Crack-Up Boom Spreads To Asia And The Philippines

``But the administration does not want to stop inflation. It does not want to endanger its popularity with the voters by collecting, through taxation, all it wants to spend. It prefers to mislead the people by resorting to the seemingly non-onerous method of increasing the supply of money and credit. Yet, whatever system of financing may be adopted, whether taxation, borrowing, or inflation, the full incidence of the government's expenditures must fall upon the public. With inflation as well as with taxation, it is the citizens who must foot the total bill. The distinguishing mark of inflation, when considered as a method of filling the vaults of the Treasury, is that it distributes the burden in a most unfair way, overcharging those who are least able to bear it.”-Ludwig von Mises The Truth About Inflation

I received 4 text messages and 2 telephone calls anew this week from different banking institutions offering me loans. This seems like a defining activity since the start of the year. I don’t recall of such persistency to promote access to credit even prior to the Asian Crisis in 1997.

Yet I assume that this could be a national dynamic. Nonetheless, I can’t help but associate the actions in the Phisix to such anecdotal evidence.

Obviously, the domestic banking system which functions as the primary source of funding, has only been responding to regulatory policies.

While we don’t have available national data yet as proof for our assumption, a prolonged accommodative monetary environment will imply further space for mass speculation and a greater degree of consumption growth-that is likely to be reflected on our economic statistics.

And this seems to be the case for Asia, see Figure 1.

Figure 1: Danske Weekly: Recovery Gets More Visible

As Danske’s Fleming Nielsen wrote in his Weekly Focus, ``June’s economic data confirmed that Asia is experiencing a pronounced upswing, with strong industrial production numbers across the board. Countries such as South Korea and Thailand, which were hit exceptionally hard by the global financial crisis, are seeing industrial production recover to pre-crisis levels at a surprising clip. There are also signs throughout Asia that domestic demand is picking up – especially private consumption, with rising retail and car sales in the past couple of months.” (emphasis added)

For us, aside from the government policies, such intense reaction has been a manifestation of the “anomalous” collapse in the last quarter of 2008, which had been due to the seizure in the US banking system which rippled globally- a shock we called as Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) [see What Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Have To Do With Today’s Financial Crisis].

Apparently the current actions in the financial markets and economic stats have strongly been validating our views.

Moreover, we see other national and regional quirks posing as significant influences that can electrify the pricing of regional financial assets.

As discussed in Philippine Phisix at 2,500: Monetary Forces Sows Seeds Of Bubble, ``it is likely that high savings rate combined with loose monetary policies to induce speculation, fiscal stimulus applied, largely unblemished banking system, and low systemic leverage that has impelled a bidding war in the stock markets and commodity markets.”

The Growing Inflationary Bias Of Asia’s Markets

For the longest time we had been advocating that in a world of central banking and virtual free lunch money polices, bubble cycles emanating from these are likely to be imbued more by Asia and emerging markets since developed economies have debts that have been “hocked to their eyeballs”.

Doug Noland in his Credit Bubble Bulletin says the same, `` The most robust inflationary biases are today domiciled in China, Asia and the emerging markets generally. The debased dollar has provided China and the “developing” world Credit systems unprecedented capacity to inflate (expand Credit/financial claims without fear of spurring a run on their currencies). Asian and emerging markets are outperforming, exacerbating speculative flows. Things that the “developing” world needs (energy/commodities) and wants (gold, silver, sugar, etc.) should demonstrate increasingly strong inflationary pressures. Their overflow of dollars provides them, for now, the power to buy whatever they desire.”

And the transmission mechanism from US Federal Reserve policies into global assets have nowhere been more explicit see figure 2.

Figure 2: Stockcharts.com: US dollar Index’s Inverse Correlation

As we pointed out in Asia Sows The Seeds Of The Business Cycle, a breakdown in the US dollar index (USD) seem likely to propel a reacceleration of the asset bidding wars.

The USD indeed broke down last week which likewise brought many global stock market benchmarks to new post crisis highs (the Philippine Phisix nearly touched the 2,900 level). However, Friday’s announcement of the US unemployment data, which showed a modicum of progress, may have incited a USD short covering.

The fun part is identifying the apparently synchronized inverse correlation of oil (WTIC), Emerging Market stocks (EEM) and Asia ex-Japan (DJP2) where the crucial inflection point has been vividly demarcated in March (see the red horizontal line).

So those arguing on the basis of the traditional fundamentalist metrics seem to be looking at the wrong picture. Inflation appears to be increasingly the principal moving force behind the motions of the progressively interconnected global financial asset markets.

The Global Crack-Up Boom

Where financial markets once functioned as signals for economic transitions, it would now appear that financial markets have become the essence of global economies, where the real economy have been subordinated to paper shuffling activities.

What was once a feature dominated by the West, seem likely to get assimilated rapidly by the East as government policies appear to be directed at either juicing up or controlling the “animal spirits”.

Nonetheless today these dynamics have been “globalized”.

Proof?

We pointed out last week (see The Inflation Cycle Accelerates; Asia As Chief Beneficiary) how China has been dithering over the explosive rise of its stock and property markets wherein policymakers signaled intentions to rein the markets by restricting flow of credit. However, the violent response in the stock market compelled a retraction from authorities.

This week we see more of the same.

Publicly listed state owned China Construction Bank President Zhang Jianguo reportedly resolved to materially prune its credit expansion. According to Bloomberg ``the nation’s second-largest bank will cut new lending by about 70 percent in the second half to avert a surge in bad debt.”

The result had been the same, after a reaching a new high, China’s Shanghai Index crumbled over the last 3 sessions to end the week down 4.4%.

