Q3 2024 5.2% GDP: Consumers Struggle Amid Financial Loosening, PSEi 30 Deviates from the GDP’s Trajectory

 

it is important to recognize that real GDP is an analytic concept. Despite the name, real GDP is not “real” in the sense that it can, even in principle, be observed or collected directly, in the same sense that current-dollar GDP cannot in principle be observed or collected as the sum of actual spending on final goods and services in the economy. Quantities of apples and oranges can in principle be collected, but they cannot be added to obtain the total quantity of ‘fruit’ output in the economy—Steven Landefeld and Robert P. Parker, Bureau of Economic Analysis, 1995

In this issue 

Q3 2024 5.2% GDP: Consumers Struggle Amid Financial Loosening, PSEi 30 Deviates from the GDP’s Trajectory

I. The PSEi 30 Deviated from GDP’s Trajectory

II. The Treasury Markets as a Harbinger of the Economic Slowdown

III. Lessons from the 2024 US Elections: Markets Overwhelm Surveys

IV. GDP: A Tool for Political Narrative

V. The GDP Trend Line in Context: Insights from SWS Self-Poverty and Hunger Surveys

VI. Q3’s GDP Story: Consumer Spending Rebounds on Declining Inflation and Lower Rates

VII. Consumers Struggle Amid Rising Employment and Vigorous Bank Credit Expansion

VIII. Lethargic Q3 2024 Sales of Wilcon and Robinsons Retail Challenge the Consumer Rebound Narrative

IX. Public Spending Segment of the Marcos-nomics Stimulus: Are Authorities Pulling Back?

Q3 2024 5.2% GDP: Consumers Struggle Amid Financial Loosening, PSEi 30 Deviates from the GDP’s Trajectory

Despite declining inflation rates and lower interest rates, Philippine consumers face tremendous obstacles, as shown by the 5.2% Q3 GDP growth. The PSEi 30 has mispriced the GDP's trajectory 

Reuters, November 7, 2024: The Philippine economy grew in the third quarter at its slowest annual pace in more than a year as severe weather disrupted government spending and dampened farm output, to strengthen the case for further policy easing. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew 5.2% in the July-September on the year, government data showed on Thursday, below a Reuters poll forecast of 5.7%, for the most tepid rise since expansion of 4.3% in the second quarter of 2023.

I. The PSEi 30 Deviated from GDP’s Trajectory 

Stock markets are often considered discounting mechanisms for future economic activity. But are they? 

The PSEi 30’s impressive 13.4% return in Q3 2024—the best since 2010—was largely based on expectations that low interest rates would stimulate economic activity. 

However, despite the BSP’s rate cut in August 2024 and the tacit Marcos-nomics stimulus, Q3 GDP fell to its lowest level since the 4.3% recorded in Q2 2023.

Figure 1

Viewed in the context of the 15% year-over-year returns at the end of last Q3, the PSEi 30 has moved in the opposite direction to the GDP. (Figure 1, topmost graph) 

Faced with this inconvenient reality, the PSEi plunged 2.32% this week, marking its third consecutive weekly decline and dipping below the 7,000 level—a 7.6% drop from the October 7th peak of 7,554.7. 

Interestingly, a local media outlet, still grappling with "Trump Derangement Syndrome," attributed this decline to Trump's electoral victory, suggesting that local stocks "price in the risks of a second Donald Trump presidency and an economic slowdown."  

If the "Trump trade" holds any truth, not only did US stocks soar to new records, but Asian equities also saw significant boosts this week. Among the region's 19 national benchmarks, 14 recorded positive returns with an average gain of 1.33%!

The exceptions were Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam, India, and Sri Lanka. How does this fit into the narrative of the "Trump trade"?

Moreover, it's not just the PSEi 30 that should raise our concerns. Given that the financial sector has been a market leader, the financial index also warrants close attention.

The financial index posted a remarkable 23.4% year-on-year return at the end of Q3 2024, despite a notable deceleration in the sector's GDP since its peak in Q4 2023. The sector recorded an 8.8% real GDP growth in Q3, up from 8% in Q2, but lower than the 12% and 10.3% growth in Q4 2023 and Q1 2024, respectively. Bank-led financials have been a critical source of gains, as evidenced by their increasing share of the sector's GDP, despite the 2022-2023 rate hikes. (Figure 1, middle and lowest images)

Led by banks, the financial sector is the most interconnected with the local economy.  Its health is contingent or dependent upon the activities of its non-financial counterparties.

Alternatively, the sector’s outgrowth relies on political subsidies and is subject to diminishing returns.

Yet ultimately, this should reflect on its core operational fundamentals of lending and investing.

This week, the financial index fell by 2.9%.  As previously mentioned, trading activities in the PSE have been heavily skewed toward this sector.

In essence, the divergence between the PSEi 30 and GDP illustrates the significant market dislocations caused by the allure and regime of easy money—a quest for something for nothing.

II. The Treasury Markets as a Harbinger of the Economic Slowdown

Figure 2

As we have repeatedly pointed out, the Philippine Treasury markets have long been signaling an economic slowdown. The steep slope observed in Q1 has shifted to a bearish flattening and, subsequently, an inversion of the "belly," suggesting a further deceleration in inflation and a downshift in economic activity. (Figure 2, topmost diagram) 

Experts have rarely discussed how the declining inflation reflects a downturn in demand. However, this scenario was evident across the entire Treasury curve in 2024, which explains the sharp plunge in T-bill rates and increased expectations that the BSP would cut rates. The BSP responded by implementing cuts in both August and October. 

III. Lessons from the 2024 US Elections: Markets Overwhelm Surveys

The 2024 U.S. elections provided a striking illustration of the comparative efficiency between markets and surveys. 

As pointed out above, markets are imperfect, but most of their vulnerabilities stem from underlying interventions that enhance them. However, when people place bets to prove their beliefs or convictions, they demonstrate "skin in the game""—a vested interest in success through real-world actions or "having a shared risk when taking a major decision."

