Showing posts with label self-discipline. Show all posts
Showing posts with label self-discipline. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Macabre Tweet of the Day: Victim of China’s Stock Market Crisis

I had second thoughts about posting this macabre tweet from SCMP’s George Chen.


But it dawned on me that this image should underscore the wretched effects of bubbles.



The outrageous part has been that modern day governments (not limited to China) deliberately has fueled domestic bubbles in exploiting its gullible citizenry.

Bubbles have been part of the financial repression (zero bound, negative real rates and QE) policies or the invisible redistribution of wealth from the citizenry to the government and their private sector allies.

And eventually the hapless victims, pay the price for government’s predation.

Victims are not entirely blameless though. Had they developed self discipline through more financial education then this wouldn’t be a likely outcome.

Of course, I am not referring to the mainstream education which further exploits people’s vulnerability by focusing on silly historical numbers, from bogus math models and imagery patterns.

I allude to education that focuses on the identification of bubbles, its nature: formation, stages and aftereffects.

Mises-Hayek’s The Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT) principally captures the essence of this. Charles Kindleberger’s "Manias, Panics and Crashes", Peter Bernstein's "Against the Gods" and Harvard’s Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff’s “This time is Different” should be wonderful starting points.

Back to China’s developing crisis.


It’s not just interest rate cuts, the yuan was devalued again today

Additionally, the Chinese government has become so desperate to curtail the stock market crash that  they will “launch a three-month crackdown on unerground banking to curb money-laundering and illegal funds transfers as unstable markets stoke fears of capital flight.” according to  Reuters

In other words, capital flight has been accelerating to the point that the Chinese government can hardly contain her soft peg. So they had been forced to devalue almost daily.

As I have written two weeks back,
Also last week’s depreciation or devaluation could now be seen as a nasty side effect of China’s stock market rescue. Said differently, the Chinese government focused on saving the stock market either without knowledge of the malevolent consequences of credit expansion on the yuan, or that the government just took on the gambit to save face in the hope to reverse the underlying sentiment that has driven BOTH the stock market crash and capital flight.

This also means that for as long China’s bubbles deflates, the yuan will fundamentally weaken as capital will look for safehaven elsewhere, away from an imploding bubble economy.
Current events only has been validating my projection that “as each day passes China’s woes continues to deepen, where every step undertaken by the government to delay the day of reckoning only hastens its arrival.”

Oh by the way after a seesaw start, the Shanghai index fell by almost 4% according to Mr. Chen. But the SSE has now rebounded to offset the losses. The midday close shows the SSE up .8%

Like in the past, the rate cuts PLUS massive infusion of taxpayer money, capital controls and political repression have done little to shore up the imploding Chinese stock market and the economy.

Yet all the cumulative actions by the Chinese government have signified only signs of panic that things seem as getting out of hand.

Thursday, April 09, 2015

Chinese Tech Bubble Dwarfs US Dotcom Bubble as Manic Buying Spreads to Hong Kong and to Macau’s Casino Stocks!

In addition to my late March post of “price to whatever ratio” where I show how the current Chinese stock bubble seem as integral to the government’s political actions which has resulted to valuations being blown out of proportions, this Bloomberg article finds that valuations of Chinese technology stocks has now dwarfed the US dotcom bubble of 1997-2000. (bold mine)
The world-beating surge in Chinese technology stocks is making the heady days of the dot-com bubble look tame by comparison.

The industry is leading gains in China’s $6.9 trillion stock market, sending valuations to an average 220 times reported profits, the most expensive level among global peers. When the Nasdaq Composite Index peaked in March 2000, technology companies in the U.S. had a mean price-to-earnings ratio of 156.

Like the rise of the Internet two decades ago, China’s technology shares are being fueled by a compelling story: the ruling Communist Party is promoting the industry to wean Asia’s biggest economy from its reliance on heavy manufacturing and property development. In an echo of the late 1990s, Chinese stocks are also gaining support from lower interest rates, a boom in initial public offerings and an influx of money from novice investors. 

The good news is the technology sector makes up a smaller portion of China’s equity market than it did in the U.S. 15 years ago, limiting the potential fallout from a selloff. The bad news is that any reversal in the industry will saddle individual investors with losses and risk putting an end to the Shanghai Composite Index’s rally to a seven-year high.
Wow 220 PERs!!! Philippine index managers must be drooling for local stocks to attain such levels.

Well overvaluations don’t just happen. Rather they are consequences from prior actions, or in particular, such are symptoms of deeper problems. And one of the major problem stems from government policies. And this has duly been imputed by the article which cites “lower interest rates”, and consequently, government support to the technology sector. 