In the US, the path to serfdom continues, the Federal Trade Commission has issued new rules to ``crack down on fraud and manipulation that can drive up prices at the pump.” (Bloomberg) Oil prices which had been on a tear mostly reflecting on the US dollar’s earlier breakdown, had been tempered anew by the realized regulatory actions (more than just threats), aside from the sharp rally in the US dollar.

Still the WTIC rose by over 2% the week.

In the UK, the Bank of England (BoE) surprised the markets when it announced additional quantitative easing measures. This means that the central bank will be issuing ‘money from thin air’ to acquire domestic sovereign instruments (Gilt) as well as “high” quality corporate debt (Marketwatch). While directly such policies are aimed at propping up the financial system, implicitly it further implies support to financial asset prices. The British pound fell .21% over the week.

In anticipation of prospective inflation, Australia will be resurrecting issuance of inflation indexed bonds as a hedge. According to Bloomberg, ``Australia will sell its first inflation-indexed bonds in six years as record stimulus spending worldwide prompts speculation price increases will resume once the global recession ends…

``Asia-Pacific governments including Australia, Japan and Thailand had signaled they may sell inflation-linked bonds as improving economies threaten to boost the price of goods and services. Australia, which considered scrapping its bond market in 2003, boosted its debt outstanding by 67 percent to A$101.1 billion ($85 billion) in the year ended June 30, about 10 percent of its gross domestic product.”

The significance:

One, when government and financial claims grow more than real output or available economic resources the outcome is materially higher prices.

Two, governments are in a predicament, while they want to see sustained elevated or high financial asset prices, to give the impression of economic growth and to further unleash “animal spirits” or expand risk appetite, the demand from excessive money has also diffused into scarce economic resources which has compelled them to impose price controls [as previously discussed in The Inflation Cycle Accelerates; Asia As Chief Beneficiary].

Price controls will only cause arbitrages into markets that are more open, it would also reduce market pricing efficiency by distorting them and enhance shortages which would fuel more volatility.

Here, as expected governments are bent to deal with the symptoms than the cause. The superficial nature of policy actions enhances nurturing the bubble cycle.

Three, bubble affected economies will likely prompt for more borrowing (see figure 3) and more money issuance activities as signified by Bank of England’s QE or Secretary Tim Geithner’s request to the US Congress to expand debt limit to $12.1 trillion (HT: Craig McCarty).

As Doug Noland aptly observed of the inflationary pyramid being erected (from the same article), ``The deeply maladjusted U.S. “Bubble” economy requires $2.5 Trillion or so of net new Credit creation to stem systemic (Credit and economic Bubble) implosion. Only “government” (Treasury, agency debt, GSE MBS) debt can, today, fill the gigantic void created with the bursting of the Wall Street/mortgage finance Bubble. The private sector Credit system is severely impaired, and there is as well the reality that the market largely lost trust (loss of “moneyness”) in Wall Street obligations (private-label MBS, CDO, ABS, auction-rate securities, etc.). The $2.0 Trillion of U.S. “government” Credit creation coupled with the Trillion-plus expansion of Federal Reserve Credit over the past year has stabilized U.S. financial and economic systems.” (emphasis added)

Figure 3: Bloomberg Chart of the Day: Addiction To Debt

The above chart shows that in the US it now takes about $4 dollars of debt to generate $1 of economic output (left window), while debt to GDP ratio has soared to 372%, which is clearly unsustainable.

Yet the policy direction is assuredly headed towards engaging in more borrowing and issuance of paper or digital money. Recently the US extended $2 billion “cash for clunkers” program which incentivize people to replace old cars with new ones supported by government subsidies (Bloomberg) is another example of debt addiction.

As Ludwig von Mises warned, ``But the boom cannot continue indefinitely. There are two alternatives. Either the banks continue the credit expansion without restriction and thus cause constantly mounting price increases and an ever-growing orgy of speculation, which, as in all other cases of unlimited inflation, ends in a ‘crack-up boom’ and in a collapse of the money and credit system. Or the banks stop before this point is reached, voluntarily renounce further credit expansion and thus bring about the crisis." (emphasis added)

The end result would likely be a nasty choice between that of market compelled deflation or hyperinflation.

The institutional bank run in the US that triggered the 2008 meltdown (in financial markets and global trade) was a classic example of the near “collapse of the credit system”.

In short, what is unsustainable won’t last. Artificial measures will only aggravate the imbalances.

In sum, all these account for the phenomenon known as the “crack-up boom” applied on a globalized scale.

Hence a bubble based boom equals a prospective bubble bust and another crisis down the road. So relish the fun while it lasts.

Interim Pause, The Bubble Blowing Dynamics At Least Until The 2010 Elections

Friday’s torrid bounce in the US dollar index could signify as a worthwhile pause for the vastly overheated Asian-Emerging Market stock markets (see figure 4)

Figure 4: US Global Investor: Asia Technically Overbought

According to US Global Investors, ``For the first time since mid-1999, stocks in emerging Asia are trading at more than 35 percent premium to the 200-day simple moving average, an overbought condition which historically has resulted in sizable corrections in the following months.”

So if this should hold true, then a correction would likely be in the range of 10-20%.

Nonetheless we can expect any material decline would likely be met by anxious officials who would hastily act to restore boom conditions.

Remember, in today’s era where policies are skewed towards favoring paper shuffling activities and where the financial sector acts as the principal growth engine of the economy, rising prices are construed as the norm (for statistical purposes) regardless of the substance of the growth. So lofty prices in financial assets will likely be the undeclared policy thrust.

Nevertheless in a bull market hiatus, which is likely a function of profit taking than policy reversals, declines are less likely to move in tidal fashion, as some stocks may generate speculative attention because the marketplace would continually seek for yields in response to the loose monetary environment.

