Showing posts sorted by relevance for query venezuela. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query venezuela. Sort by date Show all posts

Saturday, February 09, 2013

Venezuela Devalues Currency by a Third; Symptoms of Hyperinflation


First, stock markets hardly represents what public sees as economic “growth” conditions but about the state of monetary disorder. This has been especially pronounced today as political interventions has been intensifying across the globe.

Two, how statistics have been patently incompatible with the real state of economic affairs.

From Bloomberg, (bold mine)
Venezuela devalued its currency for the fifth time in nine years, a move that may undermine support for ailing President Hugo Chavez and his allies ahead of possible elections later this year.

South America’s biggest oil producer may have to call elections if Chavez, who hasn’t been seen for two months after undergoing cancer surgery in Cuba, dies or steps down. He ordered his government to weaken the exchange rate by 32 percent to 6.3 bolivars per dollar starting Feb. 13, Finance Minister Jorge Giordani told reporters yesterday in Caracas.

A spending spree that almost tripled the fiscal deficit last year helped Chavez, 58, win a third six-year term. The devaluation can help narrow the budget deficit by increasing the amount of bolivars the government receives from oil exports. Yet the move also threatens to accelerate annual inflation that reached 22 percent in January.
So the Chavez led Venezuela’s government finally admits to what black markets have been exposing all along: The imminence of shortages of foreign currency (US dollar) and an insatiable and profligate government financed by money printing engineered to buy votes.

Importantly, the above dynamics has been leading to real and not statistical inflation.

Proof? More from the same article: (bold mine)
Annual inflation accelerated to 22.2 percent in January, the fastest pace in eight months, led by a jump in food prices. Prices climbed 3.3 percent in January after rising 3.5 percent in December.

In the unregulated market, the bolivar weakened 6 percent yesterday to 19.53 bolivars per dollar, according to Lechuga Verde, a website that tracks the rate. Venezuelans use the unregulated credit market because the central bank doesn’t supply enough dollars at the official rates to meet demand.
Notice that the estimated price inflation figures has been only 22% (mostly skewed because of price controls and possible manipulations) whereas even considering the recent 32% devaluation, black market rates are way way way distant from the official rates: 19.53 black market versus 6.3 official. Black market rates signify more than twice the official rates.

So black markets are simply saying that real inflation are substantially more than media and official pronouncements. Signs of which are likewise being manifested on the stock market.

image

Venezuela’s IBVC returned 300% in 2012 in nominal domestic currency terms. As of Friday’s close the index has been up 20% year to date (chart from tradingeconomics.com)

image
Venezuela’s IBVC’s parabolic moves reverberates with the Zimbabwe’s Industrial Index in 2007, which I earlier posted here. The Zimbabwe bellwether skyrocketed until the climax of her hyperinflation episode in 2008, where consumer prices doubled everyday!!!.

Despite the hallelujahs from the recent devaluation by mainstream experts, Venezuela seems as exhibiting symptoms of the transition towards hyperinflation.

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Global Equity Markets: Signs of Exhaustion; What US Outperformance Means

Bespoke Invest has an updated table of the year-to-date and the month-to-date performances of global equity markets.

I will only show the year-to-date chart.

clip_image002

The month to date chart you can go directly to Bespoke here

Only 18 out of the 78 countries or 23% of the countries in Bespoke’s tally posted positive returns from April 15 to May 15 2011.

Major economies and the BRIC bourses have all been in the red. But the BRIC has underperformed the G-7.

ASEAN bourses largely outperformed most of the world.

On a year to date basis the picture changes; about half of the global equity markets are still in the black or registered positive gains.

Nevertheless the continuing weakness in the markets as a result of many political events is likely to weigh on the above standings.

Again, y-t-d the G-7 economies have outclassed the BRICs, while ASEAN bourses remain slightly above the mean.

Venezuela's Stagflation

An irony is that Venezuela whom just popped out of the recession leaped 10% in May to grab the 2nd spot.

Venezuela’s recovery could merely be statistical considering that the country, despite being an oil exporter, has now been rationing electricity in the face of rolling brownouts.

Nationalization policies have led to a material drop in foreign investments that has contributed to such social blight.

Venezuela’s inflation at 22.9% has hardly been affecting stock price levels.

I’d say the so-called Venezuelan outperformance is a result of government’s money printing in preparation for 2012 Presidential elections.

