Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Why Warren Buffett Loves to Tax the Rich

In a recent article, Billionaire Warren Buffett proposes, once again, to tax his contemporaries, but this time by imposing a “minimum tax on the wealthy”.

Does Mr. Warren Buffett truly practice what he preaches? Or is he merely a sly and sleek talking famous personality promoting a hidden political agenda?

Well it would seem that despite his progressive “soak-the-rich” class warfare rhetoric, in reality, Mr. Buffett has been averse to taxes.

Mr. Buffett’s flagship, Berkshire Hathaway, still has tax issues with Internal Revenue Services. The company hasn’t even been paying due taxes since 2002.

As the New York Post notes in August of 2011
As Americans for Limited Government President Bill Wilson notes, the company openly admits that it owes back taxes since as long ago as 2002.

“We anticipate that we will resolve all adjustments proposed by the US Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for the 2002 through 2004 tax years ... within the next 12 months,” the firm’s annual report says.

It also cites outstanding tax issues for 2005 through 2009.
In November 2011, Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary NetJets also sued the IRS for “mistakenly assessing ticket tax” to recoup $643 million in taxes

So Mr. Buffett hasn’t been pro-tax at all: That’s when taxes applies to his business interests.

And this extends to the way Mr. Buffett and or his company uses tax avoidance maneuvers. Harvard Professor Greg Mankiw exposes them
But on closer examination, one realizes that Mr Buffett never mentions doing anything to eliminate the tax-avoidance strategies that he uses most aggressively.  In particular:

1. His company Berkshire Hathaway never pays a dividend but instead retains all earnings.  So the return on this investment is entirely in the form of capital gains.  By not paying dividends, he saves his investors (including himself) from having to immediately pay income tax on this income.

2. Mr Buffett is a long-term investor, so he rarely sells and realizes a capital gain.  His unrealized capital gains are untaxed.

3. He is giving away much of his wealth to charity.  He gets a deduction at the full market value of the stock he donates, most of which is unrealized (and therefore untaxed) capital gains.

4. When he dies, his heirs will get a stepped-up basis.  The income tax will never collect any revenue from the substantial unrealized capital gains he has been accumulating.
In short, Mr. Buffett proposes taxing everyone else but himself.

Lastly, Mr. Buffett seems to be promoting President Obama’s agenda because he benefits substantially from them.

Mr. Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway had been a major beneficiary of the Wall Street Bailout

Writes Eric Fry at the Daily Reckoning,
During the depths of the 2008 Credit Crisis and stock market selloff, “Wall Street was of fire,” recalls Peter Schweizer in his expose, Throw Them All Out. “[But] Buffett was running toward the flames…with the expectation that the fire department (that is, the federal government) was right behind him with buckets of bailout money…Indeed, Buffett needed the bailout…Beyond Goldman Sachs, Buffett was heavily invested in several other banks that were at risk and in need of federal cash. He began immediately to campaign for the $700 billion TARP rescue plan that was being hammered together in Washington.”

“As the political debates surrounding the proposed $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) bailout bill heated up,” recalls blogger, Pat Dollard, “Buffett maintained an appearance of naiveté, an ‘aw shucks’ shtick that deferred to the judgment of politicians. ‘I’m not brave enough to try to influence the Congress,’ Buffett told the New York Times.

“Behind closed doors, however, Buffett had become a shrewd political entrepreneur,” Dollard continues. “The billionaire exerted his considerable political influence in a private conference call with then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats. During the meeting, Buffett strongly urged Democratic members to pass the $700 billion TARP bill to avert what he warned would otherwise be ‘the biggest financial meltdown in American history.’”

“If the bailout went through,” Schweizer correctly observes, “it would be a windfall for Goldman. If it failed, it would be disastrous for Berkshire Hathaway.”

Buffett’s “hard work” paid off.

“In all, Berkshire Hathaway firms received $95 billion in bailout cash from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Berkshire held stock in the Wells Fargo, Bank of America, American Express, and Goldman Sachs, which received not only TARP money but also $130 billion in FDIC backing for their debt. All told, TARP-assisted companies constituted a whopping 30% of its entire company disclosed stock portfolio.”

