Thanks to NIRP and ZIRP; Many Japanese Turn to Crime In Order to Live Off From Prison Welfare

The following serves as wonderful example of how government interventions fundamentally mangle society’s ethical fabric.

Through ZIRP and NIRP or the invisible redistribution/transfers via monetary channels, or the Japanese government’s thrust to inflate her debt away has only led to the crucifixion of Japanese savers.

Destruction of the yen has only shrunk the purchasing power or reduced real income of Japan’s dramatically aging society (yes Japan has a declining to population).

So the expanding paucity of income, such has now spurred many of the elderly to commit crime with the intent to get fed or live by Japan’s prison welfare state.

From CNBC.com (bold added)

Japan's prison system is being driven to budgetary crisis by demographics, a welfare shortfall and a new, pernicious breed of villain: the recidivist retiree. And the silver-haired crooks, say academics, are desperate to be behind bars.

Crime figures show that about 35 per cent of shoplifting offences are committed by people over 60. Within that age bracket, 40 per cent of repeat offenders have committed the same crime more than six times.

There is good reason, concludes a report, to suspect that the shoplifting crime wave in particular represents an attempt by those convicted to end up in prison — an institution that offers free food, accommodation and healthcare.

The mathematics of recidivism are gloomily compelling for the would-be convict. Even with a frugal diet and dirt-cheap accommodation, a single Japanese retiree with minimal savings has living costs more than 25 per cent higher than the meagre basic state pension of Y780,000 ($6,900) a year, according to a study on the economics of elderly crime by Michael Newman of Tokyo-based research house Custom Products Research.

Even the theft of a Y200 sandwich can earn a two-year prison sentence, say academics, at an Y8.4m cost to the state.

The geriatric crime wave is accelerating, and analysts note that the Japanese prison system — newly expanded and at about 70 per cent occupancy — is being prepared for decades of increases. Between 1991 and 2013, the latest year for which the Ministry of Justice publishes figures, the number of elderly inmates in jail for repeating the same offence six times has climbed 460 per cent.

The surging rates of crime among the elderly disguise a darker trend than mere contempt for the law, say economists and criminologists. Retiree crime is rising more quickly than the general demographic ascent into old age that will put 40 per cent of the Japanese population over 65 by the year 2060.

So as the prison system absorbs more people, the government’s budget will have to increase to accommodate this, thus furthering the vicious cycle of bigger debts and the destruction of the yen.

And more affirmation of how inflationism will lead to the destruction of society, from JMKeynes

Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose. 

Updated to add: Sorry for the small font.

Quote of the Day: Europe is Drowning Under the Cost of Welfare Bills

A debt crisis in Europe seems inevitable. Reason? Exploding costs of welfare politics.

Telegraph's Matthew Lynn explains:

Europe’s welfare spending is out of control, and is on a scale that is both lavish and unaffordable compared with the rest of the world. There is a problem, however. Neither she, nor any other political leader in Europe, has the will to do anything about it.

Eurostat, the statistical agency of the European Union, has this week published updated figures on the total welfare bill across Europe. It is rising, and in some countries is getting up to a quarter of national output. Meanwhile, the percentage of spending on stuff like infrastructure or education, which increase an economy’s potential output, is falling.

So long as that is true, it is very hard to see anything other than a bleak future for any of Europe’s economies.

If you dip into the blogs, there is a mildly entertaining debate about whether Merkel’s often-quoted figures are correct. On close inspection, it turns out that nations that make up the EU currently account for 7.2pc of the world’s population and a shade over a quarter of total output. When the World Bank crunched the numbers on social spending, however, it found that in fact Europe accounts for a massive 58pc of global welfare spending.

What is certainly true is that Europe’s welfare budget has turned into a juggernaut that is careering out of control. On the World Bank data, the United States accounts for 18.8pc of global welfare spending, as you might expect from the world’s biggest economy. But Germany, around a third of its size, currently spends 12.5pc of the global total. France, a smaller country still, accounts for 9.9pc. The UK racks up close on 7pc. Contrast that with some far bigger, and faster- growing, countries. China, with 20 times our population, accounts for 2.4pc of the total. Russia accounts for 2pc and India just 0.6pc.