And applied to the Philippine Phisix, foreign buying, which has largely been absent for most of the first semester of the year, appears to have returned. For three successive weeks, we have seen a net buying from foreign funds in both nominal terms and in the broader market.

So the recent approach towards the 2,900 level could be interpreted as the bidding up of Philippine stocks compounded by foreign buying as we had been expecting. In Philippine Phisix at 2,500: Monetary Forces Sows Seeds Of Bubble, we said, ``So renewed interests from foreign investors on emerging markets are likely to even propel stock prices to higher levels! We should see the same dynamics reinforced locally. This time it will probably be foreigners chasing stock prices.”

Nonetheless, foreigners entering the local market appear to have been responding to the decline of the US dollar index.

If the US dollar is expected to fall further especially against Asian currencies then such dynamics are likely to be sustained. This would function as an important support to key components of the Phisix which also means a cushion from any major correction.

Figure 5: PSE: Share of Foreign Trade

Yet, despite this foreign trade improvement, the shape of today’s rally has departed from the 2003-2007 paradigm, where this time, local investors have powered the market as shown in Figure 6. Foreign trade from the start of the year have seen only occasional bouts where it gone beyond the 50% level which characterized the previous run.

At the end of the day, domestic policymakers will also want to see such trend persist going into the local national election season, as this would boost the odds of reducing the negative rating of the incumbent President PGMA thereby improve the chances for her appointee during the national election derby.

The Fallacies of Inflating Away Debt

``In an inflationary world, deficit spending and an easy-money policy have other reasons. Deficit spending is resorted to simply because of inability to balance the budget. It is purely involuntary. An easy-money policy is advocated because it seems to make possible a speedy reduction of the interest and debt burden of the government and the balancing of the budget without imposing higher taxes. Sometimes it is urged also as a command of social justice. The latter argument is of course based upon pure illusion. Small savers pay the bill directly or indirectly via savings banks and insurance companies, whereas large capitalists, who are interested chiefly in equities, harvest the profits from refunding operations.” L. Albert Hahn The Economics of Illusion

In the US, many harbor the delusion of inflating away the massively expanding debt levels as the ‘best alternative’ policy. Such advocates appears guilty of the following sins:

One, interpreting past performance as future outcome. A semblance of success during the previous incidences allowed for the deferment of the day of reckoning because debt levels had been low, or otherwise said, the economy can yet afford to pay for such policies.

Nonetheless, the untold truth is that the subsequent growth in such imbalances has ensured the reemergence of such boom-bust cycles with greater magnitude of impact.

Two, extensive “blind” faith on governments, to ably prevent collapses in spite of evidences, proved to be a myth.

The multifaceted ‘innovative’ Fed programs (TARP, TALF, Maiden Lane LLC, TSLF, MMIFF, Reciprocal currency swaps et. al.) failed to prevent or forestall the 2008 meltdown, this serves as another patent example of government failure.

Figure 6: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis: Duration of Current Recession

Another fiction is the idea that inflationary policies has shortened the duration of recession period (see figure 6) or has alleviated its depth (figure 7).

Figure 7: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis: Depth of Recession

Despite all expenditures thrown at the expense of the taxpayers, the 2007 recession has been the worst among the 10 post war recessions.

Lastly, they blithely ignore the unseen or unreckoned with ramifications of the shifting but continually expanding debt loads while depleting productive resources of the economy.

In other words, such advocates underestimate the degree of the impact from present policies.

Inflation Is A Political Process, From Risk To Uncertainty

Given the extent of the rapidly expanding debt levels, not only in the US but elsewhere too, relying on inflation to diminish real debt value could make the stagflationary period of 70s look like a picnic in the park.

This likewise risks provoking political unrest or war from prolonged or extended depression.

In short, those who embrace inflationary policies parochially forget that inflation is a political process and thus has political consequences.

As James Kunstler rightly explains, ``It would be sententious to explain how this destroys currencies, but wherever ‘monetizing debt’ has been tried before in history, that is the outcome. The result would be ruinous at every level and would lead straight to the second terrible force: social upheaval brought on by the conversion of economic problems into political turbulence.” (emphasis added)

In addition, while it is true that today’s monetary and fiscal deficit spending policies momentarily benefits asset market participants (that includes me), this view neglects the possible adverse repercussions from regulators to misjudge or miscalculate on the application of untried or untested tools that may trigger disorderly adjustments in the financial markets and the economy system.

Morgan Stanley’s Manoj Pradhan has this insightful observation,

``Central banks correctly describe programmes like quantitative easing as ‘unconventional'. Being far from the norm, policy-makers do not have much experience in dealing with such unconventional policies with nearly the same familiarity as the interest rate tool. When downside risks were dominating, policy-makers were only too willing to throw everything including the kitchen sink at the problem. For the most crucial passage of time in the past two years (the time since September 2008 when markets froze), central bank purchases of risky assets and government bonds (i.e., ‘active' QE) contributed to lower yields and spreads. Outright expansion of these programmes or the implicit threat that they could be enlarged in scope and/or size also kept yields and spreads from rising too much, and the real economy benefited from these developments. Selling assets purchased according to these ‘active' QE programmes could easily reverse those moves, particularly with a return to growth and the risk of inflation. With very little experience in handling such large unwinds along with the risk of derailing a hard-fought recovery by sending yields and spreads higher, central banks are unlikely to move particularly rapidly.” (emphasis added)

When policymakers ply on uncharted territories, instead of dealing with risks, we are transformed into dealing with non-Priceable Knightean “uncertainties”.

The underlying difference against risk, to quote economist Frank H. Knight is that “Risk is present when future events occur with measurable probability” while “Uncertainty is present when the likelihood of future events is indefinite or incalculable”.