The article shows how government subsidies feeds into the current mania.
China’s government is boosting spending on science and technology as a faltering industrial sector drags down economic growth to the weakest pace in 25 years. In March, Premier Li Keqiang outlined an “Internet Plus” plan to link web companies with manufacturers. Authorities also plan to give foreign investors access to Shenzhen’s stock market, the hub for technology firms, through an exchange link with Hong Kong.

Among global technology companies with a market value of at least $1 billion, all 50 of the top performers this year are from China. The sector has the highest valuations among 10 industry groups on mainland exchanges after the CSI 300 Technology Index climbed 69 percent in 2015 through Tuesday, more than three times faster than the broader measure…

Technology companies have posted the biggest gains among Chinese IPOs during the past year, helped by a regulatory ceiling on valuations for new share sales. Beijing Tianli Mobile Service Integration Co. is the top performer among 147 offerings during the period after surging 1,871 percent from its offer price to trade at 379 times earnings… 

Valuations in China are now higher than those in the U.S. at the height of the dot-com bubble just about any way you slice them. The average Chinese technology stock has a price-to-earnings ratio 41 percent above that of U.S. peers in 2000, while the median valuation is twice as expensive and the market capitalization-weighted average is 12 percent higher, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
The idea that technology represents a small segment of the equity markets misappreciates the perspective that risks of imbalances have been a systemic issue.

Proof? From the same article
The use of margin debt to trade mainland shares has climbed to all-time highs, while investors are opening stock accounts at a record pace. More than two-thirds of new investors have never attended or graduated from high school, according to a survey by China’s Southwestern University of Finance and Economics.

Money has flowed into Chinese stocks in part because the central bank is cutting interest rates to support growth, something the U.S. Federal Reserve did in 1998 to revive confidence amid Russia’s sovereign debt default and the collapse of the hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management.
Symptoms of policy induced credit fueled asset (stock market) manias have been ubiquitous: margin trade are at all time highs combined with massive formal banking loans and shadow banking funds being funneled into stocks as retail punters enroll in record rates. Market participants then stampede into the price bidding hysteria or indulge in excessive speculation to pump up asset (stock market) prices to levels where valuations don’t seem to matter at all.

Yet systemic issues will have systemic ramifications.

To add icing to the cake, media portrays Chinese stock market irrationality on the increased participation from societal strata with lower educational background.

While education may somewhat help, the reality is that what demarcates between lemmings or people falling for the herding behavior trap and independent thinking is self-discipline which is a personal trait.

As I have pointed out numerous times here, throngs of well-educated or even high IQ people have been mesmerized by the illusions of prosperity from government sponsored bubbles or have even fallen victim to Ponzi schemes. As example, Queen Elizabeth chastised the economic industry for being blind to the 2008 crisis

Bubbles essentially pander to the emotions and egos rather than to logic. Thus self-discipline has mainly been about controlling emotions and egos (this is theoretically known as Emotional Intelligence) and hardly about education.

Anyway, to compound on the Chinese version of the modern day dotcom bubble has been an IPO bubble that includes small and medium scale enterprises

From Nikkei Asia (April 3; bold mine)
On Thursday, the China Securities Regulatory Commission approved an unprecedented 30 companies for listing on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges. It previously had maintained a moderate pace of initial public offerings to avoid upsetting market dynamics. But the frenzied run-up in stock prices seems to have eased oversupply concerns and encouraged the regulator to let loose.

Investors responded by lifting the Shanghai index to a seven-year high Friday. Bullishness is particularly apparent in the Shenzhen market. Seventeen of the 30 companies approved for IPOs will list on its ChiNext board for startups. The ChiNext index advanced 1.4% to a record 2,510. The average component is trading at nearly 100 times earnings.
ChiNext is a benchmark patterned after the NASDAQ listed at the Shenzhen Stock Exchange.

Wow average PERS at 100x!

Yet aside from monetary easing, price manipulation of IPOs have been used by the government to ramp up the public's interest in the stock market last year.

So even while another Chinese company, Cloud Live Technology group reportedly defaulted on her domestic debt last week, where the Chinese government via the PBOC injected 20 billion yuan ($3.28 billion dollars) most likely to ease pressures in response to such default, the stock market mania has been intensifying.


Chinese stocks used to be correlated with price actions of commodities (chart yardeni.com). Not anymore. Chinese stocks have mutated into mainly a central bank-Chinese government liquidity play with little relevance on the real economy. Such signifies another sign where the stock market fundamental functions of price discovery, and as discounting mechanism, has almost entirely broken down.

And Chinese stock market bubble has even percolated to Hong Kong. Hong Kong’s stocks as measured by the Hang Seng Index have virtually exploded to record highs!



Aside from the rationalized gap between mainland and Hong Kong stocks, fund flows via the Shanghai-Hong Kong connect, the Chinese government again has been attributed as a major influence. 

