Showing posts with label tyranny majority. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tyranny majority. Show all posts

Sunday, May 04, 2014

Rob Schneider: America is Sliding Very Fast Towards Fascism

Even celebrity American comedian Rob Schneider, in a recent interview with Chris Stigall, recognizes how freedom is fast being eroded and transformed into fascism in America. Fascism, according to Wikipedia, is a “form of radical authoritarian nationalism”. Known Fascist regimes include Italy’s Benito Mussolini and Germany’s Adolf Hitler 




From CBS
Chris Stigall spoke with comedian Rob Schneider on Talk Radio 1210 WPHT about the struggle comedians face in today’s current political environment.

Schneider struck on ominous tone when discussing the path he sees the country on.

“Democracies don’t end well. We are sliding very fast towards fascism. It’s an ugly kind of thing. There’s this kind of mob mentality that we have to be careful of,” he said.

He believes comedians are pressured toward one side of the political spectrum.

“There’s a polarization that’s happening…I do think you look can look at government and go, ‘Wow, it is out of control now,’ and if you do criticize or tend to be not directly along a liberal stand, you can get murdered,” Schneider commented.

Schneider was very critical of the President’s handling of the economy and he feels certain policies are impacting businesses.

“There’s not one segment of business under the Obama administration that hasn’t been hurt…he attacks for-profit schools, which is totally an elitist thing from a guy that went to Harvard. I think for free, by the way,” Schneider said.

He was also critical of the media for being overly influenced by the government and not standing up for the American people.
This looks intriguing (but praiseworthy) because Mr. Schneider seems to be playing a role of an industry iconoclast, particularly when he censures media for being influenced by politics and the mob mentality (where political media plays a big role in shaping opinions).

Fascism is not just a political aspect, it covers economic dimensions via massive interventionism which compromises private property but gives marginal leeway to entrepreneurs. Crony capitalism is a common feature of such state determined political economic arrangement.

Finally, if the political trend in the US has been in transition to fascism, what would characterize her foreign policies? Would her allies be transformed into fascist satellite states too?


Thursday, January 30, 2014

Quote of the Day: Protection against the tyranny of the prevailing opinion and feeling

Like other tyrannies, the tyranny of the majority was at first, and is still vulgarly, held in dread, chiefly as operating through the acts of the public authorities. But reflecting persons perceived that when society is itself the tyrant—society collectively, over the separate individuals who compose it—its means of tyrannizing are not restricted to the acts which it may do by the hands of its political functionaries. Society can and does execute its own mandates: and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it practises a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself. Protection, therefore, against the tyranny of the magistrate is not enough: there needs protection also against the tyranny of the prevailing opinion and feeling; against the tendency of society to impose, by other means than civil penalties, its own ideas and practices as rules of conduct on those who dissent from them; to fetter the development, and, if possible, prevent the formation, of any individuality not in harmony with its ways, and compel all characters to fashion themselves upon the model of its own. There is a limit to the legitimate interference of collective opinion with individual independence: and to find that limit, and maintain it against encroachment, is as indispensable to a good condition of human affairs, as protection against political despotism.
(bold and italics mine)

This is from English philosopher and political economist John Stuart Mill from his essay On Liberty as published at the Bartleby.com.

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Man of Steel: One heck of an unorthodox Superhero movie

Man of Steel,  for me, signifies as one heck of an unorthodox superhero movie

In stereotyped movies, superheroes have been assumed to possess the politically correct ethical behavior. But not this one.

This movie extends to the shaping of Clark Kent’s values and character mostly by his foster father and mentor, Jonathan Kent.

Like the ethics of good old kung fu movie days, the elder and fatherly Kent, impressed upon his son of the importance of self-discipline, in the fear that his adapted son’s supernatural powers would be spurned and rejected by the human society.

Gosh, this fabulous dialogue—between dad Kent and his extra-terrestrial 13-year old son over the latter’s lifesaving of his schoolmates from a drowning school bus—represents a deontological dilemma something which philosophers from different ideological camps would passionately debate on…

All quotes from the IMDb.
Jonathan Kent: You have to keep this side of yourself a secret.

Clark Kent at 13: What was I supposed to do? Let them die?
[brief pause]

Jonathan Kent: Maybe...
The elder Kent knew that the supernatural powers of son would be put to good use one day, but until then should refrain from exposing himself…
Jonathan Kent: You're not just anyone. One day, you're going to have to make a choice. You have to decide what kind of man you want to grow up to be. Whoever that man is, good character or bad, it's going to change the world.
The sacrificing of the life of Jonathan Kent in order for Clark to realize the importance of self-discipline, in a tornado disaster, served as the climax of Clark’s moral and character training.

