Showing posts with label fiscal deficits. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fiscal deficits. Show all posts

Sunday, May 26, 2024

The USD-Philippine Peso Surges to 18-Month High: BSP Blames 'Speculators' as GIR Composition Exhibits Intervention Limits

 

Bretton Woods II served up a deflationary impulse (globalization, open trade, just-in-time supply chains, and only one supply chain [Foxconn], not many), and Bretton Woods III will serve up an inflationary impulse (de-globalization, autarky, just-in-case hoarding of commodities and duplication of supply chains, and more military spending to be able to protect whatever seaborne trade is left— Zoltan Pozsar

The USD-Philippine Peso Surges to 18-Month High: BSP Blames 'Speculators' as GIR Composition Exhibits Intervention Limits

In this issue

I. The Strong US Dollar and the Weak Philippine Peso

II. As USD/Philippine Peso Surged to 18-Month High, BSP Warns Against "Speculation"

III. The BSP’s Shift to a “Dovish" Stance; The USDPHP’s Lindy Effect

IV. Why the BSP’s Dovish Shift: Weakening GDP and Surging Interest Payments on Public Debt

V. USDPHP’s Bull Market Based on Inflationary Financing of Deficit Spending

VI. Soaring External Debt Means Surging USD "Shorts"

VII. The Philippine Peso to Benefit from a USD "Collapse?" BSP’s Assets Reveals a Different Story

VIII. The Composition of the BSP’s Gross International Reserves Exposes the Limits of the BSP’s Potential Interventions

IX. Will a Weak Peso Boost Exports While Hampering Imports?

X. The BSP Points to "Market Failure" by Shifting the Blame on "Speculators"

XI. USD Philippine Peso Signals Higher Inflation Risks, The Probable Shift to a Multipolar Currency System

The USD-Philippine Peso Surges to 18-Month High: BSP Blames 'Speculators' as GIR Composition Exhibits Intervention Limits 

As the USD Philippine peso soared to an 18-month high, the BSP points blamed "speculators" for the surge. However, this finger-pointing constitutes a smoke-screen.

I. The Strong US Dollar and the Weak Philippine Peso

Figure 1 

The US dollar index ($DXY) rose by 0.26% this week. The USD increased against most Asian currencies, with the exception of the Indian rupee ($INR), which fell by 0.29%. The INR benefited from inflows into its manic stock markets, a record $25 billion central bank payout to the government, and an all-time high in international reserves (as of May 17). (Figure 1, top and middle windows)

For the week, the USD surged the most against the Thai baht ($THB) by 1.6%, the South Korean won ($KRW) by 1.05%, and the Philippine peso ($PHP) by 0.99%.

Despite a massive $58 billion support and repeated threats to intervene by the Bank of Japan (BoJ), the Japanese yen fell by 0.9% week-on-week (WoW), with $USDJPY approaching 157, just slightly below 158, which represented a 34-year high reached at the end of April 2024.

Year to date, down by 5%, the PHP signified the region’s fifth weakest currency after the JPY (11.3%), THB (7.2%), KRW (6.1%), and the Vietnamese dong ($VND, 5.7%). 

II. As USD/Philippine Peso Surged to 18-Month High, BSP Warns Against "Speculation "

 The USDPHP reached Php 58.27, an 18-month high, on May 21st. 

Echoing the BoJ, the Philippine BSP chief implicitly chided speculators: The dollar continued to strengthen as the Federal Reserve signaled delay in cutting interest rates. The BSP continues to monitor the foreign exchange market but allows the market to function without aiming to protect a certain exchange rate. Nonetheless, the BSP will participate in the market when necessary to smoothen excessive volatility and restore order during periods of stress. (Businessworld, 2024)

In contrast to the BSP declaration, out of the 28 USD crosses, 13 were positive, and the USDPHP outperformed that day, according to Exante Data.

Further, while the BSP’s "plausible deniability" did not mention interventions, two days later, newswires reported that the monetary authority did support the peso: Mr. Remolona said that the central bank intervened by small amounts on Tuesday, when the peso sank to the P58 level for the first time in over 18 months or since Nov. 10, 2022. (Businessworld, 2024)

Even more, news also indicated that even before last week’s USDPHP’s November 22 high, the BSP had already been carrying out operations in support of the peso as early as May 7.

