Thursday, October 13, 2011

Occupy Wall Street: More Evidence of President Obama’s Re-election Campaign

I harbored suspicions that Occupy Wall Street could be part of President Obama’s re-election campaign strategy. And the unfolding events seem to be validating my position.

From Intelhub.com

As the Occupy Wall Street protests have grown and evolved we have seen a major change in overall direction coming from the most vocal supporters.

While many still claim that this is not a political movement, the unfortunate fact is that everyday we see more and more evidence that the establishment left has, at least in part, co opted the movement.

Yesterday’s so called Millionaires March has drawn major media attention around the world, with support popping up in places that most wouldn’t think would support protesters targeting the financial district.

Linette Lopez, writing for the Business Insider, revealed that the real powers behind the march were numerous extreme leftist organizations with open socialist and communist ties.

Now here’s who they are specifically:

-The Working Families Party

-UnitedNY

-New York Communities for Change

-Strong Economy For All Coalition

-VOCAL-NY

-Community Voices Heard

Those are some pretty established New York groups that span across the state, and they have some powerful people behind them.

So we have super leftist organizations running large scale protests for the Occupy Wall Street protesters yet we are supposed to believe that this is not a political movement?

While it is clear that these organizations do not speak for ALL the protesters, a growing majority are seemingly falling in line with groups who openly support one of Wall Streets biggest supporters, President Barack Obama.

Read the rest here

Considering that President Obama’s approval rating has been drifting at a nadir (record low from many polls as gallup or Quinnipiac University), thereby diminishing his chance of re-election...

clip_image001

From Gallup

And considering that the tea party movement has served as an influential force in shifting the political tide as revealed by the last Congressional elections…

clip_image002

From Reuters.com

President Obama desperately needs a gimmick…and real quick

And there’s no easier way to pander to the masses than to resort to groupthink gimmickry which have mostly been based on class warfare (Buffett Taxes), nationalism (via protectionism also here) and racism.

For the left, desperate times call for desperate measures

Chart of the Day: European Financial Stability Fund

The distribution of the expanded € 780 billion EFSF (source: weltdie.de) [hat tip Antony Mueller]

image

Occupy Wall Street French Edition: Arnaud Montebourg

Riding on the Occupy Wall Street’s theme, aspiring French politician Arnaud Montebourg appears to be making headway in French politics.

From Reuters, (bold emphasis mine)

French Socialist Arnaud Montebourg was eliminated in round one of his party's presidential primary Sunday, but his campaign against globalization, greedy banks and trash TV was such a hit that mainstream leftists may ignore it at their peril.

A 48-year-old lawyer and member of parliament, Montebourg scored a surprise 17 percent in Sunday's vote after proposing during televised Socialist Party debates to put banks on a tight leash and ramp up protectionism…

Montebourg's main proposition is that it is time to do away with the idea that France has no choice but to compete with the likes of China on prices when the latter is unbeatable because of lower social and environmental standards.

At a time when European governments are under pressure to yet again bail out the financial industry, Montebourg has struck a chord in proposing that banks be brought to heel by having the state buy stakes in them and put vote-wielding government officials on their boards.

"All those who have lost out from globalization have heard the proposals for a new France," Montebourg said Sunday.

Mr. Montebourg has essentially not been saying anything new when it comes to French politics, which have long been steeped in socialist democracy, except for imputing the culpability of banks to the ongoing crisis.

Default template

In the Eurozone or in the world, France has not been known as a political haven for capitalism (see Economist chart above)

But as this Economist April article says (bold emphasis mine)

Like their politicians, the French always sound defiantly anti-globalisation. In polls they are far more hostile to free markets than Germans, Chinese or Russians. Yet when it comes to buying or eating foreign stuff, they are as enthusiastic. France is one of the most profitable markets for McDonald’s. Judging by the dress code of French teenagers, there will be long queues outside Abercrombie & Fitch—though whether to buy the hooded tops or to eye up the sales staff may be another question.

Again this serves as another example of “do as I say but not as I do”

This means that for an aspiring politician like Mr. Montebourg, the way to get elected would require staple adherence to socialist rhetoric with a little populist twist—blame capitalist greed on politically privileged banks.

Besides, for Mr. Montebourg to propose more government presence in the banking system is hardly any change. What this does is to formalize or embed what has already been in place, an unsustainable welfare state financed by government protected towards government controlled banks.

clip_image002

Chart from Philipp Bagus

Yes banks, like in the US, have complicit roles played to the respective lingering political economic problem alright, but what Mr. Mountebourg has been missing is that overspending and bubble policies of the welfare state has functioned as the primary reasons for this unfolding crisis.

And institutionalizing government’s presence in the banking system will hardly be the solution; to the contrary this will even exacerbate the existing problems.

