The BSP’s One-Two Punch: Can RRR Cuts and PDIC Deposit Insurance Avert a Liquidity Crisis?

Historical research on bank runs indicates that the reason people run is run is not fear of people running. People typically ran when the bank was already insolvent. Healthy purpose of closing the bank before the bank lost even more money. True, the losses were unevenly distributed, depending on whether you got on the front of the line or the back of the line. In a way, that provides a useful incentive mechanism: monitor your bank and don't rely on other people to monitor it for you—Lawrence White

In this issue

The BSP’s One-Two Punch: Can RRR Cuts and PDIC Deposit Insurance Avert a Liquidity Crisis?

I. From Full Reserves to Fractional Banking: The Risks of a Zero-Bound RRR

II. Has the BSP’s "Easing Cycle"—Particularly the RRR Cut—Eased Liquidity Strains?

III. Bank Assets: A Tale of Contradictions: Booming Loans and Liquidity Pressures

IV. Bank Credit Boom Amid Contradictions: Soaring Credit Card NPLs as Real Estate NPLs Ease

V. Investments: A Key Source of Liquidity Pressures

VI. Hidden Risks in Held-to-Maturity (HTM) Securities: Government Debt

VII. Slowing Deposit Growth and the Structural Changes in the Banking System’s Asset Distribution

VIII. Liquidity Constraints Fuels Bank Borrowing Frenzy

IX. PDIC’s Doubled Deposit Insurance: A Confidence Tool or a Risk Mitigant?

X. Conclusion: Band-aid Solutions Magnify Risks

The BSP’s One-Two Punch: Can RRR Cuts and PDIC Deposit Insurance Avert a Liquidity Crisis?

Facing the risks from lower bank reserve requirements, the BSP may have pulled a confidence trick by doubling deposit insurance. But will it be enough to avert the ongoing liquidity stress?

I. From Full Reserves to Fractional Banking: The Risks of a Zero-Bound RRR 

Full reserve banking originated during the gold standard era, where banks acted as custodians of gold deposits and issued paper receipts fully backed by gold reserves. This system ensured financial stability by preventing the expansion of money beyond available reserves. However, as banks realized that depositors rarely withdrew all their funds simultaneously, they began lending out a portion of deposits, leading to the emergence of fractional reserve banking.

Over time, governments institutionalized this practice, largely due to its political convenience—enabling the financing of wars, welfare programs, and other government expenditures. This shift was epitomized by 1896 Democratic presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan's famous speech in which he declared, "You shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold!" 

Governments reinforced this transition through the creation of central banks and an expanding framework of regulations, including deposit insurance. Ultimately, these policies culminated in the abandonment of the gold standard, most notably with the Nixon Shock of August 1971. 

While fractional reserve banking has facilitated economic growth by expanding credit, it has also introduced significant risks. These include bank runs and liquidity crises, as seen during the Great Depression, the 2008 financial crisis, and the 2023 U.S. banking crisis; inflationary pressures from excessive credit creation; and moral hazard, where banks engage in riskier practices knowing they may be bailed out. 

The system’s reliance on high leverage further contributes to financial fragility. 

The risks of fractional reserve banking are amplified when the statutory reserve requirement (RRR) approaches zero. A zero-bound RRR effectively removes regulatory constraints on the proportion of deposits banks can lend, increasing liquidity risk if sudden withdrawals exceed available reserves. 

This heightens the probability of bank runs, making institutions more dependent on central bank intervention for stability. 

Additionally, a near-zero RRR expands the money multiplier effect, increasing the risks of excessive credit creation, exacerbating asset-liability mismatches, fueling asset bubbles, and intensifying inflationary pressures—ultimately turning individual failures into systemic vulnerabilities that repeatedly require central bank intervention. 

Without reserve requirements, banking stability relies entirely on the presumed effectiveness of capital adequacy regulations, liquidity buffers, and central bank oversight, increasing systemic dependence on monetary authorities—further assuming they possess both full knowledge and predictive capabilities (or some combination thereof) necessary to contain or prevent disorderly outcomes arising from the buildup of unsustainable financial and economic imbalances (The knowledge problem). 

Moreover, increased reliance on these authorities leads to greater politicization of financial institutions, fostering inefficiencies such as corruption, regulatory capture, and the revolving door between policymakers and industry players—further distorting market incentives and deepening systemic fragility. 

Consequently, while a zero-bound RRR enhances short-term credit availability, it also raises long-term risks of financial instability and contagion during crises. 

At its core, zero-bound RRR magnifies the inherent fragility of fractional reserve banking, increasing systemic risks and reliance on central bank intervention. By removing a key buffer against liquidity shocks, it transforms banking into a highly unstable system prone to crises. 