From the Wall Street Journal: Adding to investor confidence Thursday was an article in the state-run China Securities Journal headlined “Go! Buy Hong Kong Stocks!”, signaling to some analysts that the mainland government is encouraging the rally.

And to include today’s gains (+3.8% yesterday and +2.7% today), in two days, Hong Kong’s stocks has spiked by 6.5% and by over 10% since mid March!

The mania appears to be spreading.

Stocks of Macau’s casinos have also skyrocketed by about a stunning 10% in two days!

Aside from yesterday's dramatic twist of events, today MGM China Holdings (HK:2282) closed +5.44%, Galaxy Entertainment Group (HK:27) +5.56%, Melco Crown Entertainment (HK: 6883) +2.21%, Sands China Ltd. (HK: 1928) +5.92%, Wynn Macau Ltd. (HK: 1128) +8.69% (!!), and SJM Holdings Ltd. (HK:880) owner of Grand Lisboa, +5.13%.

Spectacular volatility!



Paradoxically, this has been happening even as Macau's gaming industry in March suffered another monumental collapse in terms of monthly gross and accumulated gross revenues!

It’s becoming clearer that the Chinese government appears to be bent on substituting or replacing a bursting property bubble with a stock market bubble. They seem to be buying time and anchoring on hope that new bubbles will not only offset the old ones but generate real growth.

Unfortunately, all bubbles end in tears.

Yet the above events represent added accounts of record stocks in the face of record imbalances at the precipice.

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Quote of the Day: Never confuse faith with the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality

On September 9th, 1965, US Navy pilot James Stockdale was shot down over North Vietnam and seized by a mob.

He would spend the next seven years in Hoa Lo Prison, the infamous “Hanoi Hilton”.

The physical brutality was unspeakable, and the mental torture never stopped. He would be kept in solitary confinement, in total darkness, for four years.

He would be kept in heavy leg-irons for two years and put on a starvation diet.

When told he would be paraded in front of foreign journalists, he slashed his own scalp with a razor and beat himself in the face with a wooden stool so that he would be unrecognizable and useless to the enemy’s press.

When he discovered that his fellow prisoners were being tortured to death, he slashed his wrists to show his torturers that he would not submit to them.

When his guards finally realized that he would die before cooperating, they relented.
 
The torture of American prisoners ended, and the treatment of all American prisoners of war improved.

Jim Collins, author of the influential study of US businesses, ‘Good to Great’, interviewed Stockdale during his research for the book. How had he found the courage to survive those long, dark years ?

“I never lost faith in the end of the story,” replied Stockdale.

“I never doubted not only that I would get out, but also that I would prevail in the end and turn the experience into the defining moment of my life, which in retrospect, I would not trade.”

Collins was silent for a few minutes. The two men walked along, Stockdale with a heavy limp, swinging a stiff leg that had never properly recovered from repeated torture.

Finally, Collins went on to ask another question. Who didn’t make it out ?

“Oh, that’s easy,” replied Stockdale. “The optimists.”

Collins was confused.

“The optimists. Oh, they were the ones who said, ‘We’re going to be out by Christmas.’

And Christmas would come, and Christmas would go. Then they’d say, ‘We’re going to be out by Easter.’

And Easter would come, and Easter would go. And then Thanksgiving. And then it would be Christmas again. And they died of a broken heart.”

As the two men walked slowly onward, Stockdale turned to Collins.

“This is a very important lesson. You must never confuse faith that you will prevail in the end – which you can never afford to lose – with the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they might be.”
This discipline versus faith narrative, which is very relevant to the current risk environment, is from Tim Price at the Sovereign Man

Saturday, December 21, 2013

Robert Ringer: The Curse of the Lottery

Free lunch has always been a seduction. Yet people hardly realize that there are always consequences to every action. This includes free lunch. Take for instance, in winning the lottery, the public sees only the 'winning' side, while ignoring the costs from such events.

The prolific self development author Robert Ringer explains
Here we go again, another centimillionaire via the Mega Millions lottery — $173.8 million after taxes.  The winner was fifty-six-year-old Ira Curry, who bought her ticket at an Atlanta newsstand.  A second winner, who bought his/her ticket at a gift shop in San Jose, California, had not yet come forward as of the time this article was being written.

Let’s hope that Ms. Curry doesn’t follow in the footsteps of the vast majority of past mega-lottery winners, whose lives became totally unraveled as a result of their newfound wealth.  In this regard, perhaps West Virginian Jack Whittaker is the poster man for past lottery winners.

Back in 2002, Whittaker was the winner of $315 million in the Powerball multi-state lottery.  Since he opted to take a one-time payout, Whittaker actually received “only” a little over $113 million after taxes.