The movie importantly depicts of one of the greatest battles of our time: freedom versus collectivism. 

Superman’s nemesis General Zod wanted to resurrect genetically-engineered (and programmed) Kryptonians in earth via a genocide of the human race. General Zod brought into light Jeremy Bentham’s consequentialist “greatest good for the greatest number” utilitarianism
General Zod: No matter how violent, every action I take is for the greater good of my people.
Sounds familiar?

On the other hand, the reason Clark Kent’s biological Krypton father, Jor-el, sent his son Clark Kent/Kal-El (Kryptonian name) to earth was for the latter to steer his own destiny (freedom).
Jor-El: What if a child dreamed of becoming something other than what society had intended? What if a child aspired to something greater?
Such ideological conflict between Jor-el and General Zod, which was carried over by son Clark Kent/Kal-El, represents the crux of the movie.

For all the film’s other minor blemishes, the Man of Steel seems as a refreshing entertainment film against the predominant populist pseudo politically correct themes.

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Quote of the Day: Invoking Democracy to Destroy Freedom

People are taught that, thanks to democracy, coercion is no longer dangerous because people get to vote on who coerces them. Because people are permitted a role in choosing who will be in charge of the penal code, they are free. Being permitted to vote for politicians who enact unjust, oppressive new laws magically converts the stripes on prison shirts into emblems of freedom. But it takes more than voting to make coercion benign.

The fiction of majority rule has become a license to impose nearly unlimited controls on the majority and everybody else. The doctrine of “majority rule equals freedom” is custom-made to turn mobs of voters into spoiled children with a divine right to plunder the candy store. The only way to equate submission to majority-sanctioned decrees with individual freedom is to assume that individuals have no right to live in any way that displeases the majority.

The more confused people’s thinking becomes, the easier it is for rulers to invoke democracy to destroy freedom. The issue is not simply Lincoln ‘s, Roosevelt’s, Clinton’s or Bush’s absurd statements on freedom but a cultural–intellectual smog in which politicians have unlimited leeway to redefine freedom. If politicians can redefine freedom at their whim, then they can raze limits on their own power.
This is from libertarian author and lecturer James Bovard at the Freeman.

It is important to distinguish constitutional/liberal democracy with that of social democracy and of mob rule (Ochlocracy)

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Quote of the Day: Elections Are and Always Mostly a Sham

Scholars have been slow to appreciate that elections are and always have been for the most part a sham – a mere ceremony intended to make people believe they have some control over their fate even as they are mercilessly bullied, bamboozled, and fleeced by their rulers.
This is from Robert Higgs’s 2004 volume, Against Leviathan; particularly from the “Escaping Leviathan?” as quoted by Professor Don Boudreaux at Café Hayek

Monday, February 25, 2013

Quote of the Day: The Folly of All for One

And is not this the point that we have now reached? What is the cry going up everywhere, from all ranks and classes? All for one! When we say the word one, we think of ourselves, and what we demand is to receive an unearned share in the fruits of the labor of all. In other words, we are creating an organized system of plunder. 

Unquestionably, simple out-and-out plunder is so clearly unjust as to be repugnant to us; but, thanks to the motto, all for one, we can allay our qualms of conscience. We impose on others the duty of working for us. Then, we arrogate to ourselves the right to enjoy the fruits of other men's labor. We call upon the state, the law, to enforce our so-called duty, to protect our so-called right, and we end in the fantastic situation of robbing one another in the name of brotherhood. We live at other men's expense, and then call ourselves heroically self-sacrificing for so doing.
(italics original)

This is stirring quote, posted by Café Hayek’s Prof Don Boudreaux, is from Frederic Bastiat‘s 1850 treatise, Economic Harmonies  based on 1964 W. Hayden Boyers translation. Chapter 12, paragraph 21

Saturday, February 23, 2013

Tanzania: A Case of Democracy Destroying Itself?

The great Austrian Economist Friedrich von Hayek once warned about the perils of democratic government,
And if a democratic people comes under the sway of an anti-capitalistic creed, this means that democracy will inevitably destroy itself.
Could this be the evolving case in Tanzania? 

Writes Lauren Bishop at the NYU Development Research
Tanzania looks an awful lot like a democracy. The East African nation has been holding multi-party elections since 1995, which international observers have deemed free and competitive. In Tanzania, votes are not miscounted, opposition parties compete actively, and the ruling party—the Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM), which has controlled the government since independence—seems to play by the rules.

