April 7: The Day Global Risk Assets Bottomed: A Synchronized Reversal Across Stocks, Crypto, and Commodities

 

The conventional view serves to protect us from the painful job of thinking—John Kenneth Galbraith 

April 7: The Day Global Risk Assets Bottomed: A Synchronized Reversal Across Stocks, Crypto, and Commodities 

Following the April 7-8 lows, a synchronized rally swept across US, Asian or global stocks, commodities, and Bitcoin. Forget domestic interventions—this was a liquidity-driven comeback, sparked by global catalysts and market dynamics. 

I. Introduction 

On April 7-8, 2025, global markets teetered on the edge: Hong Kong’s Hang Seng cratered 13%, U.S. stocks wobbled, copper plunged 8%, and Bitcoin hit a yearly low. Fear ruled, with the VIX spiking to 46.98. 

Then, everything reversed course and headed higher through the next few weeks. 

From Tokyo to New York, stocks soared. Gold, oil, copper, and even Bitcoin joined the party. 

What sparked this global comeback? 

It wasn’t Chinese state buying or local policies. It was a liquidity tsunami, fueled by a massive global short-covering and capital rushing back to oversold assets. 

II. The Panic and the Spark

Figure 1

Concerns over the festering trade war, all-time high uncertainties, mounting geopolitical tensions in the face of a weakening global economy, and high systemic leverage put pressure on risk assets.   

In charts, US-China bilateral tariffs soared in April.  (Figure 1)

Figure 2

The world’s government debt-to-GDP ratio remains high and is expected to rise further. (Figure 2, upper diagram) 

The IMF slashed its global GDP forecast from 3.3% to 2.8% in 2025 (Figure 2, lower image) 

Deflating prices, deleveraging, and liquidity tightening led to a risk aversion in global stocks, which culminated in April 7’s brutal selloffs. 

The Chinese yuan fell, or the US dollar-yuan USDCNY spiked, driven by China’s retaliatory tariffs. 

But late on April 7, rumors of a 90-day U.S. tariff pause (excluding China) surfaced, sparking a wild U.S. market swing (S&P 500 from -4.7% to +3.4%). 

Though denied, these rumors set the stage for April 8. 

III. April 8 Onwards: A Liquidity-Fueled Macro Short-Covering Rally 

On April 8, the selloff in some of the global markets had eased, and some had started a sharp recovery. 

Liquidity—fueled by institutional buying, short covering, and algorithmic trading—revived risk-ON sentiment.

Figure 3 

From the April 7-8 lows, the S&P Global Equity Index rebounded 11.2%, the US S&P 11.02%, and the Euro Stoxx 600 10.8% as of April 25th. (Figure 3, topmost pane) 

In Asia, China’s Shanghai Composite rallied 6.6%, while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng 50 surged 9.9%. (Figure 3, middle graph) 

Meanwhile, Southeast Asian bourses staged a massive recoil. Indonesia’s JCI surged 12.7%, Thailand’s SET 9.33%, and the Philippine PSEi 30 8.74%, over the same period. (Figure 3, lowest chart)

Figure 4

Strikingly, USD gold prices soared 12.1%, copper 20.2%, WTI crude 6.9%, and Brent crude 7.5% (Figure 4, upper window) 

The CRB Commodity Index advanced by 7.2%, while Bitcoin roared 28%. (Figure 4, lower visual) 

Risk-ON was suddenly back! 

The USDCNY spike U-turned and plunged, with China’s central bank selling dollars to slow the yuan’s fall, but this was secondary. (Figure 4, lower graph) 

I called this on my X.com post, "A macro short-covering rally." 

IV. Extreme Oversold Conditions 

Figure 5

The VIX nearly hitting 50 was a sign of extreme oversold conditions. Historically, this has proved to be a turning point. (Figure 5, upper chart) 

While past performance doesn’t guarantee future results, one thing is clear: liquidity re-emerged following oversold conditions, and the VIX metric may have been somehow validated. 

V. Why Liquidity, Not Local Policies 

Chinese state buying, PBOC intervention, and the BOJ’s yen-defense rhetoric were possibly too small to reinvigorate the world’s risk appetite. 

Yet, the rally’s timing, scale, and breadth—spanning stocks, commodities, crypto, and the yuan—points to a global liquidity flood, driven by tariff relief hopes, the Fed’s dovish narrative, and oversold conditions. 

VI. Takeaways: A Fragile Rally in a Fractured World 

Trump’s arbitrary and capricious policies (Tariffs or not) should sustain an ambiance of "regime uncertainty," which clouds economic calculation for the global economy. 

This is aside from geopolitical (e.g., latest India-Pakistan clash over Kashmir, the ongoing Israel-Palestine War, Russia-Ukraine War, US/Israel-Houthi War, frictions at South China Sea and Taiwan, et al.) and geoeconomic (US-China trade war) tensions. 

Trump’s backsliding against China has prompted Chinese media to make a mockery of his policies, which in the coming days could test his mercurial temperament. Rising markets may reanimate his belligerent trade and foreign policy stance. 