According to Eurostat, the total cost of welfare across the EU now amounts to 19.5pc of total GDP, compared with 17.5pc as recently as 2006. If you restrict that to the eurozone countries, the total rises to 20.5pc. In Denmark and France it is now close on 25pc.

For all that the Left complains about austerity in this country, our total spending on social protection is only slightly below the European average at 16.5pc of GDP. In controversial areas such as disability benefits, where the Government has now abandoned some modest cuts, we are in line with the EU average, spending 2.8pc of GDP. (Our welfare bill is only less than average because a fantastic performance on job creation means we spend just 0.2pc of GDP on unemployment, compared with a eurozone average of 1.8pc, and 2pc in a country such as France).

Overall, in almost every country, it is going up. With ageing populations, that is hardly likely to decrease – poverty-stricken Greece is now spending 15pc of GDP on pensions, and Italy 14pc. Europe is literally drowning under the cost of its welfare bills.

Quote of the Day: This Time is Different: Sovereign Debt Crisis will Wipe Out Pensions

Why is this Sovereign Debt Crisis collapse different from 1931? When the governments of the world defaulted on their debts in 1931, there were no pension funds. Government has exempted itself from all prudent reason for you take the state operated pension funds, like Social Security in the USA, where 100% of the money is in government bonds. They may have no intention of defaulting, but very few government have ever paid off their debts in the end. 

Then there are states who regulate pension funds requiring more than 80% to be in government bonds. A Sovereign Debt Default this time around will wipe out socialism, yet the bulk of the people are clueless not merely about the risk, but the ramifications. Younger generations do not save to support their parents for that was government’s job post-Great Depression. Socialism has altered thousands of years of family structure following the ranting of Karl Marx. This has been one giant lab experiment that ended badly in China and Russia and is coming to a local government near you. 

So this time it is SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT. Government is now on the hook, which is part of the reason why they are moving to eliminate cash to prevent bank runs and to force society to comply with their demands. This is why we have people like Gordon Brown, who sold Britain’s gold reserves in 1999 making the low, claiming now that eliminating cash will eliminate the boom and bust of the business cycle. Let’s face it, Gordon Brown has NEVER been right when it comes to politics, not even once, and he has been the worst manager of finance that Britain has ever known. He sold the low in gold and now he presumes he can fulfill Marxism by eliminating cash. He postulates ideas that are theory without any support whatsoever. We cannot afford more arrogant people like this in politics who believe they have a right to experiment with society. 

This time it is very different. They have wiped out society placing the entire scheme of socialism as a terrible nightmare that will end badly, and they have ruined the social family structure disarming people that for thousands of years was our very means of self-sufficient survival. These clown have set the tone for wiping out the dreams they sold the elderly, all while hunting taxes and causing job creation to implode as the youth has been converted into the lost generation. All this with pretend good intentions. Can you imagine the damage to society if they had actually intended this mess? They have lied to themselves and to the people. We have to crash and burn – that part is inevitable. Only when the economy turns down will we then argue over solutions.

(italics mine)

This is from economist Martin Armstrong from his website.

Related to  this, for all the economic 'boom' projected by record stocks, the Bloomberg recently reported that 32 out of 50 or 64% of US states have been faced with budget gaps and thus have been making cuts, tapping reserves or face higher budget shortfalls. And the same report says that state governments have only about half of reserves compared to the pre recession era.

And due to pension concerns Moody's recently downgraded Chicago. 

Puerto Rico which is categorized as Unincorporated territory of the US has  currently been enduring a debt crisis, that has put to risk social services provided by socialism.

Data on US State fiscal and debt conditions can be found here.

Additionally the pension warning doesn't just apply to the US but to many other developed economies as well (OECD data as % of GDP  here).

Crashing Oil Prices: OPEC Deadlock, Shale Bubble, Global Liquidity and Philippine OFWs

I recently pointed out that October brought upon us the reality of real time crashes—a dynamic we have not seen since 2008.

In spite of the ECB-PBOC-BOJ fueled stock market boom, crashes seem to be still haunting global markets

From Reuters:

Saudi Arabia blocked calls on Thursday from poorer members of the OPEC oil exporter group for production cuts to arrest a slide in global prices, sending benchmark crude plunging to a fresh four-year low.

