Will this Week Highlight the Climax for the Euro Debt Crisis?

Will the Euro debt crisis see its climax this week? The head of the Eurogroup Jean Juncker thinks so…

From Marketwatch.com

The head of the Eurogroup, Jean-Claude Juncker, said the countries sharing the common currency, their rescue fund and the European Central Bank will soon act to save the euro, according to a pre-release of an interview to be published Monday by Sueddeutsche Zeitung.

"We will decide in the coming days which measures to take," Mr. Juncker is quoted as saying.

Mr. Juncker indicated the European Financial Stability Fund and the ECB will buy Spanish government debt to bring down yields after a summit of euro-zone leaders in late June had paved the way for sovereign-bond purchases by the bailout fund.

"I have no doubt that we will implement the decisions of the last summit," Mr. Juncker said, according to the newspaper.

His statements seem to be the first official confirmation of media reports that European leaders are drawing up a plan of purchases of Spanish and Italian government debt by the ECB and the rescue fund.

"The euro countries have reached a point at which we have to make clear with all available means that we are strongly determined to ensure the financial stability of the currency union," the German daily quotes him as saying.

"The world is talking about whether the euro zone will still exist in a few months," Mr. Juncker said, according to Sueddeutsche Zeitung.

Despite a gamut of bailouts, Euro’s debt crisis has lingered since 2008 and have been worsening,

The belief that a political solution will arrest the crisis, like in the recent past, will likely be just another delaying the day of reckoning, that would go against the central designs of the political masters—Messrs. Junker, Draghi, Hollande, Ms. Merkel and the rest, and this includes team Ben Bernanke of the US Federal Reserve, whom has been working closely with the ECB—to prop up the unsustainable political welfare-crony system.

But of course, real actions from central banks will have real effects in the marketplace and in the economy. And this is why the details of what they will do will greatly matter.

Global financial markets have priced in heavily the expectations of the coming massive bailout by the ECB.

So political actions will have to deal first with the market’s expectations. The failure of which may result to the magnified market tremors which could swiftly eviscerate gains we have seen in the recent days.

Next, financial markets have become extremely complacent and heavily dependent on steroids. Bad new has been interpreted as good news.

Growing signs of political desperation by Euro officials have only reinforced the market’s HOPE of a political fix from political narcotism (inflationism) even when unfolding events keeps us telling us the opposite.

Financial markets have been reduced to a branch of a grand casino according to ex-US President Reagan’s former budget director David Stockman

Not only will this mean sustained volatility of market pricing—out of the repeated price distortions from widespread interventions—such complacency amplifies the fat tail risks (or a market crash). Of course I hope that this won’t happen.But the risk environment or conditions says that this is a possibility.

But hope would not serve as a better guide for prudent investors, instead, we should prepare for the worst while hope for the best

Be very careful out there.

Bear Market in Commodities Isn’t Bullish for Stocks

The Bloomberg reports that commodities have entered a bear market, (bold emphasis mine)

Commodities tumbled into a bear market as U.S. reports on manufacturing, jobless claims and home sales signaled a faltering economy after the Federal Reserve refrained from announcing another round of stimulus.

The Standard & Poor’s GSCI Spot Index of 24 raw materials fell 2.8 percent to settle at 559 at 3:56 p.m. New York time. The gauge has dropped 22 percent from this year’s highest close of 715.52 on Feb. 24, entering a bear market. Earlier, the measure touched 558.14, the lowest since November 2010. Metals and energy led today’s slump.

Manufacturing in the Philadelphia region contracted in June at the fastest pace in almost a year. Existing U.S. home sales fell more than forecast by analysts, and jobless claims topped estimates. Yesterday, the Fed, led by Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, reduced its 2012 forecast for economic growth, and policy makers decided against a third round of debt purchases.

“We got nothing significant from Bernanke, and data continues to paint a horrible picture,” said Steve Mathews, the chief investment officer of Flintlock Capital Asset Management LLC in New York, which manages $105 million of assets. “We have to wait until the next Bernanke event to know if the Fed will indeed do something to perk the economy.”

