Jim Rogers and James Grant Accurately Predicted the end of the SNB’s Disastrous Policy

What has Jim Rogers and James Grant have in common?

Well, not only have they predicted the outcome of the SNB’s policies, both lean on or use Austrian economics for their analysis.

The legendary investor Jim Rogers’ warned of the unsustainable policies embraced by the SNB in his book 2013 book Street Smart.

Here’s an excerpt (sourced from Business Insider Australia) [bold mine]

I had opened my first Swiss bank account in 1970 in the face of coming turmoil in the currency markets. By the end of the decade, as the markets grew more volatile, people all over the world were trying to open Swiss accounts. And the same thing is happening today. The dollar is suspect, the euro is suspect, and again people are rushing to the franc. In 2011, the CHF (the Swiss franc) escalated to record highs against both the euro and the dollar, rising 43 per cent against the euro in a year and a half as of August 2011.

It was a “massive overvaluation,” according to the country’s central bank, the Swiss National Bank (SNB). Under pressure from the country’s exporters, the SNB announced that “the value of the franc is a threat to the economy” and said it was “prepared to purchase foreign exchange in unlimited quantities” in order to drive the price down.

A threat to the economy? It was the exporters who were doing the screaming, but everybody else in Switzerland was better-off. When the franc rises, everything the Swiss import goes down in price, whether it is cotton shirts, TVs, or cars. The standard of living for everybody goes up. Every citizen of Switzerland benefits from a stronger currency. Our dental technician down in Geneva is not calling up and moaning. She is happy. Everything she buys is cheaper. But the big exporters get on the phone and the government takes their call.

The franc went down 7 or 8 per cent the day of the SNB announcement. Nobody, at least in the beginning, wanted to take on the central bank. But the bank’s currency manipulation will turn out to be disastrous. One of two things is going to happen.

In the first scenario, the market will continue to buy Swiss francs, which means that the Swiss National Bank will just have to keep printing and printing and printing, and that will of course debase the currency. Now, there are major exporters in Switzerland who might benefit, but the largest industry in Switzerland, the single largest business, is finance. The economy rises or falls on the nation’s ability to attract capital. And the reason people put their money there is their trust in the soundness of the currency- they not that their money will be there when they want it, and that it will not be worth significantly less than when they put it there in the first place.

But people will stop rushing to put their money into a country where the value of the currency is deliberately being driven down. After the Second World War and for the next thirty years, people took their money out of the United Kingdom because the currency plummeted. (Politicians blamed it on the gnomes of Zurich.) London ceased to be the world’s reserve financial center because Britain’s money was no good. Similarly, if you debase the franc, eventually nobody will want it. You will have eroded its value, not simply as a medium of exchange, but also a monetary refuge. The money will move to Singapore or Hong Kong, and the Swiss finance industry will wither up and disappear.

The alternative scenario is what happened in July 2010, the last time the Swiss tried to weaken their currency. They did so by buying up foreign currencies to hold against the franc-selling the franc to keep the price down. But the market just kept buying the francs, and the Swiss central bank, after quadrupling its foreign currency holdings, abandoned the effort. At that point, when the bank stopped selling it, the Swiss franc rose in value, all the currencies the Swiss had bought (and were now holding) declined in value, and the country lost $US21 billion. In the end, the market had more money than the bank, and market forces inevitably prevailed.

In the late 1970s when everyone was rushing to the franc, the Swiss National Bank, to stem the tide, imposed negative interest rates on foreign depositors. The government levied a tax on anybody who bought the currency. It was their form of exchange controls back then. If you bought 100 Swiss francs, you wound up with 70 in your pocket. Today, with the rush on again, The Economist has described the Swiss currency as “an innocent bystander in a world where the eurozone’s politicians have failed to sort out their sovereign-debt crisis, America’s economic policy seems intent on spooking investors and the Japanese have intervened to hold down the value of the yen.”

All of which is true, but I think the problem runs deeper than that. The Swiss for decades had a semi monopoly on finance. And as a result they have become less and less competent. The entire economy has been overprotected. The reason Swiss Air went bankrupt is because it never really had to compete. Any monopoly eventually destroys itself, and Switzerland, in predictable fashion, is corroding from within. As a result, other financial centres have been rising: London, Lichtenstein, Vienna, Singapore, Dubai, Hong Kong.

Well again, James Grant of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer shares the limelight for having foreseen the unraveling of the ill fated franc-euro cap. 

From Grant’s Interest Rate Observer: “The Balance Sheet that Ate the World September 19, 2014 (source LinkedIn; hat tip zero hedge) [bold mine]

Like a celebrity in flight from the paparazzi, the Swiss Confederation demands protection from its pesky admirers. To beat back the unwanted appreciation of the Swissie, the Swiss National Bank is--once again--vowing to move heaven and earth. Now under way is a speculation. Prompted by a friend (that's you, Harlan Batrus),we venture that the SNB will sooner or later be forced to permit the franc to appreciate and thus to enrich the holders of low-priced, three-year call options on the Swiss/euro exchange rate. It's a long shot, to be sure--the options are cheap for a reason--but we judge that the prospective reward is worth the obvious risk.

Curiously, for all the damage that Swiss private banks have suffered at the hands of American regulators, and for all the Federal Reserve's throat clearing about the supposed imminent rise in dollar interest rates, the franc is still, for many, the monetary bolt-hole of choice. To the Swiss, whose exports generate 54% of Switzerland's GDP, it's a kind of popularity they can live without--indeed, they insist, must live without.

So the SNB prints francs. It drew a monetary line in the sand three years ago: The franc shall not rally through the 1.20-to-the-euro mark, the authorities commanded in September 2011. To enforce this dictum, they bought euros with newly created francs (the cost of production of the home currency being essentially zero). What to do with the rising euro mountain? Invest it, of course.

