BSP Reduces Banks' Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR), Fed's 50-bps Rate Cut Sends Philippine Yield Curve into Full Inversion!

 

The short end of the UST curve is highly influenced by the Federal Reserve’s monetary policies while the long end clarifies those policies through the prism of risk/return. A steep yield curve…is one that suggests a low rate, accommodative monetary policy that is likely to work over time. This accounts for the curve’s steepness. A flat and inverted curve is the opposite. Whatever monetary policy is being conducted, the long end is interpreting that policy as well as other conditions as being highly suspect—Jeffrey P Snider 

In this issue:

BSP Reduces Banks' Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR), Fed's 50-bps Rate Cut Sends Philippine Yield Curve into Full Inversion!

I. 2024 Reserve Requirement Ratio Cuts to Designed to Plug the Banking System’s Worsening Illiquidity

II. Bank Liquidity Drain from Held to Maturity (HTM) and Growing Non-Performing Loans (NPL)

III. Philippine Yield Curve Shifts from an Inverted Belly to a Full Inversion!

IV. Was San Miguel’s September 20th Pre-Closing Dump Related to the Liquidity Strained Yield-Curve Inversion? 

BSP Reduces Banks' Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR), Fed's 50-bps Rate Cut Sends Philippine Yield Curve into Full Inversion! 

The Philippine yield curve inverts as the BSP significantly reduces the Bank RRR, while the US Fed embarks on a "Not in Crisis" 50-bps rate cut. 

The BSP has been telegraphing cuts to the banking system’s Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR) since its last reduction in June 2023. 

For instance, Philstar.com, May 18, 2024: The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) is looking at a significant reduction in the level of deposits banks are required to keep with the central bank after it starts cutting interest rates this year, its top official said. BSP Governor Eli Remolona Jr. said the Monetary Board is planning to cut the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) of universal and commercial banks by 450 basis points to five percent from the existing 9.5 percent, the highest in the region. 

Four months later. 

GMANews.com, September 18, 2024: The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) is looking to cut the reserve requirement ratio, the amount of cash a bank must hold in its reserves against deposits, “substantially” this year and reduce it further in 2025. BSP Governor Eli Remolona Jr. said on Wednesday that the cut in the reserve requirement is being considered, with the timing being discussed. He earlier said this can be reduced to 5% from the present 9.5% for big banks. 

Two days after. 

ABSCBNNews.com, September 20, 2024: The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas is reducing the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) for universal and commercial banks by 250 basis points (bps).  This RRR reduction will also apply to non-bank financial institutions with quasi-banking functions, the BSP said… The reduction shall bring the RRRs of universal and commercial banks to 7 percent; digital banks to 4 percent; thrift banks to 1 percent; and rural and cooperative banks to zero percent, the central bank said. The new ratios take effect on October 25 and shall apply to the local currency deposits and deposit substitute liabilities of banks and NBQBs. (bold mine) 

I. 2024 Reserve Requirement Ratio Cuts to Designed to Plug the Banking System’s Worsening Illiquidity 

Bank lending growth has been accelerating, while broad economic liquidity measures have been rising, so why would the BSP opt to inject more liquidity through Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR) cuts? 

The following data set may provide some answers.

Figure 1

Although lending by Universal and Commercial Banks is at a record high in nominal peso terms, the growth rate remains far below pre-pandemic levels. (Figure 1, topmost image) 

The RRR cuts from 2018 to 2020 appeared to have worked, as the loans-to-deposit ratio rose to an all-time high in February 2020 but the pandemic-induced recession eroded these gains. (Figure 1, middle graph) 

It took a combination of historic BSP policies—record rate cuts, an unprecedented Php 2.3 trillion liquidity injection, and extraordinary relief measures—to reignite the loans-to-deposits ratio. Nonetheless, it still falls short of the 2020 highs. 

A likely, though unpublished, explanation is that bank liquidity continues to decline. 

As of July, the cash and due-to-bank deposits ratio was at its lowest level since at least 2013. The BSP policies of 2020 and subsequent RRR cuts bumped up this ratio from 2020-21, but it resumed its downtrend, which has recently worsened. (Figure 1, lowest chart)

Figure 2

After a brief recovery from the RRR cuts of 2018-2020—further aided by the BSP’s historic rescue measures in 2020—the liquid assets-to-deposits ratio has started to deteriorate again. (Figure 2, topmost pane) 

Additionally, Q2 2024 total bank profit growth has receded to its second-lowest level since Q2 2021. (Figure 2, middle diagram) 

From this perspective, liquidity boost from increased bank lending, RRR cuts, and reported profit growth has been inadequate to stem the cascading trend of cash and liquid assets. 