With Return on Investment (RoI) and "hurdle rates" indeterminate, investments will likely stall.  The financial world will likely chase short-term gains via the financial markets, which likely implies heightened volatility in the days to come. 

Easily, this ties to bear market rallies in stocks, which are often sharp and swift but fleeting. 

Furthermore, for a financial world increasingly dependent on central bank easy-money bailouts, mounting de-globalization dynamics, rising geopolitical and geoeconomic uncertainties, increasing risks of economic discoordination and disruptions, increasing leverage, volatile liquidity conditions, and escalating risks of stagflation will likely inhibit central banks from their traditional approach—all of which may reduce the likelihood of fuel for a financial market "blowoff." 

Lastly, aside from gold, central banks and governments have lately been amassing Treasury Bills—a sign of a stampede for liquidity. The last time they hit this high was during the Great Recession (2007-2009). They surpassed the highs during the 2020 pandemic recession. (Figure 5, lower chart) 

All told, all-time high gold prices plus the second-highest official inflows to Treasury bills are likely signs of a coming global recession or a financial crisis.

 

 

Melt-Up! Philippine Financial-Bank Index Hits a Milestone High!

 

Causa remota of any crisis is the expansion of credit and speculation while causa proxima is some incident that saps the confidence of the system and induces investors to sell commodities, stocks, real estate, bills of exchange, or promissory notes and increase their money holdings. The causa proxima may be trivial: a bankruptcy, a suicide, a flight, a revelation of fraud, a refusal of credit to some borrowers, or some change of view that leads a market participant with a large position to sell. Prices fall. Expectations are reversed. The downward price movement accelerates—Charles P. Kindelberger 

In this issue

Melt-Up! Philippine Financial-Bank Index Hits a Milestone High!

I. US Banks Powered Global Financials ETF to a Record High!

II. Melt-up! The Philippine Financial-Bank Index Carves a Fresh All-Time High!

III. Tightening, what Tightening? Finance Outperformed the PSE Since 2020, Banks Centralize Financial Resources

IV. The Paradox of Financial and Real-Estate Performance; Year-To-Date Performances of Listed Banks

V. Record Financial Index: From the Perspective of Volume and Foreign Money Flows

VI. Cross-Border Leveraged Speculation Powered the Record High of the Financial/Bank Index

VII. Bank Borrowings in a Melt-UP Phase too! Conclusion

Melt-Up! Philippine Financial-Bank Index Hits a Milestone High!

The share prices of many Philippine banks have been in a melt-up. But what’s been driving this surge?

I. US Banks Powered Global Financials ETF to a Record High!

Thanks to the extraordinary loosening of financial conditions, which has spurred booming credit and stock market activity, some of the top U.S. banks reported exceptional performance in Q3 2024 last week.

As a result, share prices of Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) and Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) soared to all-time highs.

In turn, BlackRock’s iShares Global Financials ETF, the IXG (NYSE ARCA: IXG), which has been on an uptrend since the lows of October 2020, also reached a fresh record high after surpassing its previous peak set in 2007.

The IXG's portfolio consists of 209 global equities primarily in financial services and banking, with over 55% of its holdings in US markets. This week, the IXG surged 2.25% and has generated a 26.13% return in 2024 (as of October 18).

Figure 1

Financials ranked fourth among the best-performing sectors in the S&P 500, with a 26.5% return, trailing Information Technology at 33.25%, Utilities at 29.3%, and Communications at 28.3% (as of October 18). [Figure 1, topmost table]

Despite the backdrop of supposedly high interest rates, October 2022 marked a turning point for the financial sector. This followed the Bank of England’s (BoE) intervention to rescue its troubled pension funds during the selloff of UK bonds.

The subsequent bailout of U.S. banks during the 2023 crisis further emboldened speculative activity, as central bank interventions have created what many view as a "moral hazard"—the belief that central banks will always step in to support the markets.

Expectations of easing by the Federal Reserve and other central banks have fueled the blistering rise of the IXG. The rapid pace of this ascent bears an unsettling resemblance to the 2007 episode, which preceded the Great Financial Crisis (GFC). [Figure 1, middle image]

II. Melt-up! The Philippine Financial-Bank Index Carves a Fresh All-Time High!

What does this have to do with the PSE?

The PSEi 30 closed the week ending October 18th up 1.44%, pushing 2024 Year-to-Date (YTD) returns to 14.97%.

Leading the gains this week was the Financial/Bank Index, with a 3.5% spike, followed by the Property Index, which climbed 2.11%.

The strong performance of the banking and property sectors supposedly reflects the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas' (BSP) announcement of its second round of rate cuts, effective October 17.

With this week’s surge, Financials have swiftly secured the second spot YTD with a 39.3% return, closing in on the ICT-led Service Sector, which holds the top position with 40.7%.

