Philippine Peso Wilts Under The Unwinding Short US Dollar Carry Trade!

``The world is changing and how we measure that change economically and financially is clearly a challenge and an opportunity. We have seen a re-weighting of risk around the world, but the world itself is being economically re-rated and so we need an index that allows investors to take advantage of these changes. Indian companies will obviously have a place in The Global Dow as will companies from other emerging countries where we have seen an unprecedented economic emancipation over the past two decades.” Rupert Murdoch, owner Dow Jones, on the Global Dow plan, in Mumbai, India.

So what ails the Philippine Peso?

After a fierce rally following the Philippine central Bank the (Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas) BSP’s move to raise policy interest rates to quell “inflation”, the Philippine currency made a 180° turn and dived. The Peso lost 2.19% over the week to 45.13 to a US dollar see figure 1, Asia’s second biggest loser after India’s Rupee.

Figure 1: Yahoo.com: USDollar/Philippine Peso: Ailing Peso?

Local mainstream media ascribes the recent activities on several factors as foreign portfolio outflows “on jitters over rising inflation”, “heightened concerns over global economic growth”, “lower commodity prices”, “hedge against potential recovery in oil prices” and “low levels of liquidity” in the financial markets.

There seems to be some confusion about “rising inflation” and “lower commodity prices” (which is which? Isn’t rising inflation supposed to be represented by higher commodity prices?), aside from concerns about global economic growth as a causal factor to Peso’s steep loss (how does slower “global” economic growth translate to lower Peso?).

So from previous concerns over “inflation” to now “global economic growth”, media and the local experts appear to be lost on what truly is driving the Peso’s decline.

The Inflation Bogey Revealed

While it is true that foreign portfolio continued to account for outflows that have weighed on the Peso, we doubt if the premise is indeed ALL about “inflation”.

Proof? See Figure 2.

Figure 2: AsianBondsonline.com: What Inflation? Where?

ADB’s Asianbondsonline depicts of the Philippine Peso denominated sovereign instruments in 2 year (green line) and 10 year (red line) yields. As the chart shows, the sharp drop in the yields last month seems to be validating our arguments that inflation concerns have been abating as discussed in Philippine Economy: World Financial Markets Allude To Diminishing Risks of Inflation.

With LOWER food prices, which is our MAIN concern (over 45% of our Consumer Price Index basket is in food while energy is just about 3%), manifested by sharply falling broad based commodity prices, via moderating “global and local” demand compounded with supply side responses from market forces and from policy directives emanating from political pressures (subsidies, interest rate hikes, added investments and etc.), the falling yields reflected in Philippine debt papers have equally signified diminishing inflation risk over the interim.

Since government “inflation” figures represent past data, this accounts as a LAGGING indicator. So when you read of Philippine inflation rates nearing a 17 year high in July at 12.2% (xinhua.net), we should expect these figures to drop significantly in the coming months. In short, consumer goods and services inflation has peaked!

So from this angle, inflation as a risk variable hasn’t been the MAIN impetus for the Peso’s decline.

Slowing Global Economic Growth Weighs On The Peso? Not Likely

Now if the argument swings to one of global growth, economic data doesn’t seem to support such a premise either.

One must be reminded that the currency values are ALWAYS priced in pairs. That’s why currency markets function as a zero sum game because when one wins, the other loses.

This means that the conventional measure of the Philippine Peso is relative to the US dollar, since the US dollar represent as the de facto world currency reserve. This also means that if we allude to the world economic growth’s impact on the Philippines, then we must also account for how the same factors will affect the US.

Let us see how the downturn abroad has impacted the Philippine Economy…

According to the latest remittance trends, June’s money flows from overseas foreign workers set a NEW record in the face of a SLOWING global economy! (Yeah…“decoupling is a myth”??!!)

This from Bloomberg (highlight mine),

``Remittances from Philippine citizens working overseas rose at the fastest pace in 14 months in June as more people found jobs as nurses, seamen and engineers abroad.

``Money sent back to the Philippines jumped 30 percent from a year earlier to $1.5 billion, the highest since records began in 1989, the central bank said in a statement in Manila today. Remittances grew 15.6 percent in May.

``The number of Filipinos who got jobs overseas rose 33.5 percent to 640,401 in the first six months of the year, the central bank said today…

``Slowing global growth may limit jobs abroad as companies lay off workers and freeze expansion, reducing the amount of money expatriates can send home in the coming months. Half of the Philippines' remittances come from the U.S., where tumbling home prices, mounting job losses and credit restraints are threatening growth.

``Funds sent home by the more than 8 million Filipinos living abroad climbed 17.2 percent to $8.2 billion in the first half of 2008 from a year earlier.”

Remember, remittances account for about 10% of the local economy and have SUPPORTED consumption patterns in the Philippines. The fact that 3 of the 10 largest malls in the world are in the Philippines (see our blog post A Nation Of Shoppers??!!) could be seen as partly being propped up by these fund flows from our migrant workers. Thus as far as labor and financial links are concerned, the global economic slowdown hasn’t been reflected YET in these accounts.

Although it is true that the risks of a negative impact to remittances from a slowing global economy may have a lagging effect, as in the case of Mexico which reported a slight decline during the 2^nd quarter and the first semester of 2008 (Wall Street Journal), these would actually depend on the sectors from which our OFWs are exposed to.

According to the BSP, ``Filipino workers continue to be in strong demand overseas due to the diversity and quality of skills they offer. The conduct of bilateral talks with host countries also continues to open up new employment opportunities abroad for Filipinos.” (emphasis mine)

Much to our knowledge, health (caregivers and nurses) and science based industries (engineers) aside from education (teachers) could be seen as defensive sectors that are least likely to be affected by the ongoing economic and financial slump in the US, thus the seeming resilience.

Aside, as the BSP has noted, bilateral agreements has effectively widened the opportunities for more of our labor/manpower exports.

Paradoxically, it appears that the so-called “Peso-driven-remittance” premise formerly touted by media and our experts has vanished altogether! Why? Just because the Peso is down and seems not to be supported by the remittance flows doesn’t mean this has no contribution. This goes to show how media and the highly paid institutional “experts” frequently resort to specious analysis based on AVAILABLE Bias.

Might as well abide by Nassim Taleb (author of the Black Swan) advise, ``Don’t read newspapers for the news (just for the gossip and, of course, profiles of authors). The best filter to know if the news matters is if you hear it in cafes, restaurants... or (again) parties.”

Going back to the local economy, if we look at the performances of publicly listed companies, we hardly notice any significant slowdown. Yes while earnings fell (from a jump in input costs or “inflation” and from mark down on equity investments), revenues from business operations jumped!

This from ABS-CBN (emphasis mine), ``Companies whose shares are listed on the local bourse saw their total earnings fell in the first quarter of the year due to rising inflation and lower trading gains, a new study by the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE) showed.

``According to PSE data, the combined profits of listed firms amounted to P66.68 billion in the first three months, a 4.3-percent decrease over the previous year's P69.67 billion. The same study showed that their combined revenues expanded by 10.4 percent to P589.71 billion from P534.05 billion a year ago.

``The findings were based on the unaudited financial statements of 221 listed companies received by the PSE as of June 11.”

