Grexit Drama: Greek Government Capitulates to Germans, Gets 4 Month Bailout Extension

Last December I wrote that the populist political group which eventually took over the helm of the Greece government made empty promises which will not be fulfilled: 

The anti-bailout leftist group the Syriza which has been said to “promise everything to everyone” by reneging on deals for bailout, halting austerity, restoring social spending, continue to receive subsidies from the Eurozone, IMF and labor protection reportedly leads in the opinion polls. In short, the popular leftist group wants a bankrupt nation to revive free lunch policies and expect to get a free pass on the economy.

So in the recent “game of chicken” in terms of the negotiation for a bailout, the “chicken” appears to be the new Greek government who just folded to the Germans. 

From the Independent: (bold mine)

Germany and Greece agreed a breakthrough deal last night to extend the stricken Mediterranean country’s rescue loans package and stave off the immediate prospect of it crashing out of the eurozone.

The package was presented as a deal done by the eurozone countries together, but there has been little doubt throughout the tense and at times angry negotiations that it was Germany which pulled the strings.

Having refused to grant Greece’s request of six months’ grace on its loans and a rapid rolling back of austerity measures, Germany eventually accepted the belated compromise of a four-month extension.

That means Greece will now not run out of money next month and allows the new government in Athens space to continue negotiating with its creditors for a relaxation of the terms of its debt.

However, while the extension will get Greece through its spring loan repayments to the International Monetary Fund, it is not long enough to last through the €7bn of loans due to be repaid to the European Central Bank in July and August.

The U-Turn

In an indication of how ill-tempered the talks were between Germany’s hardline austerity proponent Wolfgang Schäuble and his opposite number from Greece, the finance minister Yanis Varoufakis, Mr Schäuble hinted that he had scored a great victory.

“The Greeks certainly will have a difficult time to explain the deal to their voters,” he declared.

Several analysts agreed that the result of the talks amounted to a humiliating defeat for Greece.

Essentially, Greece has performed a U-turn on Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras’s declaration that the previous bailout was “dead”, along with the control of the so-called Troika of the EU, IMF and ECB. Under the deal, the current bailout continues under the auspices of the same international creditor groups.

PM Alex Tsipras even wrote an op ed recently supposedly to reach out to the Germans but avowed their firm commitment to ‘end the extend and pretend logic’.

Apparently the Tsipras government has chosen “convenience” over their demagogic “principle” of overturning the current relationship between Greece and the EU as well as with the other creditors.

So essentially the sellout means current ‘extend and pretend’ arrangements will be maintained to the benefit of the status quo (the despised bankers and the oligarchs). This also means Greek voters have been left to hang out dry.

It’s a great example of the Public Choice theory—politicians act based on  self interest—or in the present case of how politicians use the populace to get into power and eventually turn their backs on them.

But it’s not over though. The German led Eurogroup-Greek deal has just been a temporary financing agreement with more negotiations to come. Perhaps this could just be an opening  act. We’ll see.

The details of the Tsipras sellout from Open Europe (hat tip Zero Hedge)[ italics mine, bold original]

What points has Greece capitulated on?

Completion of the current review – Greece has basically agreed to conclude the current bailout. Any funding is conditional on such a process:

Only approval of the conclusion of the review of the extended arrangement by the institutions in turn will allow for any disbursement of the outstanding tranche of the current EFSF programme and the transfer of the 2014 SMP profits. Both are again subject to approval by the Eurogroup.

This is a clear capitulation for Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras, who said the previous bailout was “dead” and the EU/IMF/ECB Troika is “over”.

Remaining bank recapitalisation funds – Greece wanted this money to be held by the Hellenic Financial Stabilisation Fund (HFSF) over the extension period, and possibly be open for use outside the banking sector. However, this has been denied and the bonds will return to the EFSF, although they will remain available for any bank recapitalisation needs.

Role of the IMF – The Eurogroup statement says, “We also agreed that the IMF would continue to play its role”. Again, Greece has given in on this point and the Troika continues to exist and be strongly involved in all but name.

No unilateral action – According to the statement,

The Greek authorities commit to refrain from any rollback of measures and unilateral changes to the policies and structural reforms that would negatively impact fiscal targets, economic recovery or financial stability, as assessed by the institutions.

In light of this, a large number of promises that SYRIZA made in its election campaign will now be hard to fulfil. In the press conference given by Eurogroup Chairman Jeroen Dijsselbloem and EU Economics Commissioner Pierre Moscovici, it was suggested that this pledge also applied to the measures which were announced by Tsipras in his speech to the Greek parliament earlier this week – when he announced plans to roll back some labour market reforms passed by the previous Greek government.