Yet despite Mr.Mountebourg’s emergent popularity, French politics has not been representative of the dominant political trend of the Eurozone.

image From the Economist (dated June 7, 2011)

Heritage Foundation Urges Military Action on Iran

The Heritage Foundation has an incredible philosophical dichotomy, where on the one hand they propose free trade, and on the other hand, they propose imperialist policies to defend against terrorism

From Mike Brownfield (bold highlights mine)

The Obama Administration, to date, has pursued the Obama Doctrine–a foreign policy that calls for the United States to engage with its enemies instead of confronting the threat of state-sponsored terrorism head on. It’s an attitude and a posture that has been pervasive in President Obama’s rhetoric–abjuring American exceptionalism, passing on the opportunity to speak loudly to promote the spread of democracy in the Middle East, failing to condemn Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s ruthless regime, offering weak support to Israel and failing to condemn those who threaten the country’s very existence, and presenting a face of international accommodation and ambivalence. Obama’s strategy invites aggression and leaves the American people less secure as a result.

The Administration must finally change direction. Heritage’s James Carafano writes that it should take strong measures to respond to Iran’s actions, including conducting a proportional military response against suitable, feasible, and acceptable targets (in many ways the situation is similar to military operations conducted against al Qaeda in Pakistan). It should impose and enforce the strongest sanctions, target public diplomacy to expose the regime’s human rights abuses, reduce Iran’s meddling in Iraq, and rescind and rewrite its counterterrorism strategy.

The fact is that war and free trade are simply incompatible. Not only does war appropriate resources required for productive economic activities, which likewise has been tied to inflationary policies, war encourages growth of government or statist ‘ratchet effect’ policies in the broader spectrum of the economy in the US and elsewhere. This would be inimical and contradictory to economic freedom and free trade.

Yet militant foreign policy responses would likely trigger retaliatory impulses among those affected by these policies, whose feedback mechanism encourages more ‘terrorism’ instead of quelling it.

Besides to militarily provoke other nations could mean that the law of unintended consequences will apply. It would be hubris to believe that applying violence on some entities labeled as ‘terrorist’ won’t prompt for any nasty feedback.

Encouraging people to trade instead of coercive imposition of Western brand of democracy would serve as better approach for peaceful settlements.

As the Murray N. Rothbard wrote (italics and strike through mine)

America was born in a revolution against Western imperialism, born as a haven of freedom against the tyrannies and despotism, the wars and intrigues of the old world. Yet we have allowed ourselves to sacrifice the American ideals of peace and freedom and anti-colonialism on the altar of a crusade to kill communists terrorist throughout the world; we have surrendered our libertarian birthright into the hands of those who yearn to restore the Golden Age of the Holy Inquisition. It is about time that we wake up and rise up to restore our heritage.

I am no American, but I believe that America’s libertarian legacy can set the right model for the world.

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

The Myth of Cheap Currencies driving Trade Deficits

For mercantilists an oft repeated claim has been that China’s cheap currency equals US trade deficit. From such premise they advocate the policy recourse of protectionism

How valid is this?

Default template

From the Economist (bold highlights mine)

“the recent relationship between China's currency and America's trade deficit with China is not what China hawks in the Senate think it is. Rather than a cheap yuan leading to a flood of Chinese imports, the yuan has actually strengthened as the deficit has widened. There are many things American companies dislike about the way business is done in China: intellectual-property theft, the impossibility of winning government contracts, baffling rules on corporate ownership and so on. However the place for fixing these things is the World Trade Organisation, not Congress. President Obama's administration has already passed on two opportunities to label China a currency manipulator, out of a well-founded fear of sparking a trade war.”

Cheap currencies and export might is a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. Having to hyperinflate their local currency in 2008, Zimbabwe should have been today the world’s premier exporter.

Next, relative currency values are just one of the many variables that affect trade. Among the other variables are specialization, proximity to markets, market niches, transaction costs, political and legal institutions, access to and quality of labor pool, taxes, and etc. etc. etc...

But for mercantilists the world can be seen only in the prism of reductio ad absurdum

Mercantilism has never about the truth, but about getting elected or or about imposing political control over others or about social signaling.

Quote of the Day: On Ron Paul’s Growing Influence

From Cato’s David Boaz, (bold emphasis mine)

In 2007 (which is when he got the most attention in the last cycle) Ron Paul warned that an economy based on debt and cheap money from the Federal Reserve was not sustainable, but the economy was booming and nobody wanted to listen. After the crash, they started listening. In 2007 he said we should replace the Federal Reserve and fiat money with the gold standard, and even some libertarians said things like, “What’s the beef with the Fed? They’ve dramatically reduced the volatility of the business cycle while achieving low, reasonably constant inflation.” Nobody’s scoffing at criticism of the Fed now. In 2007 Ron Paul criticized excessive federal spending, but with a Republican in the White House Republicans weren’t so interested. With even more excessive spending by a Democratic president, that’s become a central issue of the era. In 2007 Ron Paul criticized endless military intervention, but most Republicans were content to repeat, “The surge is working.” Now even Republicans are getting weary of war. In 2007 Ron Paul said that Congress and the president should not act outside their powers under the Constitution, but Republicans didn’t want to hear about unconstitutional acts by a Republican president. Now, after the bailouts and the health care takeover and the unauthorized war in Libya, all the Republican candidates are talking about restoring the Constitution.