The BSP has been warning speculators since last April, or in June 2022, when the USDPHP was at 54.8!

Media suggests that the BSP’s shift from "hawkish" to "dovish" sentiment could have been the factor, yet the BSP remains adamant: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Governor Eli Remolona Jr. remains unfazed by the hawkish signals from the US Federal Reserve, saying the BSP’s monetary policy decisions will be guided primarily by the Philippines’ own economic data rather than the Fed’s moves. (Inquirer, 2024)

III. The BSP’s Shift to a “Dovish" Stance; The USDPHP’s Lindy Effect

The BSP’s predilection in easing policy rates regardless of the US Federal Reserve’s stance is an exposition—it suggests that the Fed was a convenient pretext to justify the current monetary stance of local authorities. The BSP would readily abandon it when politics so determined.

To boost the economy, the BSP chief proposes to cut rates by 50 bps in the second half of 2024, possibly starting this August.

Nonetheless, typical of central banks, markets supposedly function as the culprits for any economic maladjustments—and not policymakers. They assume the role of Gandalf the Grey/White (in the Lord of the Rings series), setting boundaries against the adversary. 

In the Fellowship of the Ring, Gandalf commanded the demon Balrog against crossing the Bridge of Khazad-dûm, 'You shall not pass!' At least, Gandalf emerged victorious in his battle against the Balrog. 

On the other hand, the USDPHP could be considered a trend with Lindy characteristics. The Lindy effect is the "idea that the older something is, the longer it's likely to be around in the future" (Waschenfelder, 2021). In a word: time-bounded resilience. (Figure 1, lower image) 

Since gaining independence from the US, the Philippine peso has been pegged to the USD at Php 2. However, the defunct Central Bank of the Philippines (CBP) experimented with currency decontrols and reestablishment of controls until its dissolution and the establishment of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) in July 1993, which then adopted a managed float system (Wikipedia). 

In any case, from the CBP to the BSP, the USDPHP has remained on a 54-year uptrend, with periodic countercyclical movements. 

It's also no coincidence that the emergence of the USDPHP bull market has coincided with 'the Nixon Shock' in August 1971, which marked the end of the Bretton Woods system (dollar fixed to gold but gold was allowed only for international exchange—WGC) or the transition to the incumbent US dollar standard, the primary currency reserve for the global economy (CFR, 2023).

The thing is, the drivers of the USDPHP bull market from the past remain principal factors today, or even worse—meaning they should reinforce its bull market

IV. Why the BSP’s Dovish Shift: Weakening GDP and Surging Interest Payments on Public Debt 

Why would the BSP insist on cutting rates ahead of the Fed? 

First and foremost, the BSP may be aware that the GDP represents a mirage—it is weaker than advertised. This notion has been supported by the Q1 2024 financial performance of the PSEi 30. 

Naturally, with firms heavily reliant on credit, higher rates pose risks to both the GDP and the banking system. 

Secondly, and more importantly, public debt repayments and refinancing have been skyrocketing. 

Figure 2

Four-month public debt servicing soared by 49% to a historic Php 1.15 trillion, bolstered by interest payments (38.4%) and amortizations (52.4%). Though 82% of it accounted for local currency-denominated liabilities, it was lower than last year’s 84.9%, which means foreign obligations filled the rest. (Figure 2, topmost graph)

The four-month carrying cost of published public debt was just 28.3% off the annual or last year’s all-time high! "Higher for longer" translates to even more debt repayments and refinancing on the back of higher repricing. (Figure 2, second to the highest graph)

Though the mainstream rejoiced at April’s fiscal surplus, brought about by the record revenues of Php 537 billion as a result of the annual tax filing, non-tax revenues, which comprised 41.6% of the total, delivered the substance. 

Non-tax revenues more than doubled (114%) while BIR revenues grew 12.7%. For most years, surpluses signified a seasonal feature of April—again in response to the annual tax filing.

And yet, public spending surged 32.3% to Php 494.5 billion.

In a nutshell, due to non-tax revenues—partly from dividends of Government-Owned and Controlled Corporations and "one-off remittance of disposition proceeds from the Bases Conversion Development Authority (BCDA)"—deficit spending was moderated.