Since the PSEi 30 hit its June 2021 lows—mirroring trends in the U.S.—financials have sprinted ahead of other sectors. The Financial Index returned 29.9%, followed by the Property Index at 25%, both contributing to the PSEi 30’s overall 20.4% gain over this period. (Figure 1, lowest graph)

Figure 2

Here’s the thing: the Financial/Bank Index set a new record last September, surpassing its January 2018 high of 2,325.65. In a parabolic fashion, similar to global markets, the financial/bank index decisively reinforced its end-September breakout with this week’s push to 2,421.6. (Figure 2, topmost chart) 

Once again, China Bank’s incredible vertical rise is unprecedented, showcasing price volatility that is unbecoming of traditional banks. (Figure 2 middle chart) 

As previously pointed out, similar to the Lehman episode, skyrocketing prices tend to disguise underlying problems. 

In essence, the parabolic rise of financials hardly indicates a healthy bull market. If history serves as a guide (as seen in 2012 and 2018), this could be a sign of an interim top. 

Or could this time be different? 

III. Tightening, what Tightening? Finance Outperformed the PSE Since 2020, Banks Centralize Financial Resources 

The Financial/Bank Index currently consists of eight constituents: seven banks—Asia United Bank [AUB], BDO Unibank [BDO], Bank of the Philippine Islands [BPI], China Banking [CBC], Metrobank [MBT], Philippine National Bank [PNB], and Security Bank [SECB]—and one non-bank entity, the Philippine Stock Exchange [PSE].

Three of the bank members in the Financial Index are also part of the PSEi 30 composite, with two of them ranking among the top five.

While recent mainstream discussions have focused on how banks benefit from the liquidity injections via significant Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR) cuts, and BSP rate cuts, the Financial Index has been outperforming the PSEi 30 since 2020. (Figure 2, lowest diagram) 

This trend began when the BSP implemented historic measures to support the industry, including quantitative easing (QE), rate cuts, RRR cuts, and relief measures.

This indicates that current dynamics represent a continuation of an underlying trend.

Figure 3

The BSP’s Total Resources of the Financial System (TRFS) data reveals that not only is it outgrowing GDP, but the share of banking resources—particularly from universal commercial (UC) banks—has been driving most of this growth. Philippine bank and UC bank share of the TRFS accounted for 83.4% and 78.05% last August. (Figure 3, topmost window) 

This highlights a concentration of resources and a deepening dependence of the economy on bank credit and liquidity. Thus, when officials claim they are promoting capital markets, it only holds true if banks benefit from it. 

Ironically, despite previous rate hikes, the TRFS suggests there has been little actual "tightening" or "restrictiveness" in the system. 

The outperformance of the Financial/Bank Index further confirms this. Yet, even with the availability of public data, discussions surrounding these insights are often sparse. 

IV. The Paradox of Financial and Real-Estate Performance; Year-To-Date Performances of Listed Banks 

In contrast, despite the substantial rebound in the Property Index from June 21 through September, it has yet to break its pattern of underperformance relative to the PSEi 30. (Figure 3, middle graph) 

These divergent trends suggest that, regardless of the measures undertaken by the BSP, the property sector remains hindered by internal challenges. 

In fact, contrary to most predictions, low interest rates have contributed to the real estate sector's struggles. As the BSP eased monetary policy over the past decade, the sector's value-added share of GDP fell to recent all-time lows—an indication of malinvestment. (Figure 3, lowest chart)

Figure 4 

Still, the Year-to-Date (YTD) performance of all listed banks, which has averaged a return of 27.08% as of October 18, has been skewed in favor of the banks that are part of the financial/bank index. (Figure 4, topmost image) 

Rocketing stock prices of Financial Index members AUB and CBC have delivered impressive YTD returns of 91.3% and 94.59%, respectively. (Figure 4, middle visual) 

Meanwhile, PSEi 30 mainstays BDO, BPI, and MBT produced returns of 25.7%, 37.9%, and 56.5%, respectively. SECB also saw a solid return of 36.5%. 

Have CBC and AUB struck a "gold mine" that the market has only recently discovered? 

V. Record Financial Index: From the Perspective of Volume and Foreign Money Flows 

Volume and foreign money flows offer another perspective.

Although the PSEi 30 briefly surged past 7,500 before retreating, trading volume remains relatively sluggish.  (Figure 4, lowest graph) 

But that’s only part of the story. 

What remains less known to many is that despite this overall lethargy, financials and banks have captured the bulk of the trading volume or a significant portion has been concentrated in financials and banks. 

The BSP and PSE have yet to release transaction data for August and September.

Figure 5 

However, using July data, the 7-month share of financials' volume relative to total market volume reached an all-time high of 23.7% in 2023. It has since retreated to 19.1% this year, the second-highest on record. That number, however, could reach a new high in October. (Figure 5, topmost image) 

As of October 18, the financial sector's share of gross trading volume had soared to 26.5% (and its share of mainboard volume to 29.6%). 

In other words, the financial/banking sector has absorbed about a quarter of the PSE's sluggish trading volume! That’s an astonishing level of concentration risk—Incredible! 