Of course past performance doesn’t imply the same prospective outcome, but the point is if the largest companies in the Philippines have been seeing strength in the revenue context, then a material slowdown (or even a recession) isn’t likely to be in the cards. So the world may go into a recession alright but we are unlikely to join the bandwagon.

Besides, except for the trade linkages seen via the export and export related manufacturing channels, which supposedly accounts for as the most sensitive or the weakest link to a global slowdown (ironically exports grew 8.3% in June year on year, and 4% from January to June over the same period last year), the rest of the other industries should remain resilient.

As evidence, we can get some clues from the latest export figures (Inquirer.net)…

``Exports of clothing and accessories, the second-biggest export item after electronics in June, were down 7.6 percent year-on-year at $172.33 million.”

``Other top exports in June were petroleum (down 1.0 percent at $138.71 million), cathodes of refined copper (up 97 percent at $122.16 million), and coconut oil (up 105 percent at $116.97 million).

So there…a downturn in global consumer spending is reflected through the decline in clothing and accessories exports. Meanwhile, agriculture (coconut oil) and mining and related (refined copper) industries should continue to experience robust growth. As reminder, agriculture accounts for a substantial-over one third of the Philippine employment profile.

Not only that…the ongoing economic slack in the OECD economies have been prompting more firms to consider the outsourcing avenue as a way of cost cutting.

In the US, investment banks suffering from the housing and mortgage backed securitization meltdown is seen accelerating the outsourcing of jobs or in the vernacular- “knowledge process outsourcing,” “off-shoring” or “high-value outsourcing-to emerging markets.

This from the New York Times (underscore mine),

``Cost-cutting in New York and London has already been brutal thus far this year, and there is more to come in the next few months. New York City financial firms expect to hand out some $18 billion less in pay and benefits this year than 2007, the largest one-year drop ever. Over all, United States banks will cut 200,000 employees by 2009, the banking consultancy Celent said in April.

``The work these bankers were doing is not necessarily going away, though. Instead, jobs are popping up in places like India and Eastern Europe, often where healthier local markets exist.

``In addition to moving some lower-level banking and research positions to support bankers and analysts in New York and London, firms are shipping some of their top bankers from those cities to faster-growing developing markets to handle clients there…

``After research, the next wave may include more sophisticated jobs like the creation of derivative products, quantitative trading models and even sales jobs from the trading floors.

``Proponents of the change say Wall Street’s wary embrace of the activity may signal the beginning of a profound shift in the way investment banks are structured, with everyone but the top deal makers, client representatives and the bank management permanently relocated to cheaper locales like India, the Philippines and Eastern Europe.”

We don’t like to sound like engaging in a schadenfraude but the article message is crystal clear-someone’s loss is somebody’s gain; very much like the tradeoff between the Peso and the US dollar.

So, in addition to the milestone remittance volume in June and the prospects of a lower “inflation”, plus a calibrated upswing in the rest of the other industries economic growth figures to the upside (Government expects the country to grow by 5.7% for the year (inquirer.net))!!!

Figure 3: San Francisco Federal Reserve: World Real Economic Growth and US Real GDP

So under the context of economic growth, we don’t expect the US to OUTPERFORM emerging markets including the Philippines, as shown in Figure 3 from the San Francisco Federal Reserve even under a very OPTIMISTIC scenario of a NO-recession economic recovery in the US (right pane), an outlook which seems as questionable for us.

Besides, even under a moderation in economic growth it is unlikely that emerging markets will undergo the same penance as those in the debt to the eyeballs OECD economies. Even during the Dot.com bust of 2000-2002, emerging markets contributed 75% to the world economic growth as seen on the left pane. Lately, the emerging countries or developing countries accounted for almost 70% of world real GDP and should remain as an important driver going forward.

Thus, the recent fall by the Peso isn’t also supported by the slow economic growth thesis.

The Unraveling Short US Dollar Carry Trade!

So if it is not inflation and it is not slowing global economic growth then what is?

The recent strength of the US dollar hasn’t been a Philippine Peso only phenomenon. It has been a broad based rally seen in Asia (except Indonesia) including the redoubtable Singapore or for much of the world as shown in Figure 3 as measured by the US dollar “trade weighted” Index.

Figure 4: stockcharts.com: US dollar rally

As shown in Figure 4 the US dollar (main window) has massively rallied against its major trading partners (except the Canadian Loonie) which apparently coincided with the collapse of commodity prices, CRB Index (pane below main window), Gold (pane below CRB) and Oil prices (lowest pane).

While others have imputed these to “deflationary” pressures which may be partly responsible for the recent events, but has been inconsistent with the activities seen in the equity markets, we think that today’s volatile actions in the currency market signify the rotating process of “deleveraging”.

Perma bears cheerfully claim that the breakdown of commodities signifies a collapse in EM demand-which we think is unproven yet- and not evident in the Philippines anyway.

While others may call it the “global margin call” we call it the unwinding “short US dollar carry trade”.

Said differently, the US dollar has almost functioned as a ONE WAY BET or one huge crowded trade where international investors have massively “borrowed” against (because of relative lower rates) or “shorted” the US dollar (in expectations of a lower US dollar because of the years of continued decline) to buy commodities or emerging market assets or ex-US currencies in the hunt for added yields.

When central banks intervened (as we pointed out in Global Markets: The End Of The World? Or Overestimating Global Consequences?) to put a floor on the US dollar, the entire short US dollar short phenomenon unraveled spectacularly!

The attendant margin calls from the US dollar carry spurred forced liquidations in the positions of the commodity trade or in emerging markets or even among the currencies of the major trading partners of the US which had morphed into a dysfunctional rout. Hence, the almost synchronous inverse actions of the US dollar relative to commodities and the rapid disorderly panic stricken selloffs involving many currencies including the Philippine Peso!

This has not been a new phenomenon. About a year earlier, the advent of the credit crisis resulted to a wallop in global equity assets as many financial institutions who were caught in the subprime mortgage shakeout were compelled to raise capital via forcible liquidations. Most of these were vented in the global equity markets including the Philippine Stock Exchange.

We are seeing it happen today again, but this time involving ex-US assets. Hence the rotating disorder of delevaraging from a system that greatly relies on leveraging.

In May of 2006, the Gavekal Team wrote about the parallelism of a short US dollar phenomenon which had contributed to the imbalances or bubble formation that became what is known as the Asian Crisis (emphasis ours)…

``We had an echo of this very same phenomenon in Asia in the period 1995 to 2000. In 1995, everyone was convinced that the THB, MYR, KRW were massively undervalued and due a large revaluation. Everyone borrowed US$ (since rates were cheaper than local rates) to finance local projects (usually real estate). As money continued to plow in, returns on capital weakened. Soon the returns on capital moved below its cost and Asian currencies were forced to devalue. Asian banks, and the OECD banks that had lent to them, found themselves de facto “short the US$”. As Asia repaid its US$ borrowing in the period 1997-2000, the US$ rose higher than anyone expected (including ourselves) and central bank reserves barely grew (despite large current account deficits).”

Deleveraging and Probable Policy Goals Behind Interventions

The process of forcible liquidations almost always involves indiscriminate selling regardless of the fundamentals of an asset. This is because the antecedent of deleveraging is overleveraging which constitutes inflation, excessive speculation and reckless risk taking.