Ironically, despite this, the cumulative four-month fiscal deficit swelled by 12.7% year-over-year—the third-largest—as the Bureau of Treasury drew from its cash reserves (-20.4%) and reduced its borrowing (-23%). The drain of liquidity likely means a tsunami of borrowings going into the year-end. (Figure 2, second to the lowest chart)

Figure 3

And yet, the USDPHP has tracked the uptrend in public spending, and subsequently, the fiscal deficit. (Figure 2, lowest chart and Figure 3, topmost graph)

V. USDPHP’s Bull Market Based on Inflationary Financing of Deficit Spending

Naturally, deficit spending requires financing. How? 

Aside from taxes, the government draws from the public’s savings. Therefore, the uptrend in USDPHP also reflects the "unstoppable" bull market in public debt. (Figure 3, second to the highest image)

Due to the insufficiency of public savings, financial authorities have resorted to the "monetization " of public liabilities.  

The acceleration of the USDPHP also echoes the rise of the BSP’s net claims on the central government (NCoCG). (Figure 3, second to the lowest graph) 

For possible public relations (PR) goals, monetary authorities limit the expansion of their balance sheets. Instead, they rely on the banking and financial system to implement their objectives. 

Consequently, the USDPHP likewise manifests the inflationary credit expansion of the banking system through the monetization of public liabilities. All-time highs in bank holdings of NCoCG should eventually impact the USDPHP. (Figure 3, lowest window) 

Additionally, record bank holdings of NCoCG have also aligned with their historic Held-to-Maturity (HTM) assets, which escalates the siphoning off of liquidity in the system.

VI. Soaring External Debt Means Surging USD "Shorts " 

Hold it, because there’s more.

The government has borrowed not only to fulfill the FX requirements of the economy but also to meet the BSP’s balance sheet target.

Figure 4

Though financial authorities have relied on domestic borrowings to bridge their financial chasm, external borrowings have also been accelerating. In Q4 2023, it grew by 12.4% to a record USD 125.4 billion. (Figure 4, topmost chart) 

Historic fiscal deficits have reflected the surge in external debt. (Figure 4, second to the highest graph) 

The public sector, with a 58% share as of December 2023, has accounted for a vast majority of the total. (Figure 4, lowest window) 

Since external borrowing has grown faster than the published Gross International Reserves (GIR), the debt stock has now surpassed the purported reserves. That being said, do these appear to be 'ample reserves' to defend the peso? (Figure 4, second to the lowest image) 

Furthermore, the intensified increases in external debt have also contributed to USD "shorts."

Figure 5

While the government can inflate away its domestic debt, paid for by the loss of purchasing power of the citizenry, this would magnify the real value of FX debt—or require more pesos to finance FX operations. (Figure 5, topmost visual) 

So why shouldn’t the USDPHP be higher?

VII. The Philippine Peso to Benefit from a USD "Collapse?" BSP’s Assets Reveals a Different Story

The grapevine suggests that the Philippine peso could benefit from weakness or even a "collapse" in the US dollar.  

However, the facts tell a different story.

Presently, the world operates under a de facto US dollar standard, where US dollar reserves serve as an anchor for domestic currency and monetary operations. 

As a share of its balance sheet, the BSP have built its international reserve holdings from 31% in 1993 to 85% in 2010.  (Figure 5, second to the highest pane) 

The BSP have maintained its FX holdings in a tight range of 85% to 87% until 2019.  The BSP's local monetary operations have been closely tied to these reserves. This reliance has led to a rising share of currency issuance compared to liabilities. (Figure 5, second to the lowest graph) 

The buildup of FX reserves fueled a 9-year countercyclical rebound (2004-2012) in the Philippine peso. It hallmarked the "salad days" for the Philippine peso. 

This period also witnessed a reduction in the share of currency issuance, representing an implicit cleanup of both government and private sector balance sheets. 

However, this changed following the Great Recession in 2007-2008, when the BSP, like its global peers, lowered rates to stimulate credit expansion and mitigate economic weaknesses. This marked the beginning of the era of easy money.

Fast forward to the present, a massive injection into the financial system amounting to Php 2.2 trillion, or about 11% of the GDP, signaled an emergency monetary response to the pandemic crisis. 

This significantly inflationary operation resulted in a substantial decline in FX reserves, indicating that the government has been printing more money than its FX anchor permits. 

Given these factors, why shouldn't the USDPHP rise? 