But according to Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, NYU politics professor and DRI affiliated faculty member, Tanzania is in fact sliding down a slippery slope to autocracy, even as it maintains the trappings of a “transitioning” democracy. A working paper with Alastair Smith describes how Tanzania’s completely legal and institutionalized electoral laws are placing power in the hands of a small and increasingly entrenched elite.
Read the rest here.

Democracy has ushered in various despots like Adolf Hitler, the Philippines’ Ferdinand Marcos, or even modern day contemporaries as Hugo Chavez of Venezuela as well as Argentina’s Cristina Elisabet Fernández de Kirchner.

The populist idea that the "majority knows best" has simply been a fraud.

Monday, January 28, 2013

Singapore’s Gradualist Descent to the Welfare State 2: The Rise of “Consultative Government”

Last year I wrote about how the impact of inflationism in Singapore may prompt her to gradually embrace into the welfare state model
Crises emanating from busting bubbles have been frequently used to justify social controls…

Once the ball gets rolling for the feedback loop of tax increase-government welfare spending then Singapore eventually ends up with the same plagues that has brought about the current string of crises, particularly loss of economic freedom, reduced competitiveness and productivity, lower standard of living, a culture of dependency and irresponsibility and of less charity and unsustainable debt conditions. The outcome from politically instituted parasitical relationship would not merely be a financial or economic crisis but social upheavals as well.
It appears that the results of the recent election have partly validated my outlook.

From the Bloomberg,
Singapore’s ruling People’s Action Party lost a by-election with the widest margin in almost three decades, signalling Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong may struggle to claw back support as the cost of living climbs.

The Workers’ Party’s Lee Li Lian, a 34-year-old sales trainer, won 54.5 percent of votes in the four-way race in the northeastern Punggol East district over the weekend, a 10.8 percentage point lead over the ruling party’s candidate. That’s the most for a district held by the PAP since the 1984 general elections, according to data from the Elections Department.

Record-high housing and transport costs, public discontent over an influx of foreigners and infrastructure strains are weakening approval for the only party that has ruled Singapore since independence in 1965. Its policies, which have helped forge Southeast Asia’s only advanced economy, are now being questioned by voters, many of whom are looking for a government that is less authoritative and more consultative.
I say partly because this is just one development. It remains to be seen if such political trend will intensify.

Yet “consultative government” signifies nothing more than a façade based on the appeal to the majority (social democracy) to justify the use of force to attain redistribution goals

As the 4th President of the US and founder of the US Constitution James Madison in a letter to John Monroe wrote; (bold mine)
There is no maxim, in my opinion, which is more liable to be misapplied, and which, therefore, more needs elucidation, than the current, that the interest of the majority is the political standard of right and wrong. Taking the word “interest” as synonymous with “ultimate happiness,” in which sense it is qualified with every necessary moral ingredient, the proposition is no doubt true. But taking it in the popular sense, as referring to immediate augmentation of property and wealth, nothing can be more false. In the latter sense it would be the interest of the majority in every community to despoil & enslave the minority of individuals; and in a federal community to make a similar sacrifice of the minority of the component States.
And more signs of Singapore’s slippery slope to the welfare state. From the same article….
The prime minister said after the Jan. 26 poll that by- elections tend to be tougher for the ruling party, and he will continue to focus on policies for the longer term that may take more time to yield results.

Last year, his administration cut ministerial pay, sped up construction of homes and made permanent a program to provide cash and medical funds for the elderly and low-income households. This month, it said it will give priority housing to families with children and provide greater childcare subsidies…

The island’s population has jumped by more than 1.1 million to 5.3 million since mid-2004, driving up property prices and stoking social tension as the government used immigration to make up for a low birth rate. Lee, who has led the country since 2004, has also raised foreign-worker levies and salary thresholds to slow the inflow of non-Singaporeans.
Inflationism or the global bubble cycles will continue to bamboozle or mislead the public to the populist welfare trap which will only exacerbate the current political settings in Singapore and elsewhere.

Yet the gist of the problem hasn’t been free market inequality and or immigration, which has falsely been attributed to, but rather central bank policies designed to promote the interests of the banking-political class cabal through financial repression—which includes negative real rates regime and balance sheet expansions.

And the next step for Singapore will likely be a gradualist transition towards a deeper welfare state that will be accompanied by more regulations, more restrictions of civil liberties, higher taxes, protectionism, cronyism and invasion of privacy which eventually leads to more social strains

From the behavioral perspective, I’ll borrow from Italian Statesman and Political Philosopher Niccolo Machiavelli’s observation on why the welfare state deludes the majority or the concensus.
For the great majority of mankind are satisfied with appearances, as though they were realities, and are often more influenced by the things that seem than by those that are.
Sad to see one of my ideal place lose its free market or economic freedom luster.

