Risk ON Risk OFF is Synonym of The Boom Bust Cycle

Prices are relative: high prices may go higher, while low prices may go lower.

The accretion of price actions is what constitutes a trend. Trends can be seen in a time variant lens: intraday, day, weekly, monthly, yearly or decades.

A bullmarket is when the dominant or major trend is up, while the opposite, a bearmarket is when the major trend is down. A market in consolidation means neither the bulls nor the bears get the dominance.

Yet price trends can be seen in many ways depending on reference points. Having said so, people can make biased and deceptive claims by the manipulating the frame of the trend’s reference points to uphold their perspective.

Meanwhile inflection points extrapolate to a reversal of trends which may allude to major or minor trends.

The actions over the past two weeks may yet be seen as normal correction. That is what I hope it is. But I can’t vouch for this.

We Have Met The Enemy And He Is Us

Yet relying on hope can be a very dangerous proposition. As a popular Wall Street maxim goes, bear markets descends on a ladder of hope. While I am not saying we are in a bear market, it pays to understand that quintessentially “hope” represents the basic shortcoming of vulnerable market participants.

Managing emotional intelligence or having a street smart-commonsensical approach, or prudence is a better a part of valor is my preferred option in dealing with today’s torturous bubble plagued markets[1]. There are times that require valiance, however, I don’t see this as applicable today yet.

As an aside, in testy times as these, market participants should learn how to control their emotions or temperaments so as to prevent blaming somebody else for one’s mistakes, and learn how to take responsibility for their own actions. Self-discipline should be the elementary trait for any investors[2].

Regrets should be set aside for real actions. This means that we can opt to buy, sell or hold, depending on our risk tolerance, time orientation and perception of the conditions of the markets. People forget that holding is in itself an action, because this represents a choice—a means to an end.

And because the average person are mostly afflicted by the heuristic of loss aversion[3] or the tendency to strongly prefer avoiding losses to acquiring gain, in reality since a loss taken signifies an acknowledgement of mistakes, the pain from such admission leads to one to take on more risks that leads to more losses, than to avoiding losses.

As American financial historian, economist, author and educator Peter Bernstein wrote[4],

When the choice involves losses, we are risk-seekers, not risk averse.

Egos, hence, play a big role in shaping our trading, investing or speculative positions.

To borrow comic strip cartoon character Pogo most famous line[5]

We have met the enemy and he is us

The Essence of Risk ON Risk OFF Moments

Nevertheless current developments continue to reinforce my perspective of the markets.

1. Despite all the recent hype about local developments driving the local market, external factors has remained as the prime mover or influence in establishing Phisix price trend. This has been true since 2003. Remember, the Philippine President even piggybacked on this[6]

The good thing about market selloffs is that this has been unmasking of the delusions of greatness and its corollary, the deflation of many puffed up egos.

This also shows that there has been no decoupling

2. Global financial markets have moved in on a Risk On or Risk Off fashion.

While the degree of performances may differ, actions in the global financial markets today have shown increasingly tight correlations. The general trend direction and even the undulations of the Phisix, the US S&P 500, the European Stox 50 and the Dow Jones Asia Pacific index over past 3 years have shown increased degree of conformity.

Risk ON moments are mostly characterized by greater appetite for speculative actions as seen in the correlated upside movements of prices of corporate bonds, equities, commodities, and ex-US dollar currencies.

On the other hand, Risk OFF episodes or risk-averse moments like today, have accounted for “across the board selloffs” a flight to safety shift to the US dollar and US treasuries.

There has been little variance in price trends that merits so-called portfolio diversification. As pointed out before these have been signs of “broken”[7] or highly distorted financial markets.

Observe that whether the actions WITHIN the Philippine Stock Exchange, or among major developed and emerging market bellwethers or the other asset markets, current market trends produces the same Risk ON-Risk OFF patterns.

A dramatic upside move during the first four months only to be substantially reduced this month exhibits little evidence of conventional wisdom at work. Neither earnings can adequately explain the excessive gyrations in market fluctuations nor has contemporary economics.

Risk ON and Risk OFF, are in reality mainstream’s euphemism for boom bust cycles, which have been caused by inflationism and various forms of interventions—that has engendered outsized volatility in price actions.

Knightean Uncertainty: Greece Exit, China Slowdown and Fed’s End Program Volatility

As pointed out last week, there have been three major forces that have been instrumental in contributing to the recent distress being endured by global financial markets, particularly, the SEEN factor: Greece and the Euro crisis, the UNSEEN factors—China’s slowdown (or an ongoing bust???) and anxieties over US monetary policies.