Four months rather than six months – Greece requested a six-month extension, but the Eurogroup only agreed to four months. This is a crucial point: it means the extension expires at the end of June. As the graph below shows, Greece faces two crucial bond repayments to the ECB in July and August which total €6.7bn. This is a very tough hard deadline. There is limited time for the longer term negotiations which will take place – provided that a final agreement on the extension is reached. It is very likely we will be back in a similar situation at the end of June.

Has Greece secured any wins?

Greece has received a couple of small fillips in the wording:

The institutions will, for the 2015 primary surplus target, take the economic circumstances in 2015 into account.

This suggests that Greece may, during this year and the extension in particular, get more fiscal leeway. As we predicted many times, this would manifest itself as a lower primary surplus target. A small victory which may provide a bit of temporary breathing space for the government. In practice, though, it was already looking difficult for Greece to meet its target this year given significant shortfalls in tax revenue.

Greece also managed to get the word “bridge” into the statement, and a specific promise to discuss a fresh programme and approach:

This extension would also bridge the time for discussions on a possible follow-up arrangement between the Eurogroup, the institutions and Greece.

What happens now?

As was stressed in the press conference, Greece will on Monday “present a first list of reform measures, based on the current arrangement”. Moving forward from this agreement, which is still largely in principle, will be conditional on these measures being judged as sufficient by the EU/IMF/ECB as a step towards completing the current bailout.

Once that is confirmed work will begin on getting the “national procedures” in place, so that all the necessary parliaments (such as Germany and Finland) have approved the extension by the end of next week.

In the not too distant future, discussions will begin on the “possible follow-up arrangement”. As we outlined in extensive detail here, there are a huge amount of differences which need to be resolved. The crucial ones being labour market and pension reforms, as well as debt relief. Chances of an agreement remain unclear, but we would expect Greece to struggle once again to get what it wants.

So record stocks have all been about anticipation of a nonevent.

Greece Bailout: The Military Industry as Beneficiaries

If you think that Greece’s bailout has been about genuine reforms, think again.

As previously explained, Greece’s bailout isn’t about freeing up resources, which had been tied to the welfare state that would have been made available to private enterprise, but rather a transference to the political protected banking system and the embattled welfare based governments.

Well it figures that the military industrial complex has a hand in this too, or will be part of the beneficiary from the political deals.

Writes the Zero Hedge,

As Greek standards of living nose-dive, loans to households and businesses shrink still further, and Troika-imposed PSI discussions continue, there is one segment of the country's infrastructure that is holding up well. In a story on Zeit Online, the details of the multi-billion Euro new arms contracts are exposed as the European reach-around would be complete with IMF (US) and Europe-provided Greek bailout cash doing a full-circle into American Apache helicopters, French frigates, and German U-Boats. As the unnamed source in the article notes: "If Greece gets paid in March the next tranche of funding (€ 80 billion is expected), there is a real opportunity to conclude new arms contracts." With the country's doctors only treating emergencies, bus drivers on strike, and a dire lack of school textbooks and the country teetering on the brink of Drachmatization, perhaps our previous concerns over military coups was not so far-fetched as after the Portuguese (another obviously stressed nation), the Greeks are the largest buyers of German war weapons. It seems debt crisis talks perhaps had more quid pro quo than many expected as Euro Fighter commitments were also discussed and Greek foreign minister Droutsas points out: "Whether we like it or not, Greece is obliged to have a strong military".

Read more here

It’s a truism that in every crisis lies opportunities.

And as shown above, politicians and their cronies wield political actions, whom leverages and exploits on the crisis exceptionally well to their advantage, by gaming the system. Yet, blames will eventually be pinned on capitalism when it's about cronyism.

And since the current policy thrust by supposed rescuers ensures that the imbalances will be maintained, the current crisis will hardly be resolved but will get extended or could likely even worsen.

Confirmation of the Phisix Breakout!

The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function. — F. Scott Fitzgerald

The landmark breakout by the Philippine composite benchmark, the Phisix, has been confirmed!

It’s certainly not just that the local benchmark has treaded on fresh nominal record highs, importantly, we should expect momentum to continue if not accelerate.

Attempting to time the markets under these conditions will likely leave market participants with opportunity losses and remorse (regret theory), as broad market actions will likely be defined by sharp upside swings.

Again this phenomenon has not been isolated to the Phisix but can be seen as a regional dynamic.

While major ASEAN equity markets crawled away from the losses at the start of the year, the high octane rebound appears have been a recent phenomenon which only commenced last June.

Ironically, these has been happening on a post QE 2.0 environment (but with QE 3.0 officially on the table[1]), and despite various global market interventions, that initially had jolted global financial markets.