In short, the law of unintended consequences has been increasing its role in the unfolding inflationary cycle.

The Bureaucratic Incentive Problem**

Besides, there has always been the question of incentives underpinning the actions of policymakers involved.

When unelected officials (e.g. Treasury or Central Banks) dabble with economic or financial policy tools or regulations or assume greater bandwith of power over their constituents, their accountability essentially remains the same.

Any adverse outcomes arising from their actions on the economic or financial sphere will only lead to, at worst, a job loss-but in most cases the same officials get enlisted with private firms they regulate. Since, to quote Ludwig von Mises, ``A bureaucrat differs from a nonbureaucrat precisely because he is working in a field in which it is impossible to appraise the result of a mans effort in terms of money”.

In short, it cost little for them to commit a policy error, since they’re not punished for it and are measured not based on money performances but on the impact during their tenure.

Hence, policymakers are likely to take actions that are designed for generating short term “visible” benefits at the cost of deferring the “unseen” cumulative long term risks, which are usually are aligned with the office tenure (let the next guy handle the mess) or if they happen to be politically influenced by the incumbent administration (generates impacts that can win votes).

So bureaucratic myopia seems in a natural state of conflict with the long term interest of the marketplace and can function as another vital factor in amplifying the risks of enabling future crises.

**Update: I forgot to include this portion

Philippine Politics: Always Waiting For Godot

``In our age there is no such thing as ‘keeping out of politics’. All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred, and schizophrenia.”-George Orwell, Politics and the English Language

Philippine elections are near, and so the politicization trends have apparently been intensifying.

In contrast to the public, whom are seemingly severely obsessed with sensationalism, we think that the Con Ass is nothing but a diversionary ploy, because it lacks the time element and the legal channels and risks running the same parallels to the Honduran experience.

This means I don’t buy the balderdash that the highly unpopular PGMA will run anew or that the passing of President Corazon Aquino will “harm” PGMA’s political interest for the said reasons.

For me, the ‘Hello Garci scandal’ signifies as the apogee of any political capital damaging events that could have undone her, yet she persisted.

Media and its gullible captive audiences, simply loves to pick on fights that can’t go beyond superficialities. Worst, they promote abstractions (fair, good or evil, greed or etc…), when the truth is that political winds always see a shift in allegiances.

In politics (here or elsewhere), the rule of thumb has been ‘there are no permanent friends only permanent interests’.

As an aside, it would be downright naïve to also believe that Philippine politics runs on simple “partyline” platforms; as if ideology ever mattered.

Yet do any of the aspiring candidates have one?

Yes, every candidate wants corruption free “good” government alright, but unfortunately their aspirations operate asymmetrically on the platform of free lunch and an ever expanding bureaucratic based redistributive system of command and control. Regrettably, a system, which runs utterly in conflict to such supposed goals and which always penalizes the productive segment of the economy.

The reality is that politicians organize and run their bureaucratic network not by appointing people of virtue or by meritocracy but by political affiliations and interests.

Hence, policies are determined politically by populism or by political lobbying groups (hence the proclivity to corruption) or by the quirks of political leaders- preferences based on personal value priorities or marginal utility, familiarity (e.g. would favor industry from which the politico has experienced with), biases, perception and interpretation of events, ego, comfort zones and or preferred social networks (e.g. schoolmates, social organizations etc…).

Robert Ringer has this piquant quote to analogize our version of democratic politics ``You have to throw welfare programs at people — like throwing meat to a pack of wolves — even if the programs don't accomplish their alleged purpose and even if they're morally wrong." liberal Bennett Cerf quoted by Nathaniel Branden in Judgment Day: My Years With Ayn Rand” (emphasis added)

Political advertisements that dangle free this or free that or give away houses over media are fundamental examples.

The popular delusion is that the deliverance of the Philippines will come from a SAINT like leader. This shows that what matters for Philippine politics has been personality imagery, which signifies as the lotto mentality of short term gratification and is hardly about the realities of correcting the deeply flawed institutionalized political patronage system that relies on license based economic rents. Hence, the clueless citizenry will remain perpetually Waiting for Godot who in Samuel Beckett’s play never appears.

Moreover, since national election is just a few months away political forces have been mobilizing. And considering that the elite constituency of the Philippines have related or shared interests or direct/indirect affiliations, it is likely that unpublished alliances will determine the 2010 outcome.

This is where I think the administration and their allies will field multiple candidates, some camouflaged as the “opposition” or Trojan Horses.

So for clues of the possible contestants for the national elections, simply watch for the actions of the kingmakers involved in the ongoing Meralco episode as discussed in Bubble Thoughts Over Meralco’s Bubble.

Bottom line: The upcoming presidential election will likely have two known characteristics well described in quotes:

one, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, and

second, the more things change the more they remain the same.

Hence, I don’t expect any fundamental change in the political economy unless it is demanded for and in the interest of the political elitist segment of our society.

Innovation Trends In Mobile Banking

The wonders of the markets is that the competition to satisfy consumers (and thereby profit from it) function as a major pillar to technological innovation.

Take for instance, in the realm of mobile banking innovative products and services are rapidly being introduced.

Check deposits, money transfers and bills payment have expanded beyond the computers and can now be accessed through the mobile phone.

This should extrapolate to added mobility, greater financial access and savings (time, effort and resources) for consumers, as well as, efficiency and added productivity for the economy.

From mysanantonio.com, (HT: Mark Perry)

``The San Antonio-based company is testing the feature for its iPhone application among its employees and plans to release it to the public soon.

``It is similar to USAA's Deposit@Home program launched in 2006 that allows its customers to deposit checks from home using a computer and a scanner.