Furthermore, despite subsidies, relief measures, and a slowing CPI, Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) and distressed assets appear to have bottomed out in the current cycle. (Figure 3, lowest visual) 

Increasing NPLs in the face of a slowing CPI is indicative of demand. Refinancing has taken a greater role in the latest bank credit expansion. 

To wit, rising NPLs contribute significantly to the ongoing drain on the banking system’s liquidity. 

II. Bank Liquidity Drain from Held to Maturity (HTM) and Growing Non-Performing Loans (NPL)

Figure 3

A primary source of the downtrend in the cash-to-deposits ratio has been the banking system's Held-to-Maturity (HTM) securities. (Figure 3 upper image)

Once again, the BSP has acknowledged this. 

Banks face marked-to-market (MtM) losses from rising interest rates. Higher market rates affect trading since existing holders of tradable securities are taking MtM losses as a result. While some banks have resorted to reclassifying their available-for-sale (AFS) securities into held-to-maturity (HTM), some PHP845.8 billion in AFS (as of end-March 2018) are still subject to MtM losses. Furthermore, the shift to HTM would take away market liquidity since these securities could no longer be traded prior to their maturity. [BSP, 2018] (bold mine) 

Even though rates have dropped, HTM (Held-to-Maturity) assets remain at record levels but appear to be plateauing. Falling rates in 2019-2020 barely made a dent in the elevated HTM levels at the time. 

Yet, a principal source of HTMs continues to be the bank's net claims on central government (NCoCG). (Figure 3, lower graph) 

That is, banks continue to finance a substantial portion of the government's deficit spending, which has represented an elementary and major contributor to the deterioration in bank liquidity. 

Why has the BSP been doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results? Some call this "insanity." 

If the goal is to remove distortions—however ambiguously defined—why not eliminate the RRR entirely? 

It seems the BSP is merely buying time, hoping for a magical transformation of unproductive loans into productive lending. Besides, a complete phase-out of the RRR would leave the BSP with fewer "tools," or bluntly speaking, strip them of excuses. 

Thus, they’d rather have banks continue to accumulate unproductive loans in their portfolios and gradually subsidize them with relief from RRR cuts, rate cuts, various subsidies, and later direct injections—a palliative/band-aid treatment. 

III. Philippine Yield Curve Shifts from an Inverted Belly to a Full Inversion! 

Figure 4

Rather than steepening, the Fed's "not in a crisis" panic 50-basis-point cut also helped push the Philippine Treasury yield curve from an "inverted belly" to a "full inversion" on September 20! (Figure 4, tweet)

Figure 5

While yields across the entire curve plunged over the week, T-bill yields declined by a lesser degree relative to medium- and long-term Treasuries. (Figure 5, topmost window)

As a result, yields on Philippine notes and bonds have now fallen below T-bills!

Although one day doesn’t make a trend, this current inversion is the culmination of a process that began with a steep slope, then an inverted belly, and now a full inversion since June 2024. (Figure 5, middle chart)

The spreads between the 10-year bonds and their short-term counterparts are at the lowest level since March 2019! (Figure 5, lowest graph) 

And an inverted curve could serve as a warning signal/alarm bell for the economy.

From Investopedia: 

>An inverted yield curve forms when short-term debt instruments have higher yields than long-term instruments of the same credit risk profile.

>The inverted curve reflects bond investors’ expectations for a decline in longer-term interest rates, a view typically associated with recessions.

Further, it is a sign of tight liquidity: short-term borrowing costs rise or remain elevated, leading to higher yields on short-term debt instruments compared to long-term yields.

Moreover, expectations of slowing growth or economic recessions can also lead to decreased demand for riskier assets and increased demand for safer long-term bonds.

Again, the inverted curve must have resulted from the BSP’s announcement of a sharp reduction in the RRR in October, along with the Fed’s 50-basis point rate cuts.

Bottom line: cuts in the banks’ RRR were meant to address the banking system’s liquidity challenges as manifested in the Philippine treasury markets. The Fed’s 50-bps rate cut has exacerbated these distortions.