Since risks implies of measured probability of future events while uncertainty refers to the incalculable probability of future events[8], current events suggests of GREATER uncertainty than of the average risk environment.

For the third time in 6 months, the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) last week cut reserve requirements[9], yet the Shanghai index ignored the credit easing measures and posted a significant weekly loss.

Moreover, the economic slowdown in China has hardly abated.

China’s four biggest banks reported almost zero growth of net lending over the past two weeks[10].

In addition, according to a study by made by a think tank affiliated with PRC’s state council, the estimated the debt-to-asset ratio[11] of Chinese state and private companies, as well as individuals, has reached about 105.4 percent, the highest among 20 countries.

These represent the increasing likelihood of the unwinding of China’s unsustainable bubble. For the moment China’s authorities seems to be in a quandary as they have implemented half-hearted measures which her domestic markets appear to have taken in blase.

Yet if the economy does sharply deteriorate, I would expect more forceful policies to be put in place. So far this has not been the case.

It has been no different in the Euroland where politics have posed as an obstacle to further interventions from the European Central Bank (ECB)

The risks of a Greece exit from the Eurozone seem to have been intensifying. This has been evidenced by the open acknowledgement by Mario Draghi, European Central Bank president, that Greece could leave the Euro. The ECB has even halted to provide loans to four Greek banks[12].

Lending to banks in Greece, which has been experiencing slow-mo bank runs but seem to be escalating over the last week on fears of massive devaluation from the return to the drachma[13], are presently being funded by the national central bank of Greece[14] via the Emergency Lending Assistance.

While there have been estimates as to the degree of exposures by major banks of several nations on Greece, particularly €155 billion for Germany and France[15], no one can really assess on the psychological impact that would translate to financial losses that may occur once official ties have been disconnected. Even Singapore has reportedly been exposed with “a stunning 60%-plus of GDP tied up in European bank claims” according to Zero Hedge[16].

Add to this undeclared the derivatives exposure on Greek securities at an estimated $90 billion[17], the losses from a full blown contagion can reach trillions to the global banking system.

Thus, the probability looms large that that major central banks would use this as an excuse to justify massive inflationism to protect their respective banking systems.

Again the problem that prevents the ECB from further inflating today has been the uncertain status from the politics of Greece. Since nobody in Greece seems to be in charge, the ECB doesn’t know whom to strike a deal with yet. And perhaps in an attempt to influence Greek politics, as stated above, the ECB has partially cut off funding to some Greece banks.

So this should be another evidence of the interruptions of the money spigots.

But the issue here will be the scale of interventions once the process of the Greece exit is set on motion. This will practically be a race between the market and central bank interventions.

And this is why I believe the markets could be exposed to excessively huge volatility during this May to June window, mostly likely with volatility going in both directions, but having more of a downside bias, until the forcefulness of interventions would be enough to temporarily provide patches to malinvestments from becoming evident.

And perhaps in the realization of the risks from financial isolation and the benefits of conditional redistribution from their German hosts, the good news is that the pro-austerity or the pro-bailout camp appears to be gaining ground.

Recent polls seem to suggest that pro-bailouts as having a slight edge[18] or are in dead heat[19] with former favorites, the anti-austerity camp.

The term austerity has been deliberately contorted by the neoliberals. In reality there has been NO real[20] austerity[21] in the Eurozone as government spending (whether nominal, real or debt to gdp) has hardly been reduced. What has been happening has been more of tax increases with little reforms on the labor market or on the regulatory front to make these economies competitive[22][23].

Finally, compounded by external developments, US markets are likewise being buffeted by the uncertainty towards the Fed’s monetary policies where each time the FED ended their easing measures, downside volatility follows.

This was the case for QE 1 and QE 2, and apparently with the closing of OPERATION TWIST this June, US markets have become volatile again.

And as the US markets has recently sagged, the Federal Market Open Committee (FOMC) once again has signaled that they are open to more credit easing measures using the Euro crisis and the US government budget and or debt-ceiling issues[24] as pretext.

The so-called Bush Tax cuts which is set to expire at the end of the year, will translate to a broad increase in tax rates for all[25], will also be a part of the economic issue. Tax increases in a fragile economy heightens a risk of a downturn, and this will likely be met with more easing policies.

Bottomline: The major issues driving the markets has been about the feedback loop between the markets and inflationism (bubble cycles).

Lethargic prices of financial assets have accounted for as symptoms of the artificiality of price levels set by the governments and major central banks through credit easing programs and zero bound interest rates meant to protect the banking system that has been integral to the current political structures which includes the welfare-warfare state and central banking.