But these billions of dollars represented only the most visible portions of the bailout funds that flowed to Berkshire’s companies. Wells Fargo, for example, received “only” $25 billion of TARP funding, but it also received another $45 billion at the same time from the Federal Reserve’s Term Auction Facility (TAF).

image

Incredibly, Wells Fargo’s borrowings paled alongside those of Goldman Sachs. Throughout the crisis, Goldman gorged itself at every available government trough. The morally challenged investment bank borrowed only $10 billion from the TARP. But at the same time Goldman was griping about “being forced” to take the $10 billion TARP loan, the company was borrowing tens of billions of dollars more from obscure government lending programs with acronyms like: CPFF, PDCF and TSLF.

And that’s not all!

Amidst much fanfare and self-congratulatory press releases, Goldman repaid its TARP loan in June 2009, but only after securing $25 billion of government capital at a different trough. As we observed in a December 15, 2010 edition of The Daily Reckoning:

On June 17, 2009…thanks to some timely, undisclosed assistance from the Federal Reserve, Goldman repaid its $10 billion TARP loan. But just six days before this announcement, Goldman sold $11 billion of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) to the Fed. In other words, Goldman “repaid” the Treasury by secretly selling illiquid assets to the Fed.

One month later, Goldman’s CEO Lloyd Blankfein beamed, “We are grateful for the government efforts and are pleased that [the monies we repaid] can be used by the government to revitalize the economy, a priority in which we all have a common stake.”

image

As it turns out, the government continued to “revitalize” that small sliver of the economy known as Goldman Sachs. During the three months following Goldman’s re-payment of its $10 billion TARP loan, the Fed purchased $27 billion of MBS from Goldman. In all, the Fed would purchase more than $100 billion of MBS from Goldman during the 12 months that followed Goldman’s TARP re-payment.

Is it any wonder that Buffett’s $5 billion “investment” in Goldman Sachs succeeded so nicely?

“Later, astonishingly,” recalls Peter Schweizer, “Buffett would publicly complain about the bailouts in his annual letter to Berkshire investors, claiming that government subsidies put Berkshire at a disadvantage…”
And as previously pointed out, Berkshire Hathaway’s Burlington North Santa Fe has also profited from Obama’s energy (oil pipeline) policies.

In essence, Warren Buffett not only has altered or overhauled his winning investing formula from "value investment" to the political entrepreneurship of rent seeking by becoming Obama’s premier crony, he has been using Obama’s policies to quash competitors. It looks as if Mr. Buffett's tax increases have been implicitly designed to attain this.

[As a side note, maybe the Occupy Wall Street movement should consider occupying Berkshire Hathaway too]

It’s sad to see how Mr. Buffett seems to have condescended or has sold his soul to the political demons by veering away from the laudable libertarian principles embraced by his dad, Howard Buffett. Or perhaps Mr. Buffett’s string of investing success may have gotten into his head. 

image
Howard Buffett’s portrait in Warren Buffett’s office (courtesy of Business Insider’s Tour of Warren Buffett’s office)

Given son Warren’s patent hypocrisy, dad Howard must be rolling in his grave.

Monday, November 26, 2012

Quote of the Day: Golden Handcuffs

When the public had access to gold coins prior to 1914, individuals controlled banking policy. They also controlled government fiscal policy. They could take their coins out of commercial banks if they did not approve of government policy. This is why national governments annul or restrict gold-coin redeemability whenever a major war breaks out. They do not want to face the citizens' veto. 

With the repudiation of any gold-coin standard since 1914, citizens no longer understand the case for a gold-coin currency. They do not understand that widespread gold ownership was the number one restraining factor on the expansion of state power in the economy. The uncoordinated individual decisions of millions of people could overturn any government policy that required central bank inflation to fund it. The politicians resented this. So did the central bankers.

The politicians were under restraints: golden handcuffs. They decided that it was better to turn the money-creation power over to the bankers. The central bankers promised to buy government bonds at low rates: lender of last resort. This made the central bank the counterfeiter of last resort.
This is from author Gary North on the religion of inflationism-central planning versus free markets at the Mises.org.

Third Wave Politics: Secessionist Parties in Spain Gains Political Footing

In the information age, forces of decentralization will function as the key agents of social change.

In the realm of politics, such evolutionary transition will likely be channeled through secessionist movements.

In Spain, the secessionist parties of Catalonia may have just gotten the momentum that could trigger a potential chain of events.