It’s not that Ron Paul has moved closer to the center but rather that the center of American political discussion has moved closer to him.

Gandhi's law applies to Ron Paul (even if this might not apply to his presidential aspirations)
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win

Slovakia Rejects Euro Bailout, government falls

I would like to congratulate Slovakia’s classical liberal party the Freedom and Solidarity (SaS) party led by Richard Sulik for standing firm against the Euro bailout which not only led to the rejection, but also to the fall of Slovakia’s government too.

I earlier pointed out that Mr. Sulik’s party could become the last impediment to the EFSF

From Bloomberg, (bold emphasis added)

Slovakia’s opposition leader said lawmakers must find a way to approve Europe’s enhanced bailout fund, which was rejected yesterday amid a dispute over the future of Prime Minister Iveta Radicova.

Slovakia “must sign up to the rescue fund,” Robert Fico said late yesterday, adding that his party, which didn’t back the measure yesterday, is awaiting a proposal from the ruling coalition. Radicova said the only country in the 17 nations that use the euro that has yet to approve European Financial Stability Facility, must find a solution to approve the EFSF “as soon as possible.” No time for a new vote has been set…

A total of 55 lawmakers of the 124 present backed the motion, short of the required majority of 76 deputies. Nine were against it. The vote was destined to fail after the Freedom and Solidarity party, one of four coalition members, said it wouldn’t support the changes.

With average salaries still below those in Greece, it’s getting tougher to garner support among the poorest euro citizens for further aid to their Mediterranean partners.

As the crisis continues to engulf the euro region and threatens its lenders, German and French leaders at a meeting on Oct. 9 pledged to devise a plan to recapitalize banks, help Greece and strengthen Europe’s economic governance. German chancellor Angela Merkel, after meeting French President Nicholas Sarkozy, said Europe will do “everything necessary” to ensure that banks have enough capital.

The expanded powers of the 440 billion-euro ($600 billion) EFSF would allow the fund to buy the debt of stressed euro-area nations, aid troubled banks in the region and offer credit lines to governments. The EFSF’s current role is to sell bonds to finance rescue loans.

The Slovakia’s vote on the EFSF is still expected to be passed as the ruling party intends to tie up with other opposition bloc.

Aside, ECB officials are reportedly weighing on options to circumvent Slovakia in case she remains intransigent. In short, rules be damned, just save the bankers.

Obviously the hefty rebound by global equity markets have been based on the recently announced QEs by the ECB and the BoE, which has been mostly rationalized from ‘promises’ by major EU political leaders to secure a bailout that would ring fence the EU banking system.

The markets appear to have even written off a potential rejection, in what seems as strong confidence that the EFSF will get through with Slovakia’s vote or without Slovakia’s participation.

In my view this seems to be a tenuous premise from which to latch a bullish perspective on. This signifies as extreme faith towards government’s ability to solve social problems by inflationism and financial repression even if the supposed panacea seem lacking the scale compared to the previous measures

And as said before there is still is a China factor to consider.

I'll be in constant vigil

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Graphic: Differences and Shared Interests of Occupy Wall Street and the TEA Party

A Venn Diagram showing the differences and shared interests of the Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party movements

(hat tip Professor Steve Horwitz. Source here)

clip_image001

War on the Internet: Legalized Spying of Email?

Incumbent political institutions will continue to wage war of controls against the immensely expanding social media. The latter is being proven as a crystallizing force in politics (e.g. Arab Spring)

I have covered part of this cat and mouse engagement here, here, here and here. Now the theatre of war has expanded to include prying into personal emails.

This from Wall Street Journal (bold emphasis mine)

The U.S. government has obtained a controversial type of secret court order to force Google Inc. and small Internet provider Sonic.net Inc. to turn over information from the email accounts of WikiLeaks volunteer Jacob Appelbaum, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

Sonic said it fought the government's order and lost, and was forced to turn over information. Challenging the order was "rather expensive, but we felt it was the right thing to do," said Sonic's chief executive, Dane Jasper. The government's request included the email addresses of people Mr. Appelbaum corresponded with the past two years, but not the full emails.

Both Google and Sonic pressed for the right to inform Mr. Appelbaum of the secret court orders, according to people familiar with the investigation. Google declined to comment. Mr. Appelbaum, 28 years old, hasn't been charged with wrongdoing.

The court clashes in the WikiLeaks case provide a rare public window into the growing debate over a federal law that lets the government secretly obtain information from people's email and cellphones without a search warrant. Several court decisions have questioned whether the law, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, violates the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.

WikiLeaks is a publisher of documents that people can submit anonymously. After WikiLeaks released a trove of classified government diplomatic cables last year, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said the U.S. was pursuing an "active criminal investigation" of WikiLeaks.

