Causa remota of any crisis is the expansion of credit and speculation while causa proxima is some incident that saps the confidence of the system and induces investors to sell commodities, stocks, real estate, bills of exchange, or promissory notes and increase their money holdings. The causa proxima may be trivial: a bankruptcy, a suicide, a flight, a revelation of fraud, a refusal of credit to some borrowers, or some change of view that leads a market participant with a large position to sell. Prices fall. Expectations are reversed. The downward price movement accelerates—Charles P. Kindelberger
In this issue
Melt-Up! Philippine
Financial-Bank Index Hits a Milestone High!
I. US Banks Powered Global
Financials ETF to a Record High!
II. Melt-up! The Philippine
Financial-Bank Index Carves a Fresh All-Time High!
III. Tightening, what
Tightening? Finance Outperformed the PSE Since 2020, Banks Centralize Financial
Resources
IV. The Paradox of Financial
and Real-Estate Performance; Year-To-Date Performances of Listed Banks
V. Record Financial
Index: From the Perspective of Volume and Foreign Money Flows
VI. Cross-Border
Leveraged Speculation Powered the Record High of the Financial/Bank Index
VII. Bank Borrowings in a Melt-UP Phase too! Conclusion
Melt-Up! Philippine Financial-Bank Index Hits a Milestone High!
The share prices of many Philippine banks have been in a melt-up. But what’s been driving this surge?
I. US Banks Powered Global Financials ETF to a Record High!
Thanks to the extraordinary loosening of financial conditions, which has spurred booming credit and stock market activity, some of the top U.S. banks reported exceptional performance in Q3 2024 last week.
As a result, share prices of Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) and Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) soared to all-time highs.
In turn, BlackRock’s iShares Global Financials ETF, the IXG (NYSE ARCA: IXG), which has been on an uptrend since the lows of October 2020, also reached a fresh record high after surpassing its previous peak set in 2007.
The IXG's portfolio consists of 209 global equities primarily in financial services and banking, with over 55% of its holdings in US markets. This week, the IXG surged 2.25% and has generated a 26.13% return in 2024 (as of October 18).
Figure 1Financials ranked fourth among the best-performing sectors in the S&P 500, with a 26.5% return, trailing Information Technology at 33.25%, Utilities at 29.3%, and Communications at 28.3% (as of October 18). [Figure 1, topmost table]
Despite the backdrop of supposedly high interest rates, October 2022 marked a turning point for the financial sector. This followed the Bank of England’s (BoE) intervention to rescue its troubled pension funds during the selloff of UK bonds.
The subsequent bailout of U.S. banks during the 2023 crisis further emboldened speculative activity, as central bank interventions have created what many view as a "moral hazard"—the belief that central banks will always step in to support the markets.
Expectations of easing by the Federal Reserve and other central banks have fueled the blistering rise of the IXG. The rapid pace of this ascent bears an unsettling resemblance to the 2007 episode, which preceded the Great Financial Crisis (GFC). [Figure 1, middle image]
II. Melt-up! The Philippine Financial-Bank Index Carves a Fresh All-Time High!
What does this have to do with the PSE?
The PSEi 30 closed the week ending October 18th up 1.44%, pushing 2024 Year-to-Date (YTD) returns to 14.97%.
Leading the gains this week was the Financial/Bank Index, with a 3.5% spike, followed by the Property Index, which climbed 2.11%.
The strong performance of the banking and property sectors supposedly reflects the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas' (BSP) announcement of its second round of rate cuts, effective October 17.
With this week’s surge, Financials have swiftly secured the second spot YTD with a 39.3% return, closing in on the ICT-led Service Sector, which holds the top position with 40.7%.
Since the PSEi 30 hit its June 2021 lows—mirroring trends in the U.S.—financials have sprinted ahead of other sectors. The Financial Index returned 29.9%, followed by the Property Index at 25%, both contributing to the PSEi 30’s overall 20.4% gain over this period. (Figure 1, lowest graph)
Figure 2
Here’s the thing: the Financial/Bank Index set a new record last September, surpassing its January 2018 high of 2,325.65. In a parabolic fashion, similar to global markets, the financial/bank index decisively reinforced its end-September breakout with this week’s push to 2,421.6. (Figure 2, topmost chart)
Once again, China Bank’s incredible vertical rise is unprecedented, showcasing price volatility that is unbecoming of traditional banks. (Figure 2 middle chart)
As previously pointed out, similar to the Lehman episode, skyrocketing prices tend to disguise underlying problems.
In essence, the parabolic rise of financials hardly indicates a healthy bull market. If history serves as a guide (as seen in 2012 and 2018), this could be a sign of an interim top.
Or could this time be different?
III. Tightening, what Tightening? Finance Outperformed the PSE Since 2020, Banks Centralize Financial Resources
The Financial/Bank Index currently consists of eight constituents: seven banks—Asia United Bank [AUB], BDO Unibank [BDO], Bank of the Philippine Islands [BPI], China Banking [CBC], Metrobank [MBT], Philippine National Bank [PNB], and Security Bank [SECB]—and one non-bank entity, the Philippine Stock Exchange [PSE].
Three of the bank members in the Financial Index are also part of the PSEi 30 composite, with two of them ranking among the top five.
While recent mainstream discussions have focused on how banks benefit from the liquidity injections via significant Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR) cuts, and BSP rate cuts, the Financial Index has been outperforming the PSEi 30 since 2020. (Figure 2, lowest diagram)
This trend began when the BSP implemented historic measures to support the industry, including quantitative easing (QE), rate cuts, RRR cuts, and relief measures.
This indicates that current dynamics represent a continuation of an underlying trend.