CFA fashion, the central bankers are diversifying across asset classes and currencies. Among these asset classes are equities, and among these currencies is the dollar. As of June 30, the Swiss managers held $27 billion in 2,533 different U.S. stocks, according to the bank's latest 13-F report (the gnomes file with the SEC just like ordinary big hitters, say George Soros or Goldman Sachs Asset Management).

Here's a metaphysical head scratcher. The Europeans conjure euros, which the Swiss buy with their newly materialized francs. The managers exchange the euros for dollars (also produced by taps on a keyboard) and with that scrip buy ownership interests in real businesses. The equities are genuine. The money, legally and practically speaking, is itself real--you never mind having a little more of it. But what is its substance? We mean, how is it different from air?

In any case, observes colleague Evan Lorenz, the scale of the Swiss operations is titanic. He reports that, from December 2007 to July 2014, the SNB's balance sheet expanded to the equivalent of 83% of Swiss GDP from 23% of Swiss GDP. For perspective, over approximately the same span of years--and after three successive QE programs that boosted the Federal Reserve's assets by $3.5 trillion--the Fed's balance sheet as a percent of U.S. output expanded to 25% from 6%.

Swiss interest rates have shriveled as the SNB's balance sheet has grown. Thus, in January 2008, the average rate on 10-year, fixed-rate mortgages was an already low 4.17%; as of June 2014, 10-year loans were offered at an average of 2.25%. "In other words," Lorenz points out, "Swiss homeowners can borrow more cheaply than Uncle Sam." They can and they do. From December 2007 to June of this year, Swiss mortgage debt as a share of GDP surged to 146% from 127%. (Between the first quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of 2014, chastened Americans reduced America's mortgage debt as a share of American GDP to 55% from 74%.)

In these stupendous interventions, the SNB is hardly unique. Nor is it alone as it attempts to undo, through administrative means, the distortions it creates through monetary policy. New "macro-prudential" directives have tightened standards for home-loan amortization schedules, minimum down payments, affordability, bank capital ratios, etc.

Though the UBS Swiss Real Estate Bubble Index continues to flash "risk," the mortgage market cooled a bit in the first half of the year, Philippe Béguelin, an editor at Finanz und Wirtschaft in Zurisch, advises Lorenz. Then, too, the foreign exchange market cooled late in 2013, which allowed the SNB to cease and desist from franc printing. Thus, the central bank's assets declined to CHF 492.6 billion in February from a peak of CHF 511.7 billion in March 2013.

Russia's accession of Crimea at the end of February reheated the forex market. ISIS and the Scottish referendum have continued to turn up the temperature. Business activity in China continues to dwindle (electricity production fell 2.2%, measured year-over-year, in August), and European growth registers barely above the zero line. On Sept. 4, Mario Draghi unveiled a plan for a kind of euro-zone QE. So growth in the SNB's balance sheet has resumed. In July, the latest month for which figures are available, footings reached CHF 517.3 billion in July, a new high.

"If the drumbeat of bad news continues, why wouldn't investors move more cash into Switzerland?" Lorenz inquires. "Successive rounds of easy money have made the opportunity cost of parking assets in Switzerland much lower today than at the outset of the SNB's currency ceiling. True, the Swiss 10-year yield has declined to 0.49% from 0.93% since Nov. 1, 2011. But yields on the Irish, Spanish and Greek 10 years have also plummeted--to 1.88%, 2.33% and 5.69%, respectively, from 14.08%, 7.62% and 37.1%, respectively, at their euro-panic peaks. It no longer avails the income seeker much to gamble on second- and third-tier sovereign credits. Swiss yields are at rock bottom, but so are the rest of them. On the combined, undoubted authority of Deutsche Bank, Business Insider and Bloomberg, Dutch yields stand at a 500-year low."

It's a funny old world when frightened people turn to the Swissie, which the SNB is again mass-producing, rather than to gold, which nobody can mass produce. While the franc yields something to gold's nothing, the spread is narrowing. And if as Thomas Moser, an alternate member of the SNB's policy-setting Governing Board, suggested in a Sept. 10 interview with The Wall Street Journal, the SNB finally has recourse to negative rates, the barbarous relic will outyield the franc. Way back in the 1970s, relates Christopher Fildes, a delegation of foreign newspapermen were visiting the old Union Bank of Switzerland in Zurich. In response to a casual remark about the proverbial strength of the franc, a Swiss banker scoffed. "We do not say 'as good as gold,'" declared this eminence. "Gold is not as good as the Swiss franc." And now?

A bet on a higher Swiss/euro exchange rate implies that the SNB will stop intervening. What monetary or political forces might converge to persuade the bank that a strong franc is the lesser of two or more evils? "John Bull can stand anything but he can't stand 2%," the saying goes. It's clear to listen to their anguished cries that broad segments of the life insurance industry can't stand one-half of 1%. The Tokyo Stock Exchange TOPIX Insurance Index is essentially unchanged since 1994, the year that Japan government bond yields began their inexorable slide. "We are the collateral victims of the monetary policy which has been designed to help governments and banks after the financial crisis," Denis Kessler, the CEO of Scor SE, the world's fifth-largest reinsurer, complained at a London conference on June 24. "We were not at the heart of the crisis nor did we create the crisis."

More money printing or sub-zero rates may once again set a fire under Swiss house prices, macro-prudential policies notwithstanding. It may ruin the life insurers. At some point, the Swiss National Bank would have to decide whether propping up the export sector is worth the cost. If these circumstances, a bet (and, to be clear, it is very much a bet) on the franc appreciating against the euro might pay. A three-year, at-the-money option on the franc appreciating against the euro is priced at 3.7% of notional today according to Bloomberg. To return to its high of 1.03 francs per euro on Aug. 10, 2011, the franc would appreciate by 17%.