The milestone performance by the domestic bellwether [Phisix: PCOMP, red-orange line] seems coy compared to the breathtaking bullish renditions by Indonesia [JCI: orange line] and Thailand [SET: green line].[chart courtesy of Bloomberg]

Malaysia [KLCI: red line], whom earlier took a temporary lead has, over the interim, deviated from the group and appears to be weakening. This divergence could be a temporary phenomenon.

Nonetheless, all four ASEAN bellwethers have posted advances on a year-to-date basis. And notably, the gains by ASEAN ex-Malaysia appear to be progressing swiftly.

Breakout Confirms the Long Term Direction

The most important message from such this monumental breakout is the apparent continuing confirmation of my long held view of the evolving boom-bust cycle of the Phisix[2].

Patterns don’t play out because of fate or destiny, as some mechanical chartists seem to suggest, instead patterns play out because of real underlying forces that drive them. People’s choices and NOT patterns ultimately determine market actions or cycles.

We should never confuse patterns or historical experience with deterministic action in the way natural science behaves.

As the great Ludwig von Mises reminded us[3], (bold emphasis mine)

The experience with which the sciences of human action have to deal is always an experience of complex phenomena. No laboratory experiments can be performed with regard to human action. We are never in a position to observe the change in one element only, all other conditions of the event remaining unchanged. Historical experience as an experience of complex phenomena does not provide us with facts in the sense in which the natural sciences employ this term to signify isolated events tested in experiments. The information conveyed by historical experience cannot be used as building material for the construction of theories and the prediction of future events. Every historical experience is open to various interpretations, and is in fact interpreted in different ways.

The Philippines experienced its first modern bubble cycle which progressed during 1985-2003, an 18 year cycle. This cycle surfaced after the Philippines had been liberated from a tyrannical rule which had suppressed the local market and the economy.

The first bubble cycle saw the Phisix advance from around 150 to around 3,100 for a whopping gain of 19x. The advance had not been linear, though. Two bear markets interspersed the advance phase. These bear markets (orange and green ellipses) were both triggered by failed coup d'états.

Yet the advances coincided with then President Cory Aquino’s administration’s US $12 billion worth of bailouts of several politically connected banks that caused the old central bank to fold from the strain[4].

A topping process developed in 1994-1997, as Japan’s busted bubble redirected a gush of Japanese capital into ASEAN economies[5]. The regional or ASEAN inflation boom eventually unraveled and became known as the Asian Crisis[6].

The ensuing 6 year bear market accounted for as the market clearing process for the region and for the Philippines, part of which had been aggravated by a global recession[7] triggered by the US dot.com bubble bust[8].

Today, the Phisix has been playing out a seminal cycle.

The 2007-2008 bear market in the Phisix had been due to exogenous factors—a contagion from the US mortgage crisis. Yet the latest bear market resembles the earlier or first coup bear market of 1987 (orange ellipse).

This week’s breakout only confirms my long time claim that the recent bear market served as normative countercyclical phase representative of any major trends.

And that’s why I’ve been repeatedly saying that the Phisix will, in the fullness of time, reach 10,000.

It’s a long term trend that seems underway even for our neighbors.

With the conspicuous breakout for the Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines (as shown by the charts from chartrus.com), only Thailand, the hub of the Asian Crisis, has yet to reach all time highs.

My crystal ball does not have the surreal or metaphysical sophistication that would allow me to predict the exactitudes, or simply stated, “I can’t say when”. I am no Madame Auring.

All I know is that for as long as the primary forces which drives the Phisix or ASEAN markets—particularly the internal or domestic monetary policies and transmission mechanism from external monetary policies—both of which signify as bubble policies, globalization (which implies further development of the capital markets of ASEAN or of most of Asia) and the global wealth transfer (West-East) or convergence dynamics—remains intact, this advance phase should continue.

In my view, it would take an endogenous or a regional bust similar to 1997, or a reversal of one of these primary factors—through the materialization any of these ‘fat tail’ events: outbreak of global protectionism or a US dollar collapse that risks global hyperinflation or a war that involves the region or a deflationary banking collapse where central banks would not intervene or the adaption of a gold standard—that risks terminating this inflationary boom cycle.

In short, patterns are hardly ever conclusive or that they don’t play out because they have or need to. Since market actions are not historically determined, the realization of patterns would be conditional to the material similarities in the feedback mechanisms or stimulus response dynamics which operated then and which operates today.

If there is a single major nexus between then and today that could influence the fulfillment of said patterns, it is the path dependent nature of governments to inflate the system designed to safeguard the banking system and to preserve the cartelized tripartite patron-client relationship of the welfare state, banking political class and central bankers. The consequences of their actions have perennially led to business (bubble) cycles.