In short, falling markets are simply signs of pricked bubbles.

Outside additional support from central banks, asset prices have been weakening, supported by some episodes of debt liquidations, particularly in the Eurozone and in China.

Currently the PBoC, ECB or the FED appear to be constrained or reluctant to pursue with further aggressive interventions for one reason or another. As previously noted, the BoE has officially put to a halt their QE[26].

It could be that they may be waiting for more downside volatility, which should provide them political cover for such action. Also the unresolved political problems of Greece have been an impediment.

So yes, today’s markets have still principally been driven by the ON and OFF steroids or inflationism from central bankers and will continue to do so until markets or politics forces them to cease.

---

[1] See Applying Emotional Intelligence to the Boom Bust Cycle, August 21, 2011

[2] See Self-Discipline and Understanding Market Drivers as Key to Risk Management, April 2, 2012

[3] Wikipedia.org Loss aversion

[4] Bernstein Peter Against The Gods, The Remarkable Story of Risks, p. 273 John Wiley & Sons

[5] Wikipedia.org "We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo (comic strip)

[6] See The Message Behind the Phisix Record High May 7, 2012

[7] See “Pump and Dump” Policies Pumps Up Miniature and Grand Bubbles April 30, 2012

[8] See The Fallacies of Inflating Away Debt August 9, 2009

[9] See China Cuts Reserve Requirement May 14, 2012

[10] Businessweek.com/Bloomberg.com Loan Growth Stalled at China’s Biggest Banks, News Says May 15, 2012

[11] Bloomberg.com Chinese Company Debt Is At ‘Alarming Levels,’ Xinhua Says May 17, 2012

[12] See Hot: ECB Holds Loans to Select Greek Banks, ECB’s Draghi Talks Greece Exit May 17, 2012

[13] MSNBC.com Greeks withdraw $894 million in a day: Is this beginning of a run on banks?, May 16, 2012

[14] Brussel’s Blog The slow-motion run on Greece’s banks Financial Times, May 17, 2012

[15] See Greece Exit Estimated Price Tag: €155bn for Germany and France, Possible Trillions for Contagion May 17, 2012

[16] Zero Hedge Why Stability Stalwart Singapore Should Be Seriously Scared If The Feta Is Truly Accompli, May 18, 2012

[17] Zero Hedge, Alasdair Macleod: All Roads In Europe Lead To Gold, May 19, 2012

[18] See Are Greeks turning Pro-Austerity? May 19, 2012

[19] Reuters India Greek election race tightens into dead heat May 20, 2012

[20] See More on the Phony Fiscal Austerity, May 16, 2012

[21] See In Pictures: The Eurozone’s “Austerity” Programs, May 8, 2012

[22] See Choking Labor Regulations: French Edition, May 14, 2012

[23] See Greeks Mount Civil Disobedience, Scorn Taxes, May 16, 2012

[24] Bloomberg.com Several on FOMC Said Easing May Be Needed on Faltering, May 17, 2012

[25] See What to Expect when the Bush Tax Cuts Expire May 19, 2012

[26] See Bank of England Halts QE for Now, May 10, 2012

Achieving Financial Independence

Self development guru and author Michael Masterson lists Eight Rules for Financial Independence

Mr. Masterson at the Early to Rise writes, (italics mine, bold original)

When I decided to become rich, I began to keep a journal of thoughts I had about making money, losing money, and building wealth.

One chapter of that journal had to do with financial independence. And the eight rules I came up with then are the same rules I follow today:

1. You can't truly trust anybody but yourself with your money.

2. The harder someone tries to convince you to trust him, the less you should.

3. However good a track record someone has, never believe that he/she can't suddenly start your losing money. In fact, if you are like me, the moment you invest will be the moment his/her track record starts falling apart.

4. All markets rise and fall. Don't ever believe anyone who assures you that they can predict the future.

5. If you don't learn to spend less than you make, you will never have peace of mind.

6. Most of what you buy when your income is above $100,000 is discretionary. Don't fool yourself into thinking you need a big house or a fancy car.

7. In making financial projections for yourself or a business, always create three scenarios: one that shows what things will look like if everything goes as hoped; one that shows what will happen if things are mediocre; and one that shows what will happen if things fall apart.

8. Know that the third scenario is optimistic.

Add these up, and you will come to one inevitable conclusion:

The only way to be truly financially independent is to have multiple streams of income, each one of them sufficient to pay for the lifestyle you want to live.

The above mostly signifies common sense, contingency planning. determination and persistence all of which constitutes self-discipline.