In contrast, individuals can express opinions they do not genuinely believe. Numerous factors—such as assumptions, coverage, inputs, delivery, and measurement—contribute to errors in surveys. Worse still, surveys can be designed to achieve specific outcomes rather than accurately estimate reality.

Using the last week’s elections, the average betting odds from several prediction markets, led by the largest platform, Polymarket, indicated that Trump would win by a landslide going into the election. (Figure 2, lowest chart)

This was contrary to the average polls, which showed a razor-thin edge for Democratic candidate Kamala Harris.  Interestingly, similar to the 2016 elections, these polling discrepancies were exposed only after Trump’s victory. (Figure 2, middle table)

By sweeping all the battleground or swing states, Trump secured an electoral landslide winning 301 to 226 (according to The New York Times) and also became the first Republican to win the popular vote since George W. Bush in 2004.

This experience reaffirmed that markets have proven to be more reliable than surveys. And this reliability extends beyond elections to broader economic metrics, exposing vulnerabilities even in government data (such as inflation, labor statistics, and GDP).

Although designed to be objective and systematic—where hard and verifiable transactional records form part of the government’s comprehensive data—a significant portion still relies on self-reported or opinion-based data.

These components introduce the potential for bias and inaccuracies.

More importantly, as a political institution, government data is not only susceptible to errors but can also be engineered to advance the agenda of the incumbent government.

One way to countercheck the reliability of these data points is through the logic of entwined data—the idea that when multiple, independent data sets or sources are connected, discrepancies or patterns can be identified. By cross-referencing market data, surveys, and government statistics, we can better assess the accuracy of any single dataset. The entwinement of data from diverse sources can serve as a powerful validation tool, especially when inconsistencies or contradictions emerge. 

Thus, comprehensiveness, large scale, and systematic nature of government data collection do not make it foolproof from errors caused by either interventions or design. 

IV. GDP: A Tool for Political Narrative 

The establishment has promoted GDP as an estimation of economic well-being, but that’s only a segment of the entire spectrum.  

Unknown to the public, GDP is primarily a political tool.

In the 1660s, William Petty conceived GDP as a means to estimate war financing during the Second Anglo-Dutch War.

Under the influence of John Maynard Keynes, it was further used to promote wartime planning during World War II, which eventually evolved into—or became the foundation of—modern macroeconomic policy (Coyle, 2014).

Simon Kuznets, a pivotal figure in the development of modern GDP, famously cautioned that "economic welfare cannot be adequately measured unless the personal distribution of income is known… The welfare of a nation can, therefore, scarcely be inferred from a measurement of national income as defined above." (bold added) [Wikipedia, GDP]

This statement underscores the limitations of GDP as a comprehensive measure of economic well-being.

In 1962, Kuznets further emphasized the need for clarity in economic growth metrics, stating: "Distinctions must be kept in mind between quantity and quality of growth, between costs and returns, and between the short and long run. Goals for more growth should specify more growth of what and for what."

This highlights his belief that economic indicators should reflect not just output but also the broader implications of growth on society.

Applied to the current developments…

The Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), citing the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs as the source for their adaptation of the System of National Accounts (SNA), noted that "GDP is used to evaluate the overall performance of the economy and, hence, to judge the relative success or failure of economic policies pursued by governments." (bold added) [unstats, 2009]

The embedded assumption is that a factory GDP—or a top-down model—drives the economy.

But if that’s the case, then some questions arise: 

-Why doesn’t the Soviet Union still exist? 

-Why do black markets or informal economies emerge or thrive in heavily regulated economies? 

-Does the government dictate to Jollibee or SM who they should sell to? 

Yet, aside from gaining popular approval for election purposes, the contemporaneous implicit goal of GDP growth could be related to ease of accessing public savings to fund government expenditures.

V. The GDP Trend Line in Context: Insights from SWS Self-Poverty and Hunger Surveys

Still, there are many ways to "skin"—or analyze—the GDP "cat."

Although GDP is presented as a year-over-year (YoY) change predicated on a base effect, a very significant but largely ignored fact is its trendline. 

Figure 3

Fundamentally, despite all the media and establishment cheerleading—particularly with the emphasis on achieving an upper-middle-income economy—both nominal and real GDP have been performing below their pre-pandemic trendlines. (Figure 3, topmost diagram)

Worse, the Q3 GDP growth of 5.2% is sitting precariously on the support level of a subsidiary trendline, suggesting it may be testing this support. What happens if it breaks?

Additionally, what about the recent SWS Q3 2024 surveys exhibiting self-poverty ratings at 2008 highs, and hunger incidence reaching its second highest level since September 2020, during the pandemic recession? (see our previous discussion here)

Has the SWS survey been validated?

As a side note, the left-leaning OCTA Research group's Q3 survey results were starkly different from those of the SWS.

Have the authorities made a partial concession to the SWS findings by revising down the GDP growth estimates?

As a reminder, polls or surveys—whether conducted by the private sector or the government—are opinion-based or self-reported data and are inherently prone to errors. 

VI. Q3’s GDP Story: Consumer Spending Rebounds on Declining Inflation and Lower Rates 

GDP is not just about the numbers; it has been crafted to tell a story. 

Essentially, it follows the mainstream’s logic: slowing inflation and lower interest rates would boost consumption and, consequently, GDP. 

Well, that is how the Q3 5.2% GDP played out.  

From the expenditure side of GDP, real household consumption increased from 4.7% in Q2 to 5.1% in Q3, thereby boosting its share from 67.7% to 72.8%. (Figure 3, middle image) 

In contrast, government spending on GDP dropped significantly, from 11.9% in Q2 to 5% in Q3, reducing its share from 17% to 14.7% during the same period. 

Meanwhile, due a slump in government activities, construction GDP growth nearly halved from 16.2% to 8.9%, diminishing its share from 19.4% to 14.1%. Government construction GDP tumbled from 21.7% to 3.7%. 

Thanks to increases in machinery, transport, and miscellaneous equipment, durable equipment GDP surged from a contraction of 4.5% in Q2 to growth of 8.1% in Q3. (Figure 3, lowest visual) 

Nevertheless, exports plummeted from 4.2% in Q2 to a shrinkage of 1% in Q3, while imports increased from 5.3% to 6.4%. The widened gap in favor of imports—net exports—contributed to the slowdown of GDP. 

