When the government passes a law, it must be enforced. The executive branch of the government then makes up the actual enforcement rules. It interprets the law and translates it into actual regulations.The ObamaCare law was 2,000 pages long. That is just the beginning. Now the executive branch is building on its foundations.The specific interpretations are published in the Federal Register, which is published daily by the federal government. It publishes about 80,000 pages of regulations a year. Each page is three columns of rules that can be understood only by very specialized and very expensive lawyers in a particular field.CNS news sent a reporter to interview Democrat Congressman Henry Waxman. He asked Waxman if he had read all 10,535 pages. Waxman refused to answer. He said it was a propaganda question. He refused to answer.You owe it to yourself to see one page in the Federal Register. Few Americans ever have. Go here. You will see a highlighted link: Today’s Issue of the Federal Register. Click it. You will see articles. Click the PDF of any article. Then read just one column. You will not have to read all three to get the picture. Multiply this one column by 240,000. That is one year’s output.
The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate hut at the longer effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups—Henry Hazlitt
Friday, October 04, 2013
Obamacare Adds 10,350 pages to Existing Regulations
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Chart of the Day: Obamacare Regulations: 8 Times Longer Than Bible
Since March 2010, when President Barack Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and its companion Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA), the administration has published in the Federal Register 109 final regulations governing how Obamacare will be implemented.These regulations add up to 10,516 pages in the Federal Register—or more than eight times as many pages as there are in the Gutenberg Bible, which has 642 two-sided leaves or 1,286 pages.
laws were most numerous when the commonwealth was most corrupt (or the popular variant: The more corrupt the state, the more laws)
Friday, February 01, 2013
How Regulations Deter Investments: The China-Europe Story
But getting your head around European laws and visa restrictions, as well as the fear that tough economic times could spark more political instability, make Europe hard to navigate for Chinese firms.In fact the surveyed firms perceive Africa and the Middle East as having a more favourable business environment than the EU.Chinese firms find EU law particularly troublesome because there is no unified inbound investment approval process and some member states have their own security reviews…Six in 10 of the firms surveyed were SOEs and the most popular EU country for Chinese investment was Germany, with France a distant second.Chinese firms asked for more support with the operational issues they face from policymakers in Europe and back home.
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Overciminalization from Environmental Laws
The growing web of laws that can land unwitting violators in jail is commonly referred to as "overcriminalization." These are not laws prohibiting fundamentally wrong behavior like murder or rape. Critics say these laws create offenses that violators often don't realize are illegal until it's too late.Punishment can range from a few hundred dollars in fees to lengthy prison terms. Some say the extraordinary expansion of the criminal code on federal, state and local levels leaves the public exposed to abuse at the hands of officials.'You take away the incentive for somebody to do something bit by bit by bit. It’s like peeling the layers off an onion. You can only peel so much and then you don’t have any onion left'- FIshing boat Capt. Terrell GouldWhen it comes to environmental laws, the states getting hit the hardest are the five that border the Gulf of Mexico -- Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida. Among them, nearly 1,000 laws criminalizing activities along the coast have been put on the books, Texas Public Policy Foundation analyst Vikrant Reddy said.While there is no concrete figure, there are an estimated 300,000-400,000 environmental laws, statutes and mandates believed to be in circulation nationally. Many can land a person in prison, regardless of whether another person, plant or animal is harmed.
By giving the government unlimited powers the most arbitrary rule can be made legal: and in this way a democracy may set up the most complete despotism imaginable.
Thursday, January 03, 2013
Vatican’s Scapegoating Capitalism
In 2013 in Illinois, motorcyclists will be able to "proceed through a red light if the light fails to change." In Kentucky, releasing feral or wild hogs into the wild will be prohibited. And in Florida, swamp buggies will not legally be considered motor vehicles.On Jan. 1, as crowds of people toast to a new year, more than 400 news laws across the country will take effect — and possibly improve life for some."The laws that state governments deal with are really the laws that impact people on a daily basis," said Jon Kuhl, a spokesmanfor the National Conference of State Legislatures, which tracks the bills. "Whether amending or updating laws or enacting brand new legislation, it was an active year."In addition to the new laws of 2013, more than 29,000 laws were passed by state legislatures this year, Kuhl said. Many dealt with healthcare, education, gay rights, child safety and the Internet.
We have more professional tax preparers in the United States than law enforcement officers (765,000) and professional firefighters (310,400) combined.But we need them. Consider this: in 1913, we had 400 pages of federal tax code in law. Today, its more than 72,000 pages.Fear of being audited has led to this boost in tax preparers.
I cannot accept your canon that we are to judge Pope and King unlike other men, with a favourable presumption that they did no wrong. If there is any presumption it is the other way, against the holders of power, increasing as the power increases. Historic responsibility has to make up for the want of legal responsibility. Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it.
Thursday, November 08, 2012
Quote of the Day: Business Advise: Get Lawyers and Lobbyists
If you run a business, get a lot of lawyers and lobbysists. He who writes the regulations will make a lot of money. He who does not will lose. Make sure you make the right political contributions and don't say anything critical of those in power. You will need a discretionary waiver of something, and these rules are so huge and so vague, the regulators can do what they want with you. Don't be the one to get "crucified" (EPA). We live in the crony-capitalist system that Luigi Zingales describes so well. Live with it. Political freedom requires economic freedom, taught us Milton Friedman. You don't have the latter, don't expect the former.
Friday, February 25, 2011
Philippine Corruption: Not Because Of Political Culture, But Due To State Capitalism
In watching the live coverage of the unfolding Libya unrest at the Al Jazeera.net, a news segment reported on the 25th celebration of People’s Power revolution here, in the Philippines.
