Low Prioritization in the Banking System: The Magna Carta for MSMEs as a ‟Symbolic Law‟

 

An ever-weaker private sector, weak real wages, declining productivity growth, and the currency’s diminishing purchasing power all indicate the unsustainability of debt levels. It becomes increasingly difficult for families and small businesses to make ends meet and pay for essential goods and services, while those who already have access to debt and the public sector smile in contentment. Why? Because the accumulation of public debt is printing money artificially—Daniel Lacalle 

Nota Bene: Unless some interesting developments turn up, this blog may be the last for 2024. 

In this issue 

Low Prioritization in the Banking System: The Magna Carta for MSMEs as a ‟Symbolic Law‟

I. MSMEs: The Key to Inclusive Growth

II. The Politicization of MSME Lending

III. Bank's MSME Loans: Low Compliance Rate as a Symptom of the BSP’s Prioritization of Banking Interests

IV. Suppressed MSME Lending and Thriving Shadow Banks: It’s Not About Risk Aversion, but Politics

V. Deepening Thrust Towards Banking Monopolization: Rising Risks to Financial System Stability  

VI. How PSEi 30's Debt Dynamics Affect MSME Struggles

VII. The Impact of Bank Borrowings and Government Debt Financing on MSMEs’ Challenges 

VIII. How Trickle-Down Economics and the Crowding Out Effect Stifle MSME Growth 

IX. Conclusion: The Magna Carta for MSMEs Represents a "Symbolic Law," Possible Solutions to Promote Inclusive MSME Growth 

Low Prioritization in the Banking System: The Magna Carta for MSMEs as a ‟Symbolic Law‟ 

Despite government mandates, bank lending to MSMEs reached its third-lowest rate in Q3 2024, reflecting the priorities of both the government and the BSP. This highlights why the Magna Carta is a symbolic law.

I. MSMEs: The Key to Inclusive Growth 

Inquirer.net December 10, 2024 (bold added): Local banks ramped up their lending to micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in the third quarter, but it remained below the prescribed credit allocation for the industry deemed as the backbone of the Philippine economy. Latest data from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) showed total loans of the Philippine banking sector to MSMEs amounted to P500.81 billion in the three months through September, up by 3 percent on a quarter-on-quarter basis. But that amount of loans only accounted for 4.6 percent of the industry’s P11-trillion lending portfolio as of end-September, well below the prescribed credit quota of 10 percent for MSMEs. Under the law, banks must set aside 10 percent of their total loan book as credit that can be extended to MSMEs. Of this mandated ratio, banks must allocate 8 percent of their lending portfolio for micro and small businesses, while 2 percent must be extended to medium-sized enterprises. But many banks have not been compliant and just opted to pay the penalties instead of assuming the risks that typically come with lending to MSMEs. 

Bank lending to the MSME sector, in my view, is one of the most critical indicators of economic development. After all, as quoted by the media, it is "deemed as the backbone of the Philippine economy." 

Why is it considered the backbone?

Figure 1

According to the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), citing data from the Philippine Statistics Authority, in 2023, there were "1,246,373 business enterprises operating in the country. Of these, 1,241,733 (99.63%) are MSMEs and 4,640 (0.37%) are large enterprises. Micro enterprises constitute 90.43% (1,127,058) of total establishments, followed by small enterprises at 8.82% (109,912) and medium enterprises at 0.38% (4,763)." (Figure 1 upper chart) 

In terms of employment, the DTI noted that "MSMEs generated a total of 6,351,466 jobs or 66.97% of the country’s total employment. Micro enterprises produced the biggest share (33.95%), closely followed by small enterprises (26.26%), while medium enterprises lagged behind at 6.77%. Meanwhile, large enterprises generated a total of 3,132,499 jobs or 33.03% of the country’s overall employment." (Figure 1, lower graph) 

Long story short, MSMEs represent the "inclusive" dimension of economic progress or the grassroots economy—accounting for 99% of the nation’s entrepreneurs, and providing the vast majority of jobs. 

The prospective flourishing of MSMEs signifies that the genuine pathway toward an "upper middle-income" status is not solely through statistical benchmarks, such as the KPI-driven categorization of Gross National Income (GNI), but through grassroots-level economic empowerment. 

