The Significance of the Phisix 3,400

``Investing should be dull. It shouldn't be exciting. Investing should be more like watching paint dry or grass grow. If you want excitement, take $800 and go to Las Vegas.”- Nobel Economist Paul Samuelson

WHEN 3,400 was mentioned as a benchmark, the significance for this is the “concept of round numbers” as propounded by the legendary trader Jesse Livermore (Reminiscences of a Stock Operator), where he says that a round number crossed for the “first time” should likely keep the momentum going further.

In technical lingo, the Phisix has drifted above the 3,400 level from January 31^st to February 5^th in 1997 whereby its watershed level was reached at 3,447.6 on Feb 3, 1997. The other “high” was in January 4^th of 1994 at 3,308.37.

Figure 4: A Breakout of 3,400 Validates the Path to 10,000?

This means to say that it is NOT the first time for the Phisix to reach the 3,400 level. But should it reattempt to do so, it implies that a sustained breach of such threshold level SHOULD SPUR the Phisix to a much significantly higher level.

And MOST IMPORTANTLY, a sustained breakout connotes of the validity of the underlying PRIMARY STAGE of the Phisix bullmarket (nominally based and not inflation adjusted) which I think buttresses our assumption that the Phisix will conservatively reach 10,000 over the present cycle (barring a global depression) see figure 4.

In addition, in a WORLD OF DIMINISHING RETURNS, a Phisix at 3,400 relative to Friday’s close translates to 5.67% return, so absolute threshold levels basically sets your portfolio returns.

Zimbabwe: An Example of Global Inflationary Bias?

``The financial press sometimes criticizes Federal Reserve policy, but the validity of the fiat system itself is never challenged. Both political parties want the Fed to print more money, either to support social spending or military adventurism. Politicians want the printing presses to run faster and create more credit, so that the economy will be healed like magic- or so they believe.”-Congressman Ron Paul of Texas, The Federal Reserve Monopoly over Money

WE have always argued that markets remain irrational (especially over the short-term) more than we can remain solvent. Because I’ve lately quoted Keynes a lot (based on momentum and NOT on Demand management through government intervention), I have been misconstrued to have turned into a Keynesian cheerleader. No, momentum does not equate to cheerleading nor does it signify my tergiversation from our free market principles to the Keynesian philosophical dogma.

Despite the present developments, risks have not abated and in fact as the IMF pointed out in its recent Global Financial Stability Report, they have been enhanced, the Reuters quotes the IMF, ``Global economic conditions have been supportive of a benign financial environment, but underlying risks and conditions have shifted somewhat since ... September 2006, and have the potential to weaken financial stability.”

Yet, we have been ingrained to think or made to believe by textbooks or by mainstream analysts or by the media that stock market performances are reflective of the performances of corporations or of a nation’s GDP growth. Or simply, a country’s economic progression defines its relative returns with regards to stock market investing or is it?

Figure 5: Mises.org: Zimbabwe: Best Performing Stock Market in 2007?

According to John Paul Koning, the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange is shaping out to be the best performing stock index in the world up about 595% year to date, and get this, a whopping 12,000% (TWELVE THOUSAND PERCENT) in over 12 months see figure 5!

Yet, Zimbabwe’s economy has rapidly deteriorated over the years due to policies adopted by its tyrant ruler Pres. Robert Mugabe. The Economist Intelligence Unit shows Zimbabwe’s GDP calculated in Billions of US dollars based on Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) at $25.04 billion in 2002 to $21.13 billion in 2006 or a nominal decline of over 15% over the past 5 years!

The reason Zimbabwe’s stock market has been zooming is due to its hyperinflationary state (Germany’s Weimar 1920s experience relived!). Its degenerative economy and its lack of access to financing have led its incumbent government to undertake excessive money printing in order to preserve its powers.

And excessive production of money has reduced its purchasing power of its currency so great that consumer price index have jumped by an astonishing 1,729% a year! Imagine losing the value of your currency by the day!

Now of course, the lack of opportunities under such hyperinflationary landscape has alternatively made its stock market as the ONLY safehaven from the evaporating value of the country’s currency.

John Paul Koning elaborates (emphasis mine)

``According to Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT), the peak-trough-peak pattern that economies demonstrate is not their natural state, but one created by excess growth in money supply and credit. New money is not simply parachuted to everyone equally and at the same time — it is sluiced into the economy at certain initial “entry points”....

``If, as the Austrian theory states, money enters the economy at certain points, it is likely that a nation's stock market will become a prime beneficiary of any monetary expansion. Fresh money enters the economy first through banks and other financial entities who may invest it in shares, or lend it to others who buy shares. Thus stock prices rise relative to prices of things like food and clothes and will outperform as long as this monetary process is allowed to continue.”

``As prices become more misaligned, basic decision-making abilities of normal Zimbabweans are impaired and the day-to-day functioning of the economy deteriorates. Perversely, all of this has forced the government to issue even more currency to make up for budget shortfalls and to buy support. At last measure, the country's consumer price index was rising (i.e., the purchasing power of currency declining), at a rate of 1,729% a year.”

In other words, contrary to the public’s expectations, monetary process contributes to the conditions of the financial markets and not just changes in GDP.

And it is in this regards where we have frequently commented that the appearance of peculiarities (rampaging asset prices amidst deteriorating fundamentals) in the behavior of the global financial markets may actually reflect such inflationary tendencies...but on a benign scale relative to the Zimbabwe’s experience.

Possible symptoms as price misalignments or distortions, rich valuations, record low yields, low volatilities, record low credit spreads, expanding global imbalances and rampant signs of speculation (private equity, mergers and acquisition and exploding hedge funds) on a backdrop of gradually rising consumer prices indices can be viewed as affectations of such monetary processes to the financial markets in contrast to other preconceived theories as the Global Savings Glut, Lack of Investment or dearth of supply of investible instruments.