“To my knowledge, they will be the first bank to offer it broadly,” said Bob Meara, senior analyst with Celent's banking group in Atlanta. “I'm aware of some very small pilots going on with banks that plan to offer it to their business clients.”

``In mid-May, USAA released an iPhone app that allows people to access their accounts, pay bills, transfer funds and locate an ATM.



``With the application, USAA members simply sign the back of any check and then use their iPhone camera to take a picture of the check's front side and back side.

``They enter some information into the application — including the amount and where it's to be deposited — and then the funds are credited to the designated account.

``Most checks will get immediate availability of funds,” Dennes said."

Innovation, according to Murray Rothbard (Man Economy and State, Chapter 8) is one of the processes adopted by entrepreneurs.

``Entrepreneurial activities are derived from the presence of un­certainty. The entrepreneur is an adjuster of the discrepancies of the market toward greater satisfaction of the desires of the con­sumers. When he innovates he is also an adjuster, since he is ad­justing the discrepancies of the market as they present them­selves in the potential of a new method or product...

``By launching and producing more of the new process, he is pur­suing the entrepreneurial function of adjustment to consumer de­sires, i.e., what he estimates consumer desires will be. If he suc­ceeds in his estimate and reaps a profit, then he and others will continue in this line of activity until the income discrepancy is eliminated and there is no “pure” profit or loss in this area."

In other words, innovation thrives best in free markets.

The Seasonal 'Sell In May And Go Away ' Fails In 2009

This is just an example why seasonality factors may not be relied on.

According to Bloomberg,

``Global equity investors who follow the Wall Street axiom to “sell in May and go away” are missing out on the biggest gains in at least four decades.

``The MSCI World Index climbed 19 percent from May 1 through yesterday, the steepest advance for that period in the 23- country measure’s history stretching back to 1970, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

``The CHART OF THE DAY tracks the MSCI World’s performance in May through July during the three years it climbed most before 2009, including the previous record gain of 15 percent in 1997. During the past decade, it posted an average loss of 3.1 percent in those three months, falling eight times, Bloomberg data show...

``The “sell in May” strategy was first noted in 1986 by the Stock Trader’s Almanac, which found that $10,000 invested in the Dow Jones Industrial Average from May 1 through Oct. 31 since 1950 left investors with a loss of $1,522. A $10,000 compounding investment in the U.S. benchmark from Nov. 1 to April 30 led to a gain of about $88,000, according to the Almanac, started by Yale Hirsch and now edited by his son Jeffrey Hirsch."

It would appear that presently, the impact from government policies has stronger bearing than simply relying on seasonal patterns.

A Bet Against The Hong Kong's Peg, The Rise of the Yuan

Hong Kong's currency, the Hong Kong dollar, appears to be trading below the band allowed for its currency.

And the Wall Street Journal suggests that this appears to be a bet against the Hong Kong peg to the US dollar.
This from Wall Street Journal, (bold emphasis mine)

``Hong Kong won't break its 26-year-old currency peg to the U.S. dollar.

``Wanna bet?

``Traders in the currency forwards market are doing just that. Forwards give investors the right to buy or sell a currency at a fixed price at a certain point in the future, and they're now being traded with a view that the Hong Kong dollar is going to appreciate against the greenback.

``It's a trade that ignores history and the consensus among economists. In the past, it has proven a losing proposition.

``But the speculation highlights new pressures on the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. Hong Kong remains the gateway for foreign investors to profit from China's economic recovery and general strength, even as the dollar's value erodes on international markets due to the U.S. fiscal blowout.

``The forwards market currently implies that the value will be $7.726 in a year's time. Further out, the market is signaling an appreciation of 9% in the Hong Kong dollar by 2019.

``In recent months, the Hong Kong dollar has been stuck at the bottom of its band, and the HKMA has been printing Hong Kong dollars to sell on foreign exchange markets -- some US$44 billion over the last nine months -- to defend that."

Traders are betting on the fear that all this new money will inflate asset bubbles -- the bogeyman du jour -- which could force the HKMA to let its currency appreciate."

My take:

Since the Hong Kong currency has been pegged to the US dollar it implies that Hong Kong has essentially been importing its monetary policy.

Yet, the inflationary path undertaken by the US government suggest that Hong Kong is equally importing inflation-hence the rapid monetary expansion that has been fueling booming property and stocks.

Equally, the conditions of the economy of Hong Kong and the US are distinct. Hong Kong's relatively lesser degree of leverage amplifies the inflation transmission.

Additionally, the China's policy to promote the Yuan as regional currency standard equally puts pressure to the Hong Kong dollar as the Yuan gains more use than the Hong Kong dollar in Hong Kong's economy.

Lastly I wouldn't bet on past performance.

In my view, the Hong Kong dollar's pegged days seems numbered. And so as its existence, as the Yuan could displace it sometime in the near future.

All these would depend on the fate of the US dollar.

Warren Buffett: From Value Investor To Political Entrepreneur?

Warren Buffett has been widely known for his VALUE investing approach, largely influenced by his mentor Ben Graham.

But, lately our icon's political liberal leaning views, wherein he strongly supports government intervention in markets, appears to have similarly exposed a shift in his investing strategy, where Mr. Buffett's model appears to have evolved into investing under "government umbrella" or capitalizing on opportunities provided by the recent government sponsored bailouts.

In short, the reason he supports government intervention has been because he and his Berkshire Hathaway directly benefits from these.

Here is an excerpt from the splendid article from Reuter's Rolf Winkler, (all bold highlights mine)

``Today, Buffett remains famous for investing The Right Way. He even has a television cartoon in the works, which will groom the next generation of acolytes.

``But it turns out much of the story is fiction. A good chunk of his fortune is dependent on taxpayer largess. Were it not for government bailouts, for which Buffett lobbied hard, many of his company’s stock holdings would have been wiped out.