IV. Was San Miguel’s September 20th Pre-Closing Dump Related to the Liquidity Strained Yield-Curve Inversion?

Figure 6

Finally, it is interesting to observe that following the PSEi 30's intraday push above 7,300 last Friday, September 20, foreigners sold off or "dumped" SMC’s shares by 5% during the pre-closing five-minute float, contributing to the sharp decline in SMC’s share price and diminishing gains for the PSEi 30. (Figure 6, tweet) 

While we can’t directly attribute this to the inversion of the Philippine term structure of interest rates (yield curve), SMC’s intensifying liquidity challenges—evidenced by deteriorating cash reserves relative to soaring short-term debt in Q2 2024—should eventually influence its slope. (Figure 6, lower chart) 

In sum, as a "too big to fail" institution, SMC’s difficulties will inevitably reflect on the government’s fiscal and monetary health as well as the banks and the economy. 

____

references

FINANCIAL STABILITY COORDINATION COUNCIL, 2017 FINANCIAL STABILITY REPORT, p. 24 June 2018, bsp.gov.ph

US Federal Reserve Powell’s 50 bps Rate Cut: A Case of Panic or Politics?

  

"Theorie des Geldes" did not become the playbook for policy makers. The 1920s were marked by the brave new era of the Federal Reserve system promoting inflationary credit expansion and with it permanent prosperity. The nerve of this Doubting-Thomas, perma-bear, crazy Kraut! Sadly, poor Ludwig was very nearly alone in warning of the collapse to come from this credit expansion. In mid-1929, he stubbornly turned down a lucrative job offer from the Viennese bank Kreditanstalt, much to the annoyance of his fiancée, proclaiming "A great crash is coming, and I don't want my name in any way connected with it."—Mark Spitznagel

US Federal Reserve Powell’s 50 bps Rate Cut: A Case of Panic or Politics?

Was Federal Reserve’s Jerome Powell’s 50-basis-point rate cut a data-driven economic response, or was it aimed at tilting the presidential election odds in favor of the Democrats?

The U.S. Federal Reserve began its rate-cutting cycle with a surprise 50-basis-point reduction on September 18, 2024.

Figure 1

Historically, or based on the Fed's interest rate cycle, economic recessions or financial panics have often followed the Fed's interest rate cuts, a pattern that has been consistent since the 1970s.

In the present episode, as US stocks have been rocketing to establish back-to-back milestone highs. However, this supposedly presage a "long-term bull market," rather than a temporary spike—anchored on the popular rationale for a forthcoming economic slowdown that would signify a "soft landing."

The spillover effects of the easy money regime have not been limited to the US but global in scale.

Figure 2

US officials could be sugarcoating the current economic conditions. From a labor perspective, unemployment rates inevitably rise after the rate-cutting cycle begins. (Figure 2, upper window)

According to Mises Institute's chief editor Ryan McMaken: 

if one looks closely, one will not find a case of the FOMC slashing the target interest rate by 50 basis points when the economy “is in great shape.” On the contrary, a 50 bps (or larger) cut to the target rate tends to come just a few months before recession and a rising unemployment rate. If one looks only at the unemployment rate in these cases, one could see how the economy might look decent even when the Fed starts a rate-cutting cycle. Over the last thirty years, 50-basis-point panic cuts come when the unemployment rate is barely up from recent lows. 

Uncannily, the last time the Fed initiated a series of rate cuts with a 50-basis point reduction was on September 18, 2007. 

Like today, as pointed out in a thread on x.com by analyst Sven Henrich, US stock markets raced to their all-time highs while the notion of a soft landing permeated the landscape. (Figure 2, lower tweet) 

However, a recession began in December 2007, just three months later. 

This recession was not officially recognized until well into 2008, even as the Fed denied it in February of that year.

Figure 3

The S&P 500 $SPX soared by 6% in about a month to reach a new zenith. Yet, one and a half years later, the SPX plummeted by 57%, hitting its trough in March 2009. (Figure 3, upper chart)

As a side note, mirroring trends in the U.S., the Philippine PSEi 30 rocketed by 17% in less than a month to an all-time high of 3,873.5 on October 8, 2007, before crashing by 56% just over a year later.

