Saturday, February 21, 2009

Deglobalization and Economic Fascism

From a monetary policy induced globalization boom to a deglobalization bust, the global political economy is ostensibly undergoing a dramatic transformation.

According to the Economist (bold emphasis mine), ``THE economic meltdown has popularised a new term: deglobalisation. The process of the global integration of goods, capital and jobs is in trouble. The IMF predicts global growth of 0.5% this year, the worst in 60 years. World trade has plunged. Foreign direct investment, a common route to transfer skills and technology from rich to poor countries, fell by 21% in 2008 to $1.4 trillion and will contract by another 12-15% this year. Unemployment is expected to rise by 30m from 2007 levels by the end of this year. A poll taken in the last two months of 2008 by Edelman for the World Economic Forum found that 62% of repondents in 20 countries said they trusted companies less, with a majority keen on more state regulation.”

This trend towards more government, higher taxes and increased regulation or socialism is based on the belief of quick fixes. People are now invoking for a sacrifice of civil liberties for economic "salvation" based on serfdom.

And this had been foretold by Ludwig von Mises (Human Action), ``The boom produces impoverishment. But still more disastrous are its moral ravages. It makes people despondent and dispirited. The more optimistic they were under the illusory prosperity of the boom, the greater is their despair and their feeling of frustration. The individual is always ready to ascribe his good luck to his own efficiency and to take it as a well-deserved reward for his talent, application, and probity. But reverses of fortune he always charges to other people, and most of all to the absurdity of social and political institutions. He does not blame the authorities for having fostered the boom. He reviles them for the inevitable collapse. In the opinion of the public, more inflation and more credit expansion are the only remedy against the evils which inflation and credit expansion have brought about.”

This addiction to inflation is also equivalent to embracing economic fascism.

Professor Gary North in Economic Fascism And The Bailout Economy elaborates (bold highlight mine)…

``Liberals love to call conservatives fascists. The problem is, the liberals are right. Of course, well-informed conservatives like to call liberals fascists, and they are correct, too. Everyone who believes in the efficiency of the so-called government-business alliance is a fascist.

``The fascist State was always an attempt to control private industry by means of inflation, taxation, and regulation. Fascism was always a system of keeping the big boys alive and happy at the expense of the taxpayers. Of course, the faces changed. The system was always one gigantic system of cartels, regulation, and fiat money.

``The modern economic system is one gigantic interlocking system of promised bailouts, beginning with Social Security. In commerce, it is a system designed to keep large producers protected from consumers

But will a more socialistic form of government succeed in restoring economic growth?

``This economy will revive, but it will revive a new basis. It is no longer possible for someone who understands Austrian School economics to look at this economy as anything remotely resembling a free-market economy. At the very core of the free-market economy, as Mises said in 1912, is the monetary system. That system is now completely and openly run by a cartel that is now trapped by the Federal government. The Federal Reserve System is soon going to have to bail out the Federal government. The Federal government is bailing out the commercial banks, and if the Federal government cannot bail out the banks, the Federal Reserve has got to do it directly. In either case, the banks are busted…

``These scholars agree: we are seeing the bankruptcy of every Western government that has made too many big promises to too many voters regarding free healthcare and guaranteed retirement. All of it will collapse. The tatters of the promises will point to the tatters of those who made the promises -- politicians -- and the tatters of the system that supposedly was going to guarantee delivery of the promises.

``The academics still believe in the healing power of the State. The voters still believe this, too. But voters are catching on more rapidly than the academics that the State is running out of wiggle room. Millions of voters have figured out that they are going to get stiffed. They don't know what to do about it, but at least they understand that they really are going to get stiffed…

Yes, economic transformation will occur. However, economic realities will compel a reawakening of the people mesmerized by the delusion of prosperity based on policy based manipulation.

And how will this happen?

``We will have another round or two of centralized government, and probably more than one or two rounds of increased monetary expansion. But what we will not have is a restoration of anything resembling the financial world that existed prior to September 2008. That world is gone. The insiders will not get it back. They may get an imitation of it, based on fiat money that does not buy very much, but they will not see the world of 2007 restored. The power base of the modern fascist State is unraveling rapidly."

According to von Mises, ``The boom can last only as long as the credit expansion progresses at an ever-accelerated pace. The boom comes to an end as soon as additional quantities of fiduciary media are no longer thrown upon the loan market. But it could not last forever even if inflation and credit expansion were to go on endlessly. It would then encounter the barriers which prevent the boundless expansion of circulation credit. It would lead to the crack-up boom and the breakdown of the whole monetary system.”

In other words, repeated attempts to manipulate-the grandest experiment of all time-the fractional reserve paper money system will lead to a government debt bubble which may ultimately implode at the cost of the world’s monetary system.

Professor North’s suggested course of action…

``This is why it is important for you to preserve your assets by not believing the official assurances. Put your money where the experts tell you should not put your money. You should take your money out of those segments of the economy which the experts say you should put your money, and will soon boom. They have ignored the fact that the stock market has been a losing case since March of 2000. They would not admit it then; they will not admit it now. Anybody who bought and held a portfolio of indexed American stocks in March of 2000 has lost well over half of his money. Investors will learn, even though academic economists will not.”

The last word from von Mises, ``It is impossible to grasp the meaning of the idea of sound money if one does not realize that it was devised as an instrument for the protection of civil liberties against despotic inroads on the part of governments. Ideologically it belongs in the same class with political constitutions and bills of rights.”