From Bloomberg,
Pro-independence parties in Catalonia won a regional vote, strengthening a drive for a referendum on secession in defiance of Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy.

Catalan President Artur Mas, who called early elections to force the debate on independence, won 50 of the 135 seats in the regional assembly for his Convergencia i Unio party, down from 62, with 99 percent of the vote counted. The separatist Catalan Republican Left, known as the ERC, more than doubled its seats to 21 from 10. Two smaller parties that also back a plebiscite secured 16 seats.

Rajoy, weakened by recession and speculation that Spain needs a European bailout, says a referendum on secession is unconstitutional. Mas’s losses showed his bid for a mandate backfired, leaving him dependent on anti-austerity separatists to govern Spain’s largest regional economy.

“With a majority, Mas could have negotiated for all kinds of goodies to postpone the referendum but clearly that’s not an option anymore,” Ken Dubin, a political scientist at Carlos III University and IE business school in Madrid. “He was hoping he’d have a stronger hand to negotiate some intermediate status, but his bluff has been called.”

Rajoy’s People’s Party won 19 seats, a gain of one. The Socialists took 20 seats, down from 28.

Mas has pledged a referendum within four years. In contrast, the ERC would be willing to declare independence unilaterally in 2014.

The above developments reminds me of, and appear as gradual confirmation of the predictions of futurist Alvin Toffler as elucidated in his highly prescient 1980 book, The Third Wave (p.317)
National governments, by contrast, find it difficult to customize their policies. Locked into Second Wave political and bureaucratic structures, they find it impossible to treat each region or city, each contending racial, religious, social, sexual or ethnic group differently, let alone treat each citizen as an individual. As conditions diversify, national decision-making remains ignorant of the fast-changing local requirements. If they try to identify these highly localized or specialized needs, they wind up deluged with overdetailed, indigestible data…

In consequence, national governments in Washington, London, Paris or Moscow continue, by and large, to impose uniform, standardized policies designed for a mass society on increasingly divergent and segment publics. Local and individual needs are forgotten or ignored causing the flames of resentment to reach white heat. As de-massification progresses, we can expect separatist or centrifugal forces to intensify dramatically and threaten the unity of many nation-states.

The Third Wave places enormous pressures on the nation-state from below.
It is happening.

Vietnam’s Keynesian Property Bubble Bust

It appears that Vietnam has been enduring a bubble bust which somehow resonates with the China: aside from easy money policies, an artificial boom had been stoked by state owned enterprises.

First the bubble bust, from Bloomberg:
Office and retail rents in Vietnam’s two largest cities have slumped as a wave of supply entered the market at a time when slowing economic and retail-sales growth curbs demand for commercial real estate. The Hanoi market added more office and retail space since the start of 2011 than in the previous four years combined, according to property broker CBRE.

The average asking rent for top-grade central business district office space in Hanoi was about $47 per square meter per month in 2009, more than double the levels for the same grade space in Bangkok and Kuala Lumpur at that time, according to data from the Vietnam unit of Los Angeles-based CBRE. The rate was 11 percent lower at $42.01 per square meter in the third quarter…
Vietnam’s credit imploding real estate has been bankrolled by State Owned Enterprises. More from the same article
Real estate loans totaled 203 trillion dong ($9.7 billion) as of Aug. 31, of which 6.6 percent were classified as bad debt, Minister of Construction Trinh Dinh Dung told the National Assembly on Oct. 31, citing a State Bank of Vietnam report. A broader category of real estate-related loans, including property-backed debt, account for 57 percent of total outstanding borrowing, or about 1,000 trillion dong, he said…

Many of Vietnam’s 1,300 state-owned enterprises are reportedly facing losses because of their recent forays into property, said Alfred Chan, director of financial institutions at Fitch Ratings in Singapore.

“It is not obvious, if you were just to look at the disclosure, what the potential risks to the banking sector are if you just look at the real estate sector,” Chan said. “Some of this exposure could well come from non-real estate companies that have ventured into that sector.”

Non-performing loans at banks are “significantly understated” and could be three or four times higher than official estimates, Fitch Ratings said in a March report.

