Showing posts with label global recession. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global recession. Show all posts

Monday, May 11, 2020

As Predicted, The Global Recession has Arrived, Will Depression Be Next?



A permanent lowering of the interest rate can only be the outcome of increased capital formation, never the result of any technical banking measures. Attempts to achieve a long-term lowering of interest rates by expanding the circulation credit of the banks ineluctably result in a temporary boom that leads to a crisis and to a depression—Ludwig von Mises

In this issue

As Predicted, The Global Recession has Arrived, Will Depression Be Next?
-The Wile E. Coyete Moment: From China to the World
-We Live in Interesting Times! Negative Oil Prices and Worst US Job Losses Since the Great Depression
-The Unseen Consequences from the Uncharted Global Fiscal and Monetary Bailout! Depression Ahead?
-The Bernanke Doctrine in Motion!
As Predicted, The Global Recession has Arrived, Will Depression Be Next?

The Wile E. Coyete Moment: From China to the World

When about 760 million or 50% of China’s population had been immobilized and placed under home quarantine by their government in response to the COVID-19 epidemic, I predicted that this would spur a global recession.

Back then*, I called this China’s Wile E. Coyote moment.

Figure 1

In the fulfillment of this watershed moment, last mid-April, China’s first-quarter GDP reported a 6.8% contraction, its first in a few decades!

And considering that the lockdown, which began on the 23rd January in Wuhan, Hubei which spread to over 80 cities in nearly 20 provinces and municipalities that lasted mostly through March, many analysts have come to dispute the reported GDP’s accuracy. The Wuhan lockdown was lifted on April 8th.

Nevertheless, the record economic contraction has prompted the Chinese government to rethink about setting up GDP targets for 2020. According to a report from the Bloomberg/Economic Times, “China’s leaders are considering the option of not setting a numerical target for economic growth this year given the uncertainty caused by the global coronavirus pandemic, according to people familiar with the matter.” Is this a facing saving measure for an embattled ruling class, the CCP?

In the meantime, the rapid transmission of COVID-19 across the globe has eventually prompted the World Health Organization (WHO) to admit on March 11 that this was a pandemic, more than a month after declaring a public health emergency on January 30. Given the speed of transmission, why did it take so long for them to consider?

The pandemic character has been so obvious that even this layman** can distinguish!


To “flatten the curve” by social or physical distancing, many countries embraced the authoritarian approach of epidemic containment by forcibly shutting down significant segments of or the entire country, although at varying degrees.

By early April, about 3.9 billion people or half of the world’s population were under home quarantine (house arrests?)!
Figure 2

Hence, the Wile E. Coyote moment wasn’t limited to China; it became a worldwide phenomenon!

As such, in the 1Q, the Eurozone’s GDP shrank 3.8%, its fastest rate on record, while the US GDP reported a 4.8% decrease, its steepest contraction since 2008!

Bloomberg estimates that the Global GDP in April plunged by 4.8%!

But there is more behind the headline numbers.

We Live in Interesting Times! Negative Oil Prices and Worst US Job Losses Since the Great Depression

Things that could not seem to happen—have actually been happening!

And here are just a few of them.
 
Figure 3

With a sharp decline in demand, which came in the face of a dearth of storage space, oil price futures fell to negative in the third week of April! Depressed prices put in peril debt-ridden oil companies and oil-producing nations with untenable welfare systems.

In the US, a record 20.5 million people have lost their jobs last April, sending the unemployment rate to 14.7%, the highest since the Great Depression! Yet, there were 33.5 million people who have filed for unemployment or jobless claims in the last seven weeks!

Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank President Neel Kashkari in a CNBC interview recently said that though the reported unemployment rate could be as high as 17% — a brutal number, no doubt — but he says the true number may be as high as 24%. “It’s devastating.”

April’s job losses have virtually erased job gains of the last two decades! That’s Nassim Taleb’s Turkey Principle in action!