And deleveraging of overvalued or overextended markets means raising capital to fund margin deficits by closing out positions which usually is directed at the most liquid or most profitable positions. Hence deleveraging is commonly seen within a universe of a specified asset class. In today’s case: currencies and commodities.

Even gold, which traditionally functioned as hedge against volatility, inflation or financial or economic distress, became a downright victim to the latest market carnage.

An added view is our suspicion of the coordinated Central Bank-government efforts to prop the US dollar to force down commodity prices so as to reflect a peak in “inflation”, thereby relieving them of the political pressures from the responsibilities of policy errors (e.g. Biofuel subsidies).

Also we suspect that the same political forces could be conditioning markets for further policy easing measures (more rate cuts) in view of the still recalcitrant gridlock in the credit markets whose adverse impact has begun to spread into the real economy.

Finally in understanding of the guiding principles of US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke policymaking, it is likely that such actions could have been designed to bolster or cushion equity markets especially under the seasonal conditions of August to October which have been prone to “crashes”!

In 2000, Chairman Ben Bernanke wrote a treatise entitled “A Crash Course for Central Bankers” which we quote Mr. Bernanke…

``There’s no denying that a collapse in stock prices today would pose serious macroeconomic challenges for the United States. Consumer spending would slow, and the U.S. economy would become less of a magnet for foreign investors. Economic growth, which in any case has recently been at unsustainable levels, would decline somewhat. History proves, however, that a smart central bank can protect the economy and the financial sector from the nastier side effects of a stock market collapse.”

Figure 5: BBC US Market Crashes Through Ages

Figure 5 which we featured almost at the same time last year (see A “Normal” Correction in the FACE of Massive Government Interventions? No Can Do!) exhibits the worst crashes and bear markets in the US.

Given the cognizance of the unfolding weaknesses in the economy, US markets could be deemed as sensitive or vulnerable to a stock market crash, hence Mr. Bernanke alongside with other central banks could be attempting to create conditions that could avoid a similar situational risk.

Conclusion

In finale, we don’t share the mainstream view that the Philippine Peso’s recent downside jolt emanates from either the popular premises of being “inflation” impacted or as corollary to a global economic slowdown, both of which seems to have inadequate evidences and rests on tenuous logic in support such claims.

Much of the inter-market activities reflect on the process of deleveraging from an overextended-ONE way bet market (US DOLLAR) that has led to unruly forcible liquidations involving cross volatilities in the currency and commodity markets.

We suspect that political entities have had a hand in the present market actions were aimed at mitigating the political cost owing to adverse impacts of policy errors or US policymakers could be conditioning global financial markets for further policy easing measures (more rate cuts) or that alleged market intervention had been designed to bolster or cushion equity markets especially under the seasonal conditions of August to October which have been prone to “crashes”!

We further suspect that the unfounded serial bouts of forced selling should also translate to opportunities similar to that seen in the Phisix-that the Philippine Peso should rebound after the smoke from the battle clears.

Focusing On The Future: the Phisix and the Philippine Presidential Cycle

``The typical US investor tends to have about 80 percent of equities in the US. The world of tomorrow suggests a much greater exposure overseas. In general, you should consider holding a third of your equities in the US, a third in industrial countries outside the US and a third in emerging markets.”-Mohamed El-Erian, When Markets Collide: Investment Strategies for the Age of Global Economic Change, co-CEO of bond-investing giant Pimco

Self development author Robert Ringer cites the work of the late Alvin Toffler in the landmark book, the Future Shock, where Mr. Ringer wrote, ``Toffler believed that at any given time in history, about 90 percent of the population thinks in terms of the past, 7-8 percent have their heads in the present, and 2-3 percent are focused on the future.” (highlight mine)

Applied to the markets, since only 2-3% think in terms of the future while 97% are merely trend followers or momentum players then getting “ahead of the curve” translates to focusing on the possible outcomes in terms of the future and positioning ahead.

Getting Ahead of the Curve: Focus On The Longer Horizon

Thus to be able to acquire such an edge we need to understand how to use information. Josh Wolfe of the Nanotech section of the Forbes magazine tells us of the three sources that we need to focus on:

From Mr. Wolfe (underscore mine),

``Remember this: there are three sources of edge for you as an investor: informational, analytical or behavioral. Having an informational edge—a legal one at that—is very hard today because bits of information are distributed (via bits of optically propelled 0s and 1s) faster and wider than ever before. If the world is flat then information spreads across it (through Cisco routers) with nary a ripple (like Crisco on a pan). And sad but true: those lacking assets connecting them to info (logins, laptops, and lit fiber) lack assets connecting them to investors. You need basic infrastructure for basic trade and e- infrastructure for ETrade.

``Now “analytical” edge is more valuable than informational edge because fewer have it. Scarcity has value. You and I can get the same information but I can analyze it differently, attributing different meaning and weight the duration or magnitude of information or expectations differently. Maybe I can analyze it better. But more investors and more funds means more efficiency and less edge. And many market players competing to surgically excise (and analyze) truth from information means you get paid less to be a “surgeon” in the stock market ER.

``Know this: the best way to have analytical edge is to have a longer time horizon than the rest of the market. If the market discounts intrinsic values to the quarter, having a variant perception a year out can help you find undervalued stocks. My friends at Fund-of-Funds say so. Yet, shockingly: they do as they do not as they say. They manage their hedge fund managers to the month (with monthly reporting)—the unintended consequence? Their hedge fund managers shorten their own time horizon to manage against redemptions and fund withdrawals—inadvertently eroding away their edge. But alas, lamenting “short-termism” seems to be the only long-term rant that stays the course.

``Thus behavioral edge is the one remaining true source of edge. Edge can come from understanding social psychology, the madness (or wisdom) of crowds and individual cognitive and behavioral biases. If you guessed “none” instead of “nine” you thought appropriately more like a sociologist than a mathematician.

In essence, Mr. Wolfe suggests to us to have access to the right information by having the appropriate infrastructure, to know how to process such information by adequately analyzing them in the context of the big picture and to understand social psychology and the cognitive or behavioral biases to take advantage of market sentiment.

The Phisix And The Philippine Presidential Cycle

For instance 2 years from now the Philippines will undergo another national political exercise known as the Presidential elections.

While much of the public have been speculating on who will be running under what party, we are interested to know how the Phisix responds to the election of a NEW president as shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6: Presidential HONEYMOON

The blue arrows in Figure 6 demonstrate of how the Phisix responded during the last 3 Presidential election years which spanned over the past 22 years or since 1986. All of them have been positive.

In 1992, when Fidel V. Ramos assumed the presidency under the bull market cycle of 1986-1997, the Phisix soared from about 1,100 to 3,200 in 1994 (about 190%). Of course this didn’t happen in a straight line. 1992 had a mid year correction but the HONEYMOON prompted bullmarket was jumpstarted anew when the New Year ushered in.

1998 was a baptism of fire for Joseph Ejercito Estrada, having been elected to the presidency a year after the Asian Financial Crisis imploded. The Phisix responded with a late but fierce HONEYMOON-Technical oversold bounce which resulted to a gain of about 127%. Unfortunately, because the bounce signified as a countercyle amidst a secular downtrend, the advances were momentary and lasted only NINE months.