While there is nothing especially exotic about this option, it is available only to institutional investors with an International Swaps and Derivatives Association agreement in place with a too-big-to-fail bank. For readers not so situated, there is always gold, which--in our opinion--the franc is no longer as good as.

Bottom line: as the fateful SNB episode demonstrates—there are natural limits to the policies of inflationism.

Has SNB’s actions functioned as the Causa Proxima for the Return of Global Financial Volatility?

More on Swiss National Bank’s pulling the plug on the franc-euro cap which I posted Thursday.

SNB’s governor Thomas Jordan on the discontinuation of the franc euro policy:

Recently, divergences between the monetary policies of the major currency areas have increased significantly – a trend that is likely to become even more pronounced. The euro has depreciated substantially against the US dollar and this, in turn, has caused the Swiss franc to weaken against the US dollar. In these circumstances, the SNB has concluded that enforcing and maintaining the minimum exchange rate for the Swiss franc against the euro is no longer justified.

The Wall Street Journal Real Times Economic Blog provides a list of foreign exchange brokers which suffered heavy losses from the SNB’s actions.

-FXCM Inc., the biggest retail foreign-exchange broker in the U.S. and Asia, said in a statement that because of unprecedented volatility in the euro against the Swiss franc, clients’ losses left them owing it about $225 million and that it was trying to shore up its capital. 

-In the U.K., retail broker Alpari Ltd. entered insolvency after racking up losses amid the currency turmoil following the SNB’s decision. 

-Global Brokers NZ Ltd., which is registered in New Zealand, said it would close its doors as it could no longer meet regulatory minimum-capitalization requirements of 1 million New Zealand dollars ($782,500). The firm is connected to online currency trading websites Cashback Forex, Forex Razor and Excel Markets and appears to be owned by entities in the British Virgin Islands. 

-Japan’s Finance Ministry was checking on trading firms Friday after industry sources said the country’s army of mom-and-pop foreign exchange traders suffered big losses.

Oh by the way, Swiss stocks which collapsed 8.97% on Thursday, had a follow on 5.96% meltdown on Friday. For two days the SMI has lost 14.93%! 

Stock market crashes and sharp financial volatility have become real time events!

The Swiss equity bellwether has apparently diverged from many other European stocks where the latter has rallied strongly. Last week’s stock market bids have largely been anchored on next week’s highly anticipated full scale QE from the ECB.

Nonetheless here are some interesting commentaries from various experts.

Austrian economist Patrick Barron at the Mises Canada Blog says that Switzerland has implicitly abandoned the European Monetary Union (bold mine)

Oh. You didn’t know that Switzerland was part of the European Monetary Union? You thought that the Swiss used their own currency, the Swiss franc? In a definitional sense only, you are correct. Within its monopolized currency area, the political boundaries of Switzerland, the Swiss franc is legal tender. But for approximately three years the Swiss National Bank has maintained a Swiss franc to euro ratio of 1.2 francs per euro. The usual suspects, exporters, were the driving political force behind the SNB’s policy. They feared fewer sales to eurozone countries should the franc cost more in euro terms. This policy made the European Central Bank (ECB) the determinant of monetary policy in Switzerland and relegated the Swiss National Bank to the mechanical role of currency board. When the Swiss franc started to appreciate against the euro, meaning that buyers were willing to accept fewer than 1.2 francs per euro, the Swiss National Bank printed francs and bought euros. Over the last three years as demand for Swiss francs from euro holders increased, the SNB’s balance sheet exploded with new euro reserves. However, as the world now knows, in a surprise move the SNB abandoned its currency peg policy. Today the franc exchanges approximately one for one with the euro, meaning that the franc has appreciated by approximately twenty percent against the euro.

As far as I know the SNB has made no official announcement of the reason for its surprise move. I suspect that the Swiss people had made themselves heard that they feared inflation from the ECB’s imminent quantitative easing policy.  The Swiss gold referendum on November 30 would have required their central bank to hold a fixed percent of reserves in the form of gold. It was defeated only after the major political parties and the SNB amounted a concerted anti-referendum blitz. Still in control of their own currency, it was a relatively simple matter for Switzerland, in effect,  to veto the ECB’s proposed policy by abandoning the currency peg. This shows the rest of Europe that at least one nation does not fear returning to full control of its currency nor does it fear the consequences of a temporary drop in exports. (The drop will be temporary, because Swiss import prices will fall and eurozone users will be awash with depreciated euros and willing to pay more for the Swiss franc.)

The lesson is clear. If Switzerland can retake control of its money, so can any eurozone nation. The process may take longer, as the country reissues is own currency and re-denominates its bank accounts in local currency terms, but it can be done. Already there are reports that the Danish central bank is contemplating abandoning its currency peg of approximately 7.5 krone per euro.  If the sky does not fall on Switzerland and Denmark, other nations may follow. Does anyone know how to say deutsche mark?

To visualize on the explosion of euro reserves on the SNB’s balance sheets, as of November 2014, the SNB's balance sheet has swelled to 540 billion CHF and now accounts for 80% of GDP (chart from Danske).  

Austrian economist Frank Hollenbeck at the Mises Institute notes that the surprise SNB action has been intended to shield Swiss political economy from ECB’s forthcoming irresponsible actions (emphasis added)

In theory, the Swiss could have held the floor. To keep your currency from appreciating, all you need to do is print, print print. Of course, this printing is not without consequences. With this bold move, the Swiss have crossed the Rubicon. They cannot go back. They have in dicated to speculators there is a pain threshold, or monetary expansion, that the Swiss are not willing to bear. Any attempt to set a new floor would set up a one way bet for speculators.