The GSCI index surged 92 percent from the end of December 2008 to June 2011 as the Fed kept borrowing costs at a record low and bought $2.3 trillion of debt in two rounds of so-called quantitative easing.

Let me put the the news into the proper perspective. Slackening economic developments in the US only aggravates the already existing weak conditions around the world.

As pointed out earlier, China’s markets continue to tumble on fresh accounts of sluggish manufacturing. This in spite of the recent tepid inflationist policies in ‘support’ of China’s economy (it’s really not the economy but the cronies).

Bear market in commodity prices (GTX) has more been consistent with actions of China’s Shanghai index (SSEC) than the US S&P 500 (SPX).

Add to the mix the Euro crisis, dwindling growth of emerging markets and most importantly, the seemingly irresolute or halfhearted central bankers, such as the US Federal Reserve’s miserly extension of Operation Twist, who may be tacitly wishing for a crash to justify their interventions, you’ve got a recipe for a reversal in expectations.

A reversal in expectations will mean bad news IS bad news.

Let me repeat what I have been warning about and what I said yesterday,

If GLOBAL political agents will continue to withhold steroids from the steroid-starved or stimulus-addicted financial markets, expectations will likely reverse soon.

And that reversal could be swift, deep and dramatically violent.

“We got nothing significant from Bernanke” are signs of growing demand for REAL actions and increasing frustrations with current set of political actions. The allure of promises appears to be fading.

This also implies of the possible inflection of market’s expectations on mere pledges and guarantees.

So seen from both the dimensions of consumption or from monetary inflation, a bear market in commodities cannot be bullish on (steroid dependent) global equities (including the Phisix).

Be very careful out there.

Bad News Is Good News: Global Markets Rise on MORE Stimulus Expectations

Bad New is Good News.

Global markets continue to ascend on EXPECTATIONS of MORE bailouts. [yes markets have been enchanted by the Bernanke Put- pattern of providing ample liquidity to protect the asset markets]

From the Bloomberg,

U.S. stocks advanced, sending the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index to the highest level in more than a month, as investors speculated the Federal Reserve will announce more measures to stimulate the world’s largest economy…

Signs of slowing growth amid Europe’s turmoil could mean the Fed, which began a two-day meeting today, could extend its so-called Operation Twist, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Jefferies & Co. The program involves selling short-term debt and buying longer-term bonds. A more aggressive response could be warranted if the Fed see high costs in a slowdown of growth.

Fed’s Options

The central bank may expand its balance sheet, extend Operation Twist and/or lengthen its short-term interest rate guidance beyond late 2014, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. chief economist Jan Hatzius wrote today.

“A decision not to ease is tantamount to a tightening,” he wrote in an e-mailed report to clients today. “At this point we’d be quite surprised if we saw no easing.”

Expectations for further policy action gave stocks their first back-to-back weekly gain since April on June 15. The S&P 500 earlier this month was on the brink of a so-called correction, or a 10 percent drop from a recent peak, on concern about a global slowdown and a worsening of Europe’s crisis.

Markets have constantly been fed with the forging of new deals and from vows of a backstop from policymakers to mitigate or curb the crisis.

The US Federal Reserve’s FOMC concludes their periodical meeting today and will be announcing their actions.

As pointed out above, the markets have already been pricing in, or have been frontrunning, a supposed new easing program from the FED.

Earlier, emerging markets including the Philippines through the IMF, has also promised contributions to assist in the rescue of Europe’s political and banking class. This serves as an example of the ‘poor’ (Filipino and EM Taxpayers) rescuing the rich.

Now the it’s the G-20’s turn to make the next round of pledges.

From another Bloomberg report,

Euro-area leaders at the Group of 20 summit pledged to “take all necessary policy measures” to defend the currency union and boost protection of the region’s struggling banks, according to the final statement issued at a meeting in Mexico.

With contagion from the debt crisis rippling through the world economy, participants at the G-20 summit in the beach resort of Los Cabos backed measures to spur growth and cut budgets in Europe while saying the U.S. will “calibrate” the pace of its spending cuts to avoid a “sharp fiscal contraction” in 2013.