The controversial reelection of the incumbent president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo came amidst the backdrop of a booming global equity markets. The Phisix jumped from around 1,430 in April to 2,130 in February 2005 for a 48% gain in less than one year to reflect the GMA HONEYMOON.

However, 2005 saw the US dollar stage a massive rally amidst another political controversy which hounded the presidency-the Hello Garci Scandal, thus the Phisix traded sideways for most of the year until the last quarter.

By 2010 Global Markets Could Be In A Recovery Phase

Of course, we should mull over on whether the external environment would be supportive of such HONEYMOON. On whether the banking crisis in the US would have been on a mend or if it could still be undergoing adjustment pangs as shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7: PIMCO Emerging Markets: Average Crisis Durations

According to Michael Gomez, Executive Vice President of leading global investment management company PIMCO in a recent article, ``Unfortunately for the U.S., the fallout is usually both lengthy and costly: historical evidence suggests that banking crises in developed countries take, on average, between four and five years to resolve. As Yogi so famously said, “It ain’t over ‘til it’s over.””

If we are to base the present crisis from the inflection point of the US real estate sector, then the reckoning period for the advent of the crisis could be pegged at February of 2007, see Figure 8.

Figure 8: stockcharts.com: US Real Estate Led Crisis

The NYSE Real Estate index (main window) turned nearly a quarter before the Dow Jones Financials (top minor pane), Banking Index (mid minor pane) and the Mortgage Finance Index (lowest pane).

So if it should take the average crisis in the US to be settled in a timeframe of four to five years, then 2010 would already mark the late phase of the crisis which could translate to a bottoming or consolidation of the US equity markets. At best, it could also start to exhibit some signs of recovery!

Another, if it takes 3.7 years for all countries to resolve the present crisis and 3.3 years for emerging markets based on the PIMCO studies of banking crisis, then it also means that most of the world economies would also be on the process of a recovery by 2010!

This posits for a possibility of strong kick during the presidential honeymoon phase, which also means that 2009 could translate to a springboard for a powerful presidential honeymoon cycle momentum in 2010.

Overall, the prospects of a recovery in the Phisix looks likely a sooner than a later proposition.

Crash and Meltdown Alerts

However, as a word of caution these three months are likely to reflect the most vulnerable months of global equity markets. Some institutions like the Royal Bank of Scotland and Morgan Stanley have issued crash or meltdown alerts last June.

It is not for us to agree or not with such dire outlooks. We have spilled so much ink on these horror stories. While I don’t share the outlook, it can happen. The important thing is to observe HOW OUR PHISIX WILL REACT if these events do occur and not to run to the hills to seek refuge.

At the interim, if the PRESENT DIVERGENCES in the Phisix-US/global markets CONTINUE TO MAKE A SIGNIFICANT HEADWAY even amidst the prospects of a “perfect storm” then investors could possibly start to price in with confidence the belief that we could depart from the rest of the global markets affected by the debt bubble bust stigma.

The best is to see the Phisix consolidate with an upside bias on a gradual scale regardless of what happens elsewhere. A sharp upside climb risk a volatile and deep decline that could wipe out all gains accrued. A good example would be President Estrada’s honeymoon.

Thus, we should see a meaningful yearend rally to mark the transition from the bottom towards a recovery probably from mid October thereafter-assuming no major crashes to impact us. Then 2009 should see a marked improvement from 2008.

On the worst outlook, a global crash could possibly bring our call for this bottom phase to a test.

Global Recession watch: Japan and Euroland Economic Growth Turns Negative!

Japan suffers from slowing exports and rising consumer prices.

Courtesy of Danske Bank

From the Economist, ``According to data released by the government's Cabinet Office on August 13th, seasonally adjusted real GDP contracted by 0.6% quarter on quarter in the three months to June. As the new data also revise down first-quarter growth, from 1% to 0.8%, the economy's performance in the second quarter looks especially weak. In annualised terms, GDP contracted by 2.4% in the quarter to June. Japanese national-accounts data are revised frequently, so the picture may change as further data releases come out later in the year…

``This reflects the increasing impact on Japan of the various headwinds from the global economy—including weakening demand in export markets, high oil and food prices, and the continuing fallout from the US sub-prime crisis…

And it is the same for the Eurozone…

Courtesy of the Economist

From the Economist, ``Europe is struggling to stay above water. Figures released on Thursday August 14th showed that the euro-area economy shrank at an annualised rate of 0.8% in the second quarter, the first such reverse since 2001. Nor are things likely to improve soon. A closely watched survey of purchasing managers in manufacturing and services slumped in July to its lowest level since 2001. Business confidence has turned down sharply in all of the three biggest economies in the euro area: Germany, France and Italy…

``The economy’s downward lurch puts the ECB in an awkward spot. It raised its main interest rate to 4.25% on July 3rd to show that it was serious about controlling inflation, which is well above its target ceiling of 2%. The rate-setters’ fear was that inflation would persist if firms and households used today’s rate as a benchmark for future wages and prices. They are right to worry. In Italy and Spain, wage growth is picking up even as unemployment rises, because of contract clauses allowing workers to be compensated for higher-than-expected inflation.”

Courtesy of stockcharts.com

With the Europe’s Stoxx 50 and Japan’s Nikkei down 27% and 28% as of August 15th, the markets may have already factored in or reflected the GIST of these downside adjustments, in my view.

In the context of Japan’s Nikkei, this observation of Darrel Whitten of Japaninvestors.com should articulate today’s development (highlight mine),

``Excluding the current recession, the 12 prior cycles included recessions that lasted an average of 13~14 months. This implies that Japan’s recession could linger into 2010. Moreover, as the Nikkei 225 has bottomed on average some seven months ahead of these recessions, a bottom in the Nikkei 225 probably won’t be confirmed until Q2 of 2009 or later.

``The good news however is that the Nikkei 225 has already discounted the bulk of the unfolding recession, as it already fell some 29% from a February 2007 high, and is now only about 6% away from what has historically been a post-recession trough (i.e., a 30% peak-to-trough correction). Of course, the previous three pre-recession bear markets involved peak-to-trough corrections of 40%~50%, but this was within the context of the Heisei secular deflation bear market, which we do not believe applies in this case.”

…unless of course, if the deflation conditions in the US and parts of the Europe gorges on the world economy and markets, a scenario we don’t think is likely.

Cartoon of the Day: How Effective is NATO's Hotline?

Courtesy of the Economist's Kal...

House Sold in the US for $1 or P45 Pesos ONLY!

You want to see how dire it is in the US?

Detroit News says a house in an impoverished area was sold for only $1 or about 45 Pesos! (Squatter rights here, as I previously know of, costs nearly 500-1000x more!)

Not only that the house took 19 NINETEEN days in the market for it to find a buyer, and worst, the seller a bank has had to throw in $10,000 just to get the home sold (commission, bonus and fees)!