So when we declare that momentum favors today asset classes, or otherwise seen as “cheerleading”, our premise originates from the perspective where surging money and credit expansion or simply inflationary manifestations have been MADE conducive for the financial sphere to expand its tentacles behind and in support of today’s structurally asset dependent economies.

In the prescient words of Hyman Minsky, ``An understanding of the American economy requires an understanding of how the financial structure is affected by and affects the behavior of the economy over time. The time path of the economy depends upon the financial structure.”

I guess this should apply not just to the American economy but to the global economy as well.

Flash Outlook: Momentum Favors a Phisix Breakout of 3,400!

Happy Easter!

Let me first tell you that as a matter of priorities my concern hinges on a longer term deposition, it is seldom on my part take on short term forecasting.

However, recent developments over the past week have compelled me to issue this outlook.

Figure 1: US Dollar, Gold and Emerging Markets

As the US dollar (trade weighted index) manifests renewed signs of weakening, Gold and emerging markets have lately been showing signs of rejuvenation.

In fact, as shown in Figure 1, emerging market bourses represented by the iShare Emerging Market indices (red candle) have broken into new heights (lower panel) while gold (black line behind) has seen some resurgence and appears to be on its way to test its resistance level at around the 690-695 area.

What these confluences appear to tell us is that the softening US dollar could be providing for the backstop of liquidity in the global financial markets.

Figure 2: US Global Investors/SGS: Commodity prices recover

Where the performances of emerging market assets have shown strong correlation to commodities, Figure 2 shows of how copper prices, steel and the Baltic freight price Index have recently chimed in to exhibit renewed vigor.

These markets appear to contradict expectations of a global economic slowdown or could they imply “decoupling”? Or is it telling us of another message relative to the purchasing power of the US dollar?

Figure 3: Carry Trade Currencies

Our concern of late has been of the liquidity provided for by the carry trade arbitrage, where the recent spike in the low yielding “funding” currencies has served to curtail “liquidity” in the marketplace which prompted for the recent bout of interrelated market corrections.

Today, the current swoon in the both the Swiss Franc and the Japanese Yen on the backdrop of rallying global assets worldwide suggests to us that the speculative ramp has been set for a possible continuity of in favor of asset upside repricing.

Figure 4: Phisix Peso correlation: Peso Nears breakout, will the Phisix follow suit?

As we have noted in the past, the Peso/USD and the Phisix has shown strong correlations, whereby inflection points have been coincidental (declining Phisix- strengthening USD and vice versa).

At Friday’s close, we see the Peso end at its resistance level relative to the US Dollar as shown in Figure 4. Could we be seeing a breakout of the Peso which should similarly reflect on the Phisix?

At the start of the year, I had neutral to bearish with the Peso and the Phisix considering the market’s cyclicality. I had been expecting a decline at around 2,600-2,800 as a global slowdown unfolds with risks from the US diffusing to the world. That slowdown and cyclical correction appears to have been factored in, in contrast to my expectations, while global markets have taken the next step further.

Yes we are aware that the risks from the US credit markets may yet spread and or liquidity concerns from other aspects as the Carry trend phenomenon or geopolitics may work to forestall the recent advances, however, at the moment, momentum appears to have shifted greatly in favor of the bulls.

So in my view, IF the peso closes below the 48 level, one should expect the PHISIX to bolt out of the 3,400 level SOON.

When asked why the illustrious economist John Maynard Keynes changed his stance on a position his reply was, ``When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?”

Do your self a favor, call your broker and execute your trading positions.

Happy Trading!

Observations from ADB’s Development Outlook 2007

``It’s a good idea to operate your life on the assumption that unforeseen circumstances are lurking in the shadows, just around the next bend. Which is why it’s wise to handle your finances with the understanding that Fortune does not carry anyone on her shoulders indefinitely.”- Robert Ringer

One of the amazing observations derived from Asian Development’s Bank’s (ADB) recent development outlook can be found in the chart shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: ADB: Treasury Bill Rates: Philippine rates LOWER than US Rates!

We have always argued that the strength of the Peso, so as with the advances of Philippine sovereign bonds, and the Phisix have been determined by foreign portfolio flows at the margin.

However, what seems SO incredible with the picture above is that Philippine short term rates have now been LOWER than that of its US counterpart, as if to suggest that US treasuries have now been seen as “riskier” assets than of Philippine sovereign issues.

Or has the world simply chosen to ignore the context of risks in its past signification? Or has the ocean of liquidity jaded the views of global investors? Or has several theories as “savings glut” (as proposed by Ben Bernanke of the US FED), “lack of investments” (Raghuram Rajan of IMF) or “Asset Shortage” or dearth of bond issuance arising from sustained reforms (Stephen Jen, Charles St-Arnaud of Morgan Stanley) been the underlying factors responsible for the present conditions? In short present conditions have been a worldwide phenomenon and are UNPRECEDENTED by sheer scale and magnitude.

This is what ADB has to say (emphasis mine), ``The banking system’s accumulation of net foreign assets fueled liquidity. Broad money (M3) growth has accelerated in the last few years, driven primarily by this accumulation (Figure 2). In 2006, net domestic credit also reversed from a decline in 2005 to contribute 7.8 percentage points to M3 growth, in large measure reflecting a recovery in credits to the private sector. A decline in the risk premium (based on improved fiscal performance), expectation of peso appreciation, accommodative monetary policy, and buoyant liquidity exerted downward pressure on interest rates. The nominal yield on 91-day treasury bills declined below comparable US treasuries in November (Figure 1) for the first time in 25 years.”

Evidently, Philippine asset classes have benefited from the present dynamics.