Passed in 1986, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act is older than the World Wide Web, which was dreamed up in 1989. A coalition of technology companies—including Google, Microsoft Corp. and AT&T Corp.—is lobbying Congress to update the law to require search warrants in more digital investigations.

The law was designed to give the same protections to electronic communications that were already in place for phone calls and regular mail. But it didn't envision a time when cellphones transmitted locations and people stored important documents on remote services, such as Gmail, rather than on their own computers.

Law enforcement uses the law to obtain some emails, cellphone-location records and other digital documents without getting a search warrant or showing probable cause that a crime has been committed. Instead the law sets a lower bar: The government must show only "reasonable grounds" that the records would be "relevant and material" to an investigation.

As a result, it can be easier for law-enforcement officers to see a person's email information than it is to see their postal mail.

Another significant difference: A person whose email is inspected this way often never knows a search was conducted. That's because court orders under the 1986 law are almost always sealed, and the Internet provider is generally prohibited from notifying the customer whose data is searched. By contrast, search warrants are generally delivered to people whose property is being searched.

Read the rest here

Politics has never been about transparency or tolerance of political differences or of freedom of speech or of respect of privacy but has been about censorship and the suppression of political opponents or the despotic control of the flow of information. This applies not just in the US but everywhere.

Current day politics essentially represents an ongoing battle between vertical political forces, vestiges of the industrial age, against the new generation individual based or bottom-up forces whom have been enabled and empowered by the web, such as Wikileaks.

Even the current welfare-financial crisis being endured by mostly Western or developed nations have been clear symptoms of the erosion of this untenable structure.

It’s the same war that’s being wage at almost every aspects of our lives.

A war against our civil liberties. And, through the internet and through education, we are fighting back.

As Ludwig von Mises wrote,

Everything that happens in the social world in our time is the result of ideas. Good things and bad things. What is needed is to fight bad ideas. We must fight all that we dislike in public life. We must substitute better ideas for wrong ideas. We must refute the doctrines that promote union violence. We must oppose the confiscation of property, the control of prices, inflation, and all those evils from which we suffer.

Ideas and only ideas can light the darkness. These ideas must be brought to the public in such a way that they persuade people. We must convince them that these ideas are the right ideas and not the wrong ones. The great age of the nineteenth century, the great achievements of capitalism, were the result of the ideas of the classical economists, of Adam Smith and David Ricardo, of Bastiat and others.

US Regulator Call for Price Controls in Commodity Markets

More and more signs validating my suspicions of politically engineered price suppression scheme being applied by regulators in the commodity markets

From the News Tribune

Having failed earlier this year to impose congressionally mandated limits on excessive speculation in commodities markets, a key regulator on Thursday called on the Obama administration to immediately impose temporary limits on some Wall Street investments.

"We were supposed to have these done earlier this year but have failed to do so," complained Bart Chilton, one of three Democrats on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Chilton is calling for what are known as spot-month limits, which would restrict how much of trading can be done by a single trader or company in contracts for next-month delivery of crude oil, natural gas, wheat or any number of other commodities.

The influx of Wall Street money into commodities markets, some on behalf of large pension funds and other institutional investors, has resulted in financial players far outnumbering the traditional traders in these markets, where producers have sought to protect themselves from large price swings.

The flow of this Wall Street money has led to wild and volatile price swings in the price of everything from crude oil to cotton to coffee - hurting consumers and businesses.

It's also led some lawmakers, academics and market participants to conclude that the futures markets no longer work as intended. A series of reports this year by McClatchy Newspapers suggests futures prices now are often divorced from the underlying supply-and-demand fundamentals in many markets.

The real intended design has been to keep commodity prices low so that political stewards will be unconstrained to apply more policies geared towards inflationism.

In short, blame the unintended effects of the current policies as the cause of today’s woes.

As I previously pointed out, the great Ludwig von Mises has predicted this in 1945 (Planning for Freedom), as part of the inflation cycle—a feedback loop mechanism where inflationism begets price controls which leads to more inflationism

those engaged in futile and hopeless attempts to fight the inevitable consequences of inflation — the rise in prices — are masquerading their endeavors as a fight against inflation. While fighting the symptoms, they pretend to fight the root causes of the evil. And because they do not comprehend the causal relation between the increase in money in circulation and credit expansion on the one hand and the rise in prices on the other, they practically make things worse.

Regulators believe the myth that the law of demand and supply can be politically controlled or manipulated or repealed. If they succeed in imposing such policies, then these regulators would be sowing the seeds of economic perdition.

Italian Minister: Cocaine responsible for Market Volatility

From the Guardian (bold highlights mine)

First it was the hedge funds, then the ratings agencies. Now, a member of Silvio Berlusconi's government has pointed to a different reason for the world financial turmoil. The problem — or one of them — is cocaine. And to tackle it, Carlo Giovanardi, a junior minister with responsibility for the family, said he intended introducing drug tests for securities traders on the Milan Borsa. Speaking in a YouTube interview, he said the drug is one of the causes of fluctuations on the stock exchange and "an alarm that needs to be listened to". The minister said testing traders to see if they had been snorting the odd line was part of a wider project for checks on pilots, professional drivers, public officials, surgeons and police officers. "The idea of giving drug tests to people with great responsibility is absolutely acceptable," he said. "I rather doubt that an investor would entrust his or her savings to an alcoholic. And the same thing holds good for cocaine."

