Global CDS Review: Unclear Debt Default Contagion Causality

An updated chart from Bespoke Invest should provide us a better perspective of the actual state of the supposed concerns of "debt default risk" as the cause of the market's current turmoil.
According to Bespoke Invest, ``Portugal has seen the biggest spike in default risk this year with a gain of 145.5%. France ranks second at 87.7%, followed by Iceland, Germany, and Australia. Surprisingly, CDS for US debt has spiked 49.4%, which is more than both Dubai and Greece. (Why they even have CDS for the US and other large developed nations is a different story, and we're just highlighting where things stand.) While France, Germany, Australia, and the US have all seen pretty big spikes in default risk this year, they still have the lowest default risk of all the countries highlighted. Egypt, Lebanon, and Venezuela are the only countries that have seen default risk decline so far in 2010."

One thing to keep in mind is that reading market indicators, as the table above, can be reference-point sensitive.

As pointed out by Bespoke, even as Germany, US, France and Australia have topped the lists in terms of credit concerns (based on a year-to-date basis), as developed economies, their nominal CDS prices remain way below those of emerging markets.

So a spike in developed economy CDS could be interpreted as a nonevent.

Yet like Iceland and Greece, which used to have a low risk developed economy rating (see 2008 as reference), soaring CDS have placed them above many (high risk) emerging markets. So it would be a mistake to read past performances as indicative of future outcomes.

In short, the picture changes depending on the reference points used to justify a scenario.

Here is another example: Based on 2008 as the benchmark, Venezuela, this year's top performer, despite the incredibly high priced CDS, appears to be one of the least affected by present credit concerns behind Lebanon, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Columbia, Philippines, Turkey and Brazil.

I haven't had time to check, but my assumption is that most of the stock market indices mentioned above suffered as much losses as those whose credit risks have surged.

In other words, dissonant signals from this week's market meltdown do not suggest that this is mostly about "debt default" concerns. The contagion doesn't justify the same impact on least affected countries.

And it would similarly be too simplistic to suggest the following causal impact: higher debt default risk=deleveraging=commodity meltdown=emerging stocks freefall. This redounds to available bias and to the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy or as per wikipedia.org-"after this, therefore because (on account) of this".

Beyond the surface, we read that it is likely the squall that hit financial markets could instead be signs of affliction from a liquidity addiction based "withdrawal syndrome".

Emerging Markets Stocks Reveals Deep Value

The rapid selloff in the global markets has led to massive adjustments in corporate valuations in emerging markets.

What used to be deemed as "pricey" has now turned to near "fire sale" prices.

According to Jack Dzierwa, Global Strategist of US Global Investors (emphasis mine),

``First, as we’ve said earlier, it’s important to not lose sight of fundamentals, which in the long run will be the driving force in the markets. In terms of valuations, the trailing price-to-earnings ratio hit an all-time low of 6.5x in mid-October, with an equity risk premium of 1,100 basis points.

``It is likely that investors are noticing these compelling valuations, as in the last two weeks higher stock prices in the emerging markets universe have driven trailing P/E up to 8.2x. While these P/Es have risen, emerging markets are still trading at a 27 percent discount to the developed markets universe.

Current valuations represent signs of morbid fear than of reality.

As of last week, the Philippine benchmark, the Phisix, according to the table below from David Fuller of fullermoney.com (HT: Prieur Du Plessis) shows dividend yields at 6.36%, PE at 9.05 and P/B at 1.4., compared to Indonesia’s 5.31%, 7.11 and 1.5, while Malaysia 6.15%, 9.67 and 1.3.

From current depressed levels, it is without doubt why Templeton's Mark Mobius believes that ``I think the markets will rejuvenate much faster than many people realize"

I share his view.

Japan’s Nikkei As Indicator

Japan is on the verge of breaking down from its major support levels. The Nikkei closed at 7,649 last Friday, compared to its previous low at 7,607 in April 2003.

Northern Trust: Nikkei 225 Long term chart

Here are some of our observations.

One, in the last major attempt to move forward during the late 1998-99, the Nikkei lost about 61%. Today the Nikkei is down about 58%. From the summit, the Nikkei has lost about 80% since 1989. Thus the tag of the “lost decade”.

Two, a Nikkei breakdown could mean a bottom phase yet to be ascertained since 1989 which also means structural bear markets could last for years.