II. Has the BSP’s "Easing Cycle"—Particularly the RRR Cut—Eased Liquidity Strains?

Businessworld, March 15, 2025: THE PHILIPPINE BANKING industry’s total assets jumped by 9.3% year on year as of end-January, preliminary data from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) showed. Banks’ combined assets rose to P27.11 trillion as of end-January from P24.81 trillion in the same period a year ago. Month on month, total assets slid by 1.2% from P27.43 trillion as of end-December. 

In the second half (2H) of 2024, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) launched its "easing cycle," implementing three interest rate cuts and reducing the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) on October 25.

A second RRR reduction is scheduled for March 28, 2025, coinciding with the Philippine Deposit Insurance Corporation (PDIC) doubling its deposit insurance coverage, effective March 15.

Yet, despite these measures, the Philippine GDP growth slowed to 5.2% in 2H 2024—a puzzling decline amid record-high public spending, unprecedented employment rates, and historic consumer-led bank borrowing. 

Has the BSP’s easing cycle, particularly the RRR cuts, alleviated the liquidity strains plaguing the banking system? The evidence suggests otherwise. 

III. Bank Assets: A Tale of Contradictions: Booming Loans and Liquidity Pressures 

Philippine bank assets consist of cash, loans, investments, real and other properties acquired (ROPA), and other assets. In January 2025, cash, loans, and investments dominated, accounting for 9.8%, 54.2%, and 28.3% respectively—totaling 92.3% of assets.

Figure 1

Loan growth has been robust. The net total loan portfolio (including interbank loans IBLs and reverse repos RRPs) surged from a 10.7% year-on-year (YoY) increase in January 2024 to 13.7% in January 2025.

As a matter of fact, loans have consistently outpaced deposit growth since hitting a low in February 2022, with the loans-to-deposit ratio accelerating even before the BSP’s first rate cut in August 2024. (Figure 1, topmost graph)

Historical trends, however, reveal a nuanced picture.

Loan growth decelerated when the BSP hiked rates in 2018 and continued to slow even after the BSP started cutting rates. Weak loan demand at the time overshadowed the liquidity boost from RRR cuts. (Figure 1, middle image)

Despite the BSP reducing the RRR from 19% in March 2018 to 12% in April 2020—coinciding with the onset of the pandemic—loan growth remained weak relative to deposit expansion. 

It wasn’t until the BSP's unprecedented bank bailout package—including RRR cuts, a historic Php 2.3 trillion liquidity injection, record-low interest rates, USD/PHP cap, and various bank subsidies and relief programs—that bank lending conditions changed dramatically. 

Loan growth surged even amid rising rates, underscoring the impact of these interventions. 

Last year’s combination of RRR and interest rate cuts deepened the easy money environment, accelerating credit expansion. 

The question remains: why? 

IV. Bank Credit Boom Amid Contradictions: Soaring Credit Card NPLs as Real Estate NPLs Ease 

Authorities claim credit delinquencies remain "low and manageable" despite a January 2025 uptick. Since peaking in Q2 2021, gross and net NPLs, along with distressed assets, have declined from their highs. (Figure 1, lowest chart)

Figure 2

This stability is striking given record-high consumer credit—the banking system’s fastest-growing segment—occurring alongside slowing consumer spending.  (Figure 2, topmost window)

While credit card non-performing loans (NPLs) have surged, their relatively small weight in the system has muted their overall impact.

Real estate NPLs have paradoxically stabilized despite a deflationary spiral in property prices in Q3 2024.

Real estate GDP fell to just 3% in Q4—its lowest level since the pandemic recession—dragging its share of total GDP to an all-time low. (Figure 2, middle visual)

Record bank borrowings, a faltering GDP, and price deflation amidst stable NPLs—this represents 'benchmark-ism,' or 'putting lipstick on a statistical pig,' at its finest.

Ironically, surging loan growth and low NPLs should signal a banking industry awash in liquidity and profits.

Yet how much of unpublished NPLs have been contributing to the bank's liquidity pressures?

Still, more contradictory evidence.

V. Investments: A Key Source of Liquidity Pressures 

Bank investments, another major asset class, grew at a substantially slower pace, dropping from 10.7% YoY in December 2024 to 5.85% in January 2025.

This deceleration stemmed from a sharp slowdown in Available-for-Sale (AFS) assets (from 20.45% to 12% YoY) and Held-for-Trading (HFT) assets, which, despite a 22.17% YoY rise, slumped from December’s 117% spike. This suggests banks may have suffered losses from short-term speculative activities, potentially linked to the PSEi 30’s 11.8% YoY and 10.2% MoM plunge in January. (Figure 2, lowest chart)

Ironically, the Financial Index—comprising seven listed banks—rose 15.23% YoY and 0.72% MoM, indicating that losses in bank financial assets stemmed from non-financial equity holdings.