Venezuela looks more like the movie The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. Venezuela stagflationary environment has exhibited an interesting phenomenon of a rising stock market amidst a recessionary environment and high unemployment.

As stated before, for me, the Venezuela's Chavez regime seems like a prime candidate for Zimbabwe 2.0.

Implication of the Changes in the Ratio of Emerging Market-US Equity

Yet the outperformance of the US relative to Emerging Markets should be seen from the bigger picture.

clip_image004

Again chart above courtesy of Bespoke.

EM bourses have largely bested US markets at the start of the recovery or since November 2008 until its peak on November 2010 (see red trend line).

Presently such trend seems to have reversed. (see blue line which forms a wedge)

I am not sure if this means that EM would start underperforming over the coming months or if this represents plain consolidation or a pause prior to the next up leg. Although I am inclined to think the latter.

Besides it’s no good news to suggest that the US outperforms the world considering that globalization has been reducing the US share contribution to the global economy. (in 1960 US share is 39%, in 2009 it was 24.23%)

clip_image006

This only implies that perhaps tightening of money conditions could have been taking hold outside the US, and may affect the global economy, which appears to be exhibited by current stock market performances. And this may eventually will get transmitted to the US.

One would further note that the previous market top in 2007-2008 was defined by a consolidation phase between the EM economies and US markets before the Lehman crash in October 2008 (see green oval).

So while home biased US managers see this as good news, this ain’t one for me.

Let me be clear: This isn’t a case to be strongly bearish yet. Although this should serve a yellow flag, which requires more confirmation or falsification.

Monday, November 26, 2012

Inflationary Boom Powers Phisix to Milestone Highs

Inflation is like sin; every government denounces it and every government practices it-Sir Frederick William Leith Ross

The Philippine Phisix hit a new milestone.
clip_image002

We are told that the “upbeat expectations” on listed companies aside from “macroeconomic” dimensions have powered the Phisix to the latest high watermark.

In reality, such comments signify as a descriptive narrative of the current events based on the self-serving or attribution bias[1]—or when people attribute success to dispositional and internal factors or skills and impute failures on external uncontrollable forces or on luck.

Here, rising stocks, in the purview of the mainstream, supposedly accrue from or has been construed as emanating from strong corporate performance and robust economic growth.
Other factors have been omitted.

Yet such comment can also be discerned as symptoms of the bubble psychology through the reflexivity theory which represents a feedback loop mechanism between people’s expectations and their attendant actions in response to the changes in the prices and vice versa as previously explained[2].

Surging equity prices, which lends to the impression of sustainability of the boom, electrifies and energizes public confidence which leads to greater and aggressive risk taking and vice versa. The bullish psychology compounds on the attendant action which accelerates on the momentum or the growing conviction phase. Such cycle occurs until the illusion unravels.

Record Highs: Things Don’t Appear as They Seem: The Venezuelan Experience

The popular wisdom, wherein valuations of stock markets have been seen as having causal relations with corporate performance and macroeconomic conditions, has been nebulous. This has been especially pronounced since the Lehman bankruptcy in 2008.

Venezuela serves as a lucid example
clip_image003

The award for the world’s best performing stock market in 2012 belongs to Venezuela’s Caracas Stock Exchange Stock Market Index.

With nominal gains or returns at an astounding 228% on a year-to-date basis, as of Friday’s close, the Caracas Index has been the clear runaway or unchallenged champion.

Yet, Venezuela’s economic growth as measured by the GDP has hardly been improving. Statistical economic growth has been flagrantly manipulated for political reasons and amplified through widespread price controls which essentially subdued statistical price inflation[3].

In the real world, the price of Venezuela’s currency, the bolivar, has now been trading FOUR times (!!!) the official exchange rate in the black market[4].

The public also expects the imminence of the 5th official devaluation, since Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez imposed currency controls in 2003.

Recent bond sales by Venezuela’s central bank sank to the lowest level in two years[5], which implies that bond investors have either been waiting for the bolivar to devalue or that bond investors have been pressuring the Venezuelan government to allow market prices to reflect real economic conditions.

Worst, economic figures hardly reveals of the diminishing standards of living experienced by Venezuelans through huge shortages experienced by the broader economy, which according to reports, are at record highs[6]. So record stock market comes amidst record shortages of supply of goods.