Spending Trillions to Break the Barriers in Lending, Will it work?

Interesting article from the New York Times on the present crisis in the US,

The Present Dilemma (all bold highlights mine)…

``Largely hidden from view is a vast financial system that serves as the banker to the banks. And, like many lenders, this system is in deep trouble. The question is how to fix it.

``Most banks no longer hold the loans they make, content to collect interest until the debt comes due. Instead, the loans are bundled into securities that are sold to investors, a process known as securitization.

``But the securitization markets broke down last summer after investors suffered steep losses on these investments. So banks and other finance companies can no longer shift loans off their books easily, throttling their ability to lend.

``The result has been a drastic contraction of the amount of credit available throughout the economy. By one estimate, as much as $1.9 trillion of lending capacity — the rough equivalent of half of all the money borrowed by businesses and consumers in 2007, before the recession struck — has been sucked out of the system.

The Proposed Solution…

``The Obama administration hopes to jump-start this crucial machinery by effectively subsidizing the profits of big private investment firms in the bond markets. The Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve plan to spend as much as $1 trillion to provide low-cost loans and guarantees to hedge funds and private equity firms that buy securities backed by consumer and business loans.

``The Fed is expected to start the first phase of the program, which will provide $200 billion in loans to investors, in early March.

``But analysts question whether this approach will be enough to unlock the credit that the economy needs to pull out of a deepening recession. Some worry it may benefit only select investors at taxpayer expense.

``The program also does not try to change securitization practices that, many investors say, spread risks throughout the world and destroyed financial institutions. Policy makers acknowledge that for now, fixing credit ratings, reducing conflicts of interest and improving disclosure can wait.”

My comments:

-This exactly is how crony capitalism takes root. Political dispensation from economic rent results to skewed incentives and bureaucratic corruption even without the guaranteed normalization of the credit process. The end result would be more inefficiencies in the ecosystem.

-Spending $1 trillion to the US economy won’t be inflationary?

``The very high inflationary trend that the country has been experiencing in the recent years is a direct result of, among other factors, massive money printing to finance government expenditures and government deficits.

That’s the observation of Albert Makochekanwa of the Department of Economics of the University of Pretoria, South Africa on Zimbabwe’s hyperinflation model (as previously discussed in Will Debt Deflation Lead To A Deflationary Environment? and in Low Hyperinflation Risk For the US?).

In short, the restoration of the credit process isn't a sine qua non for inflation to be reignited, all it needs is massive money printing and subsequent government spending-the Dr. Gono approach. And Obama's policies seem to be taking us there.


Friday, February 20, 2009

31 Best Cities for Business Process Outsourcing Expansion

KPMG in a recent report, recommends 31 cities in key emerging markets that are most suited for IT and Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) expansions or in researchrecap.com's words, "leading pretenders to the BPO crown held by Bangalore, Chennai or Shanghai". Once the leading BPO centers reach a saturation point, these cities are likely to benefit from the opportunities of investment spillover.

The full list of highlighted destinations includes 10 locations in the Americas (Buenos Aires, Campinas, Curitiba, Calgary, Winnipeg, Santiago, Guadalajara, Queretaro, Boise, Indianapolis); 10 in Asia-Pacific (Brisbane, Changsha, Hangzhou, Ahmedabad, Jaipur, Nagpur, Penang, Davao City, Iloilo City, Ho Chi Minh City); and 11 in Europe, the Middle East and Africa (Sofia, Zagreb, Cairo, Port Louis, Belfast, Gdansk, Cluj-Napoca, Rostov-on-Don, Belgrade, Tunis and Lviv).

KPMG provides the best suited services for each city below.

In Europe Middle East and Africa...

North and South America...

In ASPAC or Asia, India, Japan and Australia...

In the Philippines, we are glad to know that two cities are in the list -Iloilo and Davao.

Nevertheless, there are other service aspects, such as research and development and engineering services, where investment coverage can be tapped or expanded.

Personally, I'm interested with or open to the research and development angle.


The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in pictures

The distribution breakdown of the ten year $787 billion American Recovery and Investment Act "stimulus" program...courtesy of Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Government Spending for 2009 (you can check the annual spending allocation for every year from 2010-2018 at the Fed Atlanta Blog)

The distribution share for the spending

And the relative size of spending per year.

Video Glenn Beck on Money Expansion: Inconvenient Debt

Fox News' Glenn Beck deals with money expansion.

Notable quotes from the video:

This is the hockey stick should take your breath away. This is devaluing our money....

Thomas Jefferson said "Doing this to our children is immoral" and I agree with him, we have pumped all of this money in and devalued our money, how is our money not going to be worthless?




Hat tip Jeff Tucker

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Inflationary Policies Drives China’s Shanghai Market; Clues of Reflexivity Theory at Work

This is an example of what I refer to as liquidity or inflationary policy driven and not earnings or economic driven markets.

From Bloomberg, (bold highlights mine)

``Chinese companies may be using record bank lending to invest in stocks, fueling a rally that’s made the benchmark Shanghai Composite Index the world’s best performer this year, according to Shenyin & Wanguo Securities Co.

``As much as 660 billion yuan ($97 billion) may have been converted by companies into term deposits or used to buy equities, Li Huiyong, Shanghai-based analyst at Shenyin Wanguo, said in a phone interview today, citing money supply figures.