Three, a breakdown of the Nikkei could signify as a leading indicator to the fate of the US markets over the interim.

Lastly this is not to suggest that the US markets will do a Nikkei’s “lost decade”. While there have been some significant parallels, conditions are greatly different. As an example the lost decade of Japan was “insulated” compared to the more global dependent US whose recent bubble bust has triggered a worldwide contagion. Thus, any comparison of the Nikkei’s travails to the US is an apple to orange comparison.

The point is that a breakdown of the Japan’s Nikkei could likely mean more downside actions for world markets.

Focusing On The Future: the Phisix and the Philippine Presidential Cycle

``The typical US investor tends to have about 80 percent of equities in the US. The world of tomorrow suggests a much greater exposure overseas. In general, you should consider holding a third of your equities in the US, a third in industrial countries outside the US and a third in emerging markets.”-Mohamed El-Erian, When Markets Collide: Investment Strategies for the Age of Global Economic Change, co-CEO of bond-investing giant Pimco

Self development author Robert Ringer cites the work of the late Alvin Toffler in the landmark book, the Future Shock, where Mr. Ringer wrote, ``Toffler believed that at any given time in history, about 90 percent of the population thinks in terms of the past, 7-8 percent have their heads in the present, and 2-3 percent are focused on the future.” (highlight mine)

Applied to the markets, since only 2-3% think in terms of the future while 97% are merely trend followers or momentum players then getting “ahead of the curve” translates to focusing on the possible outcomes in terms of the future and positioning ahead.

Getting Ahead of the Curve: Focus On The Longer Horizon

Thus to be able to acquire such an edge we need to understand how to use information. Josh Wolfe of the Nanotech section of the Forbes magazine tells us of the three sources that we need to focus on:

From Mr. Wolfe (underscore mine),

``Remember this: there are three sources of edge for you as an investor: informational, analytical or behavioral. Having an informational edge—a legal one at that—is very hard today because bits of information are distributed (via bits of optically propelled 0s and 1s) faster and wider than ever before. If the world is flat then information spreads across it (through Cisco routers) with nary a ripple (like Crisco on a pan). And sad but true: those lacking assets connecting them to info (logins, laptops, and lit fiber) lack assets connecting them to investors. You need basic infrastructure for basic trade and e- infrastructure for ETrade.

``Now “analytical” edge is more valuable than informational edge because fewer have it. Scarcity has value. You and I can get the same information but I can analyze it differently, attributing different meaning and weight the duration or magnitude of information or expectations differently. Maybe I can analyze it better. But more investors and more funds means more efficiency and less edge. And many market players competing to surgically excise (and analyze) truth from information means you get paid less to be a “surgeon” in the stock market ER.

``Know this: the best way to have analytical edge is to have a longer time horizon than the rest of the market. If the market discounts intrinsic values to the quarter, having a variant perception a year out can help you find undervalued stocks. My friends at Fund-of-Funds say so. Yet, shockingly: they do as they do not as they say. They manage their hedge fund managers to the month (with monthly reporting)—the unintended consequence? Their hedge fund managers shorten their own time horizon to manage against redemptions and fund withdrawals—inadvertently eroding away their edge. But alas, lamenting “short-termism” seems to be the only long-term rant that stays the course.

``Thus behavioral edge is the one remaining true source of edge. Edge can come from understanding social psychology, the madness (or wisdom) of crowds and individual cognitive and behavioral biases. If you guessed “none” instead of “nine” you thought appropriately more like a sociologist than a mathematician.

In essence, Mr. Wolfe suggests to us to have access to the right information by having the appropriate infrastructure, to know how to process such information by adequately analyzing them in the context of the big picture and to understand social psychology and the cognitive or behavioral biases to take advantage of market sentiment.

The Phisix And The Philippine Presidential Cycle

For instance 2 years from now the Philippines will undergo another national political exercise known as the Presidential elections.

While much of the public have been speculating on who will be running under what party, we are interested to know how the Phisix responds to the election of a NEW president as shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6: Presidential HONEYMOON

The blue arrows in Figure 6 demonstrate of how the Phisix responded during the last 3 Presidential election years which spanned over the past 22 years or since 1986. All of them have been positive.