The central bank chief, Nguyen Van Binh, said in April the level of bad debt at some lenders may be “much higher” than reported. Bad debts in Vietnam’s banking system may have accounted for 8.82 percent of outstanding loans at the end of September, Nguyen Van Giau, head of the National Assembly’s economic committee, told legislators in Hanoi Nov. 13.
So far, the impact from the mini-bubble bust has only slowed the economy which likely means that the Vietnamese has ample savings to cushion the capital consumption from the recent bust. The average Vietnamese predilection for gold hoarding has been a manifestation of savings.

Or perhaps government’s statistics may not have been forthright 

clip_image001

Vietnam’s bubble bust has fingerprints of Keynesian policies everywhere.

clip_image002

Vietnam’s Ho Chi Minh Index (Bloomberg)

clip_image003

 
Easy money policy fueled a boom which got reflected on the stock market, the property sector and the inflation index. This bubble has been abetted by speculations by state owned enterprises. Some of which had been justified as infrastructure spending. The boom led to higher interest rates which eventually popped these politically induced malinvestments.

And the ensuing bust seem to have prompted the Vietnamese government to implement stabilizers in 2010 (see red ellipse) which rekindled price inflation.

The Vietnamese government’s interventions, which seems aimed at forestalling recession or preventing the market from clearing of the previously acquired malinvestments, has only delayed the economic recovery.

And the article above describes the symptoms of the capital consumption process.

Vietnam needs to allow market forces and the price signaling mechanism to function. She needs reduce her interventions by liquidating and or privatizing bankrupt state owned enterprises while simultaneously liberalizing her economy to allow entrepreneurship to blossom. Reducing government spending will also allow the economy to use scarce resources which should be channeled into productive engagements.

Chart of the Day: “Overcharging” Governments

I pointed out last night that we should instead put pressure on the governments for “overcharging” taxpayers for the provision of so-called “public goods”.
the table should be turned where overcharging should also be pinned on the extravagance and insatiability of governments to incessantly work on extorting more taxes from the entrepreneurs, capitalists and investors by using “social justice” as pretext to benefit political boondoggles
In the US, the chart below courtesy of EPJ’s Bob Wenzel shows of the “cost overruns” by select government agencies.

image

Governments recklessly and relentlessly waste taxpayer’s money. Yet the paradox is that the government penalize taxpayer, and simultaneously award themselves for such foolhardiness with even more resources extorted from the taxpayers. What is "social justice" as implicitly defined by the political class has, in reality, been a parasitical relationship enabled by mandated coercion.

I just hope that there would be a local counterpart of this chart.

Inflationary Boom Powers Phisix to Milestone Highs

Inflation is like sin; every government denounces it and every government practices it-Sir Frederick William Leith Ross

The Philippine Phisix hit a new milestone.
clip_image002

We are told that the “upbeat expectations” on listed companies aside from “macroeconomic” dimensions have powered the Phisix to the latest high watermark.

In reality, such comments signify as a descriptive narrative of the current events based on the self-serving or attribution bias[1]—or when people attribute success to dispositional and internal factors or skills and impute failures on external uncontrollable forces or on luck.

Here, rising stocks, in the purview of the mainstream, supposedly accrue from or has been construed as emanating from strong corporate performance and robust economic growth.
Other factors have been omitted.

Yet such comment can also be discerned as symptoms of the bubble psychology through the reflexivity theory which represents a feedback loop mechanism between people’s expectations and their attendant actions in response to the changes in the prices and vice versa as previously explained[2].

Surging equity prices, which lends to the impression of sustainability of the boom, electrifies and energizes public confidence which leads to greater and aggressive risk taking and vice versa. The bullish psychology compounds on the attendant action which accelerates on the momentum or the growing conviction phase. Such cycle occurs until the illusion unravels.

Record Highs: Things Don’t Appear as They Seem: The Venezuelan Experience

The popular wisdom, wherein valuations of stock markets have been seen as having causal relations with corporate performance and macroeconomic conditions, has been nebulous. This has been especially pronounced since the Lehman bankruptcy in 2008.

Venezuela serves as a lucid example
clip_image003

The award for the world’s best performing stock market in 2012 belongs to Venezuela’s Caracas Stock Exchange Stock Market Index.

With nominal gains or returns at an astounding 228% on a year-to-date basis, as of Friday’s close, the Caracas Index has been the clear runaway or unchallenged champion.