Figure 2: ADB: Philippine M3: Buoyant Liquidity Driven by Foreign Assets

Figure 2 simply confirms our long held view that the accumulation of net foreign assets has been important drivers of our asset classes and has contributed immensely to the torrential jump in domestic liquidity.

With even more compressed yields, you may continue to expect more of an impetus to the financial asset classes or to domestic investments. In fact, the FINANCIAL sector has registered the biggest jump in gains among the local industries, according to the IMF’s Selected Issues. Again this is in consonance with the evolving global trends, so much so that with the growing sophistication and the deepening of the financial markets brought about by accelerating trends of integration, such developments are most likely to continue.

In contrast to variable thesis posited presented above, global liquidity, in my view, is a result of massive inflationary activities undertaken by both the public and private domains in the financial world in support of the asset classes from which the present economic structures heavily depend upon.

Figure 3 ADB: Net Capital flows to Emerging Markets Nominal US dollar Exchange Rate Index

Figure 3 shows how strong international fund inflows have thus far boosted the equity markets of the Emerging Markets as well as of Asia Pacific’s. And we also see the same dynamics at work which has led to the firming trend of the Asian region’s currencies.

According to ADB’ Prospects for the world economy 2007 and 2008 (emphasis mine), ``Net private capital flows to emerging Asia amounted to $197.3 billion, only slightly down by 3.9% from the previous year, due to slightly smaller foreign direct investment flows. However, with its strong growth outlook, the region continues to be the primary recipient of private equity investment, attracting again more than 60% of net portfolio equity investment flows to emerging market economies in 2006. Relatively low interest rates and benign liquidity conditions in capital markets have kept private credit flows generally buoyant, benefiting emerging Asian borrowers. Credit spreads remained near record lows for emerging market issuers through most of 2006... Expectations for strong growth will continue to underpin the strength of Asian currencies in 2007, as will narrowing interest rate differentials, due to monetary tightening in some countries.”

Finally, when we talk of globalization, we talk of ever growing trends of greater interdependence in terms of trade and the financial markets. We also discussed in the past of the shared risks and benefits of such phenomenon. ADB affirms this view,

``With its share of exports (on a national accounts basis) close to 50% of GDP in 2006, and its dependence on capital inflows, the Philippines is closely tied to the global economy and to sentiments in international financial markets. This is offset somewhat by the seeming independence of remittances to global disturbances, likely reflecting their diversified origins. Low real interest rates and higher fiscal spending on priority projects should also support growth.

``The peso is likely to maintain its strength, supported by foreign exchange inflows from the balance-of-payments surplus. However, to preserve the price competitiveness of exports against the backdrop of slowing external demand and the appreciation of the peso (in real trade-weighted terms), the central bank may again accumulate foreign exchange reserves to stem the pace of currency appreciation. Measures to liberalize foreign exchange outflows to be effective from April 2007 may also relieve some upward pressure on the peso. They include doubling the amounts of foreign exchange that residents can buy to pay for overseas services and investment abroad....

``The main risk to the projections, apart from the extent of the slowdown in external markets, is the potential impact of the Congressional elections in May 2007. The elections need to be transparent and peaceful, and the fiscal and structural reforms kept on track. Steady progress on privatization will be an important signal to investors on the Government’s commitment.

While we share most of the assessment, the risk side is where we part. As we have previously argued, domestic politics appear to have been desensitized from the activities in the financial markets for as long as the IMPACT to the capital flows framework would be negligible. It is more likely that our financial markets be driven more by developments in the region or of the progress in the financial integration, as the recent “Shanghai Surprise-Yen Carry 2” shakeout last February or that of the May 2006 “Yen Carry” shakedown have shown.

Therefore, the object of our vigilance will continue to be directed at external factors more than that of domestic politics.

History Is NOT A CLOSED BOOK: The View from IMF

``We'll tax and tax, spend and spend, elect and elect because the people are too damn dumb to know the difference." -Harry Hopkins, advisor to FDR

Our basic function is to profit from opportunities presented by market asymmetries. This by acting on perceived favorable probabilities presented by themes, be it momentum (technical) or fundamental (growth, value, economic or business cycles etc...). Yet as previously expounded, the marketplace is NO different from the economy as it is CLOSELY linked with the political trends. In the analogy of an Elementary song “Dry Bones”.... ``your toe bone is connected to your foot bone which is connected to your ankle bone which is connected to your leg bone which is connected to your knee bone...”

Yet, in discerning for themes we aim to EXTRICATE signals from noises, since noises could entrap us to false premises and lead to senseless losses.

On the same grounds, when we hear of camouflaged political noises veneered in the context of moral issues such as “Maid Exports” or “Flawed Culture” or “Rapid Population Growth” circulating to influence the mindsets of public, our response is to challenge the “wisdom of conventional thinking” founded on the popular but on highly specious grounds. Our viewpoint comes in the lexicon of “what we see depends on where we stand” framework.

Our recent series of “History is Not A Closed Book” aims to show of how macro dynamics are MASSIVELY TRANSFORMING both the global economic and political landscape, where domestic politics are likely to take the shape under its growing influences rather than the circulating political bunk masquerading as virtuous “moral” ascendancy.

Yes, while we understand that there are risks to such evolution as signs of rising tide of protectionism, where the recently imposed tariffs by US on China’s paper products could be a symptom of a possible snowballing trend in the US (a political and economic hara-kiri in my view) which may serve to impede on the present developments, we think that to some degree technological advances, economic and financial integration and demographic trends will eventually COMPEL the adaptation of political economies that would best fit into today’s rapidly evolving environment.

For instance, the massive productivity growths in emerging market economies have resulted to tremendous impacts to our lives today. While we have been witnessing a trend of decreasing prices in manufactured goods, as a result of expanded capacity, rapid technological advances on the pace of “Moore’s Law” and surplus labor, on the other hand, increasing price pressures on raw materials and commodities, which reflects the strain by rapidly expanding demand on the on the supply side, is an outgrowth mostly from rising per capita income of emerging market economies.