``China’s banks lent a record 1.62 trillion yuan in January as part of a government drive to stimulate the world’s third- largest economy, while M2, the broadest measure of money supply, climbed 18.8 percent from a year earlier. The Shanghai Composite has surged 29 percent since the start of 2009, compared with a 10 percent decline in the MSCI World Index.

``“Part of the liquidity flowing into the stock market could be from companies using borrowed funds to invest in the stock market instead of working requirements,” said Li….

``Equity transactions rose last week to the highest in at least three years. The Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges handled a combined 32 billion shares Feb. 13, the most since Bloomberg started compiling the data in January 2006. An average of 17.3 billion shares have changed hands daily this year, compared with 9.8 billion shares in 2008…

``“Corporates are in need of working capital right now,” said Gondard, who helps oversee about $7.2 billion. “There may be exceptions, but it’s not big enough an impact to explain the rally.”

``China’s domestic stock market capitalization has increased by $743.1 billion since November, when the government announced its 4 trillion yuan stimulus plan.

``The rally has drawn more Chinese investors. About 224,000 accounts were opened to trade equities on the Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges last week, the fastest pace in almost two months. That’s still about a quarter of the record 1.07 million set up in the week to Sept. 7, 2007.”

Some may argue that this isn’t about the $580+ billion stimulus at all. This perspective sees only half of the picture.

There are two basic government policy measures: one is fiscal stimulus and the other is monetary stimulus.

Apparently, the Chinese government embarked on easing monetary policies since December of 2008.

From CCTV.com (all bold highlight mine),

``To begin with, China will implement a moderately easy monetary policy to promote reasonable growth in money supply and credit. It will also use various measures, including required reserves, interest rates and the exchange rate, to ensure an adequate supply of liquidity in the banking system. China will also add 100 billion yuan to the loan quota for policy banks by the end of the year.

``Meanwhile, local governments will be urged to inject money into credit guarantee firms and provide subsidies for them.

``More measures will be taken to stabilize stock markets and increase bond issuance. Infrastructure bonds in particular will be encouraged.

``Other moves include promoting insurance related to agriculture, the buying of houses and cars, healthcare and pensions. China will encourage insurance companies to invest in transport, communications, energy and other infrastructure projects.

``In addition, China will provide new financing channels, including loans for mergers and acquisitions, real estate investment trusts, private equity funds and private lending.

``Authorities will improve their management of foreign exchange to facilitate trade, while also upgrading its payments system. China will increase fiscal support to financial institutions to help tackle problems arising from non-performing loans.

``And finally, China will enhance the control of risk to ensure financial security.

The above chart shows how China has rapidly cut its interest rates.

And as the news account say, the recent rally in the Shanghai index may have been fueled by a surge in corporate bank lending which had been channeled into stocks. This signifies China's inflationary policies at its incipient phase of gaining traction.

And this is what we have been saying all along; the directives or thrusts to drag down rates below market levels compels the public to speculate or "hunt for yields".

In today’s environment where there is a marked downdraft in the real economy, long term investments are likely to be postponed until the inflationary policies succeeds to alter people’s outlook.

Look at this news from Shanghai Daily,

``FOREIGN direct investment in China tumbled 32.7 percent to US$7.54 billion in January year on year, the fourth straight monthly decline, as companies scaled back spending in the face of the international financial turmoil, the Ministry of Commerce said yesterday.”

Hence, the propensity to speculate has resulted to a sharp ascent of the Shanghai index over the past week, but had been equally met by a drastic decline of late.

Today, the Shanghai index was down by over 4% following yesterday’s 2.93%.

Skeptics have disparaged the recent the signs of recovery as some “false dawn”, where the 2 day slump have been quickly cheered as a reality check.

We aren’t convinced.

The Shanghai index has met some significant resistance at its 200—day moving averages (red line), which if it had succeeded to breakaway from, could have reinforced its progression to the advance phase.

However, what needs to be pointed out is that the Shanghai Index has been in an extremely overbought condition and deserves its much needed hiatus.

It could make another attempt for the 200-day moving average sometime in the near future after clearing its overbought state.

The furious pace of global central banks collectively printing money is bound to end up somewhere, and the above data serves only to validate this view.

Finally, markets aren't just about traditional economics or conventional finance. It is mostly about psychology or how government inflationary policies may trigger significant "reflexivity" in market psychology.

To quote anew the chief architect of the reflexivity theory, [The Alchemy of Finance p. 318], Mr. George Soros...

``The structure of events that have no thinking participants is simple: one fact follows another ending in an unending casual chain. The presence of thinking participants complicates the structure of events enormously: the participants thinking affects the course of action and the course of action affects the participants thinking. To make matters worst, participants influence and affect each other. If the participants’ thinking bore some determinate relationship to the facts there would be no problem: the scientific observer could ignore the participants’ thinking and focus on the facts. But the relationship cannot be accurately determined for the simple reason that the participants’ thinking does not relate to facts; it relates to events in which they participate, and these events become facts only after the participants’ thinking has made its impact on them. Thus the causal chain does not lead directly from fact to fact, but from fact to perception and from perception to fact with all kinds of additional connections between participants that are not reflected fully in the facts.

``How does this complex structure affect the ability of an observer to make valid statements about the course of events? His statements must also be more complex. In particular, they must allow for a fundamental difference between past and future: past events are a matter of record, while the future is inherently unpredictable. Explanation becomes easier than prediction.” (all emphasize mine)

The reflexivity theory applied to the Shanghai's index suggests that if the course of actions (inflationary policies) succeeds to alter participants thinking, then the subsequent changes in perception will ultimately be followed by changes in the facts.