Brent oil fell more than $6 to $71.25 a barrel after OPEC ministers meeting in Vienna left the group's output ceiling unchanged despite huge global oversupply, marking a major shift away from its long-standing policy of defending prices.

This outcome set the stage for a battle for market share between OPEC and non-OPEC countries, as a boom in U.S. shale oil production and weaker economic growth in China and Europe have already sent crude prices down by about a third since June.

The sustained crash in oil prices (WTI left, Brent right) has just been amazing

On the one hand, we see record stocks in developed economies backed by record debt. On the other hand, we see crashing commodities led by oil prices. So the world has been in a stark divergence in terms of market actions. 

Prior to the US prompted global crisis of 2008, divergence in the US housing and stocks heralded the (2008) crash.  US housing began to decline in 2006 as stock markets soared to record highs. When the periphery (housing) hit the core (banking and financial system), the entire floor caved in.

Today’s phenomenon (crashing commodities as well as crashing Macau stocks and earnings) runs parallel to the 2008 crash, except that this comes in a global dimension.

Bulls rationalize that lower oil price benefit consumption. This is true. Theoretically. But what they didn’t explain is why oil prices have collapsed and now nears the 2008 levels. Has this been because of slowing demand (which ironically means diminishing consumption)? If so why the decline in consumption (which contradicts the premise)? 

Or has this been because of excessive supply? Or a combination of both? Or has a meltdown in oil prices been a symptom of something else--deflating bubbles?

Yet how will consumption be boosted? Is consumption all about oil?

If economies like Japan-Eurozone and China have been floundering because of too much debt or have been hobbled by balance sheet problems that necessitates for central bank interventions, how will low oil prices improve demand? Well my impression is that low oil prices may alleviate only the consumer’s position, but this won’t justify a consumption based boom. 

Again the problem seems to be why prices are at current levels?

From the production side, what collapsing oil prices means is that oil producing emerging markets will likely get hit hard…

The above indicates nations dependent on oil revenues.

Oil production share of GDP won’t be much a concern if not for the role of domestic political spending (welfare state) which oil revenues finance…

At current levels, almost every fiscal position (welfare state) of oil producing nations will be in the red.

This simply means several interrelated variables, namely, economies of these oil producing nations will see a sharp economic slowdown, the ensuing economic downturn will bring to the limelight public and private debt problems thereby magnifying credit risks (domestic and international), a downshift in the economy would mean growing fiscal deficits that will be reflected on their respective currencies where the former will be financed and the latter defended by the draining of foreign exchange reserves or from external borrowing and importantly prolonged low oil prices and expanded fiscal deficits would eventually extrapolate to increased incidences of Arab Springs or political turmoil.

But the implications extend overseas.

I have pointed out in the past that any attempt to use oil prices as ‘weapon’ (predatory pricing) to weed out market based competitors, particularly Shale oil, will fail over long term

But over the interim, collapsing oil prices will have nasty consequences for the US energy sector, particularly the downscaling, reduction or cancellation of existing projects and most importantly growing credit risks from the industry's overleveraging.

The Shale industry has been a part of the US Fed inflated bubble.

Notes the CNBC: (bold mine)

Employment in the oil and gas sector has grown more than 72 percent to 212,200 in the last decade as technology such as horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing have made it possible to reach fossil fuels that were previously too expensive to extract. In order to fund the rapid growth, exploration and production companies have borrowed heavily. The energy sector accounts for 17.4 percent of the high-yield bond market, up from 12 percent in 2002, according to Citi Research.

Falling oil prices will increase credit risks of US energy producers, from the Telegraph

Based on recent stress tests of subprime borrowers in the energy sector in the US produced by Deutsche Bank, should the price of US crude fall by a further 20pc to $60 per barrel, it could result in up to a 30pc default rate among B and CCC rated high-yield US borrowers in the industry. West Texas Intermediate crude is currently trading at multi-year lows of around $75 per barrel, down from $107 per barrel in June.

Collapsing oil prices will thus prick on the current Shale oil bubble.

But the basic difference between oil producing welfare states and debt financed market based Shale oil producers have been in the political baggage that the former carries. 

The current bubbles seen in the energy sector implies that inefficient producers today will simply be replaced by more efficient producers overtime. The industry will experience a painful market clearing adjustment process but Shale energy won’t go away.

The damage will be magnified in terms of political dimensions of welfare states of oil producing nations.