Yet, Venezuela’s economic growth as measured by the GDP has hardly been improving. Statistical economic growth has been flagrantly manipulated for political reasons and amplified through widespread price controls which essentially subdued statistical price inflation[3].

In the real world, the price of Venezuela’s currency, the bolivar, has now been trading FOUR times (!!!) the official exchange rate in the black market[4].

The public also expects the imminence of the 5th official devaluation, since Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez imposed currency controls in 2003.

Recent bond sales by Venezuela’s central bank sank to the lowest level in two years[5], which implies that bond investors have either been waiting for the bolivar to devalue or that bond investors have been pressuring the Venezuelan government to allow market prices to reflect real economic conditions.

Worst, economic figures hardly reveals of the diminishing standards of living experienced by Venezuelans through huge shortages experienced by the broader economy, which according to reports, are at record highs[6]. So record stock market comes amidst record shortages of supply of goods.

Also, Venezuela’s US dollar reserves have fallen off the cliff. The petrodollar fund has plummeted 60% from January 2012 and 93% in 2008[7] as foreign exchange continues to get drained. The depletion of foreign currency means that importers, whom have so far has been the key source of supplies of goods for the economy, would run out of resources and that this would compound on the shortage miseries of Venezuelans. 

clip_image005

Also, the growing scarcity of foreign exchange and expanding government deficits means that financing of the Venezuelan government would increasingly depend on central bank monetization. (chart from Tradingeconomics.com)

Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, despite having been re-elected for his fourth term[8], has been conspicuously running the economy aground with his policies based on “socialist revolution”[9].

Yet, Venezuela’s bolivar, bond and stock markets hardly chime with the official economic data.

Venezuela’s financial markets have instead been manifesting symptoms of an escalating monetary disorder from the deeply inflationist, redistributionist and interventionist anti-business regime of Mr. Chavez.

The surge in the Caracas Stock markets, thus, represents a ticking time bomb, whose continuance will lead to the eventual collapse of the bolivar and the Venezuelan economy.

In other words, such dynamics signifies as symptoms of the heightening risk of a full blown hyperinflation.

The Venezuelan episode essentially demolishes populist wisdom. In other words, to see surging stock markets as accounting for favorable “macroeconomic” conditions or to impute “positive investor confidence” would tantamount to a patent misinterpretation and analysis. In reality, Venezuela’s surging equity markets exhibits policy induced pathology which has been ventilated on the financial markets.

The other moral of the story is the showcase of the nasty or ill effects from “democracy” as evinced by the “tyranny of the majority”.

As the second US president John Adams wrote to John Taylor in 1814[10]
I do not say that democracy has been more pernicious on the whole, and in the long run, than monarchy or aristocracy. Democracy has never been and never can be so durable as aristocracy or monarchy; but while it lasts, it is more bloody than either. … Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide. It is in vain to say that democracy is less vain, less proud, less selfish, less ambitious, or less avaricious than aristocracy or monarchy. It is not true, in fact, and nowhere appears in history. Those passions are the same in all men, under all forms of simple government, and when unchecked, produce the same effects of fraud, violence, and cruelty. When clear prospects are opened before vanity, pride, avarice, or ambition, for their easy gratification, it is hard for the most considerate philosophers and the most conscientious moralists to resist the temptation. Individuals have conquered themselves. Nations and large bodies of men, never.
Hugo Chavez seems on the path to validate the admonitions former US president John Adams 
Leaning Against the Wind: The Fatal Conceit

Of course, the Philippines isn’t Venezuela. But the law of economics is universal.

Philippine officials tell us that under a low interest rate environment, they “will not tolerate asset bubble formation and pricing mismatches”[11].

But this represents arrantly an absurd and a self-contradictory claim. Social policies shape people’s incentives. People react to incentives provided by policies.

Artificial suppression of interest rates punishes savers and creditors and moral behavior.

Alternatively, such policies reward rampant speculation, gambling and heightened risk taking or basically immoral activities.

People’s time preferences have subliminally been redirected to short term oriented or high time preferences activities through spending and investment via debt accumulation, on yield chasing dynamic regardless of the risks involved and on financial engineering to satisfy the financial market’s demand for vastly magnified risk appetites.

In short, low interest rates incentivize asset bubble formation and pricing mismatches.