Figure 3

Despite easing interest rates, market losses on the banks’ fixed-income trading portfolios remained elevated, improving (33.5% YoY) only slightly from Php 42.4 billion in December to Php 38 billion in January. (Figure 3, topmost pane) 

VI. Hidden Risks in Held-to-Maturity (HTM) Securities: Government Debt 

Yet, HTM assets declined just 0.5% YoY. Given that 10-year PDS rates remain elevated, HTMs are likely to reach new record highs soon. (Figure 3, middle image)

Banks play a pivotal role in supporting the BSP’s liquidity injections by monetizing government securities. Their holdings of government debt (net claims on central government—NcoCG) reached an estimated 33% of total assets in January 2025—a record high.  (Figure 3, lowest graph)

Figure 4

Public debt hit a fresh record of Php 16.3 trillion last January 2025. (Figure 4, topmost diagram)

Valued at amortized cost, HTM securities mask unrealized losses, potentially straining liquidity. Overexposure to long-duration HTMs amplifies these risks, while rising government debt holdings heighten banks’ sensitivity to sovereign risk.

With NCoCG at a record high, this tells us that banks' HTMs are about to carve out another fresh milestone in the near future.

In short, losses from market placements and ballooning HTMs have offset the liquidity surge from a lending boom, undermining the BSP’s easing efforts.

VII. Slowing Deposit Growth and the Structural Changes in the Banking System’s Asset Distribution

Deposit growth should ideally mirror credit expansion, as newly issued money eventually finds its way into deposit accounts.

Sure, the informal economy remains a considerable segment. However, unless a huge amount of savings is stored in jars or piggy banks, it’s unlikely to keep a leash on the money multiplier.

The BSP’s Financial Inclusion data shows that more than half of the population has some form of debt outside the banking system. This tells us that credit delinquencies are substantially understated—even from the perspective of the informal economy

Yet, bank deposit liabilities grew from 7.05% YoY in December 2024 to 6.8% in January 2025, led by peso deposits (7% YoY), while FX deposits slowed from 7.14% to 6.14%. Peso deposits comprised 82.8% of total liabilities. (Figure 4, middle image)

Since 2018, deposit growth has been on a structural downtrend, with RRR cuts failing to reverse this trend. (Figure 4, lowest visual)

Figure 5

The gap between the total loan portfolio (excluding RRPs and IBLs) and savings widened, with TLP growth rising from 12.7% to 13.54% YoY, while savings growth doubled from 3.3% to 6.8%. (Figure 5, topmost graph)

How did these affect the bank’s cash reserves?

Despite the October 2024 RRR cut, cash reserves contracted 1.44% YoY in January 2025. In peso terms, cash levels rebounded slightly from an October 2024 interim low—mirroring 2019 troughs—but this bounce appears to be stalling. (Figure 5, middle chart)

The ongoing liquidity drain has effectively erased the BSP’s historic cash injections.

The bank's cash and due-to-bank deposits ratio has hardly bounced despite the RRR cuts from 2018 to the present! (Figure 5, lowest pane)

Figure 6

Liquidity constraints are further evident in the declining liquid-to-deposit assets ratio. (Figure 6, topmost pane)

In perspective, the structural changes in operations have led to a pivotal shift in the distribution of the bank's assets. (Figure 6, middle graph)

Cash’s share of bank assets has shrunk from 23.1% in October 2013 to 9.8% in January 2025.

While the share of loans grew from 45.3% in November 2010 to a peak of 58.98% in May, it dropped to a low of 51.6% in March 2024 before partially recovering.

Meanwhile, investments, rebounding from a 21.42% trough in June 2020, have plateaued since the BSP’s 2022 rescue package.

Still, the Philippine banking system continues to amass significant economic and political clout, effectively monopolizing the industry, as its share of total financial resources reached 83.64% in 2024. How does this mounting concentration risk translate to stability? (Figure 6, lowest chart)

VIII. Liquidity Constraints Fuels Bank Borrowing Frenzy 

In addition to the 'easy money' effect of fractional banking's money multiplier, banks still require financing for their lending operations.

Figure 7

Evidence of growing liquidity constraints, exacerbated by insufficient deposit growth, is seen in banks' aggressive borrowing from capital markets. 