The US private sector employment-to-population, a measure of the number of people employed against the total working-age population (Investopedia), crashed to a harrowing 51.3% last April, the worst since, again, the Great Depression!


Again, that’s only a piecemeal of the overall picture.

And because the great Wile E. Coyote moment has only scratched the surface, governments around the world backed by their respective central banks launched a series of unprecedented measures to bailout both their financial systems and the economies.

The Unseen Consequences from the Uncharted Global Fiscal and Monetary Bailout! Depression Ahead?
Figure 4

Governments around the world have collectively unleashed at least USD 8 trillion worth of subsidies to cushion the impact from the economic shutdown caused by both COVID-19 and the political response to contain its spread. Bank of America’s Michael Hartnett estimates that fiscal spending support has reached $16.4 trillion, about 19% of the 2019’s USD 86 trillion Global GDP!

With depressed economies, spending at this scale translates to massive fiscal deficits, which will require extraordinary amounts of borrowings and or support from the central banks.

And as a result, in 2020, 107 rate cuts have been imposed by about 78 central banks as of May 8th.

And to ensure liquidity, global central banks have engaged in balance sheet expansion by financing their respective governments through asset purchases.

Since surging fiscal deficits signify a global phenomenon, debts and central bank assets have exploded.

Despite the Trump government’s unleashing an accrued $2.4 trillion of spending support for the main street, backed by about $ 2.41 trillion of asset purchases by the US Federal Reserve, which has been faster than the Great Recession or the Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2007 to 2008, the yield of US 2-year Treasury note dropped to a RECORD low, while Fed Fund rate futures turned NEGATIVE before bouncing above zero late last week! The Fed’s balance sheet has soared to a milestone USD 6.712 trillion and has been expected to rocket to $10 trillion by early next year!

The details of the USD 2.4 trillion spending stimulus and the various support programs bankrolled by the US Federal Government can be found here and here.

And rumors of the second phase of support from the Federal Government have been afloat due to the recent job numbers.

Yet the carrying costs of the subsidies from the Great Recession or Financial Crisis of 2007-2008 has been immense. It lowered the trajectory of the rate of economic growth, increased dependency towards leveraging or debt for financing, redirected financial activities from the economy towards debt financed asset speculation, thereby, fueling asset market bubbles, nurtured the rise of zombie firms and industries, which siphoned resources that contributed to maladjustments that decreased economic productivity, promoted the widening of inequality, and entrenched economic structural imbalances, where central bank emergency policies became the norm that ultimately increased systemic global financial and economic fragility. 

Thus, COVID-19 fundamentally exposed such embedded vulnerabilities!

And here is the thing, the US signified the epicenter of the Great Recession or Financial Crisis of 2007 to 2008 (GFC) that spread to the world.  Hence, using domestic policies and international cooperation, much of the world was able to erect defenses against the contamination.

But this time is different.

In 2020, the IMF expects about 170 nations or 90% of its 189 members to register negative per capita income growth! Over 100 countries have approached the IMF for emergency financing. Though the IMF brags that it has USD 1 trillion in lending capacity, the irony is, some of the sources of financing may be from countries that are presently in need of it!

While access to bridge financing for countries undergoing economic stress had been made available from bilateral or multilateral sources during the GFC, that’s unlikely the case today.

Moreover, today's bailouts will be like funding deadbeats, where a financial blackhole exists to continually drain resources. For instance, Argentina received a rescue package from the worth $57 billion in 2018, the biggest loan from the IMF ever. Today, or less than two years from the rescue, Argentina is on the brink of its ninth default!

Furthermore, while it took over 10-years to expose the embedded costs from bailout policies of the GFC, the imbalances built from the present simultaneous fiscal and monetary support will extrapolate to the acceleration of capital consumption.

Besides, the economic shutdown has seriously impaired the availability of capital and capital goods in the global economy!