And as previously noted, the non-cooperation or perceived persecution of rival oil producing nations will have geopolitical consequences. There may be attempts by rogue groups financed by rival nations to disrupt or sabotage production lines in order to forcibly reduce supplies. This will only heighten geopolitical risks.

In addition, since forex reserves of producing nations will be used to finance domestic welfare state and defend the currency, such will reduce liquidity in the system

As the Zero Hedge duly notes: (bold italics original)

As Reuters reports, for the first time in almost two decades, energy-exporting countries are set to pull their "petrodollars" out of world markets this year, citing a study by BNP Paribas (more details below). Basically, the Petrodollar, long serving as the US leverage to encourage and facilitate USD recycling, and a steady reinvestment in US-denominated assets by the Oil exporting nations, and thus a means to steadily increase the nominal price of all USD-priced assets, just drove itself into irrelevance.

A consequence of this year's dramatic drop in oil prices, the shift is likely to cause global market liquidity to fall, the study showed.

This decline follows years of windfalls for oil exporters such as Russia, Angola, Saudi Arabia and Nigeria. Much of that money found its way into financial markets, helping to boost asset prices and keep the cost of borrowing down, through so-called petrodollar recycling.

But no more: "this year the oil producers will effectively import capital amounting to $7.6 billion. By comparison, they exported $60 billion in 2013 and $248 billion in 2012, according to the following graphic based on BNP Paribas calculations."

In short, the Petrodollar may not have died per se, at least not yet since the USD is still holding on to the reserve currency title if only for just a little longer, but it has managed to price itself into irrelevance, which from a USD-recycling standpoint, is essentially the same thing.

According to BNP, Petrodollar recycling peaked at $511 billion in 2006, or just about the time crude prices were preparing to go to $200, per Goldman Sachs. It is also the time when capital markets hit all time highs, only without the artificial crutches of every single central bank propping up the S&P ponzi house of cards on a daily basis. What happened after is known to all...

"At its peak, about $500 billion a year was being recycled back into financial markets. This will be the first year in a long time that energy exporters will be sucking capital out," said David Spegel, global head of emerging market sovereign and corporate Research at BNP.

Spegel acknowledged that the net withdrawal was small. But he added: "What is interesting is they are draining rather than providing capital that is moving global liquidity. If oil prices fall further in coming years, energy producers will need more capital even if just to repay bonds."

In other words, oil exporters are now pulling liquidity out of financial markets rather than putting money in. That could result in higher borrowing costs for governments, companies, and ultimately, consumers as money becomes scarcer.

It’s interesting to note how some major oil producers have seen some major selling pressures in their stock markets…

Kuwait Stock Exchange

Saudi Arabia’s Tadawul

Oman’s MSM

Nigerian stock Exchange

The pressures have likewise been reflected on their currencies: USD-Kuwait Dinar, USD-Saudi Riyal and Nigeria’s Naira.

For the populist Philippine G-R-O-W-T-H story, if the Middle East runs into economic and financial trouble or if the collapse in oil prices triggers the region’s bubble to deflate, then how will this translate into OFW “remittance” growth? The largest deployment of OFWs  has been in the Middle East. Or is it that OFWs are immune to the region’s woes?

Interesting.

Has the French Atlas Shrugged Moment Arrived?

In the dystopian classic one of the world’s best selling novel, Atlas Shrugged, written by the great philosopher, novelist and free market champion Ayn Rand, deepening government intervention in a society has led the wealthiest to refuse paying soaring taxes and to reject government regulations by shutting down vital industries and the economy.

It seems that we are witnessing a real time “Atlas Shrugged” moment in France such that even establishment media seem to acknowledge the gravely flawed political economic model.

The Newsweek recently published an article by Janine di Giovanni depicting the Atlas Shrugged moment entitled "The Fall of France".

Some excerpts (hat tip Cato’s Dan Mitchell)

Since the arrival of Socialist President François Hollande in 2012, income tax and social security contributions in France have skyrocketed. The top tax rate is 75 percent, and a great many pay in excess of 70 percent.