This summarizes the expenditure-based GDP analysis.

VII. Consumers Struggle Amid Rising Employment and Vigorous Bank Credit Expansion

Circling back to consumers: considering that the Philippine economy has allegedly reached near-record employment levels (close to full employment), why does consumer per capita growth continue to struggle?

Figure 4 

The employment rate hit 96.3% in September, yet Q3 household per capita growth increased only slightly, from 3.8% to 4.2%—the third lowest growth rate since Q2 2021. (Figure 4, topmost window)

Additionally, what explains the consumers' ongoing challenges in light of Universal-commercial bank lending, which reached a record high in nominal terms and grew by 11.33% in Q3—the highest rate since Q4 2022? This growth was notably powered by household credit, which also surged by 23.44%, although it was down from its peak of 25.4% in Q1 2024. (Figure 4, middle graph)

On a related note, even though the money supply (M3) hit a record of Php 17.58 trillion in Q3, its growth rate of 5.4% was the lowest since Q3 2022.

Despite the crescendoing systemic leverage (public debt plus bank credit expansion), which grew by 11.4%—the highest since Q4 2024—to a record Php 27.97 trillion, why has the money supply been trending downward?

Moreover, as evidence of the redistribution effects of Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) policies favoring banks amidst the thrust towards financialization, various money supply metrics (M1, M2, and M3) relative to GDP remain at pre-pandemic levels in Q3 2024, despite having clawed back some gains from the 2021 milestone. (Figure 4, lowest chart)

Despite all this, the persistent challenges of consumers continue.

Yet, this raises a crucial point: the GDP appears increasingly dependent on money supply growth and credit expansion.

VIII. Lethargic Q3 2024 Sales of Wilcon and Robinsons Retail Challenge the Consumer Rebound Narrative

There’s more.

Figure 5

In the face of a slow recovery in consumption, retail GDP dropped from 5.8% in Q2 to 5.2% in Q3 2024. (Figure 5, topmost image)

Oddly, bank lending to the sector has been soaring; it was up 12% in September from 9.3% last June.

Where is the money being borrowed by the sector being spent?

Meanwhile, Household GDP figures might be inflated.

Two major retail chains operating in different sectors have reported stagnation in topline performance.

Despite expanding its stores by 12% year-over-year (YoY), the largest downstream real estate consumer chain, Wilcon Depot [PSE: WLCON], experienced a 3.35% YoY contraction in sales and a 4.35% decline quarter-over-quarter (QoQ). (Figure 5, middle graph)

The company's worsening sales conditions have partially reflected the plunge in the sector’s Consumer Price Index (CPI).

Similarly, Robinsons Retail [PSE: RRHI], one of the largest multi-format retailers, reported another lethargic topline performance. (Figure 5, lowest chart)

In Q3, the firm’s sales increased by 3.13%, primarily driven by its food segment (supermarkets and convenience stores), which grew by 4.8%, along with drug stores, which increased by 9%. 

However, three of its other five segments—including department stores, DIY, and specialty—suffered sales contractions. 

Taking into account that the sales from these two retail chains constitute a portion of nominal GDP, applying the GDP deflator would indicate a deeper decline in WLCON's sales and flat sales growth for RRHI. 

Despite the slowdown in inflation and the rapid growth in consumer bank borrowings, consumer spending has gravitated toward essentials (food and drugs) while reducing purchases of non-essentials. 

This observation lends credence to the recent Social Weather Stations (SWS) self-poverty ratings. 

So far, despite loose financial conditions, the performance of these two retail chains contradicts the notion embedded in GDP that consumers have partly opened their wallets in Q3. 

For a clearer picture of consumer health, we await the financial reports of the largest retail chain, SM, and other major goods and food retail chains. 

Imagine the potential impact of real tightening conditions on consumer spending and GDP! 

IX. Public Spending Segment of the Marcos-nomics Stimulus: Are Authorities Pulling Back? 

Recent GDP data suggests a slowdown in public spending, but a closer look reveals a different narrative. 

While overall public spending growth has declined, sectors heavily influenced by the government are seeing gains. 

Specifically, public administration and defense GDP rose from 1.8% in Q2 to 3.7% in Q3. Similarly, sectors with significant government involvement, such as education and health, reported growths from 1.9% to 2.6% and 9.4% to 11.9%, respectively. 

Despite the appearance of a slowdown, the bureaucracy and government-exposed sectors continued to show growth. 

That’s not all.

Figure 6

According to the Bureau of Treasury’s cash operations report, the Q3 expenditure-to-GDP ratio remains at a pandemic-level rate of 24%. 

Additionally, although tax revenues improved, the Q3 deficit-to-GDP increased from 5.3% to 5.7%, again reflecting pandemic-level deficits. 

It’s essential to note that the treasury data and the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) GDP figures—which include their calculation of public spending—represent an apples-to-oranges comparison. 

However, we can still glean insights from a historical perspective of the Treasury’s activities. 

So, why do current data sets indicate sustained increases despite the perceived temperance in government spending? 

While authorities may embellish their deficit data, the consequences are likely to manifest elsewhere. 

Aside from the counterparties that provide financing via debt, it will manifest in the trade balance and eventually impact the private economy—via consumers: the crowding-out effect. 

Q3 Public debt stands at 61.3% of the sum of the last 4 quarters (Q4 2023 to Q3 2024) 

Thus, it’s not surprising that Q3’s fiscal deficit coincided with a notable spike in the trade deficit, which ranks as the fourth highest on record. 

The existence of "twin deficits" points to excessive spending and reveals a historic savings-investment gap that necessitates record borrowing through debt issuance and central bank interventions. 

Adding to this context, the massive RRR cut and BSP’s second round cut of 25 basis points all took effect this October or in the fourth quarter.

We can also expect the government to aim to accomplish its end-of-year spending targets in December, adding to this period’s fiscal activity.

This implies that the full impact of the 2024 "Marcos-nomics" stimulus implemented in Q4 could result in a short-term GDP boost but at a substantial cost to the private sector economy. 

