Sunday, July 16, 2017

What’s Keeping the New BSP Chief Awake at Night? Property and Credit Risks? Inequality?

Just what has been troubling the new Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Governor?

TWO weeks back, the good Governor Mr. Nestor Espenilla, warned the public to prepare for the end of the global easy money. A global tightening of money, the governor said, would have “potentially far-reaching consequences since these could undermine our economic performance and disrupt our carefully-laid plans”. I discussed this last week Newly Inaugurated BSP Chief Warns On The End of Global Easy Money (July 9, 2017)


BSP Chief on Property and Credit Risk; Ignorance As Solution to Financial Stability 

Mr. Espenilla has refocused his concerns towards domestic affairs.

In an interview with foreign media, the Governor raised the concerns of financial risks.

From CNBC (bold and underline added)

First on the property sector:

“The rapid pace of growth is sparking some concerns, but Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas' governor Nestor Espenilla said the institution is watching.

"If we're talking about the formation of asset bubbles in real estate, that's certainly an area that we have been closely tracking, drawing from lessons from other countries and from the past," said Espenilla.

"The BSP has been quite vigilant in assessing the situation and deploying measures to deal with the situation," he said, citing the set-up of a stress test to monitor the property market.

Next on inequality:

"This government is very keen to bridge the inequalities that permeate our society. You cannot really characterize a society as stable if there are a lot of deep-seated inequalities that continue and which make things fundamentally unstable," said Espenilla.

Finally, on credit inflation:

“This comes as Espenilla told Reuters last month that the central bank was watching the rapid pace of domestic credit growth closely. Bank lending in the Southeast Asian country has been rising at adouble-pace for at least two years, Reuters calculations show. Most of the loans are going to real estate, manufacturing and information and communication, added the news agency.

“Espenilla told CNBC that, rather than reacting, the agency is looking at the quality of management of the credit.

"We always look as well at the underlying underwriting beneath that credit expansion — where is credit going and for what purpose," said Espenilla.

"We cannot simply react...The credit-to-GDP ratio of the Philippines is actually relatively low compared to the rest of the region. The economy, financial systems are developing and the credit markets are just on catch-up mode and deepening," he added.

“That does not, however, justify excessive credit growth, and the central bank has a protocol to assess the risk, he added.

Many relevant issues such as relative credit-to-GDP and the deepening exposure towards interest rate sensitive industries or concentration risks, I dwelt with last week. For instance, the Credit-to-GDP statistics is an INSUFFICIENT measure of system leveraging because CREDIT PENETRATION LEVELS differ from country-to-country.

Furthermore, DECLARED use against ACTUAL use of credit can hardly be measured by statistics accurately.

And while “looking at the quality of management of the credit” would project the BSP as in firm COMMAND of the situation, perhaps to allay the public’s concerns, in front of their peers, the monetary managers admit that this hasn’t entirely been the case.

Proof?

Once again from Mr. Johnny Noe E Ravalo, head of the newly created Office of Systemic Risk Management at BSP* (bold and underline mine)

“Even in the absence of a universal definition, we think of financial instability not just in terms of the size of the problem (in currency terms) but more so in terms of the breadth of its dislocation. Thatis, instability cuts across financial segments, thus leading to a breakdown of the cash, contingent and capital markets, including its clearing and settlement functions.

The paragraph represents an EXCELLENT description of the risk of interconnectedness inherent to the financial system.

Just a reminder, these quotes are from the BSP’s official communication channel published in a conference held in Malaysia, last October 16 to 18, which was hosted by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).  The BSP was one of the global central bank panelists in a discussion from which this position paper or “Panel Remarks” had been based.

More on Corporate leverage…

“The issue is that there are too many unknowns about the rise in credit. Since the specific features of the loan agreement are unknown except to the contracting parties themselves, it will not be evident to third-party analysts how corporates are using the loan proceeds by looking simply at financial statements. For example, the rise in debt and a fall in profitability may be explained by the deliberate decision to invest into long-gestating undertakings, sacrificing short-term carrying costs for an expected longer-term increase in productivity and profitability.

Awesome! More…

“Anecdotally, we do hear of such initiatives among Philippine corporates. This is so in light of the prolonged period of Philippine growth, favourable demographics and bright economic prospects. In our private discussions with various corporate executives, we also note their active management of debt, taking on a preference for fixed-rate local currency obligations while remaining open to foreign currency obligations when they see strategic value in line with their operations. On the face of it then,higher corporate debt may just be a response to an expanding economy. The debt levels must be monitored but they are neither automatically a financial stability concern nor are vulnerabilities necessarily imminent. Admittedly, there is opaqueness because the balance between benefits and costs will be unknown unless the loan terms are made public. That said, some precautionary interventions may already be warranted

On household leverage…

“Certainly, household finance is inherently difficult to monitor. Countries such as the Philippines do not have direct data on household finance except for infrequent surveys that do not track the same families over time. The informal financial market is likewise an important facet in emerging market economies – as a venue for funding and in the context of financial inclusion – and this is inherently difficult to capture in quantitative studies. Furthermore, demographic data confirm that there isgreat variability across Philippine families, so that the very concept of a “household” is not going to be consistent across geographical locations and across socio-economic classifications.