VIII. The Composition of the BSP’s Gross International Reserves Exposes the Limits of the BSP’s Potential Interventions

Through a gradual buildup of net foreign assets, the BSP has been attempting to restore its previous range of FX reserves. However, the growth rates of BSP's GIR and banks' FX assets have been slowing significantly. In contrast, the BSP's net foreign assets continue to expand.

Figure 6

The BSP has been relying less on its FX holdings for its GIR operations, as evidenced by the declining trend. (Figure 6, topmost graph)

Since 2018, the BSP has modernized, utilizing Other Reserve Assets (ORA) such as swaps, repos, and other short-term loans to boost its reserves. From a peak of 12.5% in January 2023, ORA accounted for 5.3% of the GIR as of March. (Figure 6, second to the highest window)

Interestingly, despite record gold prices, the BSP has been selling off its gold reserves, leading to a decrease in physical metal holdings. (Figure 6, second to the lowest chart)

However, thanks to record USD gold prices, this has bolstered the headline value of the GIR.

In short, the headline GIR conceals its actual state through the use of 'borrowed reserves.' 

Even with borrowed reserves, the rising USDPHP has stalled GIR growth. (Figure 6, lowest image)

Figure 7 

In other words, through the expansion of borrowed reserves in the composition of the GIR, BSP operations ultimately depend on loose financial conditions abroad. 

Nevertheless, a tightening of access to local and foreign FX flows will limit the BSP’s capacity to intervene, as evidenced by the growth strains in the GIR relative to the USDPHP. (Figure 7, topmost graph) 

So why shouldn’t the USDPHP rise?

Furthermore, signaling a divergence between a 'genuinely hawkish' Fed and a 'dovish' BSP could lead to a wider yield spread favoring US Treasuries over domestic counterparts, similar to Q4 2020 through Q2 2021, when the USDPHP rose fastest. (Figure 7, second to the highest graph) 

So why shouldn’t the USDPHP rise? 

Here's the thing: The BSP has benefited from the rise of the USD, which has led to revaluation gains from its USD asset holdings. This is evident in its increased reliance on 'investments' while reducing its gold and FX holdings. 

Unfortunately, we don’t have data on the distribution share of the GIR or the BSP’s FX portfolio.

However, with the BSP’s FX reserves accounting for over 70% of its assets, how would a USD "collapse" favor the PHP?

To elaborate, with the BSP’s net worth and capital accounting for only 1.9% and 0.8% of its December 2023 assets, wouldn’t a substantial markdown in its USD portfolio render the BSP insolvent? So, what would the BSP do, print more?

As noted in 2021, (bold original) 

The BSP must amass sufficient FX reserves to match domestic monetary operations required to maintain the de facto US currency reserve standard. Otherwise, with inadequate FX anchor, the peso must fall.  (Prudent Investor, 2021) 

In both cases, why shouldn’t the USDPHP rise? 

All this is owed to the Keynesian policies of 'build and they will come,' predicated on 'spending drives the economy,' which has led to a record shortfall in savings and increased reliance on debt (local and foreign) to fill the funding gap

How is this supposed to represent "sound" macroeconomics? 

Why shouldn’t the USDPHP rise? 

IX. Will a Weak Peso Boost Exports While Hampering Imports? 

We are further told by the echo chamber that there is a bright side to the weak peso. 

Or they have been quick to rationalize: a weaker peso would boost export competitiveness and hinder imports. 

Really? 

Data from the Philippine Statistics Authority says otherwise. 

Firstly, from 2013 to the end of 2023, imports have risen alongside the increase in the USDPHP. (Figure 7, second to the lowest image)

Why? Simply put, due to the inadequacy of local production and the political preference to prioritize household consumption—evidenced by the record savings-investment gap. Additionally, interventionist and inflationary policies reduce competitiveness

Under such conditions, the bull market in the USDPHP has not hindered import growth. Weak imports in the face of a rising USDPHP have only begun to surface in 2024.

Moreover, while the overall trend in goods exports mirrors the rise of the USDPHP, increasing USDPHP have not necessarily translated to a surge in exports. (Figure 7, lowest chart)

Using reductio ad absurdum, if weak currencies were to deliver an export utopia, why not accelerate the devaluation? Better yet, why not embrace hyperinflation or the utter destruction of the Philippine peso?