___

references

Steven Landefeld and Robert P. Parker, Preview of the Comprehensive Revision of the National Income and Product Accounts: BEA’s New Featured Measures of Output and Prices, Bureau of Economic Analysis, 1995

Diana Coyle, Warfare and the Invention of GDP, the Globalist, April 6, 2014 

Wikipedia, Gross Domestic Product, Limitations at introduction 

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, System of National Accounts 2008, 2009, p. 4-5 https://unstats.un.org/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weakening Consumers: Philippine August CPI fell to 3.3% as Q2 2024 Consumer Non-Performing Loans Accelerated

 At the outset, the masses misinterpreted it as nothing more than a scandalous rise in prices. Only later, under the name of inflation, the process was correctly comprehended as the downfall of money—Konrad Heiden in 1944

In this issue

Weakening Consumers: Philippine August CPI fell to 3.3% as Q2 2024 Consumer Non-Performing Loans Accelerated

I. August CPI’s 3.3% Validated the Philippine Yield Curve; Continuing Loss of the Peso’s Purchasing and Magnified Volatility

II. Utilities Overstated the CPI, Headline CPI versus Bottom 30% CPI Translates to Broadening Inequality

III. Plummeting CORE CPI Amidst Record Consumer Bank Loans

IV. Slowing CPI Despite Record Streak in Public Spending and Modest Supply-Side Growth

V. Examining the Discrepancies in Employment Data and Consumer Demand

VI. Philippine Banking System’s Seismic Transformation: The Shift Towards Consumer Lending and its Developing Risks

VII. The Dynamics Behind Record High Consumer Borrowings: Inflation, Addiction and Refinancing

VIII. Surging Consumer NPLs as Driver of Falling Inflation

IX. Expect a Systemic Bailout: Pandemic 2.0 Template; a Third Wave of Inflation 

Weakening Consumers: Philippine August CPI fell to 3.3% as Q2 2024 Consumer Non-Performing Loans Accelerated

I. August CPI’s 3.3% Validated the Philippine Yield Curve; Continuing Loss of the Peso’s Purchasing and Magnified Volatility 

The recent decline in the Philippine CPI, which fell to 3.3% in August, is a symptom of strained consumers. Overleveraging has led to an acceleration in consumer loan NPLs in Q2. 

GMANews, September 5, 2024: The Philippines’ inflation rate eased in August, after an acceleration seen in the prior month, due to slower increases in food and transportation cost during the period, the Philippines Statistics Authority (PSA) reported on Thursday. At a press conference, National Statistician and PSA chief Claire Dennis Mapa said that inflation —which measures the rate of increase in the prices of goods and services— decelerated to 3.3% last month, slower than the 4.4% rate in July. This brought the year-to-date inflation print in the first eight months of 2024 to 3.6%, a slowdown from the 5.3% rate in the same period last year and still within the government’s ceiling of 2% to 4%. 

Quotes from previous posts… 

despite the 4.4% CPI bump in July (and Q2 6.3% GDP), the Philippine treasury market continues to defy inflationary expectations by maintaining a deep inversion of the curve’s belly, which again signals slower inflation, upcoming BSP cuts, and increased financial and economic uncertainty. (Prudent Investor, August 2024)

__ 

Moreover, the curious take is that despite all the massive stimulus, the belly’s inversion in the Philippine treasury market has only deepened at the close of August. 

This does not suggest a build-up of price pressures or a strong rebound in the private sector. On the other hand, rising short-term rates indicate intensifying liquidity issues.  

In the end, while Marcos-nomics stimulus seems to have reaccelerated liquidity, a resurgence of inflation is likely to exacerbate "stagflationary" pressures and increase the likelihood of a bust in the Philippines’ credit bubble. (Prudent Investor, September 2024) 

Let us examine the data in relation to other relevant metrics.

First, the August Consumer Price Index (CPI) fundamentally confirmed the signals provided by the Philippine yield curve regarding the resumption of its downtrend. We will explore this in more detail later.

Figure 1

Second, a slowing CPI does not imply that prices are falling, as some officials have suggested. Rather, it indicates a deceleration in the rate of price increases for the average goods and services in the government’s CPI basket. That is to say, authorities continue to use the inflation channel as an indirect means of taxation. Even from the standpoint of the CPI, the Philippine peso has lost over 99% of its purchasing power since 1957. (Figure 1, topmost chart)

Third, the headline CPI has become increasingly volatile, as evidenced by its significant fluctuations: it surged from 3.7% in June to 4.4% in July, then decreased to 3.3% in August. The rate of change in the Month-on-Month (MoM) data illustrates this volatility. (Figure 1, middle image) 

Notably, with the largest weighting in the CPI basket, food is usually the culprit for this volatility. 

II. Utilities Overstated the CPI, Headline CPI versus Bottom 30% CPI Translates to Broadening Inequality 

Fourth, the upside spike in housing, water, gas, and other utilities inflated the headline CPI. Rent and utilities were the only categories that experienced an increase in August on a month-on-month (MoM) basis. (Figure 1, lowest graph) 

Without the impact of rent and utilities, the headline CPI would have been drastically lower. This category has a significant weighting in the CPI basket, with a 21.4% share.

Figure 2

Fifth, the decline in the rate of price increases, as indicated by the headline CPI of 3.3% in August, had minimal impact on the bottom 30% of households, who experienced a CPI of 4.7% (down from 5.8% in July). However, the disparity between these categories remains at 2018 levels. (Figure 2, topmost diagram) 

Even with its flawed measurement, the government’s CPI highlights the broadening inequality. 

III. Plummeting CORE CPI Amidst Record Consumer Bank Loans 

Sixth, the volatility of the headline CPI hasn’t been corroborated by the non-food, non-energy Core CPI, which continues to decline. 

Although the gap between the headline CPI and the Core CPI has narrowed, it remains substantial due to the relatively faster decline in the Core CPI. (Figure 2, middle graph) 

Seventh, the law of supply and demand dictates that if the supply of goods or services exceeds demand, prices will fall. Conversely, if demand outstrips supply, prices will rise. 

