Ignorance is a primary fuel of nationalism and aggression. Patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrel, as Dr . Johnson observed, and the first platform of fools.Three professors from Princeton, Dartmouth and Harvard University just did a poll that found only 16% of Americans queried could find Ukraine on the world map. Actually, that’s better than I expected, given American’s notorious geographical illiteracy. Seeing Ukraine’s map on TV every night no doubt helped.Worryingly, but hardly surprisingly, the poll also found that the further a poll respondent thought Ukraine was from its real location, the more likely he was to support US military intervention in Ukraine. Few Americans could find Iraq (Eye-raq to most), Afghanistan, or Iran (Eye-ran) on the map.“Let’s get those dirty Commies,” goes the latest wave of war fever to sweep the US, “if we can only find them!” Some respondents put Ukraine in Australia, or South America…War fever feeds on ignorance. If mobs in Paris had known in August, 1914, that they would die on the mud of Flanders few would have been so eager for war. All sides in World War One mistakenly believed in a short, sweet military victory. The great French voice against the folly of war, Jean Juares, was assassinated by nationalists.“The proportion of collage grads who could correctly identify Ukraine (20%) is only slightly higher than the proportion of Americans who told Pew (the respected polling outfit) that President Obama was Muslim in August, 2010,” found the Ivy League professors.About the same percentage of Americans believe that Elvis is still alive, or that an Islamic Caliphate will shortly rule America. Ever since the Bush administration, stupidity and ignorance have become fashionable.
This is from historian Eric Margolis—commenting on the controversial poll published at the Washington Post Blog, where the less Americans know about Ukraine’s location, the greater the desire to intervene—at the LewRockwell.com.
I find the observation of the relationship between ignorance (which should not be limited to geography) and militancy highly relevant. And this applies everywhere, not just to American's perception to the Ukraine geopolitcal conundrum.
I’ve noticed that for the many who agitate and pine for war are mostly those with hardly any inkling of war’s horrors. Their conception of war seem to emanate from the movies or shows they’ve watched or from games that they have played—as third party or from the audience perspective. They perhaps expect somebody to do the fighting for and in behalf of them, while like in sport games, they cheer from the sidelines. They hardly seem to grasp that in war, the lives of their treasured family, relatives, friends or their neighbors may be at stake while their homes devastated and ravaged. They also seem to see wars as cost—free (I mean economic aside from social costs).
And mostly the same group usually serve as unwitting instruments or mouthpieces of the major beneficiaries of war: the political class—who pitch the war fever amplified by media to gain popularity via the herding effect to justify the imposition of taxes, inflationism and economic repression in order to expand their control over society and their resources. Wars after all are not only about politics, but about business too.
So the other beneficiaries or the cohorts of the political class are the defense industry and their financiers aside from mainstream media. And all it takes to push for war is to rile up on the emotions of the unthinking electorates. As a saying goes, if all you have is a (emotional) hammer, everything looks like a nail.
No comments:
Post a Comment