Given my limited access to sophisticated database organizing tools, I have only managed to tabulate foreign flows using October data, which is limited to the top five Financial Index members: AUB, BDO, BPI, CBC, and SECB. 

There is no question that these top five banks dominate the turnover share, accounting for 90.7% during the week leading up to October 18 and 84.8% for the entire month of October. 

VI. Cross-Border Leveraged Speculation Powered the Record High of the Financial/Bank Index 

But here are some additional insights: 

Net foreign inflows of Php 892.5 million for the top five banks represented 20.94% of the Php 4.261 billion total foreign inflows for October.

Notably, a substantial portion of this, accounting for 87.8% or Php 953.2 million, originated from last week alone, out of a total inflow of Php 1.086 billion.

In short, the recent surge to a record high in the Financial/Bank Index was largely driven by foreign capital, likely bolstered by the "national team" (such as the treasury departments of banks, Maharlika SWF and other financial corporations or OFCs?).

Stunning.

It’s looks likely that some of the foreign money chasing the U.S.-based IXG (iShares Global Financials ETF) rally has been positioning itself in emerging market banks like those in the Philippines. 

What we are witnessing appears to be unadulterated, leveraged speculative cross-border allocations, primarily focused on banks and, to a lesser extent, communications companies (telcos). [See returns of S&P 500 sector above] 

Further, the PSEi 30’s weekly breadth was overwhelmingly positive, with 19 of the 30 issues gaining and three remaining unchanged, averaging a 1.43% increase—almost mirroring the index’s actual weekly return of 1.44%. Two stocks, Meralco and Century Pacific Food (CNPF), hit all-time highs this week. (Figure 5, middle chart)

Weekly gains in the three banks contributed significantly to the PSEi 30’s performance. These banks accounted for 22.6% of the index, while the top five heavyweights—two of which are banks—commanded over half (50.83%) of the PSEi 30 as of October 18. (Figure 5, lowest pane) 

VII. Bank Borrowings in a Melt-UP Phase too! Conclusion

Before we conclude, as we await the PSE and the BSP to release September and Q3 data on individual banks and the overall banking system, it is noteworthy that some banks, such as PBCOM and PNB, have recently announced plans to raise funds through debt issuance in the capital markets.

Figure 6

It’s not just share prices that are surging—Philippine banks are also experiencing a sharp increase in borrowing—bonds and bills soared 32.3% in August. (Figure 6, topmost and middle graphs)

Why the rush to raise funds?

The answer lies in the ongoing deterioration of liquidity within the banking system, as indicated by declining cash-to-deposit and liquid-assets-to-deposit ratios. (Figure 6, lowest chart) 

The pressing question is: How will banks continue to fund the government under these conditions? The BSP’s response: Cut their Reserve Requirements, unleash liquidity! 

To wrap up, what you see in the media or mainstream discourse often doesn’t reflect the full picture. 

 

Important Insights from the Philippine PSEi 30’s Melt-Up!

 

Investors believe in Keynesianism.  They believe that increased government spending will make us all richer.  This illusion is what is driving this stock market. Bubbles are based on illusions—Dr. Gary North 

In this issue

Important Insights from the Philippine PSEi 30’s Melt-Up!

I. Philippine PSEi 30 Returns Among the World’s Highest

II. Lessons from China’s Previous Easy Money Experiments

III. Market Concentration and Unimpressive Volume and Breadth, Rampaging Philippine Bank Shares and the Lehman-Bear Stearns Experience

IV. Retail Players Emerge

V. Why the Opposite Direction of San Miguel’s Share Prices? Conclusion

Important Insights from the Philippine PSEi 30’s Melt-Up!

What does the outperformance of the PSEi 30 likely mean?

I. Philippine PSEi 30 Returns Among the World’s Highest

The Philippines' primary equity benchmark, the PSEi 30, stretched its weekly winning streak to five with this week’s 0.53% gain.

This week’s gains pushed its year-to-date returns to 15.8% (as of October 4th).

Figure 1

Accompanied by a massive rally in the Philippine peso, the Philippines' ETF, the EPHE, joins the ranks of global top equity ETFs in terms of US dollar returns (as of October 2nd). (Figure 1, upper window)

Year to date, the PSEi 30 ranked fourth in Asia, after Pakistan, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. (Figure 1, lower image) 

With 16 of the 19 regional benchmarks up by an average of 13.13% in local currency terms, we can generalize that 2024 has been a year of the bulls. Of course, we have two more months to go.

II. Lessons from China’s Previous Easy Money Experiments

Despite recent elevated rates, the current surge in global stocks signifies a product of easy money.

Due to the massive coordinated bailout package unleashed by Chinese authorities to rescue its struggling asset markets (stocks and real estate), Chinese and Hong Kong equities skyrocketed, rising by a stunning 23.4% and 31% over the last four weeks.

However, the returns of China’s equity markets have been capped due to a week-long holiday.

