There
is a serious credit contraction underway, I think [Yellen] should
acknowledge that. I think she has to look at the capital base being
wiped off the banks in this downdraft and equities: that's not
supposed to be happening right now. They're supposed to be
bulletproof, and oh, by the way, gold at $1,200 an ounce, what
does that tell you? It tells you that in a flight to quality, in
a safe haven, people have more confidence in gold than in bank
deposits or paper money. I think things have gotten out of
control—Robert Michele, JP Morgan Global
CIO & Head, Global Fixed Income, Currency & Commodities Group
In
this issue
Phisix
6,650: Resurgent Gold, Will Mining Sector Lead in 2016? Negative
Yield Spread Hits 1 Month Bill-10 Year Treasuries!
-Global
Stock Markets Dive as Faith in Central Bankers Fade
-Has
Gold’s Resurgence Been About A Developing
Major Dislocation In The Global Monetary System?
-Deepening
Strains in the Global Banking System, Singapore as Epicenter for
Asian Crisis 2.0?
-Phisix
6,650: Rotation from Mainstream to Mining Stocks, Trend for 2016?
-Gold
Miners Lead the Mining Index
-Divergent
Trends Between Mining and Mainstream Stocks, The Absence of Domestic
Commodity Markets
-Yield
Spread of Philippine 10 Year Bonds and 1 Month Bills Turn Negative,
Yikes!
Phisix
6,650: Resurgent Gold, Will Mining Sector Lead in 2016? Negative
Yield Spread Hits 1 Month Bill-10 Year Treasuries
Global
Stock Markets Dive as Faith in Central Bankers Fade
At
the end of January I noted that markets seem to have lost faith in
central bankers1
If
so, in the next transition from fight to flight, then this would mean
that the ensuing cascade should be sharp and fast as central banks
have effectively lost control!
With
equity markets of developed economies in a freefall last week, the
central-bank-losing-control dynamic appears to be gaining momentum.
Despite
Friday’s massive stock market rallies, equity benchmark of Europe
and the US has closed substantially lower. Friday’s sharp rebound
has largely been imputed to the
colossal 12% bounce by oil prices, which news say had been about
rumors of an OPEC deal or possibly, from liquidations
from inverse oil ETF positions or even from both.
Most
of Europe’s bourses have lost 3% and above. Peripheral
Europe, nations which suffered the debt crisis in 2011-12, bled most.
Equity benchmarks of Greece, Portugal, Spain and Italy dived 9.84%.
7.63%, 6.77% and 4.26% respectively. And it’s not just stocks,
benchmark sovereign bonds of these nations came under pressure (or
bond yields has recently spiked.
The
10 year Greek
yield surged to a 7 month high at 11.516%. The Portugal
equivalent soared to an August 2014 high at 3.734%. Italy’s
yield jumped to a two month high at 1.65% and the Spanish
yield increased to a month’s high at 1.739%. If current trends will
be sustained, then have these been seminal signs that Europe’s debt
crisis returned?
Yet
as of Thursday, February 11, the
grizzly bears have claimed the global equity markets.
It’s
interesting to note that Japan’s
Nikkei 225 hemorrhaged by 11.1% from three days of steep losses
during the holiday truncated week.
Stock
markets of China and Vietnam were closed for the week.
Yet
if Hong Kong’s stock market should serve as precursor to the
China’s performance this coming week, then HSI’s heavy 5.02%
losses this week may reflect on bear market forces reasserting
dominance on mainland China’s bourses. That’s unless the
‘national team’ goes to work early to offset the selling
pressures.
Meanwhile,
one
of the latest Asian bellwether to fall into the domain of the
grizzly bears has been the Australian benchmark, the S&P ASX 200.
The S&P ASX 200
crashed 4.24% this week.
On
the other hand, India’s
Sensex dived 6.62% this week even as the government declared a 3Q
(October-December) GDP of 7.3%.
Apparently,
some
quarters in media have expressed doubt on the methodology of how
the Indian government has arrived with its numbers! This week’s
meltdown has also brought the SENSEX to the bear market!
This
is not to say that actions of central banks will have no effects on
the markets. Rather, present dynamics have shown diminishing returns
in terms of boosting risk assets. Or said differently, central bank
magic has been fading. But it won’t stop them from trying.