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Quote of the Day: The Will of the People

What is the will of the people?  Whatever it is, it is certainly not without contradictions, illusions, misinformation, and wishful-thinking – just like a lot of individual thought. But as an aggregation of individual thought it is a construct used to justify all sorts of things. In some people’s minds, this construct has claim to moral authority

The will of the people is a construct that is quite malleable to the political purposes of whichever group is better at manipulation.
(italics original)

This is from New York University’s Mario Rizzo at the ThinkMarkets.com

Monday, November 26, 2012

Inflationary Boom Powers Phisix to Milestone Highs

Inflation is like sin; every government denounces it and every government practices it-Sir Frederick William Leith Ross

The Philippine Phisix hit a new milestone.
clip_image002

We are told that the “upbeat expectations” on listed companies aside from “macroeconomic” dimensions have powered the Phisix to the latest high watermark.

In reality, such comments signify as a descriptive narrative of the current events based on the self-serving or attribution bias[1]—or when people attribute success to dispositional and internal factors or skills and impute failures on external uncontrollable forces or on luck.

Here, rising stocks, in the purview of the mainstream, supposedly accrue from or has been construed as emanating from strong corporate performance and robust economic growth.
Other factors have been omitted.

Yet such comment can also be discerned as symptoms of the bubble psychology through the reflexivity theory which represents a feedback loop mechanism between people’s expectations and their attendant actions in response to the changes in the prices and vice versa as previously explained[2].

Surging equity prices, which lends to the impression of sustainability of the boom, electrifies and energizes public confidence which leads to greater and aggressive risk taking and vice versa. The bullish psychology compounds on the attendant action which accelerates on the momentum or the growing conviction phase. Such cycle occurs until the illusion unravels.

Record Highs: Things Don’t Appear as They Seem: The Venezuelan Experience

The popular wisdom, wherein valuations of stock markets have been seen as having causal relations with corporate performance and macroeconomic conditions, has been nebulous. This has been especially pronounced since the Lehman bankruptcy in 2008.

Venezuela serves as a lucid example
clip_image003

The award for the world’s best performing stock market in 2012 belongs to Venezuela’s Caracas Stock Exchange Stock Market Index.

With nominal gains or returns at an astounding 228% on a year-to-date basis, as of Friday’s close, the Caracas Index has been the clear runaway or unchallenged champion.

Yet, Venezuela’s economic growth as measured by the GDP has hardly been improving. Statistical economic growth has been flagrantly manipulated for political reasons and amplified through widespread price controls which essentially subdued statistical price inflation[3].

In the real world, the price of Venezuela’s currency, the bolivar, has now been trading FOUR times (!!!) the official exchange rate in the black market[4].

The public also expects the imminence of the 5th official devaluation, since Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez imposed currency controls in 2003.

Recent bond sales by Venezuela’s central bank sank to the lowest level in two years[5], which implies that bond investors have either been waiting for the bolivar to devalue or that bond investors have been pressuring the Venezuelan government to allow market prices to reflect real economic conditions.

Worst, economic figures hardly reveals of the diminishing standards of living experienced by Venezuelans through huge shortages experienced by the broader economy, which according to reports, are at record highs[6]. So record stock market comes amidst record shortages of supply of goods.

Also, Venezuela’s US dollar reserves have fallen off the cliff. The petrodollar fund has plummeted 60% from January 2012 and 93% in 2008[7] as foreign exchange continues to get drained. The depletion of foreign currency means that importers, whom have so far has been the key source of supplies of goods for the economy, would run out of resources and that this would compound on the shortage miseries of Venezuelans. 

clip_image005

Also, the growing scarcity of foreign exchange and expanding government deficits means that financing of the Venezuelan government would increasingly depend on central bank monetization. (chart from Tradingeconomics.com)

Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, despite having been re-elected for his fourth term[8], has been conspicuously running the economy aground with his policies based on “socialist revolution”[9].

Yet, Venezuela’s bolivar, bond and stock markets hardly chime with the official economic data.

Venezuela’s financial markets have instead been manifesting symptoms of an escalating monetary disorder from the deeply inflationist, redistributionist and interventionist anti-business regime of Mr. Chavez.

The surge in the Caracas Stock markets, thus, represents a ticking time bomb, whose continuance will lead to the eventual collapse of the bolivar and the Venezuelan economy.

In other words, such dynamics signifies as symptoms of the heightening risk of a full blown hyperinflation.

The Venezuelan episode essentially demolishes populist wisdom. In other words, to see surging stock markets as accounting for favorable “macroeconomic” conditions or to impute “positive investor confidence” would tantamount to a patent misinterpretation and analysis. In reality, Venezuela’s surging equity markets exhibits policy induced pathology which has been ventilated on the financial markets.