By pegging your currency to that of a bigger neighbor, you are essentially letting your neighbor determine your monetary policy. Dubai fixed its currency, the dirham, to the dollar and imported the US’s excessive monetary policy which led to the same real estate bubble in Dubai as the bubble in the US. In other words, by fixing your currency, you have to follow your bigger neighbor’s irresponsible monetary policy.

With the increasing likelihood that the European Central Bank would violate the Maastricht treaty and purchase sovereign debt, the Swiss finally decided they had had enough. The talk now is that the ECB will purchase over a trillion euros worth of bonds. To keep the peg, the Swiss would have had to increase the money supply by the same percentage, which would have been irresponsible monetary policy for such a small country.

By letting the peg go, Switzerland did the right thing. It should now concentrate on eliminating most EU debt from its balance sheet. There is an EU storm brewing, and Switzerland will no longer be one of the innocent bystanders.

In an interview, American entrepreneur and financial commentator Peter Schiff said that the SNB has been the first central bank to "surrender" or to back away from them global ‘currency war’. 

The transcript of the interview from LewRockwell.com (bold mine)

“First of all, it’s not just the euro that collapsed. The US dollar collapsed almost as much. I think it was the right thing to do. I think it was a mistake for the Swiss to have adopted that peg in the first place. In fact, by abandoning the peg, they’re admitting it was a mistake, because now the Swiss franc has appreciated anyway, which was something the peg was designed to prevent. Now the Swiss National Bank has tens of billions of francs worth of losses on a 500 billion plus cash of euros and dollars that they’ve accumulated to defend that ridiculous peg. Of course, had they not ended it, the losses would have mounted. If Europe launches QE, they could have lost hundreds of billions of francs…

“Central bankers rarely admit their mistakes. What’s changed? It’s not necessary because it didn’t work. It was never necessary. They probably have a much greater supply now of euros and dollars on their balance sheet than they bargained for. The prospect of having to back up the toboggans and fill them full of euros was very daunting. So they abandoned this peg, thankfully for the Swiss… Swiss people are going to benefit. Look at the drop of oil prices in terms of Swiss francs. Prices are going to come down and the Swiss are going to be that much more prosperous because of a stronger franc…

“I think that is a mistake. I don’t think they need negative interest rates. I think that is taking some of the luster off of the franc. It would be even stronger had they not done that. But a strong currency is not a bad thing. A weak currency is a bad thing. Switzerland should take pride in the strength of its currency. Now they have to deal with the losses by trying to prevent it from rising. Of course, there have been some economic mistakes made in Switzerland and elsewhere, because of this monetary policy, that now have to be corrected. Unfortunately, these were needless mistakes that didn’t have to be made. I think a lot of people are now jumping to the conclusion that Europe is going to do a big QE program, and that’s why the Swiss are backing away. Without the Swiss, I think it makes it that much more difficult for Europe to do QE. So maybe they’re not going to be able to do it, because they no longer have the Swiss to support their currency. Maybe they’ll do some more substantive economic reforms instead. That would be a positive for Europe. I think that it could mean the US is the last central bank standing with QE, because I think we’re going to be doing QE4…

“I think that you’re going to see a complete breakdown in the confidence that people have for central banking over the next several years. The Swiss were saying, ‘Over my dead body. We will defend this peg to eternity.’ Then they went around and they didn’t do it. Of course, that’s generally what central banks do. They have to deny, deny, right up until the point where they do what they were denying they were going to do. I think you have a lot of confidence and trust and faith in central bankers. I think that bubble in central bank confidence is going to burst, is going to be shattered. Particularly when it comes to the confidence people have in the Federal Reserve and in Janet Yellen, because they’ve been talking about how great the US economy is. To anyone who has been payingattention to the statistics, this mirage of a recovery, this illusion is fading fast. I think instead of the promised recovery that Janet Yellen has been talking about, we’re going to have a relapse to recession. Instead of rate hikes, we’re going to have QE4. That’s going to be the end of their credibility…

We see the same concerns even in the mainstream. 

The stock market bullish fund manager David R. Kotok chairman of Cumberland Advisors Chairman suddenly seems skittish: (bold mine)

Markets can handle good news, and they can handle bad news. Markets have trouble, however, with uncertainty. The pressure on stock markets and the volatility that has spiked due to the SNB’s move are the results of rising uncertainty about the foreign-currency-denominated debt and abrupt changes in central bank policy.

The Swiss have punched new holes in their cheese. They have boiled their chocolate so that it smells bad. They committed to a course, reversed themselves, and have now lost their credibility. This is the second governor of the Swiss central bank who has suffered a loss of credibility. The first one had to resign because a member of his household was allegedly trading a foreign currency position against the euro peg. The second governor has derailed billions in loans and pressured his citizens through his unexpected policy change.

When one central bank loses its credibility, all central banks suffer. The burdens on the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of England, and others have now intensified.

Finally, chief advisor to Allianz and economic commentator and author Mohamed El Erian, writing at the Financial Times says that the SNB’s actions looks like signs of widening cracks on the central bank induced low volatility environment: (bold added)

The implications of this historic policy turnround extend well beyond a period of bumpy economic and financial adjustment for Switzerland itself. They risk destabilising some other countries and decision-making in the neighbouring eurozone will become even more complicated and contentious.

Confirming the historical lesson that large currency moves tend to break things, they also highlight the extent to which central banks, operating in a world of growing economic and policy divergence, are struggling to maintain the paradigm of low market volatility that is central to their efforts to generate higher economic growth…

Following the abrupt removal of the currency peg, Switzerland is now looking at a period of bumpy economic and financial adjustment. Being a relatively “open economy”, in which trade and tourism play an important role, Swiss companies face a considerable competitiveness challenge ahead. The country will also have to deal with issues of currency mismatches, as well as having to battle larger, externally-induced deflationary forces.