This from the Detroit News (highlight mine), ``So desperate was the bank owner of 8111 Traverse Street to unload the property that it agreed to pay $2,500 in sales commission and another $1,000 bonus for closing the $1 sale; the bank also will pay $500 of the buyer's closing costs. Throw in back taxes and a water bill, and unloading the house will cost the bank about $10,000.”

Amazing!

“This house at 8111 Traverse in Detroit has been stripped of its siding, plumbing, copper wiring, hot water tank and furnace. Desperate to sell, the bank that owns it has put it up for sale for $1. (Bearing Group)”-Detroit News

Again from Detroit news, ``The sale price of the home may be an anomaly, but illustrates both the depths of the foreclosure crisis in Detroit and the rapid scuttling of vacant homes in some of the city's impoverished neighborhoods.”

This only goes to show how desperate it is in many parts of the US-of course this example could be representative of the extremes.

But in the currency markets, the floated story is different--the Philippine Peso is said to be weighed by US led global slowdown.

Oh really? Maybe our “poor” is now “wealthier” than the poor over there? At least they are not drowning in debt to reach such state of desperation.

And for a little hyperbole...maybe too they can afford better to buy houses over there?

A Government Cardinal Sin That Results To A Bear Market? War!

What is one of the government prompted cardinal sins that results to a bear market? The answer is War! We have dealt with this in our past article, Phisix: Learning From the Lessons of Financial History.

So now it appears we have a LIVE unfolding showcase: Russian assets have been collapsing since the military conflict with Georgia erupted!

Courtesy of Danske Bank

From Lars Christensen and Lars Rasmussen of Danske Bank (highlight mine),

``Russia’s financial markets remain under pressure today following the news. Performance has been negative in FX, fixed income and equity markets, and among derivatives. The Russian rouble (RUB) at one point weakened more than 1.3% against its dual currency basket (45% EUR and 55% USD) to trade around 30.10. The Russian central bank (CBR) has since stepped in to support the currency. The RUB basket currently ranges between 29.70-29.90, a few percentage points weaker than last week.

``Meanwhile, Russian share indexes have hit their lowest levels for almost two years. Russia's benchmark RTS stock index fell more than 4% this morning, to its lowest level since November 2006, although it has rebounded somewhat in the last couple of hours. Overall, Russian equities are down more than 30% from their peak in mid-May.

``Going forward, the Russian markets will remain under pressure for as long as there is no move towards a resolution of the conflict. In addition, further falls in oil prices could add to the downward pressure on Russian assets. Caution is thus clearly warranted in the Russian financial markets.”

Additional observation…

From the New York Times,

``Mr. Saakashivili, the Georgian president, said Russia’s oil riches and desire to assert economic leverage over Europe and the West had emboldened Kremlin country to attack. Georgia is a transit country for oil and natural gas exports from the former Soviet Union that threatens Russia’s near monopoly.

“They need control of energy routes,” Mr. Saakashvili said. “They need sea ports. They need transportation infrastructure. And primarily, they want to get rid of us. ”

Hmmmm. It seems to sound more like a conflict premised on commodity geopolitics!

Global Economic Slowdown And Central Bank Interventions PUMP UP The US Dollar!

``Economists, when faced with a conflict between theory and evidence, discard the theory. Stockbrokers discard the evidence.”-Andrew Smithers and Stephen Wright, authors of "Valuing Wall Street"

In one of our back issues (see Global Markets: The End Of The World? Or Overestimating Global Consequences?) we discussed how falling oil and commodity prices reflect the weakening of global economic growth as well as how contracting US current account deficits imply the tightening of liquidity in the global financial marketplace which tends to bolster the US dollar and elevate general risk levels.

Moreover, we also discussed of the rotating absorption points of the global inflationary background (see Relative Economic Growth, Lack of Access to Capital and Global Depression) where we said,

``But since the advent of the global credit crunch, much of the real estate financed securities have been deflating, thus, the inflation absorption has shifted towards hard assets. Hence, the accentuated surges in food, energy and commodity prices (which is why it gets political mileage). Now that commodity and oil prices are in a respite, our suspicion is that some asset classes are likely to takeover or benefit from these relative price adjustments or the rotating inflation.

``Remember, these processes won’t come to a halt, especially under political imperatives to save the system or the poor or the society or the economy. There will always be some justifications (cloaked by technical jargons-or ‘intelligent nonsense’ as Black Swan savant Mr. Nassim Taleb would say) for such politically based actions.

``Overall, if the popularly held inflation menace will be less of a threat to the global economy, aside from global markets having priced in MOST of the decline in economic growth aspects as reflected in the financial markets (markets indeed serve as great discounting mechanism) then it is likely that we should see the rotation of this inflationary assimilation into new conduits; let me guess-Asia.”

Well the subject of our analysis has been revealed in the markets see figure 1…

Figure 1: stockcharts.com: US Dollar Soars!

The US dollar index skyrocketed last week to record one of the biggest gains in years over the currencies of its major trade partners!

As a reminder we are dealing here with the US dollar index (+3.3%) in relative terms of the Euro (-3.43%), Japanese Yen (-2.26%), Canadian Loonie (-3.65%), the British Pound (-2.74%), Swedish Krona (-2.69%) and the Swiss Franc (-2.91%), and NOT of the Philippine Peso. Note that a weekly 2-3% move in the currency markets, especially applied to a broad universe of relative currencies are rare or signifying “fat tail” high sigma events, and can be particularly devastating, since future currency markets are largely based leveraged contracts.

But overall, the gain of the US dollar had been broad based and equally reflected in Asia but at a much subdued clip. It has even reversed the huge advances made by the Philippine Peso earlier in the week which ended the week at a loss (down .26%).

This fantastic run by the US dollar also seem to coincide with the outbreak of war in Georgia.

Some claim that this is about the turning point in the interest rate cycle. This means that the deteriorating economic conditions apparently ricocheting across the globe will compel global central banks to cut rates thereby reducing the yield premium seen in many of the world currencies relative to the US dollar.

Doomsters, on the other hand, interpret this as signifying the world segueing into a “deep” recession, where emerging markets will likely account for the proverbial “last shoe to drop”.

However, James Turk of goldmoney.com says this is all about central banks in a coordinated effort to prop the flagging US dollar, ``So central banks were accumulating dollars over the past three weeks at a rate far above what one would expect as a result of the US trade deficit. The logical conclusion is that they were intervening in currency markets. They were buying dollars for the purpose of propping it up, to keep the dollar from falling off the edge of the cliff.”

Meanwhile, Brad Setser of the Council of Foreign Relations calls it the “quiet bailout” which can be deduced from the strong surge in the Fed’s custodial holdings (New York Fed holds in behalf of foreign banks). Writes Mr. Setser (highlight mine),

``Right now there are only three countries adding to their reserves at a rate than could explain this kind of growth: China, Russia and Saudi Arabia. Of course, a large country that isn’t adding to its reserves is shifting funds over to the New York Fed — but the rapid increase in the Fed’s custodial holdings suggest at least one of the countries now adding to the foreign assets at a rapid clip is making heavy use of the New York Fed’s custodial accounts.”

``And it is striking that all the increase went into Treasuries.”