The other moral of the story is the showcase of the nasty or ill effects from “democracy” as evinced by the “tyranny of the majority”.

As the second US president John Adams wrote to John Taylor in 1814[10]
I do not say that democracy has been more pernicious on the whole, and in the long run, than monarchy or aristocracy. Democracy has never been and never can be so durable as aristocracy or monarchy; but while it lasts, it is more bloody than either. … Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide. It is in vain to say that democracy is less vain, less proud, less selfish, less ambitious, or less avaricious than aristocracy or monarchy. It is not true, in fact, and nowhere appears in history. Those passions are the same in all men, under all forms of simple government, and when unchecked, produce the same effects of fraud, violence, and cruelty. When clear prospects are opened before vanity, pride, avarice, or ambition, for their easy gratification, it is hard for the most considerate philosophers and the most conscientious moralists to resist the temptation. Individuals have conquered themselves. Nations and large bodies of men, never.
Hugo Chavez seems on the path to validate the admonitions former US president John Adams 
Leaning Against the Wind: The Fatal Conceit

Of course, the Philippines isn’t Venezuela. But the law of economics is universal.

Philippine officials tell us that under a low interest rate environment, they “will not tolerate asset bubble formation and pricing mismatches”[11].

But this represents arrantly an absurd and a self-contradictory claim. Social policies shape people’s incentives. People react to incentives provided by policies.

Artificial suppression of interest rates punishes savers and creditors and moral behavior.

Alternatively, such policies reward rampant speculation, gambling and heightened risk taking or basically immoral activities.

People’s time preferences have subliminally been redirected to short term oriented or high time preferences activities through spending and investment via debt accumulation, on yield chasing dynamic regardless of the risks involved and on financial engineering to satisfy the financial market’s demand for vastly magnified risk appetites.

In short, low interest rates incentivize asset bubble formation and pricing mismatches.

I have met several people who expressed interest (without my prodding in fact I told them to study first) to place in the stock markets simply due to the nugatory returns from bank accounts.

That’s why negative real rates has been a major contributor to the proliferation of fraudulent activities such as Ponzi schemes (the Aman futures as discussed last week[12]) or even to the current international Ponzi financing scheme of manipulating prices of the financial asset markets (bonds and stocks) through central banking QEs.

For instance, aside from the unsustainable banking-sovereign bond buying feedback mechanism engineered by central banks and governments of crisis stricken developed economies, and the explosive growth in global derivatives exposure, the shadow banking system have reportedly ballooned to nearly 100% of the global economy[13].

In other words, negative real rates regime and various QEs by major central banks has enabled, facilitated and fomented a massive inflation of dollar financial claims complimented by a build-up in the global currency credit system.

clip_image007
Yet more signs of market’s reaction to bubble policies.

The financialization of the US, or the rapidly expanding share of financial industry relative to the US economy[14] (top chart), appears to coincide with the systemic credit or total credit market growth, which now stands at 369% of the US GDP (lowest pane).

This comes in the face of the decline of “buy and hold” strategy[15] employed by US asset investors which concomitantly come under a secular declining trend of interest rates.

The financial industry, which has expanded based on credit inflation, seems to have shifted investor’s attitudes where the incentives to “buy and hold” have been reduced and where shorter time frame holdings of assets, and or perhaps a high frequency of transactional churning, have been encouraged through social (monetary, financial and administrative) policies.

In other words, the policies of low interest and negative real rates have been instrumental in spurring debt driven bubble cycles.

The fact that many people in the Philippines resort to superficial justifications, such as the Pollyannaish outlook predicated on claims of supposed macroeconomic progress, are indications of a bubble afflicted yield chasing mindset.

To suggest that low interest environment will not lead to asset bubbles is based the fallacious doctrine that views people as behaving like automatons, and where rules, regulations, edicts and decrees, have neutral effects on individuals.

This can be analogized to the self-exculpation act by Pontius Pilate[16] on the ordering the execution of Jesus by washing his hands.

This is also like arguing that getting drunk or intoxicated is not caused by swilling of alcohol.

Also Philippine authorities presume that they can identify or “lean against the wind” and put a freeze in due time, by pricking the formative bubbles. This presumes they have a full understanding of how everybody thinks and acts. They pretend to possess omniscience.

In addition, such authorities fail to explain how a reversal of such policies will impact the local political economy and the marketplace.

The Venezuelan experience shows that policymakers would rather tinker with, and manipulate statistics, to advance the Potemkin village of economic growth, instead of addressing the real concerns.