But the implications extend far beyond Switzerland. Countries with Swiss franc denominated liabilities, such as Hungary, now have to deal with a major adverse valuation shock.

More importantly in terms of global systemic effects, politicians in the core economies within the eurozone — including Germany, Austria, Finland and the Netherlands — will see the SNB’s move as a reaffirmation of the dangers of substituting financial engineering for real economic reform. As such, they will be less willing to accommodate the hyperactivism of the ECB. And while this is unlikely to stop the ECB from doing more, it may increase the legal, reputational and unity risks it takes in doing so. 

Then there are the consequences for a global economy which, in the absence of a comprehensive policy response in the advanced world, has ended up overly reliant on central bank interventions. Given that their tools cannot reach directly and sufficiently at what holds back growth and jobs, these central banks have been forced to use the partial channel of financial asset prices to influence real economic outcomes.

To this end, central banks have sought to repress market volatility as a means of encouraging risk taking that would then boost asset prices and thus encourage greater household consumption (via the wealth effect) and corporate investment (via animal spirits). 

The SNB’s decision is further evidence that central banks are finding it harder to implement a policy of volatility repression that already was being challenged by the growing divergence in policy prospects between the eurozone and the US.

The ECB better deliver the highly expected "bazooka" next week because if not market volatility may return with a vengeance.

Yet has last week’s action by the SNB functioned as the causa proxima* for the return of global financial market volatility as the Swiss franc carry trade unravels that may lead to the breakdown of the euro and of bursting of the central banking confidence bubble?

*Causa Promixa is what historian Charles Kindleberger calls as "some incident that saps the confidence of the system" in Manias, Panics and Crashes p 104

SNB Abandons Swiss Franc Euro cap, Swiss Stock Market Crashes

In a world of central planning, all it takes to destabilize the markets is for authorities to succumb to their caprices.

The Swiss central bank, the Swiss National Bank, suddenly decides to end the 1.2 franc per euro cap.

From the Bloomberg:

The Swiss National Bank unexpectedly scrapped its three-year policy of capping the Swiss franc against the euro in a u-turn that may change the perception of a century-old institution known for reliability.

In a surprise statement that sent shockwaves through equities and currency markets, the central bank ended its cap of 1.20 franc per euro and reduced the interest rate on sight deposits, deepening a cut announced less than a month ago.

The shift marks an attempt by the SNB to reinforce its defenses of the economy before government bond purchases by the European Central Bank that could crumple the franc cap. The franc surged after the announcement, Swiss stocks including UBS AG tumbled and the chief executive of watchmaker Swatch Group AG said the policy shift would hurt exports. SNB President Thomas Jordan defended the move, saying surprise was necessary.

It’s pandemonium on Swiss financial markets as the EUR/CHF collapse.

Yields of 10 year Swiss bond collapses.

Just look at that bond yield collapse (bond rallies)! Yields of 7 year Swiss bonds turn negative! (all charts above from investing.com)

Swiss stocks, as of this writing, have crashed 10%!

As been repeatedly stated here, crashes have become real time events.

Speculations are rife that SNB actions have signified as hints to a massive ECB QE that may come next week. And has most likely been the reason for the massive swing from losses to substantial gains for other European Stocks.

(charts above from Bloomberg)

Gold has so far soared 2%. US stocks have been wildly fluctuating from losses to gains back to losses.

Curiously just last Monday the SNB said that they would maintain the franc-euro cap.

From Reuters (hat tip Zero Hedge)

The Swiss National Bank's cap on the franc at 1.20 per euro will remain its key monetary policy tool, the central bank's vice-chairman said in a television interview broadcast on Monday.

"We took stock of the situation less than a month ago, we looked again at all the parameters and we are convinced that the minimum exchange rate must remain the cornerstone of our monetary policy," Jean-Pierre Danthine told RTS.

The above is an exhibit of how financial markets have become almost entirely dependent on central bank policies.

And yet the outcome of centralization is a black swan event. So far this has been a Swiss financial markets affair. How this will affect trades and investments embedded on the franc-euro cap outside Switzerland remains to be seen.

We truly live in interesting times.

Swiss Central Bank Imposes Negative Deposit Rates!

The Keynesian euthanasia of the rentier policies of abolishing interest rates has been intensifying.

Today, the Swiss National Bank joins the ECB (June 2014) and Sweden (2009) to implement negative deposit rates supposedly intended to discourage capital flows.

From Bloomberg:

The Swiss National Bank (SNBN) imposed the country’s first negative deposit rate since the 1970s as the Russian financial crisis and the threat of further euro-zone stimulus heaped pressure on the franc.

A charge of 0.25 percent on sight deposits, the cash-like holdings of commercial banks at the central bank, will apply as of Jan. 22, the Zurich-based central bank said in a statement today. That’s the same day as the European Central Bank’s first decision of 2015.

The SNB move follows Russia’s surprise interest-rate increase this week and hints at the investment pressures that resulted after that decision failed to stem a run on the ruble. Swiss officials acted as the turmoil, along with the imminent threat of quantitative easing from the ECB, kept the franc too close to its 1.20 per euro ceiling for comfort.