So in a sense, yes we agree that decelerating fundamental conditions spreading over to the world have had a considerable contribution to the recent outstanding performance of the US dollar, although what could be seen as different is in the interpretation of “doom” relative to the perspective of a “bailout”. The former means a destined condemnation, while latter means somebody is being saved or rescued by someone which in effect doesn’t translate to a disaster for both parties.

Nonetheless, the remarkable ascent of the US dollar (candlestick chart in the main window) came at the expense of oil (pane below main window) and commodity (CRB index-lowest pane) prices but in the face of a vertiginous rollercoaster ride in the US equity markets (represented by the S&P 500-line chart) which appears to have broken out of the consolidation phase and had practically outperformed most of the MAJOR global benchmarks.

One notable feature in the chart is that the inflection points of Oil, the US dollar index and the S&P appears to be in simultaneous fashion, but in inversely correlated. The US dollar-Oil correlation seems more accentuated.

Of course, there is a great distinction between a market operating under “bailout” conditions and that which is ascertained by unalloyed market forces. A market distorted by government interventions basically reflects artificial price signals whose eventual outcome (success or failure) would be revealed once the applied stimulus fades.

So yes, given the technical picture and the yield arbitrage, the US dollar may likely see a sustained rally over the interim against its major trading partners but this should signify a cyclical rebound (similar to 2005) within a secular bear market instead of a major reversal.

However, we don’t see how the same principle should apply to the Philippine Peso which should recover from the bogeys of falling food and fuel prices as discussed in Tale of The Tape: The Philippine Peso Versus The US Dollar and Philippine Economy: The Micro Impact of Inflation, Bullish on the Peso.

Decoupling Recoupling Debate As A Religion

``The highest intellects, like the tops of mountains, are the first to catch and to reflect the dawn.” - Thomas Babington Macaulay (1800-1859), British Poet, historian and Whig politician

If we accept the US-OECD-Asia-Emerging Market sequencing of the global slowdown as proposed by the doomsayers, then by the chain of logic, the US should recover first as the slowdown spreads to the world.

But this is unlikely to be the case since, aside from a busted financial-real estate sector, NET exports have been a key factor to the apparent resilience of the US economy. This implies that a slowing world economy would further account for a drag to the US which is likely NOT to assume the leadership in the coming recovery.

This is where we part from the doomsayers whom have made the decoupling-recoupling debate as a religion or as some form of abstractionism similar to “If you are not with me then you are against me.” Such rigidity makes us unconvinced.

Merrill Lynch’s Richard Bernstein (HT: Craig McCarty) notes that “only 32% of the world’s equity markets are outperforming the S&P 500 so far this year (in local currency). With that performance backdrop, an appreciating dollar could attract “momentum” capital to the US.”

In such a case where then is the recoupling? With 1/3 of the equity markets outperforming the US, how can we say the world financial markets will suffer a meltdown from a deep recession unless we factor in the OECD economies as representative of the whole?

Think of it another way, if oil and food prices will remain depressed over the interim wouldn’t we be seeing some reprieve to the headline inflation pressures of non-commodity export emerging market economies from which they may be allowed room for a recovery and possibly see a reacceleration of economic growth?

Besides, if Mr. Bernstein is right and a strong dollar could push up the US markets based on momentum or M&A (which is in my view signs of rotating inflation), will not the other tightly correlated benchmarks with that of the US also reflect a similar fate?

Commodity Prices Reflect Fundamentals Aside From Monetary Factors

Another, we find it puzzling how the logic of “commodities-will-decouple-but-emerging markets-won’t” will prevail. The cornerstone of such theme is US dollar-paper money oriented.

True, we agree that the US dollar has been an important variable in shaping oil or commodities prices. But again, the world doesn’t seem to operate in simple cause and effect clauses, see figure 2.

Figure 2: CFTC.com: Oil prices Also Reflect Fundamentals

Recently soaring oil prices got the goat of some US public officials who attributed this phenomenon to “speculative” forces. Since the politicians always react on popular issues, they threatened to slap restrictions on the capital markets in order to curb so-called “speculative forces”. Thus, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) came up with an investigative report to validate or debunk such suspicions.

From the CFTC report, ``The key driver of oil demand has been robust global economic growth, particularly in emerging market economies….world gross domestic product (GDP) growth (with countries weighted by oil consumption shares) has averaged close to 5 percent per year since 2004, marking the strongest performance in two decades.”

In other words, the price dynamics reflected the imbalances derived from variance in the pace of world economic growth against global oil production output more from than speculative activities. Oil production simply couldn’t keep up with global economic growth especially from emerging economies.

In the recent downturn in oil and commodity prices we see the same phenomenon at work, see figure 3 from BCA Research.

Figure 3: BCA Research: U.S. Manufacturing: Global Weakness Adds To Domestic Drag

This from BCA Research, the reputable independent research outfit (highlight mine), ``Global leading economic indicators have rolled over, implying that slower overseas growth will diminish one of the key sources of support for U.S. manufacturers. The July ISM manufacturing survey reported a drop in export orders (albeit the index is still well above its boom/bust line). A slowdown in exports is worrisome because this sector had been the primary source of growth for manufacturers in the past year, as the domestic economy is mired in recession. The only silver lining is that energy prices have finally begun to recede. Although oil prices will have to move substantially lower before having a significant economic impact, energy price relief will help to ease pressure on profit margins and lower inflation expectations. Bottom line: The overall manufacturing sector will continue to grow at a sub-par pace, and the risks will stay on the downside until the consumer retrenchment is further advanced and/or much more relief from commodity prices arrives.”

BCA’s view buttresses our position on the slowing economic world growth and the sensitivity of the US economy to the global conditions.

So as we mentioned above, the US-OECD-Asia-Emerging Market sequencing on the recent economic downshift could be the case today, but from a recovery perspective the market leadership will unlikely come from the same order.

The Acceleration Phenomenon: A Key Emerging Market Dynamic

Now take a look at this commentary from Bloomberg (highlight mine),

``In the past, when the U.S. economy weakened, the rest of the world usually followed quickly, and inflation eased as demand for oil and other commodities fell. U.S. recessions in 1990-1991 and 2001 brought global growth down by half, sending fuel prices tumbling.

``That didn't happen this time. The world expansion barely slowed last year and oil prices surged, even as the U.S. economy shrank in the fourth quarter. Only now -- two years after the U.S. housing boom went bust -- is the slowdown spreading worldwide and the price of oil showing signs of receding.”

And such outlook seems to square or match with the idea the world has been significantly less correlated with the US in the downside and possibly in the upside too.

This very important observation from Mohamed El-Erian, author of When Markets Collide: Investment Strategies for the Age of Global Economic Change and co-CEO of bond-investing giant Pimco (emphasis mine),

``In the old days, if the US economy contracted, the rest of the world would do even worse. But today, if the US contracts, the rest of the world might contract by only half. That's a fundamental change. The wealth of the emerging middle class in countries like Brazil, India and China is becoming a force in itself.”

And perhaps the economic principle that underpins such dynamic is called “The Acceleration Phenomenon”, which was developed by Aftalion a French economist as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Gavekal: The Acceleration Phenomenon

Our favorite Mr. Louis-Vincent Gave has a better description of the Acceleration Phenomenon (highlight mine),

``In China, like in most nations, income is distributed according to a Gaussian pattern (a bell-shaped curve) with a large percentage of the population having an income close to the “average” income. Very few people have a very low income and very few have a very high income.