In 1992, when Fidel V. Ramos assumed the presidency under the bull market cycle of 1986-1997, the Phisix soared from about 1,100 to 3,200 in 1994 (about 190%). Of course this didn’t happen in a straight line. 1992 had a mid year correction but the HONEYMOON prompted bullmarket was jumpstarted anew when the New Year ushered in.

1998 was a baptism of fire for Joseph Ejercito Estrada, having been elected to the presidency a year after the Asian Financial Crisis imploded. The Phisix responded with a late but fierce HONEYMOON-Technical oversold bounce which resulted to a gain of about 127%. Unfortunately, because the bounce signified as a countercyle amidst a secular downtrend, the advances were momentary and lasted only NINE months.

The controversial reelection of the incumbent president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo came amidst the backdrop of a booming global equity markets. The Phisix jumped from around 1,430 in April to 2,130 in February 2005 for a 48% gain in less than one year to reflect the GMA HONEYMOON.

However, 2005 saw the US dollar stage a massive rally amidst another political controversy which hounded the presidency-the Hello Garci Scandal, thus the Phisix traded sideways for most of the year until the last quarter.

By 2010 Global Markets Could Be In A Recovery Phase

Of course, we should mull over on whether the external environment would be supportive of such HONEYMOON. On whether the banking crisis in the US would have been on a mend or if it could still be undergoing adjustment pangs as shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7: PIMCO Emerging Markets: Average Crisis Durations

According to Michael Gomez, Executive Vice President of leading global investment management company PIMCO in a recent article, ``Unfortunately for the U.S., the fallout is usually both lengthy and costly: historical evidence suggests that banking crises in developed countries take, on average, between four and five years to resolve. As Yogi so famously said, “It ain’t over ‘til it’s over.””

If we are to base the present crisis from the inflection point of the US real estate sector, then the reckoning period for the advent of the crisis could be pegged at February of 2007, see Figure 8.

Figure 8: stockcharts.com: US Real Estate Led Crisis

The NYSE Real Estate index (main window) turned nearly a quarter before the Dow Jones Financials (top minor pane), Banking Index (mid minor pane) and the Mortgage Finance Index (lowest pane).

So if it should take the average crisis in the US to be settled in a timeframe of four to five years, then 2010 would already mark the late phase of the crisis which could translate to a bottoming or consolidation of the US equity markets. At best, it could also start to exhibit some signs of recovery!

Another, if it takes 3.7 years for all countries to resolve the present crisis and 3.3 years for emerging markets based on the PIMCO studies of banking crisis, then it also means that most of the world economies would also be on the process of a recovery by 2010!

This posits for a possibility of strong kick during the presidential honeymoon phase, which also means that 2009 could translate to a springboard for a powerful presidential honeymoon cycle momentum in 2010.

Overall, the prospects of a recovery in the Phisix looks likely a sooner than a later proposition.

Crash and Meltdown Alerts

However, as a word of caution these three months are likely to reflect the most vulnerable months of global equity markets. Some institutions like the Royal Bank of Scotland and Morgan Stanley have issued crash or meltdown alerts last June.

It is not for us to agree or not with such dire outlooks. We have spilled so much ink on these horror stories. While I don’t share the outlook, it can happen. The important thing is to observe HOW OUR PHISIX WILL REACT if these events do occur and not to run to the hills to seek refuge.

At the interim, if the PRESENT DIVERGENCES in the Phisix-US/global markets CONTINUE TO MAKE A SIGNIFICANT HEADWAY even amidst the prospects of a “perfect storm” then investors could possibly start to price in with confidence the belief that we could depart from the rest of the global markets affected by the debt bubble bust stigma.

The best is to see the Phisix consolidate with an upside bias on a gradual scale regardless of what happens elsewhere. A sharp upside climb risk a volatile and deep decline that could wipe out all gains accrued. A good example would be President Estrada’s honeymoon.

Thus, we should see a meaningful yearend rally to mark the transition from the bottom towards a recovery probably from mid October thereafter-assuming no major crashes to impact us. Then 2009 should see a marked improvement from 2008.

On the worst outlook, a global crash could possibly bring our call for this bottom phase to a test.

Global Markets: Oil-Inflation-Market Correlationship…Where?

``Don't try to buy at the bottom and sell at the top. It can't be done except by liars.” -- Bernard M. Baruch (1870-1965), Financer, Speculator Statesman and Presidential Adviser

And they said the Phisix’s fate belonged to oil prices.