Bank borrowing, comprising bills and bonds payable, reached a new record of PHP 1.78 trillion in January, marking a 47.02% year-over-year increase and a 6.5% month-over-month rise! (Figure 7, topmost diagram) 

Notably, bills payable experienced a 67% growth surge, while bonds payable increased by 17.5%.  The strong performance of bank borrowing has resulted in an increase in their share of overall bank liabilities, with bills payable now accounting for 5.1% and bonds payable for 2.43% in January. (Figure 7, middle pane) 

In essence, banks are competing fiercely among themselves, with non-bank clients, and the government to secure funding from the public's strained savings. 

Moreover, although general reverse repo usage has decreased, largely due to BSP actions, interbank reverse repos have surged to their second-highest level since September 2024. (Figure 7, lowest chart) 

The increasing scale of bank borrowings, supported by BSP liquidity data, reinforces our view that banks are struggling to maintain system stability. 

IX. PDIC’s Doubled Deposit Insurance: A Confidence Tool or a Risk Mitigant? 

The doubling of the Philippine Deposit Insurance Corporation's (PDIC) deposit insurance coverage took effect on March 15th. 

The public is largely unaware that this measure is linked to the second phase of the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) cut scheduled for March 28th. 

In essence, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), through its attached agency the PDIC, is utilizing the enhanced deposit insurance as a confidence-building measure to reinforce stability within the banking system. 

Inquirer.net, March 15, 2025: The Philippine Deposit Insurance Corp. (PDIC)—which is mandated to safeguard money kept in bank accounts —finally implemented the new maximum deposit insurance coverage (MDIC) of P1 million per depositor per bank, which was double the previous coverage of P500,000. The expanded MDIC is projected to fully insure over 147 million accounts in 2025, or 98.6 percent of the total deposit accounts in the local banking system. In terms of amount, depositor funds amounting to P5.3 trillion will be safeguarded by the PDIC, accounting for 24.1 percent of the total deposits held by the banking sector. To compare, the ratio of insured accounts under the old MDIC was at 97.6 percent as of December 2024. In terms of amount, the share of insured funds to total deposits was at 18.4 percent before. It was the amendments to the PDIC charter back in 2022 that allowed the state insurer to adjust the MDIC based on inflation and other relevant economic indicators without the need for a new law. (bold added)

ABS-CBN News, March 14: PDIC President Roberto Tan also assured the public that PDIC has enough funds to cover all depositors even with a higher MDIC. The Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) is around P237 billion as of December 2024. The ration of DIF to the estimated insured deposits (EID) is 5% this 2025, which Tan said remains adequate to meet potential insurance risks. (bold added) 

Our Key Takeaways: 

1) An Increase in Compensation rather than Coverage Ratio, Yet Systemic Coverage Remains Low

-The total insured deposit amount is capped at PHP 1 million per depositor.

98.6% of accounts are fully insured, up from 97.6% previously.

-The insured deposit amount increased to PHP 5.3 trillion (24.1% of total deposits) from PHP 3.56 trillion (18.4%) prior to the MDIC.

2) Systemic Risk and Vulnerabilities

-Most of the increase in insured deposits stems from small accounts.

-Large corporate and high-net-worth individual deposits remain largely uninsured, maintaining systemic vulnerability.

3) PDIC’s Coverage Limitations

-The PDIC only covers BSP-ordered closures, excluding losses due to fraud.

-If bank failures are triggered by fraud (e.g., misreported loan books, hidden losses), depositor panic may escalate before the PDIC intervenes.

-Runs on solvent banks could still occur if system trust weakens.

Figure/Table 8 

4) Mathematical Constraints on PDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) and Assets

-The PDIC's 2023 total assets of PHP 339.6 billion account for only 1.74% of total deposits. (Figure/Table 8)

-The Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) of PHP 237 billion represents a mere 6.7% of insured deposits.

-PDIC assets and DIF account for 3.46% and 2.42% of the deposit base of the four PSEi 30 banks.

-In the event of a mid-to-large bank failure, the DIF would be insufficient, necessitating government or BSP intervention.

5) The Systemic Policy Blind Spot

-Such policy assumes an "orderly" distribution of bank failures—small banks failing, not large ones. In reality, tail risks (big bank failures) drive financial crises, not small-bank failures.

6) Impact of RRR Cuts on Risk-Taking Behavior

-The second leg of the RRR cut in March 2025 injects liquidity, potentially encouraging higher risk-taking by banks.

-Once again, the increase in deposit insurance likely serves as a confidence tool rather than a genuine risk mitigant.

7) Rising risk due to moral hazard: The increased insurance may encourage riskier behavior by both depositors and banks.

8) Consequences of Significant Bank Failures

-If funds are insufficient, the Bureau of Treasury might cover the DIF gap. Such a bailout would expand the fiscal deficit, with the BSP likely to monetize debt.

