift deepens toward free lunch policies—protecting the interests of a privileged few, while masking them as welfare interventions for the many. These “trickle-down” redistributions, in practice, breed dependence and disincentivize productivity. 

Intervention begets intervention, as every maladjustment and distortion calls forth another. 

As of this writing, the Philippine leadership has ordered a 50% cut in construction material prices while previously imposing both price ceilings on rice (MSRP and the “20-peso rollout”), and recently, price floors on palay farmgate prices.

Each measure deepens the drift toward centralization or socialism. 

The entropic consequences of the ochlocratic–social democratic regime are now manifesting even in embellished government data—suggesting that worsening conditions can no longer be shielded by the gaming and manipulation of marketplace and statistics (GDP, CPI, fiscal deficit, and debt among the most politically sensitive). 

The more the state intervenes to sustain the illusion of stability, the faster its underlying contradictions compound. 

The emergence of deeply seated corruption amid an ongoing economic slowdown exposes not only the late-cycle phase transition—but also Kindleberger’s drift toward the age of swindles, fraud, and defalcation. 

In the end, because both political and economic structures are ideological and self-reinforcing, reform from within is improbable. 

The deepening economic and financial imbalances will not resolve through policy, but will ventilate through a crisis—again the lessons of the post-1983 debt restructuring of EDSA I and the post-Asian Financial Crisis of EDSA II. 

____ 

References 

Based on legal caps under RA 8370 and RA 7166 and independent estimates (PCIJ, Inquirer, SunStar), actual campaign spending in competitive areas far exceeds statutory limits.

Prudent Investor Newsletters, The Philippine Flood Control Scandal: Systemic Failure and Central Bank Complicity, Substack, October 05, 2025 

Prudent Investor Newsletters, When Free Lunch Politics Meets Fiscal Reality: Lessons from the DPWH Flood Control Scandal, Substack, September 07, 2025 

Prudent Investor Newsletters, June 2025 Deficit: A Countdown to Fiscal Shock, Substack, August 03, 2025

 

When Free Lunch Politics Meets Fiscal Reality: Lessons from the DPWH Flood Control Scandal

 

Democratic socialism—thereby fusing populist authorization with bureaucratic command—inverts civil society’s logic: spontaneous coordination yields to electoral control, property, and precedent to administrative discretion. The quest for legibility breeds discretion, opacity, colonizing associations, and politicizing provision. The polity grows more ceremonially majoritarian as its structure turns illiberal. Human relations become increasingly politicized. The space for autonomous and dissenting freedom steadily recedes—Vibhu Vikramaditya 

In this issue: 

When Free Lunch Politics Meets Fiscal Reality: Lessons from the DPWH Flood Control Scandal

I. Selective Framing: The "Smallest Deficit" Headline

II. Bigger Picture: Weak Revenues, Sluggish Spending, Cumulative Deficit Near Record Highs

III. Quietly Moving the Goalposts, Budget Gaps: Enacted vs. Revised

IV. Interventionist Mindset: The Root of the Fiscal Imbalance

V. The Economics of "Free Lunch" Politics: The Law of Scarcity Meets the Welfare State

VI. Debt Dynamics and the Savings–Investment Gap

VII Corruption as Symptom, Not Cause

VIII. Public Spending at Historic Highs and the DPWH Flood Control Scandal

IX. The DPWH Scandal: A Systemic Threat

X. A Policy Dilemma: The Impossible Choice 

When Free Lunch Politics Meets Fiscal Reality: Lessons from the DPWH Flood Control Scandal 

What the DPWH scandal reveals about the fragility of a spending‑driven political economic order

I. Selective Framing: The "Smallest Deficit" Headline 

Inquirer.net, August 29, 2025: A modest increase in government spending narrowed the Philippines’ budget deficit in July to its smallest level in nearly five years, keeping the shortfall within the Marcos administration’s target. The state continued to spend more than it collected after recording a fiscal deficit of P18.9 billion, albeit smaller by 34.42 percent compared with a year ago, latest data from the Bureau of the Treasury showed.