The first reality of sudden wealth that Whittaker was confronted with was an endless parade of people with requests for money.  Some folks didn’t even bother to ask for a handout in person.  They just sent letters — fifty thousand of them! — telling him they needed some of his green stuff as soon as possible.

Whittaker forked over about $50 million before he came to his senses.  But when he backed away from his role as year-round Santa Claus, the mooches became angry.  A number of them even threatened him.

When their threats failed, many of the good folks in West Virginia started suing Deep Pockets Whittaker for a variety of alleged torts.  In fact, he’s counted about four hundred legal claims against him since he won the lottery.

Confused and intensely unhappy, Whittaker began carousing, drinking, and propositioning young gals in strip clubs.  His wife of forty-four years threw him out and, after giving away millions, he found himself with no friends.

But there was one glowing light in his life — his beloved granddaughter, seventeen-year-old Brandi.  Whittaker gave her four new cars and an allowance of $2,000 a week.  It was a real-life Beverly Hillbillies saga, only played out in West Virginia instead of California.

As one might have predicated, having that kind of cash in her pocket led Whittaker’s granddaughter to drugs.  Soon after that, her boyfriend, Jesse Tribble, died of a drug overdose in Whittaker’s home in September 2003.  Then, a little over a year later, Brandi, too, was found dead of an overdose.

Since then, things have only gotten worse for Whittaker.  Stating the obvious in a tearful 20/20interview, he said, “Money is not what makes people happy.”  Of course, every half-sober, mature adult already knows that.  But it’s important to understand that money also doesn’t automatically saddle a wealthy person with unhappiness.

As popular as the aphorism may be, money is not “the root of all evil.”  And, in fact, that’s not what the source of those words — the New Testament (Timothy, 6:10) — actually says.  Rather, it states, “For the love of money is the root of all evil.”  (My emphasis.)

This has not just been an isolated case, here is a list of 19 lottery winners who blew their winnings; some of them endured wrecked lives. 

This just shows how free lunches distort on people’s incentives by magnifying on the winner’s short term priorities or the quest for short term or instant gratification. Such collapse in self-discipline results to money taking over their lives. As a result, such windfalls in many occasions have led to adverse outcomes.

And to think of it, in many countries governments endorse or even operate lotteries

Monday, December 31, 2012

Quote of the Day: The Illusions of Pundits

People who spend their time, earn their living, studying a particular topic produce poorer predictions than dart-throwing monkeys who would have distributed their choices evenly over the options. Even in the region they knew best, experts were not significantly better than non-specialists.

Those who know more forecast very slightly better than those who know less. But those with the most knowledge are often less reliable. The reason is that the person who acquires more knowledge develops an enhanced illusion of her skill and becomes unrealistically overconfident. “We reach the point of diminishing marginal predictive returns for knowledge disconcertingly quick,” Tetlock writes. (Philip E. Tetlock, University of Pennsylvania in 2005 book Expert Political Judgment: How Good is It? How Can We Know?—Prudent Investor) “In this age of academic hyperspecialization, there is no reason for supposing that contributors to top journals—distinguished political scientists, area study specialists, economists, and so on—are better than journalists or attentive readers of the The New York Times in ‘reading’ emerging situations”. The more famous of the forecaster, Tetlock discovered, the more flamboyant the forecasts. “Experts in demand,” he writes, “were more confident than their colleagues who eked out existences far from the limelight.”
The above quote is from 2002 Nobel laureate psychologist and professor Daniel Kahneman in his insightful book Thinking, Fast and Slow p.219

There are many reasons not to trust pundits, aside from overconfidence, which essentially oversimplifies human action.

I believe that the substantial chunk of “expert errors” emerge from the influences of conflict-of-interest relations, particularly the principal-agent problem, where “experts” tend to promote the interests of employers, sponsors, donors, grant providers and or even political agents (perhaps through implicit ambition to be part of the political institution) whom are sources of the self-interests of such pundits.

Forecasting inaccuracies may also be linked to the rigid application of ideology and or on the overreliance on math models (scientism).

Add to this the desperate desire by “experts” to attain social acceptance via social signaling.  Such would include making extreme (media attracting) projections or providing the veneer of expertise on what truly is about populism—forecasting based on what is popular, or as I previously wrote 
For many, thus, expertise signify more as social signaling (posturing or seeking social acceptance) and or “telling people what they want to hear” but predicated on certain technically based paradigms which produces an aura of supposed superiority rather than representative of the true domain knowledge.
Dr. Kahneman suggests that to determine “true expertise” from merely displays of the “illusions of validity”, one should identify conditions where pundits have excelled in “an environment that is sufficiently regular to be predictable” and from their having “to learn these regularities through prolonged practice” (p 240). In short, in an unpredictable world, expert opinion should be less trusted.