-A more likely scenario is that the BSP intervenes directly, as the PDIC is an agency of the BSP, by rescuing depositors through liquidity injections or monetary expansion.

In both scenarios, this would amplify inflation risks and the devaluation of the Philippine peso, likely exacerbated by increased capital flight and a higher risk premium on peso assets. 

X. Conclusion: Band-aid Solutions Magnify Risks 

The BSP’s easing cycle has fueled a lending boom, masked NPL risks, and propped up government debt holdings, yet liquidity remains elusive. Cash reserves are shrinking, deposit growth is faltering, and banks are borrowing heavily to stay afloat. 

The PDIC’s insurance hike offers little systemic protection, leaving the banking system vulnerable to tail risks. A mid-to-large bank failure would likely burden the government or BSP, triggering further unintended consequences. 

As contradictions mount, a critical question persists: can this stealth loose financial environment sustain itself, or is it a prelude to a deeper crisis?

 

Mounting Cracks in the PSEi 30: How Structural Imbalances Are Amplifying Market Stress

True confidence does not come from “you can trust us if we screw up because someone else will bail you out” but from “you can trust us because it is demonstrably in our interest to make sure we don’t screw up”. Deposit insurance is an inferior confidence product – one might even say, a confidence trick—Kevin Dowd 

In this issue

Mounting Cracks in the PSEi 30: How Structural Imbalances Are Amplifying Market Stress

I. The PSEi 30’s February and 2025 Performance

II. PSE’s Market Internals Remain Bearish

III. Is This a Regional Trend? Emerging Signs of Asian Financial Crisis 2.0?

IV. PSEi 30’s Mounting Market Imbalances

V. Symptoms of Capital Consumption: Despite Surging Credit Expansion, Falling Liquidity and Diminishing Returns

VI. Share Buybacks as Panacea?

VII. The Path to Full-Fractional Reserve Banking and Deposit Insurance Expansion: A False Sense of Security? 

Mounting Cracks in the PSEi 30: How Structural Imbalances Are Amplifying Market Stress 

The erosion of a major rally this February following January’s selloff reveals the underlying structural fragilities and operating dynamics of the Philippine Stock Exchange.

I. The PSEi 30’s February and 2025 Performance

Figure 1

Echoing January’s 4.01% end-of-month selloff, the final trading day of February saw a similar 2.06% pre-closing plunge, erasing nearly half of the recovery gains the PSEi 30 had posted for the month. (Figure 1, upper and lower images)

While it may be convenient to attribute this last-minute market move to portfolio rebalancing, it primarily reflected underlying trend weakness and growing fragility in the PSEi 30.

A portion of January 2025’s selloff was driven by changes in PSEi membership.

In contrast, February’s decline was largely fueled by massive foreign money outflows.

Despite this, the headline index ended February up 2.31% month-over-month (MoM), yet remained down 13.63% year-over-year (YoY) and was still 8.13% lower year-to-date (YTD) in 2025.

II. PSE’s Market Internals Remain Bearish

Why do internal market activities signal a bearish backdrop?

Figure 2

1. Weak Volume Trend

Despite a 7.6% improvement in the PSE’s two-month gross volume, it marked the third-lowest level since 2012, reinforcing a volume downtrend that has persisted since 2015. The 2021 volume spike—an anomaly fueled by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP)’s Php 2.3 trillion historic injections into the financial system—merely highlighted the short-lived effects of the banking system’s pandemic-era rescue. (Figure 2, topmost diagram)

2. Broad-Based Selling Pressure

The two-month selling spree has been widespread. Market breadth, as measured by the advance-decline spread, recorded its second-worst performance since the pandemic crash of March 2020. (Figure 2, middle graph)

3 Persistent Foreign Outflows

In 2025, foreign outflows accounted for the third-largest capital exodus since 2012. Foreign trade made up 50.8% of gross volume, highlighting that selling pressure in the PSEi 30 was exacerbated by weak local investor support. Foreign capital has played the role of the marginal price setter, and its exit underscores the lack of domestic buying power or the dearth of local savings. (Figure 2, lowest chart) 

III. Is This a Regional Trend? Emerging Signs of Asian Financial Crisis 2.0?

Figure 3

The sustained foreign money outflow suggests that the phenomenon extends beyond the Philippines.

In 2025, the PSEi 30 ranked as the third-worst-performing equity benchmark in Asia. (Figure 3 topmost and middle graphs)

More broadly, the four largest ASEAN indices have exhibited pronounced weakness since Q3 2024.

If this trend continues, it could lay the groundwork for a potential Asian Financial Crisis 2.0. 