Also, Venezuela’s US dollar reserves have fallen off the cliff. The petrodollar fund has plummeted 60% from January 2012 and 93% in 2008[7] as foreign exchange continues to get drained. The depletion of foreign currency means that importers, whom have so far has been the key source of supplies of goods for the economy, would run out of resources and that this would compound on the shortage miseries of Venezuelans. 

clip_image005

Also, the growing scarcity of foreign exchange and expanding government deficits means that financing of the Venezuelan government would increasingly depend on central bank monetization. (chart from Tradingeconomics.com)

Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, despite having been re-elected for his fourth term[8], has been conspicuously running the economy aground with his policies based on “socialist revolution”[9].

Yet, Venezuela’s bolivar, bond and stock markets hardly chime with the official economic data.

Venezuela’s financial markets have instead been manifesting symptoms of an escalating monetary disorder from the deeply inflationist, redistributionist and interventionist anti-business regime of Mr. Chavez.

The surge in the Caracas Stock markets, thus, represents a ticking time bomb, whose continuance will lead to the eventual collapse of the bolivar and the Venezuelan economy.

In other words, such dynamics signifies as symptoms of the heightening risk of a full blown hyperinflation.

The Venezuelan episode essentially demolishes populist wisdom. In other words, to see surging stock markets as accounting for favorable “macroeconomic” conditions or to impute “positive investor confidence” would tantamount to a patent misinterpretation and analysis. In reality, Venezuela’s surging equity markets exhibits policy induced pathology which has been ventilated on the financial markets.

The other moral of the story is the showcase of the nasty or ill effects from “democracy” as evinced by the “tyranny of the majority”.

As the second US president John Adams wrote to John Taylor in 1814[10]
I do not say that democracy has been more pernicious on the whole, and in the long run, than monarchy or aristocracy. Democracy has never been and never can be so durable as aristocracy or monarchy; but while it lasts, it is more bloody than either. … Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide. It is in vain to say that democracy is less vain, less proud, less selfish, less ambitious, or less avaricious than aristocracy or monarchy. It is not true, in fact, and nowhere appears in history. Those passions are the same in all men, under all forms of simple government, and when unchecked, produce the same effects of fraud, violence, and cruelty. When clear prospects are opened before vanity, pride, avarice, or ambition, for their easy gratification, it is hard for the most considerate philosophers and the most conscientious moralists to resist the temptation. Individuals have conquered themselves. Nations and large bodies of men, never.
Hugo Chavez seems on the path to validate the admonitions former US president John Adams 
Leaning Against the Wind: The Fatal Conceit

Of course, the Philippines isn’t Venezuela. But the law of economics is universal.

Philippine officials tell us that under a low interest rate environment, they “will not tolerate asset bubble formation and pricing mismatches”[11].

But this represents arrantly an absurd and a self-contradictory claim. Social policies shape people’s incentives. People react to incentives provided by policies.

Artificial suppression of interest rates punishes savers and creditors and moral behavior.

Alternatively, such policies reward rampant speculation, gambling and heightened risk taking or basically immoral activities.

People’s time preferences have subliminally been redirected to short term oriented or high time preferences activities through spending and investment via debt accumulation, on yield chasing dynamic regardless of the risks involved and on financial engineering to satisfy the financial market’s demand for vastly magnified risk appetites.

In short, low interest rates incentivize asset bubble formation and pricing mismatches.

I have met several people who expressed interest (without my prodding in fact I told them to study first) to place in the stock markets simply due to the nugatory returns from bank accounts.

That’s why negative real rates has been a major contributor to the proliferation of fraudulent activities such as Ponzi schemes (the Aman futures as discussed last week[12]) or even to the current international Ponzi financing scheme of manipulating prices of the financial asset markets (bonds and stocks) through central banking QEs.

For instance, aside from the unsustainable banking-sovereign bond buying feedback mechanism engineered by central banks and governments of crisis stricken developed economies, and the explosive growth in global derivatives exposure, the shadow banking system have reportedly ballooned to nearly 100% of the global economy[13].

In other words, negative real rates regime and various QEs by major central banks has enabled, facilitated and fomented a massive inflation of dollar financial claims complimented by a build-up in the global currency credit system.

clip_image007
Yet more signs of market’s reaction to bubble policies.