I have met several people who expressed interest (without my prodding in fact I told them to study first) to place in the stock markets simply due to the nugatory returns from bank accounts.

That’s why negative real rates has been a major contributor to the proliferation of fraudulent activities such as Ponzi schemes (the Aman futures as discussed last week[12]) or even to the current international Ponzi financing scheme of manipulating prices of the financial asset markets (bonds and stocks) through central banking QEs.

For instance, aside from the unsustainable banking-sovereign bond buying feedback mechanism engineered by central banks and governments of crisis stricken developed economies, and the explosive growth in global derivatives exposure, the shadow banking system have reportedly ballooned to nearly 100% of the global economy[13].

In other words, negative real rates regime and various QEs by major central banks has enabled, facilitated and fomented a massive inflation of dollar financial claims complimented by a build-up in the global currency credit system.

clip_image007
Yet more signs of market’s reaction to bubble policies.

The financialization of the US, or the rapidly expanding share of financial industry relative to the US economy[14] (top chart), appears to coincide with the systemic credit or total credit market growth, which now stands at 369% of the US GDP (lowest pane).

This comes in the face of the decline of “buy and hold” strategy[15] employed by US asset investors which concomitantly come under a secular declining trend of interest rates.

The financial industry, which has expanded based on credit inflation, seems to have shifted investor’s attitudes where the incentives to “buy and hold” have been reduced and where shorter time frame holdings of assets, and or perhaps a high frequency of transactional churning, have been encouraged through social (monetary, financial and administrative) policies.

In other words, the policies of low interest and negative real rates have been instrumental in spurring debt driven bubble cycles.

The fact that many people in the Philippines resort to superficial justifications, such as the Pollyannaish outlook predicated on claims of supposed macroeconomic progress, are indications of a bubble afflicted yield chasing mindset.

To suggest that low interest environment will not lead to asset bubbles is based the fallacious doctrine that views people as behaving like automatons, and where rules, regulations, edicts and decrees, have neutral effects on individuals.

This can be analogized to the self-exculpation act by Pontius Pilate[16] on the ordering the execution of Jesus by washing his hands.

This is also like arguing that getting drunk or intoxicated is not caused by swilling of alcohol.

Also Philippine authorities presume that they can identify or “lean against the wind” and put a freeze in due time, by pricking the formative bubbles. This presumes they have a full understanding of how everybody thinks and acts. They pretend to possess omniscience.

In addition, such authorities fail to explain how a reversal of such policies will impact the local political economy and the marketplace.

The Venezuelan experience shows that policymakers would rather tinker with, and manipulate statistics, to advance the Potemkin village of economic growth, instead of addressing the real concerns.

There are political aspects from which such policies have been targeted at or have an effect on (intended or otherwise). And reversals of such policies will likely go in conflict and produce undesired effects that may put in jeopardy the interests of the political powers that be.

Example, if raising interest rates will hurt the stock and bond markets, how will this affect the electoral odds for the incumbent’s handpicked members of his political party during the 2013 elections? 

Said differently, could today’s boom been designed as part of the incumbent’s political strategy to increase the odds of an electoral victory for his party?

The Inflationary Boom, Telecom Smear Campaign, Gold’s Revival

clip_image009
The reality is that the fresh landmark high attained by the Philippine Phisix this week has been propelled by a tailwind which brought about a 2.08% advance.

Unknown to most, Philippine central bank’s, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), has been the most aggressive in the campaign onslaught against domestic interest rates or in implementing credit easing among the ASEAN peers.

I previously wrote that Asia’s stock market trends have reflected on the direction of interest rates[17]

On the back of this week’s gains, the Phisix has overtaken Thailand’s SET with a 27% year-to-date return as of Friday’s close, and has been Asia’s third best, behind Pakistan’s Karachi 100 up 43.09% year to date and Laos’ Laos Securities 37.09%

clip_image011
Again, the Philippines among the major ASEAN contemporaries has been the most aggressive in adapting credit easing policies via interest rate cuts.

Many have even been speculating that the BSP will further cut interest rates to reduce the strength of the Peso[18].

As a side note, I think that the pronouncements by establishment experts on the prospective actions of the BSP acts seem more about implied lobbying through disinformation channeled through mainstream media.

The desire for credit expansion seems like narcotic addiction, which only will deepen the malinvestments which will have adverse repercussions overtime.