``If, in China, the purchasing parity adjusted average income in 1998 was US$2,000/year, then the number of people earning more than US$10,000 was have been quite small. But if, by 2003, the average income had risen to US$3,000 per person, then the number of people earning more than US$10,000 will have probably increased by a lot more than 50%.

The above chart shows a hypothetical case. If a country’s average per capita is $10,000 where the elite class (having over $15,000 per annum) comprises 2.28% of the population, an average income growth of 25% will push those in the higher echelon from 2.28% to 15.87% of the population!

The significance, again from the eloquent Mr. Gave,

`` Because we know that when it comes to the buying of certain goods and services, the historical evidence seems to suggest the existence of ‘’thresholds’’.

``For example, if the average income in a country is below US$1,000, nobody owns a television; when the income moves above US$1,000, then almost everybody buys one. For the automobile industry, the critical level seems to be US$10,000/year. For university education US$20,000, etc… Today, as China’s income distribution curve moves towards the right, a number of threshold points are passed by an increasing number of people. A quick example: from nowhere a decade ago, China now counts 210,000 US$ millionaires. The acceleration phenomenon helps explain why car sales rose 64% in 2003. China’s consumption boom has only just started.”

While indeed international channels through trade, capital flows, labor and financial linkages or even monetary pegs could combine to impact an economy, especially in today’s more globalized settings, they don’t constitute everything.

Other significant variables as political, monetary and economic framework similarly determines the internal savings and investing patterns of a country and can present itself as the defining difference to a boom or gloom. As in China’s case a slowdown may reduce the pace of the acceleration phenomenon but generally, the consumption boom derived from such dynamic can lead to a self reinforcing process.

Thus, it is possible that the prospective recovery could even come from a MIRROR progression of the proposed US-OECD-Asia-Emerging Market ranking. Likewise, monetary aspects cannot totally be distinct from economic fundamentals.

Overall, recoupling and decoupling debate should not be seen from an absolutist stand. There will be no perfect decoupling as much as there won’t be perfect recoupling.

The Pleasure of Partial Vindication, Personal Tips

``Reading is a means of thinking with another person’s mind; it forces you to stretch your own.” - Charles Scribner Jr.

It feels soooo good to be vindicated, even if it is just a partial vindication, especially coming from an onslaught of skepticism. Partial because I can be temporarily right today but risks from an adversarial outcome especially from a shock may overwhelm us again. But so far, so good.

Yes, the most difficult part from a contrarian perspective is to be unpopular. Since our insights deal with independent systemic based analysis than from outright simplification of the causality variables as espoused by almost a majority in our field, our ideas tend to be ignored. People like to be told stories that are easy to comprehend or easy to visualize or tales that attached to present prominent events or if we quote Bill Bonner of the Agora Publishing fame, ``People come to believe what they must believe when they must believe it.”

Since we don’t sell anything to anybody, my goal has always been to be as objective as possible, even if it comes at a cost of non-patronage. Sometimes in soliciting our advice, some may have probably felt offended when we dealt them the glacial realities from the functionalities of marketplace, but overtime I hope they come to realize that what we told was for their own good. Sorry it is not my role to confirm your biases.

As a student of the market we try to learn from the deeds of those whom have succeeded in the field and so attempted to assimilate the same traits tailored in accordance to one’s personality.

And as an example of such traits, we learned that independent thinking is crucial to long term investment success, so in adherence to Mr. Warren Buffett’s words of wisdom, ``You can't do well in investments unless you think independently. And the truth is, you're neither right nor wrong because people agree with you. You're right because your facts and your reasoning are right. In the end, that's all that counts. And there wasn't any question about the facts or reasoning being correct.”

Nevertheless, we don’t pretend to know everything, nor do we pretend to pinpoint the exactitudes of peaks and troughs of markets. In the years of learning, it has been a painful realization that trying to engage in market timing is almost like playing a game of vanity. Yes, at times, it comes with accompanying thrills alright; insider treats, forum whispers, support-resistance trade and gossip mongering does add up to the adrenalin. And when the tide turns in our favor we feel infallible or overconfident, never realizing that the rising tide allowed us to benefit than from what we assumed as our inherent “skills”.

But once the tide has turned against us, the pain of losses is almost always greater than the short term successes. We tend to get consumed by regrets, and worst, pass the blame on others instead of admitting and learning from our mistakes.

Besides, in contrast to the simplistic notion that financial market investments is a no-risk, no-failure model is likewise delusional. Some people think that success in the marketplace requires a magic wand. Some people think that the function of analyst is to be a soothsayer or astrologer. This is a no-no or a disconnect from reality.

Exposure in the capital markets always entail risk taking. The truth is we can’t grow trees from the sky. Maybe if you are in the government, but not in the markets. Since we can’t exactly predict tomorrow, we will have to learn how to face the hard facts and correspondingly deal with the risks with appropriate action when conditions so require.

Thus, from the understanding of the cyclicality of the markets we can use our best guessestimates on the whereabouts of the phases of the cycle. Since we lack the market sophistication tools for hedging, from here we can work with what we have by balancing our portfolio in accordance to the risk environment and to one’s risk profile. In short, we get ourselves exposed to the market in the degree where we can have a good night sleep regardless of the daily fluctuations.

Remember, we can’t get married to the market too. We will have to understand that market returns always reflect a tradeoff between risk and returns. The mainstream or my counterparts rarely touches on these aspects. That’s why horse racing sells, you are trained to look at gains and ignore losses. In other words, we learned that investment success has the golden rule-to know your risk. So before putting money in the any endeavor always know how much risk you can afford to take and position accordingly.

We will have to always keep ourselves open to the diversity in opinion or perspectives since it is one way to extract or collapse built in complacencies or biases. Since the market is a channel of exchange thus it is always about diversity-that’s how transactions get consummated. Buyers need sellers in as much as sellers need buyers. That’s the beauty of the market, satisfaction is usually attained by virtue of exchanges.

Finally, understanding the thought process is also another very important factor for us. That is why it has been an obsession for us to study the behavioral framework in terms of finance or economics. From Bernard Baruch (1870-1965), Financer, Speculator Statesman and Presidential Adviser, ``“Only as you do know yourself can your brain serve you as a sharp and efficient tool. Know your own failings, passions and prejudices so you can separate them from what you see.”

Phisix: Understanding Benchmarks; Tidal Flows and Ebbs

``I don't set trends. I just find out what they are and exploit them." - Dick Clark, American Entertainer

Recently we were asked why we chose 2,650 as our threshold benchmark for a transition to a bottom cycle than 2,600.

Figure 5: stockcharts.com: Phisix Does This Like A Recoupling?

Our reply is that trend lines can be deceptive. Look at figure 5, the green line (1) was the original downtrend line, when the Phisix made a first attempt to bottom out in May- unsuccessfully (red circle). Thus the high from that failed breakout becomes our beacon or our lamppost to suggest of the transitioning from the current phase (bottom) to the next phase (advance). That benchmark is about 2,900.