As a result, there has been a frantic bolt for the border by the very people who create economic growth – business leaders, innovators, creative thinkers, and top executives. They are all leaving France to develop their talents elsewhere…

This angry outburst came from a lawyer friend who is leaving France to move to Britain to escape the 70 percent tax he pays. He says he is working like a dog for nothing – to hand out money to the profligate state. The man he was pointing to, in a swanky Japanese restaurant in the Sixth Arrondissement, is Pierre Moscovici, the much-loathed minister of finance. Moscovici was looking very happy with himself. Does he realize Rome is burning?…

The curse of the welfare state…

But the past two years have seen a steady, noticeable decline in France. There is a grayness that the heavy hand of socialism casts. It is increasingly difficult to start a small business when you cannot fire useless employees and hire fresh new talent. Like the Huguenots, young graduates see no future and plan their escape to London.

The official unemployment figure is more than 3 million; unofficially it’s more like 5 million. The cost of everyday living is astronomical. Paris now beats London as one of the world’s most expensive cities. A half liter of milk in Paris, for instance, costs nearly $4 – the price of a gallon in an American store…

Part of this is the fault of the suffocating nanny state. Ten years ago this week, I left my home in London for a new life in Paris. Having married a Frenchman and expecting our child, I was happily trading in my flat in Notting Hill for one on the Luxembourg Gardens.

At that time, prices were such that I could trade a gritty but charming single-girl London flat for a broken-down family apartment in the center of Paris. Then prices began to steadily climb. With the end of the reign of Gaullist (conservative) Nicolas Sarkozy (the French hated his flashy bling-bling approach) the French ushered in the rotund, staid Hollande.

Almost immediately, taxes began to rise…

Productive citizens flee as the Santa Claus fund goes dry…

When I began to look around, I saw people taking wild advantage of the system. I had friends who belonged to trade unions, which allowed them to take entire summers off and collect 55 percent unemployment pay. From the time he was an able-bodied 30-year-old, a cameraman friend worked five months a year and spent the remaining seven months collecting state subsidies from the comfort of his house in the south of France.

Another banker friend spent her three-month paid maternity leave sailing around Guadeloupe – as it is part of France, she continued to receive all the benefits.

Yet another banker friend got fired, then took off nearly three years to find a new job, because the state was paying her so long as she had no job. “Why not? I deserve it,” she said when I questioned her. “I paid my benefits into the system.” Hers is an attitude widely shared.

When you retire, you are well cared for. There are 36 special retirement regimes – which means, for example, a female hospital worker or a train driver can retire earlier than those in the private sector because of their “harsh working conditions,” even though they can never be fired.

But all this handing out of money left the state bankrupt…

The most brilliant minds of France are escaping to London, Brussels, and New York rather than stultify at home. Walk down a street in South Kensington – the new Sixth Arrondissement of London – and try not to hear French spoken. The French lycee there has a long waiting list for French children whose families have emigrated.

Read the rest here

So no matter how mainstream media portrays improving statistics or rising financial markets as signs of recovery, in the real world, for as long as the government wages war on her productive citizens, real economic recovery will hardly materialize.

And considering France’s ballooning debt (measured by debt to GDP which stands at 90% as of 2012), soaring yields of French bonds (10 year as shown in the chart above from Bloomberg), which extrapolates to higher cost of servicing debt amidst economic stagnation, will equally make the highly levered French economy vulnerable.

Importantly, given the global dynamic of rising bond yields, France may serve as another potential trigger for a Black Swan event in 2014.

Detroit: US Largest City to File for Bankruptcy

As US stock markets soar to record highs, Michigan’s most populous city of Detroit once the cradle of the US automobile industry files for bankruptcy

From the BBC:

The US city of Detroit in Michigan has become the largest American city ever to file for bankruptcy, with debts of at least $15bn (£10bn).

State-appointed emergency manager Kevyn Orr asked a federal judge to place the city into bankruptcy protection.

If it is approved, he would be allowed to liquidate city assets to satisfy creditors and pensions.

Detroit stopped unsecured-debt payments last month to keep the city running as Mr Orr negotiated with creditors.

He proposed a deal last month in which creditors would accept 10 cents for every dollar they were owed.

But two pension funds representing retired city workers resisted the plan. Thursday's bankruptcy filing comes days ahead of a hearing that would have tried to stop the city from making such a move.

A Wall Street Journal report estimates “Municipal-worker retirees are set to get less than 10% of what they are owed under the plan.” Ouch.