Put differently, if the Shanghai Index's will continue to rally, it will be 'rationalized' by the public as a recovery (perception), when this is all about central banks' massive 'serial bubble blowing' inflation (fact).

Eventually when the perception of recovery is reinforced by economic data, (fact) the market trend deepens (perception).


Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Video: How Will A Dollar Crash Look Like?

A 1981 movie by Alan J. Pakula entitled Rollover depicted the fictional breakdown of the US dollar system.

Together with some great splices by George4title of the recent events which includes US Congressman Paul Kanjorski's narrative of the September 15th 2008 "electronic bank run" in C-Span, the simulated dollar crash scenario from the movie evokes an eerie and distressing vicarious sensation...


[Hat tip: Casey Research "The Room" and George4title]

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Fruits From Creative Destruction: An Asian and Emerging Market Decoupling?

``But innovation, in Schumpeter’s famous phrase, is also “creative destruction”. It makes obsolete yesterday’s capital equipment and capital investment. The more the economy progresses, the more capital formation will it therefore need. Thus, the classical economist-or the accountant or the stock exchange-considers “profit” is a genuine cost, the cost of staying in business, the cost of a future in which nothing is predictable except that today’s profitable business will become tomorrow’s white elephant.”- Peter F. Drucker, Profit’s Function, The Daily Drucker.

We read from creditwritedowns.com that Morgan Stanley Asia Chairman Stephen Roach made some predictions, namely:

1 “Asia will have a less acute impact from the global financial and economic crisis”

2. “Export-led regions are followers, not leaders.” Hence would recover after their main export markets, the US and Europe, recovered.

3. “The only possibility (to recover earlier) is China, as it has large infrastructure spending in place that could provide support for economic growth.”

Dr. Roach has been one of the unassuming well respected contrarian voices, whom I have followed, who sternly warned of this crisis.

Nonetheless while we agree with some of his prognosis, where we depart with Dr. Roach is on the aspect of a ‘belated recovery’ of Asia because of its “export dependence” on US and Europe.

Creative Destruction: The Telephone Destroyed The Telegraph

While it is true that the Asian model had functioned as an export-led region over the past years, our favorite cliché, ``Past performance does not guarantee future results” would possibly come into play in the transformation of the playing field.

Let us simplify, if a business paradigm doesn’t work do you insist on pursuing the same model or do you attempt a shift?

Marketing Guru Seth Godin has a terse but poignant depiction of “solving a different problem” response to our question. We quote the terrific guru Mr. Godin,

``The telephone destroyed the telegraph.

``Here's why people liked the telegraph: It was universal, inexpensive, asynchronous and it left a paper trail.

``The telephone offered not one of these four attributes. It was far from universal, and if someone didn't have a phone, you couldn't call them. It was expensive, even before someone called you. It was synchronous--if you weren't home, no call got made. And of course, there was no paper trail.

``If the telephone guys had set out to make something that did what the telegraph does, but better, they probably would have failed. Instead, they solved a different problem, in such an overwhelmingly useful way that they eliminated the feature set of the competition.” (bold highlight mine)

In short, we see human action basically at work. To quote Ludwig von Mises, ``Action is an attempt to substitute a more satisfactory state of affairs for a less satisfactory one. We call such a willfully induced alteration an exchange.”

People who relied on old models didn’t see this coming. They would have resisted until they were overwhelmed.

The fact is the telephone replaced an entrenched system. Joseph Schumpeter, in economic vernacular coined this as “creative destruction”. And creative destruction essentially leads to new operating environments: the rise of the telephone.

Similarly, the Asian export model has been built upon the US credit bubble structure. That bubble is presently deflating and would most possibly dissipate. So is it with Europe’s model.

In other words, the global economy’s trade and investment framework will probably reconfigure based on the present operating economic realities. Countries and regions would probably operate under a set of redefined roles.

Here are three clues of the possible creative destruction transformation.

Deepening Regionalism


Figure 3: ADB: Emerging Asian Regionalism

This from the ADB’s Emerging Asian Regionalism, ``In large part due to the growth of production networks just discussed, trade within Asia has increased from 37% of its total trade in 1986 to 52% in 2006 (Figure 3.3). The share of trade with Europe has risen somewhat, while that with the US and the rest of the world has fallen. As set out in Chapter 2, Asia’s intraregional trade share is now midway between Europe’s and North America’s. It is also higher than Europe’s was at the outset of its integration process in the early 1960s.

``But trade has not been diverted from the rest of the world. On the contrary, trade with each of Asia’s four main partner groups has increased in the last two decades—not just absolutely, but also relative to Asia’s GDP (Figure 3.4). For example, Asia’s trade with the EU has more than doubled as a share of its GDP, from 2.6% in 1986 to 6.0% in 2006. The increase is even larger as a share of the EU’s GDP. The aggregate trade data thus suggests that Asia is steadily integrating both regionally and globally.”

The fact is that Asia has steadily been regionalizing or developing its intraregional dynamics even when the bubble structure had been functional. Today’s imploding bubble isn’t likely to alter such deepening trend.

Moreover, the current unwinding bubble structure is emblematic of a discoordination process from a ‘market clearing’ environment.