There are political aspects from which such policies have been targeted at or have an effect on (intended or otherwise). And reversals of such policies will likely go in conflict and produce undesired effects that may put in jeopardy the interests of the political powers that be.

Example, if raising interest rates will hurt the stock and bond markets, how will this affect the electoral odds for the incumbent’s handpicked members of his political party during the 2013 elections? 

Said differently, could today’s boom been designed as part of the incumbent’s political strategy to increase the odds of an electoral victory for his party?

The Inflationary Boom, Telecom Smear Campaign, Gold’s Revival

clip_image009
The reality is that the fresh landmark high attained by the Philippine Phisix this week has been propelled by a tailwind which brought about a 2.08% advance.

Unknown to most, Philippine central bank’s, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), has been the most aggressive in the campaign onslaught against domestic interest rates or in implementing credit easing among the ASEAN peers.

I previously wrote that Asia’s stock market trends have reflected on the direction of interest rates[17]

On the back of this week’s gains, the Phisix has overtaken Thailand’s SET with a 27% year-to-date return as of Friday’s close, and has been Asia’s third best, behind Pakistan’s Karachi 100 up 43.09% year to date and Laos’ Laos Securities 37.09%

clip_image011
Again, the Philippines among the major ASEAN contemporaries has been the most aggressive in adapting credit easing policies via interest rate cuts.

Many have even been speculating that the BSP will further cut interest rates to reduce the strength of the Peso[18].

As a side note, I think that the pronouncements by establishment experts on the prospective actions of the BSP acts seem more about implied lobbying through disinformation channeled through mainstream media.

The desire for credit expansion seems like narcotic addiction, which only will deepen the malinvestments which will have adverse repercussions overtime.

As the great Ludwig von Mises warned[19],
The point of view prevails generally among politicians, business people, the press and public opinion that reducing the interest rates below those developed by market conditions is a worthy goal for economic policy, and that the simplest way to reach this goal is through expanding bank credit. Under the influence of this view, the attempt is undertaken, again and again, to spark an economic upswing through granting additional loans. At first, to be sure, the result of such credit expansion comes up to expectations. Business is revived. An upswing develops. However, the stimulating effect emanating from the credit expansion cannot continue forever. Sooner or later, a business boom created in this way must collapse.
Recently, the Philippine government seems to be harassing or has been putting select industries in negative spotlight either for political reasons (2013 elections) or for financing or as political charade of “doing something” to generate approval ratings. Such actions doesn’t seem to signal “promoting competitiveness” contra mainstream suggestions.

Last week, the government through the industry regulator accused the top 2 private telecom firms as having “overcharged” consumers[20], stemming from last year’s directive to reduce interconnection charges which were supposedly meant as “pass through to consumers”. This has alleged been by part of “the directive to make text messaging more affordable to the public, pursuant to directives from the Office of the President”

The reality is that the Office of the President has nothing to do with “affordable text messaging”, claims of which represents no less than unalloyed propaganda. The laws of economics cannot be controlled by mere fiat.

The real reason why prices of text messaging and other mobile services have been plunging worldwide has been because of productivity enhancements from market based competition[21] aided by technological advances.

The fact is that the domestic industries’ inefficiencies have been rooted from interventionism mostly via overregulation[22].

Yet if the Philippine government sincerely desires to promote consumer welfare as publicized, the way to do is to abolish foreign ownership restrictions, the congressional franchise and the National Telecom Commissions (NTC) all of which constitutes anti-competitive laws and regulations and of the protection of the entrenched groups connected with political elite.

Previously stateless Somalia, ironically, has garnered the acclaim of having the “best telecommunications in Africa”, with about 10 “fiercely competitive telephone companies” providing wireless technology, charging "the lowest international rates on the continent” and the “cheapest cellular calling rates”[23]

Stateless yes, but highly progressive telecom industry.

The real point has been to discredit the telecoms company as part of the smear campaign to create a popular moral backlash against the telecom industry in order to justify the SMS tax, promoted by the IMF[24].

Telecoms, like the mining sector, have been used by the political class as a milking cow. And the government has been conjuring up phony moral excuses to forcibly extract more taxes from private companies.

Moreover, printing money or credit expansion will never solve a problem caused by regulatory inhibitions or anti-business policies regardless of what statistics say. Such views naively oversimplify a rather complex world.

Importantly, overcharging shouldn’t be just applied to the telecom companies, the table should be turned where overcharging should also be pinned on the extravagance and insatiability of governments to incessantly work on extorting more taxes from the entrepreneurs, capitalists and investors by using “social justice” as pretext to benefit political boondoggles.