In the current context, the weakening of the Core CPI is a symptom of the sustained erosion of domestic demand. 

This is exemplified by the consistently diminishing rate of price increases in retail components such as furnishing household equipment and maintenance, clothing and footwear, and personal care and miscellaneous goods. (Figure 2, lowest chart)

Figure 3

Eighth, the growth of total universal-commercial bank loans remains on a remarkable streak, posting a 10.4% growth rate last July—its third consecutive month of 10% growth. (Figure 3, topmost window) 

Moreover, universal commercial bank household credit grew at an even faster pace of 24.3%, marking its twenty-third consecutive month of over 20% growth! (Figure 3, middle diagram) 

Given this explosive growth in consumer and overall bank credit, which should have theoretically stimulated demand, why hasn’t it boosted the CPI?

IV. Slowing CPI Despite Record Streak in Public Spending and Modest Supply-Side Growth 

Ninth, what has happened to the "Marcos-nomics stimulus" and the ramping up of Q2 record debt-financed public spending? Why have these measures not bolstered demand and the CPI? (Figure 3, lowest chart)

Figure 4

Tenth, the supply side has hardly been a factor in the CPI slowdown.

The slackening of imports, which were down 7.5% (in USD million) in June, was not an anomaly but a trend since peaking in August 2022.  (Figure 4, topmost pane) 

Domestic manufacturing has also not shown excessive growth. Manufacturing posted a 4.7% value growth and 5.25% volume growth last July, marking the third highest monthly growth since August 2023 (a year ago). (Figure 4, lower left chart) 

The headline S&P Global Philippines Manufacturing PMI reported an unchanged index of 51.2 in August, unchanged from July. (Figure 4, lower right chart) 

The PMI index has been consolidating with a downside bias, as demonstrated by the "rounding top." 

If the supply side had managed to grow at a minor to moderate rate in recent months, then demand represents the weak link behind the sliding CPI rate.  

The lack of significant supply-side expansion suggests that the primary driver of the CPI slowdown is the erosion of domestic demand. 

V. Examining the Discrepancies in Employment Data and Consumer Demand 

Why so?

The employment data is unlikely to provide a satisfactory explanation. 

Aside from the questionable nature of the statistics, the government attributed the swelling of July's employment rate to fresh graduates entering the workforce.

 

GMANews, September 6: The number of unemployed Filipinos increased in July as millions of young individuals, who graduated from college or senior high school and entered the labor force, did not land jobs during the period, the Philippines Statistics Authority (PSA) reported on Friday.

The decrease in the labor force participation rate from 66% in June to 63.5% in July likely underestimated the true number of unemployed individuals.

Figure 5

It's worth noting that a "rounding top" appears to be a persistent trend in the labor participation rate. (Figure 5, topmost diagram)

If this pattern continues, then for whatever reasons, it's likely that the labor force will shrink, which would negatively impact the employment population.

While most sectors reported decreases in employment (MoM) last July, the government (public administration and defense), finance, and IT sectors reported significant gains. The increase in government jobs is not surprising, given that they are one of the largest employers, particularly with the record high public spending in Q2. (Figure 5, middle image)

In any case, despite the second-highest employment rate in June, the rise in unemployment in July suggests that the substantial growth in bank credit has not been sufficient to create enough investments to absorb new graduates. 

The irony is that even if this data were close to accurate, the high employment rate demand story has been incongruous or inconsistent with the slowing consumer, the record high consumer bank credit levels, and the CPI. 

Another paradox is that the volatility in the labor data may be influenced by social mobility. In reality, the Philippine labor market has been beset by the byzantine nature of onerous labor regulations. 

VI. Philippine Banking System’s Seismic Transformation: The Shift Towards Consumer Lending and its Developing Risks 

Beyond that, the slope of the Philippine Treasury markets provides insights into economic conditions, inflation, and potential risks. 

Not only has it accurately predicted CPI dynamics, but it has also indicated the likelihood of increased economy-related risks. 

Consider this: Why has the CPI been on a temporary downtrend despite record levels of Universal Commercial bank consumer lending? This observation applies even to production loans, but our focus here is on consumer loans. 

The banking system’s total consumer loans, including real estate loans, surged to an all-time high of PHP 2.81 trillion in Q2 2024. This represents a record 21.75% of total bank lending, meaning that one-fifth of all Universal Commercial bank lending has been directed towards consumers.  (Figure 5, lowest graph) 

Four-fifths of these, which also demonstrates a declining share, represent lending to the supply side sector, primarily benefiting the elites.

Figure 6

This data represents evidence that Philippine banks have undergone a seismic transformation: a preference for consumers over producers. 

From a sectoral perspective, banks have also shifted their lending preferences toward high-risk, short-term lending—specifically credit cards and salary loans. 

Since 2017, the percentage share of credit cards relative to the total has surged to a milestone high, while the share of salary loans has also increased since 2021. Notably, the rapid growth of these segments has come at the expense of real estate and motor vehicle loans. (Figure 6, topmost image) 

Strikingly, the share of consumer real estate loans peaked at 45% in Q4 2021 and then nose-dived to 37% by Q2 2024. 

In a nutshell, banks have "backed up their trucks" to rapidly leverage Philippine consumers. 

VII. The Dynamics Behind Record High Consumer Borrowings: Inflation, Addiction and Refinancing 

The all-time high in consumer lending did not emerge in a vacuum. 

Primarily, consumers have turned to credit cards and salary loans to compensate for the loss of purchasing power due to inflation. 

Secondly, this trend has deepened consumers' reliance on credit cards and salary loans. 

Thirdly, the extended leveraging of consumers' balance sheets necessitates further credit to refinance or roll over existing debt. Some individuals use multiple credit cards, while others may tap into salary loans or borrow from the supply side for the refinancing of existing debt. 

It is important to note that the consumer credit data reveals an escalation in concentration risks. 

The surge in consumer lending indicates that only a small segment of the population has access to formal credit systems. 