The reality is that none of the countries that experienced the worst episodes of hyperinflation—such as Hungary, Yugoslavia, Zimbabwe, Republika Srpska, and others—became export giants during the devastation of their respective currencies. 

The essence is that heuristics do not equate to economics.

Certainly, the weak peso, primarily a result of domestic policies, will have redistribution effects on the economy, and some sectors or enterprises may benefit from it. However, the overall impact is a decline in the standard of living for the general public. 

Why is the USDPHP destined to reach new highs?

Briefly, it's due to the accumulation of economic maladjustments resulting from internal policies.

Figure 8 

X. The BSP Points to "Market Failure" by Shifting the Blame on "Speculators" 

The markets or the so-called 'speculators' understand this. Unprecedented leveraging raises manifold risks, including interest, currency, and credit risks. (Figure 8, topmost image)

As previously explained, intensified immersion in domestic debt does not serve as a talisman against the 'demon' represented by a crisis. The ventilation of economic imbalances eventually forces them to surface.

Speculators serve as easy scapegoats for a politicized agency meant to protect redistribution policies favoring the government and the elites. Authorities shift the onus onto the source of the imbalances by pointing to the supposed role of "market failure."

Still, why does the BSP not see the rocketing growth in FX deposits? Are they not speculators too? (Figure 8, middle chart) 

Since the penetration levels of the banking system remain far from the levels desired by the establishment, could this buildup in FX deposits primarily be about the elites? Will the BSP crack down on them? 

XI. USD Philippine Peso Signals Higher Inflation Risks, The Probable Shift to a Multipolar Currency System 

Unlike in 2018, when falling CPI coincided with a rally in the peso, the BSP’s ONRRP elevated rate has recently paralleled the rise of the USDPHP. (Figure 8, lowest graph)

If anything, the USDPHP tells us that the inflation genie remains lurking around the corner, yet to wave its magical wand—a third, "bigger" wave of the CPI. 

For the USDPHP, whether 'hawkish' or 'dovish' doesn't matter. 

Rather, the BSP’s inclination towards rate cuts is a response to the softening internals of the GDP and the increasing cost of carrying public and private debt, along with other forms of leverage. 

Finally, while we believe that the USD standard is in its twilight phase, this climax doesn’t necessarily translate to an imminent 'collapse' in the USD.

As illustrated by the BSP’s balance sheet, FX assets (mostly in USDs) comprise the majority.

The USD standard entails that central banks hold assets mostly in USDs.

The transition to a "war economy" implies increased socialization through deficit 'wartime' spending—signifying a global shift towards more inflationary policies in support of war and other war-related agendas. 

This also suggests a diminishing contribution from the private sector. 

That said, as the world realigns along hegemonic lines, nearly every nation would likely follow the US in embracing fiscal dominance—in which inflation becomes a feature, not a bug. 

Moreover, the expanding influence of the "war economy" signifies a transition to a "multipolar" world. 

This transition implies involvement in more aspects—social, economic, monetary, financial, technological, informational, environmental, and tourism-related—leading to increased global economic, financial, and social fragmentation, supply chain dislocations, the formation of economic or trading blocs, and more. 

All of these factors extrapolate to reduced economic efficiencies and higher risks. 

The culmination of the USD standard might also signal a transition towards a "multipolar" monetary system, where the architecture of the currency system of the emerging competitor(s) could be anchored on a basket of commodities. 

While the sequence of realignment of alliances has begun, other developments have yet to materialize. 

As the renowned Credit Suisse analyst Zoltan Pozsar has propounded,

We are witnessing the birth of Bretton Woods III – a new world (monetary) order centered around commodity-based currencies in the East that will likely weaken the Eurodollar system and also contribute to inflationary forces in the West. A crisis is unfolding. A crisis of commodities. Commodities are collateral, and collateral is money, and this crisis is about the rising allure of outside money over inside money. Bretton Woods II was built on inside money, and its foundations crumbled a week ago when the G7 seized Russia’s FX reserves… (Pozsar, 2022) 