Figure 2

Though many international experts have suddenly become apostates to a perceived return of China’s bull market, I recently pointed out in a tweet that... (Figure 2)

"While previous episodes of government stimulus did bolster valuations, they turned out to be short-lived, highly volatile, and resulted in diminishing returns for #SSE levels. The 2016 & 2020 support had little impact on its bear market. Will history rhyme?"

Or whatever boom that took place before tended to morph into a bust. Even worse, the subsequent stimulus produced diminishing returns with the lower levels of the Shanghai Composite Index (SSE).

In other words, monetary inflation or stimulus from credit expansion must be applied at a much larger scale than before to magnify the effects of a boom. 

As the great Dean of Austrian economics, Murray Rothbard, once warned 

Like the repeated doping of a horse, the boom is kept on its way and ahead of its inevitable comeuppance by repeated and accelerating doses of the stimulant of bank credit. It is only when bank credit expansion must finally stop or sharply slow down, either because the banks are getting shaky or because the public is getting restive at the continuing inflation, that retribution finally catches up with the boom. (Rothbard, 2015)

China’s experience has somewhat resonated with the Philippines.

Figure 3

It took a combination of historic rate cuts, massive reductions in reserve requirements, unprecedented relief measures, and direct injections by the BSP into the banking system via the expansion of its balance sheet to rescue the Philippine PSEi 30 in 2020. (Figure 3, upper image) 

The PSEi 30 peaked in 2022 along with the cresting of the BSP's assets. 

It is also not a coincidence that the PSEi has wilted in the face of the slow-motion erosion of the BSP’s balance sheet, which was eventually reversed in 2023. 

The BSP’s U-turn put a floor under the PSEi 30 and rebooted the current rally. 

One can probably thank Other Financial Institutions (OFCs) for representing part of the National Team supporting the PSEi 30. 

The BSP has been rebuilding its asset base, this time from external borrowings by the National Government and the banking system. 

III. Market Concentration and Unimpressive Volume and Breadth, Rampaging Philippine Bank Shares and the Lehman-Bear Stearns Experience 

Of course, the difference between the bull market of 2009-2013 and today is that the PSEi 30 run has barely been supported by volume and breadth. 

Main board volume remains substantially below the level reached at even lower PSEi 30 levels in 2022. (Figure 3, lower graph) 

Because of this obsession with pumping the index to portray a bull market, the "national team" has concentrated its aggressive stock-pumping activities on the top heavyweights. 

As a result, the market capitalization share of the top five companies reached 51.1% last October 4, following a record 51.92% last April.

Figure 4

Furthermore, because RRR cuts and BSP rate cuts were sold to the public as policies that would accomplish economic nirvana, the Financial/Banking Index roared, with year-to-date returns spiking 37.7% and its index soaring to a record high! (Figure 4, upper chart) 

Astoundingly, shares of China Bank [PSE:CBC] have spiraled in ways echoing Bitcoin, GameStop [NYSE:GME], and Nvidia [Nasdaq:NVDA]! (Figure 4, lower pane)

CBC posted 91.3% year-to-date returns, with much of that accomplished in the last four weeks!

Figure 5

If history tells us anything, bank share prices going berserk could mean anything other than economic or financial prosperity. The experiences of Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns provide examples: their share prices sprinted to an all-time high before collapsing, heralding the Great Financial Crisis (2007-2008). (Figure 5, topmost chart)

To be clear, we aren’t suggesting that CBC and other record-setting bank shares, such as BPI, are a simulacrum of Lehman; rather, we are pointing to the distortive behavior of speculative derbies that may hide impending problems in the sector. 

Of course, foreign buying did provide support to the national team. For the first time since 2019, the PSE posted net inflows of Php 108 million in the first nine months of 2024. (Figure 5, middle graph)

Meanwhile, in the PSE, the cumulative market share of the PSEi 30’s best-performing ICT and the three PSEi 30 banks has reached 32.73%, which is closing in on August's record of 33.14%.  

IV. Retail Players Emerge 

However, signs indicate that the retail segment appears to be jumping on board the developing mania, which has been marketed as another version of the "return of the bull market." 

Though still negative, 2024’s nine-month breadth has had the best showing since 2017. (Figure 5, lowest image)

Figure 6

Furthermore, the declining share of the top 10 brokers relative to the MBV could be another contributing factor. It was 60.4% in the week of October 4th, down from a recent high of over 65%. (Figure 6 upper visual) 

Major brokers could utilize 'done-through' trades or outsource trades with partner brokers to conceal or dilute this number.

Despite the paucity of volume, the trading share of the top 20 most-traded issues has dropped to about 80% for the fourth consecutive week from the previous range of 84-86%. (Figure 6, lower diagram)

Figure 7

Since the low on June 21st, the returns of the top 10 heavyweights delivered the bulk of the gains for the PSEi 30. While 23 issues closed higher, 2 remained unchanged, and 5 declined. The average return of the top 5 was 26.84%, while the average return for the top 10 was 26.4% (Figure 7, topmost graph) 

Breadth was largely incongruent with this week’s 0.53% returns, 83% of which were attributable to Friday’s pre-closing pump. Although 18 of the composite PSEi 30 issues closed down, the upside volatility allowed for a positive weekly return of 0.21% (Figure 7, middle image) 

V. Why the Opposite Direction of San Miguel’s Share Prices? Conclusion 

Finally, SMC share prices continue to move diametrically opposite to the sizzling hot PSEi 30. (Figure 7, lowest graph) 

What gives? Will SMC’s debt breach the Php 1.5 trillion barrier in Q3?   