Yet to surface and be accounted for are the second-, third- and nth order from the current ambit of socio-economic and political events, which means, the current crisis is at its incipient phase!

A prolonged recession could morph into a Depression!

The Bernanke Doctrine in Motion!
Figure 5

And imbalances?

Since the GFC, US Federal Reserve policies have greatly influenced the direction of the US stock market. In a single month, the Fed’s USD 2.4 trillion asset expansion has encapsulated such rescues!

The financial markets have been 'totally' detached from the economy, the Mainstreet, or from “fundamentals”.

Mr. Ben Bernanke penned the below, even as a professor in 2000, or before to his entry to the US central bank. He would eventually assume the highest post as Fed Reserve Chairman from 2006 to 2014:

There’s no denying that a collapse in stock prices today would pose serious macroeconomic challenges for the United States. Consumer spending would slow, and the U.S. economy would become less of a magnet for foreign investors. Economic growth, which in any case has recently been at unsustainable levels, would decline somewhat. History proves, however, that a smart central bank can protect the economy and the financial sector from the nastier side effects of a stock market collapse.

Central bank policies today continue to hallmark the Bernanke Doctrine and throw gasoline to the fire!

And because of this, millions of people have been hurt, and more are to suffer. This policy-induced pain represents its consequence, a somber reality of the business cycle.

Sunday, February 16, 2020

Batten Down the Hatches! Global Recession Ahead: The New Coronavirus Pushes China’s Economy to a Freefall!


Beware of Wall Street’s Armchair Epidemiologists -@wsj (Wall Street Journal) It is still possible that coronavirus will follow the pattern of SARS and be contained quickly, but less than 5% chance on that. More likely, it could become a pandemic -@mlipsitch (Marc Lipsitch) –COVID19 @V2019N

In this issue

Batten Down the Hatches! Global Recession Ahead: The New Coronavirus Pushes China’s Economy to a Freefall!
-The Medical Field Has Yet to Grasp Fully the COVID19 Virus
-The 760 Million People Quarantine or the Health Gulag Difference!
-The Willy E. Coyote Moment: China’s Economic Freefall!
-The Vaccine Elixir? Global Recession Ahead, Batten Down the Hatches!

Batten Down the Hatches! Global Recession Ahead: The New Coronavirus Pushes China’s Economy to a Freefall!

The Medical Field Has Yet to Grasp Fully the COVID19 Virus

It is best to understand that the basic reason for the coronavirus is called an epidemic (eventually, a pandemic) is that a lot of unknown factors are involved in its evolution. And because of this, its multiplier infection and fatality rates have yet to be determined.  (bold and underline in articles are mine)

From CNN (February 14): As an outbreak of a novel coronavirus has swept through Hubei province, China, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been preparing for its worst case scenario -- a widespread outbreak of illnesses in the United States. "Right now we're in an aggressive containment mode," CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield told CNN's Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta in an interview on Thursday. "We don't know a lot about this virus," he said. "This virus is probably with us beyond this season, beyond this year, and I think eventually the virus will find a foothold and we will get community-based transmission."

From the International Business Times Singapore (February 14): The COVID-19 coronavirus has spread drastically in the past few weeks. Hong Kong's leading epidemiologist believes that the virus could infect around 60 percent of the world population. The warning came after the World Health Organisation said that the recent cases of patients who had not visited China were the tip of the iceberg. According to an article published by a prominent news platform, Prof Gabriel Leung the chair of public health medicine at Hong Kong University said that the main question was to figure out the size and shape of the iceberg. Another scientist Ira Longini a World Health Organization adviser who tracked studies of the virus's transmissibility in China said that the virus might get transmitted enough to affect two-thirds of the population which could be in billions. Longini said that the virus spread before the effective quarantine was in place.

From Reuters (February 12): China's coronavirus epidemic may peak in February and then plateau before easing, the government's top medical adviser on the outbreak said. In an exclusive interview with Reuters, Zhong Nanshan, a leading epidemiologist who won international fame for his role in combating the SARS epidemic in 2003, said the situation in some provinces was already improving, with the number of new cases declining.

