From the Business Insider (bold highlights original)
The theme of this year’s Technology Day at MIT was advanced manufacturing in the U.S. Kresge Auditorium was close to capacity with alumni from all reunion years.
Learned MIT faculty weighed in on the importance of proximity between engineers and factories. The Atlas Device story was initially an inspiring tale of can-do New England spirit, with engineers in Somerville and a machine shop in Woburn working together to make improvements on a weekly basis.
But then we found out that the main customer was the U.S. military and they really didn’t care how much it cost or how efficiently it was produced. Similarly, the solar cell talk was great until we learned that there are about 12 good reasons why solar cells must be manufactured in Asia.
In a panel discussion afterwards, the speakers were asked what it would take to make the U.S. more competitive for manufacturing.
The answer was that it was pretty much hopeless at current tax rates.
Big companies make a lot of money in foreign countries, but if they bring the profits back home they get hit with the world’s highest corporate tax rate. So they leave the money in China, for example, and then invest it there in research and development or a new factory. I.e., our own multinational companies are financing the new facilities around the world that are rendering the U.S. uncompetitive.
Globalization is not to be blamed for investors who straddle to take advantage of the variances of tax rates. Instead, tax competition should help keep a check on insatiable or greedy governments. And importantly, tax competition provides a channel for the old saw—”money flows where it is treated best”.
The lesson is that tax rates should be competitive as they signify as one of the key variable in determining resource allocations. Although I would prefer to abolish them all.