Figure 1

The July budget deficit headline—“smallest in nearly five years”—is a textbook case of selective framing. 

While technically accurate, it obscures deeper fiscal concerns by exploiting the optics of quarterly VAT reporting, which front-loads revenue at the start of each quarter. Since 2023, firms have filed VAT returns quarterly instead of monthly, so revenues at the start of each quarter appear inflated, producing artificial “surpluses” or unusually slim deficits. (as discussed last year, see reference) [Figure 1, upper image] 

This makes July look exceptional, but it is little more than a timing quirk—not a sign of genuine fiscal improvement.

II. Bigger Picture: Weak Revenues, Sluggish Spending, Cumulative Deficit Near Record Highs 

In reality, the cumulative January–July shortfall has ballooned to Php 784.4 billion, the second-largest on record. [Figure 1, lower chart] 

Revenues grew by only 3.26% while expenditures posted a meager 1.02% increase. The Bureau of the Treasury itself attributed the spending slowdown to the "timing of big-ticket disbursements of the Department of Public Works and Highways, Department of Social Welfare and Development, and Department of National Defense for their respective banner programs." 

Year-to-July, expenditures are up 8.2%, slower than 13.2% in 2024, but the bigger story lies in revenue weakness: collections grew just 4.8% this year compared with 14.75% in 2024. The 24.9% contraction in non-tax intake and the sharp deceleration in Bureau of Customs growth (1.5% vs. 5.8% in 2024) dragged overall revenues down. 

III. Quietly Moving the Goalposts, Budget Gaps: Enacted vs. Revised 

July’s Php 491.2 billion in expenditures also fell sharply below the Php 561 billion monthly average needed to meet the Php 6.326 trillion enacted budget. 

Figure 2

Compounding this, the Bureau of the Treasury reported that 2025 fiscal targets had been revised downward (by the DBCC) for both revenue and spending, now pegged at Php 6.08 trillion. [Figure 2, upper table] 

Authorities attributed the adjustment to "heightened global uncertainties," but the subtext is clear: the government is quietly recalibrating expectations to preserve its 5.5% deficit ceiling, even as structural weaknesses deepen. The headline may offer comfort, but the underlying trajectory points to fragility, not fiscal strength. 

The enacted budget sets the ceiling—what government aims to spend—while the revised budget marks the floor, revealing what it can realistically afford as conditions shift. 

Yet the jury is still out on whether the current administration will break its six-year trend of exceeding the enacted budget—or whether this implicit admission of slower growth will instead spur even more spending in the second half of the year. 

IV. Interventionist Mindset: The Root of the Fiscal Imbalance 

Of course, the fiscal imbalance is merely a symptom. 

As previously discussed, it is driven by behavioral factors—such as the heuristics of recency bias and overconfidence—combined with an overreliance on a technocratic bureaucracy fixated on flawed econometrics as the fountainhead of interventions. (see reference on our previous post dealing with the rising risks of a Fiscal Shock) 

Most importantly, it is fueled by a populace increasingly dependent on social democracy’s "free lunch" politics, anchored in a deepening interventionist mindset. 

As Mises Institute’s Joshua Mawhorter lucidly describes, "by living under a modern, highly interventionist modern nation-state, the default paradigm of political elites and the general public is that, whenever a problem arises, the government must do something, that not doing something would be irresponsible and disastrous, that it can only help, and that the worst possible option would be doing nothing. This might be called the interventionist mindset or interventionist paradigm." (bold added)

V. The Economics of "Free Lunch" Politics: The Law of Scarcity Meets the Welfare State 

This mindset lays the policy framework for trickle-down Keynesian spending programs financed by the BSP’s easy money. 

Public spending on an ever-widening scope of social services—including the proposed "universal healthcare" for all Filipinos—illustrates this. [Figure 2, lower left image] 

In simple terms, while such programs may appear ideal, the law of scarcity dictates that there must be sufficient savings to sustain a welfare state. 