From the Reuters (February 12): The coronavirus epidemic may be peaking in China where it was first detected in the central city of Wuhan but it is just beginning in the rest of the world and likely to spread, a global expert on infectious diseases said on Wednesday. The Chinese government’s senior medical adviser has said the disease is hitting a peak in China and may be over by April. He said he was basing the forecast on mathematical modelling, recent events and government action. Dale Fisher, chair of the Global Outbreak Alert & Response Network that is coordinated by the World Health Organization, said that predicted “time course” may well be true if the virus is allowed to run free in Wuhan. “It’s fair to say that’s really what we are seeing,” he told Reuters in an interview. “But it has spread to other places where it’s the beginning of the outbreak. In Singapore, we are at the beginning of the outbreak.”

In an interview with the Harvard Gazette, Marc Lipsitch professor of epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and head of the school’s Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics said, “We know that the spread is even greater than it was then. It was likely then that it would spread more widely, but there was still hope for containment. I think now that it’s in more countries — even Singapore, which is really good at tracing cases, has found some cases that aren’t linked to previous known cases — it’s clear that there are probably many cases in countries where we haven’t yet found them. This is really a global problem that’s not going to go away in a week or two….Unfortunately, I think it’s more likely to be that it’s gathering steam. We’ve released a preprint that we’ve been discussing publicly — and trying to get peer reviewed in the meantime — that looks at the numbers internationally, based on how many cases you would expect from normal travel volumes. And a couple of things are striking. One is that there are countries that really should be finding cases and haven’t yet, like Indonesia and maybe Cambodia. They are outside the range of uncertainty you would expect even given variability between countries. So our best guess is that there are undetected cases in those countries. Indonesia said a couple of days ago that it had done 50 tests, but it has a lot of air travel with Wuhan, let alone the rest of China. So 50 tests is not enough to be confident you’re catching all the cases. That’s one bit of evidence that to me was really striking. Second, I was reading The Wall Street Journal that Singapore had three cases so far that were not traced to any other case. Singapore is the opposite of Indonesia, in that they have more cases than you would expect based on their travel volume, probably because they’re better at detection. And even they are finding cases that they don’t have a source for. That makes me think that many other places do as well. Of course, we’re making guesses from limited information, but I think they’re pretty likely to be correct guesses, given the totality of information.”

And because of its complexity, different opinions have been voiced by experts.

Aside from complexity, issues related to government responses, transmission channels (e.g. airborne or not?), detectability, availability of applicable testing kits, medical supplies and workers, quarantine centers, the number and the quality of public health centers, the monitoring, surveillance and control measures, the accuracy of disclosed cases, transparency of information, public awareness and precautionary measures, as well as, compliance with medical treatments, and many more, have influenced the rate and scale of dispersion of the coronavirus.

COVID-19 is the moniker provided by the World Health Organization to the coronavirus last week.

The 760 Million People Quarantine or the Health Gulag Difference!

Meanwhile, to rationalize a sanguine outcome, economic and financial spinmeisters continue to project short-term impacts from it, disregarding the unintended consequences from recent policy measures and the multiplicative rates of the disease.

In their campaign to contain or eradicate COVID-19, the Chinese government have recently locked down over 80 cities! Beijing, Shanghai, and Chongqing, according to the Taiwan News, had likewise been placed under “closed-off management” on the 10th of February.

And in its escalation, “wartime management” orders, also imposed last week, barred people from leaving their homes or apartments in the 2 districts of Hubei, according to BingePost.com.

Even the western mainstream media have now seen it.