At the end of the two-day summit, the leaders of advanced and emerging economies said Europe is taking steps toward closer economic union “that lead to sustainable borrowing costs.” The G-20 also backed Europe’s plans to move toward a more integrated banking industry.

Talks among G-20 leaders at Los Cabos were dominated by the crisis in 17-nation euro region and its threat to the world economy. Bond yields in Spain, the region’s fourth-biggest economy, rose to a euro-era record yesterday, above the 7 percent level that led to bailouts in Greece, Ireland and Portugal.

The group welcomed the plan to rescue Spain’s banks and the European Union’s efforts to build up its crisis defenses, including the European Stability Mechanism, the region’s permanent bailout fund scheduled to start up in July.

Pledges upon pledges upon pledges.

Again market dynamic becomes a question of the FULFILLMENT or NON-FULFILLMENT of such expectations. Eventually markets will DEMAND not merely promises or assurances but ACTION.

Oh by the way, technician Carl Swenlin, at the stockcharts.com Blog says that the markets deserve a cautious stance, than blindly fixating on the bullish reverse head and shoulders pattern

My problem is that, being a person who likes things to be nice and neat, I wanted the right shoulder to be more even with the left shoulder. But no. What we have is a formation that is very lopsided, but I think it is close enough to be considered a completed reverse head and shoulders pattern. The neckline has been penetrated, so the minimum upside target is about 1430.

Unfortunately, the bullish breakout on the price chart is contradicted by the Climactic Volume Indicator (CVI) chart, which spiked to a level that usually signals a short-term top.

Conclusion: It is possible that Saturday's upcoming elections in Greece may have triggered some short-covering ahead of the weekend, resulting in a rally that may prove to have no legs. The breakout is far from decisive, and the CVI indicates a possible exhaustion climax, so I remain skeptical of the rally.

A REVERSAL of markets expectations, which may be prompted for by the diminishing returns from guarantees and or from dissatisfaction from political actions, can be swift, dramatically violent and nasty.

Be very careful out there.

Promises of Bailouts: How Sustainable will Positive Market Expectations Be?

The following news account[1] from the Bloomberg on Friday’s discernible jump in the US equity markets reasonably encapsulates what has been driving the global markets for a long time—financial markets highly dependent on political actions.

U.S. stocks advanced, giving the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index its longest streak of weekly gains since February, amid speculation of an agreement to contain Europe’s debt crisis and further Federal Reserve stimulus.

How Strong will the Market’s Expectations be?

So let me play the devil’s advocate: what if the market’s deepening expectations of the political resolutions from the above predicaments does not materialize?

These may come in many forms:

-adapted political actions may be inadequate to satisfy the market’s expectations (possibly from divergences in commitments or the inability to ascertain the optimal adjustments required)

-expected political actions don’t take place (possibly due to schisms or continuing disagreements over the measures or dissensions over the enforceability, degree of participations and or divisions over the efficacy of proposed measures)

-the festering crisis unravels faster than the applied political measures (possibly from miscalculations by the political authorities on the scale of the crisis or from unintended effects of their actions)

-sanguine markets expectations for an immediate resolution erode from either procrastination or persistent irresolution or indecisions (possibly from a combination of the above factors—divergences in calculations, variances in tolerable commitments and doubts on enforcement procedures and dissimilar political interests in dealing with the above junctures or more…)

October 1987 Risk Paradigm

I am in the camp that says that current dynamics suggest that the risks of a US are not as material as many mainstream experts have been projecting. Most of their projections have political implications, the desire for more government interventions.

But there could be a marked difference; stock markets may not be reflective of the actual developments in the real economy. In other words, actions in the stock market may depart from the economy.

Has there been an instance where there had been an adverse reaction to the stock markets from unfulfilled expectations from policymakers which had not been reflected on the economy?

Yes, the global stock market crash of October 19, 1987.