____

References

Businessworld, BSP seeks to curb forex speculation, May 24,2024 

Businessworld, Peso hits 58:$1 as Fed stays hawkish, May 21, 2024 

Inquirer.net, BSP chief unfazed by U.S. Fed’s hawkish signals, May 23, 204

Thomas Waschenfelder, The Lindy Effect: Finding Signal In Noise, Wealest.com

Wikipedia, Philippine Peso

World Gold Council, The Bretton Woods System

Anshu Siripurapu and Noah Berman, The Dollar: The World’s Reserve Currency, July 19,2023 CFR.org,

Prudent Investor Newsletter, External Debt Growth Accelerates in Q3! Why This Uptrend Will Continue, December 19, 2021

Zoltan Pozsar, Bretton Woods III, Credit Suisse Economics, bullionstar.com March 7, 2022

 

 

Monday, April 15, 2024

Analyzing the Philippines’ February Merchandise Trade: Unveiling the Impact of Statistical Base Effects on a 'Growth' Rebound

 

Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are pliable—Mark Twain

 

In this issue

Analyzing the Philippines’ February Merchandise Trade: Unveiling the Impact of Statistical Base Effects on a 'Growth' Rebound

I. Unveiling the Statistical Mirage Behind Merchandise Trade Growth

II. Export Boom? Semiconductor Up YoY but on a Downslide while Agro-Based and EDP Exports Rebound

III. Import Trends: Capital, Consumer, and Raw Materials Up YoY, Yet in Downtrend—Where Are the Investments?

IV. A Revival of the Domestic Manufacturing Sector?

V. Private Sector S&P PMI Survey Diverge from the PSA; Rising USD Peso Points to Risks of Stagflation

 

Analyzing the Philippines’ February Merchandise Trade: Unveiling the Impact of Statistical Base Effects on a 'Growth' Rebound

 

Government and media pounced on the positive YoY sign on Philippine Merchandise Trade, interpreting it as "growth."  However, filtering noise from signal tell us otherwise.

 

I. Unveiling the Statistical Mirage Behind Merchandise Trade Growth

 

Businessworld, April 12: Preliminary data from the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) showed the country’s trade-in-goods balance — the difference between exports and imports — stood at a $3.65-billion deficit in February, slipping by 6% from the $3.88-billion gap in February last year. Month on month, the trade gap also narrowed from the revised $4.39 billion in January. The trade deficit in February was the smallest in five months or since the $3.55-billion deficit in September last year. Outbound sale of goods expanded for the second straight month by 15.7% annually to $5.91 billion in February. This was faster than the revised 9.1% growth in January and a turnaround from the 18.3% decline in February last year. This was the quickest exports growth in 16 months or since the 20.6% surge in October 2022. Meanwhile, imports rose by 6.3% to $9.55 billion in February, ending two months of decline. This was a turnaround from the revised 6.1% contraction in January and the 11.8% decline in February 2023. Imports growth was also the fastest in 16 months or since 7.7% in October 2022. (italics mine)

 

YoY February exports grew by 15.7%, while imports increased by 6.34%, and total external trade expanded by 9.74%. As a result, the trade deficit improved by 6%.

 

Great news, right?

 

That's if you discount the overall trend.

 

In reality, February's boost was a mirage—a product of the statistical "low" base effect.

Figure 1

 

From a noise versus signal standpoint, February's USD performance only reinforced the downside drift of the nation's trend in external trade. (Figure 1, topmost graph)

 

It is no coincidence that the fall in external trade deficit has resonated with the easing of the fiscal deficit manifesting the "twin deficits."  (Figure 1, middle window)

 

The easing of public spending has reduced the "crowding effect," freeing up more resources for the market economy's use. (Figure 1, lowest chart)

 

Still, despite the imbalances from the structural shift in bank lending operations, the declining import trend demonstrates mounting strains on consumers from inflation.

 

However, both deficits translate to an economy spending more than it produces, thereby requiring borrowing to fund the savings-investment gap.

 

II. Export Boom? Semiconductor Up YoY but on a Downslide while Agro-Based and EDP Exports Rebound

 

Export boom?

Figure 2

 

Though semiconductor exports soared by 31.9% in February, export volume in USD has been down 2.14% MoM. It has been trending down since September 2023/October 2022. (Figure 2, topmost image)

 

The microchip % share of exports accounted for 44.8% in February 2024, slightly lower than 45.5% in January and substantially higher than 39.3% from the same month a year ago.

 

What other sectors grew in volume and in percentage?