Central
bankers have been busy this week. Sweden’s Riksbank sent
their policy rates deeper into the negative zone. In her Senate
testimony, Fed Chair Janet Yellen said that since there
“is always some chance of recession in any year” … the Fed
would consider negative
rates: “ In light of the experience of European countries and
others that have gone to negative rates, we're taking a look at them
again, because we would want to be prepared in the event that we
would need (to increase) accommodation”.
In
addition, the Bank of Japan may call an emergency meeting soon for
them “to
undertake additional monetary easing if financial markets remain
turbulent”.
Additionally,
the European central Bank was
reported to be in talks with the Italian government
for the former to buy “bundles
of bad loans as part of its asset-purchase programme and accepting
them as collateral from banks in return for cash”
It’s
truly amazing how central banks have shown even more expressions of
panic with financial markets apparently ignoring their overtures and
or even actions (such as Sweden’s
Riksbank).
But
sentiments abroad depart from that of the Philippines.
Yet
it has truly been a fascination to observe on how the establishment
perceives of the escalating global financial volatilities as having
little impact on the Philippine economy or the financial markets. For
them, it’s all about the incantation of “domestic demand”. As
if domestic demand have permanently been engraved on the economic
stone. As if domestic demand occurs automatically, just like manna
from heaven. As if prospective losses from exports, tourism, BPOs,
OFWs, foreign investments and portfolio outflows would have little or
NO direct and indirect effects on jobs, incomes, earnings,
investments or consumption.
And
if policies of ZIRP and NIRP have been backfiring on economies and
markets of both developed and emerging markets, then why should the
Philippines, which
embraced the same policies in 2009, be immune to such pathology?
Because
media ‘experts’ and authorities say so? Because the Philippines
is immune to the law of economics? Or has it been because the
Philippines, coming off a clean balance sheet prior to 2009, have
represented the one of the few nations to enter the late stage of the
credit cycle?
The
more the misperception the greater the crash
Has
Gold’s Resurgence Been About A Developing
Major Dislocation In The Global Monetary System?
Last
week’s equity meltdown seem to have punctuated a pivotal change in
market dynamics: from Risk OFF to Flight to Safety
As
stock markets bled ($FAW-FTSE ALL World), gold and government bonds
of some developed economies soared.
This
week, yields of US 10
and 30 year
treasuries fell by 10 bps to 1.748% and by 7 bps to 2.6%
respectively. Shown as prices, the 10 year UST soared (lowest window)
On
the other hand, gold (main window) rocketed by 5.49% over the week.
Gold has surged in 4 consecutive weeks to account for a massive
13.19% in gains. Gold’s surge has been accompanied by a magnificent
10.55% runup of the HUI
gold bugs or an index of 15 major gold miners (middle window).
Gold
(and UST) appears to have ‘bottomed’ when the FED
raised rates in mid-December. Both have spiraled higher when the
Bank of Japan announced the NIRP in late January.
In
September 2015 I made this recommendation2
(bold original)
One
should consider hedging against further market volatility or from
more episodes of meltdowns or from a torturous bear market in stocks.
So here’s my recommendation, for Philippine residents I recommend to stay in cash, especially in US dollar. Use any USD-peso reprieve to buy the US dollar or sell the peso.
One can add gold (and or gold based assets) to such hedges. Gold may be down today (which makes it a value buy), but this may be a different story when the “real thing” arrives.
And by “real thing” I mean that if the current Emerging Market-Asian-ASEAN market selloffs morphs into a financial crisis, then the USD-PHP high in September 27, 2004 at 56.45 can easily be taken out.
And growing risks of confiscation from indirect means (inflationism) or from direct means (war on cash via negative nominal rates, wealth taxes, deposit haircuts) should spur a reversal in gold.
I
followed this up last November with3
So
I expect the USD to serve as a lightning rod against stresses that
would surface in response to massive imbalances as an outgrowth of
central bank policies from all over the world. And once the charade
from risks assets have been sloughed off, gold will scintillate.
So
far gold has been affirming on my recommendations
Gold
as a flight to safety hasn’t been always the case. Gold chart from
goldprice.org
Nominal
USD-Gold prices fell when the dot.com
bubble burst in 2000.