IV. PSEi 30’s Mounting Market Imbalances 

A deeper look at the PSEi 30 reveals intensifying distortions: 

The Financial Index/PSEi 30 has surged to consecutive all-time highs, reflecting massive outperformance since the BSP's historic banking sector rescue during the pandemic recession. (Figure 3, lowest pane) 

Conversely, the Property Index/PSEi 30, representing banks’ largest clients, has plunged to its lowest level since 2012. In other words, most of the selling pressure in the PSEi 30 has emanated from this sector.

Figure 4

The cumulative free float shares of the three largest banks have hit all-time highs as of February 28, suggesting that without intervention from the so-called “national team,” the PSEi 30 would have been substantially lower. (Figure 4, topmost image)

V. Symptoms of Capital Consumption: Despite Surging Credit Expansion, Falling Liquidity and Diminishing Returns

Despite back-to-back record highs in systemic leveraging—measured by the combined growth of universal commercial bank loans and public debt in pesos—the PSEi 30 continues to suffer from diminishing YoY returns. (Figure 4, middle image) 

This is also reflected in the banking system’s all-time low cash-to-deposits ratio, a key liquidity measure. (Figure 4, lowest window) 

The broader implication is clear: massive liquidity injections via credit expansion have led to capital consumption rather than productive investment. This is evident in the declining productivity rate of the economy and diminishing returns on stock market investments. 

It is also misleading to blame the PSE’s underperformance on local investors shifting to foreign assets such as offshore stocks or cryptocurrencies. While it may be true for some, the more pressing issue is the depletion of domestic savings.

VI. Share Buybacks as Panacea?

So, how does the establishment help resolve this predicament? While they might claim their shares are "undervalued"—indicating a perceived 'market failure'—Metro Pacific, for instance, opted to delist.

Figure 5

SM Investments made a similar claim while observing their diminishing clout, reflected by their declining share of the free float capitalization in the PSEi 30. 

In response, they recently launched a P60 billion share buyback program, "the largest ever announced by a Philippine corporation," aimed at purchasing an estimated 77 million shares, or 6% of the company's outstanding shares. 

Could this, however, signal a panic reaction? 

Some listed companies use their shares as collateral for loans or as currency in the context of mergers, often with price floors stipulated in their covenants. 

VII. The Path to Full-Fractional Reserve Banking and Deposit Insurance Expansion: A False Sense of Security? 

This fragility dilemma is further aggravated by the BSP’s recent reserve requirement ratio (RRR) cuts—and strikingly, the central bank is now proposing a transition to FULL fractional reserve banking, with plans to lower the RRR to ZERO. 

We previously discussed it here. 

The Philippines is NOT the U.S., which can afford zero RRR rates due to its deep and diversified capital markets. 

In contrast, systemic risks in the Philippines are being amplified as banks have increasingly monopolized the nation’s total financial resources, leaving the economy vulnerable to liquidity shocks and credit misallocation 

Meanwhile, the Philippine Deposit Insurance Corporation (PDIC) has doubled its maximum deposit insurance coverage. However, this comes at a time when the rate of qualified deposits continues to decline.

Figure 6 

As of Q3 2024: 

-Total insured deposits had been trending downward since 2011, reaching just 18.3% of total deposits. (Figure 6, upper chart) 

-Of this, only 9.83% were fully insured, while 8.4% were partially insured. 

Although this decline is attributed to aggressive bank credit expansion, which has inflated deposit levels, it has barely delivered a proportional increase in deposits. 

As an aside, it is unclear how much in assets the PDIC has to support such claims. 

VIII. In Summary: Intensifying Imbalances and Amplified Volatility; Opportunity? Mining Index 

The PSEi 30’s performance in 2025 reflects worsening structural imbalances, manifested through magnified volatility. 

To be sure, while fierce bear market rallies can occur, this does not mean that rising prices will eliminate these risks. 

Here’s what we’re watching: one key development has been gold’s record-breaking surge. 

If this trend continues, it could help provide a boost to the mining index, which has been quietly gaining upside momentum at the margins. (Figure 6, lowest pane) 

This represents a fringe (or niche) opportunity with potential. 

Nota bene: This article offers market insights but does not constitute a recommendation or call to action. 

BSP Reduces Banks' Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR), Fed's 50-bps Rate Cut Sends Philippine Yield Curve into Full Inversion!

 

The short end of the UST curve is highly influenced by the Federal Reserve’s monetary policies while the long end clarifies those policies through the prism of risk/return. A steep yield curve…is one that suggests a low rate, accommodative monetary policy that is likely to work over time. This accounts for the curve’s steepness. A flat and inverted curve is the opposite. Whatever monetary policy is being conducted, the long end is interpreting that policy as well as other conditions as being highly suspect—Jeffrey P Snider 

In this issue:

BSP Reduces Banks' Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR), Fed's 50-bps Rate Cut Sends Philippine Yield Curve into Full Inversion!