``Berkshire Hathaway, in which Buffett owns 27 percent, according to a recent proxy filing, has more than $26 billion invested in eight financial companies that have received bailout money. The TARP at one point had nearly $100 billion invested in these companies and, according to new data released by Thomson Reuters, FDIC backs more than $130 billion of their debt.

``To put that in perspective, 75 percent of the debt these companies have issued since late November has come with a federal guarantee...

``He even traded the bailout, seeking morally hazardous profits in preferred stock and warrants of Goldman and GE because he had “confidence in Congress to do the right thing” — to rescue shareholders in too-big-to-fail financials from the losses that were rightfully theirs to absorb...

More of the rest of Buffett's conflict of interest here.

Nonetheless Mr. Winkler, apparently dismayed with the clash in the purist market based imagery against Mr. Buffett's actual practice, concludes, ``What saddens me is that Buffett is uniquely positioned to lobby for better public policy, but he’s chosen to spend his considerable political capital protecting his own holdings."

``If we learn one lesson from this episode, it’s that banks should carry substantially more capital than may be necessary. You would think Buffett would agree. He has always emphasized investing with a “margin of safety” — so why shouldn’t banks lend with one?"

So what do you call entrepreneurs who profit from government intervention?

According to Wikipedia.org, `` a business entrepreneur who seeks to gain profit through subsidies, protectionism, government contracts, or other such favorable arrangements with government(s) through political influence (also known as corporate welfare)" is known as a political entrepreneur.

And an economy that thrives on political entrepreneurship is also pejoratively known as "crony capitalism"-an allegedly capitalist economy in which success in business depends on close relationships between businesspeople and government officials. It may be exhibited by favoritism in the distribution of legal permits, government grants, special tax breaks, and so forth (wikipedia.org).

And I mistakenly thought that political entrepreneurship only existed in "banana republics" characterized by mostly autocratic rulers (or even manipulated democracies) under unfree economies.

Has the political economy changed so much that has compelled our icon to shift strategies?

Or has Mr. Buffett's performance been a chronic "mythologizing a humble background"- typical of tycoons as Joe Studwell in Asian Godfathers observed-where reputation and reality do not match?

World's Largest Companies As Investing Roadmap?

Here is an interesting chart depicting the world's largest companies by market capitalization from the Economist.

According to the Economist, ``THE market capitalisation of PetroChina may have fallen by almost half in the past year, but it remains the world’s most valuable company. Chinese firms now occupy three of the top four slots. (The state’s large non-traded holdings are valued at market prices.) Seven of the 12 most valuable companies are either banks or oil producers. Wal-Mart, Johnson & Johnson and Procter & Gamble have all climbed the table in the past year; their industries tend to weather recessions better than others. Market capitalisation does not necessarily tally with other measures of size. Microsoft is worth more than Royal Dutch Shell, which has nearly eight times the revenue of the software company and 10,000 more employees." (emphasis added)

Given the sustainability of the present trends where Asia outperforms, the rankings will likely be skewed towards the inclusion of more Chinese or Asian companies, especially if the prediction of Templeton's Mark Mobius, where China's market value might overtake the US, would be anywhere accurate.

While past performance may not be indicative of the future, the evolution of global corporatism has been striking. The underlying themes being that of China-Asia, oil, global banking and consumer products and retailing.

Could this serve as our roadmap for investing?

Bubble Thoughts Over Meralco’s Bubble

``The lies the government and media tell are amplifications of the lies we tell ourselves. To stop being conned, stop conning yourself.”-James Wolcott, American Journalist

Meralco is in the spotlight anew.

The country’s premier utility firm, which holds the exclusive franchise for the electricity distribution for the National Capital Region (NCR), caught the public’s attention following a spectacular record romp by its share prices.

And last week’s parabolic vertiginous ride appears to have been playing out the blowoff phase of a conventional bubble cycle. (see Figure 1)

Figure 1: Bubble cycle (left) and Meralco (black candle right)

Importantly, like typical bubbles, the culmination of which can be identified by delusional rationalizations aided by experts exacerbated by media- Meralco’s skyrocketing price has been attributed to speculations on a prospective ‘tender offer’ (Bloomberg)!

Allegedly one of the titans involved [see King Kong Versus Godzilla at the PSE; Where Politics Trumps Markets] in the drama of the recent corporate joust has acquiesced to a purchase price of Php 300 per share which would require a mandated offering to minority stockholders!

Yet rising prices and some special trades (block sales and cross trades) have been used as signs to confirm on such myths.

Why do we think all these rationalizations seem ridiculous?

Simply said, because logical reasoning has been totally thrown out of the window!

As financial writer and investment speaker Joe Granville warned, ``the media is the biggest enemy of the small investor, mostly headlining the wrong news at the wrong times, playing on his misguided reliance on fundamentals and his normal fears and greeds.”

Putting A Perspective On Meralco’s Price And Corporate Disconnect

To put on some level headed perspective we will deal with some key issues.

First, on a year to date basis, despite the recent turbocharged upsurge, Meralco hasn’t been the only leader with 284.87% of gains (as of Friday’s close).

Other issues like Phisix component mining giant Lepanto Consolidate (+271.43%) and Business Process Outsourcing Paxys (+358.33%) have seen the similar or greater level of share price action as seen in the above chart represented by the green and red lines respectively.

As an aside, I wouldn’t suggest that the latter two would seem in a bubble considering the U-shaped recovery vis-à-vis Meralco’s actions which appear to have replicated the motions of a bubble paradigm as shown in the chart.

Although from a trough to peak basis, Meralco, hands down based from last year, does hold the tiara for market outperformance (700%).

Nonetheless, one must be reminded that past performances are not indicative of future outcomes.