I don’t know about the rest, but as a 'trader', I frequent beer and has never touched or used cocaine. So I am not party to the accusation of so called cocaine driven market epileptic seizures.

Yet I don’t see any of my beer stupors as having to affect my market positions. I guess anyone exposed in the financial markets would be risking real money enough to sensibly make economic calculations as major part of their decisions or actions--even if such action would represent as miscalculations for one reason or another.

Besides, volatile markets as I have been repeating are manifestations of boom bust policies meant to preserve the current political order.

Funny how politicians are finding fault on everyone and everything else except themselves.

First, this demonstrates utter ignorance of the market process. Second, such is a symptom of desperation. And lastly, this also signifies the innate desire by politicians to use more political power to control people's actions--political greed--which is actually the source of all the volatilities

How imbecilic.

Chart of the Day: Cartelization of the US Banking System

Hat tip Karen De Coster at Lew Rockwell Blog

clip_image002

Click on the image to enlarge

This germane quote from the great Murray N. Rothbard tells us why too big to fail banks is the direction of central banking policies,

The fewer the number of competing banks in existence, the easier it will be to coordinate rates of expansion. If there are many thousands of banks, on the other hand, coordination will become very difficult and a cartel agreement is apt to break down

China Announces Bank Bailouts

My hunch about China's bursting bubble has been getting some validation.

The Chinese government has announced that it will intervene by buying shares of select banking stocks.

From the Financial Times (bold emphasis added)

The Chinese government will boost its stakes in the country’s largest banks, as it attempts to shore up slumping financial stocks and to restore investor confidence.

Central Huijin, the domestic arm of China’s sovereign wealth fund, will purchase shares in Agricultural Bank of China, Bank of China, China Construction Bank and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, the official Xinhua news agency announced on Monday. Xinhua added that the purchases by Huijin – its first such public intervention since a similar decision at the onset of the financial crisis three years ago – would “support the healthy operations and development of key state-owned financial institutions and stabilise the share prices of state-owned commercial banks”.

The announcement came too late for the Chinese stock market, which had closed at a 30-month low, but had an immediate effect on late trading in Hong Kong. ICBC’s Hong Kong-listed shares, which had been down 3 per cent, rallied to close up 1 per cent

Beijing also allowed the renminbi to record its biggest one-day gain in years on Monday. It rose 0.6 per cent against the dollar, squeezing traders who have been betting that the currency will weaken in tandem with a slowing economy.

Adding to my earlier commentary, a bust process-in China’s bubble economy or following an earlier money supply growth driven boom-is also a result of a rising yuan.

Corporate finance analyst and author Kel Kelly at the Mises.org provides an eloquent explanation

Therefore, letting its currency rise will cause a recession, since reduced money-supply and credit-growth rates are the usual initiating factors that bring on recessions (reduced rates of spending alone can cause recessions, but they are usually preceded by prior reductions in money and credit). It has been rapid increases in money and credit that have driven the current boom in China, and it will be the reduction in the growth rate of those variables that causes the bust.

The economic boom in China has consisted of rapid increases in true economic growth accompanied by — but not driven by — an increase in monetary spending. The increase in monetary spending, in turn, has been driven by wild credit growth, and has resulted in massive overinvestment in particular industries. There has been no shortage of commentaries and videos highlighting building booms, mania-type herd-mentality home buying, and the mass creation of buildings, shopping malls, and even multiple entire cities in China that stand unoccupied — all dramatic yet classic symptoms of credit bubbles.

So like the Eurozone, we see China’s government providing explicit support by jawboning or providing promises to buttress her banking sector.

However, the problem is that China’s current currency policies appear to contradict this (see chart below from Mr. Kelly).

clip_image001

The left hand does not know what the right hand is doing.

Again, we should see if such guarantees would suffice to forestall a bust or if market forces will continue to put pressure on China’s government, not only to make promises, but to forcefully act.

Very interesting times indeed.

Is Slovakia’s Classical Liberal Party the Last Stand Against the Euro Bailout?

Today the Slovakian parliament will vote to ratify on the rescue mechanism for the Eurozone.

However, there seems to be a complication—a party of libertarian-classical liberals led by Richard Sulik, leader of Slovakia’s libertarian Freedom and Solidarity (SaS) party—are opposed to its passage.

From Sunday’s Financial Times (bold emphasis)

A hardline libertarian party in one of the newest, smallest and poorest members of Europe’s single currency looks set to throw a spanner in the machinery of expanding the eurozone’s bail-out fund – seen as crucial to restoring market confidence in the bloc.

Despite pressure from across the continent, Richard Sulik, leader of Slovakia’s libertarian Freedom and Solidarity (SaS) party, repeated on Sunday that his party would reject the measure.