If the rate of redistribution exceeds the growth of savings, funding must come from elsewhere—either by borrowing from future taxpayers or through the inflation tax, via financial repression and fiscal dominance enabled and facilitated by central bank accommodation. 

Yet a persistent reliance on borrowing or inflation is not sustainable. Both are subject to ‘reversion to the mean’ and will eventually face a reckoning through crisis.

VI. Debt Dynamics and the Savings–Investment Gap 

The thing is, while some authorities acknowledge the burden of public debt—"every Filipino now owes P142,000"—most attribute it to "corruption," a convenient strawman. [Figure 2, lower right picture]

Figure 3

Alongside rising expenditures, public debt surged to a record Php 17.56 trillion last July, sustaining its upward trajectory and accelerating in both scale and velocity! MoM changes depict this uptrend. [Figure 3, topmost and center graphs] 

All told, the Philippines suffers from a record savings–investment gap, which hit a new high in Q2 2025. [Figure 3, lowest chart] 

But "savings" in national accounts is a residual GDP-derived figure that is deeply flawed; it even includes government "savings" such as retained surpluses and depreciation, when in reality, the fiscal deficit reflects dissaving (as discussed during CMEPA last July; see reference). 

With public debt up Php 296.2 billion month-on-month, Php 1.873 trillion year-on-year, and Php 1.512 trillion year-to-date, the government is suggesting a forthcoming decline in public debt by the end of 2025. 

Technically, while a ‘slowdown’ may occur, this is a red herring—it omits the fact that soaring deficit spending inevitably translates into higher debt, higher inflation, or both.

VII Corruption as Symptom, Not Cause 

Social democrats fail to heed the lessons of EDSA I and EDSA II: corruption is a legacy of big government. 

What is often forgotten is that corruption is not the disease but a symptom of vote-buying politics—of a system built on free-lunch populism, where political spending buys loyalty, entrenches dependence, transfers wealth, consumes savings, and simultaneously erodes institutions through ever-deepening interventions. 

Per the great Frédéric Bastiat, 

"When plunder has become a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." (Bastiat, 1848) 

Still, social democrats cling to the illusion that electing an "angel" leader can deliver an ideal command-and-control economy. They overlook that forced redistribution—or legalized plunder—breeds societal tensions and unintended consequences, triggering a vicious cycle of interventions and power concentration —exactly what Tocqueville warned against when he said absolute power corrupts absolutely. 

Again, Bastiat reminds us: 

"legal plunder may be exercised in an infinite multitude of ways. Hence come an infinite multitude of plans for organization; tariffs, protection, perquisites, gratuities, encouragements, progressive taxation, free public education, right to work, right to profit, right to wages, right to assistance, right to instruments of labor, gratuity of credit, etc., etc. And it is all these plans, taken as a whole, with what they have in common, legal plunder, that takes the name of socialism." (Bastiat, 1850) 

The bigger the government, the greater the corruption. 

VIII. Public Spending at Historic Highs and the DPWH Flood Control Scandal

Figure 4

Today, public spending as a share of GDP is at its highest level (!!) compared to pre-EDSA I and pre-EDSA II—and that’s counting only direct public expenditures, excluding construction and private sector participation in government projects such as PPPs and other ancillary ventures. [Figure 4, upper diagram] 

From this perspective, the ongoing flood control scandal is merely the tip of the iceberg, with contractors and select authorities in the “hot chair” serving as convenient fall guys for a much larger, systemic issue. 

IX. The DPWH Scandal: A Systemic Threat 

These X.com headlines provide a stark clue as to how public spending and GDP might be affected: [Figure 4, lower images]

• DPWH, DBM set 2-week deadline to review DPWH budget
• Palace says review of DPWH’s 2026 budget could expand to other agencies
• DPWH Secretary Vince Dizon suspends bidding for locally funded projects amid massive corruption scandal 

The unfolding DPWH scandal threatens more than reputational damage—it risks triggering a contractionary spiral that could expose the fragility of the Philippine top-down heavy economic development model. 