On the other hand, the Fed has opened the 2024 cycle with a "panic" 50-basis point rate cut even when financial conditions have been the easiest since at least September 2023, according to Goldman Sachs calculations. (Figure 3, lower graph)

This means the Fed has opened the liquidity spigot even while U.S. (and global) stocks are experiencing a record-breaking winning streak accompanied by unprecedented levels of debt!

The transmission mechanism has been expressed in different economic spheres.

Figure 4 

As Bank of America’s Savita Subramanian observed, “We believe the key difference between this easing cycle and past cycles is the profits trajectory. Historically, profits have almost always been decelerating as the Fed first cuts rates, but that’s not the case today” (Figure 4, upper chart)

Of course, loose monetary conditions tend to spill over not just into share prices but also through various economic channels, partly via profit expansion (wealth effect).

Furthermore, as Credit Bubble Bulletin’s analyst Doug Noland noted, Unrelenting growth in government debt, intermediated through “repos,” the money market fund complex, the Securities Broker/Dealers, and the Rest of World (ROW). Unprecedented speculative leverage that creates both demand for securities and liquidity for asset inflation and history’s greatest Bubble. A historic Bubble in government debt issuance that has fueled asset Bubbles and resulting massive inflation in perceived household wealth, along with ongoing elevated incomes and spending. (bold mine)

So why would the Fed cut rates when current monetary conditions are easy?

U.S. presidential contender Donald Trump believes that Powell’s rate cut was a "political move."

Last June, Mr. Trump stated that he would not reappoint Jerome Powell.

Putting pressure, days before the interest rate decision, three Democratic leaders urged the Fed to implement a 75-basis point decrease.

By boosting the markets and delaying an economic slowdown, this move could increase the odds of a Democratic victory for President Biden's anointed Kamala Harris.

Has Powell thrown his lot with the Harris-Walz ticket to secure his reappointment?

For a non-partisan observer, will Powell’s panic cut result in a "this time is different" "soft landing?"

Or, is it merely delaying an inevitable economic reckoning? 

In the end, the USD price of gold sprinted to an all-time high. (Figure 4, lowest tweet)

Is this milestone driven by a mounting #FOMO among emerging market central banks? Is it a safe-haven response to the escalating Israel-Palestine war, Israel-Hezbollah war, or a broader war theater in the Middle East? Is it also factoring in global central banks trapped in their easy money policies, which have accelerated speculative mania and intensified systemic leverage?

We are living in interesting times. 

 

Why the BSP will be Slashing its Policy Interest Rates Soon

 

Every inflation must eventually be ended by government or it must "self‑destruct"—but not until after it has done untold harm—Henry Hazlitt 

 

In this short issue 

Why the BSP will be Slashing its Policy Interest Rates Soon 

I. Led by T-Bills, Yields of Treasury Curve Crashed: "Bullish Steepener" 

II. BVAL Treasure Rates Below the BSP’s Policy Rates; The Erosion of Inflation Tax 

III. BSP’s Asymmetric Monetary Policies 

IV. BSP’s Possible Rationalizations: Expected US Fed Rate Cuts and Escalating Streak of Global Central Bank Easing 

V. BSP’s Zero Bound Policies and the PSEi 30’s Diminishing Returns 

 

Why the BSP will be Slashing its Policy Interest Rates Soon 

 

The recent crash in the yields of the Philippine treasury curve has strongly signaled the BSP’s coming rate cuts.  

 

I. Led by T-Bills, Yields of Treasury Curve Crashed: "Bullish Steepener" 

 

Will the streak of BSP rate cuts start this December or early 2024?  Why? Because these have been communicated to the public by the local treasury market.  

  

Figure 1 

 

The reliable but unheralded treasury traders—via demonstrated preference (action speaks louder than words)—have been on a Treasury panic buying spree that sent yields collapsing across the curve. (Figure 1, upper window) 

  

Treasury traders appear to be expecting a (possibly a "surprise") sharp decline in inflation. If so, a disinflationary environment entails a weaker private sector economic performance this Q4.  

  

Since its peak last November 16th, the recent tailspin of the 1-month T-bill yield hallmarked the performance of various Treasury maturities across the curve.  

 

Yet, the scale of the decline (1- and 3-month T-bills) has been substantially deeper compared to the Q2 2019 episode when the BSP began its credit easing campaign. (Figure 1, lower graph)   

 

And this may be pressing enough to force the BSP to act. 