Since most of these countries have benefited from recent globalization trends, chances are that they won’t opt to spoil the party, and would even work further to improve on this preferred avenue for development.

As testament, China, one of the leading forces in today’s seismic shifts, recently undertook a landmark legislation to protect property rights of its constituents. In the same breadth, China will also undertake a programmed expansion of its financial markets to include financial futures contracts and options beginning April 15^th, and as well, plans to establish a sovereign wealth fund or the world’s largest investment company that would manage its excess reserves which has reached over US$ 1 TRILLION.

These measures serve as growing manifestations of the country’s RECOGNITION of allowing market forces to determine the efficiency of resource allocation for the political SURVIVORSHIP of its ruling class. It is a growing realization that unless wealth spreads, the preservation of their power is jeopardized.

I think it will be no different here, unless of course we decide to do the extremes ala Chavez of Venezuela.

While global investments have been on a general decline as a result of the IT bubble implosion but seen with cautious recovery at present, this has NOT been the case in the local arena as investments have been on a steady declining trend far more than our neighbors as shown in figure 4.

Figure 4 IMF: Rising Share of Services sector while Gross Fixed Capital Formation is on a decline.

According to Wikepedia.org, the concept of statistical aggregate of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF) which is a flow value, is the ``measure of the net new investment by enterprises in the domestic economy in fixed capital assets during an accounting period.” In other words, residents have not partaken into investing domestically, which shows of a declining trend. This has been rightly pointed out by some observers.

However, in contrast to the belief that investments withheld by domestic investors could represent some innate asymmetries, the IMF thinks that present trends could be indications of a transition shift from that of remittances based economy to services based one, also shown above in Figure 4.

According to the IMF (emphasis mine),

``However, the lack of response of investment could also be a transitory phenomenon. Over time, a rise in remittances can cause an endogenous change in consumption-investment decisions. The shifting skill and regional patterns could also have potentially powerful implications for the saving patterns of the dependents in the Philippines who are the end users of these funds. In 1991, nearly 60 percent of families in the Philippines who considered their main income source as coming from abroad came from the bottom two quartiles of the income distribution. By 2003, this share had dropped to just under 18 percent, implying that the share of families in the top two brackets counting income abroad as their main source of income rose from 40 percent to 82 percent. The most likely interpretation of this fact is that the skill set of remitters has shifted exogenously, and there are both “pull” and “push” factors taking higher skilled workers abroad. Given that some 80 percent of families that receive income from abroad as their main source are now middle and high income families, it is much more likely now than in 1991 that the uses for this income go beyond consumption and subsistence, and are put toward saving and investment. This suggests that the lack of a relationship between investment and remittances could indeed be transitory, and that going forward, one may see a pick up in investment in physical capital.”

Figure 5: Gavekal Research: Growing Signs of Massive Capital Investments Boom?

If the IMF thinks that a domestic investment recovery is underway, so did we since last year, as we wrote in Want a Stock Market tip? PGMA’s SONA was a Mouthful, or as early as 2004 [November 29 to December 3, 2004 see Domestic Investment to Help Drive the Phisix?].

Like us, the Gavekal Research team believes that a massive investment boom is imminent in Southeast Asia, where in their recently (February 28^th) issued handbook, Asset Allocation & Economic Research they wrote (emphasis mine),

``One of the key themes of research in 2006 was that Southeast Asia is currently going through a massive capital spending boom (thanks to cheap Chinese machines, higher exchange rates and lower real rates). And everything we look at continues to point towards an unprecedented capital spending boom in ASEAN countries.”

In Figure 5, courtesy of Gavekal Research, the chart of Philippine Imports of Capital Goods shows of a healthy uptrend. This indicates of a reversal from its previous decline following the Asian Crisis. Are we perhaps now witnessing the unfolding of our gradual BOOM scenario?

According to the Gavekal Team, ``As ASEAN starts to spend real money on infrastructure (for example, Mrs. Arroyo just announced a US $20 billion, 4-year infrastructure spending plan for the Philippines), there could be less money making its way to reserves.” Hmmm, sounds familiar?

In a similar plane, we have noted of how the seeds of the infrastructure boom have been sown in India last week, which to the extent reflects the booming Infrastructure theme in Global latitude, and how this should affect the political, economic and investment dimensions.

Now of course, if one would ask WHY the shift to the services industry instead of manufacturing industry? Asian Development Bank (ADB) during their latest development outlook shares with us their insight on the existing malaise of our much maligned industry (emphasis mine),

``In the 1950s, a sophisticated manufacturing sector emerged in the Philippines, supported by protection and a well-developed human capital base (Hill 2003). The problems for manufacturing began subsequently. A combination of factors appear to have played a part, including a period of costly and badly directed interventions, a tendency to focus on protecting rents rather than improving efficiency, poor physical infrastructure, and, to a lesser extent than in India, some problems with labor market regulation. High levels of corruption, disputed property rights and difficulties with contract enforcement have also played their part (ADB 2005). These facets of everyday economic life seem to reflect deeply embedded institutional difficulties including high concentration of wealth and a political system based on patron-client relations (World Bank 2005, p.3).”

So essentially what the ADB in its “Growth Amidst Change” outlook mean is that instead of allowing for market forces to determine the industry’s wellbeing, the country has been engaged in a slew of anti-market forces in forms of policies that cater to protectionism, costly interventions, protection of favored interests (rents), choking regulations, questionable implementations of property rights and contract enforcement.

In short, most politicians and their statist retinues have had a blighted “long-term” record of “saving the country” and in fact, as the ADB shows, have been responsible for compounding our self-inflicted miseries. As Julius Caesar once said, ``All bad precedents begin as justifiable measures.”