With Php 1.033 trillion allotted to DPWH alone (16.3% of the 2025 budget)—which was lowered to Php 900 billion (14.2% of total budget)—and Php 1.507 trillion for infrastructure overall (23.8% and estimated 5.2% of the GDP), any slowdown in disbursements could reverberate across sectors. 

Many large firms are structurally tied to public projects, and the economy’s current momentum leans heavily on credit-fueled activity rather than organic productivity. 

Curtailing infrastructure outlays, even temporarily, risks puncturing GDP optics and exposing the private sector’s underlying weakness. 

Or if infrastructure spending is curtailed or delayed, growth slows and tax revenues fall—VAT, corporate, and income tax collections all weaken when economic activity contracts. 

This means the deficit doesn’t necessarily shrink despite spending restraint; the “fiscal hole” may, in fact, widen—imperiling fiscal stability and setting the stage for a potential fiscal shock. 

The irony is stark: efforts to contain corruption by tightening spending could deepen the very gap they aim to close.

To be clear, this is not a defense of corruption but rather a reminder of how dependent GDP growth has become on public spending, leaving it vulnerable to the vagaries of political oscillation—including the ongoing flood control corruption scandal.

X. A Policy Dilemma: The Impossible Choice

Figure 5

With debt servicing already absorbing a growing share of the budget (7-month interest payment accounted for 14.8% share of expenditure), and revenue buoyancy dependent on infra-led growth, the administration faces a dilemma—either sustain spending through a compromised political pipeline or risk a broader economic and fiscal unraveling. 

The lesson is, the real danger lies not in the scandal itself, but in the systemic exposure it threatens to reveal: 

• A growth model overly reliant on state-led spending
• A fiscal framework vulnerable to both political shocks and bureaucratic paralysis
• A debt trajectory that leaves little room for error when revenues falter 

In short, the interventionist mindset at the core of social democracy’s "free lunch" political economy entrenches structural fragility, as shown by the mounting fiscal imbalance. 

The DPWH scandal crystallizes a deeper tension—forcing the political economy to weigh popular demands for ‘good governance’ against the imperatives of a development model structurally reliant on public spending. 

As Roman historian Tacitus warned (The Annals of Imperial Rome): 

"The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws."

____

References 

Vibhu Vikramaditya How Democratic Socialism Inverts the Logic of Civil Society Mises.org, September 3, 2025 

Prudent Investor Newsletter, Philippine Government’s July Deficit "Narrowed" from Changes in VAT Reporting Schedule, Raised USD 2.5 Billion Plus $500 Million Climate Financing September 1, 2024 Substack 

Prudent Investor Newsletter, June 2025 Deficit: A Countdown to Fiscal Shock, August 3, 2025 Substack 

Joshua Mawhorter Interventionist Non-Interventionism Mises.org, September 5, 2025 

Prudent Investor Newsletter, The CMEPA Delusion: How Fallacious Arguments Conceal the Risk of Systemic Blowback, July 27, 2025 Substack 

Frédéric Bastiat Economic sophisms, 2nd series (1848), ch. 1 Physiology of plunder ("Sophismes économiques", 2ème série (1848), chap. 1 "Physiologie de la spoliation"). Econolib 

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law (1850), Ludwig von Mises Institute 2007 Mises.org

 

June 2025 Deficit: A Countdown to Fiscal Shock

In the final analysis, it’s just central banks printing money, reducing its value and causing inflation as they support dishonest governments that refuse to be fiscally responsible and continually run massive deficits. Such policies flow from the “elite’s” greed and their insatiable thirst for power, benefiting themselves at the expense of the middle class and working poor… When a society loses its moral foundation, it’s only a matter of time before the economy and currency deteriorate and the wealth gaps between the rich and poor increase dramatically—Jonathan Wellum  