Except for a few occasions where certain MSMEs are featured for their products or services, or when bureaucrats use them to build political capital to enhance the administration’s image, mainstream media provides little coverage of their importance.

Why?

Media coverage, instead, tends to focus disproportionately on the elite.

Perhaps this is due to survivorship bias, where importance is equated with scale, or mostly due to principal-agent dynamics. That is, media organizations may prioritize advancing the interests of elite firms to secure advertising revenues, and or, maintain reporting privileges granted by the government or politically connected private institutions. 

II. The Politicization of MSME Lending 

Yet, bank lending to the sector remains subject to political directives—politicized through regulation. 

Even so, banks have essentially defied a public mandate, opting to pay a paltry penalty: "The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas shall impose administrative sanctions and other penalties on lending institutions for non-compliance with provisions of this Act, including a fine of not less than five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00)." (RA 9501, 2010)

Figure 2 

With total bank lending amounting to Php 10.99 trillion (net of exclusions) at the end of Q3, the compliance rate—or the share of bank lending to MSMEs—fell to 4.557%, effectively the third lowest on record after Q1’s 4.4%. (Figure 2, upper window) 

That’s primarily due to growth differentials in pesos and percentages. For instance, in Q3, the Total Loan Portfolio (net of exclusions) expanded by 9.4% YoY, compared to the MSME loan growth of 6.5%—a deeply entrenched trend.(Figure 2, lower image) 

Interestingly, "The Magna Carta for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs)" was enacted in 1991 (RA 6977), amended in 1997 (RA 8289), and again in 2008 (RA 9501). The crux is that, as the statute ages, industry compliance has diminished 

Most notably, banks operate under cartel-like conditions. They are supervised by comprehensive regulations, with the BSP influencing interest rates through various channels—including policy rates, reserve requirement ratios (RRR), open market operations, inflation targeting, discount window lending, interest rate caps, and signaling channels or forward guidance. 

In a nutshell, despite stringent regulations, the cartelized industry is able to elude the goal of promoting MSMEs. 

III. Bank's MSME Loans: Low Compliance Rate as a Symptom of the BSP’s Prioritization of Banking Interests 

Yet, the record-low compliance rate with the Magna Carta for MSMEs points to several underlying factors: 

First, banks appear to exploit regulatory technicalities or loopholes to circumvent compliance—such as opting to pay negligible penalties—which highlights potential conflicts of interest. 

Though not a fan of arbitrary regulations, such lapses arguably demonstrate the essence of regulatory capture, as defined by Investopedia.com, "process by which regulatory agencies may come to be dominated by the industries or interests they are charged with regulating" 

A compelling indication of this is the revolving-door relationship between banks and the BSP, with recent appointments of top banking executives to the BSP’s monetary board. 

Revolving door politics, according to Investopedia.com, involves the "movement of high-level employees from public-sector jobs to private-sector jobs and vice versa" 

The gist: The persistently low compliance rate suggests that the BSP has prioritized safeguarding the banking sector's interests over promoting the political-economic objectives of the Magna Carta legislation for MSMEs.

IV. Suppressed MSME Lending and Thriving Shadow Banks: It’s Not About Risk Aversion, but Politics

Two, with its reduced lending to MSMEs, banks purportedly refrain from taking risk. 

But that’s hardly the truth.

Even with little direct access to formal or bank credit, MSME’s are still borrowers, but they source it from the informal sector. 

Due to the difficulty of accessing bank loans, MSMEs in the Philippines are borrowing from informal sources such as the so-called 5-6 money lending scheme. According to an estimate, 5-6 money lending is now a Php 30 billion industry in the Philippines. These lenders charge at least 20% monthly interest rate, well above the 2.5% rate of the government’s MSME credit program. The same study by Flaminiano and Francisco (2019) showed that 47% of small and medium sized enterprises in their sample obtained loans from informal sources. 

...

An estimate by the International finance Corporation (2017) showed that MSMEs in the Philippines are facing a financing gap of USD 221.8 billion. This figure is equivalent to 76% of the country’s GDP, the largest gap among the 128 countries surveyed in the IFC report. (Nomura, 2020)

The informal lenders don’t print money, that’s the role of the banks, and the BSP.

Simply, the Nomura study didn’t say where creditors of the informal market obtained their resources: Our supposition: aside from personal savings, 5-6 operators and their ilk may be engaged in credit arbitrage or borrow (low interest) from the banking system, and lend (high interest) to the MSMEs—virtually a bank business model—except that they don’t take in deposits.