The prevailing perspective: high oil and food prices (or consumer goods inflation) = low stocks prices. Alternatively, lower oil and food prices should translate to high stock prices. It’s as simple as that.

Well, world oil prices got whacked this week, and along with it the broader commodity sector. Instead of a shindig, the Phisix got thrashed- down by 2%. We were not alone though. Except for India and Vietnam, virtually all of the Asian markets got crushed too. So misery loves company.

It’s a mix picture elsewhere. US and Latin American stocks were in a bacchanalia while most of Europe was mixed. Middle East and African stocks were mostly lower.

Figure 1: stockcharts.com: Oil and Stocks

Figure 1 shows of how world markets reacted to falling oil prices. While major benchmarks were up (center window) along with many emerging markets (lowest pane), the broadbased weakness in Asia was pronounced (FSEAX-Fidelity Southeast Asia- pane below center window and Dow Jones Asia-pane below FSEAX).

So the single dimension “cause-and-effect” deduction does not square up with facts. What is popular doesn’t mean it is real.

Reverse Coupling, Inflation From The Core and Current Account Deficits

``Only as you do know yourself can your brain serve you as a sharp and efficient tool. Know your own failings, passions and prejudices so you can separate them from what you see.” -Bernard Baruch (1870-1965), Financer, Speculator Statesman and Presidential Adviser

Finger pointing on policymaking is easy to do. Yet many analysts seem to forget that the global monetary regime functions under the US dollar standard system which runs on the fractional banking reserve system platform, whose underlying principle basically stems from leverage (reserves as a fraction of deposits).

Because the logistical agencies of the US monetary system have presently been undergoing severe deleveraging pressure, this has been spilling over into the real economy and equally reflected in the underlying asset prices which is likewise being felt worldwide see figure 5.

Figure 5: The Economist: Sinking Global Equity Markets

The Economist cites Standard & Poor’s estimates of the losses for the month June as having wiped out $3 trillion in global capitalization, mostly due to the horrific 10% losses in emerging markets.

And as we have been saying along-it’s all not about oil but a combination of factors from the softening economic growth, deteriorating profit outlook, rising interest rates and higher incidences of consumer goods inflation.

“Reverse Coupling”

Thus given these aggravating circumstances, the US Federal Reserves policies have been designed to keep interest rates at negative real levels considering the staggering amount of leverage built onto the financial system under the abovementioned environment.

And as we discussed last week in Global Financial Markets: US Sneezes, World Catches Cold!, this evidently could be the continuing policy thrust since authorities have in their radar screen the magnified view of heightened systemic deflationary risk. Apparently the central bank of central banks the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), have echoed the same risk and sees “inflation is a more immediate threat than deflation” (The Economist).

Hence, the Bernanke-Paulson tandem appear to be banking on a lower dollar and lever its economy through exports by turbocharging the economic growth to emerging markets via the transmission mechanism of US dollar linked monetary regimes and the expansion of the current account deficit. Essentially lower US interest rates have been stimulating emerging markets.

This excerpt from the commentary of Fred Bergsten, director of the Peterson Institute for International Economics at the Financial Times appears to corroborate our view,

``The improved US trade performance of the past two years is due partly to the substantial, if lagged, restoration of the country’s price competitiveness as the dollar declined by a trade-weighted average of 25-30 per cent since early 2002, reversing most of its excessive run-up during the previous seven years that produced unsustainable current account deficits exceeding 6 per cent of GDP. Equally important, however, is the continued robust growth of the world economy. Every percentage point by which the rest of the world expands domestic demand faster than internal growth in the US produces gains of about $50bn (€32bn, £25bn) for the US external balance. Weighted by US exports, foreign growth exceeded US growth by about 2 percentage points in 2007 and will do so by an average of about 1.5 points this year and next as decoupling persists. Taken together, these currency and comparative growth factors have already improved the real US trade balance, and hence GDP, by almost $150bn since 2006, with gains of another $150bn or so likely through 2009. (The nominal US trade and current account deficits will not improve as much because of the sharp rise in the price of oil imports.)

``The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s new Economic Outlook projects that more than 80 per cent of all US growth in 2008-09 will derive from continued strengthening of its external position. Exports have been climbing at an annual rate of about 8 per cent, at least six times as fast as imports. Unless domestic demand takes an unexpected further fall in the quarters ahead, reverse coupling of the global economy will thus have prevented the US recession that was so widely predicted and feared.”