From the US Federal Reserve of Boston[2],

While in hindsight the data provide no evidence that interventions in foreign exchange markets were used to signal policy changes, it is possible that, at the time, market participants interpreted interventions as signals of future policy. If so, significant movements in the exchange rate would be expected at the time of interventions. Central banks actively intervened in foreign exchange markets after the Plaza Accord. Evidence suggests that combined interventions to increase the value of the dollar during this period did result in a significant decline in the deutsche mark/dollar exchange rate. As it became apparent that intervention was not signalling monetary policy changes, market participants apparently stopped interpreting intervention as a signal.

In short, market expectations diverged from the results intended from such political actions.

Many tenuous reasons have been imputed on non-recession stock market crash of 1987. However, the major pillar to this infamous event has been the boom policies of the Plaza Accord of 1985[3] which had been meant to depreciate the US dollar against G-7 economies via coordinated foreign exchange interventions, and the subsequent Louvre Accord of 1987[4], which had been aimed at arresting the decline of the US dollar or the reversal of the policies of Plaza Accord.

What had been initially perceived by policymakers as a US dollar problem, emanating from the advent of globalization, technological advances and the gradual transitory recovery of major Western from the recession of the early 80s, which affected the ‘goods’ side of the global economy, and the increasing financial globalization of the US dollar from the hyperinflationary episodes of some emerging markets (e.g. Latin American Debt Crisis[5]) which affected the ‘money’ side of the global economy, essentially transformed into a problem of policy coordination of interest rates[6] that led to an abrupt tightening of previously loose monetary policies which eventually got vented on global stock markets.

The decline of the trade weighted US dollar (apple green) stoked a boom in the US S&P 500 and similarly on the CRB Precious commodity metals sub-index (red) and an increase in inflation expectations as measured by the 10 year yield of US Treasuries (green). The yield relationship difference between stocks and bonds became unsustainable[7] which consequently culminated with the historic one day decline.

True, the dynamics of 1987 has been starkly different than today. We are experiencing a contiguous banking-welfare based crisis today which had been absent then in 1987.

But one striking similarity is how market expectations, which have been built on political actions, had completely diverged from what had been expected of the directions of policymaking.

Nevertheless the recent temblors experienced by the global financial markets following US Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke’s no ‘QE’ stimulus[8] during last September 21^st resonates on a ‘1987 moment’ but at a much modest scale.

This is NOT to say that another 1987 moment is imminent. Rather, this is to say that the sensitiveness to such market risks increases as political actions meant to resolve on the current issues remain ambiguous or will remain in an indeterminate state.

And this is to further emphasize that while a grand “aggressive” “comprehensive” strategy may forestall any major market convulsion for the moment, they are likely to be temporary measures targeted at buying time for the policymakers from which another crisis would likely unravel in the fullness of time.

For now, it would be best to watch closely on how policymakers will react.

I believe that a monumental buying opportunity may arise soon.

---

[1] Bloomberg.com S&P 500 Caps Longest Weekly Gain Since Feb., October 12, 2011

[2] Klein Michael Rosengen Eric Foreign Exchange Intervention as a Signal of Monetary Policy US Federal Bank of Boston, June 1991

[3] Wikipedia.org Plaza Accord

[4] Wikipedia.org Louvre Accord

[5] Mises Wiki Latin American debt crisis

[6]Ryunoshin Kamikawa The Bubble Economy and the Bank of Japan Osaka University Law Review, 2006 In the U.S., on the other hand, the new FRB Chairman Alan Greenspan raised interest rates in September. However, the dollar depreciated. Then, the U.S. government requested Japan and West Germany to reduce interest rates. Both countries declined and the Bundesbank performed an operation for increasing in the short-term interest rates in the market. Secretary Baker resented this and stated that the U.S. tolerated a weaker dollar on October 16. Investors recognized that this statement meant the failure of international policy coordination and they moved their financial assets out of the U.S. for fear of collapse of the dollar. This caused the heavy fall in the New York Stock Exchange on October 19 (Black Monday). The depreciation of the dollar continued after that and inflated asset prices and bond prices collapsed in the U.S. Then, Secretary Baker persuaded West Germany to lower the short-term interest rates)

[7] Mises Wiki Black Monday (1987)

[8] See Bernanke Jilts Markets on Steroids, Suffers Violent Withdrawal Symptoms September 22, 2011