Where we always argue that stifling regulations lead to both massive inefficiencies, and imbedded corruption, and where economic opportunities are determined by politicians or by their factotums rather than the market itself (meritocracy; market efficiency determined by efficiency of resource allocation), the result has always been market distortions, little productive savings and investment and the lack of entrepreneurs and or of market opportunities. As been said before, our poverty is a result of dysfunctional and underdeveloped markets.

Here the IMF gives us a list of suggestions for our betterment (emphasis mine),

``Therefore, to move to a decisively stronger growth path, the Philippines needs to prioritize the following areas:

• First, improvements in infrastructure are necessary to support the emerging service sector. For the BPO industry, these include not only continuous upgrading of the technological hardware that has made the Philippines competitive thus far, but also access, in terms of roads and transportation to cities that are new emerging centers for these industries beyond Metro Manila.

• A renewed emphasis on the provision of stronger education, including across engineering and scientific disciplines, are essential if higher value-added overseas jobs, or high value offshore servicing industries are to make the Philippines their home.

• The need for education is further underscored, if the Philippines is to turn its relatively high population growth into a demographic advantage in an “aging” world. Otherwise, sustaining a growing population on income sources that emanate directly or indirectly from abroad with a stagnant set of labor skills could prove untenable.

• Finally, as the demographics of the end-users of income from service sector jobs (domestically and abroad) change, besides education, there is also a need for greater savings out of these incomes, and more productive investments being made using these savings. Absent this, the strong indirect effects from the growth of services which have been seen in other countries may not be realized.”

Except that these proposals come from the IMF itself, have we not dealt with most of these since?

Gavekal, Holy Week and Political Gibberish

My warmest thanks to Mr. Louis Gave and the remarkable GAVEKAL Research team for the compliments; where I was supposedly to purchase their latest publication, “The End is Nigh”, instead got a complimentary set of not one but FOUR books.

It is when the big players whom we’d like to emulate acknowledges our lowly efforts, we feel humbly delighted.

In the observance of Holy Week, our regular outlook will resume on the 15^th of April, although if events warrant, we may post some short insights at my blog.

Finally, heard recently from a newscaster covering the recent hostage taking, “....especially from a country that values most its children.”

Our take: HUH? Isn’t “value” supposedly a subjective word? Our sense of values differs in the context of personal definition. What you value may or may not be the same as mine although in a general sense they could seem or be alike. In the words of Ludwig von Mises, ``All judgments of value are personal and subjective. There are no judgments of value other than those asserting I prefer, I like better, I wish.”

Hence, to arrive at such GENERALIZATION is indeed an outlandish spectacle. One is tempted to ask, on what basis does one derive or attach “VALUE” to merit such assertion; is it because of population growth, educational attainment or educational spending, health, family kinship, cultural ethos or productivity growth or etc. or a combination thereof?

My hunch; statements like this reflect political gibberish on the platform of moralizing from those allegedly are “in the KNOW”. This serves as an example of how the cankers of “toxic noises” pervade media which in turn taint the mindsets of the gullible general public.

Watching the Tape: We’re Keynesians for the Moment

``The exit strategy is painfully simple: Ultimately, it is up to Ben Bernanke – and whether he has both the wisdom and the courage to break the daisy chain of the “Greenspan put.” If he doesn’t, I am convinced that this liquidity-driven era of excesses and imbalances will ultimately go down in history as the outgrowth of a huge failure for modern-day central banking. In the meantime, prepare for the downside – spillover risks are bound to intensify as yet another post-bubble shakeout unfolds.”-Stephen Roach, The Great Unravelling

Lord John Maynard Keynes once said, Markets can remain illogical far longer than you and I can remain solvent. The statement seems indisputably accurate, and when applied in a different context, it simply means we shouldn’t “fight the tape”.

Yep, markets today have rebounded strongly from its recent shakeout lows last late February, and if one were to use the China’s Shanghai Index as barometer to future directional flows, then figure 1 tell us that what was said to have been the epicenter of the latest bout of volatility had been merely a blip.

Figure 1: Chartoftheday.com: Shanghai Composite Index: What Volatility?

The losses during last end-February had been completely erased and with this week’s 5% gain as the Shanghai Index trades at new record HIGHS!

And it is not just a picture of China; we see various markets in all parts of the world, appearing to have been injected with renewed adrenalin.

Figure 2: stockcharts.com: Carry Trade Still At Work?

In figure 2, courtesy of stockcharts.com, we note that the US benchmark, the Dow Jones Industrial Averages (candlestick) bouncing ferociously off its lows coincidental to the decline in the Japanese Yen.

The inflection points (red arrow) of the Japanese Yen seems to ran inversely parallel to the turning points of the Dow Jones (blue arrows) and the JP Morgan Emerging Debt Fund (lower panel-blue arrows).

What this probably implies is that the carry trade is “back in business” and that the declining yen could have provided for the necessary fodder or ammunitions to restore the risk taking activities as reflected by the bounce in emerging market stocks and bonds, as well as in the other asset markets.

While it is to my opinion that the present behavior of markets have been simply cyclical, undergoing a natural corrective phase, then signs are that the US markets following the break from its 50-day, may further advance. However, one noteworthy development is that the breakout came amidst tepid volume (shown above) which leads us to question on the strength or sustainability of the breakout.

The Phisix also has been at the trails of its counterparts rallying 3.52% over the week, with the Peso nearing its record milestone high to close at Php 48.16 per USD over the week. Since we noted that the Phisix and the Peso has shown some relative strength, I will have to change my neutral view on the Phisix, once the Peso breaks its recent high at Php 48.03 to a US Dollar, to a buy.