Under this phase, spare capacities are being shut or sold, excess labor are being laid off, surplus inventories are being liquidated and losses are being realized. Essentially new players are taking over the affected industries. And new players will be coming in with fresh capital to replace those whom have lost. Fresh capital will come from those economies with large savings or unimpaired banking system (see Will Deglobalization Lead To Decoupling?)

And like any economic cycles, this adjustment process will lead to equilibrium. Eventually a trough will be reached, where demand and supply should balance out and a transition to recovery follows.

The post bubble structure is likely to reinforce and not reduce this intraregional dynamic.

So in contrast to the notion of a belated recovery in Asia hinged on the old decrepit model, a China recovery should lift the rest of Asia out of the doldrums.

Asia and not the old stewards should lead the recovery based on the new paradigm.

And in every new bullmarket there always has been a change in market leadership. We are probably witnessing the incipience of such change today.

Real Savings Function As Basic Consumption

The assumption of the intransigence of Asia as an export led model is predicated on Keynesian theory of aggregate demand. In essence, for as long as borrowing and lending won’t recover in the traditional ‘aggregate demand’ economies, there won’t be a recovery in export led economies.

But in contrast to such consensus view, demand is not our problem, production from savings is.

According to quote Dr. Frank Shostak, ``At any point in time, the amount of goods and services available are finite. This is not so with regard to people’s demand, which tends to be unlimited. Most people want as many things as they can think of. What thwarts their demand is the availability of means. Hence, there can never be a problem with demand as such, but with the means to accommodate demand.

``Moreover, no producer is preoccupied with demand in general, but rather with the demand for his particular goods.”

``In the real world, one has to become a producer before one can demand goods and services. It is necessary to produce some useful goods that can be exchanged for other goods.”

A sole shipwrecked survivor in an island will need to scour for food and water in order to consume. This means he/she can only consume from what can be produced (catch or harvest). It goes the same in a barter economy; a baker can only have his pair of shoes if he trades his spare breads with surplus of shoes made by the shoemaker.

Surplus bread or shoes or produce, thus, constitute as real savings. And to expand production, the shoemaker, the baker or even the shipwrecked survivor would need to invest their surpluses or savings to achieve more output which enables them to spend more in the future.

Instead of getting x amounts of coconuts required for daily nourishment, the shipwrecked survivor will acquire a week’s harvest and use his spare time to make a knife so he can either make ladder (to improve output), build a boat (to catch fish or to go home) or to hunt animals (to alter diet) or to make a shelter (for convenience). Essentially savings allows the survivor to improve on his/her living conditions.

To increase production for the goal of increasing future consumption, the savings of both the shoemaker and the baker would likely be invested in new equipment (capital goods).

Again to quote Dr. Shostak (bold highlight mine), ``What limits the production growth of goods and services is the introduction of better tools and machinery (i.e., capital goods), which raises worker productivity. Tools and machinery are not readily available; they must be made. In order to make them, people must allocate consumer goods and services that will sustain those individuals engaged in the production of tools and machinery.

``This allocation of consumer goods and services is what savings is all about. Note that savings become possible once some individuals have agreed to transfer some of their present goods to individuals that are engaged in the production of tools and machinery. Obviously, they do not transfer these goods for free, but in return for a greater quantity of goods in the future. According to Mises, "Production of goods ready for consumption requires the use of capital goods, that is, of tools and of half-finished material. Capital comes into existence by saving, i.e., temporary abstention from consumption.”

``Since saving enables the production of capital goods, saving is obviously at the heart of the economic growth that raises people's living standards. On this Mises wrote, “Saving and the resulting accumulation of capital goods are at the beginning of every attempt to improve the material condition of man; they are the foundation of human civilization.”

So what changes this primitive way of production-consumption to mainstream’s consumption-production framework?

The answer is debt. Debt can be used in productive or non-productive spending. But debt today is structured based on the modern central banking.

Think credit card. Credit card allows everyone to extend present consumption patterns by charging to future income. If debt is continually spent on non-productive items, it eventually chafes on one’s capacity to pay. It consumes equity. Eventually, overindulgence in non productive debt leads bankruptcy. And this epitomizes today’s crisis.

But debt issued from real savings can’t lead to massive clustering of errors (bubble burst) because they are limited and based on production surpluses. It is non productive debt issued from ‘something out of nothing’ or the fractional banking system combined with loose monetary policies from interest manipulations that skews the lending incentives and enables massive malinvestments.

To aptly quote Mr. Peter Schiff’s analysis of today’s crisis, ``Credit, whether securitized or not, cannot be created out of thin air. It only comes into existence though savings, which must be preceded by under-consumption. Since savings are scarce, any government guarantees toward consumer credit merely crowd out credit that might otherwise have been available to business. During the previous decade too much credit was extended to consumers and not enough to producers (securitization focused almost exclusively on consumer debt). The market is trying to correct this misallocation, but government policy is standing in the way. When consumers borrow and spend, society gains nothing. When producers borrow and invest, our capital stock is improved, and we all benefit from the increased productivity.”

Now if capital comes into existence by virtue of savings, we should ask where most of the savings are located?

The answer is in Asia and emerging markets.