The fact that despite the intensive policy challenges, a thriving MSME translates a resilient informal credit arbitrage market—yes, these are part of the shadow banking system.

As an aside, uncollateralized 5-6 lending is indeed a very risky business: collections from borrowers through staggered payments occur daily, accompanied by high default rates, which explains the elevated interest rates.

Figure 3

That is to say, the shadow banks or black markets in credit, fill the vacuum or the humungous financing gap posed by the inadequacy of the formal financial sector. (Figure 3, upper diagram)

The financing gap may be smaller today—partly due to digitalization of transactional platforms—but it still remains significant. 

This also indicates that published leverage understates the actual leverage in both the financial system and the economy. 

Intriguingly, unlike the pre-2019 era, there has been barely any media coverage of the shadow banking system—as if it no longer exists.

As a caveat, shadow banking "involves financial activities, mainly lending, undertaken by non-banks and entities not regulated by the BSP," which implies that even formal institutions may be engaged in "unregulated activities." 

Remember when the former President expressed his desire to crack down on 5-6 lending, vowing to "kill the loan sharks," in 2019? 

If such a crackdown had succeeded, it could have collapsed the economy. So, it’s no surprise that the attempt to crush the informal economy eventually faded into oblivion. 

The fact that informal credit survived and has grown despite the unfavorable political circumstances indicates that the suppressed lending to MSMEs has barely been about the trade-off between risk and reward. 

It wasn’t risk that has stymied bank lending to MSMEs, but politics (for example, the artificial suppression of interest rates to reflect risk profiles). 

More below. 

Has the media and its experts informed you about this?

Still, this highlights the chronic distributional flaws of GDP: it doesn’t reflect the average experience but is instead skewed toward those who benefit from the skewed political policies. 

In any case, mainstream media and its experts tend to focus on benchmarks like GDP rather than reporting on the deeper structural dynamics of the economy.

V. Deepening Thrust Towards Banking Monopolization: Rising Risks to Financial System Stability

Three, if banks have lent less to MSMEs, then who constituted the core of borrowers?

Naturally, these were the firms of elites (including bank borrowings), the consumers from the "banked" middle and upper classes, and the government.

Total Financial Resources (TFR) reached an all-time high of Php 32.8 trillion as of October, accounting for about 147% and 123% of the estimated real and headline GDP for 2024, respectively. (Figure 3, lower pane)

TFR represents gross assets based on the Financial Reporting Package (FRP) of banking and non-bank financial institutions, which includes their loan portfolios.

The banking system’s share of TFR stood at 83.2% last October, marking the second-highest level, slightly below September’s record of 83.3%. Meanwhile, Universal-Commercial banks accounted for 77.8% of the banking system’s share in October, marginally down from their record 78% in September.

These figures reveal that the banking system has been outpacing the asset growth of the non-banking sector, thereby increasing its share and deepening its concentration.

Simultaneously, Universal-Commercial banks have been driving the banking system’s growing dominance in TFR. 

The significance of this lies in the current supply-side dynamic, which points towards a trajectory of virtual monopolization within the financial system. As a result, this trend also magnifies concentration risk. 

VI. How PSEi 30's Debt Dynamics Affect MSME Struggles

From the demand side, the 9-month debt of the non-financial components of the PSEi 30 reached Php 5.52 trillion, the second-highest level, trailing only the all-time high in 2022. However, its share of TFR and nominal GDP has declined from 17.7% and 30.8% in 2023 to 16.7% and 29.3% in 2024.

Figure 4

Over the past two years, the PSEi 30's share of debt relative to TFR and nominal GDP has steadily decreased. (Figure 4, upper chart) 

It is worth noting that the 9-month PSEi 30 revenues-to-nominal GDP ratio remained nearly unchanged from 2023 at 27.9%, representing the second-highest level since at least 2020. (Figure 4, lower image) 

Thus, the activities of PSEi 30 composite members alone account for a substantial share of economic and financial activity, a figure that would be further amplified by the broader universe of listed stocks on the PSE. 

Nevertheless, their declining share, alongside rising TFR, indicates an increase in credit absorption by ex-PSEi and unlisted firms. 