As one would notice, the SNB’s has supposedly been responding to unintended consequences from previous interventions

And since every interventions create unintended economic and financial dislocations, these has prompted policymakers to apply even more interventions which furthers the imbalances. Thus one intervention begets another. The ramification of which is a massive accumulation of distortions, or malinvestments pillared on the destruction of savings or capital consumption that eventually results to a crisis

As great Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises warned in his magnum opus the Human Action (bold mine)

The age-old disapprobation of interest has been fully revived by modern interventionism. It clings to the dogma that it is one of the foremost duties of good government to lower the rate of interest as far as possible or to abolish it altogether. All present-day governments are fanatically committed to an easy money policy. As has been mentioned already, the British Government has asserted that credit expansion has performed "the miracle...of turning a stone into bread." A Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York has declared that "final freedom from the domestic money market exists for every sovereign national state where there exists an institution which functions in the manner of a modern central bank, and whose currency is not convertible into gold or into some other commodity." Many governments, universities, and institutes of economic research lavishly subsidize publications whose main purpose is to praise the blessings of unbridled credit expansion and to slander all opponents as illintentioned advocates of the selfish interests of usurers.

The wavelike movement affecting the economic system, the recurrence of periods of boom which are followed by periods of depression, is the unavoidable outcome of the attempts, repeated again and again, to lower the gross market rate of interest by means of credit expansion. There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved.

And why does it seem that we are in a crisis for central banks to resort to unprecedented emergency measures?

Naturally Wall Street love such invisible transfers—policies which confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some—as they are one of the key beneficiaries.

And so today’s continuing party.

Ron Paul: Will The Swiss Vote to Get Their Gold Back?

Will the Swiss referendum on gold reserves serve as a catalyst for a global movement to put check on arbitrary and abusive monetary and banking policies around the world?

The great Ron Paul writing at the Ron Paul Institute gives a clue (bold mine)

On November 30th, voters in Switzerland will head to the polls to vote in a referendum on gold. On the ballot is a measure to prohibit the Swiss National Bank (SNB) from further gold sales, to repatriate Swiss-owned gold to Switzerland, and to mandate that gold make up at least 20 percent of the SNB's assets. Arising from popular sentiment similar to movements in the United States, Germany, and the Netherlands, this referendum is an attempt to bring more oversight and accountability to the SNB, Switzerland's central bank.

The Swiss referendum is driven by an undercurrent of dissatisfaction with the conduct not only of Swiss monetary policy, but also of Swiss banking policy. Switzerland may be a small nation, but it is a nation proud of its independence and its history of standing up to tyranny. The famous legend of William Tell embodies the essence of the Swiss national character. But no tyrannical regime in history has bullied Switzerland as much as the United States government has in recent years.

The Swiss tradition of bank secrecy is legendary. The reality, however, is that Swiss bank secrecy is dead. Countries such as the United States have been unwilling to keep government spending in check, but they are running out of ways to fund that spending. Further taxation of their populations is politically difficult, massive issuance of government debt has saturated bond markets, and so the easy target is smaller countries such as Switzerland which have gained the reputation of being “tax havens.” Remember that tax haven is just a term for a country that allows people to keep more of their own money than the US or EU does, and doesn't attempt to plunder either its citizens or its foreign account-holders. But the past several years have seen a concerted attempt by the US and EU to crack down on these smaller countries, using their enormous financial clout to compel them to hand over account details so that they can extract more tax revenue.

The US has used its court system to extort money from Switzerland, fining the US subsidiaries of Swiss banks for allegedly sheltering US taxpayers and allowing them to keep their accounts and earnings hidden from US tax authorities. EU countries such as Germany have even gone so far as to purchase account information stolen from Swiss banks by unscrupulous bank employees. And with the recent implementation of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), Swiss banks will now be forced to divulge to the IRS all the information they have about customers liable to pay US taxes.

On the monetary policy front, the SNB sold about 60 percent of Switzerland's gold reserves during the 2000s. The SNB has also in recent years established a currency peg, with 1.2 Swiss francs equal to one euro. The peg's effects have already manifested themselves in the form of a growing real estate bubble, as housing prices have risen dangerously. Given the action by the European Central Bank (ECB) to engage in further quantitative easing, the SNB's continuance of this dangerous and foolhardy policy means that it will continue tying its monetary policy to that of the EU and be forced to import more inflation into Switzerland. 

Just like the US and the EU, Switzerland at the federal level is ruled by a group of elites who are more concerned with their own status, well-being, and international reputation than with the good of the country. The gold referendum, if it is successful, will be a slap in the face to those elites. The Swiss people appreciate the work their forefathers put into building up large gold reserves, a respected currency, and a strong, independent banking system. They do not want to see centuries of struggle squandered by a central bank. The results of the November referendum may be a bellwether, indicating just how strong popular movements can be in establishing central bank accountability and returning gold to a monetary role.

A “Yes” vote may also extrapolate to higher gold prices and possibly along with it the Swiss Franc.

Swiss National Bank’s Currency Interventions Spawns Property Bubble

The unintended consequences from massive currency interventions conducted by the Swiss National bank, designed to curb huge inflows from a capital diaspora in the Eurozone by putting a ceiling on the euro, has apparently spawned a monster property bubble.

From Bloomberg,

Thomas Jordan’s fight to protect the Swiss economy is set to widen beyond currency markets and too- big-to fail risks as the central bank chairman considers how to curb the biggest real-estate boom in two decades.

The Swiss National Bank may act to stem what it called risks from “excessive credit growth,” economists from Bank Sarasin to UniCredit Group said. An option available to the central bank would be to force lenders to hold additional capital of as much as 2.5 percent of their domestic risk- weighted assets to help buffer against losses.

The SNB has already put a cap on the franc to counter the currency’s ascent and protect the economy. After leading efforts to boost capital requirements for UBS AG (UBSN) and Credit Suisse Group AG (CSGN), the country’s two largest banks, Jordan is now turning his focus to smaller lenders as the risk of a significant drop in property prices increases.