However by simply associating expertise with “regularity” and “prolonged practice” seems to contradict logically his earlier critique of pattern seeking behavior (which is about the human psychological propensity to seek regularity or constancy through patterns while at the same time underestimating the role of randomness). The nuance will be on the marginal efforts applied by practitioners via  “prolonged practice” in dealing with such regularities. 

The point is despite being able to minimize the influences of “expert or non-expert” intuition on decision making that may result to lesser degree of judgmental errors, behavioral economics/finance will not lead to omniscience or come close to solving the knowledge problem: a complex society will always be subject to irregularities and unpredictability from the dynamic and intricate feedback mechanism of human action and of environmental changes. Dr. Kahneman acknowledges this: "Errors of prediction are inevitable, because the world is unpredictable" (p. 220)

Nevertheless the best way to acquire “expertise” is primarily through investing in oneself

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Negative Real Rates Breed Ponzi Schemes

I have been saying here that negative real rates will not only drive people to gamble but to fall prey to Ponzi scams

I wrote last March:
Since fixed incomes will also suffer from interest rate manipulations, many will fall victim or get seduced to dabble with Ponzi schemes marketed by scoundrels who would use the current policy induced environment as an opportunity to exploit a gullible public.

In the US, Ponzi schemes skyrocketed as the US Federal Reserve has taken on a zero bound interest rate environment in response to the recent crisis in 2008.
I wrote last week
instead of locking money through interest rate dividends from savings account in the financial institutions, zero bound regime or negative real rates which are part of financial repression have been forcing people to chase on yields and gamble in order to generate returns. So the public have become more of a “risk taker” and take on “greedy” activities in response to such policies. Some would even fall or become victims to Ponzi schemes which I expect to mushroom. 
Today’s headlines seem to validate my predictions:

From the Inquirer.net
A company managed by a former janitor and driver, and founded just early this year, has duped at least 15,000 people in Mindanao and the Visayas of P12 billion in a pyramid scam, an official of the National Bureau of Investigation said Tuesday.

The NBI identified the company as Aman Futures Group Phils. Inc.

“Some of the victims committed suicide and others have become violent and sick when they learned their hard-earned money was gone,” said Virgilio Mendez, NBI deputy director for regional operations services, who was investigating the scam.

Among Aman Futures’ victims were local politicians, police and military personnel, government workers, market vendors, farmers, drivers, retired employees and overseas Filipino workers, according to Mendez.

He said the number of “complainants from across the country is piling up.”
Aside from negative real rates, because of the overdependence on the government to do the legwork of supervision on the viability of such devious projects, the victim’s economic calculation has been substituted for the desire “to gain something from nothing

More from the same article
He said Aman Futures was able to lure investors by offering a 30-percent to 40-percent return on investment within eight days, and a 50-percent to 80-percent profit for 18 to 20 days.

“The amount of interest varies depending on the investment or money placements,” Mendez said.
And worst Ponzi schemes have been endorsed by politicians
He said the victims trusted Aman Futures largely because of endorsements from local officials.

“They trusted Aman Futures because even local government officials had openly endorsed it and admitted to have invested also,” Mendez explained.
This shows how people have been duped in the same way as they see politics (via elections and legislation): they simply look at the superficialities (here in terms returns) without ever questioning the system (or in this case how such returns will be funded and what types of projects will lead to such astronomical returns).

Critical thinking, and most importantly, self responsibility has eschewed for endorsements and assurances from politicians, who ironically became victims themselves.  This is the welfare mentality.

Of course, under a negative real rates regime, there will be more instances of Ponzi, pyramiding and other fraudulent schemes which will snooker many. 

Again the morality of the policies inflationism from the great Henry Hazlitt (bold mine)
Inflation, to sum up, is the increase in the volume of money and bank credit in relation to the volume of goods. It is harmful because it depreciates the value of the monetary unit, raises everybody's cost of living, imposes what is in effect a tax on the poorest (without exemptions) at as high a rate as the tax on the richest, wipes out the value of past savings, discourages future savings, redistributes wealth and income wantonly, encourages and rewards speculation and gambling at the expense of thrift and work, undermines confidence in the justice of a free enterprise system, and corrupts public and private morals.
The above example is a validation of how negative real rates and the lack of self-responsibility due to overdependence on government debauches the morality of the public and private sector.

Monday, October 22, 2012

Will Frothy Bond Markets Drive the Phisix Higher?

clip_image001[4]

The Philippine equity benchmark, the Phisix seems to be knocking on the gateway of another milestone high, as I noted two weeks back[1],
One must be reminded that bubbles come in stages. So far the Philippines seem to be at a benign phase of the bubble cycle.

Again bubbles will principally be manifested on capital intensive sectors (like real estate, mining, manufacturing) and possibly, but not necessarily, through the stock markets.