The BSP’s Q2 2023 Financial Inclusion data reveals that consumer credit, including credit cards, salary loans, and other forms of bank credit, is limited to a minority segment of the Philippine population. (Figure 6, middle table)

Not only in finances, this group—primarily from the high-income sector—has been capturing a significant portion of the nation’s resources funded by credit. They are the primary beneficiaries of the BSP’s inflation policies. 

However, they also represent the most fragile source of a potential crisis. 

Conversely, the low level of participation in formal banking does not equate to a low level of leverage for the unbanked population. Instead, this larger segment relies on informal sources for credit. 

However, they also represent the most fragile source of a potential crisis.

Lastly, having reached their borrowing limits, some consumers have begun to default. 

VIII. Surging Consumer NPLs as Driver of Falling Inflation

Have the media or mainstream experts addressed this issue? 

Not when financial services are being marketed or deposits solicited; discussing conflicts of interest remains a taboo.

Despite subsidies and relief measures, the Non-Performing Loans (NPL) in consumer lending have been rising, driven primarily by credit cards and salary loans. (Figure 6, lowest chart)

Figure 7

Again, the all-time high in credit card and salary loans has led to a surge in NPLs. According to the BSP’s various measures, the NPLs for credit cards and salary loans relative to total NPLs in the Total Loan Portfolio (TLP) have been intensifying since 2021 (for salary loans) and 2023 (for credit card loans). (Figure 7, topmost, second to the highest and lowest-left and right graphs)

Despite the massive BSP support, the fastest-growing segments for banks are also the primary sources of their weaknesses. 

Published banking and financial data may be understated due to these relief measures and other factors. 

Why are banks significantly borrowing (focusing on short-term loans), competing with San Miguel, both listed and unlisted non-financials, financials, and the government? 

So, there you have it. The slowing inflation in the face of rampant credit growth is a symptom of the mounting balance sheet problems faced by consumers. 

Borrowings are not only used for spending but are increasingly being utilized to recycle loans—the Minsky Ponzi syndrome process is in motion. 

Extending balance sheet leveraging has not only weighed on consumer spending but has also caused a rise in credit delinquency. 

It also exposes the façade of a 6.3% Q2 GDP. 

The lesson is: current conditions reveal not only the fragile state of consumers but, more importantly, exposes the vulnerability of Philippine banks. 

The treasury markets have been signaling these concerns. 

IX. Expect a Systemic Bailout: Pandemic 2.0 Template; a Third Wave of Inflation 

But it doesn’t end here. 

Do you think the government would allow GDP to sink, which would deprive them of financing for their boondoggles? 

Naturally, no. So, authorities have embarked on a tacit "Marcos-nomics stimulus" to prevent cross-cascading defaults, initially marked by a resurgence of illiquidity. 

With the upcoming elections, public spending has surged, leading to increased monetary growth, as indicated by the most liquid measure, M1 money supply. 

Yes, this exposes the artificiality of a so-called "restrictive" or "tightening" regime.

Needless to say, this process will only foster more economic imbalances, which will manifest through the enlarged “twin deficits.”

Economic maladjustments will become evident in the growing mismatch between demand and supply, as well as between savings and investment (record savings-investment gap), leading to increased fragility in the banking system’s balance sheet. 

This, in turn, will prompt more easing policies from the BSP and accelerated interventions and liquidity injections from the tandem of financial institutions (led by banks) and the BSP. 

We should expect the BSP to expand and extend its relief measures to the banking system in an effort to buy time.

Or, the BSP’s strategy to address an escalating debt problem is to facilitate accelerated debt absorption. Amazing! 

As such, we should expect a third wave of inflation, in the fullness of time, which will exacerbate the leveraging of the economic system and worsen the current predicament. 

The political path dependency is driven primarily by perceived "free lunches" (or throwing money into the system). 

The promised bull market will not be in Philippine assets but in debt, leveraging, and its attendant risks. 

So, despite the Philippine peso floating along with its regional peers, benefiting from the perceived "Powell Pivot," the USD/PHP exchange rate should eventually reflect the developing economic and financial strains. 

Until a critical disorder surfaces, a reversal in this political direction is unlikely.

Eventually, the treasury curve will indicate when this reversal might occur. 

The point is that even when distorted by interventions, markets are reliable indicators of future events. 

___

References 

Prudent Investor, The Philippines' July 4.4% CPI: Stagflation Remains a Primary Political, Economic, and Financial Risk August 12, 2024

Prudent Investor, Philippine Government’s July Deficit "Narrowed" from Changes in VAT Reporting Schedule, Raised USD 2.5 Billion Plus $500 Million Climate Financing September 1, 2024

 

Bullseye! BSP Opens with First Rate Cut, the "Marcos-nomics Stimulus " is on a Roll! PSE’s Q2 Retail Activities Validates Ongoing Consumer Weakness

 

The lesson of history, then, is that even as institutions and policy makers improve, there will always be a temptation to stretch the limits. Just as an individual can go bankrupt no matter how rich she starts out, a financial system can collapse under the pressure of greed, politics, and profits no matter how well regulated it seems to be― Carmen M. Reinhart

In this issue 

Bullseye! BSP Opens with First Rate Cut, the "Marcos-nomics Stimulus " is on a Roll! PSE’s Q2 Retail Activities Validates Ongoing Consumer Weakness 

I. Bullseye! BSP Opens with First Rate Cut, the "Marcos-nomics Stimulus " is on a Roll!

II. Slowing Retail GDP Validated by Topline Performance of PSE’s Retail Chains

III. Marcos-nomics Rate Cut(s) Designed to Rescue the Banking System; Banks Bolstered the PSEi 30’s Stagnant Q2 Net Income

IV. Marcos-nomics Rate Cut(s): Reduce Debt Servicing Costs to Accommodate MORE Debt!

V. BSP Rate Cut Validates the Price Signals of the Philippine Treasury Market

VI. Summary and Conclusion: Watch for the Third and Fourth Phase of the Marcos-Stimulus (Pandemic Rescue Template 2.0) 

Bullseye! BSP Opens with First Rate Cut, the "Marcos-nomics Stimulus " is on a Roll! PSE’s Q2 Retail Activities Validates Ongoing Consumer Weakness

The BSP opened its series of monetary easing with a rate cut last week validating our thesis that the unannounced "Marcos-nomics stimulus" is on a roll!