“The SNB has been warning for quite a while of a real- estate bubble and it wants to see a cooling,” said Andreas Venditti, a senior analyst at Zuercher Kantonalbank in Zurich. “It’s very possible that the buffer will be implemented before the end of the year.”

In the SNB’s June Financial Stability Report, which also called on Credit Suisse, Switzerland’s second-largest bank, to boost its capital, the central bank said the mortgage market poses a significant risk to Swiss lenders. Home loans have increased by almost 300 billion francs ($307 billion) in a decade and gained 5.2 percent last year to 797.8 billion francs. That’s about 140 percent of Swiss gross domestic product.

Surging Prices

The cost of owner-occupied apartments with as many as five rooms has risen the most over the past 10 years, with prices jumping 40 percent, SNB data shows. Prices of rental apartments have increased 29 percent.

UBS and Credit Suisse had combined outstanding mortgages of 240.6 billion francs at the end of 2011, up 2.8 percent from the previous year. Cantonal banks, which are largely owned by the regions, had a 6 percent increase, while the cooperative-based Raiffeisen banks saw mortgages surge 7.4 percent.

UBS said on July 31 that if property values fell by 20 percent, 99.7 percent of its exposure to Swiss real estate would remain covered by collateral. While prices are still climbing in some regions, “at this time, we don’t believe this could destabilize the Swiss economy or cause major losses for UBS,” Chief Financial Officer Tom Naratil said.

Chart courtesy of La Chronique de Crottaz Finance

To what extent has the SNB expanded their balance sheet?

Here’s the Financial Times,

Foreign exchange reserves rose to SFr406bn ($419.7bn) last month, up from SFr365bn in June, marking the third consecutive month that the Swiss National Bank has been forced to add tens of billions to its balance sheet in its efforts to weaken the Swiss currency.

The SNB has had a policy of keeping the franc at a ceiling against the euro of SFr1.20 since September and has vowed to buy as many euros as necessary to prevent the franc from strengthening beyond that level.

Recent interventions in the forex market have seen the SNB’s balance sheet expand to record levels. Forex reserves have risen 71 per cent since April, the latest figures show.

The credit boom seems to have percolated into the stock market too.

As of yesterday the Swiss Market Index has returned 9% and about 29% from the trough last August or about a year ago.

And considering that the growth of SNB’s balance sheet has vastly outpaced the the US Federal Reserve and other major central banks, the Swiss franc has even weakened substantially against the US dollar.

Taking cue from the Great Depression, the distinguished dean of Austrian economics Murray N. Rothbard wrote,

The trouble did not lie with particular credit on particular markets (such as stock or real estate); the boom in the stock and real estate markets reflected Mises's trade cycle: a disproportionate boom in the prices of titles to capital goods, caused by the increase in money supply attendant upon bank credit expansion

Yet if the SNB succeeds to restrain the banking system’s unsustainable credit expansion then a bust should be expected.

The boom-bust (Austrian Business) cycle as explained by the great Professor Ludwig von Mises,

But the boom cannot continue indefinitely. There are two alternatives. Either the banks continue the credit expansion without restriction and thus cause constantly mounting price increases and an ever-growing orgy of speculation, which, as in all other cases of unlimited inflation, ends in a “crack-up boom” and in a collapse of the money and credit system. Or the banks stop before this point is reached, voluntarily renounce further credit expansion and thus bring about the crisis. The depression follows in both instances.

In a fiat money central banking standard, boom bust cycles have been the dominant landscape.

Gold is Money: Will a Swiss Gold Franc Emerge?

Gold may not be money today but parts of the world seem to be exploring the incorporation of gold to their respective monetary system (e.g. Malaysia’s Islamic gold dinar).

From the IBTimes.com

The Swiss parliament was scheduled to debate Tuesday the wisdom of creating a new gold-backed national coin that would float in parallel with the Swiss franc, becoming the first national legislature in decades to consider issuing a currency based on a commodity.

The proposal was first introduced in March 2011 by three right-wing legislators as part of what they termed a "healthy currency" initiative. It seeks to modify the Swiss constitution, instructing the nation's central bank to issue a new national coin with a fixed gold content that would complement, though not replace, the Swiss franc.

A press release described the legislative action as seeking "an attractive alternative to the Swiss franc as a safe haven, given how franc appreciation has continued as a result of currency turmoil outside Swiss international borders." The move would reduce some policy-making power from the Swiss National Bank, the nation's issuer of legal tender, by forcing it to issue a currency at a fixed rate to gold.

The mainstream may not like it, but forces of decentralization appear to ushering in the gold standard. Once a major economy, like Switzerland, successfully brings the gold standard partly back in operation, then gradually more nations (most likely emerging markets) can be expected more to hop in.

Hot: Swiss National Bank Intervenes to Halt a Surging Franc

My skepticism about the Swiss franc has been validated. You simply just can’t trust central bankers. Not even the Swiss variety.

The Swiss National Bank (SNB) surprised the currency market as it intervened by ‘injecting liquidity’ in an attempt to forestall the upsurge of the franc.

The SNB apparently went ahead of the Japanese who are mulling to do the same.

From the Marketwatch (bold emphasis mine)

The Swiss National Bank on Wednesday moved to halt the rise of the Swiss franc, saying the strength of the currency was "threatening the development of the economy and increasing the downside risks to price stability in Switzerland." The euro EURCHF +2.08% jumped 1.8% versus the Swiss currency to trade at 1.1061 francs, while the U.S. dollar USDCHF +1.80% jumped 1.4% to 77.61 centimes. Calling the franc "massively overvalued at present," the SNB said it would move its target for three-month Libor as close to zero as possible, narrowing the taret range to 0% to 0.25% from 0% to 0.75%.