This means that for as long as the US does not fall into a recession or a crisis, ASEAN outperformance, fueled by a banking credit boom and foreign fund flows operating on a carry trade dynamic or interest rate and currency arbitrages (capital flight I might add), should be expected to continue.

And again I will maintain that ASEAN’s record breaking streak may be sustained at least until the end of the year 2012.

Friday’s substantial decline in the US stock markets may put a start-of-the-week dampener on the current momentum. However this seems unlikely a hurdle to the Bernanke-Draghi inspired Christmas or year-end rally particularly for the record setting ASEAN bourses as shown above [Philippine Phisix PCOMP orange, Indonesia JCI green, Thailand SET yellow, Malaysia FMKLCI red].

Emerging Market Bonds Outperform Equities

The price actions of the bonds of emerging market should give us a clue.

clip_image002[4]

The zooming pace of the JP Morgan USD Emerging Market Bond Fund (EMB) appears to be accelerating.

In the bond fund, the Philippines and Indonesia have been among the major components of with 6.81% and 6.56% share of the pie in the total portfolio[2]. This implies that the ASEAN bond markets have been outperforming their respective equity peers.

A further clue can be seen in what appears as emerging bond markets (EMB) eclipsing the gains of emerging equity (EEM)[3] counterparts.

As caveat, the country based distribution of weightings of the bond and equity indices have been different. This means that we can’t entirely depend on its accuracy when making a comparison.

clip_image004[4]

Nevertheless, for local bond currency market, the huge jump in the share distribution of the real estate (18% in June vis-à-vis 13% December 2011) and infrastructure-based industries (from insignificant to 6%) gives further evidence of the business cycle in progress.

As per the largest issuers by sector, banks and financials remain the largest but have lost 3% of the share of the pie. This is followed by the rapidly growing real estate sector and holding companies.

clip_image005[4]

And for the share of the ownership of investors by type, based on % of local currency denominated government bonds issued, banks and financial institutions have been the largest, albeit on a steady marginal decline in terms of trend over the past 7 years.

Other major investors, according to the Asian Development Bond includes[4]

1) BTr-managed funds which account for Bond Sinking Fund (BSF) Securities Stabilization Fund (SSF), and the Special Guaranty Fund (SGF),

2) contractual savings and tax-exempt institutions (TEIs) which represent government pension and insurance funds (e.g., Government Service Insurance System [GSIS], Social Security System [SSS], and Philippine Health Insurance Corp. [PHIC]), private insurance companies, and tax exempt funds and corporations

3) custodians which are BSP-accredited securities custodians for investor-clients and lastly

4) other government entities such as government-owned and -controlled corporations (GOCCs), and various corporate and individual investors.

The apparent boom in emerging market bond markets may have been partly reflected on the sectoral returns in the equity markets.

clip_image007[4]

The financial sector, property and holding companies—which have been heavy on both—have returned a whopping 42.54%, 40.95% and 33.32% respectively; on a year-to-date basis (see light maroon bars).

Except for the service sector, the nearly broad based weekly gains (dark maroon bars) for the rest of industry compounded on the outsized year-to-date returns (see light maroon bars).

Bonds are Less Risky or a Bubble?

clip_image008

The positive flows into the bond markets have not been limited to Asia, this has apparently been true even in the US, where fund flows have mostly been concentrated on fixed income related investments such as ETFs and “hybrid” balance funds with income orientation as retail investor flee equity markets[5].

Yet the idea that bonds are relatively “less risky” represents charade bestowed upon by global central bank’s tsunami of monetary inflation and financial and banking regulations that have biased towards incentivizing financial and bank institutions to hold bonds[6].

For instance, Japan’s central bank, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) recently warned the banking and financial industry of their high sensitivity to interest rate risks; where for every 1% increase of interest rates, large banks and regional banks could suffer losses of ¥ 3.7 trillion and ¥3.0 trillion respectively[7]

clip_image009

But the supreme irony has been that the BoJ themselves have been responsible for putting at risks the domestic banking system through their pronounced policy of supposedly fighting deflation through inflationism via asset purchases. The BoJ’s balance sheet[8] now accounts for about 30% of the IMF’s estimated economic growth rate.

Reports also suggest that the BoJ may even add to their monetary easing efforts[9] on October 30th

clip_image010
Noticeably Japan’s outward investment flows, which are at near record levels[10], have supplanted China, despite the streak of failures where the batting average of outward FDIs have been unfavorable and the losses have been substantial.

About 26 trillion yen ($330 billion) have accounted for the lost market value from the 10 biggest overseas purchases by Japanese companies from 2000 to a year ago. Apparently the batting success average of Japan’s outward Foreign Direct Investments has been 1: 5 or 20%, where two posted gains while eight companies suffered losses during the said period.