VII. The Impact of Bank Borrowings and Government Debt Financing on MSMEs’ Challenges

Figure 5

On the other hand, bank borrowings declined from a record high of Php 1.7 trillion (49.7% YoY) in September to Php 1.6 trillion (41.34% YoY) in October. Due to liquidity concerns, most of these borrowings have been concentrated in T-bills. (Figure 5, topmost visual) 

As it happens, Philippine lenders, as borrowers, also compete with their clients for the public’s savings. 

Meanwhile, the banking system’s net claims on the central government (NCoCG) expanded by 8.3% to Php 5.13 trillion as of October. 

The BSP defines Net Claims on Central Government as including "domestic securities issued by and loans and advances extended to the CG, net of liabilities to the CG such as deposits." 

In October, the banks' NCoCG accounted for approximately 23% of nominal GDP (NGDP), 18% of headline GDP, and 15.6% of the period’s TFR. 

Furthermore, bank consumer lending, including real estate loans, reached a record high of Php 2.92 trillion in Q3, supported by an unprecedented 22% share of the sector’s record loan portfolio, which totaled Php 13.24 trillion. (Figure 4, middle graph) 

Concomitantly, the banking system’s Held-to-Maturity (HTM) assets stood at nearly Php 3.99 trillion in October, just shy of the all-time high of Php 4.02 trillion recorded in December 2023. Notably, NCoCG accounted for 128.6% of HTM assets. HTM assets also represented 15.1% of the banking system’s total asset base of Php 26.41 trillion. (Figure 4, bottom chart) 

This means the bank’s portfolio has been brimming with loans to the government, which have been concealed through their HTM holdings.

Figure 6

Alongside non-performing loans (NPLs), these factors have contributed to the draining of the industry’s liquidity.  Despite the June 2023 RRR cuts and the 2024 easing cycle (interest rate cuts), the BSP's measures of liquidity—cash-to-deposits and liquid assets-to-deposits—remain on a downward trend. (Figure 6, upper window)

VIII. How Trickle-Down Economics and the Crowding Out Effect Stifle MSME Growth 

It is not just the banking system; the government has also been absorbing financial resources from non-banking institutions (Other Financial Corporations), which amounted to Php 2.34 trillion in Q2 (+11.1% YoY)—the second highest on record. (Figure 6, lower graph)

These figures reveal a fundamental political dimension behind the lagging bank lending performance to MSMEs: the "trickle-down" theory of economic development and the "crowding-out" syndrome affecting credit distribution. 

The banking industry not only lends heavily to the government—reducing credit availability for MSMEs—but also allocates massive amounts of financial resources to institutions closely tied to the government. 

This is evident by capital market borrowings by the banking system, as well as bank lending and capital market financing and bank borrowings by PSE firms. 

A clear example is San Miguel Corporation's staggering Q3 2024 debt of Php 1.477 trillion, where it is reasonable to assume that local banks hold a significant portion of the credit exposure. 

The repercussions, as noted, are significant: 

Its opportunity costs translate into either productive lending to the broader economy or financing competitiveness among SMEs (Prudent Investor, December 2024)

Finally, in addition to the above, MSMEs face further challenges from the "inflation tax," an increasing number of administrative regulations (such as minimum wage policies that disproportionately disadvantage MSMEs while favoring elites), and burdensome (direct) taxes.

IX. Conclusion: The Magna Carta for MSMEs Represents a "Symbolic Law," Possible Solutions to Promote Inclusive MSME Growth 

Ultimately, the ideology-driven "trickle-down" theory has underpinned the political-economic framework, where government spending, in tandem with elite interests, anchors economic development. 

Within this context, the Magna Carta for MSMEs stands as a "Symbolic Law" or "Unenforced Law"—where legislation "exists primarily for symbolic purposes, with little to no intention of actual enforcement." 

Politically, a likely short-term populist response would be to demand substantial increases in penalty rates for non-compliance (to punitive levels, perhaps tied to a fraction of total bank assets). However, this approach would likely trigger numerous unintended consequences, including heightened corruption, reduced transparency, higher lending rates, and more. 

Moreover, with the top hierarchy of the BSP populated by banking officials, this scenario is unlikely to materialize. There will be no demand for such measures because only a few are aware of the underlying issues. 

While the solution to this problem is undoubtedly complex, we suggest the following:

1 Reduce government spending: Roll back government expenditures to pre-pandemic levels and ensure minimal growth in spending.