In this issue

June 2025 Deficit: A Countdown to Fiscal Shock 

I. A Delayed Reckoning: Anatomy of a Fiscal Shock

1. Easy Money–Financed Free Lunch Politics

2. The Political Cult of Spending-Led Ideology: Trickle-Down by Government Fiat

3. Chronic Policy Diagnostic Blindness

4. Econometric Myopia: Forecasting the Past

5. Behavioral Fragility: The Psychology of Denial

II. Countdown to Fiscal Shock: The Hidden Story of June’s Blowout

III. Q2 Slowdown, Q1 Surge: Anatomy of the Half-Year Blowout—From Past Binge to Present Reckoning

IV. Technocratic Overreach, Authorized Expenditures, Congressional Irrelevance

V. Deficit Forecasting: Averaging Toward a Crisis

VI. Financing Strain and the Debt-Debt Servicing Spiral

VII. Tax Dragnet, CMEPA’s Forced Financial Rotation: The Economic Asphyxiation Tightens

VIII. Bank’s Fiscal Complicity, Liquidity Strains, Treasury Market’s Mutiny

IX. Mounting USDPHP Exchange Rate Tension

X. Conclusion: The Structural Fragility of Deficit Philosophy 

June 2025 Deficit: A Countdown to Fiscal Shock 

When deficits become destiny: the fiscal countdown accelerates—a convergence of easy money and political overreach

I. A Delayed Reckoning: Anatomy of a Fiscal Shock 

A fiscal shock rarely emerges from a single misstep. It crystallizes from compound misalignments across policy, ideology, and behavior. It’s the law of unintended consequences—unfolding in real time. Where economic orthodoxy meets political convenience, stability is hollowed out. And just as critically, it’s a delayed consequence of systemic denial. 

Here are the five pillars of this reckoning: 

1. Easy Money–Financed Free Lunch Politics 

A regime of entitlement—fueled by populist spending and post-pandemic ultra-low rates—fostered a seductive illusion: 

Deficits don’t matter. Debt is painless. 

Years of stimulus, subsidies, and politically popular transfers hardened into fiscal habit— habits that now resist restraint, and are rooted in beliefs that are difficult to dismantle. 

2. The Political Cult of Spending-Led Ideology: Trickle-Down by Government Fiat 

At the heart of the Philippine development model lies a flawed political-economic ideology: that elite consumption and state expenditure will "trickle down" to the broader economy. 

Massive infrastructure programs, defense outlays, and subsidy-heavy welfare budgets may deliver short-term optics—but they also crowd out private investment, misallocate capital, and accelerate savings erosion. 

The result: an economy that becomes top-heavy, brittle, and structurally vulnerable. 

This heavy-handed, statist-interventionist, anti-market bias is what Ludwig von Mises called "statolatry"—the worship of the state. 

3. Chronic Policy Diagnostic Blindness 

In the social democratic playbook, populist tools dominate. And with them comes a dangerous neglect of structural realities:

• Crowding out is ignored
• Balance sheet mismatches are waved off
• Price distortions go unexamined
• Resource misallocations are dismissed
• Economic trade-offs are neglected 

Intervention becomes the default—not the diagnosis. The result? Mispriced assets, distorted capital structures, and risk narratives untethered from fundamentals. 

The same statolatry—elevating state action above market signals—undergirds this blindness. It promotes interventionist reflexes at the expense of incentive clarity and institutional coherence. 

Fragility escalates—masked by the optics of populist-driven fiscal theatrics. 

4. Econometric Myopia: Forecasting the Past 

The establishment clings to econometric models built on frangible assumptions—historical baselines, linear extrapolation, and trend mimicry. These tools overlook what matters most: 

• Nonlinear disruption
• Inflection points
• Complex feedback loops
• Tail risks and structural breaks 

With ZERO margin for error, fragility festers beneath the surface. 

That fragility was laid bare by a maelstrom of paradigm shifts: 

• The pandemic rupture
• Deglobalization and trade fragmentation
• Raging asset bubbles
• Debt overload
• Mountains of malinvestments
• Hot wars and geopolitical shockwaves
• Inflation surges
• Financial weaponization 

This isn’t noise—it’s a new architecture of global and domestic uncertainties. And econometric orthodoxy isn’t equipped to model it. 