And of the two winners, one is from Kirin Holdings whose acquisition of 48% of San Miguel Brewery [PSE:SMB] in 2009 has tripled in value[11].

I have been pointing out here that beyond the mainstream’s false notion of Japan’s deflation bogeyman, monetary policies, policy or regulatory (regime) uncertainties, interest rate risks and credit risks have all compounded to haunt Japan’s increasingly crony based political economy, prompting resident investors to take larger and unnecessary risks abroad for either survival or to seek out higher returns[12].

clip_image012

Going back to the fund flows in the US, ironically, despite the sustained outflows in the equity markets and last Friday’s slump, the US major bellwether the S&P 500 ended the week marginally on the positive note (dark violet bars).

Yet major global equity markets, led by the S&P 500, have mostly been significantly up on a year-to-date basis (light violet bars).

This fantastic but unsustainable run in the bond markets, which has exhibited symptoms of bubble dynamics, will unlikely persist.

We can either expect a shift out of bonds and into the stock markets or that the bond markets could be the trigger to the coming crisis.

In my view, the former is likely to happen first perhaps before the latter. To also add that triggers to crisis could come from exogenous forces.

Central Bank Actions Rule the Day

So far, steroids from central banks aimed at supporting the asset markets will continue to distort market price signals. And this time I am not alone saying this.

This recent commentary from Financial Times[13] seems highly relevant to the current state of affairs (bold emphasis mine)

Much of the blame for this tends to be attributed to the fact that markets now move to a drumbeat of statements from politicians and central bankers, such as the head of the US Federal Reserve. “All 500 S&P companies have the same chairman and his name is Ben Bernanke,” says Jurrien Timmer of the Fidelity Global Strategies Fund.

It is also true that securities within markets, as well as far-flung debt and equity markets have been trading more “in sync” with each other: the willingness of investors to take on risk being a common factor behind price moves.
The conditions of a parallel universe—where markets have become seemingly detached to economic reality—which I have been pounding on the table since, has even been recognized by the chief executive Mohamed El-Erian of PIMCO one of the largest fixed income firms.

At the Financial Times Mr. El-Erian writes[14] (bold mine)
Essentially, the Fed is inserting a sizeable policy wedge between market values and underlying fundamentals. And investors in virtually every market segment – including bonds, commodities, equities, foreign exchange and volatility – have benefited handsomely. In the process, many asset prices have been taken close to what would normally be regarded as bubble territory, with some already there. 

Central bank action, both real and perceived, rules the investment day, and will continue to do so for now. This is also the case in Europe.
And if central bank actions have truly become the rule for the investment world, then to what degree of relevance does traditional or conventional knowledge apply on pricing and valuing stock markets in the current setting?

Another commentary from the Lex Column of the Financial Times nails it[15],
Perhaps the most horrifying thing about the current combination of sales deceleration, margin contraction and high valuations is that it might not even be a sell signal.  The central banks of the US and Europe may well keep investors trapped in risky assets indefinitely. Those who look at the fundamentals and flee to cash had better be patient.
In reality market participants are being sucked into the vortex of speculative mania, which means another round of intensive build-up of misallocated resources or malinvestments and a future bust. We are in a boom phase of a bubble cycle.

FED policies have begun to diffuse into the US property markets which have shown significant broad based recovery[16]: particularly in existing home sales, housing starts, new home sales, building permits, builder confidence, to even a decline in shadow inventories, and signs of the inflection point of real estate loans at ALL commercial banks.

The assumption that FED policies have been successful would signify as presumptive or short sightedness or even blind belief of the capabilities of bureaucrats.

People forget that costs are not benefits. What seems as a boom today will ultimately end in tears. And bubbles, which have been growing in scale and frequency, once pricked will lead to massive capital destruction that would take years to recover especially when interventions delay them and or even make them worse.

General destruction of wealth and wealth generating activities can never be a benefit even from the Pareto optimal perspective. 

clip_image013

The recovering US real estate industry is being buttressed by the improving state of credit as seen by the annual % change in consumer loans and commercial industrial loans at ALL commercial banks. (Source St. Louis Fed)

Yet once the colossal excess reserves by depositary institutions held at the US Federal Reserve flows into the system, the US and the rest of the world will be faced with the risks of price inflation.

And price inflation or the market’s recognition of the unsustainability of the fiscal positions of US will likely serve as the proverbial the pin that would perforate and end the inflating bubble.

For now, the US asset bubble will likely be sustained.

Miniature Stock Bubble: Alcorn Petroleum

At the local markets, as pointed out last week, inflationary booms titillates the gambling ticks and speculative adrenalin of many participants. Punters and tyros will be seduced to the allure of easy money based on dramatic price surges, and eventually, fall prey to gruesome price collapses.