Detroit's riches to rags synopsis from the same BBC article:

The city, once renowned as a manufacturing powerhouse, has struggled with its finances for some time, driven by a number of factors, including a steep population loss.

The murder rate is at a 40-year high and only one third of the its ambulances were in service in early 2013.

Declining investment in street lights and emergency services have made it difficult to police the city.

And Detroit's government has been hit by a string of corruption scandals over the years.

Between 2000-10, the number of residents declined by 250,000 as residents moved away.

Detroit is only the latest US city to file for bankruptcy in recent years.

In 2012, three California cities - Stockton, Mammoth Lakes and San Bernardino - took the step.

In 2011, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania tried to file for bankruptcy but the move was ruled illegal.

But Thursday's move in Detroit is significantly larger than any of the earlier filings.

Detroit ranks 9th in terms of highest taxes based on US cities according to the Marketwatch.com. On the obverse side of high taxes has been unsustainable government spending from bureaucracy to welfare.

From Reuters:

Detroit's state and local tax burden as a percentage of annual family income surpassed the average for other large U.S. cities. For example, the tax burden at the $25,000 income level was 13.1 percent in Detroit versus an average of 12.3 percent.

Buss said that Detroit has seen a significant expansion in deficit spending over the last two years, reaching an accumulated $326.6 million at the end of fiscal 2012 from an accumulated deficit of $196.6 million in fiscal 2011. The city has had a budget deficit every year since 2003…

Total revenue in Detroit has fallen sharply over the last 10 years by over $400 million or 22 percent, according to the analysis. State revenue sharing has also been cut, although the city, which accounts for 7 percent of the state's residents, gets by far the biggest amount on a per capita basis -- $335 per resident -- far more than other Michigan cities with populations over 50,000.

Half of Detroit's top 10 employers are governmental entities, led by the city itself with nearly 11,400 workers, down from 20,800 in 2003, followed by the Detroit Public Schools at 10,951, the report said. Two health care systems and the federal government round out the top five. Chrysler, the only automaker in the group, ranks eighth, employing 4,150 workers, a drop of more than a half from 2003.

Also part of the decline of Detroit has attributed to “raced based” policies which sparked a “White Flight” according to economist Walter Williams.

Local politics shaped by labor activism or labor unions likewise compounded on the loss of competitiveness.

So Detroit seems as the US version of Greece: declining economy predicated on the lack of competitiveness shaped by repressive social policies and by excess political baggage via the welfare and bureaucratic state.

Detroit signifies a harbinger for a world addicted to debt based 'political' consumption spending.

Nonetheless The USA Today lays out “What happens next” or the possible legal steps on the Detroit Bankruptcy 

And furthermore, while Detroit represents the largest city or the largest municipal bankruptcy in history, there are yet other local troubled spots (graphic from New York Times).

Yet if the current inflationary boom in the US morphs into a bust, then we will see even more candidates similar to Detroit. 

Worse, even the US government is at the risk of becoming a Detroit, especially if interest rates (as expressed by the bond markets or of the return of the bond vigilantes) continue with its upside trek.

UK’s Blossoming Libertarian Movement?; The Clash of Generations

The libertarian movement seems to be blossoming among English youths.

The Economist observes:

Polls show that the young are more relaxed than others about drugs, sex, alcohol, euthanasia and non-traditional family structures. They dislike immigration, but not as strongly as do their elders. And they are becoming ever more liberal. The BSA has tracked attitudes for three decades. It shows that the young are now far more tolerant of homosexuality, for example, than were previous generations at the same age.

Experimenters with new technologies, fashions and ideas, young people in Britain and elsewhere have long tweaked established social institutions. But their iconoclasm goes further than this. Young Britons are classical liberals: as well as prizing social freedom, they believe in low taxes, limited welfare and personal responsibility. In America they would be called libertarians.

Here is where it gets interesting:

More than two-thirds of people born before 1939 consider the welfare state “one of Britain’s proudest achievements”. Less than one-third of those born after 1979 say the same. According to the BSA, members of Generation Y are not just half as likely as older people to consider it the state’s responsibility to cover the costs of residential care in old age. They are also more likely to take such a hard-hearted view than were members of the famously jaded Generation X (born between 1966 and 1979) at the same stage of life.