Figure 4: Matthews Asian Fund: Asia Insight

According to Winnie Puah of Matthews Asia, ``The economic potential and impact of Asian savings have yet to be fully unleashed at home. Indeed, Asia’s excess savings fuelled the recent boom in U.S. consumption and housing markets. Creating a consumption boom in Asia would mean that Asia needs to borrow and spend more. To date, governments are supporting domestic demand with fiscal stimulus packages—but it is household balance sheets that hold the key to developing a consumer culture. Overall, Asian households are well-positioned to increase spending—most have low debt levels and high rates of savings… there is a noticeable divergence in saving patterns between emerging and mature economies over the past decade, particularly since Asia learned a hard lesson from being overleveraged during the Asian financial crisis. Today, most Asian households save 10%—30% of their disposable incomes. China’s households, for example, have over US$3 trillion in savings deposits but have borrowed only US$500 billion.”

Thus I wouldn’t underestimate the power of Asia’s savings that could be converted or transformed into spending.

Asia’s Tsunami of Middle Class Consumers

In my August 2008 article Decoupling Recoupling Debate As A Religion, we noted of the theory called as the “Acceleration Phenomenon” developed by French economist Aftalion, who propounded that a marginal increase in the income distribution of heavily populated countries as China, based on a Gaussian pattern, can potentially unleash a torrent of middle class consumers.

Apparently, the Economist recently published a similar but improvised version of the Acceleration Phenomenon model. And based on this, the Economist says that 57% of the world population is now living in middle class standards (see figure 5)!


Figure 5: The Economist: The Rise of the Middle Class?

From The Economist (bold highlights mine), ``In practice, emerging markets may be said to have two middle classes. One consists of those who are middle class by any standard—ie, with an income between the average Brazilian and Italian. This group has the makings of a global class whose members have as much in common with each other as with the poor in their own countries. It is growing fast, but still makes up only a tenth of the developing world. You could call it the global middle class.

``The other, more numerous, group consists of those who are middle-class by the standards of the developing world but not the rich one. Some time in the past year or two, for the first time in history, they became a majority of the developing world’s population: their share of the total rose from one-third in 1990 to 49% in 2005. Call it the developing middle class.

``Using a somewhat different definition—those earning $10-100 a day, including in rich countries—an Indian economist, Surjit Bhalla, also found that the middle class’s share of the whole world’s population rose from one-third to over half (57%) between 1990 and 2006. He argues that this is the third middle-class surge since 1800. The first occurred in the 19th century with the creation of the first mass middle class in western Europe. The second, mainly in Western countries, occurred during the baby boom (1950-1980). The current, third one is happening almost entirely in emerging countries. According to Mr Bhalla’s calculations, the number of middle-class people in Asia has overtaken the number in the West for the first time since 1700.”

So apparently, today’s phenomenon seems strikingly similar to Seth Godin’s description of the creative destruction of the telegraph.

The seeds of the rising middle class appear to emanate from the wealth transfer from the developed Western economies to Asia and emerging markets. Put differently, Asia and EM economies could be the fruits from the recent ‘creative destruction’.

Some Emerging Signs?

However, there are always two sides to a coin.

For some, the present crisis signify as a potential regression of these resurgent middle class to their poverty stricken state, as the major economies slumps and drag the entire world into a vortex.

For us, substantial savings or capital (the key to consumption), deepening regionalism, underutilized or untapped credit facilities, rapidly developing financial markets, a huge middle class, unimpaired banking system, and most importantly policies dedicated to economic freedom serve as the proverbial line etched in the sand.

One might add that the negative interest rates or low interest policies and the spillage effect from stimulus programs from developed economies appear to percolate into the financial systems of Asia and emerging markets.

Although these are inherently long term trends, we sense some emergent short term signs which may corroborate this view:

1. Despite the 30% slump in the global Mergers and Acquisitions in 2008, China recorded a 44% jump to $159 billion mostly to foreign telecommunication and foreign parts makers (Korea Times). Japan M&A soared last year to a record $165 billion in 2008 a 13% increase (Bloomberg).

2. Credit environment seems to be easing substantially.

According to FinanceAsia (Bold highlights), ``The fallout from Japan's banking crisis offers clues to how the current situation may resolve itself. Back then, healing started first in the areas that had been most affected -- interbank lending recovered earliest, followed by credit markets, volatility markets and finally, many years later, equity markets.

``In today's crisis, interbank lending is already starting to recover. The spread between three-month interbank lending rates and overnight rates, which provides a key measure of the health of credit markets, has dropped significantly from its peak of 364bp in early 2008 down to less than 100bp today. As the interbank market recovers, credit should be next to heal.

``However, at the moment, triple-B spreads are at their highest levels in more than 100 years, which makes credit look like an extremely attractive investment opportunity. And there is every reason to expect that Asian corporates will participate in the healing, perhaps even as quickly as their counterparts in the US. (Oops and I thought everyone said divergence wasn’t possible or decoupling is a myth)

3. Asian companies have begun to engage in debt buyback. Again from FinanceAsia, ``Asian companies are buying back their debt with gusto and this could be a sign that credit markets are on the mend, according to Morgan Stanley.

``Asian companies are betting that credit will offer the best returns in 2009 and, like the smart traders they are, executives in the region are busy buying back their debt with gusto.

4. A picture speaks a thousand words…


Figure 6: A BRIC Decoupling?

China and Brazil appear to be leading the BRIC recovery while India (BSE) and Russia (RTS) seem to initiating their own.

For financial markets of developed economies, don’t speak of bad words.