2 Let markets set interest rates: Allow interest rates to reflect actual risks rather than artificially suppressing them.

3 Address the debt overhang through market mechanisms: Let markets resolve the current debt burden instead of propping it up with unsustainable liquidity injections and credit expansions by both the banking system and the BSP.

4 Liberalize the economy: Enable greater economic and market liberalization to reflect true economic conditions.

5 Adopt a combination of the above approaches.

The mainstream approach to resolving the current economic dilemma, however, remains rooted in a consequentialist political scheme—where "the end justifies the means."

This mindset often prioritizes benchmarks and virtue signaling in the supposed pursuit of MSME welfare. For example, the establishment of a credit risk database for MSMEs is presently touted as a solution.

While such measures may yield marginal gains, they are unlikely to address the root issues for the reasons outlined above.

_____

References 

Republic Act 5901: Guide to the Magna Carta for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (RA 6977, as amended by RA 8289, and further amended by RA 9501), p.17 SME Finance Forum 

Margarito Teves and Griselda Santos, MSME Financing in the Philippines: Status, Challenges and Opportunities, 2020 p.16 Nomura Foundation 

Prudent Investor, Is San Miguel’s Ever-Growing Debt the "Sword of Damocles" Hanging over the Philippine Economy and the PSE? December 02, 2024

 

 

October’s Historic Php 16.02 Trillion Public Debt: Insights on Spending, Employment, Bank Credit, and (November’s) CPI Trends

 

The essence of public debt, as a financing institution, is that it allows the objective cost of currently financed expenditure projects to be postponed in time. For the taxpayer, public debt delays the necessity of transferring command over resource services to the treasury. —James M. Buchanan, “Confessions of a Burden Monger” 

In this issue

October’s Historic Php 16.02 Trillion Public Debt: Insights on Spending, Employment, Bank Credit, and (November’s) CPI Trends

I. Preamble: The Perils of a Credit-Financed Economy

II. Analyzing Fiscal Policy: A Critical Perspective of the Record Php 16.02 Trillion Public Debt

III. Why Public Debt Will Continue to Rise: The Continuing Burden of the Military and Uniformed Personnel Pension (MUP) System 

IV. Pre-Election Labor Data? Declining Labor Participation Boosts Employment, While Agriculture Jobs Rise Despite Typhoons

V. Debt-Driven Consumption: The Risks of Unsustainable Household Borrowing

VI. Near Full Employment and Record Leverage, Yet a Tepid CPI Bounce in October: What Happened to Demand? 

VII. Philippine Public Debt Hits Record Highs in October 2024: Rising FX and Fiscal Risks Ahead!

October’s Historic Php 16.02 Trillion Public Debt: Insights on Spending, Employment, Bank Credit, and (November’s) CPI Trends 

Philippine public debt hit a record Php 16.02 trillion last October. Here are the reasons why it is likely to maintain its upward trajectory.

I. Preamble: The Perils of a Credit-Financed Economy

This week’s outlook builds on last week’s exposition, "Debt-Financed Stimulus Forever? The Philippine Government’s Relentless Pursuit of 'Upper Middle-Income' Status."

But here’s a brief preamble that encompasses our economic analysis over time—dedicated to our new readers. 

1 Spending reflects the ideology underpinning the Philippine approach to economic development. 

2 This Keynesian-based framework has been built on a "top-down" or "trickle-down" model, relying on the elites and the government to drive growth. 

3 Consequently, the nation's political and economic structures have been significantly shaped by this approach.

Figure 1

For instance, the elite owned universal-commercial banks have restructured their operations to prioritize consumer lending over industrial loans. Banks have also controlled 83.3% of the Total Financial Resources (TFR) as of September (or Q3). (Figure 1, top and middle charts) 

4 A key outcome of this credit-driven spending is the historic savings and investment gap (SIG), manifested by the "twin deficits." These deficits reached unprecedented levels during the pandemic recession in 2020–2021, as the National Government and the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) stepped in to rescue the banking system and protect elite interests. (Figure 1, bottom window) 

5 Credit-financed private sector investments have also included speculative activities based on a "build it, and they will come" or "race-to-build supply" dogma.  These activities span sectors such as real estate, infrastructure, construction, retail, and accommodations. 