The financialization of the US, or the rapidly expanding share of financial industry relative to the US economy[14] (top chart), appears to coincide with the systemic credit or total credit market growth, which now stands at 369% of the US GDP (lowest pane).

This comes in the face of the decline of “buy and hold” strategy[15] employed by US asset investors which concomitantly come under a secular declining trend of interest rates.

The financial industry, which has expanded based on credit inflation, seems to have shifted investor’s attitudes where the incentives to “buy and hold” have been reduced and where shorter time frame holdings of assets, and or perhaps a high frequency of transactional churning, have been encouraged through social (monetary, financial and administrative) policies.

In other words, the policies of low interest and negative real rates have been instrumental in spurring debt driven bubble cycles.

The fact that many people in the Philippines resort to superficial justifications, such as the Pollyannaish outlook predicated on claims of supposed macroeconomic progress, are indications of a bubble afflicted yield chasing mindset.

To suggest that low interest environment will not lead to asset bubbles is based the fallacious doctrine that views people as behaving like automatons, and where rules, regulations, edicts and decrees, have neutral effects on individuals.

This can be analogized to the self-exculpation act by Pontius Pilate[16] on the ordering the execution of Jesus by washing his hands.

This is also like arguing that getting drunk or intoxicated is not caused by swilling of alcohol.

Also Philippine authorities presume that they can identify or “lean against the wind” and put a freeze in due time, by pricking the formative bubbles. This presumes they have a full understanding of how everybody thinks and acts. They pretend to possess omniscience.

In addition, such authorities fail to explain how a reversal of such policies will impact the local political economy and the marketplace.

The Venezuelan experience shows that policymakers would rather tinker with, and manipulate statistics, to advance the Potemkin village of economic growth, instead of addressing the real concerns.

There are political aspects from which such policies have been targeted at or have an effect on (intended or otherwise). And reversals of such policies will likely go in conflict and produce undesired effects that may put in jeopardy the interests of the political powers that be.

Example, if raising interest rates will hurt the stock and bond markets, how will this affect the electoral odds for the incumbent’s handpicked members of his political party during the 2013 elections? 

Said differently, could today’s boom been designed as part of the incumbent’s political strategy to increase the odds of an electoral victory for his party?

The Inflationary Boom, Telecom Smear Campaign, Gold’s Revival

clip_image009
The reality is that the fresh landmark high attained by the Philippine Phisix this week has been propelled by a tailwind which brought about a 2.08% advance.

Unknown to most, Philippine central bank’s, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), has been the most aggressive in the campaign onslaught against domestic interest rates or in implementing credit easing among the ASEAN peers.

I previously wrote that Asia’s stock market trends have reflected on the direction of interest rates[17]

On the back of this week’s gains, the Phisix has overtaken Thailand’s SET with a 27% year-to-date return as of Friday’s close, and has been Asia’s third best, behind Pakistan’s Karachi 100 up 43.09% year to date and Laos’ Laos Securities 37.09%

clip_image011
Again, the Philippines among the major ASEAN contemporaries has been the most aggressive in adapting credit easing policies via interest rate cuts.

Many have even been speculating that the BSP will further cut interest rates to reduce the strength of the Peso[18].

As a side note, I think that the pronouncements by establishment experts on the prospective actions of the BSP acts seem more about implied lobbying through disinformation channeled through mainstream media.

The desire for credit expansion seems like narcotic addiction, which only will deepen the malinvestments which will have adverse repercussions overtime.

As the great Ludwig von Mises warned[19],
The point of view prevails generally among politicians, business people, the press and public opinion that reducing the interest rates below those developed by market conditions is a worthy goal for economic policy, and that the simplest way to reach this goal is through expanding bank credit. Under the influence of this view, the attempt is undertaken, again and again, to spark an economic upswing through granting additional loans. At first, to be sure, the result of such credit expansion comes up to expectations. Business is revived. An upswing develops. However, the stimulating effect emanating from the credit expansion cannot continue forever. Sooner or later, a business boom created in this way must collapse.
Recently, the Philippine government seems to be harassing or has been putting select industries in negative spotlight either for political reasons (2013 elections) or for financing or as political charade of “doing something” to generate approval ratings. Such actions doesn’t seem to signal “promoting competitiveness” contra mainstream suggestions.