5. Behavioral Fragility: The Psychology of Denial 

Heuristics shape policy—and not in ways that reward foresight. Beyond populist signaling and econometric hindsight, cognitive distortions rule: 

• Recency bias
• Rear-view heuristics
• Political denialism masked as institutional confidence 

Years of perceived “resilience” dulled vigilance: 

• Every deficit was shrugged off
• Every peso slide deemed temporary
• Every fiscal blowout “absorbed” by the system 

This cultivated an expectation: past stability ensures future resilience. It doesn’t. That assumption—embedded deep within policy reflexes—has left institutions blind to volatility and ill-equipped for disruptions and rupture. 

II. Countdown to Fiscal Shock: The Hidden Story of June’s Blowout

Figure 1

In May, we warned that if June 2025's deficit merely hits its four-year average of Php 200 billion, the six-month budget gap would surge to Php 723.9 billion—surpassing the pandemic-era record of Php 716.07 billion. (Figure 1, upper window) 

Inquirer.net, July 25, 2025: The Marcos administration exceeded its budget deficit limit in the first half of 2025 after narrowly missing both its spending and revenue targets. This happened amid a gradual fiscal consolidation program. Latest data from the Bureau of the Treasury (BTr) showed the government logged a budget gap of P765.5 billion in the first six months, which it needed to plug with borrowings. This was 24.69 percent bigger compared with a year ago. (italics added) 

Then came the payload: Php 241.6 billion in fresh red ink last June!   

The government’s first-half deficit reached Php 765.5 billion—24.69% higher than last year and larger than even our most aggressive baseline x.com forecast (Php 745.18–Php 756.53 billion). (Figure 1, table)

Figure 2 

Bullseye! Our projections weren't just close—they were surgical. And the final blowout went further still. (Figure 2, topmost chart) 

Curiously underreported, June’s deficit marked an all-time high, driven by expenditure growth of 8.5% outstripping revenue growth of 3.5%. (Figure 2, middle graph) 

• BIR Collections: Up 16.24% YoY—a strong bounce from 10.71% in May and 4.71% in June 2024.
• BoC Collections: Recovered 3.23% YoY, compared to –6.94% in May and 0.67% in June 2024.
• Non-Tax Revenues: Plunged 43.25% YoY—from 40.93% in May and 81.7% in June 2024. 

Behind the aggregate improvement lies deeper fragility: June’s revenue outperformance was narrow, uneven, and ultimately insufficient to contain the programmed spending expansion—a predictable artifact of the conventional socio-democratic ochlocratic political model. 

Populist instincts override structural diagnostics. And the fiscal narrative remains hostage to crowd-pleasing interventionism rather than incentive discipline or institutional coherence.

III. Q2 Slowdown, Q1 Surge: Anatomy of the Half-Year Blowout—From Past Binge to Present Reckoning 

Despite June's record deficit, Q2 posted just Php 319.5 billion, the second slowest since 2020. That means the bulk of the six-month deficit—Php 446.03 billion—was frontloaded in Q1. 

Even then, authorities revised March spending down by Php 32.784 billion, artificially narrowing the Q1 deficit. Adjustments may mask the underlying magnitude but not the fiscal trajectory. 

This six-month outcome validates what we’ve long emphasized: programmed spending vs. variable revenues is no longer an assumption—it’s a structural vulnerability, a primary source of instability 

Importantly, this wasn’t an emergency stimulus. Unlike 2021, there’s been no recession nor one in the immediate horizon—per consensus. 

Yet the deficit beat that year’s record—despite BSP’s historic easing:

• Policy rate cuts
• Reserve requirement reduction
• USDPHP cap
• Liquidity injections
• Deposit insurance expansion 

Behind the optics: a quiet financial bailout, not of households or industries, but of the banking system. 