Yet the most important point by Mr. Masterson is that “you cannot anybody but yourself.” This resonates with my latest advice:

What can be given are information relevant to attaining knowledge and skills. What can NOT be given is the knowledge that dovetails to one’s personality for the prudent management of one’s portfolio. Like entrepreneurship this involves a self-discovery process.

And most importantly, what can NOT be given are the attendant actions to fulfill the individual’s objectives.

Bottom line: Attaining financial independence starts with the self (Latin “Ï”), or the ability to think independently.

“Pump and Dump” Policies Pumps Up Miniature and Grand Bubbles

A friend recently called to say that there have been numerous accounts of “miniature bubbles” in the local markets. Others claim that these have been brought about by unscrupulous people engaged in “pump and dump”.

In reality as I have been pointing out, miniature bubbles are symptoms of the ultimate bubble blower—central bank policies. Central bank policies distort people’s incentives towards money. Savings, investment and consumption patterns will have all been skewered. Where negative real rates punish savers, naturally people whose savings are being diminished through the erosion of purchasing power will seek higher yield, and thus, redeploy their savings into other activities which may include more consumption activities, speculation or high risk investments and or take up more debt to fund these activities. Even private sector Ponzi schemes has been flourishing under today’s environment[1]

In essence policies that tamper with money motivates the public to value short term over the long term.

Thus heightened price volatilities which are deemed as “pump and dump” or as “miniature bubbles” represent as symptoms rather than the cause. People will look for excuses to push up prices or speculate for the simple reason that policies have egged them to do so.

The easy money climate lures the vulnerable public to go for momentum and chase prices using any available tools (charts, corporate fundamentals or even tips[2] and rumors) to do so. And this is why pump and dumps happen.

Large price swings make some people think that stock market operators are culpable for such swing. But this would be mistaking trees for the forests. Absent easy money policies, bubbles and pump and dumps hardly has been a feature. Had there been mini bubbles or pump and dumps during the bear market of 2007-2008? No, because inflated assets were all deflating in response or as contagion to the real estate-banking crisis abroad.

Broken Markets

And as earlier pointed out[3], the US today has not been different, junk bonds or high yielding debt has been booming.

Writes the Buttonwood (Philipp Coggan) of the Economist[4]

Of course, the broader point is that investors are being pushed into these high-yielding assets because of the policy of the Fed (and most developed world central banks) of keeping interest rates close to zero. Similar reasoning drove the enthusiasm for structured products that financed the subprime boom.

Zero bound rates have prompted for yield chasing actions, here or in the US.

The mainstream finally comes to admit what I have been saying all along—that markets have been vastly distorted where one cannot use “fundamentals” in the traditional and conventional sense to evaluate investments.

The excessive price volatility in today’s markets does not match with the fluctuations of conventional metrics of financial ratios. Today’s price volatility has been incongruent with trends of corporate fundamentals. And thus as I earlier pointed out[5], anyone who believed in “fundamentals” would have sold as early as March.

Considering the huge jump in prices from the start of the year, we should be around at near the peak of 2007. So anyone who believes in this stuff ought to be shorting or selling the market. I won’t.

The left window from the chart above as I earlier posted last March has a time series that ended November of 2011. The right chart from DBS represents a more updated one albeit was updated until last March. Considering that the Phisix has now been drifting at over 5,150 which means valuations continues to climb higher away from these charts, the Phisix has become “priciest” stock market in Asia.

Yet leaning on earnings or conventional fundamental metrics, like the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, becomes a permanently moving target which is impossible to pin down, especially punctuated under today’s easy market climate.

Will I sell on the account of earnings/fundamentals? My answer is still no. Not until interest rates climb in response to consumer price inflation, or through heightened demand for credit, or questions over credit quality of government papers or the scarcity of capital becomes apparent[6]. Nominal interest rates are not a one-size-fits-all thing, and there are many measures (like real interest rates, CDS, yield curve et.al.) to gauge if the monetary environment has begun to tighten for one reason or another. This also should come in the condition that the hands of central bankers have also been shackled and would be unable to respond forcefully as they have been doing today.

For now central banks around will continue to find ways and means to push more easing measures in support of the asset markets which was highlighted by last week’s additional stimulus by the Bank of Japan (BoJ)[7]

The following excerpt from the mainstream loudly resonates on what I have been saying.

From the Financial Times[8],

Markets are broken. Accepted investment wisdom has been overturned and the basic tenets of value and diversification no longer work. The financial crisis put the market into a volatile “risk on, risk off” – or Roro – mode for which there is no cure.