 

Agro-based exports jumped 24.1% YoY, accounting for 7.2% of the total share. (Figure 2, middle diagram)

 

Electronic Data Processing exports also vaulted by 23.1% YoY, with a 7.5% share of the total. (Figure 2, lowest graph)

 

Electronic products (which include the semiconductor and EDP sectors) soared by 27%, accounting for 58% share of the total.

 

The thing is, only a handful of sectors benefited from February's export growth.


III. Import Trends: Capital, Consumer, and Raw Materials Up YoY, Yet in Downtrend—Where Are the Investments?

 

How about imports?

 

Last February, capital goods imports fell by only 3.4% YoY, while consumer goods imports grew by 9.2%.

Figure 3
 

But both sectors suffered a plunge in USD volume of 13.6% and 16.3% MoM, and they have shown signs of further weakening (Figure 3, topmost image)

 

So based on capital goods imports, the avalanche of news headlines about the proposed massive investment flows from a peripatetic leadership selling politically related investments to the US and their allies have yet to happen.

 

Still, the government reported that Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows almost "doubled" in January 2024, mainly from a surge of debt flows. Debt flows accounted for 90% of the FDI. Investments, eh?

 

Curiously, despite the wonderful headlines predicated on YoY, the FDI trend in million USD remains southbound. (Figure 3, middle visual)

 

And this bifurcation applies to raw materials imports, which expanded by 11.8%, despite the downtrend since 3Q 2022. Raw material imports serve as a pulse on the manufacturing sector. (Figure 3, lowest chart)

 

IV. A Revival of the Domestic Manufacturing Sector?

 

Yet, authorities tell us that growth in the manufacturing sector has been picking up.

Figure 4

 

First, the sector's bank credit growth more than doubled from 2% in January to 5.9% in February. The sector's bank credit growth has dovetailed the Producers Price Index (PPI) or "measure of change in the prices of products or commodities produced by domestic manufacturers and sold at farm gate prices to wholesale/other consumers in the domestic market." (PSA, Openstat)

 

Will the PPI follow the rebound in bank credit?

 

Second, manufacturing volume and value were up 8.9% and 7.5% in February 2024, even as net sales in volume and value contracted by 0.5% and 1.7%.

 

Generally, producers have been ramping up in production despite slower sales—implying substantial inventory accumulation.

 

V. Private Sector S&P PMI Survey Diverge from the PSA; Rising USD Peso Points to Risks of Stagflation

 


Figure 5

 

But, the S&P PMI survey for March diverged from the PSA:

 

The latest PMI® data by S&P Global indicated only a modest improvement in the health of the Filipino manufacturing sector during March. Though the pace of expansion was largely sustained from the previous survey period, growth in new orders remained historically subdued. Furthermore, production lapsed back into contraction for the first time since July 2022 amid material shortages. Companies raised their employment and buying activity at stronger rates and renewed their efforts to replenish inventories. That said, the degree of confidence in the outlook for output over the coming year dropped to a near four-year low. In terms of prices, the rate of input cost inflation softened to the weakest since October 2020. Additionally, charges levied for Filipino manufactured goods fell for the first time in nearly four years. (SPI Global, April 2024)

 

Both indicators shared the replenishment of inventories and the account of disinflation via the PPI, but instead of output growth, the SPI indicated a production lapse.

 

The Philippine PMI appears to have been plagued by a "rounding top." (Figure 5, topmost image)

 

In summary, government data points to an upturn in the manufacturing sector in the GDP, which diverges from the SPI’s outlook.

 

Dialing back to imports, only one major category registered increases in both YoY and MoM volume: fuel imports, which were up by 8.3% YoY and 28.4% MoM, driven by rising oil prices. (Figure 5, middle chart)

 

As noted above, due to the "low" base of 2023, government data recorded growth—a chimera.

 

However, the general trend for merchandise trade exhibits ongoing weakness in capital goods, consumers, and manufacturing, along with rising risks of stagflation.

 

The rising US dollar-Philippine peso $USDPHP suggests that the easing of this deficit (and the twin deficits) must be ephemeral. (Figure 5, lowest diagram)

 

___

References:

 

S&P Global Philippines Manufacturing PMI Filipino manufacturing output slides into contraction for the first time since July 2022, April 1, 2024, spglobal.com