Just how can factors with “too many unknowns”, which have been “difficult to monitor” and fraught with individual distinctions which serve as statistical challenges that are “inherently difficult to capture in quantitative studies” be assumed, generalized or concluded as “neither a financial stability concern nor are vulnerabilities necessarily imminent”???

And if the financial system relationships (causal, epiphenomenal and feedback loops) are endemically complex for the authorities to understand, qualify and quantify in their econometric models, then just how will the system’s “quality of management of the credit” be ascertained or established??? As such, what would be the basis for stabilization policies in response to volatility from such imbalances???

Let us see: Despite the HUGE UNKNOWNs, PAST performance EQUALS FUTURE Outcome. Nice.

Hardly any of these inconsistencies are assuring which leaves blind faith on the authorities’ capability to address the conditions, which ironically, they hardly have a handle on.

Yet, there is something I am certain of: Ignorance CAN HARDLY function as a SOURCE of financial stability.

*Mr. Johnny Noe E Ravalo, Head of the newly created Office of Systemic Risk Management at BSP Credit build-up and financial stability issues: do we know enough to calibrate appropriate intervention? March 2017 p.177, Bank for International Settlements

Trickle-Down Policies ARE the Source of INEQUALITY

The BSP chief raises another crucial politically sensitive issue: INEQUALITY. Curiously, such should not be something ALIEN to him. His predecessor or his former superior, in fact, preached trickle-down ‘economic’ policies!

Examples:

“How do we enable a greater trickle-down effect so that opportunities and benefits of a healthy and growing economy are cascaded to the grassroots?” - Amando M. Tetangco, Jr. Tapping into our strengths - opportunities, threats and challenges for 2016 and beyond in the Philippines and Asia March 18, 2016, BIS.org

“While the trickle-down approach to spread the benefits of development is good, it is not enough; we want to be more proactive” - Amando M. Tetangco, Jr. Acting Together for Financial Inclusion May 20, 2015, BSP.gov.ph

What’s the trickle-down effect? Hasn’t it been to enhance the assets of the wealthy in the hope that these would spur spending that would trickle-down and spread to the general economy or the population???

Wouldn’t such monetary policies serve as the ROOT cause of INEQUALITY? Inflate prices real estate, stocks and bonds and hope that this would only have POSITIVE effects. Yet, the policy of inflationism signifies the redistribution of wealth to those with assets from those without.

The establishment’s most revered economic high priest forewarned of this: [PBS.com Excerpts from The Economic Consequences of the Peace by John Maynard Keynes, 1919. pp. 235-248.]

“Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actuallyenriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security but [also] at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth.

“Those to whom the system brings windfalls, beyond their deserts and even beyond their expectations or desires, become "profiteers," who are the object of the hatred of the bourgeoisie, whom the inflationism has impoverished, not less than of the proletariat. As theinflation proceeds and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month,all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process ofwealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery.

“Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose

Be reminded that the PROCESS of inflation here is directed NOT at the CPI or any government constructs of real economy prices but at MONETARY INFLATION or “the debauchment of the currency” via government debt monetization and credit inflation.

If the BSP is truly concerned about inequality, then subsidies to the government and to the elites MUST go.

But this scenario would hardly be realized. Just who will fund such audacious build build build infrastructure programs???

Has Moodys Triggered the BSP Chief’s Reactions?

So what exactly has prompted the BSP’s chief’s alarm? Has this been in reaction to Moody’s charge that the Philippines economy has emitted signs of “risk of overheating” which the Department of Finance officials vehemently denied?

I have a different view of overheating, which is apart from the mainstream’s perspective that rising prices have been brought about by “material capacity constraints”.

My view of overheating stems from money supply growth. Based on 10 consecutive months of 30%+++ M3 growth in the 2H of 2013 until the 1H of 2014, the bubble segments of the Philippine economy (shopping malls, real estate and hotels) reached their “material capacity constraints” during this period. This period marked their “peak capacity”.  From here, OVERCAPACITY followed.

It is not necessarily TRUE that “overheating” or upward price pressures emerge as an outcome of “material capacity constraints”. Price surges can occur DESPITE overcapacity because of monetary disorder. In spite ofnumerous GHOST cities, China’s property market continues to sizzle (as of June). Authorities continue to dish out alarming amounts of credit through mainly state owned banks in order to prevent an all-out credit collapse.
 