For many investors, this has made stockpicking seemingly an impossible task. Markets once responded to their fundamentals. Now, disparate assets have a much greater tendency to move together, individual characteristics lost. Trusted strategies such as relative value and currency carry trades are nearly useless, overwhelmed by daily market-wide volatility.

“Assets now behave as either risky assets or safe havens, and their own fundamentals are secondary,” writes HSBC strategist Stacy Williams in a recent note. “In a world where most asset classes are synchronised, it becomes very difficult to achieve diversification. It also means that since most individual assets are dominated by a common price component, it becomes increasingly futile to invest in them based on their usual fundamentals.”

Though asset classes had been moving in closer correlation since the start of the financial crisis in 2007, the Roro trend became most apparent after the collapse of Lehman Brothers a year later. The uncertainty helped turn investing bimodal, where every price has been contaminated by systemic risk. Everything became a bet on whether we were closer to a global recovery or to deeper crisis.

So what recommendations do they offer for the public to deal with the state of “broken markets? They have three. One is to pick a position from the boom or the bust scenario, second is to chase momentum and third is to hedge positions through index futures.

I would like to emphasize on the second option, not because this is my preferred approach but because of its relevance to the conditions of the local markets, from the same article,

Another option is to seek out an investment strategy that still works. Momentum investing – in effect, buying the winners and selling the losers – is a method that HSBC analysts highlight as having been largely impervious to the risk trade. To chase a trend aims to harvest small but systematic mispricing of assets, and there is no reason to suppose these anomalies would disappear in bimodal markets, the broker argues. (In this context, the growth of high-frequency trading since the start of the crisis is unlikely to be coincidental.)

This simply means that the mainstream will largely be chasing momentum, by targeting frequency over magnitude through “harvest small but systematic mispricing of assets”. So in essence, high risk speculative activities or gambling (a.k.a “miniature bubbles” and “pump and dump”) has been recognized as the common or standardized feature of the current market place. So history will rhyme and a bust will be around the corner.

I would rather “time” the bubble cycle rather than go chasing prices. And this is why it is imperative for any serious investors to understand the bubble process or the boom bust cycle.

Stock Market is about Human Action

Finally financial markets signify a social phenomenon. There is a popular aphorism from former President John F. Kennedy, who said in the aftermath of the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion[9], which seems relevant to the financial markets,

Victory has a thousand fathers; defeat is an orphan.

Winning issues and or market tops tend to attract substantial participants as a function of easy money (get rich quick mentality), keeping up with the Joneses (bandwagon effect) or survivorship bias (focus on survivors or winners at the expense of the others) or social signaling (desire for greater social acceptance, elevated social status and or ego trips).

On the other hand market bottoms results to the opposite: depression, avoidance, isolation and animus behaviour for those caught by the crash.

Most people don’t realize that emotional intelligence or self discipline is key to surviving the market’s volatility, not math models or charts or any Holy Grail or Greek formulas. And this comes from the desire to attain self discipline than from advices of other people.

Yet self discipline is earned and acquired through knowledge and through the whetting of one’s skills based on these accrued knowledge. Alternatively, self discipline cannot be not given or inherited. And that’s why I vehemently opposed the suggestion by a popular religious personality, who had investments on a mutual fund, to get housemaids to invest in the stock market[10].

The incentive to acquire the desired knowledge and skills varies from individual to individual because they are largely driven by the degree of stakeholdings or the stakeholder’s dilemma or stakeholder’s problem[11].

Today’s information age has democratized access to information. What can be given are information relevant to attaining knowledge and skills. What can NOT be given is the knowledge that dovetails to one’s personality for the prudent management of one’s portfolio. Like entrepreneurship this involves a self-discovery process.

And most importantly, what can NOT be given are the attendant actions to fulfill the individual’s objectives.

Stock market investing is about people and their actions. That’s why this is a social phenomenon. No more, no less.

---

[1] See After 5,000: What’s Next for the Phisix?, March 5, 2012

[2] See New Record Highs for the Philippine Phisix; How to Deal with Tips February 20, 2012

[3] See Self-Discipline and Understanding Market Drivers as Key to Risk Management, April 12, 2012

[4] Buttonwood Hooked on junk, April 27, 2012, The Economist

[5] See Earnings Drive Stock Prices? International Container Terminal and Ayala Land, March 6, 2012

[6] See Global Equity Market’s Inflationary Boom: Divergent Returns On Convergent Actions, February 13, 2002

[7] See Bank of Japan Adds More Stimulus, April 17, 2012

[8] Financial Times ‘Roro’ reduces trading to bets on black or red April 20, 2012

[9] Quotationspage.com Quotation Details John F. Kennedy, "A Thousand Days," by Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr [1965]., p289. Comment made by JFK in the aftermath of the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, 1961.