As the late libertarian economist and founder of Foundation for Economic Education Leonard Read[25] pointed out as quoted by Professor Gary Galles[26],
In the practice of so-called social justice, the individual is ignored…Social justice is the game of “robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul.” This form of political behavior seeks the gain of some at the expense of others… it is the thwarting of justice that begs our censure.
clip_image013
Industries persecuted by the government have apparently struggled, been at the tailend or became laggards. 

So far, the inflationary boom which has been conspicuous through the outstanding advances by the Financial, Property and holding sectors, has failed to give these sectors a lift.

Nevertheless, much of what I have been predicting seems to be taking hold, as global financial markets shift into high gear towards a risk ON environment. The yearend rally seems in motion.

As I wrote last September[27],
I believe that the interim response from the FED-ECB policies, designed to prop up financial assets, will likely provide strong support to the global stock markets including the Philippine Phisix perhaps until the yearend, at least.

The mining index, which has underperformed all sectors, will likely expunge its year to date losses at least by the yearend.
I believe that the complexion of relative performances will change as the upside momentum deepens and should imply for a spillover if not a rotation. 

clip_image015
Given last week’s strong rally by gold relative to the S&P 500, including the seeming recovery of the S&P GSCI Industrial Metal (GYX) Index and the broad based Reuters-CRB (CCI) index, gold mining issues in the US as the Philadelphia Gold & Silver mining Index (XAU) should likely find revitalization soon.

This also extrapolates to the possible inflection point by the domestic mining sector which should just be around the corner.

While no trend moves in a straight line, which means there should be interim corrections, we are likely to see a reinforcement of the yearend rally which perhaps may get extended until the first quarter of 2013.

Again, all will depend on the actions of central bankers in the face of market’s ever fluctuating conditions.



[1] Wikipedia.org Self-serving bias




[5] Businessweek/Bloomberg.com Venezuela Currency Market Sold Fewest Bonds in Two Years November 20, 2012


[7] Eluniversal.com, Venezuela's liquid reserves down 60% in nine months November 23, 2012




[11] Philstar.com Banks feel bite of low interest rates, November 15, 2012



[14] Wikipedia.org Financialization

[15] Charts of the Average Holding period and total credit markets are from Dr. Marc Faber’s Deflationary Bust or Government Profligacy and Money Printing via Zero Hedge, Marc Faber's Chart Porn November 23, 2012

[16] Wikipedia.org Pontius Pilate



[19] Ludwig von Mises, Cyclical Changes in Business Conditions, Mises.org February 13, 2012

[20] Inquirer.net Text overcharging bared November 21, 2012





[25] Wikipedia.org Leonard Read

[26] Gary Galles Justice versus Social Justice Mises.org, November 17, 2011

Wednesday, November 07, 2012

Quote of the Day: Democracy Never Lasts Long

Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide. It is in vain to say that democracy is less vain, less proud, less selfish, less ambitious, or less avaricious than aristocracy or monarchy. It is not true, in fact, and nowhere appears in history. Those passions are the same in all men, under all forms of simple government, and when unchecked, produce the same effects of fraud, violence, and cruelty.
This is from second US President US John Adams in his letters to John Taylor (1814)

Saturday, November 03, 2012

Quote of the Day: If Democracy Isn’t Working, It’s Not Democracy’s Fault

The idea of democracy is sacrosanct. To question it implies that you are in favor of despotism and tyranny. Democracy fans conveniently ignore the fact that despots and tyrants are freely elected every year.

President Hugo Chavez retained power in Venezuela this year, winning comfortably despite running his country’s economy into the ground with his socialist revolution of nationalizing key industries, tight exchange controls, and price controls on certain basic goods.

As the European economy continued to lurch toward meltdown, French voters elected Francois Hollande in 2012. The first three things Hollande did were raise the minimum wage, reduce the retirement age from 62 to 60, and raise the top tax rate to 75%. A conspiracy theorist would assume Hollande is deliberately trying to demolish what’s left of the French economy with these policies.

In Moscow, Vladimir Putin was again elected president of Russia. Despite police repression and the thuggery of the previous Putin regime, pro-Putin rallies were much more popular than anti-Putin rallies. “This is the time to build a bridge to Putin, before the most talented people move out of Russia,” said curator Marat Gelman.

As the United States elections draw near, the incumbent president is leading or tied in the polls. In his four years, he has not really deviated from his predecessor’s policies that were generally reviled by those in his party. He has presided over the largest expansion in public debt in world history, with the result being economic growth that is the weakest since the Great Depression. And this guy is likely to win. If he doesn’t, his opponent will govern just as he (and the ones before him) did.

