Again from the New York Times, ``Administration officials committed to flood the financial system with as much as $2.5 trillion — $350 billion of that coming from the bailout fund and the rest from private investors and the Federal Reserve, making use of its ability to print money."
The $2.5 trillion Geithner plan...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5df4/c5df41908efc5571d4b0c43b2886549f53a8dd8e" alt=""
Obviously, the US government's approach in resolving the unsustainable debt problem is to do the same, pile on more debts.
So far, the US government commitments have reached nearly $8.8 trillion and spent $2 trillion according to the New York Times and the Geithner plan and the latest stimulus package should add to this.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f88e2/f88e23904ec90603c510571a97671f0cd9ffd89b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96515/965152db68275f8064b0e31f17f84495128b6cbc" alt=""
And Prudent Bear's Doug Noland has nailed it in his article (bold highlights mine) , ``The Government Finance Bubble is being called upon to reflate with little assistance from private Credit, while at the same time it is faced with a Deeply Maladjusted Economic Structure still overly dependent upon inflationary Credit expansion. Throwing mega-Trillions at our distorted economy is just asking for trouble.
``It is in this context that I fear that the Trillions of Government Finance spent to save the world from “deflation” will, in the end, require perpetual needs for Trillions more. There will be no kick-starting asset Bubbles or a return of private-sector Credit excess. Instead, it will be a case of throwing repeated doses of government-directed finance/purchasing power at the system. Temporary but fleeting economic boosts will then require only stronger doses of artificial stimulus.
``We’ve commenced a new cycle dominated by government electronic printing presses in all their various forms. The inflationary consequences will be a different variety than we’ve grown accustomed to from previous reflations. But the bottom line is – and there’s ample history to support this view – that once the “printing presses” get humming along it’s going to be darn difficult to slow them down."
Overall, a policy of inflation begets more inflation.
And that's where we are likely headed for. But don't count on a benign outcome.
No comments:
Post a Comment