As to whether there will be another countercyclical trend [another provisional bear market] or that the Phisix might advance unobstructed is beyond my ken. Albeit if there will be a clear and present danger that risks another major crisis, I think this could emanate from China[9], instead of the the Eurozone or the US in contrast to mainstream’s expectation.

So far while there have been signs of strains[10] in China, they have not reached a point where I would need to increase demand for cash balances for myself and for my clients.

As far as the current signals from which price trends seem to have been telling us, the upside leg of this advance phase may not only continue, but would likely strengthen.

Breakout Confirmed by the Peso and Market Internals

The Philippine Peso has conjointly broken out of their resistance levels along with Phisix. I told you so.

The tandem’s working relationship has been pretty much solid and dependable. The correlation may not be perfect since the Peso’s action has been distorted by the sporadic interventions by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) nonetheless the causation has been strong. Both have been reacting to the relative demand for the Peso assets. The Peso has been driven more by the state of capital flux[11].

Also the Peso can be seen as pursuing less inflationary policies than the US dollar, but a lot more inflationary than the Swiss franc[12].

The simultaneous breakouts can be viewed positively.

Yet the pendulum of the market internals has swung decidedly in favor of the bulls.

This historic breakout has been backed by a hefty surge in volume (weekly volume; left window) which translates to more participation by the public and the pronounced aggressiveness by the buyers.

Foreign inflows, for the week, remained substantial but constituted only about 35% of total trades. This implies positive sentiment for both local and foreign participants.

Based on the average daily traded issues (computed on a weekly basis), the public’s trading interest reached nearly 80% of the 244 issues listed. This means that third tier formerly illiquid and dormant securities have been getting some attention and liquidity. Such spillover dynamics signals broad market bullishness.

It is rare to ever see such strongly linked or convergence of signals as this.

Except for the holding sector, every sector in the Philippine Stock Exchange posted gains.

This time the financial and the property sector tailed the overheated Mining sector both of which has contributed substantially to the advances of the Phisix.

Yet given the sharp pullback by the mining sector over the past two sessions (about 6% from the 2-day high), despite the weekly reported gains, the overstretched mining sector could enter a temporary corrective-consolidation phase.

The mining sector has been up by a remarkable 15 of the last 17 weeks. This week’s advances marked the 5^th consecutive week which has elevated the sizzling hot year-to-date returns to an eye-popping 61.45% as of Friday’s close.

While the strong breakout and the bullish tailwind could mean that the Phisix could rise further, we can’t discount profit taking sessions.

And part of this phenomenon could highlight a rotation away from the mining sector and into the other laggards, perhaps to the finance[13] and the property[14] sector as the next major beneficiaries of the percolating inflation driven boom as previously discussed.

A Journey of a Thousand Miles by Single Steps

Greece received second round bailout package 159 billion euros ($229 billion) which has been larger “shock and awe” than expected by the public.

As the Danske Bank reports[15], (bold emphasis mine)

In particular, the elements of the second rescue package for Greece: EUR109bn in official funds, a EUR12.6bn debt buy-back programme, a lowering of interest rates to 3.5%, a lengthening of the maturity on future loans to Greece to a minimum of 15 years and up to 30 years with a 10 year grace period, as well as a lengthening of the maturity on existing loans.

Burden sharing with the IMF will proceed in line with standard practice (1/3 from the IMF).

The increased flexibility of the EFSF could result in more active intervention in the secondary market. The EFSF now takes on this role, which was previously played by the ECB, but will still be supported by ECB analysis.

Such announcement appears to have lifted the global equity market’s sentiment. That’s because we have another QE in place, but this time based on the Eurozone’s rescue, which has been hardly about Greece, but of the Euro (and US) banking system.

And if global equity markets continue to recover from the recent PIIGS crisis shakeout, where the direction of global equity markets may converge, then this should further intensify the bullish proclivities at the Philippine Stock Exchange or ASEAN bourses as foreign capital seek for higher returns or as safehaven on assets of currencies that have been less tainted by inflationists policies.

Under current circumstances it would be best to use pullbacks as buying windows and to refrain from “timing the markets”.

The gist of any relative outperformance portfolio gains or Alpha[16]--return in excess of the compensation for the risk borne—frequently comes from the magnitude of returns[17] and not from frequency of marginal returns which contemporary sell side analysts design their literatures for their clients or how we are traditionally taught even by academia. (I had to challenge my son’s professor on this)

Yet before we think of the Phisix at 10,000, we will need to see the local bellwether transcend the psychological threshold at 5,000, perhaps by the end of the year.

This journey of a thousand steps, to paraphrase Confucius, will be attained through a series of single steps.

Again, profit from political folly.