Have SMC’s larger shareholders been pricing in developing liquidity concerns? If so, why are bank shares skyrocketing, when some of them are SMC’s biggest creditors? 

Bottom line: The levels reached by the PSEi 30 and its outsized returns attained over a few months barely support general market activities, which remain heavily concentrated on the actions of the national team and volatile foreign fund flows. 

Instead, the present melt-up represents an onrush of speculative fervor driven by the BSP’s stealth liquidity easing measures, even before their rate cut. Moreover, real economic activities hardly support this melt-up.

___

reference 

Murray N. Rothbard, Why the Recurring Economic Crises?, August 27, 2015, Mises.org

 

Unveiling the Reality Behind the Philippine PSEi 30’s 7,000: Market Concentration, Divergence, Manipulations, and the Overton Window

What's been lost in this frenzied competition for eyeballs and "likes" is the distinction between opinion and journalism. The post-truth cliche is that there is no distinction, that everything is mere opinion and spin, but this is not true: journalism is different from opinion and spin—Charles Hugh Smith 

In this issue

Unveiling the Reality Behind the Philippine PSEi 30’s 7,000: Market Concentration, Divergence, Manipulations, and the Overton Window

I. The PSEi 30 Closes Above 7,000: Is This a "Historic Moment?"

II. Foreign Inflows Targeted at Biggest Market Cap Issues, Historically Chasing Tops

III. PSEi 30 7,000: Primarily an ICTSI Show; Diverging PSEi 30 and Market Breadth

IV. PSEi 30 Rose to 7,000 on Depressed and Concentrated Volume

V. Why Ignore the Impact of the Flagrant Manipulations of the PSEi 30?

VI. The Unannounced "Historic Moments" 

Unveiling the Reality Behind the Philippine PSEi 30’s 7,000: Market Concentration, Divergence, Manipulations, and the Overton Window 

I. The PSEi 30 Closes Above 7,000: Is This a "Historic Moment?" 

Along with the region's sanguine performance, the Philippine PSEi 30 broke past 7,000. Could this signify the start of a bull market, as the media and consensus have suggested?

Figure 1

Businessworld, September 13: The PSEi achieved a significant milestone, closing above 7,000 for the first time in over 19 months. Strong foreign buying and expectations of a US Federal Reserve rate cut contributed to this historic moment. (Figure 1, upper picture) 

Historic. Moment. 

Sure, the PSEi 30 has traded above 7,000 for the last five days and closed above this threshold in the last two. However, how is reaching a 19-month high equivalent to a "historic moment?" 

Media is said to reflect the prevailing mood or express the public’s level of confidence. That’s according to the practitioners of ‘Socionomics.’ 

Could this headline be indicative of the market’s mood? 

Let’s examine public sentiment by analyzing the market internals. 

II. Foreign Inflows Targeted at Biggest Market Cap Issues, Historically Chasing Tops 

Foreign buying was certainly a factor. 

This week, aggregate net foreign inflows amounted to Php 2.7 billion, marking the fifth consecutive week of net buying and the second-largest inflow during this period. (Figure 1, lower diagram) 

However, foreign inflows accounted for only 41.44% of the average weekly turnover, the lowest in five weeks. 

This suggests that local investors have begun to dominate the transactions on the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE). 

Additionally, the scale of weekly foreign investment was far from record-breaking.

As a side note, in today’s digitally connected, "globalization-financialization" world, foreign inflows could also include funds from offshore subsidiaries or affiliates of local firms.

Figure 2

Sure, expectations of the US Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts have not only fueled a strong rebound in ASEAN currencies but have also energized speculative melt-up dynamics in the region's equity markets, driven by foreign players. 

ASEAN currencies outperformed the global market from July 10 (following the US CPI release) through September 11. (Figure 2, topmost table) 

Yahoo Finance/Bloomberg, September 12: Southeast Asian equities have cemented their position as a favorite play of money managers positioning for the Federal Reserve’s policy pivot. Four of the five best-performing Asian equity benchmarks this month are from the region, with Thailand leading the pack. The buying frenzy has put foreign inflows on track for a fifth consecutive week while the MSCI Asean Index is now trading near its highest level since April 2022. [bold added] (Figure 2, lowest chart) 

Moreover, the yield-chasing phenomenon has spilled over into the worst-performing equities, or the laggards of the region. 