[10] See Should Your Housemaid Invest In The Stock Market? September 5, 2010

[11] See Knowledge Acquisition: The Importance of Information Sourcing and Quality, March 6, 2011

Self-Discipline and Understanding Market Drivers as Key to Risk Management

Here is an investment tip for those who wish to protect themselves from market volatilities [dedicated to my friends at Stock Market Pilipinas]

As I have been writing, inflationary bullmarkets tend to inflate almost every issue on the stock exchange (rotational process).

This does not apply only to stocks but also to other assets.

In the US, small caps have been beating large caps… (US Global Investors)

…while junk bonds have been thrashing investment grade bonds as US companies with junk ratings pile into the bond markets at record pace to take advantage of ultra low interest rates (Wall Street Journal)

These are evidences of yield chasing phenomenon as an offshoot to central bank policies.

Because the world has been flushed with money, this only implies of highly volatile markets which are characterized by huge swings or strong surges and equally sharp retracements.

Again inflationary markets will tend to push up almost every issue but in different degrees and at different times. This impacts the stock markets in a similar manner. Eventually we will see this happen in consumer prices.

The same phenomenon impacts the second or third tier issues in the local markets, as money spillovers into the broader market.

Second while there will always be unscrupulous people (or stock market manipulators or operators), pump and dump and short and distort are activities that are difficult to establish.

Take for example of the 6 major holding issues constituting the Holding firm index of the Philippine Stock Exchange, 4 have been drifting in near or at record levels.

DM Consunji [PSE: DMC, RED], JG Summit [PSE: JGS, black], and Aboitiz Equity Ventures [PSE: AEV, black] (I did not include Ayala Corp [PSE: AC] because AC has yet to beat, but is about to, the 2007 high)

Are the record levels of stock prices of heavy caps JGS, AEV and DMC (and partly AC) justifying their valuations? So does this make JGS, AEV and DMC a pump and dump?

Some would say no because they are heavyweights (highly liquid issues with real cash flows). But this is would be a non-sequitor or irrelevant to the issue.

The following are the income statement statistics and estimates from 4-traders.com

JGS Summit

Aboitiz Equity Ventures

DMCI

The crux of the matter is: does the earnings trend justify the current price volatility?

In my view no, earnings in the contemporary sense DO NOT justify such volatility as shown above. There seems hardly any correlation between corporate performance and stock prices

And again this brings to fore the largely mistaken orthodox belief about earnings.

Today it has hardly earnings that drive prices but high powered money from central banks. By such thesis, one would understand the nature of inflationary booms and deflationary busts (Was there any pump and dump during the bear market in 2007-2008?)

Nevertheless here are very important tips for stock market participants to keep in mind which I will convey through the wisdom of my favorite stock market savants

Warren Buffett: Risk comes from not knowing what you are doing.

Warren Buffett: The dumbest reason in the world to buy a stock is because it's going up

My comment: Both of the above quotes from Mr. Buffett are intertwined.

Apparently many participants, both neophytes and veterans, are drawn to the fervent desire to earn fast buck while at the same time disregarding the risks involved that makes them easily fall prey to market volatilities and to manipulators.

Jesse Livermore (my all time favorite): “the average man doesn't wish to be told that it is a bull or bear market. What he desires is to be told specifically which particular stock to buy or sell. He wants to get something for nothing. He does not wish to work. He doesn't even wish to have to think. It is too much bother to have to count the money that he picks up from the ground.”

My comment:

Many people don't really want to think.

Example: getting information from newspapers and extrapolating them into investment isn't thinking at all. 50k-100k people read business section of the newspapers everyday. This means by the time one reads the newspaper, others may have already read them and may have already acted on the new information provided.

Yet in reality, these newspaper based information are likely to affect markets over the short run and are splashed with logical errors and fallacies.

That’s why I call the allure of mainstream media’s information as largely toxic.

So instead of working to get ahead of the curve, one acts at the tailend. As a famous Wall Street axiom goes,

Bulls make money, bear make money but pigs get slaughtered.

The desire to improve one’s grasp of the markets requires further scrutiny and goes beyond the conventional analytical methodology.

Moreover, many want to use the stock market to talk themselves or bloat their egos.

Aside from the economic role, stock markets or financial markets have social aspects, which is evident by the bandwagon effects.