---

[1] See Ben Bernanke on QE 3.0: Not Now, But An Open Option, July 15, 2011

[2] See The Phisix And The Boom Bust Cycle, January 10, 2011

[3] Mises, Ludwig von Praxeology and History Chapter II. The Epistemological Problems of the Sciences of Human Action Chapter 2, Section 1 Human Action, Mises.org

[4] See Philippine Banking System: “Most Heavily Fortified Bastion of Privilege and Profit”, June 20, 2011

[5] See Capital Flows, Financial Liberalization and Bubble Cycles, July 22, 2011

[6] Wikipedia.org 1997 Asian financial crisis

[7] Wikipedia.org Early 2000s recession

[8] Wikipedia.org Dot-com bubble

[9]See Mark Twain and China’s Yuan, June 25, 2011

[10] See China’s Bubble Cycle: Shadow Financing at $1.7 Trillion June 28, 2011

[11] See I Told You So Moment: The Phisix At Milestone Highs, July 17, 2011

[12] See Is the Swiss Franc Better than Gold?, July 21, 2011

[13] See A Bullish Financial Sector Equals A Bullish Phisix? May 22, 2011

[14] See Expect a Rebound from the Lagging Philippine Property Sector, July 17, 2011

[15] Danske Bank EU summit delivers bold measures, July 22, 2011

[16] Wikipedia Alpha (investment)

[17] See Investing Guru Joel Greenblatt: Focus on the Long Term, July 9, 2011

Greece Bailout Financed by Inflationism and the Cross of Gold Speech

Hello inflationism.

The Greece bailout has gradually been revealing this option.

From the Financial Times (bold emphasis mine)

European leaders are for the first time prepared to accept that Athens should default on some of its bonds as part of a new bail-out plan for Greece that would put the country’s overall debt levels on a sustainable footing.

The new strategy, to be discussed at a Brussels meeting of eurozone finance ministers on Monday, could also include new concessions by Greece’s European lenders to reduce Athens’ debt, such as further lowering interest rates on bail-out loans and a broad-based bond buyback programme. It also marks the possible abandonment of a French-backed plan for banks to roll-over their Greek debt.

As European leaders work on the details for the Greece Bailout 2.0, financial markets are putting pressure on another member of the crisis affected PIIGS: Italy

Again from the Financial Times,

US hedge funds are placing large bets against the value of Italian government debt, directly shorting the bonds of the eurozone’s third-largest economy.

The funds have increased the size of short positions in the last month, speculating that investor concerns over the country’s ability to fund itself may spread from Europe’s periphery to Italy, according to investors in the funds briefed on the strategy.

So as the market pressure intensifies on the PIIGS, the serial bailouts will mostly be financed by inflationism. (of course part of the orchestrated interventions would imply price controls such as restriction of short sales)

As I previously noted,

So like the US, the above only reveals that the Eurozone crisis will mean that Greece and the PIIGS will experience bailouts after bailouts after bailouts. Thus, an implied currency war in the process until the unsustainable system of fiat money collapses or people awaken to the risk thereof and apply political discipline.

For now, the policy of bailouts and inflationism will continue to be the central feature of today’s global policy making process where currency values will be determined by the degree of relative inflationism applied.

This reminds me of the champion of inflationism in the US, William Bryan Jennings who made this stirring ‘Cross of Gold’ speech on July 8, 1896 or about 115 years ago.

To quote Bradley Jansen at freebanking.org,

History reminds us that Bryan campaigned not only for monetary debasement but prohibition of alcohol and the teaching of evolution (he wanted it banned in church-related as well as public schools). In fact, the chief proponent of monetary debasement was also the leading light against the teaching of evolution at the Skopes trial in 1925.

The Jennings creed of monetary debasement has been the central dictum of policymaking around the world, embodied by central banking.

Yet, with the entitlement-welfare crisis in parts of Europe, the looming debt crisis in the US and several developed economies, and with gold knocking at near record highs, William Bryan Jennings must be spinning in his grave.

Greece Crisis: Does Fiscal Austerity Mean a Deflationary Policy?

The same principle leads to the conclusion, that the encouragement of mere consumption is no benefit to commerce; for the difficulty lies in supplying the means, not in stimulating the desire of consumption; and we have seen that production alone, furnishes those means. Thus, it is the aim of good government to stimulate production, of bad government to encourage consumption.-Say, Jean-Baptiste

For some it is held the current actions by Eurozone government represent as “deflationary policies”.

Such notion has been premised from the economic ideology which sees the economy as driven by aggregate demand.

Demand side economics see spending as the ultimate driver of any economy. Where private spending has been reckoned as insufficient or inadequate, government has been prescribed to takeover the spending process or through “socialization of investment”; otherwise the lack of spending, which supposedly impairs the aggregate demand, would result to people hoarding money, an outcome which this camp morbidly dread most: deflation.