Gold
prices plunged during the emergence of the US mortgage crisis or the
Great Financial Crisis (GFC) in 2007-2008.
Gold’s
secular bullmarket began in 2003. That’s when global stocks
bottomed from the dotcom bubble bust. That’s also after the FED
went into a series of rate cuts from 6.5%
in 2001 to 1.75% in 2003.
Gold
also rallied when the FED
and various central banks launched their massive rescue programs
in the face of the GFC from 2008 onwards.
However,
after 11
consecutive (2001-2011) years of annual gains, gold prices peaked
in August 2011.
Gold’s
climax came a month before the FED
announced QE 2.0 (Operation Twist, September 2011) and 6 months
after Eurozone
finance ministers set up a permanent bailout fund, called the
European Stability Mechanism,
plus the string of bailouts from the embattled PIGS, which signified
the core of the
European Debt Crisis.
In
the meantime, 3 years after the imposition of
gargantuan $586 billion stimulus in November 2008 to shield her
economy from the GFC, China’s
GDP began its descending path in 2011.
Following
gold’s 11 years of successive run ups, cyclically speaking, it
would be natural for gold to take a reprieve. So perhaps gold’s 4
year and 5 months old 41.96% downturn signified a cyclical bear
market under a secular bullmarket. If this is true then a bullmarket
for gold should be in the works.
Yet
even as the central banks of US, Europe and Japan and the rest of
emerging markets deployed life support policies, which in particular,
according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch: 637 rate cuts, $12.3tn of
asset purchases by global central banks in the past 8 years,
$8.3tn of global government debt currently yielding 0% or less and
489 million people currently living in countries with official
negative rates policies (i.e. Japan, Eurozone, Switzerland, Sweden,
Denmark)4,
initially economic performances diverged. Today, economic signals
point to a convergence—increasing risk of a global recession.
So
maybe gold smelled of the impotency of central bank policies. Perhaps
too gold’s bear market instead reflected on the spreading of
deflationary forces regardless of central bank actions.
And
possibly with Japan’s adaption of the Negative Interest Rate Policy
(NIRP), gold may have seen this as a reinforcement of a de facto
global central bank policy trend.
Coupled
with growing ban on cash by governments mostly under NIRP, the
likelihood of imposition of myriad capital controls, prospective
bail-ins or deposit haircuts on troubled banks, and or even perhaps
outright protectionism, probably gold senses a massive disruption in
the banking system, and the large scale drying up of global liquidity
as the public gravitate towards cash with gold functioning as an
alternative medium of exchange.
In
other words, could
gold be sensing a brewing or developing major dislocation in the
monetary system?
Deepening
Strains in the Global Banking System, Singapore as Epicenter for
Asian Crisis 2.0?
And
signs of such escalating strains seem to have already surfaced in the
global banking system.
First,
the tightening of “dollar” liquidity, which has created a
feedback loop with economic slowdown, has been a key reason for
deteriorating bank fundamentals.
The
US dollar has been manifesting such dynamic since 2012.
The
Bloomberg US dollar
index or BBDXY (upper window) has risen by 31.5% from the lows of
2012 through last week. Or said differently, the US dollar has risen
against a broad measure of currencies of her key trading partners.
The
BBDXY’s
distribution share as follows: 34.3% euro, 16.2% yen, 12%
Canadian dollar, 9.9% British pound, 8.5% Mexican peso, 5.5%
Australian Dollar, 4.9% Swiss Franc, 3.6% Korean won, 3% China yuan
and 2.2% Singapore dollar
On
the other hand, the JP
Morgan Bloomberg Asian dollar index or the ADXY has fallen by
11.6% since 2012. The bulk of Asian currency losses to the USD have
emerged from the 2H 2014 through today.
The
ADXY’s
basket consists of the following: China yuan 38.16%, Korean won
12.98%, Singapore dollar 11.07%, Hong Kong dollar 9.22%, India rupee
8.75%, Taiwan dollar 6.1%, Thai baht 4.92%, Malaysian ringgit 4.23%,
Indonesian rupiah 2.85% and the Philippine peso 1.65%.
So
rising BBDXY (USD) since 2012 eventually spilled over to as the
weakening of Asian currencies in 2H 2014.