A last-minute meeting of the four-party ruling coalition is set for today in an effort to persuade Mr Sulik to back down and support the extension of the European financial stability facility at a crunch vote on Tuesday.

Mr Sulik made clear that his 21 MPs will reject the EFSF expansion if the other coalition parties do not agree to his proposals. Without those votes, the 77-member governing coalition has no chance of a majority in the 150-seat parliament.

Last week SaS offered to support the EFSF, but in return for a Slovakian veto on how its contribution would be spent and an outright refusal to participate in the permanent European stability mechanism, due to replace the EFSF next year….

The quiet-voiced Mr Sulik looks more like a demure bureaucrat rather than what he is – a self-made millionaire and one of the last of central Europe’s true believers in economic liberalism. Free market doctrine was hugely fashionable in the 1990s across the region, when ministers who had gained most of their experience from economic texts found themselves in power. They pursued radical solutions to eliminate the last remnants of state socialism.

We are a classical liberal party. We are defenders of the Austrian school of economics,” says Juraj Droba, an SaS MP, describing his party’s relationship with the neoliberal school.

If the Slovakian parliament fails to garner the required votes, then whatever gains that we’ve seen in the financial markets lately—mostly based around expectations of political promises—will turn out to be fleeting.

Anyway even if the rescue package gets ratified, the EFSF is no guarantee of success. Bailouts incentivizes moral hazard or reckless behavior, which is why we are seeing this continuing crisis which began to unravel in 2008.

Hopefully Slovakia’s classical liberals will remain steadfast in their quest to champion sound money policies and continue to fight against tyrannical redistributionist policies that favors the political and banking elites. (hat tip Angel Martin, David Boaz).

Monday, October 10, 2011

Global Banking Regulators to Force Banks to Hold More Liquid Assets

From the Reuters,

Global banking regulators will press ahead with the first worldwide effort to force banks to hold more liquid assets, the chairman of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision said in an interview with the Financial Times on Monday.

Stefan Ingves, who also heads the Swedish central bank, said the Basel group plans to put uniform implementation of the Basel III reforms at the top of its agenda.

The measures, which will also force banks to cut back on short-term funding, have come under scrutiny from some of the 27 member countries who say the rule changes could damage the broader economy.

The reforms, which were agreed to by the member states, will force banks to hold more top-quality capital against unexpected losses, but there are rising concerns that some countries will not stick to the agreement.

Bank capital standards will continue to put pressure on the markets as I explain here and here. More liquid assets will not stop the consequent crisis from central banking induced bubble cycles. In fact, this could worsen it.

By forcing banks to hold more liquid assets, which will likely come in the form of government debt, this compels banks to finance financially strained governments. So productive capital will be channeled to preserve the privileges of the political and the banking class at the expense of the economy, which signifies a form of financial repression.

Central bank based bank capital regulations are essentially aimed at the preservation of the unsustainable banking system-central banking-welfare-warfare state political economy.

Merkel and Sarkozy on Bank Recapitalization: Promises, Promises

Global financial markets appear buoyant anew on news of more promises of political rescue efforts

From Bloomberg, (bold highlights mine)

Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy, racing to stamp out the euro debt crisis threatening to engulf the financial system, gave themselves three weeks to devise a plan to recapitalize banks, get Greece on the right track and fix Europe’s economic governance.

“By the end of the month, we will have responded to the crisis issue and to the vision issue,” the French president said in Berlin yesterday at a joint briefing with the German chancellor before they dined at her office.

Under rising pressure to defuse turmoil that’s raged for 18 months, and facing growing concern Greece is headed to a default, Merkel said European leaders will do “everything necessary” to ensure that banks have enough capital. Sarkozy said they would deliver a plan by the Nov. 3 Group of 20 summit…

After their eighth bilateral summit in 20 months, the two leaders unveiled no new agreement on what role should be played by the bailout fund, the European Financial Stability Facility, amid reports that they differed on how to use it.

“We will recapitalize the banks,” Sarkozy said. “We’ll do it in complete agreement with our German friends because the economy needs it, to assure growth and financing.”

European banks need as much as 200 billion euros of capital, Antonio Borges, the International Monetary Fund’s European department head, said last week.

European leaders are bracing for the consequences of a Greek default. German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble told Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung that euro governments may have come up short on the scale of Greek debt writedowns when they reached the agreement in July. He cited a “great risk” that the crisis could spread further.

Eventually markets will get satiated by the many promises that have been meant to be broken

From the refrain of Naked Eyes’ Promises, Promises

You made me promises, promises

Knowing I'd believe

Promises, promises

You knew you'd never keep


Quote of the Day: Banking Stress Test

From Vern McKinley at the Freebanking.org

Another interesting issue about Dexia is that just this past summer it went through the so-called “stress tests” by the European Banking Authority. Dexia passed with flying colors with an 11% capital ratio intact, well above the 10% ratio that its regulators had hoped for. This was the procedure that 91 of Europe’s largest banks went through to see how they could withstand the stress of a downturn. Seems the stress test was not so stressful, as it just assumed that sovereign debt would not cause any problems for Dexia. So the post-crisis panacea for addressing future stress of having banking agencies worldwide demand higher capital ratios and then intervene early to avoid bailouts seems to be coming apart before it was even fully implemented.