Last week, the government through the industry regulator accused the top 2 private telecom firms as having “overcharged” consumers[20], stemming from last year’s directive to reduce interconnection charges which were supposedly meant as “pass through to consumers”. This has alleged been by part of “the directive to make text messaging more affordable to the public, pursuant to directives from the Office of the President”

The reality is that the Office of the President has nothing to do with “affordable text messaging”, claims of which represents no less than unalloyed propaganda. The laws of economics cannot be controlled by mere fiat.

The real reason why prices of text messaging and other mobile services have been plunging worldwide has been because of productivity enhancements from market based competition[21] aided by technological advances.

The fact is that the domestic industries’ inefficiencies have been rooted from interventionism mostly via overregulation[22].

Yet if the Philippine government sincerely desires to promote consumer welfare as publicized, the way to do is to abolish foreign ownership restrictions, the congressional franchise and the National Telecom Commissions (NTC) all of which constitutes anti-competitive laws and regulations and of the protection of the entrenched groups connected with political elite.

Previously stateless Somalia, ironically, has garnered the acclaim of having the “best telecommunications in Africa”, with about 10 “fiercely competitive telephone companies” providing wireless technology, charging "the lowest international rates on the continent” and the “cheapest cellular calling rates”[23]

Stateless yes, but highly progressive telecom industry.

The real point has been to discredit the telecoms company as part of the smear campaign to create a popular moral backlash against the telecom industry in order to justify the SMS tax, promoted by the IMF[24].

Telecoms, like the mining sector, have been used by the political class as a milking cow. And the government has been conjuring up phony moral excuses to forcibly extract more taxes from private companies.

Moreover, printing money or credit expansion will never solve a problem caused by regulatory inhibitions or anti-business policies regardless of what statistics say. Such views naively oversimplify a rather complex world.

Importantly, overcharging shouldn’t be just applied to the telecom companies, the table should be turned where overcharging should also be pinned on the extravagance and insatiability of governments to incessantly work on extorting more taxes from the entrepreneurs, capitalists and investors by using “social justice” as pretext to benefit political boondoggles.

As the late libertarian economist and founder of Foundation for Economic Education Leonard Read[25] pointed out as quoted by Professor Gary Galles[26],
In the practice of so-called social justice, the individual is ignored…Social justice is the game of “robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul.” This form of political behavior seeks the gain of some at the expense of others… it is the thwarting of justice that begs our censure.
clip_image013
Industries persecuted by the government have apparently struggled, been at the tailend or became laggards. 

So far, the inflationary boom which has been conspicuous through the outstanding advances by the Financial, Property and holding sectors, has failed to give these sectors a lift.

Nevertheless, much of what I have been predicting seems to be taking hold, as global financial markets shift into high gear towards a risk ON environment. The yearend rally seems in motion.

As I wrote last September[27],
I believe that the interim response from the FED-ECB policies, designed to prop up financial assets, will likely provide strong support to the global stock markets including the Philippine Phisix perhaps until the yearend, at least.

The mining index, which has underperformed all sectors, will likely expunge its year to date losses at least by the yearend.
I believe that the complexion of relative performances will change as the upside momentum deepens and should imply for a spillover if not a rotation. 

clip_image015
Given last week’s strong rally by gold relative to the S&P 500, including the seeming recovery of the S&P GSCI Industrial Metal (GYX) Index and the broad based Reuters-CRB (CCI) index, gold mining issues in the US as the Philadelphia Gold & Silver mining Index (XAU) should likely find revitalization soon.

This also extrapolates to the possible inflection point by the domestic mining sector which should just be around the corner.

While no trend moves in a straight line, which means there should be interim corrections, we are likely to see a reinforcement of the yearend rally which perhaps may get extended until the first quarter of 2013.

Again, all will depend on the actions of central bankers in the face of market’s ever fluctuating conditions.