Al Jazeera interviewed a local political analyst who said that the People Power has not vanquished many of the deeply rooted deficiencies, primarily corruption, in the Philippine society mainly due to “political culture”.
This is a vivid example of misreading the effects as the cause.
Where the definition of Culture, according to wikipedia is “the set of shared attitudes, values, goals, and practices that characterizes an institution, organization or group”, this only means that what has been represented as “political culture” is actually the embedded incentives that has shaped “the set of shared attitudes, values, goals, and practices” of society.
Obviously, corruption as a culture didn’t emerge mainly from tradition or religion, but from arbitrary “noble sounding” anti-competitive and redistributive welfare laws which has underpinned the local political economic platform.
Given the social democratic ethos of the local society, where government has been romanticized as supposedly the nation’s “would be” saviour, and where the failure to attain government utopia has been attributed to the lack of virtuosity, then obviously, but unknown to many including the above expert, economic dependence based on non-price sensitive political distribution of resources only nurtures and feeds on corruption.
This is because society’s main energy have been directed towards lobbying, in order to secure politically granted economic rents, instead of competing to satisfy consumers via voluntary exchanges.
And that’s how corruption emerges—by determining society’s winners and the losers, the politically granted winners rewards or shares the rent with the political authorities.
So the maxim “it is NOT what you now but WHO you know” encapsulates the operating environment under the political culture of overregulation and patron-client based corruption or state/crony capitalism.
Thus the expectations of a virtuous government represents as no less than signs of ignorance of how the politics of violence has and will always be wielded. And that’s why we keep getting the same set of recycled leaders to the dismay of the many wrongheaded deluded idealists.
The only way to reconfigure “political culture” is NOT to elect or put to power a virtuous central planner, which is an illusion and a source of sustained frustrations, but to divert the energy or activities of the population from politics to productive voluntary exchanges.
We have to remember that governments comprise of human beings who suffers from the same flaws as everyone else, i.e. subject to personal biases, lack of knowledge, operates on preferred networks and comfort zones, has their own distinct and most likely flawed perception and interpretation of events and etc...
Importantly politicians and the bureaucrats are also self interested agents whom are subject to personal preferences and needs—career, self esteem or etc…
The only difference is that they have the mandate to use force over us.
So the power to control and the human aspect of supposed “public servants” makes them vulnerable to asymmetric (patron) exchanges with select economic clients.
Thereby the only way to eradicate corruption is by reducing dependence on political power as means to distribute economic opportunities, which alternatively also means expanding society’s reliance on the price based market system.
We can start with the junking of many of inequitable and protectionist laws and streamlining of the others.
In short, let the rule of law and respect of property rights prevail, culture will follow.
Thursday, July 31, 2008
The Controversy Over Oil VAT (Visceral and Astigmatic Thinking)
``No government ever wants less government — that is, less of itself." Garet Garrett (1878–1954), Insatiable Government, American journalist and author
Populism is anything panacean.
Popular political demand has it that the lifting VAT on oil prices will provide relief to consumers.
No quibble on that- yes “automatic and short term relief” that is.
But, alas the thinking STOPS here!
Look at the table provided by ADB above (shown this last week).
Essentially this brings us back to square one- High oil prices but with a gaping fiscal hole! What was deemed as a solution complicates the situation even more.
Hence, what then would be the next item to blame? Will the next political demand be "Nationalization"? (Hahaha!-
One senator suggested that VAT be replaced with a hike in luxury items (particularly car sales). The honorable senator forgets the effects of high taxes on car sales: car smuggling or legal loopholes which has resulted to the recent brouhaha over “used” car imports from economic zones (see Diesel Roll Back For PGMA’s Sona, MV Princess of the Stars Tragedy, Economic Realities of Cagayan’s Used Car Trade).
Another venerable senator suggests "efficiency" in tax collection by curbing car smuggling. Wonderful, another ideal solution- yes (we agree)! But then again this is nothing new and has been a battlecry for almost every aspiring politician. Yet, such motherhood statements or grand nostrum of lack of “efficiency” goes back to the paradox of overregulation, legal loopholes and bureaucratic leakages and corruption.
So, in effect both Senators have been discussing solutions based on a chicken and egg perspective but don’t deal with the heart of the problem!
The principle of taxation basically is the funding of government expenditures (for whatever programs) derived from revenues levied from its constituents, us the taxpayers.
Rising government expenditures without the necessary funding will compel government to borrow and or print money which results to the deterioration of the national balance sheet or the fiscal deficit.
When government competes with or “crowds out” the private sector in raising money this raises the cost of money while at the same time reducing productivity which derails investments.
Over the longer horizon, if alternative options of borrowing and printing money under degenerating deficits become unsustainable, the government will again be forced to raise taxes furthering our economic agony of rising unemployment, lack of investments, higher cost of living and depreciating currency.
Yet beyond the public’s knowledge; the demand for “reckless” spending to accommodate populist causes could entail the risks of hyperinflation! You should look at the classic hyperinflation paradigm unfolding in
Tersely said, short term popular elixirs will only lead to longer term pain. A cure worse than the disease.
While everyone wants to be relieved of high oil prices and the burden of taxation, what people should realize is that cuts in taxes NEEDS TO BE ACCOMPANIED BY A CORRESPONDING DECREASE IN GOVERNMENT SPENDING.
What I am trying to say is that an abolition/suspension/moratorium of VAT should come with DECREASED spending and not shifting of burdens by imposing other taxes, which lead to more inefficiencies in the economy and avenues for more corruption.
None of our political officials have proffered such option because it takes away their inherent privileges of constituent dependency or the basic premise for their existence.
That’s why populism is almost always about intuition, vacuousness and immediate pacification instead of sound policies that ensures productive economic growth by accumulating capital.