IV. Technocratic Overreach, Authorized Expenditures, Congressional Irrelevance 

As we earlier noted: the government continues to use linear extrapolation in a complex environment. Even with declared economic slowdown, the BIR posted 14.11% growth, buoyed by May–June outperformance. (Figure 2, lowest image) 

But has "benchmark-ism" inflated performance claims? Have authorities padded the numerator (tax data) to rationalize a fragile denominator (spending data)?

Figure 3

Non-tax revenue was the Achilles’ heel—its 2024 spike became the baseline for 2025’s enacted spending binge. The result: forecast miscalibration leading directly to fiscal shock. Beyond mere overconfidence, it was technocratic hubris that helped trigger today’s blowout. (Figure 3, topmost visual) 

Again, an underperforming economy—whether a below-target GDP, sharp slowdown, or even recession—would only reinforce this SPEND-and-RESCUE dynamic, repackaged and sold as stimulus. 

Meanwhile, authorized expenditures: Php 3.026 trillion. Remaining balance: Php 3.3 trillion, implying a floor monthly average of Php 550.05 billion. 

Budgets have been breached 6 years in a row—highlighting a redistribution of budgetary power from Congress to the Executive. 

Whether through creative reinterpretation or technical loopholes, these breaches signal a quiet transfer of fiscal power from Congress to the Executive. 

V. Deficit Forecasting: Averaging Toward a Crisis 

Looking at pandemic-era averages:

• Q3 deficits averaged Php 374 billion
• Q3 2024 hit Php 356.32 billion (–5.7% below average)
• Q4 averaged Php 537.9 billion Q4 is typically the largest—as government drops all remaining balance and more
• Q4 2024 deficit: Php 536.13 billion (–0.4% deviation)
• 2H Average: Php 911.6 billion
• 2H 2024: Php 892.45 billion (–2.6% vs trend) 

If 2025 follows this pattern, the full-year deficit could hit Php 1.677 trillion—Php 7 billion above prior records. 

But averages conceal real-world volatility, political discretion, and data manipulation—can skew results. 

Once again, it bears emphasizing: all this unfolded as the BSP eased aggressively—through rate and RRR cuts, doubled deposit insurance, capped USDPHP volatility, and expanded credit (mostly consumer-focused). 

Despite the stimulus, vulnerabilities not only persist—they’re escalating. 

If so, the DBCC's revised deficit-to-GDP target of 5.5% would be breached, necessitating another substantial upward adjustment. (Figure 3, middle table) 

Authorities would be mistaken to treat this as mere statistical noise; its implications extend far beyond the ledger into the real economy

VI. Financing Strain and the Debt-Debt Servicing Spiral 

Treasury financing soared 86.2%, from Php 665 billion to Php 1.238 trillion in H1 2025. (Figure 3, lowest diagram) 

Even with record high cumulative cash reserves of Php 1.09 trillion, June alone posted a residual cash deficit of Php 90.09 billion—evidence that surplus buffers are already depleted.

Figure 4 

As such, in June, public debt spiked Php 1.783 trillion YoY (+11.52%) or Php 348 billion (+2.06%) MoM to reach a historic Php 17.27 trillion! (Figure 4, topmost pane) 

Critically, this growth has outpaced the spending curve, suggesting potential deficit understatement or an acceleration of off-book liabilities. (Figure 4, middle image) 

Despite this, external debt share rebounded in June—a pivot back to foreign financing amid domestic constraints. (Figure 4, lowest graph)

Figure 5

Meanwhile, total debt servicing fell 40.12% YoY due to a 61% plunge in amortizations, even though interest payments hit a record. (Figure 5, topmost diagram) 

Why?

Likely causes:

• Scheduling choices
• Prepayments in 2024
• Political aversion to public backlash 

But the record and growing deficit ensures that borrowing—and debt servicing—will keep RISING. This won’t be deferred—it will amplify. 