Sunday, October 09, 2011

Global Equity Markets: Bottom or Dead Cat’s Bounce?

Fear is the foundation of most governments; but it is so sordid and brutal a passion, and renders men in whose breasts it predominates so stupid and miserable, that Americans will not be likely to approve of any political institution which is founded on it.- John Adams

It’s nice to see global equity markets bounce off newly established lows.

clip_image001

The ASEAN-4, represented by the Philippines (PCOMP-yellow), Thailand (SET-green), Indonesia (JCI-orange) and Malaysia (FBMKLSE-red), once again demonstrating tight correlations of price actions even on a near term or 3 months basis.

Bottom or Dead Cat’s Bounce?

But has the recent lows been indicative of a bottom or has last week’s actions signified a dead cat’s bounce?

First of all, last week’s highly volatile actions in the global equity markets exhibited lucid conditions of boom bust cycles as the market’s principal drivers

This has been especially evident last Tuesday.

As US equity markets encroached on the bear market threshold of 20%, the announcement of the bailout of Belgium’s biggest bank Dexia SA by French and Belgian governments seemed to have spurred a dramatic 4% upside swing on the final hour of trading session where US major equity benchmarks closed significantly higher[1].

This signifies as the second bailout of Dexia SA.

At the height of the maelstrom in 2008, Dexia was the first among the many European banks to fall and subsequently became one of the major borrowers from the US Federal Reserve[2].

The possible implication of this is that the US central bank could be part of the consortium that determines how the bailout will be conducted.

Although current reports say that Drexia would be split into two banks, where one of the banks will hold troubled assets or serve as a ‘bad bank’[3]; there has been no mention of any participation of the US Federal Reserve yet. So this would signify as speculation on my part.

Like Greece, this serves as another example which reveals how bailout policies:

-usually don’t work,

-signify as inefficient approach in rectifying an imbalance,

-account as short term patches that only defers the problem,

-and function like a black hole where scarce economic resources are not only diverted, but drains on the productive sectors which ultimately enfeebles the overall system

clip_image003

Additionally, while credit margins for commodity markets have been serially squeezed, the CME Group, the biggest futures exchange, recently went to the opposite direction for financial securities, where the CME eased credit margins a whopping 33%[4].

This serves as another evidence where indirect market manipulation by policymakers has been biased towards bolstering the financial sector at the expense of the commodity markets.

The S&P 500 closed the week up by 2.12% while the Dow Jones Industrials and the Nasdaq were higher 1.74% and 2.65% respectively.

Technically speaking, the S&P remains below the 50-day and 200-day moving averages which points to the likelihood of a temporary bounce, until proven otherwise.

Yet the rest of the week has been distinguished by an environment directed towards more bailouts.

The Bank of England (BoE) reactivated her version of Quantitave Easing (QE) 2.0[5], whom will be expanding bond purchases to 275 billion pounds ($421 billion) from 200 billion over the next four months.

The BoE, through governor Mervyn King, has preempted European governments. Mr King claimed that this action has been made because they have lost faith in European governments’ ability to resolve the region’s debt crisis[6].

However, in doing so, Mr. King utilized fear anew to justify such interventions.

To quote BoE governor Mervyn King[7]

This is the most serious financial crisis we’ve seen, at least since the 1930s, if not ever. We’re having to deal with very unusual circumstances, but to act calmly to this and to do the right thing

This essentially validates my theory that markets today are increasingly being massaged, not only through direct policies, but through communications management, or technically known as signaling channel[8], in order for the public to politically accommodate on such interventions.

Fear has served as an ever convenient tool to impose political controls over society.

And just hours after the BoE’s move, the European Central Bank (ECB) announced that they will be expanding her coverage of QE or asset purchasing program, by including ‘covered bonds’ or pooled securities backed by mortgages and public sector loans.[9] The ECB will buy 40 billion euros or $53 billion next month.

In addition, the ECB will give banks unlimited access to cash through January 2013 or loans in the duration of 12 and 13-months[10].

Also, speculations had been rife that ‘policy makers are working on plans to boost bank capital’.

clip_image005

European stocks have rallied off from a 2 week low as represented the STOX 50[11] or a blue chip index which covers 50 stocks from 12 Eurozone countries.

All these developments reveal of how global equities has been artificially buttressed by serial bailouts and policies of inflationism.

Also, interventionism, meant to prevent markets from reflecting the real values of financial securities, has massively skewed the pricing process that has led to severe volatility or sharp fluctuations.

Moreover, as further manifestation of distorted markets, price actions of so called risk assets have become tightly correlated when strains to the financial system emerges.