Second,
has been the recent meltdown of global
banking stocks.
Third,
has been the transmission of credit risk. The crash of commodity
prices has spread to emerging market debt, to high yield bonds and
then to bank exposure on vulnerable industries and economies. In
short, the deterioration in credit conditions has spread to many
industries which leaves banks and other financial institutions
vulnerable given years of massive credit expansion.
Fourth,
has been an upside
spiraling of credit default swaps (CDS) of several major European
banks such as Deutsche bank, Credit Suisse and UBS, which means
default risk has been rising.
Even
additional Tier 1 bank capital in Europe’s banking system has now
come under scrutiny.
From
Bloomberg5:
The
volatility and credit spread gyrations seen in the financial space
over the past 24 hours may be the consequence of more than just
investor unease over Deutsche Bank AG’s ability or otherwise to
meet obligations on its riskiest bonds and other debt service costs,
Bloomberg strategist Simon Ballard writes.
Rather
it probably highlights the extent to which investors have chased
yield down the capital structure over the past couple of years and
are now left exposed to possible re-pricing risk.
From
a regulatory perspective, Contingent Convertible Bonds, known as
CoCos or additional Tier 1 securities, were developed to be a
strategic funding tool -- a regulatory capital buffer to prevent
systemic collapse of important financial institutions. Effectively,
CoCos are designed to fail, without bringing down the bank itself in
the process. The key problem in understanding the true risk embedded
in this asset class, though, might be that it has never been tested.
Deutsche Bank, in feeling compelled to reassure investors and
employees that it has the solvency to meet its coupon obligations on
this riskiest debt may have only exacerbated market uncertainty over,
and price reaction in, these assets.
Investor
concerns remain over what the overall market impact might be if a
bank should see the need to suspend a coupon payment on a CoCo
security. Indeed, such a move could make the latest selloff in credit
risk look like a mere correction.
Fifth
and lastly, a sharp widening of credit spreads in the US
and across
the globe, as well as negative
swap spreads in the US and a sharp flattening
of the yield curve in the US and in other developed economies
which raises the risk of a US-Global recession.
This
has simply been the periphery to the core in motion. And the feedback
mechanism from the underlying deterioration in finance has only been
spreading to infect the center of credit transmission, the banking
system.
Of
course it has been interesting to note of the significant
deterioration in the US retail industry: as enumerated by Fox
business contributor Gary Kaltbaum6:
Wal-Mart
is closing 269 stores, including 154 inside the United States, KMart
is closing dozens of stores, JC Penney shutting down almost 100
stores, Macys shutting 36 stores, The Gap closing 175 stores,
Aeropostale closing 84 stores, Finish Line closing 150 stores,
Sears shutting 100s of stores and Massive sales and earnings
misses by Kohls, Bed Bath and Beyond, Best Buy, Ralph Lauren and many
others.
Not
only will the above imply more DEAD
shopping malls in the US,
these should extrapolate to a wider spectrum of credit risk for the
financial system!
The
above should be another wonderful template to what will happen to
the shopping malls bubble in the Philippines.
Nonetheless,
a popular Swiss investor Felix
Zulauf
who
runs Zulauf Asset Management
predicts that Singapore will be the epicenter
for a banking crisis that will spread to the rest of Asia7
"Singapore,
which has attracted a lot of foreign capital over the years because
of its image as a strong-currency state, will be extremely exposed to
the situation in China," Zulauf told Barron's
Roundtable in January.
"Singapore's
banking-sector loans have grown dramatically in the past five or six
years. Singapore is now losing capital, which means the banking
industry is losing deposits."
He
said this would probably cause carry trades to backfire,
triggering heavy losses for those who had borrowed heavily to
buy higher-yielding assets.
"I
expect a banking crisis to develop in Singapore and to spread
eventually to Hong Kong," he said.
So
with multiple hotspots for a potential crisis and the risk of
prospective confiscation by the government of private funds, it’s
no wonder why British bullion dealers reported last week that
investors had been “going
bananas” over physical gold.
Phisix
6,650: Rotation from Mainstream to Mining Stocks, Trend for 2016?
It’s
been a long time since I wrote about the mining stocks.