The Tenuous Correlation of Remittances and the Philippine Peso

``Whether we like it or not, it is a fact that economics cannot remain an esoteric branch of knowledge accessible only to small groups of scholars and specialists. Economics deals with society's fundamental problems; it concerns everyone and belongs to all. It is the main and proper study of every citizen." Ludwig von Mises, Human Action The Place of Economics in Learning

Recently an amusing article in a local business broadsheet predicted that the Peso will likely fall to Php 52 against the US dollar at the end of the year. The article anchored its prediction from the analysis of a prominent economist, whose assessment was rooted on “remittances”.

Simplistic Analysis Equals Misdiagnosis

I say it is “amusing” because journalistic reporting projects the operational nature of the marketplace as seemingly so simplistic. The Peso’s path is deterministically portrayed as one dimensional. It assumes that “remittances” which only account for 11% of our GDP as the most powerful driver (survivorship bias-focusing on the popular or winners at the expense of the rest) and further assumes that its “pair”, the US dollar, is a fixed or non-dynamic state (selective perception bias).

Importantly, as Nassim Taleb of the Black Swan fame wrote in Fooled by Randomness, ``The problem with information is not that it is diverting and generally useless, but that it is toxic”. (bold highlight mine)

And as the public gets flimflammed over the perceived linearity of the causal relationship, they develop false impressions or notions that “simplistic” markets can ultimately be tamed or mastered by the state. And this applies to everything else. Think rice, meat, LPG and etc….

And this is why local media never fail to impress upon the public of the significance of government control over prices, which almost always don’t work.

What is Popular Isn’t Necessarily Economically Viable

The fact that prices, through money, exists is a manifestation of scarcity. And money functions as the medium of exchange meant to bridge on such deficiencies.

For example, if you have pizzas and I have beers, then we can make a trade. How many pizzas in exchange for beers will be determined by our relative values, i.e. how much a pizza is worth to me and how much a beer is worth to you. And where our relative values meet, these allow us then to conduct such exchange. You have (x quantity) beers and I have (y quantity) of pizza. Thus, we are both satisfied.

That’s because pizzas and beers are scarce goods. And exchanges of scarce goods or service are the natural state of the markets. Hence, satisfaction is derived by voluntary exchange. Alternatively this means, in a world of abundance, ipso facto, we don’t need money (markets or prices at all).

And where the allocations of scarce resources are implemented by the state, in order to attain efficiency requires the comprehensive and foolproof understanding of (marginal utility) the values or priorities of each individual within its constituency (e.g. the number of pizzas or beers you and I would have for a day, month or year) and the perfect assessment of the balance of supply and demand.

In short, this essentially requires omniscience- a trait only attributable to God.

Going back to our example; if the government ascertains a fixed rate of exchange for pizzas against beers and vice versa, which goes against the perceived pleasure or benefits of the producers, then the tendency is to produce less (quantity) and or inferior (quality) products. The end result is product shortages, black markets, higher prices and dissatisfied consumers.

Yet, the purported government predominance over the marketplace signifies nothing less than a GRAND DELUSION constantly peddled and perpetuated by politicians, so called economic “experts” and mainstream media used to gain mileage for tacit political or financial agenda.

Rationalization Meant For Political Agenda

Going back to the Peso, we’ve long been a skeptic over the Peso-remittance connections, as we wrote years ago in Philippine Peso And Remittances: The Unsecured Knot or What Media Didn’t Tell About the Peso, where experts have incessantly broached the causal relationship of the advancing Peso with remittance trends.

And as we earlier noted, while economic experts boisterously bruit about the multiplier impact of remittance growth to Philippine consumption, none of these experts or even the local authorities have given an estimate of the presumed multiplier or how much of local consumption has been captured by remittances.

Yet, this is the reason why populist “Keynesian” experts continue to blazon on a “depreciating Peso” as a virtue, which means printing of more money, bigger government, more redistributive policies from the productive and competent sectors to the non productive incompetent sectors and a rent seeking and dependency culture which ultimately leads to higher prices and more (not less) poverty. Nonetheless, if currency depreciation is a virtuous act then Zimbabwe should be the world’s richest country today.

One must be reminded that misdiagnosis extrapolates to false prescriptions.

On the other hand, the same school of thought disingenuously lambastes or assails on corruption as the principal and proximate cause of our miseries. Yet none of them have the audacity to decry the association between how CORRUPTION is correlated to BIG government. And this concerns NOT just the bureaucratic nightmare but also government spending and general economic intervention.

The silence is deafening. Naturally, an enlightened and empowered public could strip away their authority or means of control over the populace. Hence, self interest calls for looking at superficial measures as diversion than dealing with harsh cold reality.

What Peso-Remittance Relevance? Where?

It is hard NOT to associate the markets with political correctness as markets always function as the political scapegoat for government failures. Nonetheless it is ironic how these self-righteous all knowing pretentious experts claim to have the right solutions to deal exactly with our economic plight when they can’t even predict markets accurately in both short or long term basis.

Remember, markets function as signals to allocate the basic economic forces of demand and supply. This means that if they can’t read markets correctly, what additional qualifications have they to know the degree of distinctive individual values required to allocate resource efficiently? Mathematical models based on classroom conditions?

So under the remittances driven Peso concept, the reasoning or logic goes- growing remittances equals a stronger Peso. Inversely, negative remittances equal to a weaker Peso.

Here are the facts: The Peso in 2008 fell 15% even as remittance growth accounted for 15% for the first 11 months according to the IHT (estimated by World Bank to account for 18% growth for 2008). Growing remittances against a falling Peso, so how valid is this concept?

More Proof of inconsistencies?