As the great Ludwig von Mises warned[19],
The point of view prevails generally among politicians, business people, the press and public opinion that reducing the interest rates below those developed by market conditions is a worthy goal for economic policy, and that the simplest way to reach this goal is through expanding bank credit. Under the influence of this view, the attempt is undertaken, again and again, to spark an economic upswing through granting additional loans. At first, to be sure, the result of such credit expansion comes up to expectations. Business is revived. An upswing develops. However, the stimulating effect emanating from the credit expansion cannot continue forever. Sooner or later, a business boom created in this way must collapse.
Recently, the Philippine government seems to be harassing or has been putting select industries in negative spotlight either for political reasons (2013 elections) or for financing or as political charade of “doing something” to generate approval ratings. Such actions doesn’t seem to signal “promoting competitiveness” contra mainstream suggestions.

Last week, the government through the industry regulator accused the top 2 private telecom firms as having “overcharged” consumers[20], stemming from last year’s directive to reduce interconnection charges which were supposedly meant as “pass through to consumers”. This has alleged been by part of “the directive to make text messaging more affordable to the public, pursuant to directives from the Office of the President”

The reality is that the Office of the President has nothing to do with “affordable text messaging”, claims of which represents no less than unalloyed propaganda. The laws of economics cannot be controlled by mere fiat.

The real reason why prices of text messaging and other mobile services have been plunging worldwide has been because of productivity enhancements from market based competition[21] aided by technological advances.

The fact is that the domestic industries’ inefficiencies have been rooted from interventionism mostly via overregulation[22].

Yet if the Philippine government sincerely desires to promote consumer welfare as publicized, the way to do is to abolish foreign ownership restrictions, the congressional franchise and the National Telecom Commissions (NTC) all of which constitutes anti-competitive laws and regulations and of the protection of the entrenched groups connected with political elite.

Previously stateless Somalia, ironically, has garnered the acclaim of having the “best telecommunications in Africa”, with about 10 “fiercely competitive telephone companies” providing wireless technology, charging "the lowest international rates on the continent” and the “cheapest cellular calling rates”[23]

Stateless yes, but highly progressive telecom industry.

The real point has been to discredit the telecoms company as part of the smear campaign to create a popular moral backlash against the telecom industry in order to justify the SMS tax, promoted by the IMF[24].

Telecoms, like the mining sector, have been used by the political class as a milking cow. And the government has been conjuring up phony moral excuses to forcibly extract more taxes from private companies.

Moreover, printing money or credit expansion will never solve a problem caused by regulatory inhibitions or anti-business policies regardless of what statistics say. Such views naively oversimplify a rather complex world.

Importantly, overcharging shouldn’t be just applied to the telecom companies, the table should be turned where overcharging should also be pinned on the extravagance and insatiability of governments to incessantly work on extorting more taxes from the entrepreneurs, capitalists and investors by using “social justice” as pretext to benefit political boondoggles.

As the late libertarian economist and founder of Foundation for Economic Education Leonard Read[25] pointed out as quoted by Professor Gary Galles[26],
In the practice of so-called social justice, the individual is ignored…Social justice is the game of “robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul.” This form of political behavior seeks the gain of some at the expense of others… it is the thwarting of justice that begs our censure.
clip_image013
Industries persecuted by the government have apparently struggled, been at the tailend or became laggards. 

So far, the inflationary boom which has been conspicuous through the outstanding advances by the Financial, Property and holding sectors, has failed to give these sectors a lift.

Nevertheless, much of what I have been predicting seems to be taking hold, as global financial markets shift into high gear towards a risk ON environment. The yearend rally seems in motion.

As I wrote last September[27],
I believe that the interim response from the FED-ECB policies, designed to prop up financial assets, will likely provide strong support to the global stock markets including the Philippine Phisix perhaps until the yearend, at least.

The mining index, which has underperformed all sectors, will likely expunge its year to date losses at least by the yearend.
I believe that the complexion of relative performances will change as the upside momentum deepens and should imply for a spillover if not a rotation. 

clip_image015
Given last week’s strong rally by gold relative to the S&P 500, including the seeming recovery of the S&P GSCI Industrial Metal (GYX) Index and the broad based Reuters-CRB (CCI) index, gold mining issues in the US as the Philadelphia Gold & Silver mining Index (XAU) should likely find revitalization soon.