Two, Meralco’s share in the Phisix has now jumped to 7.7% from less than 1%, as we similarly pointed out in Beware Of The Brewing Meralco Bubble!, and now holds the second spot after PLDT in terms of free floated market cap.

This for a company whose profits are constrained by political forces! (see below)

Meralco has effectively, leapfrogged over former heavyweights Ayala Corp, Bank of the Philippines, Globe Telecoms, Ayala Land and SM Investments.

With Meralco’s share of the Phisix gaining more weight, any ensuing volatility from its share prices will likely be reflective on the directions of the Philippine benchmark unless counterweighted by the lagging erstwhile behemoths.

Three, financial valuations, if any of these apply at all, have ENTIRELY been jettisoned for wanton speculations and nonsensical justifications.

As we discussed in Meralco’s Run Reflects On The Philippine Political Economy, the share price movements in the local markets hardly reflects on corporate fundamentals.

The first three factors cited above have clearly been validating our Livermore-Machlup model where Philippine equities move in tidal fashion underpinned by liquidity or loose monetary landscape.

This climate essentially begets a predominant horse racing outlook or mentality, where canards touted as facts mostly emanating from the foibles of cognitive biases.

In short, NO liquidity from loose monetary policies equals NO bubbles, and all the rest are simply footnotes.

As writer Peter McWilliams warned (bold highlights mine), ``The media tends to report rumors, speculations, and projections as facts... How does the media do this? By quoting some "expert"... you can always find some expert who will say something hopelessly hopeless about anything..” Indeed.

Fourth, common sense should dictate to us that perhaps none of these engaged (supposedly cunning and astute) Taipans, whom have built their wealth and “credibility” over the years, would likely pay for excessively or overpriced assets, unless they have other undeclared agenda in mind, which are exclusive of profits meant for the institutions which they represent.

Yet, any outrageous and reckless acquisitions, that would put at risk the interests of such institutions involved, could provoke a minority shareholder revolt. That’s assuming shareholder activism is alive here. Nevertheless, even in the absence of it, we should expect the minority foreign shareholders to vote with their feet.

In short, the supposed buyout, from the alleged stratospheric levels, signifies as tremendous costs to the interests of the company they represent from both the majority and minority stakeholders’ perspectives.

Needless to say, the present day hysteria from rising share prices is temporal in nature and subject to market cycles and does NOT represent the underlying fundamentals. Unless people think that these tycoons are dimwits, I would bet on the opposite…that the so called godfathers involved are cognizant of this!

Fifth, even if the so called buyout does occur, it is less likely that such deal would be consummated in transparency or reflective of market conditions.

These titans could have such transaction wrapped up much earlier than known by the public, or have done so with attendant compromises such as rebates et.al., and could use recent actions as a partial exit point to profit from today’s insanity.

Lastly, as we have been repeatedly arguing, the Meralco brouhaha is beyond the sphere of normal financial analysis because it is a POLITICAL SENSITIVE public listed company.

You can’t just attribute earnings without comprehending on the business model from which the company operates on.

Besides, here, the interests of the owners under the said platform are divergent from the interest of the minority shareholders.

Here is why.

Meralco’s Business Model: From RORB TO PBR

Lately, Meralco’s business model has shifted from Rate of Return Based (RORB) to Performance Based Rating (PBR).

According to GMANews.tv, ``The new PBR scheme also replaces the return on rate base (RORB) formula, which charges customers for using Meralco assets — including posts and cables — in bringing electricity to its end-users.

``Under the RORB, public utilities such as Meralco are disallowed from charging rates exceeding 12 percent of the worth of its total assets.”

So what’s PBR?

According to the same article, ``The new scheme provides “rewards and penalties for performance and non-performance respectively, Jose de Jesus, Meralco president said.

``Under the said mechanism, Meralco may be required to pay fines should its performance — such as failing to immediately respond to a blackout — fall below certain standards.”

And why PBR?

According to the “quasi independent” regulator of Meralco the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC),

``The ERC adopted the PBR for distribution utilities starting in 2005 pursuant to its authority under Section 43 (f) of Republic Act No. 9136 (EPIRA) to adopt internationally accepted rate making methodologies. PBR strives to achieve a balance between efficient price levels, allowing utilities efficient revenue to ensure their sustainability, and maintaining or improving network service performance levels. It provides strong incentives to improve operational efficiencies. International experience (Australia and United Kingdom) indicates that, over time, with its built-in mechanisms for incentives and fines depending on the utilities’ performance, PBR leads to reductions in the real price of electricity distribution while improving service levels.”

Aside, the ERC has required Meralco to implement a subsidized rates for the poor by the so-called “NEW LIFELINE program, where ``The ERC reiterated that customers consuming only 20 kWh and below shall continue to enjoy the 100% discount granted them and shall pay only the adjusted PhP5.30 per month metering charge, while the other lifeline customers shall enjoy a discount corresponding to the consumption level under the new lifeline program approved under the DTI case, including the PhP21.00/customer/month minimum charge.”

Implications Of The Business Model: Absolute Dependence On Political Discretion!

What ALL of these means:

1. Basically prices charged to the paying consumers of Meralco are solely determined by the ERC and NOT by the markets.

This means that Meralco’s profits are ultimately determined by fickle political winds.

As Ludwig von Mises described of Bureaucratic Management of Private Enterprises, ``But ours is an age of a general attack on the profit motive. Public opinion condemns it as highly immoral and extremely detrimental to the commonweal. Political parties and governments are anxious to remove it and to put in its place what they call the “service” point of view and what is in fact bureaucratic management.”

Think $100 oil. Rising energy prices are likely to stoke political discomfort among the society’s underprivileged from which would force politicians to focus on “windfall profits”.