Despite the present deterioration in macro economic conditions, World Bank estimates growth trends of remittances will decelerate and NOT grow negative see figure 1 (left window-gray line). However, the growth clip of East Asia and Pacific remittance trends have been on a decline since 2006. Yet when looking at Philippine economic growth composition (right window) where the services industry has allegedly been the primary beneficiary of remittances, services growth continue to surge in 2007 amidst a declining rate of growth in remittances. The services industry only began to moderate in the last 2 quarters of 2008. A case of lagged effect perhaps?

So, if the Peso should reflect the relative health of its economy with its comparable pair, then I am lost in ascertaining the said “steamy” correlations between remittance growth and the service industry.

Figure 2: Danske Bank: Emerging Market Currencies Monthly Performance

In addition, since remittance trends could grind to a halt or even go negative, why does it seem that the Peso is consolidating if not appreciating (see figure 2) than declining? Has the currency markets been “discounting” the remittance factor?

Of course one may argue that it is still 10 months away from the day of reckoning.

But with some credit indicators materially manifesting easing conditions, some markets have begun to reflect these conditions. Again as shown above Asian currencies appear to be outperforming the other emerging market counterparts. Again further signs of brewing divergences.

Could it be that this isn’t mainly about remittances, or to include about trade account, but one from the diminishing impact of forcible selling in the developed world? Or could this possibly imply that the “spillage effect”, from nearly concerted inflationary policies abroad, may have began regain some traction in pockets of the economy? Or perhaps a combination of both?

If I would apply Winston Churchill’s ``Out of intense complexities, intense simplicities emerge" or adopt Occam Razor’s principle, ``one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything” then I would have to say that the state of relative capital (accumulation or consumption) conditions will determine the fate of the currency.

This includes remittances, net trade and portfolio/investment flows- all of which constitutes the Balance of Payment (BoP), combined with forward contracts, derivatives, evolving economic and fiscal policies, the economy’s capital and production structure, national government and central bank balance sheets- all of which likewise contributes to the health of the domestic currency at varying degrees, dependent on the flux of the political economy.

In today financial crisis prompted global recession, the burden could possibly to shift to the extent of the degree of deployment of government resources to “fix” or “cushion” the economy. This means that relative accessibility of liquidity flows and inflationary policies could weigh more on currency values than the traditional metrics.

None of these suggests, however, that we are in denial of the incremental deepening of correlations between the price value of the Peso relative to remittances, and correspondingly, the latter’s intensifying role to the nation’s economic pie overtime.

Where we depart from the mainstream is the apparent patent overplaying of the causality of the said trends relative to the value of the Peso.

Nonetheless, such dramatization by the spinmeisters, as pointed earlier, has been vested with political-financial dimensions. Why? Because of the salability of the concept, which could translate to future votes, justification for bigger government spending on programs aimed to “benefit” the 11% of the GDP sector (against the 89%) or a wider audience for commercial gains.

The irony is that people always claim that they are after the truth, but the sordid reality is that instead of using economic common sense, they NOT only buy into rubbish information but the toxicity of politically slanted “expert” opinion as their version of facts, reality or truth.

Julius Caesar was right, ``People readily believe what they want to believe".


Saturday, February 14, 2009

Not All Aaa Credit Ratings Are Cut From The Same Cloth

Faced with today's financial hurricane, credit ratings agency Moody's announced how it ascertians risks conditions that may impact Aaa sovereign debt ratings of developed economies.

Researchrecap quotes Moody's, ``For a Aaa government to be downgraded, Moody’s must have concluded that the deterioration in credit metrics is (1) observable and material in absolute terms; (2) observable and material in relative terms; and (3) unlikely to be reversed in the near future,” Moody’s says. “The decision underlying a potential downgrade would also depend on the extent of the actual and potential deterioration of a government’s balance sheet; whether a country’s economic model can be regenerated, thereby allowing the economy to rebound; and whether governments can repair their fiscal position by raising taxes or cutting expenditure.”


graph from Moody's

So from the said conditions Moody's categorizes them into three groups:

1. Resistant Aaa countries, such as Germany, whose rating is so far largely untested despite strong headwinds;

my comment:

Germany, France, Austria and Switzerland are rated higher than the US or UK even if they are all Aaa.

2. Resilient Aaa countries, such as the UK and the US, whose ratings are being tested but, in our view, display sufficient capacity to grow out of their debt and repair the damage;

my comment:

Moody's is being too optimistic. Once the latest stimulus measures fail to achieve its objectives, we will probably see more of the same efforts.

And additional government resources thrown to resuscitate the economy may constrain strained economic resources which may eventually risk jeopardizing the present ratings standing.

Remember, during the credit bubble days, Moody's was instrumental in providing Aaa ratings to obscure structured finance products, which eventually turned out to be "toxic" and which remains a key burden to the banking system's seeming inextricable balance sheets.

3. Vulnerable Aaa countries (Ireland and, to a lesser extent, Spain) who face equally stern challenges and whose rating will depend on their ability to rapidly regenerate their economies. Indeed, in the case of Ireland, Moody’s placed its Aaa rating on negative outlook on 29 January 2009.

my comment:

Aaa ratings like ALL government guarantees are never risk free.

Besides, grading sovereign papers isn't entirely about finance or economics but likewise subject to political impediments or possibly conflict of interest issues.

Perhaps we will see some material downgrades among some of these Aaa sovereigns as the crisis reach maturity.

(Source Research Recap )