Well
what a week of surprise!
What
used to be the most unpopular and ignored sector seem to have stolen
the thunder from mainstream stocks.
For
three successive weeks, superb gains have made the once dejected the
mining sector the recent darling of momentum traders.
The
mining sector soared by an amazing 8.55% this week, 9.19% the other
week and 4% two weeks back to lift the index back to a positive 2.4%
this year.
It’s
the only sector with a positive returns year to date.
The
mining sector (black candle) has parted ways or diverged from
mainstream stocks or the PSEi (blue line). It has missed out on the
record boom in May 2013 and in April 2015.
Since
May 2012 through January 2016 or in a grueling 3 year and 9 months,
the sector’s index has sunk by an agonizing 68.5%. The torturous
saga of the mines reveals what a full blown bear market looked like.
Fantastic
gains of the past 4 weeks have rendered the said benchmark to be
quite overbought.
Regardless
of the coming hiatus, or profit taking sessions, the recent actions
perhaps may provide clues to what may become the dominant dynamic for
the year: will there be a rotation from the mainstream to mining
stocks?
Gold
Miners Lead the Mining Index
Of
course, not all mining stocks are the same.
Based
on the mining index, it appears that the best performers had been
gold mining stocks.
For
the week, Lepanto A and B sizzled by a breathtaking 81.32% and 75.88%
respectively!! Philex Mining took second spot up by a phenomenal
25.98%!! Lepanto subsidiary Manila Mining A and B took third spot by
posting an exceptional weekly advance of 18.18% and 16.67%
correspondingly.
These
3 issues accounted for 30.16% share of the mining index as of last
Friday. The biggest weight, coal miner Semirara, which likewise is a
PSEi composite issue, fell 3.17% this week. Atlas Mining, the third
ranked firm in the index, which includes gold as byproduct, was up
3%.
The
rest of the non-gold mining issues were mixed.
Other
non-index gold mining issues Benguet Consolidated, Apex Mining, Omico
Mining and Alsons Consolidated likewise racked up significant gains,
specifically 35%, 24.73%, 17.53% and 8.73% correspondingly.
Only
United Paragon Mining (UPM) underperformed with a measly 2.67%
advance.
So
the sharp gains in the international prices of gold may have been a
pivotal factor in juicing up the speculative fervor of domestic
participants. As noted above, the HUI gold bugs soared by 10.55% over
the week and have been up 47.13% year to date even as gold has only
been up 16.78%
Perhaps
too, some corporate deals may be at work for Lepanto to have fueled
such stark outperformance.
Question
now is: have recent activities signified just another vicious bear
market rally or the birth pangs of a bull market? The answer entirely
depends on the price of gold.
Divergent
Trends Between Mining and Mainstream Stocks, The Absence of Domestic
Commodity Markets
I
do not believe that domestic participants have pumped gold stocks
because they see this as a bid on safehaven assets.
Instead,
they seem to see this as another opportunity to play the stock market
casino.
Both
mining index (black candle) and Phisix (blue line) has conjointly
dropped in the 4Q and simultaneously rebounded from the massive
January selloff.
But
while the recent rally in the Phisix (blue) seem to have stalled, the
mining index picked up speed to show, possibly and hopefully
incipient, signs of divergence. Nonetheless, as of the last quarter,
the correlation of both indices moving in the same direction seems
greater than the last week’s departure. For now.
Divergence
or rotation can only be affirmed when gold mining stocks will move
independently from the mainstream stocks.
The best evidence will emerge when both will move in opposite
directions. This had been the case from 2012 through 2015 when miners
collapsed while the bubble industries blossomed. It should be a
curiosity to see when both trade places. Time will tell.
Gold
miners for me serve as a proxy or titles to claims on physical gold.
That’s because spot and futures commodity markets have been missing
in a country which sees itself as first world. Yes the Philippines
has been the only ASEAN major without a commodity market.
The
establishment thinks that they can leapfrog over the commodity
backdrop of Philippine economy by blowing property, shopping mall and
casino bubbles financed by massive leveraging or credit expansion.
The
reality
is the commodity (agriculture-mining) industry, even when they
constitute a small segment of statistical GDP, employs
close to a third of labor force. Such translates to mountains of
unlocked savings, investment, demand and consumption.