The above shows of the intensifying generational conflict brought about by the welfare state.

People “born before 1939” have been the primary beneficiaries of UK’s welfare programs which originated during the 1906-1914 Liberal Welfare Reforms era.  In a Ponzi scheme, they represent the initial investors whose "return" “are “paid out of the investments of new entrants”.  

The new entrants in today’s Ponzi-welfare programs are the young generation, who plays the role of funding the entitlements of the Liberal Welfare generation, which has been intermediated by UK’s welfare state. 

The fragile state of UK’s fiscal conditions reveals that welfare expenditures account for the 25.9% of GDP according to the Wikipedia.org.  This has substantially contributed to the UK’s deteriorating debt conditions now at 90% of GDP. The above chart reveals of the breakdown of UK’s government spending budget

Given the increasing burden from entitlements which has been shouldered by today’s youths, welfare programs are getting to be less appreciated. The wider the generation gap, the more likely resistance on welfare policies.

Add to this globalization and the deepening of the information age,  the rise of UK classical liberals would seem like a natural outgrowth

Yet should libertarian politics deepen, this will likely worsen generational conflict at the risks of triggering social upheaval. Parasites will struggle to resist from losing their hosts.

Nonetheless UK classical liberal-libertarians seem as gaining significant grounds in terms of politics. 

The UK’s Independence Party (UKIP) said to be a democratic libertarian party headed by Nigel Farage may win next year’s European Parliament elections.

From Daily Mail

David Cameron expects the UK Independence Party to win next year’s European Parliament elections despite his pledge to hold an in/out referendum on Europe.

A senior Conservative source said it was now taken as a ‘reasonable assumption’ in Downing Street that UKIP would top the poll next May – sparking a fresh round of Tory bloodletting on Europe just 12 months before the General Election.

The UKIP also performed strongly in the latest local elections.

From the Telegraph:

Nigel Farage, the party’s leader, was jubilant after it emerged that one in four voters supported Ukip in the elections in 35 councils in England and Wales.

The rise of the party cost the Conservatives three local authorities, although Ukip did not win control of any councils.

So the rising politics of decentralization or the renaissance of classical liberalism likewise chimes with the deepening of the information age.

Incidentally, in the latest protest against the Turkish government, this headline seem to herald the spreading of classical liberal-libertarian movement across the world (hat tip Cato’s David Boaz)

Protesters are young, libertarian and furious at Turkish PM, says survey

How the Welfare State Promotes Violence: The Swedish Edition

One of the least expected places for social upheavals to occur is Sweden.

Image from the Guardian

Why is this happening? 

The prolific Simon Black of the Sovereign Man eloquently explains (bold mine)

Anytime a free market guy rails against central planning and socialism, there is always someone who stands up and says “what about Sweden?” 

Ah, Sweden… a socialist’s paradise… a place where taxes are among the highest in the world, few people are wealthy, and the government is involved in people’s lives from cradle to grave.

And in all of these government surveys on ‘happiness’, places like Sweden, Norway, and Denmark consistently rank among the happiest countries in the world.

Well… the veneer is cracking.

Though the coverage has been limited, there’s been rioting in Sweden over the past week, specifically in the immigrant-dense suburbs around Stockholm where 80% of the population are first or second-generation immigrants.

Dan West, my right hand man at Sovereign Man, is actually Swedish and on the ground right now in the country. He recently sent me a note describing the situation:

“Hundreds of cars are burning. Schools were set on fire. Police stations were set on fire. Businesses were vandalized. Rioters clashed with police. Hundreds of masked rioters ran wild in the streets.

Seeing photos and video of this you’d think it was a war zone in some unstable part of the world, not Stockholm.

Allegedly it started last week because the police fatally shot a 69-year-old man who wielded a machete in public. Now people are angry and destroying things.

Swedish politicians say the root causes of these riots are inequality of the immigrant minorities.

Bear in mind, this is a place so obsessed with equality that the words “him” and “her” have been blended into “hem”… and taxpayers fork over 70% of their income to ensure that everyone can live to an equal level.

But to those of us living outside of this statist bubble, the real problem is obvious: however well-intentioned they may be, welfare states almost always attract people who want to be taken care of at the expense of others.

And ultimately this engenders serious conflict… between those who are on the receiving end, and those on the paying end.