As we warned last May

• More debt → more servicing → less for everything else.
• Crowding out hits both public and private spending.
• Revenue gains won’t keep up with servicing.
• Inflation and peso depreciation risks climb.
• Higher taxes are on the horizon 

VII. Tax Dragnet, CMEPA’s Forced Financial Rotation: The Economic Asphyxiation Tightens 

Debt-to-GDP hit 62%, triggering a quiet revision: Malacañang raised the ceiling to 70%. 

To accommodate this, authorities imposed a hefty tax on interest income via the Capital Markets Efficiency Promotion Act (CMEPA), engineering a forced rotation out of long-dated fixed income into leverage-fueled speculation and spending— (see previous discussions) 

This fiscal extraction dragnet is poised to widen—ensnaring more of the economy and constricting what little fiscal breathing room remains. 

VIII. Bank’s Fiscal Complicity, Liquidity Strains, Treasury Market’s Mutiny 

Banks continue to stockpile government securities through net claims on the central government (NCoCG). (Figure 5, middle image) 

Yet despite BSP’s easing, treasury yields barely moved—fueling further Held-to-Maturity (HTM) hoarding and deepening the industry's liquidity drain. 

At end of July, despite dovish guidance: (Figure 5, lowest graph) 

• Yields across the curve stayed above ONRRP, muting or blunting transmission
• Curve flattened unevenly: front and long ends softened, belly firmed—signaling hedging against medium-term risk
• T-bill rates remained elevated —signaling inflation fears and short-term funding stress 

Despite rate cuts, the treasury market refused to follow. Monetary policy faces bond mutineers. 

IX. Mounting USDPHP Exchange Rate Tension

Figure 6 

Following the June fiscal report, the USDPHP surged 1.29% on July 31, wiping out prior losses to post a modest 0.52% year-to-date return. 

With wider deficits on deck, foreign borrowing becomes more attractive—and a weaker dollar, further incentivized by the BSP’s soft peg, adds fuel to that pivot. But beneath the surface, this dynamic strain long-term currency stability. 

While global dollar softness might offset domestic fragilities, the USDPHP’s recent breakout hints at further testing—possibly probing the BSP’s 59-Maginot line, a psychological and tactical policy threshold. (Figure 6 upper chart) 

Should that line give, external financing costs and FX volatility could surge, exposing cracks in the peg architecture. (Figure 6, lower graph) 

X. Conclusion: The Structural Fragility of Deficit Philosophy

The Php 17.27 trillion debt—and growing—isn’t the cost of failure. It’s the price of consensus under a soft-focus ochlocratic social democracy. 

These systems don’t just elect leaders—they ratify an ethos: that deficit-fueled expansion is not only moral but inevitable. Redistribution becomes ritual. The annual SONA pipelines new spending schemes, boosting short-term political capital—but the structural anchors are threadbare. 

Compassion without discipline sedates policy. Voters misread rhetoric as reform, empathy as capability, largesse as virtue, and control as stewardship. Time preferences spiral, gravitating toward the instant dopamine hit of political dispensation. 

Alas—the tragedy is not merely fiscal. It’s intergenerational erosion. Each electoral cycle mortgages future agency, compounding fragility over time. 

What’s swelling isn’t just debt. It’s a philosophical incoherence—subsidizing dysfunction and labeling it 'development.’ 

When such convictions are deeply embedded, a disorderly reckoning is inevitable. 

____

References 

Prudent Investor Newsletter, The Philippines’ May and 5-Month 2025 Budget Deficit: Can Political Signaling Mask a Looming Fiscal Shock? Substack July 7, 2025 

Prudent Investor Newsletter, Is the Philippines on the Brink of a 2025 Fiscal Shock? Substack June 8, 2025 

Prudent Investor Newsletter, Philippine Fiscal Performance in Q1 2025: Record Deficit Amid Centralizing Power, Substack May 4, 2025 

Prudent Investor Newsletter, The Seen, the Unseen, and the Taxed: CMEPA as Financial Repression by Design, Substack, July 20, 2025 

Prudent Investor Newsletter, The CMEPA Delusion: How Fallacious Arguments Conceal the Risk of Systemic Blowback, Substack, July 27, 2025