[1] Wikipedia.org Self-serving bias




[5] Businessweek/Bloomberg.com Venezuela Currency Market Sold Fewest Bonds in Two Years November 20, 2012


[7] Eluniversal.com, Venezuela's liquid reserves down 60% in nine months November 23, 2012




[11] Philstar.com Banks feel bite of low interest rates, November 15, 2012



[14] Wikipedia.org Financialization

[15] Charts of the Average Holding period and total credit markets are from Dr. Marc Faber’s Deflationary Bust or Government Profligacy and Money Printing via Zero Hedge, Marc Faber's Chart Porn November 23, 2012

[16] Wikipedia.org Pontius Pilate



[19] Ludwig von Mises, Cyclical Changes in Business Conditions, Mises.org February 13, 2012

[20] Inquirer.net Text overcharging bared November 21, 2012





[25] Wikipedia.org Leonard Read

[26] Gary Galles Justice versus Social Justice Mises.org, November 17, 2011

Friday, April 19, 2013

Inflation and Price Controls: Latin America Edition

I have been saying that price controls functions as the alter ego or the twin sibling of inflationism where both operates under the umbrella of financial repression (euphemism legal plunder of people's resources via social policies). 

I have also been pointing out that depending on statistics (historical data) to establish a theory can hardly be relied on because statistics does not capture real human events, and can be manipulated to serve political goals.

Here is how it works. First government inflates money supply via credit expansion. Next, the resultant higher prices will be blamed on “greed” on the private sector, thus, justifying price controls. Then government imposes price controls and other related restrictions.

Price controls effectively mutes statistical inflation. But on the other hand, price controls provides disincentives for producers to produce, thereby leading to goods shortages, and thus, leads to social deprivation and hardships.

At the end of the day, inflationism-price controls brings about economic crises and social unrest.

Cato’s Steve Hanke says the spreading use of price controls in Latin America, while reducing statistical inflation, has been depriving the public access to goods. (italics original)
Argentina, Venezuela, and now even Ecuador have all embraced an unfortunate, if familiar, economic craze currently sweeping the region – price controls. In a wrong-headed attempt to “suppress” inflation, the respective governments have attempted to fix prices at artificially low levels. As any economist worth his salt knows, this will ultimately lead to scarcity.

Consider Venezuela, where the government sets the price of a number of goods, including premium gasoline, which is fixed at only 5.8 U.S. cents per gallon. As the accompanying chart shows, 20.4% of goods are simply not available in stores.

image
While price controls ostensibly keep the prices of goods on official markets low, they ultimately lead to empty shelves, depriving many consumers access to essential goods (such as toilet paper). This, in turn, leads to “repressed” inflation – given the price controls that exist, the “true” rate of inflation is held down, or repressed through Soviet-style government intervention. As the accompanying chart shows, the implied annual inflation rate for Venezuela (using changes in the black-market VEF/USD exchange rate) puts the “repressed” inflation rate at 153%.

image

Likewise, Argentina is facing a similar dilemma (see the accompanying chart).

image

In addition to scarcity and repressed inflation, price controls can lead to unintended political consequences down the road. Once price controls are implemented it is very difficult to remove them without generating popular unrest – just consider the 1989 riots in Venezuela when President Carlos Perez attempted to remove price controls.
This only proves my observations that Venezuela and Argentina, as enduring episodes of hyperinflation (the new generation of Zimbabwes), although at different stages; Venezuela is at a more advanced state relative to Argentina’s incipient phase from earlier stagflation.

I expect stagflation-hyperinflation to occur in many parts of the world as governments rely on the printing press and financial repression to advance their interests.

Tuesday, February 01, 2011

How Socialism Aggravates Harm from Natural Disasters: The Venezuelan Experience

The destructive side effects of Socialism are amplified by national disasters. Venezuela is an example.

Wall Street Journal’s Mary O’Grady writes, (bold highlights mine)

Most of Venezuela's democratic institutions have been destroyed by Mr. Chávez. But Caracas is still not Pyongyang or Havana, and a groundswell of popular dissatisfaction could yet unseat him. His favored strategy to deal with this risk is spreading government funds around and redistributing private wealth. Yet even as hundreds of millions of dollars have been reallocated under chavismo in the past decade, life for Venezuela's poor has been growing more difficult. Mr. Chávez's popularity has been dropping, as evidenced by the opposition's gains in Congress.

Then came the late November rains.

An estimated 130,000 people were left homeless when the northern tier of the country was hit with torrential downpours that lasted well into December. Their plight has become a main theme in all the president's speeches, and he has been scrambling to find them shelter. They have been sent to live in government clinics and offices, more than 150 hotels and even Miraflores, the presidential palace. At one point Mr. Chávez offered to pitch a Bedouin tent—a gift from the Libyan Moammar Gadhafi—in the garden of the palace to make room for flood victims in his home.