I. 2024 Reserve Requirement Ratio Cuts to Designed to Plug the Banking System’s Worsening Illiquidity

II. Bank Liquidity Drain from Held to Maturity (HTM) and Growing Non-Performing Loans (NPL)

III. Philippine Yield Curve Shifts from an Inverted Belly to a Full Inversion!

IV. Was San Miguel’s September 20th Pre-Closing Dump Related to the Liquidity Strained Yield-Curve Inversion? 

BSP Reduces Banks' Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR), Fed's 50-bps Rate Cut Sends Philippine Yield Curve into Full Inversion! 

The Philippine yield curve inverts as the BSP significantly reduces the Bank RRR, while the US Fed embarks on a "Not in Crisis" 50-bps rate cut. 

The BSP has been telegraphing cuts to the banking system’s Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR) since its last reduction in June 2023. 

For instance, Philstar.com, May 18, 2024: The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) is looking at a significant reduction in the level of deposits banks are required to keep with the central bank after it starts cutting interest rates this year, its top official said. BSP Governor Eli Remolona Jr. said the Monetary Board is planning to cut the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) of universal and commercial banks by 450 basis points to five percent from the existing 9.5 percent, the highest in the region. 

Four months later. 

GMANews.com, September 18, 2024: The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) is looking to cut the reserve requirement ratio, the amount of cash a bank must hold in its reserves against deposits, “substantially” this year and reduce it further in 2025. BSP Governor Eli Remolona Jr. said on Wednesday that the cut in the reserve requirement is being considered, with the timing being discussed. He earlier said this can be reduced to 5% from the present 9.5% for big banks. 

Two days after. 

ABSCBNNews.com, September 20, 2024: The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas is reducing the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) for universal and commercial banks by 250 basis points (bps).  This RRR reduction will also apply to non-bank financial institutions with quasi-banking functions, the BSP said… The reduction shall bring the RRRs of universal and commercial banks to 7 percent; digital banks to 4 percent; thrift banks to 1 percent; and rural and cooperative banks to zero percent, the central bank said. The new ratios take effect on October 25 and shall apply to the local currency deposits and deposit substitute liabilities of banks and NBQBs. (bold mine) 

I. 2024 Reserve Requirement Ratio Cuts to Designed to Plug the Banking System’s Worsening Illiquidity 

Bank lending growth has been accelerating, while broad economic liquidity measures have been rising, so why would the BSP opt to inject more liquidity through Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR) cuts? 

The following data set may provide some answers.

Figure 1

Although lending by Universal and Commercial Banks is at a record high in nominal peso terms, the growth rate remains far below pre-pandemic levels. (Figure 1, topmost image) 

The RRR cuts from 2018 to 2020 appeared to have worked, as the loans-to-deposit ratio rose to an all-time high in February 2020 but the pandemic-induced recession eroded these gains. (Figure 1, middle graph) 

It took a combination of historic BSP policies—record rate cuts, an unprecedented Php 2.3 trillion liquidity injection, and extraordinary relief measures—to reignite the loans-to-deposits ratio. Nonetheless, it still falls short of the 2020 highs. 

A likely, though unpublished, explanation is that bank liquidity continues to decline. 

As of July, the cash and due-to-bank deposits ratio was at its lowest level since at least 2013. The BSP policies of 2020 and subsequent RRR cuts bumped up this ratio from 2020-21, but it resumed its downtrend, which has recently worsened. (Figure 1, lowest chart)

Figure 2

After a brief recovery from the RRR cuts of 2018-2020—further aided by the BSP’s historic rescue measures in 2020—the liquid assets-to-deposits ratio has started to deteriorate again. (Figure 2, topmost pane) 

Additionally, Q2 2024 total bank profit growth has receded to its second-lowest level since Q2 2021. (Figure 2, middle diagram) 

From this perspective, liquidity boost from increased bank lending, RRR cuts, and reported profit growth has been inadequate to stem the cascading trend of cash and liquid assets. 

Furthermore, despite subsidies, relief measures, and a slowing CPI, Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) and distressed assets appear to have bottomed out in the current cycle. (Figure 3, lowest visual) 

Increasing NPLs in the face of a slowing CPI is indicative of demand. Refinancing has taken a greater role in the latest bank credit expansion. 

To wit, rising NPLs contribute significantly to the ongoing drain on the banking system’s liquidity. 