Yet, in a world where profits will be deemed as inconsistent with political interests, the owners of Meralco will likely wring profits out through other mechanisms, e.g. off balance sheet transactions, loans or contracts to affiliated parties, transfer pricing and etc.

In short, where financial reports will unlikely be transparent, the interests of the owners of Meralco and the minority shareholders departs.

2. Meralco maintains a subsidy for the poor from which are tacitly charged to the account of the middle and high income consumers.

This exemplifies as a “private” company, functioning under stringent control of political interests, conducting the political redistribution aspect in behalf of the government. Hence Meralco acts as a subcontracted implementing agent under political behest.

This implies that economic rents or “profits” for Meralco’s owner managers will only be attained under the auspices of the political leadership for as long as the political interests are served.

3. Under the PBR, the ERC determines the “carrot and stick” for Meralco.

Basically, Meralco’s lifeline hangs on ERC’s dictate!

This implies that the ERC and Meralco will haggle over what comprises as sufficient or inadequate under the PBR guidelines and NOT the consumers.

And since rules are always technically subjective and subject to nonlinear or amorphous interpretations, they will be subject to compromises. Ask the lawyers.

Therefore this implies two things:

One absolute subservience to the political office, where to quote Ludwig von Mises in Bureaucracy, ``Under this system the government has unlimited power to ruin every enterprise or to lavish favors upon it. The success or failure of every business depends entirely upon the free discretion of those in office.” (bold highlights mine)

Second, instead of looking after the welfare of its clients (Metro Manila consumers), the unlimited dependence on the discretion of the government bureaucracy means conflict of interests from parties involved abound.

Principally, the owner’s priorities will mostly be directed into the realm of public relations; of wheedling or currying favor with that of ‘The Powers That Be’. Satisfying the public will requirements will be subordinate to this.

Again from Ludwig von Mises, ``In such an environment the entrepreneur must resort to two means: diplomacy and bribery. He must use these methods not only with regard to the ruling party, but no less with regard to the outlawed and persecuted opposition groups which one day may seize the reins. It is a dangerous kind of double-dealing; only men devoid of fear and inhibitions can last in this rotten milieu. Businessmen who have grown up under the conditions of a more liberal age have to leave and are replaced by adventurers.” (bold emphasis mine)

The sordid and unfortunate experience of the current managers in the besieged Lopez group (who appear to be outgoing****), having to oppose the PGMA administration politically, serves as fundamental and shining example of the consequences of political defiance.

So those nurturing the view that owner-managers of political enterprises will be looking for one dimensional financial bottom line growth are living in a world of fairy tales.

Thus, financial statements have little relevance to Meralco’s valuation as a financial security because economic rents accruing the owner-managers of Meralco may come in sundry forms, than simplistically “profits” as defined by textbooks.

Besides, as pointed out in Has Meralco’s Takeover Been A Good Sign?, the current managing owners of Meralco have to deal with socio-political, bureaucratic and political risks, which ultimately mean that they need to be in constant harmonious relations with the current and forthcoming political leaders.

These are things that are learned outside of traditional or mainstream school curriculums. And yet these signify as unorthodox or contrarian views that operate realistically.

4. The ERC’s leadership is appointed by the President of the Philippines.

This makes the agency hardly independent as purported to be, but instead beholden to the administration.

Again since political appointments are almost always based on political affiliates or interests and are hardly ever about virtues or meritocracy, the direction of regulatory implementation and compliance will likely be dependent on the caprices of the political leadership.

Conclusion/Additional Comments

All these imply that the rewards from the ownership of Meralco comes with the blessings of the ‘Powers That Be’ combined with a possible implied backstop (guarantee) in the case of failure or bankruptcy, provided that the interests of the company’s owner managers or political entrepreneurs operate along the lines of interests of the incumbent political leaders.

Therefore it would be foolhardy or naïve to believe that the tycoons that got engaged in Meralco with billions of pesos of investments, had been there to only leverage on the political misfortunes of the present owners and to speculate on share prices while at the same time ignoring the risks associated with the political aspects of having a stake in Meralco.

Also, this implies that the changing dynamics of the ownership structure of Meralco strongly alludes to the next president-the identity of which only the kingmakers or the chief Meralco proponents know.

****The prevailing notion is that there has been an ongoing power struggle in Meralco.

For me, this seems like an oversimplistic crock.

In my view, both protagonists appear like unheralded allies, only awaiting the appropriate opportunity for a graceful exit for the Lopezes, which I think should come after the elections.

As per Joe Studwell in Asian Godfathers, ``The reality is that tycoons are typically forced to invest together because of the environment in which they operate.” (emphasis mine)

Considering that Meralco’s destiny is fundamentally intertwined with the Presidency, this probably implies that both godfathers could be straddling in support of different candidates in the forthcoming Presidential elections where its outcome will decide who among the two groups will takeover.

Although it is most likely that a price agreement for the prospective exchange may have already been sealed but perhaps at prices much less than the rumors (my guess is anywhere Php 90-120).

Moreover, it has been my inclination to believe that the Meralco saga will unfold similar to the Philippine Airlines privatization, where former PLDT chair Antonio Cojuangco initially fronted for the bidding which ultimately landed in the laps of Taipan Lucio Tan, the current owner.

Finally, of course, both parties would want to see Meralco’s share prices remain elevated, hence through various associates or intermediaries, they might continue to float stories from which the public so eagerly yearns for, as appetizer for their innate speculative instincts operating under today’s loose monetary environs.

However, the idea is-once the political matters have been settled, excess shares could be sold through the markets or that if any contingency arises (such as a dark horse winner in the Presidential elections) both parties can avail of present lofty prices as an exit strategy.