All of this has elevated a structural problem of housing shortages that many of Mr. Chávez's constituents expected him to solve when he came to power. Instead the problem has gotten worse.

According to Aquiles Martini, the president of the Real Estate Chamber of Venezuela, who I interviewed by telephone from Caracas last week, the growing population requires 80,000-100,000 new homes per year. But during chavismo, he says, the country has added, on average, only 40,000 units annually. Venezuela now has a housing deficit of two million units. This explains why so many Venezuelans live in fragile, shanty-town housing and suffer so greatly during natural disasters.

Mr. Martini says 2009 was a good year, with 92,000 new units added to Venezuela's stock. But in 2010 the number dropped to 50,000, and the forecast for next year is still fewer new homes. One reason is the nationalization of companies that produce cement and steel. Venezuelan steel output dropped last year by 40% and cement output by 12%, and this provoked shortages in construction materials.

There are other deterrents. Builders have traditionally protected against inflation, now 30% annually, by indexing their contracts with buyers to cover rising costs during construction. But in 2009 the government outlawed this practice. Last year, accusations that some builders were still trying to hedge led the government to threaten harsh penalties and even jail some individuals. Many private developers have since disappeared. Investors who might like to build an apartment for rental income have also withdrawn from the market because, according to Mr. Martini, landlords no longer have the right to evict if their tenants don't pay.

Natural calamity + a cocktail mix of inflation and many other forms of interventionism= More social suffering.

Friday, May 17, 2013

Venezuela’s Hyperinflation: Toilet Paper Shortages

Inflationism destroys economic calculation and the division of labor. Such has been most evident in nations experiencing extreme form of inflation, particularly hyperinflation such as Venezuela

From the US Today:(hat tip EPJ)
CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) — First milk, butter, coffee and cornmeal ran short. Now Venezuela is running out of the most basic of necessities — toilet paper.
Blaming political opponents for the shortfall, as it does for other shortages, the embattled socialist government says it will import 50 million rolls to boost supplies.

That was little comfort to consumers struggling to find toilet paper on Wednesday.

"This is the last straw," said Manuel Fagundes, a shopper hunting for tissue in downtown Caracas. "I'm 71 years old and this is the first time I've seen this."
Yet inflationism has never been an isolated policy. Inflationism has always been part of a general policy of social repression. Thus, price controls have signfied as inflationism’s alter ego.

More from the same article;
Economists say Venezuela's shortages stem from price controls meant to make basic goods available to the poorest parts of society and the government's controls on foreign currency.

"State-controlled prices — prices that are set below market-clearing price — always result in shortages. The shortage problem will only get worse, as it did over the years in the Soviet Union," said Steve Hanke, professor of economics at Johns Hopkins University.
Politicians have and will always pass the blame on everyone else but themselves. Such would lay the excuse for doing more of the same.

Interventionism begets interventionism until the society collapses.

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Hyperinflation: Venezuela’s Intensifying Stock Market Melt up Amidst a Currency Meltdown

The melt-up of Venezuela’s stock market as measured by the Caracas Stock Market index (IBVC) has been accelerating.

image

Friday’s 5.5% gains is part of to the weekly 18.52% advance. 

Year to date, the same index has been up a whopping 144%. 

Last year, the same index posted around 300% nominal currency gains.

image

This isn’t your conventional stock market boom-bust cycle though. 

Instead Venezuela’s skyrocketing stock markets are symptoms of hyperinflation or a currency crisis. It’s Zimbabwe all over again.

image

Cato’s Steve Hanke has a chart of Venezuela’s currency, the bolivar, as of March 2013.  


The rate of collapse of the bolivar has been inversely reflected on the stock market. Venezuelans have increasingly used stock markets (titles to real assets and capital goods) as shelter to their savings.

If hyperinflation in Venezuela will reach the scale of Zimbabwe, then zooming stock markets would only buy 3 eggs.

Interesting to see in real time, what seems as another fiat money regime on the brink of extinction.

Sunday, October 07, 2012

More on Iran’s Hyperinflation, Venezuela Next?

Professor Steve Hanke has more on the developing hyperinflation in Iran. 

From Prof. Hanke’s 10 facts on Iran’s hyperinflation (Cato Institute) [bold original] 
1. Iran is experiencing an implied monthly inflation rate of 69.6%. For comparison, in the month before the sanctions took effect (June 2010), the monthly inflation rate was 0.698%. 