So what you have is the US trying to utilize emerging markets to cushion its economic decline hoping that the global inflationary process from emerging markets would keep the US-UK deflationary forces at bay. However, the unexpected repercussion of this exercise is the risk of emerging markets to overheat and exacerbate the “inflation” in commodity prices particularly of food and energy.

An example, if you think record levels of oil prices have climbed enough to “destroy demand” in emerging markets, it’s definitely not showing yet. Car sales in June remained robust in India (+8%) Brazil (+30%), Korea (+9.2%), New Zealand (+5.5%) and Australia (+1.4%).

Inflation From The Core

If markets have been reappraising financial assets through policy actions shouldn’t it be the US that needs to be penalized more for its influential grip over other economies?

Yes, if you ask Doug Noland in his Credit Bubble Bulletin (highilight), ``I find it rather incredible that U.S. and European policymakers are increasingly pointing blame and calling upon their emerging economy cohorts to aggressively combat inflation. With the U.S. today stuck with intractable $700bn Current Account Deficits and European Credit systems still churning out double-digit Credit growth, the Periphery is not the root cause of today’s escalating global inflationary pressures. The global Credit system has run amuck, a process that evolved from years of Credit and speculative excess generated by, and tolerated at, the Core. It is today unreasonable to expect the Chinese or Asians generally to bring their booming economies to their respective knees to fight global inflation anymore than we can expect the Fed to tighten the economic screws to the point of balancing our Current Account and punishing the destabilizing speculators.

``Today’s inflationary dynamics have been developing for decades. Only discipline and stability at the Core of the global financial system would have stemmed the strong inflationary bias of contemporary fiat “money” and Credit. But the Core was instead egregiously undisciplined and unstable, setting the stage for the type of runaway inflation we are now experiencing. The Core came to love and rationalize asset inflation and consumption. The Periphery was forced along for the ride and happy to oblige.”

Of course, to a lesser degree the US dollar linked monetary regimes in emerging markets should bear some of these responsibilities for tolerating the US policy induced global inflationary environment.

Emerging Market Turmoil: From Carry Trade To Current Account Deficits?

On the other hand, perhaps the turmoil in today’s marketplace exceptionally seen in some emerging markets could be as a result of the shifting focus of the markets as the distortions from the carry trade in the face of heightened risk aversion fades while the market prices on the state of current account balances as suggested by The Economist see figure 6.

Figure 6: Economist: Current Account Balances Reshaping Asset Pricing In Emerging Markets?

From the Economist, ``ACCORDING to economic textbooks, the currencies of economies with large current-account deficits should depreciate relative to those of countries with surpluses. This will stimulate their exports and curb imports, thereby helping to slim the trade gaps…Increased concern about current-account deficits is also causing investors to discriminate much more between emerging markets. A popular argument in recent years has been that developing economies are less risky because, unlike a decade ago, they are no longer dependent on foreign capital. It is true that emerging economies are forecast to have a combined current-account surplus of more than $800 billion this year, but this is more than accounted for by China, Russia and the Gulf oil exporters. In fact over half of the 25 biggest emerging economies now have deficits. South Korea is running a deficit after a decade of surpluses. Brazil has also moved back into the red, despite record high prices for its commodity exports. Others such as India, South Africa and Turkey have had external deficits for many years.”

While some of the performances in emerging markets appear to affirm such theory, it hasn’t been linear. For instance, the Philippines have severely underperformed South Africa and Turkey both of which have had deficits even during the heydays of the markets.

The Philippines isn’t about to turn into a current account deficit yet though. Current account surplus is expected to narrow to $4.2 billion from $6.9 billion (Reuters) despite the expected broadening of the trade deficit to about $11 billion-highest in 9 years on higher fuel and rice imports and weaker exports. So the recent underperformance of the Philippine asset class does not tally will or could be fully explained by this theory.

Thus, if we read by the activities in the market, such expectations are likely to be wrong (we will turn steeply into a deficit) or the market is inaccurately priced (market is wrong).

For the Philippine setting my conjecture is that the recent bear market has been exacerbated by internecine politicking see Philippine Politics: The Nationalist Hysteria Over Energy Issues.