Yahoo Finance/Bloomberg, September 12: After being sidelined by investors for much of this year, some smaller equity markets are suddenly winning favor. The trend is particularly evident in Asia, where Thailand, Singapore and New Zealand rank as the top performers in September. Their benchmarks have risen at least 3% each so far, even as MSCI Inc.’s gauge of global stocks has fallen about 1% following a four-month winning streak. Investor focus seems to be shifting as the world’s biggest equity markets such as the US, Japan and India take a breather, and China’s slump deepens. For many of the smaller Asian markets, a limited exposure to the artificial intelligence theme means their valuations aren’t expensive, making them attractive just as the Federal Reserve’s dovish pivot helps boost their currencies and allows some central banks to embark on rate cuts. [bold added] 

The "core to the periphery" phase indicates that investors have been pursuing yields in less developed and less liquid markets, which are inherently more volatile and considered higher risk. This shift could signify a late-cycle transition. 

So yes, while there may be a semblance of increased confidence due to foreign participation, this dynamic appears to be limited to the most liquid and largest market capitalization issues—those capable of absorbing significant trading volumes.

And that’s exactly the case. Except for last week’s drop to 81%, the percentage share of the 20 most traded issues relative to the main board volume has risen in tandem with the PSEi 30 since mid-June. (Figure 2, lowest image)

That is to say, the PSEi 30’s performance was largely driven by concentrated trading volume in a select group of elite stocks.

Figure 3

Using the BSP’s portfolio flow data, July’s portfolio flows represented the largest since April 2022. (Figure 3, topmost image)

However, the larger point is that foreign money flows tend to chase the peaks of the PSEi 30.

In fact, foreign investments often surged during the culminating (exhaustion) phase of the PSEi 30’s upward momentum, a pattern observed since 2013.

Will this time be different?

It’s important to note that the BSP’s portfolio flows include foreign transactions in the fixed-income markets, but the size of these flows is relatively insignificant.

In a nutshell, the purported confidence brought about by foreign participation has been largely limited to the PSEi 30. 

III. PSEi 30 7,000: Primarily an ICTSI Show; Diverging PSEi 30 and Market Breadth

Does media sentiment resonate with the PSE’s market breadth?

In a word, hardly.

The PSEi 30 rose by 1.25%, marking its second consecutive weekly advance and its ninth increase in 12 weeks since this upside cycle began in the week ending June 28th.

This week’s rebound pushed its year-to-date returns to 8.88%.

While we have seen some substantial returns due to heightened volatility in some of the PSEi 30's underperformers, such as Converge (+10.5%), Aboitiz (+8.4%), and Bloomberry (+8.3%), it was the performance of the two largest market capitalization stocks, SM (+3.47%) and ICT (+2.75%), that drove this week’s free-float gains. (Figure 3, middle pane)

The PSEi 30’s average return was 1.03%. The difference between this figure and the index reflects distortions caused by free-float weighting.

Yet, the increasing volatility in the share prices of several PSEi 30 and non-PSEi 30 firms suggests the formation of miniature bubbles.

With a 17-13 score, decliners outnumbered gainers in the PSEi 30, indicating a divergence between market breadth and the headline index.

Despite reaching the “historic moment” of the PSEi at 7,000, market breadth continues to weaken. (Figure 3 lowest chart)

Declining issues have outpaced advancing issues for the second consecutive week, with the 69-point margin nearly double last week’s 37. Declining issues led the market in all five trading sessions.

Figure 4

Yet, the market capitalization weighting of the top five issues rose from last week’s 51.15% to 51.34%, primarily due to ICT’s increase from 10.83% to 10.99%. (Figure 4, topmost chart)

Or, 5 issues command over half the PSEi 30 price level!

This week’s pumping of the PSEi 30 pushed ICT’s share price to a record high of Php 418.6 on Thursday, September 12th. (Figure 4, middle graphs)

To put it another way, ICTSI has shouldered most of the burden in pushing the PSEi 30 to 7,000.

Additionally, ICTSI's rise has been supported by rotational bids of the largest banks, SM, SMPH, and ALI (the six largest), which is publicly shaped by media and the establishment narratives through the promotion of BSP and US FED easing as beneficial to stocks and the economy.

The public has been largely unaware of the buildup of risks associated with pumping the PSEi 30, driven by a significant concentration in trading activities and market internals

The market breadth exhibits that since only a few or a select number of issues have benefited from this liquidity-driven shindig, the invested public has likely been confused by the dismal returns of their portfolios and the cheerleading of media and the establishment.

IV. PSEi 30 Rose to 7,000 on Depressed and Concentrated Volume 

Does the market’s volume corroborate the media’s exaltation of the PSEi reaching 7,000?

Succinctly, no.

To be sure, main board volume surged by 22%, increasing from an average of Php 4.9 billion to this week’s Php 5.9 billion. (Figure 4, lowest image)

However, main board volume remains substantially lower than the levels observed when the PSEi 30 previously reached the 7,000-mark.

Figure 5

Moreover, despite a 4.2% monthly surge in August that pushed year-to-date returns (January to August) to 6.94%, the eight-month gross volume fell to its lowest level since at least 2012. (Figure 5, topmost visual)

That’s in addition to the disproportionate share weight of over 80% carried by the top 20 issues on the main board volume, as noted above.