II. Bank Liquidity Drain from Held to Maturity (HTM) and Growing Non-Performing Loans (NPL)

Figure 3

A primary source of the downtrend in the cash-to-deposits ratio has been the banking system's Held-to-Maturity (HTM) securities. (Figure 3 upper image)

Once again, the BSP has acknowledged this. 

Banks face marked-to-market (MtM) losses from rising interest rates. Higher market rates affect trading since existing holders of tradable securities are taking MtM losses as a result. While some banks have resorted to reclassifying their available-for-sale (AFS) securities into held-to-maturity (HTM), some PHP845.8 billion in AFS (as of end-March 2018) are still subject to MtM losses. Furthermore, the shift to HTM would take away market liquidity since these securities could no longer be traded prior to their maturity. [BSP, 2018] (bold mine) 

Even though rates have dropped, HTM (Held-to-Maturity) assets remain at record levels but appear to be plateauing. Falling rates in 2019-2020 barely made a dent in the elevated HTM levels at the time. 

Yet, a principal source of HTMs continues to be the bank's net claims on central government (NCoCG). (Figure 3, lower graph) 

That is, banks continue to finance a substantial portion of the government's deficit spending, which has represented an elementary and major contributor to the deterioration in bank liquidity. 

Why has the BSP been doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results? Some call this "insanity." 

If the goal is to remove distortions—however ambiguously defined—why not eliminate the RRR entirely? 

It seems the BSP is merely buying time, hoping for a magical transformation of unproductive loans into productive lending. Besides, a complete phase-out of the RRR would leave the BSP with fewer "tools," or bluntly speaking, strip them of excuses. 

Thus, they’d rather have banks continue to accumulate unproductive loans in their portfolios and gradually subsidize them with relief from RRR cuts, rate cuts, various subsidies, and later direct injections—a palliative/band-aid treatment. 

III. Philippine Yield Curve Shifts from an Inverted Belly to a Full Inversion! 

Figure 4

Rather than steepening, the Fed's "not in a crisis" panic 50-basis-point cut also helped push the Philippine Treasury yield curve from an "inverted belly" to a "full inversion" on September 20! (Figure 4, tweet)

Figure 5

While yields across the entire curve plunged over the week, T-bill yields declined by a lesser degree relative to medium- and long-term Treasuries. (Figure 5, topmost window)

As a result, yields on Philippine notes and bonds have now fallen below T-bills!

Although one day doesn’t make a trend, this current inversion is the culmination of a process that began with a steep slope, then an inverted belly, and now a full inversion since June 2024. (Figure 5, middle chart)

The spreads between the 10-year bonds and their short-term counterparts are at the lowest level since March 2019! (Figure 5, lowest graph) 

And an inverted curve could serve as a warning signal/alarm bell for the economy.

From Investopedia: 

>An inverted yield curve forms when short-term debt instruments have higher yields than long-term instruments of the same credit risk profile.

>The inverted curve reflects bond investors’ expectations for a decline in longer-term interest rates, a view typically associated with recessions.

Further, it is a sign of tight liquidity: short-term borrowing costs rise or remain elevated, leading to higher yields on short-term debt instruments compared to long-term yields.

Moreover, expectations of slowing growth or economic recessions can also lead to decreased demand for riskier assets and increased demand for safer long-term bonds.

Again, the inverted curve must have resulted from the BSP’s announcement of a sharp reduction in the RRR in October, along with the Fed’s 50-basis point rate cuts.

Bottom line: cuts in the banks’ RRR were meant to address the banking system’s liquidity challenges as manifested in the Philippine treasury markets. The Fed’s 50-bps rate cut has exacerbated these distortions.

IV. Was San Miguel’s September 20th Pre-Closing Dump Related to the Liquidity Strained Yield-Curve Inversion?

Figure 6

Finally, it is interesting to observe that following the PSEi 30's intraday push above 7,300 last Friday, September 20, foreigners sold off or "dumped" SMC’s shares by 5% during the pre-closing five-minute float, contributing to the sharp decline in SMC’s share price and diminishing gains for the PSEi 30. (Figure 6, tweet) 

While we can’t directly attribute this to the inversion of the Philippine term structure of interest rates (yield curve), SMC’s intensifying liquidity challenges—evidenced by deteriorating cash reserves relative to soaring short-term debt in Q2 2024—should eventually influence its slope. (Figure 6, lower chart) 

In sum, as a "too big to fail" institution, SMC’s difficulties will inevitably reflect on the government’s fiscal and monetary health as well as the banks and the economy. 

____

references

FINANCIAL STABILITY COORDINATION COUNCIL, 2017 FINANCIAL STABILITY REPORT, p. 24 June 2018, bsp.gov.ph