Of course, IF the Yen have been a crucial factor in determining liquidity conditions allowing for today’s worldwide rally, one must be reminded that the downtrodden Japanese currency in spite of its recent flagging conditions has been drifting near its all time lows relative to the US dollar and the Euro as discussed last March 5 to 9 edition (see US Markets: Risks of Ponzi and Speculative Finance). Hitting support levels usually generate violent reactions which may once again lead to heightened volatility.

The question is IF the Yen has indeed BEEN a pivotal factor in determining liquidity flows.

Figure 3: Stockcharts.com/The Rhodes Report: Yen Volatility has led to Financial Market upheavals

In Figure 3, Richard Rhodes of the Rhodes Report depicts of past financial market upheavals as a result of the Japanese Yen’s volatility. Again, a critically oversold Yen may lead to severe market swings which may affect global asset prices.

Of course, others may argue that the recent rebound by the global markets have been due to statement changes by the US Federal Reserve, indicative of a potential shift in FED policy.

Figure 4: Federal Bank of Saint Louis: Market prices in a RATE CUT?

The indicated changes in the recent FED outlook implies of a slightly weakening economy [from “somewhat firmer” to “mixed”], but still concerned over inflation represented by the price indices [“Recent readings on core inflation have been somewhat elevated” and “the Committee's predominant policy concern remains the risk that inflation will fail to moderate as expected”]. However, the most striking development in the word parsing game over the FED’s statement was the explicit EXCLUSION OF THE “ADDITIONAL FIRMING” clause.

The market seemed quick to interpret this as carte blanche omission of further rate hikes and instead tilted the outlook toward a RATE cut, as shown in Figure 4. ``Interest-rate futures show a 28 percent chance the Fed will lower its target overnight lending rate between banks a quarter- percentage point to 5 percent on June 28” from a Bloomberg report.

In my view, the shift in the statement represents as INSURANCE, where if the US markets would feel the pinch from the ripple effects of the unwinding subprime mortgage implosion towards a greater segment of economy, the FED has made available its “BERNANKE PUT” option or readiness to deploy its contingent “liquidity of last resorts” measures. So those contending that US FED will not intervene have now been given a preview of what comes next. On the other hand, it also marks the concern of the FED over the degree of landing.

In the event that the US economy decelerates more-than-what is-expected the Bernanke Put would likely be set in motion. Whether such actions will successfully reduce the impact of the deterioration has yet to be known although, I am in the camp of PIMCO’s Paul McCulley and Merrill Lynch’s David Rosenberg (March 5 to March 9 edition, see US Markets: Risks of Ponzi and Speculative Finance), who suggests that any forthcoming slowdown in the FED will be LESS determined by the price of credit, again to quote Paul McCulley ``It is also the case that once a speculative bubble bursts, reduced availability of credit will dominate the price of credit, even if markets and policy makers cut the price. The supply side of Ponzi credit is what matters, not the interest elasticity of demand.”

Yet, the bizarre part is how prices can persist to rise in view of an economic deceleration and declining trends in corporate profits. These shows of how distorted market pricing has been and how addicted the global financial economy have been to “low interest rates” and to the “massive creation and intermediation of credit, derivatives and digital money”.

Another timely reminder comes from, William Hester of the Hussman Funds, who warns that present expectations have been derived from conditions different from the past, ``In any case, investors should keep in mind that the stock market's reaction to Fed cuts has historically been dependent on other conditions such as valuations, economic expectations and the slope of the yield curve. The belief that rate cuts strongly benefit the stock market is based on conditions that don't match the present very well. It's possible that a Fed cut might help the stock market later this year. But given current conditions, history doesn't support much risk-taking based on that hope.”

Well, it’s hard to be overly optimistic knowing the possible risks of Damocles’ Sword hanging over the US and global markets via the Carry Trade or the degree of the impact by an imploding US real estate industry. However, Lord Keynes is right in terms of market’s irrationality, which means we shouldn’t fight the tape. Yet we can ACT on using the tape for our benefit.

History Is Not a Closed Book: Signals from Noises, Seeing Opportunities in Problems

``All political thinking for years past has been vitiated in the same way. People can foresee the future only when it coincides with their own wishes, and the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome."-George Orwell

FINANCIAL markets thrive on dissenting opinions. An exchange occurs when a buyer, who buys on the general premise that the price of the financial security will rise in the future; in contrast to a seller, who sells on usually the belief that price of the same financial product will fall, agrees to consummate a deal on an agreed price. And because markets are mostly about psychology and human action, subjective convictions are parlayed into actual risk-taking activities. Curtly said, differences in outlook make trades possible.

Since we write about the financial markets, being that “what we see depends on where we stand”, our opinions are usually subjected to validity test by MEASURE of PERFORMANCES. Markets continually give us a HUMBLING experience where we are often reminded of our vulnerabilities to countless errors from actual SUFFERING or losses. Hence, we try to avoid losses or the angst of suffering by LEARNING from our past mistakes. And in doing so, we countenance the possibility of such shortcomings by keeping an open mind or by accepting views in contradiction to our biases. Therefore, an imperative quality of a successful investor’s mindset is one’s ability to DISTINGUISH the requisite SIGNALS from the confounding NOISES. Some information matters while others don’t.

So in trying to winnow signals from noises, we go back to our assertion that Japan’s aging population will be forced to alter the construct of their “homogenous” society, the latest news from Japan Times shows us some telltale signs ``The Japan Business Federation (Nippon Keidanren) has proposed that skilled foreign workers be allowed to get temporary full-time working positions at Japanese companies in areas where Japanese workers are scarce....The federation said those foreign workers should be accepted from countries that have signed economic partnership agreements with Japan and should be limited to those with skills in areas where Japanese workers are scarce.”