I. Bullseye! BSP Opens with First Rate Cut, the "Marcos-nomics Stimulus " is on a Roll!

Bullseye!

In its second phase of the unannounced Marcos-nomics stimulus, the BSP (Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas) began its campaign to formally ease financial conditions with its first rate cut.

The fact that the "Marcos-nomics stimulus" is on a roll means that widening fiscal deficits, which should also reverberate into "trade deficits" and expand the "twin deficits," should escalate public debt levels and, correspondingly, increase the debt burden. 

With fiscal deficits likely to bulge ahead, prompting more borrowings, the logical sequence would be for the BSP to cut rates to ease the onus of debt servicing.

And that’s only the argument for Philippine government debt. 

The BSP’s case for rate cuts will also involve private sector’s mounting debt burden or systemic debt in general. And that excludes shadow banking or informal finance. 

Therefore, BSP rate cuts represent the next phase of the "Marcos-nomics stimulus." (Prudent Investor, July 2024; bold original) 

GMA News, August, 15, 2024: The Monetary Board of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) on Thursday decided to reduce policy rates by 25 basis points, the first cut in nearly four years and the first adjustment since the off-cycle hike in October 2023. 

Why would the BSP start a series of rate cuts with a Q2 headline GDP of 6.3% (6% for the 1H GDP)? 

Yet, the BSP continues to confuse the public by hedging its position with a "rinse and repeat" stance: We will cut, we will not cut, we will cut, we will not cut... to thy kingdom come. 

Just a day before, a business media outlet even cited the BSP as having ""more room to stay tight" after better-than-expected gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the second quarter." 

Stay tight, then cut rates? Incredible. 

For a supposedly data-driven institution, why fixate on interest rates while ignoring the financial and monetary developments despite their actions?

Figure 1

For instance, the BSP’s report on total financial resources (TFR) rocketed by 10.54% to a record Php 32.332 trillion last June, with the banking system, led by the Universal and Commercial banks, surging by 12.3%. (Figure 1, upper window)

Aggregate TFR and bank FR amounted to 128% and 107% of GDP, respectively. 

That is to say, not only have growth rates been accelerating, but banks have also been deepening their stranglehold over the nation’s financial resources—which alternatively translates to an escalation of concentration risk. (Figure 1, middle graph) 

Needless to ask, why would TFR and bank assets skyrocket if rates have been "tight?" Or, why the crescendo of systemic leverage? 

Amazing. 

II. Slowing Retail GDP Validated by Topline Performance of PSE’s Retail Chains 

Getting back to the essence of the Marcos-nomics, despite the Orwellian language, why the cut rates? 

To gauge the heartbeat of consumers, we use the PSE’s Quarterly Report (17Q) to analyze the quarterly activities of the major non-construction retail chains listed on the stock exchange (SM Retail, Puregold, Robinsons Retail, Philippine Seven, SSI Group, and Metro Retail Group). 

The growth rate of BIG 6 retail chains bounced marginally from the Q1 low of 5.13% to 7.22% in Q2.  However, since peaking in Q3 2022, its growth rate has been slowing—exhibited by the downtrend. (Figure 1, lowest image) 

On the other hand, since hitting a low of 10.6% in Q3 2023, the nominal retail GDP has improved in the last three quarters—with Q2 posting a 12.8% growth.  The revenues of the BIG 6 accounted for an estimated 24.6% share of the Philippine retail market, based on the retail GDP. 

The huge variance in growth rates between the revenues of the BIG 6 tell us that either the NON-listed retail chains OUTPERFORMED, or that the retail GDP has been exaggerated. 

The thing is, the growth rate may differ, but the trends resonated. 

Real consumer GDP also corroborated the slowdown. 

In the first two quarters of 2024, real consumer spending grew by 4.6%. 

The slowdown in consumer spending is just one aspect of the complex chain of people’s actions.

Figure 2

While consumer spending has slowed, loans of the BIG 5 retail chains (excluding SM Retail) hit an all-time high in Q2. (Figure 2, topmost graph) 

As banks continue to shift their portfolios toward consumers—with the gap in favor of consumer lending reaching its highest-level last June—credit card and salary loan non-performing loans (NPLs) have accelerated in Q1 2024. (Figure 2, middle and lowest charts)

Figure 3 

This represents a breathtaking structural transformation anchored on Keynesian ideology that the consumer drives the economy. (Figure 3, topmost graph)

Unfortunately, despite the unprecedented metamorphosis, increased leveraging has only resulted in the material slackening of consumer spending.

Essentially, the consensus comprised of media, experts and officials has overlooked the importance of balance sheet conditions and productivity!

III. Marcos-nomics Rate Cut(s) Designed to Rescue the Banking System; Banks Bolstered the PSEi 30’s Stagnant Q2 Net Income

But there’s more.

The BSP wasn’t transparent enough to reveal that despite the seismic transformation of its business model and the all-time highs in credit expansion within the Philippine banking system, the industry has experienced an erosion of profit growth since Q2 2022—coinciding with rising rates. (Figure 3, middle diagram)

From a low of 2.95% in Q1, bank profits increased by 4.1% in Q2 2024. The data exhibit the sustained corrosion of bank liquidity despite the three-year streak in profit growth.  Bank’s cash-to-deposit and liquid asset-to-deposits on an 11-year downtrend.  (Figure 3, lowest chart)

In my humble opinion, these bank profits represent accounting profits because they conceal massive losses through Held-to-Maturity (HTM) holdings, opaqueness in capital conditions, and unpublished NPLs due to subsidies and various relief measures.

Figure 4

In any case, the big three PSEi banks saved the PSEi 30's Q2 net income activities from outright stagnation.

Net income by the non-financial members of the PSEi slightly contracted by 0.13%. However, the 13.71% net income growth of the PSEi 30 banks boosted the aggregate net income growth to 2.35%. (Figure 4, upper table)

Meanwhile, despite disinflationary forces, revenue growth increased by 9.14% in Q2, pushing the first semester’s topline up by 8.71% (to be discussed in another post).