Figure 3The BSP’s Total Resources of the Financial System (TRFS) data reveals that not only is it outgrowing GDP, but the share of banking resources—particularly from universal commercial (UC) banks—has been driving most of this growth. Philippine bank and UC bank share of the TRFS accounted for 83.4% and 78.05% last August. (Figure 3, topmost window)
This highlights a concentration of resources and a deepening dependence of the economy on bank credit and liquidity. Thus, when officials claim they are promoting capital markets, it only holds true if banks benefit from it.
Ironically, despite previous rate hikes, the TRFS suggests there has been little actual "tightening" or "restrictiveness" in the system.
The outperformance of the Financial/Bank Index further confirms this. Yet, even with the availability of public data, discussions surrounding these insights are often sparse.
IV. The Paradox of Financial and Real-Estate Performance; Year-To-Date Performances of Listed Banks
In contrast, despite the substantial rebound in the Property Index from June 21 through September, it has yet to break its pattern of underperformance relative to the PSEi 30. (Figure 3, middle graph)
These divergent trends suggest that, regardless of the measures undertaken by the BSP, the property sector remains hindered by internal challenges.
In fact, contrary to most predictions, low interest rates have contributed to the real estate sector's struggles. As the BSP eased monetary policy over the past decade, the sector's value-added share of GDP fell to recent all-time lows—an indication of malinvestment. (Figure 3, lowest chart)
Figure 4
Still, the Year-to-Date (YTD) performance of all listed banks, which has averaged a return of 27.08% as of October 18, has been skewed in favor of the banks that are part of the financial/bank index. (Figure 4, topmost image)
Rocketing stock prices of Financial Index members AUB and CBC have delivered impressive YTD returns of 91.3% and 94.59%, respectively. (Figure 4, middle visual)
Meanwhile, PSEi 30 mainstays BDO, BPI, and MBT produced returns of 25.7%, 37.9%, and 56.5%, respectively. SECB also saw a solid return of 36.5%.
Have CBC and AUB struck a "gold mine" that the market has only recently discovered?
V. Record Financial Index: From the Perspective of Volume and Foreign Money Flows
Volume and foreign money flows offer another perspective.
Although the PSEi 30 briefly surged past 7,500 before retreating, trading volume remains relatively sluggish. (Figure 4, lowest graph)
But that’s only part of the story.
What remains less known to many is that despite this overall lethargy, financials and banks have captured the bulk of the trading volume or a significant portion has been concentrated in financials and banks.
The BSP and PSE have yet to release transaction data for August and September.
Figure 5However, using July data, the 7-month share of financials' volume relative to total market volume reached an all-time high of 23.7% in 2023. It has since retreated to 19.1% this year, the second-highest on record. That number, however, could reach a new high in October. (Figure 5, topmost image)
As of October 18, the financial sector's share of gross trading volume had soared to 26.5% (and its share of mainboard volume to 29.6%).
In other words, the financial/banking sector has absorbed about a quarter of the PSE's sluggish trading volume! That’s an astonishing level of concentration risk—Incredible!
Given my limited access to sophisticated database organizing tools, I have only managed to tabulate foreign flows using October data, which is limited to the top five Financial Index members: AUB, BDO, BPI, CBC, and SECB.
There is no question that these top five banks dominate the turnover share, accounting for 90.7% during the week leading up to October 18 and 84.8% for the entire month of October.
VI. Cross-Border Leveraged Speculation Powered the Record High of the Financial/Bank Index
But here are some additional insights:
Net foreign inflows of Php 892.5 million for the top five banks represented 20.94% of the Php 4.261 billion total foreign inflows for October.
Notably, a substantial portion of this, accounting for 87.8% or Php 953.2 million, originated from last week alone, out of a total inflow of Php 1.086 billion.
In short, the recent surge to a record high in the Financial/Bank Index was largely driven by foreign capital, likely bolstered by the "national team" (such as the treasury departments of banks, Maharlika SWF and other financial corporations or OFCs?).
Stunning.
It’s looks likely that some of the foreign money chasing the U.S.-based IXG (iShares Global Financials ETF) rally has been positioning itself in emerging market banks like those in the Philippines.
What we are witnessing appears to be unadulterated, leveraged speculative cross-border allocations, primarily focused on banks and, to a lesser extent, communications companies (telcos). [See returns of S&P 500 sector above]
Further, the PSEi 30’s weekly breadth was overwhelmingly positive, with 19 of the 30 issues gaining and three remaining unchanged, averaging a 1.43% increase—almost mirroring the index’s actual weekly return of 1.44%. Two stocks, Meralco and Century Pacific Food (CNPF), hit all-time highs this week. (Figure 5, middle chart)
Weekly gains in the three banks contributed significantly to the PSEi 30’s performance. These banks accounted for 22.6% of the index, while the top five heavyweights—two of which are banks—commanded over half (50.83%) of the PSEi 30 as of October 18. (Figure 5, lowest pane)
VII. Bank Borrowings in a Melt-UP Phase too! Conclusion
Before we conclude, as we await the PSE and the BSP to release September and Q3 data on individual banks and the overall banking system, it is noteworthy that some banks, such as PBCOM and PNB, have recently announced plans to raise funds through debt issuance in the capital markets.
Figure 6
It’s not just share prices that are surging—Philippine banks are also experiencing a sharp increase in borrowing—bonds and bills soared 32.3% in August. (Figure 6, topmost and middle graphs)
Why the rush to raise funds?
The answer lies in the ongoing deterioration of liquidity within the banking system, as indicated by declining cash-to-deposit and liquid-assets-to-deposit ratios. (Figure 6, lowest chart)
The pressing question is: How will banks continue to fund the government under these conditions? The BSP’s response: Cut their Reserve Requirements, unleash liquidity!
To wrap up, what you see in the media or mainstream discourse often doesn’t reflect the full picture.