This is why this camp argues for the “euthanasia of the rentier” which is to keep interest rates at perpetually low levels (if only they can abolish interest rates!).

Also, because spending is seen as the only driver of the economy, it doesn’t matter if spending is financed by unsustainable debt loads or by money printing “parting with liquidity”[1]. For them, spending is spending period.

This is an example of what I would call as analysis blinded by the Nirvana fallacy or “the logical error of comparing actual things with unrealistic, idealized alternatives. It can also refer to the tendency to assume that there is a perfect solution to a particular problem[2]” where mathematical models based on aggregate assumptions have substituted for real life activities. Statistical aggregates assume that people think and act homogeneously.

This also serves as another example where this mainstream economic pedagogy leads to a lack of common sense and self-discipline[3] because this camp basically advocates that people should borrow and spend to prosperity even when reality says that this would be impossible (see Jean Baptiste Say quote above).

How true has deflation been the problem of the PIIGS or the crisis affected nations of peripheral Europe?

At present, NONE of the PIIGS has shown DEFLATION as an economic condition as exhibited by the charts from tradingeconomics.com.

Instead, PIIGS have shown symptoms of mild stagflation (high unemployment and high inflation).

Of the five, only Ireland encountered consumer price deflation for over a year in 2009-2010.

Others like Spain and Portugal experienced very limited bouts of deflation in 2009.

Thus, little of what the demand side economics have feared has ever been true since the 2008 Lehman crisis began to unravel.

Theoretically, fiscal austerity means transferring of non-productive resources to productive resources.

Yet because of the dependency/entitlement culture which had been inbred from too much of “socialized investment”, as in the case of Greece, Greeks have taken to the streets[4]

As Takis Michas, staff writer for the Greek national daily, Eleftherotypia in a Cato Forum accounting for the seeds of the crisis[5]

The largest part of public expenditure was directed, not to public works or infrastructure, but to the wages of public service workers and civil servants.

The grounds for the rent-seeking struggles of the future were thus firmly laid.

As resources are freed for productive use, deflation then should be seen as positive because the productive private sector should be able to use these freed resources to produce goods and services, which would fuel a genuine recovery. With more output than than the growth of supply of money this is known “growth deflation” similar to the dynamics of falling prices of mobile phones, appliances and computers.

And that’s why a major part of Greece’s crisis ‘austerity plan’ resolution has been to undertake mass privatization[6].

However theoretical isn’t actual.

The unfolding Greece crisis isn’t being resolved entirely to free resources for productive means, instead the bailouts have been intended to use these resources to protect the banking system from a collapse[7]. Resources are merely being transferred from government welfare programs to the politically privileged banking sector.

Thus, the Greece bailout has been and will continue to be financed by European Central Bank’s inflationism.

Since the end of 2009, just as the Greece Debt Crisis surfaced[8], ECB’s M3 annual growth rate continues to climb, as shown by the chart from Bloomberg[9] (upper window). Such rate of increase in the money supply has shadowed the growth rate of the Euro’s inflation (chart from trading economics.com[10]).

For as long as the ECB and EU governments will continue to finance these serial bailouts by inflationism, then we should see more inflation and not deflation.

At the end of day, false economics leads to misdiagnosis and wrong predictions/conclusions.

---

[1] what-when-how.com SOCIALIZATION OF INVESTMENT

[2] Wikipedia.org Nirvana Fallacy

[3] See Financial Success is a Function of Common Sense and Self Discipline June 23, 2011

[4] See The Anatomy of False Economics as Revealed by the Greece Crisis, June 28,2011

[5] Michas Takis , Policy Forum: A Greek Tragedy, Cato Policy Report Cato.org, July/August 2011

[6] ca.reuters.com Greek sovereignty to be massively limited: Juncker, July 3, 2011

[7] See Greece Crisis: The Lehman Moment Hobgoblin, June 19, 2011

[8] News.bbc.co.uk Greece timeline June 16, 2011

[9] Bloomberg.com ECB M3 Annual Growth Rate SA (ECMAM3YY:IND)

[10] Tradingeconomics.com Euro Area Inflation Rate

Greece Passes Austerity Measures Paving Way for Bailout

Pardon me, but this seems as another “I told you so” moment in terms of the Greece crisis.

Many have stridently been calling for a Euro collapse on this Greece vote.

I argued otherwise,

But most importantly this signifies as the implicit desire to keep the current unholy central bank-government-banking system cartel or patronage system intact.

Proof of this is that the exigency to conduct bailouts has almost been representative of the creditor nation’s banking system exposure to crisis affected economies

Any signs that would risk the survival of this tripartite global political arrangement would translate to urgent or contingent collaborative actions, despite political differences.