 

Figure 2 

 

Furthermore, since yields of short-term or T-bills have plunged the most, this reshaped the slope into a "Bullish Steepener"—frequently pointing to rate cuts. 

 

Treasury curve abruptly steepened from a relatively "flat" slope last September and October. (Figure 2, upper chart) 

 

II. BVAL Treasure Rates Below the BSP’s Policy Rates; The Erosion of Inflation Tax 

 

What’s more, the across-the-curve plunge in treasury yields has resulted in a sharp tightening—BSP overnight interbank rates have become HIGHER than treasuries! (Figure 2, lower graph)  

 

Figure 3 

 

On top of this, BSP rates have been higher than the CPI and the headline GDP, reinforcing this financial "tightening" phase on an economy heavily dependent on leverage and liquidity. 

 

Crucially, higher BSP rates than the CPI—theoretically—translate to positive "real" rates, which implies that this has eroded the government's seignorage fee or the inflation tax.  

 

The BSP embarked on rate cuts when "real" rates turned positive in Q2 2019.    (Figure 3, upper graph) 

 

III. BSP’s Asymmetric Monetary Policies 

 

But, of course, monetary authorities have recently engaged in asymmetric policies.   

  

Sure enough, it has raised headline rates to multi-decade highs, which reduced credit transaction growth mainly to the supply side.  

  

But its interest rate cap on credit cards or subsidies to consumer credit has also resulted in a textbook response of fueling excess demand for consumer credit.  (Figure 3, lower chart)   

  

Such extensive build-up of leverage in the consumer's balance sheets has driven the indulgent demand for vehicles, luxury-related spending activities, and magnified property speculations. 

  

The other ramification is the transformation of bank lending operations towards consumers at the expense of industry. 

 

Other behind-the-scene operations have marked the BSP's liquidity operations.  

  

Banks and non-bank financials have been directly financing the National Government’s deficit spending via Net claims on the Central Government (NCoCG) or indirect QE—injecting liquidity into the government and the financial system.  

  

These off-kilter operations afforded the BSP to raise headline rates and paint an impression of a "sound" macro-environment. 

 

IV. BSP’s Possible Rationalizations: Expected US Fed Rate Cuts and Escalating Streak of Global Central Bank Easing 

Figure 4 

 

Aside from inflation, the BSP could rationalize its actions with the widely expected rate cuts by the US Federal Reserve in early 2024 and use the appeal to the majority—the growing streak of rate cuts by global central banks. (Figure 4, upper chart) 

 

 

Figure 5 

 

Previously, changes in the BSP policy rates have coincided with the gyrations in the yield differentials of the Philippines and the US (proxied by the 10-year).   BSP rate cuts in 2019 narrowed the spread between the 10-year Philippines and the US. (Figure 4, lower diagram) 

 

Today, since the US Fed has adopted a more hawkish stance than the dithering BSP, this broke the previous correlations—the rate spread has compressed even as the BSP held on its rates at multi-decade highs.  

 

Put this way, domestic developments determine the BSP policies.  

  

Of course, since current developments in the treasury markets have anchored our anticipation of the possible changes in the BSP's policy stance, this is also conditional on the sustainment of this unfolding trend. 

 

V. BSP’s Zero Bound Policies and the PSEi 30’s Diminishing Returns 

 

Finally, the establishment experts have been whetting the speculative impulses of the disenchanted public starved of easy money gains with the prospects of a stock market boom from "rate cuts."    

 

True, "rate cuts" have had ephemeral amplifying effects on the YoY returns from 2009-2018, but this relationship broke in 2019 (pre-pandemic).  (Figure 5, top chart) 

 

But "rate cuts" had to be bolstered with the BSP's historic Php 2 trillion liquidity injections to spur a momentary rally in 2H 2020 to 1H 2021. 

  

Worst, the BSP’s zero bound (ZIRP) policies have been associated with the PSEi 30’s diminishing monthly long-term returns. 

  

It is no coincidence that the rate cuts have fueled spikes in the CPI and contributed to the attenuation of the Philippine peso, which are all interrelated with the PSEi 30’s return. (Figure 5, lower graph) 

  

Artificial speculative booms from free-lunch monetary policies only induce capital consumption and a lower standard of living.