The SNB said it will simultaneously "very significantly increase" the supply of liquidity to the Swiss franc money market over the next few days, and that it aims to expand banks' sight deposits at the SNB from around 30 billion Swiss francs to 80 billion Swiss francs. In a statement the central bank said it is "keeping a close watch on developments on the foreign exchange market and will take further measures against the strength of the Swiss franc if necessary."

Under such environment gold prices continue to streak at fresh record levels, which as of this writing has been drifting around the 1,665-1,670 range

from Kitco.com

I would suspect that part of this intervention, aside from publicly wishing for a weaker franc, is to flood the system with money to mitigate the losses being endured by European equity markets.

My guess is that the US will be next pretty soon.

Is the Swiss Franc Better than Gold?

For the Economist the answer seems to be a yes

WHEN the going gets tough, investors buy two assets: gold and the Swiss franc. Gold's all-time peak in real terms was in 1980 when inflationary fears were particularly intense. That followed a long period of Swiss-franc strength in the 1970s, which forced the government to impose negative interest rates in a bid to dissuade foreigners from opening bank accounts in the currency. With investors now worried about European sovereign debt and the crisis over the American debt ceiling, it is not surprising that both assets are popular again. Gold has been hitting nominal highs, while the Swiss franc has reached a record in real trade-weighted terms (ie, against the country’s trading partners). The Swiss have both a fiscal and a current-account surplus, a low inflation rate and a relatively low debt-to-GDP ratio.

The Swiss Franc-gold correlation seems to be playing out a cycle.

In the two decades of the gold bear market during the early 80s until the late 90s, the Franc (CHF) has substantially outperformed gold. The middle green circle highlights this phenomenon by exhibiting the widest variance.

However, the recent rally in gold prices has been closing this gap, as shown by the gold ellipse on the right.

In the early 70s we saw a similar gap-closing dynamic by gold. This eventually culminated with gold topping out in the early 80s (red oblong-left).

It can be argued that based on the above chart, where in the stretch of 4 decades the Franc (CHF) has predominated gold, the Swiss currency has indeed been a ‘better’ safehaven option.

And a major additional reason, which the Economist above didn’t cite, is that Switzerland has the largest gold reserves per person (shown below)

Chart from the Economist

In short, the strength of the Franc can partly be attributed to its gold reserves.

Nonetheless, it is unclear if history would repeat or rhyme.

Given that the Swiss Central Bank has shown to be equally susceptible to inflating their currency, as recently prompted for by the Greece crisis, and like any nation operating on the central bank system, I am doubtful of the Franc-gold correlation “returning to the mean”.

This would depend entirely on monetary politics or how the Swiss Central Bank -government would respond to the unfolding events

The gap-closing trend by gold relative to the Franc, as indicated above, can be seen more clearly in this 3 year chart from stockcharts.com.

Bottom line: Since I am leery of central banking whom are prone or inclined to use their vaunted weapon (of money printing), I’d stick to gold.

Post Script:

The Philippine Peso seems no match to the Franc. (chart from Yahoo finance)

This just exhibits how relatively more inflationary the Peso (undergirded by obnoxious Philippine politics) has been.

Evidence Of Inflationism: Competitive Devaluation In The Eurozone

Here is an example why the paper money-central banking regime is in peril or can't be expected to last. And also why we should expect inflation, in spite of the recent market volatility.

This from Bloomberg, (bold highlights mine)

``Swiss central bank president Philipp Hildebrand is finding himself in a tug of war with currency markets and he may be on the losing side.

``Concern that the Greek fiscal crisis will spread through the euro area is pitching the Swiss National Bank against investors, forcing the Zurich-based central bank to sell francs at an unprecedented pace to fight the currency’s appreciation against the euro. With the SNB’s foreign-currency holdings now accounting for 68 percent of its balance sheet, economists say Hildebrand may have to spend even more to maintain the resistance.

“Greece is giving the SNB a major headache,” said David Kohl, deputy chief economist at Julius Baer Holding AG in Frankfurt. “We expect the SNB to continue to lean against the appreciation for as long as possible, but they won’t be able to keep up the pace of currency purchases much longer.”

``Hildebrand is already stepping up the fight as the franc strengthened to a record 1.4003 per euro on May 17, 14 months since the SNB began its intervention campaign to insulate Swiss exports and deflect deflation threats. The central bank added 28.5 billion francs ($24.6 billion) to its currency reserves in April, the biggest increase in at least 13 years, as Greece’s turmoil undermined the euro."

``The franc has strengthened 5 percent against the currency of the 16-nation region in the last six months."

Global central banks like the US Fed, the ECB and the SNB as shown above, are not only printing money in massive scale but absorbing assets of dubious quality...

Swiss Franc-Euro Trend

...with the aim of maintaining certain exchange rate levels for whatever goals (yes interventionism is always politically designed, but camouflaged by economic intent).

The problem is that market interventions almost always lead to unintended consequences.

A warning from Ludwig von Mises, (bold highlights mine)

``If one looks at devaluation not with the eyes of an apologist of government and union policies, but with the eyes of an economist, one must first of all stress the point that all its alleged blessings are temporary only. Moreover, they depend on the condition that only one country devalues while the other countries abstain from devaluing their own currencies. If the other countries devalue in the same proportion, no changes in foreign trade appear. If they devalue to a greater extent, all these transitory blessings, whatever they may be, favor them exclusively. A general acceptance of the principles of the flexible standard must therefore result in a race between the nations to outbid one another. At the end of this competition is the complete destruction of all nations' monetary systems."

When the public awakens to the reality that central bank balance sheets represents as the "emperor with no clothes" and that the power to tax has reached its limit, then the crack-up boom is likely to emerge.