1H Total Social Financing surged 14% y-o-y to a staggering US $1.65 TRILLION (US$3.3 TRILLION annualized)! Over the same period, Chinese banks have issued a whopping US$ 1.2 TRILLION of new yuan denominated lending! Great charts from Yardeni.com.

Money is NEVER static. Money flows into some assets or is spent on investments or used for consumption. At present times, a key symptom of massive inflationism has been RECORD global equity prices.

And central bankers are livid to the cleansing the system through genuine tightening. Proof? US stocks hit record as Ms. Yellen reversed course to turn dovish last week: "Because the neutral rate is currently quite low by historical standards, the federal funds rate would not have to rise all that much further to get to a neutral policy stance," Yellen will tell Congress.” (bold added)

We have seen this applied here before. Ex-Governor Tetangco warned about excessive stocks and property speculation TWICE in August* and October 2014**. The Phisix was below 7,400 then. That was at the same time he implemented modest tightening.


In 2015, he changed course. He oddly kept mum on stocks even when it raced to 8,000. But he also exculpated real estate from any claims of imbalances.

Though I hope that the new Governor would introduce discipline, as a matter of political expediency, I don’t think he would. But I’d be glad to be proven wrong.  And I would support such moves to avert a cataclysmic outcome.

Go for authentic reforms Governor. Make it happen.
 
Oh by the way, even in the face of the BSP’s debt monetization and historic interest rates, the Philippine sovereign yield curve appears to be dramatically flattening. Even without the BSP’s actions, the market appears to be showing signs of substantial tightening.

The Philippines’ RECORD TWIN Deficits, Bubble’s Crowding Out Effect on the GDP

Last week, I expounded on the marginal changes occurring in the government’s GDP.

Because of the combined main issues of liberalization (a wonderful thing) and the BSP’s first emergency measures in 2008-2009, the bubble sectors, namely, trade, real estate and construction continues to absorb immense amount of resources (measured by industry GDP) and finances (measured by share of bank credit) at the expense of the others.

By the end of 2016, these sectors accrued a significant 38.62% share of the GDP and 38.31% share of the BSP’s banking credit portfolio.

Yet to include the financials and the hotel sectors, these sectors would account for about half of the share of GDP and banking system’s credit

The gravitation of resources and finances into these sectors, which are symptoms of the frantic race to build supply, has only increased concentration risks. Such are manifestations of malinvestments which have been nurtured by artificially low policy rates.

Bubble’s Crowding Out Effect on GDP; Record Trade Deficit in 2016

Naturally, the GDP share gained by these sectors translates to an equivalent GDP share lost by other sectors.

 
It’s interesting to note that manufacturing, agriculture, and electricity have been trending down prior to 2008. However, since the BSP’s first emergency measure, the scale of the declines have only accelerated.

Meanwhile, the share of transportation has risen from 1998 until 2005. From then, transportation has joined the rest downwards.

The share of mining has steadily risen from 1998 until 2011. Apparently, commodity bear markets, the previous regime’s war on mining plus shifting interests to the popular sectors caused the industry’s share to tumble too.

The hotel industry, which is part of the other sector category, has been revitalized with the BSP’s actions.

Gains in the share of the bubble sectors imply of OVERINVESTMENTS. On the other hand, reduction in the share of ex-bubble sector translates to UNDERINVESTMENTS.

For instance, the underinvestment in agriculture translates to increased sensitivity to price changes given the limited supply. Demand and supply shocks may easily incite price spikes in food products. From the government’s data, food accounts for the largest share of the consumer spending basket. 

UNDERINVESTMENTS translate to investment opportunities too.

But don’t expect any significant changes in the present environment given the yield-chasing and trend-following dynamic on such popular sectors.

The public’s psychology on such bubble sectors has developed into a religion. The belief is that there is a SINGLE path to paradise.

And ex-bubble sectors have linkages with the popular sector. Demand from these underinvested industries partly depends on such popular sectors

These sectors are not entirely impervious to any drastic market clearing process which the bubble sector may endure. But once the rebalancing process begins, the same sectors will incur or take much less damage compared to its popular contemporaries

Besides, given the lengthy period of underinvestments, these sectors are the likely beneficiaries of such rebalancing process. But this won’t happen overnight but through a longer cycle. And these would be conditional to the political environment too. Will investments in these sectors be considered palatable politically?


 
Well, international merchandise trade has been affected too. Since the new millennium, exports have played a diminishing role in the GDP.

With manufacturing as its main input, the decline in the share of manufacturing to GDP has resonated with the health of exports

Because demand has to be filled by supply, imports have largely substituted for the gap in supply caused by manufacturing deficiencies (partly through politics, e.g. increased regulations due to Kentex Slipper fire)

Like the record fiscal deficit in 2016, trade deficit turned to a RECORD Php 1.3 trillion! The share of the trade deficit to GDP has reached an astounding 9% - higher than 2002’s 8.94%.