The next blue line (2) signifies the second downtrend line at 2,600, which we thought acted as a minor resistance with the most recent high at 2,650 (blue horizontal line) or a margin of 50 points as enough cushion for false breakouts.

Well the Phisix performed exceptionally well this week. Our benchmarks were significantly overrun. All downside jolts from the US markets have been met with a shrug or insouciance. However the upside was treated with even more dazzling sprints. Plainly said, the Phisix disregarded significant downside moves in the US markets but outclassed them when they moved up. Our Phisix hasn’t behaved like any of the recoupling rubric as proclaimed by the macro looking market and economic Jeremiahs. Not yet anyway.

In fact, the Phisix appeared to have acted out the script we presented last week in Phisix: Knocking At The Exit Gates of the Bear Market!...to a tee!

Moreover, the Phisix strongly outperformed the US market up 4.2% backed by strong broad market activities. Considering that the US closed significantly higher last Friday, we are likely to see a strong opening on Monday.

True, foreigners remain net sellers but they have been reduced to a significant minority (44% week on week) as local money has now dominated the upside action. If the forcible liquidation coming from abroad has diminished thus it is understandable for the locals to take on the destiny of Phisix on their own hands. It is HOME BIAS working at its finest (for the year and since October of 2007) so far.

In short, compared to May, today’s rally seem have stronger legs which should imply what we have been looking for- a transition cycle.

For the bottom phase, we expect one of the two scenarios: one a consolidation or base formation, or two, gradual ascension. If the Phisix should move abruptly higher we might see a sizeable retracement but the recent lows or the former resistance now support should hold, if we are correct about the market in a bottom cycle. And in a bottom the appropriate action would be to accumulate on issues to position for a recovery.

By the way we shouldn’t expect so much for this cycle. The Phisix is still faced with severe external risks, and could be weighed by storms from shocks. Nonetheless, a bottom suggests of a base in spite of the tempest. Anyway, our idea is that if some markets in Asia can pick up in as much as the Phisix then a potential recovery is in sight.

Some have asked me on what issues to buy.

Allow me to quote my favorite from Edwin Lefevre from the classic book Reminiscences of a Stock Operator, ``I never hesitate to tell a man that I am bullish or bearish. But I do not tell people to buy or sell any particular stock. In a bear market all stocks go down and in a bull market they go up...I speak in a general sense. But the average man doesn’t wish to be told that it is a bull or bear market. What he desires is to be told specifically which particular stock to buy or sell. He wants to get something for nothing. He does not wish to work. He does not even wish to have to think. It is too much bother to have to count the money that he picks up from the ground.”

Proof? Look at Figure 6.

Figure 6: PSE: Sectoral Indices In Synchronized Actions

According to Mr. Edwin Lefevre (a.k.a. Jesse Livermore) “In a bear market all stocks go down and in a bull market they go up...” All industry indices have performed almost in sync-bank-blue, services-gold, mining-black candle, commercial-maroon, property-red, and holding green-from bullmarket to bear market to the recent turnaround.

Of course one may argue that one industry could outperform the other. That is true. But generally speaking, they flow or ebb like a tide on the beach.

The last bear market saw almost all stocks fell beyond the 20% threshold bear market levels, except for a few which we identified in Phisix: Learning From the Lessons of Financial History.

If we are right about the Phisix’s new cycle, then the next cycle should see the same characteristics.

Wall Street Journal: Professor Johnson’s Medal Standing Prediction; Philippine Olympic Delegates of ONLY 15 Aspirants Reduces Odds For Gold!

The Wall Street Journal recently published the predictions of economist Daniel Johnson, a professor at Colorado College, on the possible totem pole rankings of medals among the participating countries in the Olympics. Professor Johnson was said to have accurately the outcomes during the past Olympic games (summer and winter) since 2000.

As for the basis of Professor Johnson’s model?

From WSJ, ``five basic pieces of data for each participating nation: GDP per capita, total population, political structure (democratic, authoritarian, military or communist), climate (the number of frost days) and home-nation bias.”

In short, economics, politics and environment were mainly used as gauges to predict outcome.

His prediction for the Beijing games?

Courtesy of Wall Street Journal

What significance from this exercise?

According to Professor Johnson as quoted by WSJ, ``what matters most isn’t comparing the take-home medal count of one nation compared to another but instead measuring it against the nation’s own expected performance, based on his metrics. “This is more of a benchmarking analysis than anything else,” he said, to gauge which nations are over- or under-performing their expected totals. Plus, the overall tally is obviously influenced by the size of each nation and how many athletes they train and send to the games. “One reason Botswana doesn’t win a lot of medals is they don’t send a lot of participants each year,” he said.” (highlight mine)

This blog has predicted that socioeconomic conditions seem ripe for the harvest of the ever elusive first Olympic dream gold medal especially in the realm of boxing as discussed in The Socionomics of the First Philippine Olympic Gold Medal-Thank You Manny Pacquiao.

Unfortunately, we learned that with only ONE boxing representative, Harry Tañamor, the odds for attaining such monumental goal vastly dims-(just learned that the others had lost in the prequalifying rounds prior to the Olympics).

Why?

Aside from economics and the sports itself, the quest for the Olympic gold is also about statistical probabilities as qualified by Professor Johnson.

In short, to INCREASE the odds of realizing such dream we need MORE qualified delegates to represent us. The more the entries, the bigger the chances.

Anyway, good luck to our athletes. We will need alot of them.

Gender Barrier Coming Down In The Olympics: A Reflection of World Socioeconomic Progress?

Evolving important social and economic global trends can be seen in the Olympics-female participation in the games have been getting broader.

From the Economist,

``AT THE beginning of the modern Olympic era in 1896, sport was a male preserve. In the first games there were no women among the 241 competitors. Women got their first shot at summer Olympic glory four years later, when tennis, golf and croquet were deemed suitable pursuits. But as it became more acceptable for women to compete in strength- and speed-based sports, the proportion of female athletes at the Olympics has risen. This year's games in Beijing has more female competitors than ever before, making up 45% of the 10,700 expected participants."

Courtesy of the Economist

Seen from the angle of Olympic delegations, participating nations sending all male teams have likewise been on a decline trend…

Courtesy of gulfinstitute.org

This has been especially evident in some Muslim countries which in the past has had strict clothing and cultural proscriptions.

The implication, according to the Gulf Institute (highlight ours),

``Removing the obstacles for women’s participation in athletic competition and sports in general creates a more inclusive and progressive society that ensures equal rights for all its citizens. It comes as no surprise that countries that do not allow women to compete internationally, whether in such events as the Olympics, FIFA, or the Asian Games, are likely to practice other violations of women’s rights and restrict women’s participation in public life in other ways. Nawal El-Moutawakel, the Moroccan Olympic champion in 400 m race, has put it best in an interview with the Swiss Academy for Development,

“Women’s participation in sport is a reflection of the position of women in society in general. The entrance of women into these sporting spaces often coincides with women's entrance and active participation in civil society and politics.” Therefore, the international community and civil society organizations must join their efforts to bring about a more open and fair social environment by ensuring that women everywhere have access to developing and expressing their athletic potential.”

In short, the lowering of gender barrier possibly reflects the potentials of higher productivity and importantly prospective signs of a more diffusive socio-economic progress.