Of course, this is aside from the recent FTA agreement concluded by Japan and the Philippines to test the waters of accepting nurses and caregivers to compliment their declining labor force. In short, demographic trends are gradually shaping the political and economic framework of Japan. What used to be will NOT be.

We see a similar case but from a different angle in India, whose economy seems to resemble our own, allow me to quote at length another favorite columnist of mine, MSNBC Jim Jubak. Please bear in mind that this article is imbued with political, economic and investing dimensions (emphasis mine),

``Somewhere between 30% and 40% of the country's crops rot in the fields or spoil in transit because of the country's creaky infrastructure. There simply isn't any way to get the food to market in time. What does make it through the supply chain is subject to huge markups at each stage of the process, because getting food from warehouse to distribution center to retail store to consumer is so time consuming and cumbersome. Consumers pay twice as much for wheat, for example, than do wholesale buyers. That adds another layer of inflation to food prices at a time when food inflation doesn't need any help in running wild: Wholesale wheat prices jumped 54% between April and November 2006.

``Agriculture isn't the only sector of the economy paying the price. On overcrowded highways, speeds average less than 20 mph. Major cities in some Indian states cut power to factories one day a week. Ships have to be unloaded manually and cargo manually loaded onto trucks. Getting cars the 900 miles from the factory to the port at Mumbai takes one automaker 10 days.

``India spends just 4% of its gross domestic product on infrastructure in comparison to the 9% spent in China. That disparity has existed for more than a decade. As a result, while China has 25,000 miles of expressways, India has just 3,700 miles.

``Facing what amounts to a rebellion by the rural poor over soaring food costs that is likely to cost the ruling Congress Party power in New Delhi, the government budget released in March promises to tackle the infrastructure part of the problem by raising spending on roads, bridges, airports, etc., by 40%. But the government isn't stopping there: It is promoting public-private partnerships on infrastructure projects that are projected to invest $300 billion to $500 billion over the next five years.”

Our take: The political survivorship of its ruling class DEPENDS on delivering affordable basic services to its constituents, where infrastructure bottlenecks in the face of rising demand has resulted to pressures of rising consumer prices which has affected its rural poor.

Hence, the political elite seeks to undertake projects which would facilitate MARKET FORCES by increasing ACCESSIBILITY, promoting COMPETITION and permitting FOREIGN CAPITAL to finance these in order to accomplish such goals. So what you have here is NOT your moral “virtuous” order at work but of allowing market forces to solve its economic and political problems.

On the investing dimension, it goes to show that the infrastructure boom is in GLOBAL LATITUDE which should continue to provide underlying support to the global commodity cycle.

Essentially you have been presented with TWO outstanding complementary themes, INFRASTRUCTURE and COMMODITIES. Notwithstanding, the rapid growth in key emerging markets with SIGNIFICANT POPULATION offers various LATERAL opportunities in many aspects of a rapidly changing world where a ``TRIPLE CONVERGENCE – of NEW players, on a new PLAYING Field, developing NEW processes and habits for HORIZONTAL collaboration”, to quote Thomas Friedman in his marvelous book the WORLD is FLAT, could likely be the important forces that would shape politics and economics in the 21st century.

India and Japan’s present evolutionary experience can best be observed by the following prescient quote lifted from John Maudlin’s equally magnificent book “Just One Thing” on James Dale Davidson and Lord William Rees-Mogg in the Sovereign Individual in 1997...

``In short, the future is likely to confound the expectations of those who absorbed the civic myths of 20^th century industrial society. Among them are the illusions of social-democracy that once thrilled and motivated the most gifted minds. They presuppose that societies evolve in whatever way governments wished them to-preferably in response to opinion polls of scrupulously counted votes. This was never true as it seemed 50 years ago. Now it is an anachronism, as much artifact of industrialism as a rusting smokestack. The civic myths reflect not only a mindset that sees society’s problems as susceptible to engineering solutions; they also reflect a false confidence that resources and individuals will remain as vulnerable to political compulsion in the future as they have been in the 20^th century. We doubt it. Market forces, not political majorities, will compel societies to reconfigure themselves in ways that public opinion will neither comprehend nor welcome.”

Finally we argued that the main reason why the Philippine economy has been sluggish is due to its dysfunctional markets, prompted by various forces. Although we have dealt with this in the past, our aim is to show how inadequate our financial sector has been in providing the necessary savings and investment channels for our domestic capital investments and the corresponding support for the consumer sector.

Figure 5: Barry Ritholz/Wall Street Journal: Banking on Consumers

As shown in Figure courtesy of another favorite analyst Barry Ritholtz, the Philippine banking sector represents only 55% of our GDP considering that the banking sector has been the traditional, if not the dominant source of financing for our enterprises in contrast to developed countries or to some of our neighbors.

Although the chart INTENDS to show of a probable shift from an export-driven paradigm to a consumer driven growth engine by heavyweight emerging markets as India and China, the insufficiency of their financial infrastructure and the narrow breadth and depth of its banking system makes such transition to be graduated. Even so, the massive ongoing wealth transfer from the West to Asia makes such direction almost inevitable.

In the investing spectrum, if you share the conviction that emerging market economies will advance to a level near the developed worlds then investing in the FINANCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE and its BANKING system, which may enhance the breadth and depth of its markets in support of its economic goals are the way to go, aside from the earlier themes I mentioned.

Cloaked beneath every problem are opportunities, seeing it is a matter of choice.

Additions to History Is not a Closed Book

In reply to a comment from a reader, I'd like to make additional clarifications.

Age of Derivatives.

According to BIS, derivatives turnover has reached $431 trillion in October to December alone. According to Financial Week, the notional amount of outstanding OTC (over the counter) was $370 trillion for the first half of 2006 alone. OTC means these are private contracts and are unregulated by authorities.

In addition derivatives is a financial instrument “derived” from some other underlying securities.