The
absence of commodity markets simply means that productive growth for
the sector has lagged behind by virtue of insufficient investments
and that the sector remains virtually inefficient as prices have
reflected political obstacles than sheer demand and supply.
The
absence of commodity markets can also be tied to the lack of interest
by the industry to hold savings at the banking sector. That’s
because the industry’s financial knowledge and earning potentials
have been limited to merely growing/mining and selling their output
to politically privileged middle men, rather than through bid and ask
in the commodity markets. When farmers and miners learn to directly
trade and hedge their produce, output or products, such will allow
them to hedge or to reduce their risks and amplify their earnings.
Having to increase their level of trade knowledge plus an increase in
earnings will surely prompt them to enroll in banks and tap capital
markets.
But
the BSP would rather go on a publicity campaign on ‘financial
inclusion’ rather than deal with real issues
And
the reason for the nonexistence of the commodity markets has been
politics: there has been too much vested interest rooted in them. The
existence of commodity markets should mean a substantial reduction,
if not an extirpation, of these politically privileged middle men
protected by byzantine regulations and mandates or agricultural
protectionism.
So
the establishment’s lack of desire to establish commodity markets
should translate to local market participants’ little respect for
precious metals. Never mind if the peso’s origins were from mainly
from a silver
standard and a brief period of a gold standard. History has
little or no importance to people blinded by present orientation
predicated on feel good politics.
Nonetheless,
since international prices of gold will serve as the key determinant
of the fate of gold shares and if locals have been oriented to follow
this correlation, regardless of what they think gold, then domestic
gold stocks should resonate with their international peers.
Other
potential factors that influence share price movements of domestic
gold miners will be the operations side of each miners, as well as,
the politics behind the industry and the locality where these mines
operate. But this will be subsidiary to the international price of
gold.
Yield
Spread of Philippine 10 Year Bonds and 1 Month Bills Turn Negative,
Yikes!
For
the establishment, except for stocks and property prices, all other
prices are considered inferior, irrelevant or beyond their definition
of numbers based ‘economics’
Yet
if international media have raised the issue of flattening of the
yield curve abroad as increasing the risk of recession, in the
Philippines, the yield curve has no significance at all.
Last
week was a milestone in terms of yield spread activities.
As
yields of Philippine treasury bills (1,3 and 6 months) spiked, the 10
year equivalent dropped (upper window). The result? The
first ever inversion of the yield
of the 1
month bill at 3.907% and the 10
year benchmark at 3.826%! Or coupon yields of the 1 month bill has become
higher than the 10 month.
The
spread between the 1 month bill and the 7
year at 3.75% has also turned negative as the 1 month and 5
year yield at 3.938% has massively flattened.
Because
yields of 3 and 6 month bills also spiked, the result has been a
massive flattening of the spread relative to the 10 year benchmark.
And
it has not just been the front face of the curve, negative spreads
have returned to the 10 and 3 year, as well as, the belly of the
yield curve the 10-5 year yields.
Not
signs of signs of severe monetary tightening?
Disclosure:
Writer owns several mining stocks.
____
1
See
Phisix
6,700: Ferocious Bear Market Rally Pump; 4Q and 2015 GDP’s
Cosmetic Numbers January 31, 2016
2
See
Phisix
7,050: The Peso in the Face of Crashing Emerging Market and ASEAN
Currencies, September 6, 2015
3
See
Phisix
7,100: Surprise! ICTSI Chief Enrique Razon Warns: Another Financial
Crisis is COMING!!!! SM Plays with Fire! November 9, 2015
4
Bank
of America Merrill Lynch 637
Rate Cuts And $12.3 Trillion In Global QE Later, World Shocked To
Find "Quantitative Failure" Zero Hedge.com February
12, 2016
5
Bloomberg.com
Deutsche
Bank’s Assurance Exposes Tip of CoCo Iceberg: Analysis
February 10, 2016
6
Gary
Kaltbaum Fox News Business Contributor Our
response to the President’s patting himself on the back on 4.9%
unemployment rate! garykaltbaum.com February 7, 2016
7
Australian
Financial Review Forget
about Europe, investor tips Singapore banking crisis February
10, 2016