6 Since these deficits require substantial funding—and with the government, non-financial corporations (including PSEi-listed firms), and even banks now acting as net borrowers—households and external savings have become critical sources for bridging this economic gap. 

7. In addition to the erosion of the peso's purchasing power, the depletion of savings is clearly reflected in the scale of financing requirements. 

Figure 2 

Even by mainstream measures, the nation’s gross savings rate has been on a downward trend since 2009, despite a brief two-year recovery in 2022 and 2023, from the lows of 2021. (Figure 2, topmost graph) 

8. Trends in motion tend to stay in motion—until a crisis emerges. 

Thus, it comes as no surprise that the serial expansion of systemic leverage—encompassing public debt and bank credit growth—has become the cornerstone of the "top-down" spending-driven GDP architecture. 

II. Analyzing Fiscal Policy: A Critical Perspective of the Record Php 16.02 Trillion Public Debt

Bureau of Treasury, December 3:  The NG's total outstanding debt stood at P16.02 trillion as of end-October 2024, reflecting a 0.8% or P126.95 billion increase from the end-September 2024 level. The increase was primarily driven by the valuation impact of peso depreciation against the US dollar from 56.017 at end-September 2024 to 58.198 at end-October 2024. Of the total debt stock, 67.98% is composed of domestic securities, while 32.02% consists of external obligations. (bold added) 

Bureau of Treasury, October 1: The National Government’s (NG) total outstanding debt stood at P15.55 trillion as of the end of August 2024, reflecting a 0.9% or P139.79 billion decrease from the end July 2024 level. This decline was primarily attributed to the revaluation effect of peso appreciation and the net repayment of external debt (bold added) 

“Look,” the establishment analyst might argue, “strong revenues have led to a declining fiscal deficit, and consequently, increases in debt have also decreased.” (Figure 2, middle diagram) 

We counter, "Yes, but that view is backward-looking." As economist Daniel Lacalle observed, "Deficits are always a spending problem because receipts are, by nature, cyclical and volatile, while spending becomes untouchable and increases every year."

That is to say, analyzing public balance sheets is more about theory than statistical analysis.

First, despite the hype surrounding the supposed ‘multipliers’ of deficit spending, diminishing returns are a natural outcome of political policies and are therefore unsustainable. 

Why has Japan endured an era known as the "lost decades" if this prescription worked? And if public spending is so successful, pushing this reasoning with reductio ad absurdum logic, why not commit 100% of resources or embrace full socialization of the economy?

Second, as long as public spending rises—which is mandated by Congress—economic slowdowns or recessions magnify the risks of a fiscal blowout. The pandemic recession exemplifies this. (Figure 2, bottom image) 

Briefly, the embedded risks in fiscal health arise from the potential emergence of volatility in revenues versus political path dependency in programmed spending. 

Third, cui bono? Are the primary beneficiaries of spending not the political elites, bureaucrats, and the politically connected private sector? Without a profit-loss metric, there is no way to determine whether these projects hold positive economic value. 

For instance, government fees from infrastructure projects do not reflect market realities but are often subsidized to gain public approval. 

How much economic value is added, or what benefit does a newly erected bridge in a remote province or city provide relative to its costs?

Fourth, in a world of scarcity, government activities not only compete with the private sector but also come at its expense—resulting in the crowding-out effects. 

Since the government does not generate wealth on its own but relies on extraction from the productive sectors, how can an increase in government spending not reduce savings and, therefore, investments?

Figure 3

Have experts been blind to the fact that these "fiscal stabilizers" or present-day "Marcos-nomics" stimulus have been accompanied by declining GDP? (Figure 3, topmost chart)

Lastly, who ultimately pays for activities based on "concentrated benefits and dispersed costs," or political transfers through the Logic of Collective Action?

Wouldn’t that burden fall on present day savers and currency holders or the peso (through financial repression—inflation tax) as well as future generations?

III. Why Public Debt Will Continue to Rise: The Continuing Burden of the Military and Uniformed Personnel Pension (MUP) System

A segment of the government’s October jobs report offers valuable insights into the trajectory of public spending. 

The basic pay for personnel in the Philippine military or Armed Forces is higher than, or on par with, the salaries of top-tier positions in the private sector. (Figure 3, middle graph) 

This is remarkable. 