Faced with the risks of a Greek default, the ECB and Germany have been working on a compromise. China’s recent declaration to help shore up Eurozone bonds or the bailout of Greece has also demonstrated such tight kinship on a global scale.

The current framework of socio-political institutions has been built around such symbiosis. It’s a relationship based on financial repression.

And unknown to most, the political elites will fight to maintain this status quo despite the unpopularity on the constituency.

And apparently events has been turning out the way I saw it.

From Bloomberg,

Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou won approval for his 78 billion euro ($113 billion) package of budget cuts and asset sales aimed at meeting European aid requirements and will face a second vote on the implementation of the plan today. Data today may show European consumer prices climbed in June, fueling the prospects of an interest-rate increase next week,

This comes even as the Greek populace, accustomed to welfare entitlements, seems to be vehemently against it.

From the Financial Times,

Violent protests escalated after the governing Panhellenic Socialist Movement (Pasok) had won the vote by a clear majority. Clashes between stone-throwing protesters and riot police firing teargas spread beyond Syntagma into the city’s main shopping streets. Angry demonstrators tore bollards from the ground and used them to smash paving stones and marble facades for ammunition. Rubbish bins were upturned, their contents spewed across roads and were set on fire...

Pasok won approval for the new four-year package of tax increases and spending cuts by 155 votes to 138 with five abstentions – all by members of the Democratic Alliance, a conservative splinter group. Two deputies were absent.

Fears that as many as five deputies would defect proved unfounded as only one, Panayiotis Kouroumblis, shouted “No” when it came to the vote. He was then expelled from Pasok.

With one exception, the conservative opposition New Democracy party voted against the package after Antonis Samaras, their leader, had once again rejected appeals for consensus by Olli Rehn, the European commissioner handling the crisis, and Angela Merkel, German chancellor.

As you can see politicians will lord it over their constituency by force. It’s repression, whether applied to politics (political repression) or economics (financial repression).

This is NOT to say that the Euro crisis is over. It’s been another dilatory ‘kick the can down the road’ tactic with repercussions down the road.

I DO NOT imply that Euro can’t collapse too. All conventional currencies based on central banking fiat money system, will remain under pressure, if the bailout policies persists and becomes entrenched.

For the Euro, it’s obviously not their appointed hour yet.

The point is:

This has been how the political institutions have been established, and this will likely be the general direction of policies...until the system reaches a 'tipping point' such that economic reality will work to undermine the existence of these institutions or when common sense and self discipline prevails.

China to Assist in the Bailout of Greece

I have been saying that today’s globalization has not been limited to trade, investment and labor but also to the conduct of policies.

Recent concerns over Greece debt and entitlement Crisis has prompted China to renew her pledge of support to latest the bailout scheme still being finalized by the Eurozone as of this writing.

This report from the Reuters, [bold emphasis mine]

China's "vital" interests are at stake if Europe cannot resolve its debt crisis, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said on Friday as it voiced concern about the economic problems of its biggest trading partner.

At a media briefing ahead of Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's visit to Europe next week, Vice Foreign Minister Fu Ying made plain that China had tried to help Europe overcome its troubles by buying more European debt and encouraging bilateral trade.

"Whether the European economy can recover and whether some European economies can overcome their hardships and escape crisis, is vitally important for us," Fu said.

"China has consistently been quite concerned with the state of the European economy," she said.

Wen is due to visit Hungary, Britain and Germany late next week, just months after he visited France, Portugal and Spain and offered to help Europe overcome its debt woes.

Well China’s earlier purchases had already been substantial.

From another Reuters article [bold emphasis added]

The Asian powerhouse has been steadfast in its support for the Eurozone since the onset of the crisis. It purchased a significant amount of EUR440bn EFSF rescue facility that started auctioning bonds earlier this year. Although it is difficult to clarify how large its European debt holdings actually are since this data isn’t published by China’s Sovereign Wealth Fund, it is thought to include Greek, Portuguese and Spanish bonds.

Some observations

This adds to the pile of evidence of the tightly entwined and coordinated actions of the central bank-government-banking system global cartel.

Remember, it isn’t Greece who is being bailed out but bondholders which comprise mostly foreign banks. The global political claque appears to be closing ranks.

One positive aspect is that trade fosters such collaborative action, even if trade could have possibly been just as a guise or a subordinated priority.

This should also serve as a foreign policy guide in dealing with China especially applied to the local Spratlys dispute. Elsewhere in the world, China’s foreign policy appears tilted towards cooperation than belligerency.