More quotes of wisdom

Jesse Livermore: I began to realize that the big money must necessarily be in the big swing. Whatever might seem to give a big swing its initial impulse, the fact is that its continuance is not the result of manipulation by pools or artifice by financiers, but depends on underlying conditions. And no matter who opposes it, the swing must inevitably run as far and as fast and as long as the impelling forces determine.”

Jesse Livermore: In actual practice a man has to guard against many things, and most of all against himself—that is, against human nature.

The basic lesson from the above is that in order to protect one self, one needs to practice self-discipline which means controlling emotions or egos (Emotional Intelligence), as well as, to understand the underlying conditions of the marketplace.

As I previously noted, relying on tips and rumors can be a disastrous proposition.

Manipulators are hardly responsible for losses incurred by market participants. In reality, it is the self who is mostly culpable. Worst, it is policies of political authorities that influences people’s incentives to become short term oriented and to undertake reckless activities and makes them vulnerable to bubbles and to manipulation.

Are High IQs Key to Successful Investing?

Yale Professor Robert Shiller thinks so.

Writing at the New York Times,

YOU don’t have to be a genius to pick good investments. But does having a high I.Q. score help?

The answer, according to a paper published in the December issue of The Journal of Finance, is a qualified yes.

The study is certainly provocative. Even after taking into account factors like income and education, the authors concluded that people with relatively high I.Q.’s typically diversify their investment portfolios more than those with lower scores and invest more heavily in the stock market. They also tend to favor small-capitalization stocks, which have historically beaten the broader market, as well as companies with high book values relative to their share prices.

The results are that people with high I.Q.’s build portfolios with better risk-return profiles than their lower-scoring peers.

Certainly, caution is needed here. I.Q. tests are controversial as to what they measure, and factors like income, quality of education, and family background may not be completely controlled for. But the study’s results are worth pondering for their possible implications.

So how valid is such claim?

Let’s get some clues from some of my favorite investors.

Here is the legendary Jesse Livermore (bold emphasis mine)

The market does not beat them. They beat themselves, because though they have brains they cannot sit tight. Old Turkey was dead right in doing and saying what he did. He had not only the courage of his convictions but also the intelligence and patience to sit tight.

When I am long of stocks it is because my reading of conditions has made me bullish. But you find many people, reputed to be intelligent, who are bullish because they have stocks. I do not allow my possessions – or my prepossessions either – to do any thinking for me. That is why I repeat that I never argue with the tape.

Mr. Livermore simply posits that intelligence can be overwhelmed by egos and cognitive biases (particularly in the second quote the endowment effect, Wikipedia.org—where people place a higher value on objects they own than objects that they do not.).

Here is the 10 investing principles by another investing titan the late Sir John Templeton

1. Invest for real returns 2. Keep an open mind 3. Never follow the crowd 4. Everything changes 5. Avoid the popular 6. Learn from your mistakes 7. Buy during times of pessimism 8. Search worldwide 9. Hunt for value and bargains 10. No-one knows everything

More from John Templeton

“Bull markets are born on pessimism, grown on skepticism, mature on optimism and die on euphoria. The time of maximum pessimism is the best time to buy, and the time of maximum optimism is the best time to sell.

Here is value investor turned crony, Warren Buffett. I’d say that Mr. Buffett’s original wisdom has been a treasure. (bold emphasis mine)

‘I will tell you how to become rich. Close the doors. Be fearful when others are greedy. Be greedy when others are fearful.’

‘Read Ben Graham and Phil Fisher read annual reports, but don’t do equations with Greek letters in them.’

‘Never invest in a business you cannot understand.’

‘You’re neither right nor wrong because other people agree with you. You’re right because your facts are right and your reasoning is right – that’s the only thing that makes you right. And if your facts and reasoning are right, you don’t have to worry about anybody else.’

Does all the above sound like high IQ stuff? Evidently they represent more common sense and the school of hard knocks stuff.

Yet to the contrary, high IQs can translate to portfolio disasters.

The landmark bankruptcy by Long Term Capital Management in 1998 had been a company headed by 2 Nobel Prize winners. The company’s failure has substantially been due to flawed trading models.

In 2008, the 5 largest US investment banks vanished. These companies had an army of economists, statisticians and quant modelers, accountants, lawyers and all sort of experts who we assume, because of their stratospheric salaries and perquisites, had high IQs.

When Queen Elizabeth asked why ‘no one foresaw’ the crisis coming, the reply by the London School of Economics (LSE)

"In summary, Your Majesty," they conclude, "the failure to foresee the timing, extent and severity of the crisis and to head it off, while it had many causes, was principally a failure of the collective imagination of many bright people, both in this country and internationally, to understand the risks to the system as a whole."