From the New York Times (February 15): Residential lockdowns of varying strictness — from checkpoints at building entrances to hard limits on going outdoors — now cover at least 760 million people in China, or more than half the country’s population, according to a New York Times analysis of government announcements in provinces and major cities. Many of these people live far from the city of Wuhan, where the virus was first reported and which the government sealed off last month. Throughout China, neighborhoods and localities have issued their own rules about residents’ comings and goings, which means the total number of affected people may be even higher. Policies vary widely, leaving some places in a virtual freeze and others with few strictures. China’s top leader, Xi Jinping, has called for an all-out “people’s war” to tame the outbreak. But the restrictions have prevented workers from returning to factories and businesses, straining China’s giant economy. And with local officials exercising such direct authority over people’s movements, it is no surprise that some have taken enforcement to extremes.”

In perspective, 760 million is close to 10% of the global population!

By the way, Vietnam joined China’s bandwagon last week. From UK’s DailyMail (February 13): A series of villages in Vietnam were put under quarantine today after six cases of the deadly coronavirus were discovered there.  The lockdown of 10,000 people is the first major quarantine outside mainland China since the outbreak began.   Police officers in face masks were today guarding checkpoints in the farming region of Son Loi with villagers facing 20 days in quarantine. 

With such a draconian approach to combat an epidemic/pandemic, which essentially freezes social and commercial activities of a significant segment of their population, what relevant precedence has there been? Where?

In the COVID-19 case, this time is different!

The Willy E. Coyote Moment: China’s Economic Freefall!
 
Figure 1: The Willy E Coyote Moment (source)

As noted last week, in a survey, entrepreneurs comprising the small and medium scale industries expressed extreme pessimism.


News anecdotes appear to confirm such despondency, as a wave of closures whacked both the restaurant and hotel industry!

From Reuters (February 14): “A report published this week by China Cuisine Association said scare over the epidemic has cost the catering sector 500 billion yuan in lost earnings during the week-long Lunar New Year holiday, with 93% restaurants shutting down operations. Other restaurateurs have also publicly spoken of the pain they’re facing. Jia Guolong, chairman and founder of a leading restaurant chain Xibei, told Chinese media last week he could only cover the cost of running his chain of more than 400 restaurants for three more months.”

From Global Times (February 13): As epidemic control and prevention efforts are ongoing, the hotel closure rate nationwide is more than 80 percent. The occupancy rates of most open hotels are just over 10 percent, an industry insider said. As the impact of the outbreak has intensified, more than a dozen overseas airlines have suspended some Chinese routes or reduced their flight schedules. Tourists have also canceled travel plans during and after the Chinese New Year holidays, making it difficult for international hotel groups in China to maintain daily business operations

Incredible!

And not limited to the restaurant, China’s economic meltdown in pictures…
Figure 2
Construction steel demand plunged 88% while theater box off receipts had been near zero, according to Goldman Sachs.
Figure 3
Daily Passenger traffic plunged in the third week of January, while passenger traffic during the Lunar New Year crashed. (data from capital economics) 
Figure 4

Meanwhile, China’s coal consumption and property sales also dived!

Que Horror!

China auto sales reportedly plunged 18% last January, according to the CNN.

And with businesses starved of liquidity, the initial reaction has been the scramble for cash through bank loans. From Reuters (February 10): More than 300 Chinese firms including Meituan Dianping (3690.HK), China’s largest food delivery company, and smartphone maker Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) are seeking bank loans totaling at least 57.4 billion yuan ($8.2 billion) to soften the impact of the coronavirus, two banking sources said. The firms, including China’s dominant ride hailing service provider, Didi Chuxing Technology Co, Megvii Technology Inc and Qihoo 360 Technology Co, were either involved in the control of the epidemic or had been hardest hit, the sources told Reuters on Monday.

Banks provided some 537 billion yuan (about USD 76.89 billion) as of Friday (14th), according to the state owned Global Times.

Because the second-largest economy has become dependent on global chains, dislocations on domestic enterprises have percolated abroad.

As I have noted two weeks back, “Because the war on people translates to the disruption to the global division of labor, shocks to the demand and supply chains will occur.”