Finally, the money China will utilize, from her mounting over $3 trillion forex reserves, in assisting Europe would likely come at the expense of supporting US bonds. This should put more pressure on the US Federal Reserve to redeploy QE but perhaps in another name and or another form.

China has reportedly marginally increased her bond purchases from the US last April, but statistical inflation continues to ramp up (despite 4 policy rate increases). China’s bubble cycle appears to be in the maturing stage as her property sector continues to sizzle despite her government’s actions.

Serial Bailouts For Greece (and for PIIGS)

From the Bloomberg

European Union officials will focus on preparing a new aid package for Greece that includes a “voluntary” role for investors after the EU and International Monetary Fund approved the fifth installment of Greece’s 110 billion-euro ($161 billion) bailout.

“I expect the euro group to agree to additional financing to be provided to Greece under strict conditionality,” Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker said after meeting with Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou in Luxembourg yesterday. “This conditionality will include private-sector involvement on a voluntary basis.”

Papandreou agreed to 78 billion euros in additional austerity measures and asset sales through 2015 to secure the 12 billion euro bailout payment and meet conditions for receiving an additional rescue package. He agreed to make “significant” cuts in public-sector employment and establish an agency to manage accelerated asset sales, according to a statement released in Athens yesterday. The plan is fueling popular opposition and protests across Greece...

Under the original rescue, Greece was due to sell 27 billion euros of bonds next year. EU leaders and Papandreou have acknowledged that a return to markets won’t be possible with Greece’s 10-year debt yielding 16 percent, more than twice the level at the time of the bailout. The EU is looking to close that funding gap through new loans and bondholders’ willingness to roll over Greek debt, EU officials have said.

Europe’s financial leaders needed to hammer out a revised Greek package to persuade the IMF to pay its share of the 12 billion-euro tranche originally due in June. The IMF had indicated that it would withhold its 3.3 billion-euro piece unless the EU comes up with a plan to close Greece’s funding gap for 2012. The EU-IMF statement said the full payment would be made in early July. [all bold highlights mine]

These developments seem on the way to validate my views.

Mainstream has been ignoring the political role of the EU’s existence, the role of central bankers, the intertwined complex political relationships between the banking sector, the central banks and the national governments and the inherent ability of central banks to conduct bailouts by inflating the system.

If the US had QE [Quantitative Easing] 1.0, 2.0 and most likely a 3.0...until the QE nth, despite poker bluffing statements like this [Morningstar.com]

"The trade-offs are getting--are getting less attractive at this point. Inflation has gotten higher," Bernanke said. He cited the rising inflation expectations seen then and offered "it's not clear that we can get substantial improvements in payrolls without some additional inflation risk." He went on, "If we're going to have success in creating a long-run sustainable recovery with lots of job growth, we've got to keep inflation under control."

...or that the earlier consensus view that QE 3.0 is unlikely,

central bank watchers believe there is simply no appetite within the central bank to undertake such an effort, which some in markets are already referring to as QE3.

...QE 3.0 will be coming for the above reasons as earlier discussed.

The path dependence from previous actions of regulators and political leaders and the dominant ideological underpinnings which influence their actions combined with the framework of current network of political institutions are highly suggestive of the direction of such course of actions.

Importantly, the implicit priority to support the politically privileged industries as the banking system—which functions as the main intermediary that channels private sector funds to governments. Alternatively, this means policies has been designed to sustain the status quo for politicians and their allies.

Further, it would be misplaced to put alot of emphasis on political protestations by the public as measure to predict future policies.

Political leaders have learned the lessons of Egypt and Tunisia and have been applying organized violence as seen in Libya, in Yemen or in Syria.

It won’t be different for the political leaders of the developed world. As indications of their prospective actions against popular political pressure, even several protestors on US Memorial Day have suffered from police brutality from just “dancing”

In addition, sentiment can shift swiftly.

Recent soft patches in economic data, which I think has been part of the signaling channel maneuver, which has likewise began to affect markets, appear to be reversing previous sentiments which says that the Fed has “no appetite” for QE 3.0.

Again from Morningstar

Having received the strongest indication yet of a slowing economic recovery, traders of U.S. interest rate futures on Friday backed off on the notion that the Federal Reserve will start raising its short-term federal-funds rate during the first half of next year.

Finally, for those who say they are ‘massively’ short the Euro...

...it’s gonna be alot of pain for them.

So like the US, the above only reveals that the Eurozone crisis will mean that Greece and the PIIGS will experience bailouts after bailouts after bailouts. Thus, an implied currency war in the process until the unsustainable system of fiat money collapses or people awaken to the risk thereof and apply political discipline.

For now, the policy of bailouts and inflationism will continue to be the central feature of today’s global policy making process where currency values will be determined by the degree of relative inflationism applied.