Incredible, right?

But there’s more. 

The main board volume consists of:

-Client-order transactions

-Dealer trades (usually day trades)

-Cross-trades (trades from clients in the same broker)

-Done-through (intrabroker/broker subcontract) trades 

Last week, the top 10 brokers controlled 53.84% of the main board volume, averaging 56.75% since the end of June.

Or, concentration in trading activities has also been reflected in the concentration of broker trades.

The point is, what you see isn’t always what you get.

Main board (and gross) volume doesn’t necessarily reflect broader public participation.

The sharp decline in direct participation by the public in 2023 underscores this reality. The PSE’s active accounts comprised only 17.6% of the 1.9 million total accounts in 2023—the lowest ever. (Figure 5, middle image)

Instead, trades within the financial industry have played a significant role in the PSE’s overall turnover.

For instance, in Q1 2024, the BSP noted that claims of Other Financial Corporation (OFC) on the other sectors "grew as its investments in equity shares issued by other nonfinancial corporations," and also “claims on the depository corporations rose amid the increase in its deposits with the banks and holdings of bank-issued equity shares”

Have OFCs been a part of the national team? OFCs include bank subsidiaries, public and private insurance and pension firms, investment houses, et.al. (BSP, 2014)

Why would the PSE’s volume endure a sustained decline if there has been significant savings to support the alleged increase in public confidence?

Historic? Hyperbole. 

V. Why Ignore the Impact of the Flagrant Manipulations of the PSEi 30? 

Finally, why would everyone discount, dismiss, or ignore the brazen "pumps-and-dumps" and "pre-closing price level fixing" at the PSE?

In the last five days, managing the index level involved early ICTSI-fueled pumps, aided by frenetic rotational bids on the other top five to six market caps. (Figure 5, lowest images)

After surpassing 7,000-level intraday, the local version of the "national team" dumped their holdings—using the 5-minute pre-closing float—onto unwitting foreign and retail buyers.

Despite this, the PSEi 30 managed to close above the 7,000 level during the last two days—albeit on low volume, with negative market breadth and concentrated trading activities.

Still, does everyone believe that the mounting distortions in the prices of (titles to) capital goods will come without consequences for the financial markets and the real economy?

What happened to the army of analysts and economists? Has the fundamental law of economics escaped them?

Or does the management of the PSEi 30 levels represent part of the establishment’s manipulation of the Overton Window?

Sure, the mainstream media has been so desperate to see a "bull market" that they describe a 19-month high as a "historic moment."

However, much of today’s media reporting seems to be more than mere cheerleading: genuine journalism has been sacrificed in favor of copywriting for vested interests paraded as news. 

VI. The Unannounced "Historic Moments" 

But the so-called "Historic Moment" has manifested in many unpopular and unannounced forms.

Let us enumerate the most critical ones: 

First, systemic leverage, consisting of PUBLIC DEBT plus TOTAL bank lending, has reached Php 28.515 trillion as of July 2024, accounting for 113% of the estimated 2024 NGDP!  Public debt servicing has also reached unparalleled levels!

Second, Q2 public spending, the financial industry’s net claims on the central government (NCoCG), and the banking system’s held-to-maturity (HTM) assets have also reached all-time highs.

Third, the banking sector’s business model transformation—from production loans to consumer loans—has been unprecedented.

Fourth, the savings-investment gap has reached a significant milestone.

Fifth, PSE borrowings, led by San Miguel’s Php 1.484 trillion, have also reached historic highs.

Sixth, the money supply (M1, M2, and M3) relative to GDP remains close to its record highs in Q1 2021.

Figure 6

Seventh, the BSP’s asset base remains near the record high attained during the pandemic bailout period (as of June 2024.) (Figure 6 topmost chart)

While there are more factors to consider, have you heard any media or establishment mentions or analyses of these issues?

Don’t these factors have an impact on the "fundamentals" of the PSE or the economy?

Or are we expected to operate under a state of "blissful oblivion," or the blind belief that "this time is different?" (The four most-deadliest words in investing—John Templeton)

It not only fundamentals, the current phase of the market cycle also tells a different story than the consensus whose primary focus is on a "return to normal" phase. (Figure 6 middle and lowest graphs)

Good luck to those who believe that the PSEi 30’s 7,000 level signifies a bull market or a historic moment.

____

References

The OFCs sub-sector includes the private and public insurance companies, other financial institutions that are either affiliates or subsidiaries of the banks that are supervised by the BSP (i.e., investment houses, financing companies, credit card companies, securities dealer/broker and trust institutions), pawnshops, government financial institutions and the rest of private other financial institutions (not regulated by the BSP) that are supervised by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Jean Christine A. Armas, Other Financial Corporations Survey (OFCS): Framework, Policy Implications and Preliminary Groundwork, BSP Economic Newsletter, July-August 2014, bsp.gov.ph