Our global economy is only about $45 trillion, while estimated global capital stock is $143 trillion which means derivatives are about 7 times global economy or three times global capital stock.

Since derivative contracts should "derive" from collaterals of other securities this means that the world is 3 times as much leveraged than existing global capital stock.

As Lord Rees Mogg says “Now we have a fashion for high leverage – in derivatives, in private equity and in hedge funds. The global financial system has spread its sails. The momentum is awe-inspiring. There is less transparency than there used to be – investors do not understand derivatives; hedge funds are less transparent than old fashioned investment businesses; private equity is less transparent than public companies.”

While derivative products are meant to reduce risk by diffusion, they do not imply a risk free environment, to quote Kevin Warch, member of the board of Governors of the FED in his speech on Market Liquidity Definitions and implications, ``Even the most sophisticated financial products are not immune to the physical Law of Conservation of Matter – the risk must rest somewhere.”

Well, Warren Buffett, from his personal experience, thinks that Derivatives are a menace and even labels them as Financial Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Keynesians and inflationary policies.

When we say no country wants a strong currency, it means that in order to preserve or gain from the market’s export share, countries’ tend produce or “manipulate” far more money relative to that which is required for economic growth.

For example, if EU’s GDP growth is at 2.5% and money growth is 9.8%, effectively you are seeing a greater supply of money relative to demand. And when supply is larger than demand effectively you reduce the value of the goods or services which is in surplus, such is Economics 101.

The problem here is that all countries are engaged in mass money production and such is the reason why Gold, which is neutral currency, has progressed relative to ALL major currencies and such is the reason why you also see rising consumer prices all over the world.

Best explained by Paul Van Eeden ``When we understand that monetary inflation means an increase in money supply and that an increase in money in money supply causes a devaluation of all the money outstanding we can make sense of the world even as economists, journalists and politicians attempt to obscure the truth.”

You can read more of about this through his link.
http://www.paulvaneeden.com/pebble.asp?relid=506

Even John Maynard Keynes, in his The Economic Consequences of the Peace (1919) piece acknowledges the dangers of monetary inflation or “no country wants a strong currency” phenomenon, ``There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose."

Yet practicing Keynesians (or government interventionists) believe that savings is not an applicable function today simply because they think they are fungible (transferable to assets) and governments will always be the buyers or liquidity providers of last resorts.

As evidence we cite Wharton’s famous Jeremy Siegel, ``Could they precipitate a crisis? Not with the Fed on top of it. The Fed can diffuse any crisis. If everyone gets on one side of the market and things are out of control, the Fed is the ultimate source of liquidity. I think that they can prevent that from spinning out of control.”

Oh, am not Keynesian, as I mentioned, I lean on the Austrian School of Economics persuasion, where real savings matter.

Moreover into currencies, while one may think that the world is trying to “stabilize fluctuations”, what appears to be is not what is. Do you know that Warren Buffett, Bill Gates and George Soros have all bet against “stability” such that they understand the risks of a potential US Dollar Crisis? All the imbalances chatters seem to stem from one source, today’s US Dollar Standard system or Fiat/Paper money system.

Japan and Selective Arguments

The reason I made a comparison on Japan is that self-righteous arguments present only one side of the coin, as earlier explained as cognitive biases. For a balanced view, I injected a broader dimension which considered the suicide rates, credit rating and more importantly demographic trends. The intent is to show a BIGGER picture.

Yes, while I agree that Japan is a homogenous society, investors look to the FUTURE to position for returns. And we understand that economies will NOT thrive under a population that is NOT growing, NOT increasing its TAX base and ECONOMIC base to quote analyst John Maudlin. Therefore, demographic trends will mean a CHANGE in the societal structure of the Japanese in order to maintain their economic weal. What used to be will not be.

As I earlier argued CHANGE is the defining structure of today’s economic landscape from which investors should pay heed to. You may read more about demographic trends in UN’s Replacement Migration.

With regards to India, I’ve said my case.

On Rapid Population Growth

The problem of rapid population growth is not the growth per se. It is the inability of investments to keep up with the pace of its growth, which leads to productivity loss.

In today’s world, aggregate investments are low compared to the past, according to the IMF. And we simply see an upswell of financial markets relative to global GDP which means people are deploying capital derived from thin air to outright speculations rather of direct “productive” investments, hence the global imbalances.

In addition, the context of rapid population growth straining resources has been a longstanding Malthusian argument. To quote Elliot Gue, of the Energy Letters, ``Nevertheless, Malthus’ prediction has proven spectacularly incorrect in the two centuries since his Essay on Population was published. While the global population has continued to grow at the geometric, accelerated pace that Malthus projected, food production also rapidly accelerated after 1750 to more than keep up with that growth. The UK’s population exceeded 17.5 million by 1850 and topped 60 million by the latter part of the 20th century. More importantly, the total world population is at least six times what it was when Malthus penned Essay on Population. Not only has the population increased but so, too, has the consumption of food per capita.”

In other words, today’s commodity cycle has not been solely driven by the dynamics of growing population but of the dynamics of RISING purchasing power from a BROADER base of population. Again Elliott Gue says it best (emphasis mine),

``The United Nations predicts that by 2050 the global population will rise from the current six billion to exceed nine billion, with 5.2 billion living in Asia. Clearly, a growing population spells more demand for all sorts of food. But population growth in Asia plays only a tiny role in the boom in demand for food already apparent in the region. A far more important factor is rapidly rising Asian incomes and the emergence of a middle class. As nations develop and consumers become wealthier, food consumption patterns change. Not only do consumers eat more food, they tend to eat more meat and greater quantities of packaged and processed foods. Income is not the only determinant in these shifts--local tastes, religious practices and regional supplies certainly have an effect--but it is the primary factor behind differences in food consumption between countries and shifts in diets over time.”

I hope this helps.