2.. Iran is experiencing an implied annual inflation rate of 196%. For comparison, in June 2010, the annual (year-over-year) inflation rate was 8.25%. 

3. The current monthly inflation rate implies a price-doubling time of 39.8 days. For certain goods, such as chicken, prices may be doubling at an even faster rate. 

4. The current inflation rate implies an equivalent daily inflation rate of 1.78%. Compare that to the United States, whose annual inflation rate is 1.69%. 

5. Since hyperinflation broke out, Iran’s estimated Hanke Misery Index score has skyrocketed from 106 (September 10th) to 231 (October 2nd).   See the accompanying chart.

clip_image002

6. Iran is the first country in the Middle East to experience hyperinflation.  It is the seventh Muslim country to experience hyperinflation. 

7. Iran’s Hyperinflation is the third hyperinflation episode of the 21st century.  The first was Zimbabwe, in 2008. The second was North Korea, whose episode lasted from 2009-11. 

8. Since the sanctions first took effect, in July 2010, the rial has depreciated by 71.4%. In July 2010, the black-market IRR/USD rate was very close to the official rate of 10,000 IRR/USD. The last reported black-market exchange rate was 35,000 IRR/USD (October 2nd). 

9. At the current monthly inflation rate, Iran’s hyperinflation ranks as the 48th worst case of hyperinflation in history. Iran currently comes in just behind Armenia, which experienced a peak monthly inflation rate of 73.1%, in January 1992. 

10. The Iranian Rial is now the least-valued currency in the world (in nominal terms). In September 2012, the rial passed the Vietnamese dong, which currently has an exchange rate of 20,845 VND/USD.
To add, as I have repeatedly been saying—symptoms of hyperinflation have likewise been manifested or ventilated on the stock market. 

The public’s reaction to the destruction of a currency’s purchasing power has been to seek refuge through securities backed by real assets. 

Traditional financial metrics in a hyperinflation ravaged economy has hardly been a concern because “cash” is under fire. When half of what has been used for transactions or when the conditions of the domestic medium of exchange is being questioned by the markets, then this represents a dysfunctional economy. We don't use conventional measures on an abnormal situation.


image

Thus, under a hyperinflationary environment, hedges or the stampede for safety or preservation of savings against a run on the domestic currency prompts for what would look like a stock market boom 

The same dynamic seems apparent in Iran. The one year chart of Iran’s bellwether the TEDPIX at the Tehran’s Stock Exchange reveals of a 3-month spike as Iran segues into a hyperinflation mode. 

Over 5 years the TEDPIX has risen nearly twofold even as real GDP growth in constant dollars exhibits a stagnation.

image
Iran’s GDP at constant prices (Index Mundi). 

So monetary inflation brings about a parallel universe: rising stocks, stagnating economy.

And another important point: Iran’s experience shows that the emergence of hyperinflation has not been gradual but precipitate. Price inflations as manifestations of monetary disorder always appear suddenly and unexpectedly

People who vastly underestimate the current dynamics of price inflation, as a result of concerted inflationism by global central banks, may likely be surprised by price inflation’s impetuous appearance.

I believe that similar symptoms are being exhibited in Venezuela.

image
Yesterday, the Venezuela’s Caracas benchmark, the IBVC, zoomed by an eye popping 7.98%!! This adds to the amazing weekly gain of 30.98%, and for a year to date return of a whopping 244.78!!! (see chart above from Bloomberg)

Some suggests that this week’s Venezuelan presidential elections have been breathing life into the markets

Yet a huge 67% jump in the incumbent’s the socialist populist Hugo Chavez spending in August may have been instrumental in driving the frenzied boom in Venezuela’s stock markets.

This September Bloomberg article gives us a clue
Chavez’s August spending surge is swelling the budget deficit that will compel him to devalue the currency after the vote to bolster revenue from oil exports and shore up government finances, according to Barclays Plc and Bank of America Corp., which said in a report yesterday that spending grew 41 percent on an inflation-adjusted basis…

“The market is pricing in an imminent currency devaluation in 2013 regardless of who wins,” said Carlos Fuenmayor, the Miami-based chief executive officer of BancTrust & Co., an investment advisory firm
So Mr. Hanke may want to train his eyes on Venezuela, a likely candidate for the next Iran.