Imagination had been scarce because the same army of experts heavily relied on mathematical models in dealing with investments. They did not follow the common sense advise by the real experts.

My favorite iconoclast author Nassim Taleb in Fooled by Randomness offers an explanation (emphasis added)

it is also scientific fact, and a shocking one, that both risk detection and risk avoidance are not mediated in the “thinking” part of the brain but largely in the emotional one (the “risk as feelings” theory). The consequences are not trivial: It means that rational thinking has little, very little, to do with risk avoidance. Much of what rational thinking seems to do is rationalize one’s actions by fitting some logic to them.

What the consensus mistakenly thinks as rational is, in reality, the emotional. Thus, we need more Emotional Intelligence (EI) rather than high IQs

The most important observation or lesson is one of the repeated botched attempts by high IQ people to transform investing into ‘science’.

Well, because investing involves people’s valuations and preferences, all of which constitutes human action, in truth, investing is more than science…

As the great Ludwig von Mises explained. (bold highlights mine)

For the science of human action, the valuations and goals of the final order at which men aim constitute the ultimate given, which it is unable to explain any further. Science can record and classify values, but it can no more "explain" them than it can prescribe the values that are to be acknowledged as correct or condemned as perverted. The intuitive apprehension of values by means of understanding is still not an "explanation." All that it attempts to do is to see and determine what the values in a given case are, and nothing more. Where the historian tries to go beyond this, he becomes an apologist or a judge, an agitator or a politician. He leaves the sphere of reflective, inquiring, theoretical science and himself enters the arena of human action.

...but rather, investing is an art.

Again Professor Mises from the same article.(emphasis added)

The position of science toward the other values of acting men is no different from that which it adopts toward aesthetic values. Here too science can do no more with respect to the values themselves than to record them and, at most, classify them as well. All that it can accomplish with the aid of "conception" relates to the means that are to lead to the realization of values, in short, to the rational behavior of men aiming at ends.

Bottom line: The art of managing our emotions or emotional intelligence, via common sense and self-discipline, is more important than having high IQs.

Learning from the Financial Mistakes of Sports Celebrities

Ron Lieber of the New York Times offers 3 lessons to the financial blunders of sports celebrities (bold highlights mine)

Michael Vick will take the field on Sunday wearing the uniform of the Philadelphia Eagles, who took him in after his imprisonment for helping to run a dogfighting ring.

But thanks to his personal bankruptcy filing after he went to jail, he will also be playing for BMW Financial Services, Dodson Pest Control, Summertime Pool and the Monticello Woods Homeowners Association. They are not sponsors. Instead, they and many others have a claim on his future earnings.

Bankrupt professional athletes are a sad fixture on the sports scene, and Mr. Vick isn’t even alone among quarterbacks who have hit the financially injured reserve list. The former Cleveland Browns star Bernie Kosar and the current New York Jets backup, Mark Brunell, have had their brushes with bankruptcy, too.

Sports stars may or may not mess up more often than the average person who earns a lot of money really fast, but their troubles seem outsize because of their fame and the pathetic schemes they fall for. The stakes are high for football players in particular, since their average professional career lasts just four seasons or so and may leave lingering injuries and the health costs or physical limitations that come with them.

Mr. Vick is the rare athlete who is getting a second chance. His lucrative new contract with the Eagles should allow him to pay all of his creditors in full.

Read the rest here

Mr. Lieber’s lessons can be summed up as: avoiding “questionable schemes” of investments, limiting “outsize financial gestures” or largesse and seeking “professional financial help”

It is true that throwing money to businesses or to financial assets, where insufficiency of knowledge or comprehension to the undertaking dominates, does not represent investments, but gambling.

Also, it takes a lot of introspection to manage the ego. This would be the most difficult part, self-control. As Confucius once said, he who conquers himself is the mightiest warrior.

And lastly, professional help represents an option but not a prerequisite.

That’s because as I have previously stated

financial success depends on a simple equation:

Income – Expense = deficit or surplus

If spending is greater than income where constant excess spending is financed by drawing from future income (debt), one ends up consuming wealth…

It would need or take only common sense and self-discipline to observe this rule.

And common sense says that self-education should account for a vital part of the action to achieve self-discipline or emotional intelligence.

Only after financial goals and limitations have been established, is when the need for professional help arises. That’s because carte blanche delegation of personal finances would signify as high risk proposition, for the simple reason that a fund manager’s incentives may not align with those of the client.