And the imprudent and those bearing the entitlement mentality will pass the blame on ‘manipulation’ or ‘fraud’ to the markets and call for regulations without accounting for the incentives brought about by bubble policies on people’s behavior.

Let me quote anew the great libertarian economist, journalist Henry Hazlitt[17]
Inflation, to sum up, is the increase in the volume of money and bank credit in relation to the volume of goods. It is harmful because it depreciates the value of the monetary unit, raises everybody's cost of living, imposes what is in effect a tax on the poorest (without exemptions) at as high a rate as the tax on the richest, wipes out the value of past savings, discourages future savings, redistributes wealth and income wantonly, encourages and rewards speculation and gambling at the expense of thrift and work, undermines confidence in the justice of a free enterprise system, and corrupts public and private morals.
More regulations will not solve the behavioral imbalances caused and rewarded by antecedent immoral policies.

clip_image015
Over the past two weeks Alcorn Petroleum [PSE: APM] has skyrocketed to close on Friday by an eye-popping 600+%!

The company officially disclosed that they “cannot confirm” the rumored backdoor listing by allegedly the other “retailing” businesses owned by the same of owners, although the firm “appointed a financial adviser” to submit recommendations[18]. If the rumor involved different parties then such denial would seem sensible as negotiations involve the risks of transaction failure. But in this case, the parties supposedly are the same owners.

The company also referred the excessive price fluctuations or movements to a possible “oil exploration play”. Alcorn Petroleum has a 9.32% participating interests at the Service Contract 51- covering the East Visayas Basin.

Yet since the other partners in the same service contract[19] have had mixed performance this week, particularly, Trans Asia (+5.79%) [PSE: TA] and PetroEnergy [PSE: PERC] (-.84%) one can hardly impute an oil exploration play to the astronomical price surge of APM.

Whatever the reasons behind the price spike, prudence dictates that such huge series of price surges characterizes bubble dynamics which overtime typically ends up with huge frustrations for those left holding the proverbial bag.
clip_image017

Property giant Century Property Group [PSE: CPG], which got listed through the backdoor from the buyout of East Asia Power Resources in August[20] of last year, had seen a similar stratospheric surge as many jumped in on the rumored backdoor play.

However when the rumor became fact, CPG retrenched most of its accrued bottom-to-peak gains. As of Friday, CPG’s prices have been down about 62% from its zenith closing price.

Today’s bullmarket, and partly CPG’s financial heft, have essentially provided support to her current price levels. 

clip_image019

CPG’s tale is unlike the sordid experience of another stock bubble in 2000, which again involved another backdoor listing play, particularly Philweb [PSE: WEB] through formerly listed South Seas Oil[21]. Not to mention the BW Resources scandal in 1999.

In the backdrop of a bear market and upon the realization of the deal, WEB virtually gave back all its 1,000++% gains or returned whence it came from. And many punters who took part in the play had about a decade or more to recoup part of their losses (that’s for those who can’t accept their mistakes).

WEB’s experience seems to parallel the Thailand episode during the Asian Crisis as previously discussed[22]. Bubbles take time to heal whether seen from a macro or micro level.

The bottom line is to apply the Duck Test[23] for suspected stock bubbles: if it walks like duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, it must be a duck.
These are the issues to avoid and to ignore.

This wisdom quote from author C Joybell C should apply to stock picking as well
Choose your battles wisely. After all, life isn't measured by how many times you stood up to fight. It's not winning battles that makes you happy, but it's how many times you turned away and chose to look into a better direction. Life is too short to spend it on warring. Fight only the most, most, most important ones, let the rest go.
Today’s bullmarket should come with a lot of opportunities without having to expose oneself to enormous risk. And all it takes is emotional intelligence[24] and self-discipline[25]





[3] iShares.com MSCI Emerging Markets Index Fund us.iShares.com

[4] ADB, Asia Bond Monitor, Asianbondsonline.org September 2012

[7] Wall Street Journal Japanese Banks Face Huge Rate Rise Risk, Warns BOJ, October 19, 2012

[8] Pedro Da Costa Central bank balance sheets: Battle of the bulge Reuters Blog April 12, 2012

[9] Asahi Shimbun BOJ mulls further monetary easing, October 18, 2012

[13] Dan McCrum End to ‘alpha’ spells trouble for fund managers Financial Times September 10, 2012

[14] Mohamed El Erian Beware the ‘central bank put’ bubble Financial Times, October 10, 2012

[17] Henry Hazlitt What You Should Know About Inflation p.18 Mises.org

[18] Alcorn Petroleum Re: Comment on Inquirer.net News Article PSE.com.ph October 16, 2012

[19] Business Inquirer.net Drillers settle dispute on farm-in deal August 10, 2012

[23] Wikipedia.org Duck test