From Bloomberg (February 11): Global supply chains look to be suffering longer-than-expected disruptions tied to coronavirus as China’s government tries to nudge idled factories back to work to limit the damage to the world’s second-largest economy. To contain the crisis, Chinese authorities have ordered city lockdowns and extended holidays but the human impact is unrelenting, with deaths topping 1,000. The economic fallout could extend well into March with rising numbers of bankruptcies, increasing layoffs and worsening demand, according to economists at Nomura.

From the pharmaceutical industries of the US and India to Asian and European auto production plants and even to New Zealand’s SMEs have reportedly been severely affected!

Most importantly, the incipient signs of breakdowns in international trade and finance.

From Reuters (February 11): As the coronavirus outbreak in China shows no signs of abating any time soon, some companies that buy and sell goods in the Chinese market are considering the legal defense of force majeure. Force majeure refers to unexpected external circumstances that prevent a party to a contract from meeting their obligations. The underlying event must be unforeseeable and not the result of actions undertaken by the party invoking force majeure. Natural disasters, strikes, and terrorist attacks can all be force majeure events. Declaring force majeure may allow a party to a contract to avoid liability for nonperformance.”

And here is the thing, with the use of force majeure, an avalanche of lawsuits could be impending! Will a string of defaults follow too?!

Truly stunning developments!

Yet, these are accounts from those directly hit. The impact on the secondary, third, to the nth chain should be next.

How can one even put growth numbers to them???

The Vaccine Elixir? Global Recession Ahead, Batten Down the Hatches!

Of course, the imminence of a swift discovery of a vaccine, as media has been bombarding the public, should supposedly halt the advance of the COVID-19.

Though I share that hope, the reality is that vaccines of its forebears MERS and SARS have yet to be made available.

“SARS happened in 2003, and we don’t have a SARS vaccine. MERS happened in 2013, and we don’t have a MERS vaccine” said Laurie Garrett, Recipient of Pulitzer Prize, Polk and Peabody Awards and former Sr. Fellow of @CFR.org, in a recent interview. As such, Ms. Garrett also inferred that “it’s highly unlikely that a vaccine for #COVID19 will be developed soon”, according to The Epoch Times.

Circling back to the Harvard Gazette’s interview of Marc Lipsitch on vaccines:

GAZETTE: People have said a vaccine is probably at least a year away. Do you have a sense that this is going to need a vaccine to finally bring it under control?

LIPSITCH: That seems like the scenario which is most plausible to me right now. Vaccine efforts are very much needed, but I think we should be clear that they won’t necessarily succeed. There’s a lot of effort being put into them, but not every disease has a vaccine. [Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization, said Tuesday that a vaccine could be ready in 18 months, according to CNN.]

And even should a “working” vaccine be discovered soon, a world floating in shocking leverage of 322% of estimated GDP, or $255 trillion in debt as of the 3Q of 2019, according to the Institute of International Finance, would be seismically shaken, if not violently disrupted by the ripples from the Xi government’s response to the COVID-19.

With Japan and the Eurozone at the brink of recession, while others post a meaningful decline in growth rates (as India, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, South Korea, Mexico and more), China’s battle with COVID-19 must likely serve as a trigger or a tipping point for a global economic convulsion!

Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Macau have announced forthcoming fiscal bailouts!

Aside from fiscal measures, will massive liquidity injections by global central banks, plug real economy dislocations, also help save the day?

Can monetary inflation offset the coming wave of layoffs, losses, bankruptcies, closures, and then defaults? Do banks and financial institutions have sufficient wherewithal or capital to serve as a firewall against the latter? We are about to see.

Bloomberg’s Lisa Abramowicz quoted Guggenheim's Scott Minerd apt remark:

 “Investors are realizing this virus scare is yet another piece of evidence about how fragile global economic growth is. It’s completely a guess about what the impact of the virus will be.”

Batten down the hatches, folks!