Interventionism aims at confiscating the "surplus" of one part of the population and at giving it to the other part. Once this surplus is exhausted by total confiscation, a further continuation of this policy is impossible—Ludwig von Mises
In this issue
July’s Phenomenal Fiscal Deficit Pushes Government Size to Historic Highs as Debt Servicing Rockets!
-Bullseye! July’s Record Deficit Sends Government Size to a Record, Affirms the Socialization of the Philippine Economy!
-Breakneck Speed in Public Spending and Revenues Pushes July and 7-Month Deficit to Historic Levels
-July Public Debt Servicing Soars
July’s Phenomenal Fiscal Deficit Pushes Government Size to Historic Highs as Debt Servicing Rockets!
Bullseye! July’s Record Deficit Sends Government Share of GDP to a Record, Affirms the Socialization of the Philippine Economy!
The multiple records shattered by July’s fiscal deficit have led to a rocketing of the National Government’s expenditure to (nominal) GDP ratio, the largest since 1998
Lo and behold! The most earthshaking chart representing the political economic transformation of the Philippines: A Bull Market in Government!
Figure 1
As of July 2018, the public spending to GDP ratio hit 20.1%, 12.4% more than 2017’s 17.87%, and 17.4% above the 17.12% average ratio since 1998.
Public expenditures are supposed to represent recorded real activities, whereas econometric models which inputs are derived mostly from surveys constitute the statistical economy or the GDP. That being the case, an inflated GDP would understate the real contribution of the government on the economy. Or, the public spending or government share of the economy could significantly be more!
Besides, the public spending to GDP ratio represents a direct measure of the size of the government. This ratiodoesn't capture the indirect participation of the government. For instance, in many of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects, it is the private sector that spends on political projects. The $3.7 billion Makati subway project is an example.
Political interventions affect the economy in many ways. These interventions may impact prices, operations, distributions, and output.
For instance, the National Government (NG) restricts supply of the Transport Network Vehicle Services (TNVS) industry, as well as, imposes demand control through the price channel or the ability of these firms to set prices.
Having been stripped of entrepreneurial role through repressive and intrusive regulations, firms of the industry transform into quasi-managers or department heads of National Government. In essence, the NG directs the operating spectrum of these privately owned firms as extensions of its tentacles. The result of which is to weigh down the industry’s contribution to uplifting consumer welfare and generally on the economy.
The record deficit spending, which in part increases bureaucratic involvement (through the expansion of manpower, logistics and enforcement capabilities), has reduced output, employment, and capital accumulation for the TNVS industry.
At the end of the day, an increase in the share of the statistical GDP pie by the government translates to a proportional decrease in the participation of the private sector. A larger government entails a smaller private sector.
And because there is no free lunch, not only will the trend of record deficits supported by massive interventions shrink the productive sectors of the economy, it embeds higher taxes into the future, weakens spending power (inflation), underwrites the erosion of the domestic currency and upsizes economic and financial risks.
That said, the transformation towards the socialization of the political economy has now manifested itself in government’s statistics.
What I have been predicting all along has been validated!
And economic opportunities will increasingly involve establishing ties with the government at the expense of the marketplace. One has to be an insider or connected with the insiders.
Exemplified by the transition towards a centrally planned and centrally directed economy have been experiences of the PPP and TNVS industries.
What more if the proposed bill on the imposition of the 14-month pay to employees of the private sector, which has now been in the Senate’s third reading, be ratified? Would that not constitute the troika of rigorous labor mandates that would penalize the economy following higher minimum wages and anti-endo practices?
Sutton’s Law becomes increasingly plays a relevant role in crafting financial strategy.
According to Wikipedia, The law is named after the bank robber Willie Sutton, who reputedly replied to a reporter's inquiry as to why he robbed banks by saying "because that's where the money is."
The government is where the money is!
Breakneck Speed in Public Spending and Revenues Pushes July and 7-Month Deficit to Historic Levels
Let us dig down on the booming government bubble.
July’s fiscal conditions produced a stunning set of records.
Figure 2
July’s deficit of Php 84.4 billion was the largest in at least 11 years. A breakthrough pace in revenue and expenditure growth of 24.21% and 33.9%, respectively, crafted the July record, unmatched since 2009 at the very least. (see figure 2)
July’s phenomenal fiscal expansion helped set landmarks in spending and revenue activities over a 7-month period
Figure 3
At breakneck speed, revenue growth dashed at 20.52% while expenditure growth sprinted at a faster 22.57%. (upper window figure 3)
The outcome: the seven-month deficit bolted to a milestone Php 279 billion! The 7-month deficit represents 80% of 2017’s full-year Php 350.64 billion with 5 months to go! (lower window figure 3) Another deficit in the scale of July or March (Php 110.7 billion) would wipe off the gap in a month!
The National Government set a target deficit of 3% of the GDP or about Php 530 billion.
The 7-month deficit has accounted for about 3.3% of the first semester nominal GDP. At the current pace, the government’s programs seem on track to reach its objective.
Figure 4
And if the NG hits its deficit target, the spending share of GDP could be expected to rise by even more!
To emphasize, while nominal expenditures are about to break beyond the recent highs, revenues are currently being bolstered by the expanded tax base from TRAIN 1.0. (figure 4 upper window)
Or, authorities have programmed public expenditures in contrast to revenues which depend on economic performance as well as administrative efficiency on collections. More pointedly, expenditures are fixed, revenues are variable. A slowdown in the economy will blow the deficits through the roof.
The rate of current and proposed spending indicates that TRAIN 2.0, which should add to the expansion of the tax base, as noted before, will have to be enacted.
July Public Debt Servicing Soars
Since fiscal deficits are no free lunches, how was the July record financed? Has it been through debt or the BSP’s monetization or a combo?
The BSP and the Bureau of Treasury has yet to publish the relevant statistics
And the numbers are just phenomenal!
The 7-month debt service at Php 463.11 billion has accrued to about 94% of the annual Php 490.31 billion of interest payments and amortization spent in 2017.
Debt service as a share of total government revenues, which was at 28.03% in July, appears to have reversed its downtrend.
The debt service to revenue ratio hit a low of 19.83% in 2017. In June 2018, public domestic debt grew by 9.34%. The burden of debt servicing must have increased by the recent acquisitions of debt
At the current pace, the annual debt service for 2018 will likely approach Php 800 billion, Php 54.4 billion shy of the record established in 2006.
With rising interest rates and with record deficit spending in part financed by debt, the National Government’s debt service should be expected to increase significantly.
And rising financing costs will not only add to the deficits it will compound on the National Government’s competition with the private sector for access to people’s savings. Expanded debt and debt servicing should magnify the crowding out syndrome.
The repercussion would be to amplify upside pressures on interest rates!
And not only will the government’s broadening role in the economy require significant amounts of financing, it will bring about substantial rearrangement in the economy’s production and distribution structure that should affect earnings and the GDP.
Until it becomes evident, current statistics will hardly capture such changes.
Instead, what has been conspicuous has been the fast-expanding role of the government in the economy as noted above.
Nevertheless, government policies set the directions.
The monumental shift in the nation’s tax regime from income tax to a broad-based consumption tax is a depiction of such pivotal change.
As the record fiscal deficit and public expenditure to GDP shows, a government ‘investment led’ economy it is, to be precise.
No comments:
Post a Comment