Finally price trends or the fate of asset prices are most likely to be determined by the prospective actions of policymakers. This makes governments the ultimate practitioners of insider trading—where governments manipulate markets to benefit certain segments of society.

clip_image006

With almost every major central banks expanding on their balance sheets today, most notably the very aggressive Swiss National Bank (SNB), see green line from Danske Bank chart[12], I would presume the US Federal Reserve’s participation will be a matter of political timing.

Blanc De L'oeil (White of the Eye)

It is important to note that announcement and implementation of QEs does NOT imply that markets would automatically or mechanically respond favorably. QE policies will likely be size-dependent and or highly sensitive to market expectations based on the timing, scale and duration of the program.

The efficacy on the marketplace from the current programs initiated by the BoE and the ECB which seem to be less in size than the previous measures, has yet to be established. Thus, the sustainability of the recent QE-led rebound can only be arrived at when chatters of bailouts diminishes—which implies that the market has began to discount the momentary adverse impacts of the underlying crisis.

clip_image007

Also, I am in the camp that sees that the US as unlikely to succumb to an economic recession. For example the chart above shows that the US Purchasing Managers Index PMI of New Orders and Employment remain in positive non-recession territories in spite of the recent slowdown[13]. And as I have been pointing out money supply growth in the US has been growing at a substantial pace[14] which poses as unlikely indicators of a looming recession.

But my stance would be conditional based on factors that may turn out to be shocks, such as further deterioration in the Eurozone or a China bubble meltdown.

In addition, I harbor a deep suspicion that markets are presently being used as fulcrum by politicians to secure their preferred political actions. This can be exemplified by BoE’s Mervyn King recent scare tactics, where such jawboning risks becoming a self-fulfilling prophesy.

And I would think that the US Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke may probably be discreetly wishing for more of market stress that would clear the way for him to impose his signature creed contribution to modern central banking—the modified helicopter option or the QE version 3.0.

It is important to note that US Banking and finance stocks appear to be highly dependent on Bernanke’s QE where the latter’s absence has led to declining share prices[15]. So aside from lethargic property markets, falling equity prices may affect the banking sector’s capital adequacy ratios that would prompt for further asset liquidations.

In addition, the interconnectedness of global banking system and the considerable exposure of US banks to crisis affected Eurozone banks leaves US banks highly vulnerable to a contagion[16].

These reasons would have been enough impetus for Mr. Bernanke to resort to QE 3.0. However, Mr. Bernanke appears to be have been inhibited by the recent political impasse with other political agents where his failure to incorporate QE 3.0 during the last FOMC meeting triggered a convulsion in the global financial markets[17]

This turns out to be one instance where supposed transparency of government policies meant to stabilize the markets morphed into an expectations failure because of politics. In short, like typical politicians, promises are meant to be broken.

Furthermore, resonant calls of greater odds of recession by his private sector allies could be part of this campaign to inculcate ‘fear’ in order to warrant political intervention through inflationism.

clip_image009

And I would add that the price action of gold has been indicative of the current state of limbo.

Despite the newly announced QEs, gold prices continues to fumble along which appears to deviate from the actions of the equity markets. Such variance puts emphasis on the aura of heightened uncertainty.

As for my position in the local equity markets, as stated last week

I would need to see the blanc de l'oeil or the French idiom for seeing ‘the white of their eyes’ before taking my shots.


[1] See Reported Bailout of Belgium’s Dexia Spurs a fantastic US Equity Market Comeback, October 5, 2011

[2] Telegraph.co.uk Belgian bank Dexia was biggest borrower from Federal Reserve discount window, March 31, 2011

[3] Bloomberg.com Dexia Board Meets as France, Belgium Tussle, October 8, 2011

[4] Zerohedge.com Soaring Financial Vol Leads CME To Announce A 33% Margin...Cut, October 4, 2011

[5] See Bank of England Activates QE 2.0, October 6 2011

[6] Bloomberg.com BOE Loses Faith in Europe, Announces Stimulus, October 7, 2011

[7] Telegraph.co.uk World facing worst financial crisis in history, Bank of England Governor says, October 9, 2011

[8] See War on Precious Metals: The Rationalization Process For QE 3.0, May 7, 2011

[9] See European Central Bank expands QE to include Covered Bonds October 6, 2011

[10] Bloomberg.com ECB Keeps Banks Afloat as Governments Act on Greek Risk, October 7, 2011

[11] Stoxx.com EURO STOXX 50

[12] Danske Bank Japan: BoJ can afford to be on hold for now October 7, 2011

[13] Dr. Ed’s Blog US Purchasing Managers Indexes, October 6, 2011

[14] See US in a Deflationary Environment, NOT! (In Charts) September 16, 2011

[15] See The US Banking Sector’s Dependence on Bernanke’s QEs, October 5, 2011

[16] See US Banks are Exposed to the Euro Debt Crisis, October 8, 2011

[17] See Bernanke Jilts Markets on Steroids, Suffers Violent Withdrawal Symptoms, September 22, 2011