Occasionally this conflict becomes violent. And that’s exactly what’s been playing out.

The government has all sorts of propaganda to influence the way Swedes view the welfare state and convince us that we should pay huge taxes to support others.

In other words, we should not be economically free so that others can live for free. This is the definition of a welfare state.

And in addition to such ‘thought controls’, the Swedish government also rules with capital controls, people controls, and media controls.

The government here tries to churn citizens out as if we’re widgets coming off a factory line, influencing everything from what we think to how we spend our time.

Yet despite such a finely-tuned system, the capital suburbs practically turned into a war zones over the past week.

The politicians here claim it can all be fixed with more redistribution of wealth. It’s not enough that the average working Swede pays ~70% in taxes; if only they could extract 80% or 90% in taxes, they could solve everything!

If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

People have the wrong idea of this place. It is not a well-functioning welfare state. Any system based on giving people something for nothing, and sticking hard-working, productive citizens with the bill, is doomed to fail. Sweden is no exception.

People in North America who are rapidly being dragged into a welfare state should pay very close attention… because this is the future that awaits.”

The Zero Hedge adds more to the Swedish Welfare dilemma:

The recent riots in Stockholm may highlight widening divisions within Swedish society generated by rising inequality, cuts in welfare spending and a failure to integrate immigrants. Inequality has increased the most in Sweden of any OECD member country over the past 25 years.

Inequality

Inequality has increased by one-third since 1985, according to the OECD. Sweden has dropped to 10th place from first in 1995 in the OECD’s ranking of income distribution after the nation’s Gini coefficient rose to 0.27 from 0.21.The average income of the top 10 percent of income earners was more than six times that of the bottom 10 percent in 2008. That compares with a ratio of about four to one during the 1990s.

Immigration

The incidence of child poverty is more than five times as common to people whose parents were born outside Sweden, a report from Save the Children Sweden shows. Those born outside the country account for 14.3 percent of the population of 9.1 million. Sweden ranked fourth in terms of the total number of asylum seekers and second in terms of the number of asylum seekers relative to the population, according to UN data comparing 44 countries.

Employment Gap

Sweden has one of the largest employment gaps between natives and foreign-born residents of any OECD country. Employment rates between local and immigrant workers differ by more than 30 percentage points in some areas, according to Statistics Sweden. The unemployment rate among immigrants from countries outside the EU was 16.5 percent in 2011, compared with 5.7 percent for native Swedes, Statistics Sweden says.

Redistribution

Sweden’s welfare state has been squeezed by about 140 billion kronor of tax cuts since 2006, Eurostat data show. That has contributed to tax revenue as a share of GDP falling to 44.3 percent, below Denmark’s figure of 47.7 percent in 2011. Income taxes and cash benefits play a greater role in redistributing income in Sweden, reducing inequality by about 30 percent, compared with an OECD average of 25 percent.

A society that depends heavily on welfare state produces both political and income inequality as revealed by the brewing frictions between natives and foreign born residents in Sweden.

Yet the welfare state has been enabled and facilitated by debt and inflation which are the pillars of the paper money system.

As the great Ludwig von Mises wrote in Liberty and Property:

The welfare state with its methods of easy money, credit expansion and undisguised inflation continually takes bites out of all claims payable in units of the nation’s legal tender. The self-styled champions of the common man are still guided by the obsolete idea that a policy that favors the debtors at the expense of the creditors is very beneficial to the majority of the people. Their inability to comprehend the essential characteristics of the market economy manifests itself also in their failure to see the obvious fact that those whom they feign to aid are creditors in their capacity as savers, policy holders, and owners of bonds.

Today’s global polices have clearly been designed to favor the debtors over creditors. Such been primarily meant to boost the insolvent welfare states, their clients, patrons (political agents, banking system) and other related interests (cronies).

Nonetheless when parasites dominate the hosts, as revealed by the immense and unsustainable accretion of government debts and by the intensifying use of financial repression (negative interest rates, QE) that ”bites out of all claims payable in units of the nation’s legal tender”, such are signs of desperation that exposes the growing fragility and vulnerability of the welfare state which has painted itself to a corner. 

The Santa Claus principle is in a self-liquidates mode

Events in Sweden is a harbinger of things to come.