In brief, it’s not just consumers; the overall slowing of the economy has been evident in the topline and bottom-line performance of the PSEi 30. We will omit the debt conditions of the PSEi 30’s non-financials from this discussion.

As a side note, why then the PSEi 30 pump?

Think of it this way: why the slowdown in the PSE’s performance despite record bank lending and the soaring expansion of systemic leverage (exhibited by members of the PSEi 30)?

Consumer spending per capita GDP peaked in Q1 2021 and has turned south in the face of historic levels of systemic leverage—comprising the formal credit (bank credit plus public debt) system, which accounted for 112% of the annualized 2024 GDP! (Figure 4, lower graph)

Figure 5

As it stands, this monumental build-up in systemic leverage translates to escalating hidden financial skeletons in the form of balance sheet mismatches—which have yet to be revealed. UC bank and public debt accounted for 108% of the annualized 2024 GDP. (Figure 5, topmost chart)

Incredible.

In a nutshell, the Marcos-nomics stimulus via the BSP’s rate cut also represents the RESCUE of the banking system (Pandemic Bailout Template 2.0).

IV. Marcos-nomics Rate Cut(s): Reduce Debt Servicing Costs to Accommodate MORE Debt! 

With the slowing of the real economy, the government has stepped up the tempo of its spending to boost the statistical economy, GDP.

This represents the opening salvo of Marcos-nomics. Besides, the torrent of spending is all about politics: pre-election funding, the subtle pivot to a war economy, the deepening administrative (infrastructure and bureaucracy) and the welfare state.

Record Q2 spending bolstered the Q2 budget deficit and accounted for a direct 27.4% share of the Q2 GDP, the second largest in GDP’s history (as previously explained). (Figure 5, middle chart)

Since debt has financed the Marcos-nomics stimulus, the rising but flawed debt-to-GDP metrics should increase further. With it, the debt servicing-to-GDP ratio should also rise.

If anything, both debt-to-GDP and debt-servicing-to-GDP ratios have now exceeded pre-Asian crisis levels. (Figure 5, lowest image)

This signifies the primary reason why the BSP cut rates.

Its recourse to deficit spending means more debt, so the BSP must reduce its cost of servicing to allow for or accommodate more debt!

Anyway, according to the government officials, there is "Nothing to worry about PH debt." Debt won’t matter until it does. Alternatively, this could also mean "never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied." 

Furthermore, as with the pandemic template, liquidity injections should represent the third phase of the Marcos-nomics stimulus. 

Figure 6

The BSP's net claims on the Central Government (NCoCG) remain adrift at near record levels— indicating near-record holdings of government debt by the BSP. What tightening? Where? (Figure 6, topmost chart)

The all-time highs in public spending and bank lending should translate into HIGHER liquidity growth. The growth of BSP’s currency issuance has been accelerating since April 2024, rising by 7.4%—its highest since December 2022!

Should public spending, bank lending, and bank (NCoCG) fail to deliver the various government headline targets, expect the BSP's NCoCG to explode higher.

The fourth and final phase of the Marcos stimulus would involve expanding subsidies and widening the coverage of various relief measures for the banking system. 

Again, this would mirror the Pandemic Bailout Template 2.0. 

All these said, the rebound in liquidity growth should manifest in higher inflation and reinforce the uptrend of the USD-Philippine peso exchange rate. (Figure 6, middle and lowest graphs) 

Moreover, the Fed has long been used by the BSP as a pretext for keeping its stance, unfortunately, waiting for the FED seemed like "Waiting for Godot," so the BSP relented and eased ahead of the Fed.  This should provide further fuel to the bull market of the USDPHP over time. 

V. BSP Rate Cut Validates the Price Signals of the Philippine Treasury Market

Lastly, the BSP rate cuts validated the Philippine treasury markets.  

The curve’s transition from a steepening to a bullish flattening to an inversion in the belly (2-7 years yield) highlights disinflation, rising uncertainties and the growing slack in the real economy (rising risk of recession). 

Figure 7

The belly’s inversion only deepened right after the BSP’s rate cut (as of August 16th) 

And don’t just take it from me, a chart from the BSP’s 2023 Financial Stability Report expresses this. (p.13) 

VI. Summary and Conclusion: Watch for the Third and Fourth Phase of the Marcos-Stimulus (Pandemic Rescue Template 2.0) 

So, there you have it. 

Last week’s BSP rate cut validated our thesis of a "Marcos-nomics stimulus."

It represents the second phase of the tacit bailout of the deficit-spending-driven GDP, the banking system, and the firms of elites. The other objectives are the financing of the growing domain of various political agendas—mostly pre-election spending, the warfare state, infrastructure, and the bureaucratic state. 

One can expect the liquidity injections via the BSP and the banking system to account for the third phase of the stimulus program. 

To complete the fourth and final phase of the Pandemic Bailout Template 2.0, various subsidies and relief measures will be implemented to support the banking system. 

Despite the interim disinflation phase, the sustained bailout means the re-emergence of the third wave of inflation and the strengthening of the USD-Philippine peso bull market. 

The real tightening is about to come. 

Good luck to those who believe in the illusion that manipulated stock market pumps will translate into economic prosperity. 

___

References:

Prudent Investor, Bullseye! “Marcos-Nomics” Stimulus on a Roll as Q2 2024 Public Spending Hits All-Time High! BSP Rate Cuts Next? July 28,2024 

Other post on Marcos-nomics: 

Prudent Investor, Philippines' Q2 GDP Growth of 6.3%: Unpacking the "Marcos-nomics" Stimulus, June 2024 Philippine Employment Rates—A Statistical Pump August 11, 2024 

Prudent Investor, Marcos-nomics stimulus: Yields of the Philippine Treasury Curve Plunged, The Turbocharging of Pre-Election Liquidity Growth July 14, 2024 

Prudent Investor, Could the Philippine Government Implement a 'Marcosnomics' Stimulus Blending BSP Rate Cuts and Accelerated Deficit Spending? June 30, 2024