This also extrapolates to the possible inflection point by the domestic mining sector which should just be around the corner.

While no trend moves in a straight line, which means there should be interim corrections, we are likely to see a reinforcement of the yearend rally which perhaps may get extended until the first quarter of 2013.

Again, all will depend on the actions of central bankers in the face of market’s ever fluctuating conditions.



[1] Wikipedia.org Self-serving bias




[5] Businessweek/Bloomberg.com Venezuela Currency Market Sold Fewest Bonds in Two Years November 20, 2012


[7] Eluniversal.com, Venezuela's liquid reserves down 60% in nine months November 23, 2012




[11] Philstar.com Banks feel bite of low interest rates, November 15, 2012



[14] Wikipedia.org Financialization

[15] Charts of the Average Holding period and total credit markets are from Dr. Marc Faber’s Deflationary Bust or Government Profligacy and Money Printing via Zero Hedge, Marc Faber's Chart Porn November 23, 2012

[16] Wikipedia.org Pontius Pilate



[19] Ludwig von Mises, Cyclical Changes in Business Conditions, Mises.org February 13, 2012

[20] Inquirer.net Text overcharging bared November 21, 2012





[25] Wikipedia.org Leonard Read

[26] Gary Galles Justice versus Social Justice Mises.org, November 17, 2011

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Infographic:Is the US government preparing for a civil war?

Is the US government preparing for a civil war or a bloody revolt?  

The Criminal Justice Major through the following infographic thinks that the seeds have been sown and that the risks are high...
 
Are the Feds Preparing for Civil War?
Image compliments of Criminal Justice Major Degrees

Quote of the Day: The Ultimate Resource is the Human Mind

It bears repeating – and repeatedly repeating – that there is no such thing as a truly natural resource. All resources that have market value possess that value only because of human creativity and effort. Nothing that we today regard as valuable “natural resources” – not land, not forests, not petroleum, not iron ore, not magnesium, not fish, not New York harbor, nothing – would be a resource had not human creativity devised ways to make that thing into something so very useful to the achievement of human purposes that that thing becomes scarce. 

And one happy consequence is that, having made some raw materials scarce by discovering previously unknown and economically viable uses for these materials, human creativity – in economies that are at least reasonably free – is set to work, by the very incentives that are ‘natural’ to free markets, at the task of making these resources less and less scarce over time. 

As Julian Simon so insightfully taught, the ultimate resource is the human mind.
(italics original)

This is from Professor Donald J. Boudreaux at the Cafe Hayek.

Saturday, November 24, 2012

Video: Should Governments Regulate and Intervene to Correct "Market Failures?"

In the following video, Professor Steve Horwitz at the Foundation for Economic Education explains the dynamics of regulations and interventions in the marketplace
"What regulation and intervention do is prevent markets from discovering new ways of solving existing problems and new ways of solving new problems. When regulation erects barriers to entry or other kinds of limits on market behavior, it cuts short this discovery process, and that leads to inefficiency and waste of resources." 

How Political Discrimination Kills

George Mason University professor and author of Myth of the Rational Voter Bryan Caplan has a concise but insightful narrative about how the diminutive Joseph Schmidt (1904-1942) overcame his physical shortcomings and became a famous opera singer but unfortunately political discrimination did him in.

Professor Caplan concludes:
As every opera fan knows, life is full of tragedy.  Sometimes people laugh at you for being short.  Sometimes people hate you for being a Jew.  Tragedy, however, is more than a matter of intentions.  Markets muffle the effects of bad intentions.  Governments amplify the effects of bad intentions to their logical conclusion.  Market discrimination gave Joseph Schmidt an ugly hurdle to overcome - but with some ingenuity, he overcome it.  Government discrimination, in contrast, deliberately walled off his every option.  He tried to escape, but there was no escape.  Governments driven by prejudice stripped Joseph Schmidt of his livelihood, then took his life.



Video: Murray Rothbard on Trade Balance and Government Budget

Many mistake the effects of balance of trade with that of government budget. Some do this deliberately, through the use of statistical ruse, to promote the mercantilist or protectionist agenda.

In the following video, the great dean of the Austrian school of economics Murray Rothdard tersely clarifies on such distinction and or dispels the mercantilist myth.