Those of us paying attention are left to merely sigh and roll our eyes, reminded of H.L. Mencken’s line, “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.”

Meanwhile, democracy continues on unquestioned. The politicians may be crooked, the taxes ruinous, the bureaucracy unwieldy, and the regulations outrageous, but the source of these outcomes is never questioned. The hope of democracy depends on the idea that all we need is the right people in power.

If democracy isn’t working, it’s not democracy’s fault. The problem is only that the right people have not been elected yet. This theory has been tested for hundreds of years and the results are the same, yet people still hope and believe. The worst rise to the top in politics, F.A. Hayek explained. To be elected, politicians must appeal to the least intelligent and most gullible. And because democracy makes politics and power available to everyone, it attracts those seeking status, fame, glory, recognition, attention, appreciation, dignity, and even dominance. The right people will never be attracted to politics, only the wrong people will.
This is from Mises Institute President Douglas French at the Laissez Faire Books on the popular delusion of the democratic utopia.

Friday, November 02, 2012

Video: Should Voting Be Mandatory? 13 More Reasons Not to Vote

The following video explains why mandatory or coercing people to vote will not be constructive for a society

From Learnliberty.org (thanks to Tim Hedberg for the video):
Professor Jason Brennan offers several reasons for not making voting mandatory. 

-Political scientists find that most citizens are badly informed. 

-Citizens appear to make systematic mistakes about the most basic issues in economics, political science, and sociology. People who would fail econ 101 should not be required to make decisions about economic policy. 

-People who tend to abstain from voting are more ignorant than people who vote. Forcing them to vote would lead to a more ignorant pool of voters, which leads to political candidates who reflect voters’ misperceptions. The end result is bad public policy. 

One objection to this argument is that the disadvantaged, the poor, the unemployed, and the uneducated are less likely to vote than other groups. Some argue that people should be forced to vote so the disadvantaged won’t be taken advantage of. Professor Brennan says this objection relies upon the false assumption that people vote for their own interests. In contrast, political scientists have found over and again that people tend to vote for what they believe to be the national interest. We don’t need to worry about protecting nonvoters from selfish voters. Instead, we should worry about whether voters will invest the time to learn which policies really serve the public good.

According to Brennan, bad decisions in the voting booth contribute to bad government; needless wars; homophobic, sexist, and racist legislation; lost prosperity; and more. While all citizens should have an equal right to vote, someone who wants to abstain from voting because he doesn’t feel he knows the right answers—or for any other reason—should be allowed to do so. Brennan concludes that mandatory voting guarantees high turnout but not better government.

 


If mandatory voting would not helpful, then refraining from voting could should be seen as an alternative. [See my previous posts here, and here.]

EPJ's Bob Wenzel has 13 quotes to justify non-voting:
1. If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal. --Emma Goldman 

2. The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don't have to waste your time voting. --Charles Bukowski 

3.Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom.--Friedrich August von Hayek 

4. Why do the people humiliate themselves by voting? I didn't vote because I have dignity. If I had closed my nose and voted for one of them, I would spit on my own face. --Oriana Fallaci 

5. Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil. Next time, go all out and write in Lucifer on the ballot --Jarod Kintz, 99 Cents For Some Nonsense 

6. Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance. ― H.L. Mencken 

7. Don't vote, it only encourages them. - - Old anarchist saying 

8. Democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the people by the people for the people. - - Oscar Wilde 

9.Representative government is artifice, a political myth, designed to conceal from the masses the dominance of a self-selected, self-perpetuating, and self-serving traditional ruling class. ― Giuseppe Prezzolini 

10. Individual rights are not subject to a public vote; a majority has no right to vote away the rights of a minority; the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities (and the smallest minority on earth is the individual). --Ayn Rand 

11. I have never voted in my life...I have always known and understood that the idiots are in a majority so it's certain they will win. --Louis-Ferdinand Celine 

12. No matter whom you vote for, the Government always gets in. --Unknown 

13. You want to know about voting. I'm here to tell you about voting. Imagine you're locked in a huge underground night-club filled with sinners, whores, freaks and unnameable things that rape pitbulls for fun. And you ain't allowed out until you all vote on what you're going to do tonight. You like to put your feet up and watch "Republican Party Reservation". They like to have sex with normal people using knives, guns, and brand new sexual organs you did not even know existed. So you vote for television, and everyone else, as far as your eye can see, votes to fuck you with switchblades. That's voting. You're welcome. --Warren Ellis, Transmetropolitan, Vol. 3: Year of the Bastard
I would add a 14th reason: It's not worth to risk one's life or limb to engage in a charade where the risk of political violence is high during election day.