Exports are used to pay for imports. But the Philippines remain lucky enough to have remittances and BPOs to cover such vacuum.

Nevertheless, the Philippines posted TWIN RECORD DEFICITs in 2016.

The Philippine economy has been spending FAR MORE than it has been earning. Worst, such spending binge has INCREASINGLY been financed by credit and by national government debt monetization by the BSP predicated on increased fiscal expenditures.

And the government’s proposed aggressive infrastructure programs will only exacerbate the current conditions.

At the rate the current dynamics have evolved, not even BPOs and remittances will be enough to cover them.

Moreover, as the GDP dynamic has shown, the rise of the bubble sectors (shopping malls, real estate and hotels) has crowded out the other sectors.

With aggressive government infrastructure spending plans, the same crowding out dynamic will occur most likely at the expense of the private sector in the real economy.

And the same crowding out dynamic will impact financing which will be ventilated primarily through the exchange rate values and through interest rates.

Don’t forget, such twin deficits will eventually force the government to borrow USD in order to finance, not only its spending but for domestic USD liquidity purposes.

When I was still on the side of bulls I wrote this: [Philippine Government Applies Keynesian Remedies, Boom Bust Cycle Ahead January 20,2012]

So the Philippine government via the BSP will push real interest rates deeper into negative territory (left window) that will punish the saving public and the average fixed income investors. This represents a policy which redistributes resources from creditors (again savers) to borrowers (I would guess would be mostly cronies), that benefits the politically privileged banking system (as intermediaries), aside from encouraging the public to take on speculative activities (stock market boom as previously predicted) and a misdirection of capital towards long range investments. Such policies also will promote consumption activities which will likely lead to trade deficits.

These are composite ingredients to the business cycle or boom bust cycle.

I should have written record trade deficits

Oh, a bonus quote on the predicament of Indonesia’s 7-11 franchise.

From Nikkei Asia Review (July 15, 2017) [bold added]

On June 22, Modern Internasional announced the closure of more than 100 7-Eleven shops in Indonesia run by its subsidiary, Modern Sevel Indonesia. At a news conference, Donny Sutanto, a commissioner with Modern Internasional, said the company had been "too aggressive" in expanding the business in the early years. For example, it built a central kitchen that can supply food for up to 500 stores.

"In 2009 and 2010, the performance of our stores was so good, that it became the subject of discussion everywhere. ... After that, we opened more stores quite quickly and aggressively," Sutanto said.

But competition was intensifying, with many new players coming into Indonesia's convenience store industry. Sales began dropping following the government's ban on alcohol sales at convenience stores in April 2015, and as the economy slowed. That affected people's purchasing power, he said.

Modern Internasional posted a net loss of 58 billion rupiah ($3.75 million) in 2015, a figure that ballooned to 636 billion rupiah last year. In the first quarter of 2017 alone, the publicly listed company reported 447 billion rupiah in net losses. Sutanto said the 7-Eleven business has been the main contributor to the losses. "This is a good lesson for us," he said.

The company said it will sell land and buildings that it owns to pay off its remaining debt. For the bulk of its 7-Eleven stores that are run under lease contracts, Modern Sevel will end the leases or negotiate with parties that assume control of them.

Rings a bell?

June GIR Skids 4.54%
 
Finally, the audacious infrastructure program has hardly taken off, yet the government’s stock of foreign currency reserve remains under pressure.

Last June, Gross International Reserves (GIR) fell by US$764 million to US $81.41 billion, mainly due to sales of the BSP’s foreign investments (US$ 683 million) in support of the peso. Part of the decline has been the slide in gold’s USD price. Nevertheless, the BSP continues to use FX derivatives to bolster its GIR.

The rate of the decline of the June GIRs at -4.54% has reached 2014 levels or the year of the taper tantrum.

It would be interesting to see how GIRs will continue to fare as the USD-PHP weakens.

I suspect that the BSP intervened aggressively in the USD-PHP market at the close of the two sessions last Tuesday and Wednesday. The USD PHP was nearly at 50.9 when a big seller of USD brought the USD Peso to 50.53 precipitately. Such interventions, which was timed with the close, happened in the course of about 3 minutes.

The BSP has been airing their intentions that they “will intervene if they detect excessive volatility”. But the public doesn’t know how the BSP defines “excessive”. My guess is that “excessive” is when it goes against the expectations of the BSP leaders.

Interventions may work over the short term. However, when the BSP is engaged in NG debt monetization, it’s like the right hand doesn’t know what the left hand is doing. Such blatant self-contradiction on their policies extrapolates to the needless squandering of the public’s resources