The data reflects the political priorities of the government. 

After the overthrow of the Marcos 1.0 regime, the civilian government sought to pacify a restive military bureaucracy by granting pay increases and other benefits or perquisites. 

The previous administration implemented across-the-board pay raises to maintain favor with the military.

These actions have contributed to significant excesses in the unfunded Military and Uniformed Personnel (MUP) pension system, which now poses an increasing risk of "fiscal collapse. The system’s unfunded pension liabilities are estimated at Php 9.6 trillion, equivalent to 53% of the Philippines’ gross domestic product (GDP).

Yet, even after the Department of Finance (DoF) proposed reforms in 2023 to address these issues, the reform bill remains pending in Congress and could remain unresolved due to internal dissent.

It goes without saying that the recent pay increases affirm a subtle transition to a war economy, which will be publicly justified in the name of "defense" or under the guise of "nationalism." 

Yet, by setting pay scales higher than those in the private sector, the government have been prioritizing political appeasement over fostering the productive economy. This misalignment could lead to further erosion of the private sector. 

Consequently, this egregious pay disparity may incentivize individuals to seek government employment over private-sector jobs, potentially crowding out labor from the productive economy. 

These developments contradict the government’s stated goal of positioning the Philippines as a global investment hub. 

Perhaps partly due to MUP operating under unprogrammed funding, public debt increases have risen disproportionately above public expenditures. (Figure 3, lowest image) 

Needless to say, due to the protection of entrenched interest groups, public debt will continue to rise. 

IV. Pre-Election Labor Data? Declining Labor Participation Boosts Employment, While Agriculture Jobs Rise Despite Typhoons 

As an aside, authorities reported a slight increase in the unemployment rate, rising from 3.7% in September to 3.9% in October. Conversely, the employment rate declined slightly from 9.63% to 9.61%. Both figures remain close to the milestone rates of 3.1% and 9.69%, respectively, achieved in December 2023.

Figure 4

The increase in the employment rate, however, was driven by a drop in labor force participation. (Figure 4, upper visual)

Despite the population aged 15 and above increasing by 421,000 month-on-month (MoM) in October, the number of employed individuals decreased by 1,715,000, while the labor force shrank by 1,643,000. 

The Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) explains that the non-labor force population includes "persons who are not looking for work because of reasons such as housekeeping, schooling, and permanent disability." 

This highlights how arbitrary qualifications can inflate the employed population figures. 

Interestingly, among the three major employment sectors, only agriculture recorded a MoM increase (+282,000). Industry (-48,000) and services (-1,950,000) both experienced significant declines. Of the 21 employment subcategories, only seven posted expansions, led by agriculture (+323,000), construction (+234,000), and accommodation (+163,000). (Figure 4, lower chart) 

Notably, government and defense jobs saw a sharp drop of 358,000. 

The near all-time highs in labor data appear to be strategically timed for the upcoming elections. 

V. Debt-Driven Consumption: The Risks of Unsustainable Household Borrowing

Figure 5

On a related note, the BSP reported all-time highs in universal and commercial (UC) consumer lending last October, driven by credit card, auto, and salary loans in nominal or peso amounts. (Figure 5, topmost window) 

Household borrowings surged with 23.6% year-on-year (YoY) growth, fueled by increases of 27.8%, 18.34%, and 18.5%, respectively. (Figure 5, middle graph) 

This blazing growth rate has pushed the share of these loans in the bank’s portfolio to unprecedented heights. 

This dynamic indicates that "banked" households have been steadily increasing their leverage to support consumption and, possibly, to refinance existing debt. 

However, as the PSEi30’s Q3 data reveals, despite high employment rates and the rapid rise in household leverage, consumer spending remained sluggish. 

This suggests three possibilities: wage growth has been insufficient to keep up with current price levels, households are increasingly reliant on debt to bridge the gap and maintain their lifestyles, or it is a combination of both factors. 

Additionally, despite the BSP implementing a second rate cut, UC total bank lending growth showed early signs of slowing, decelerating from 11.32% in September to 10.7% in October. 

Do these trends imply a productivity-driven or credit-driven economy? 

At the current pace of unsustainable household balance sheet leveraging, what risks loom for consumers, the banking system, and the broader economy? 

VI. Near Full Employment and Record Leverage, Yet a Tepid CPI Bounce in October: What Happened to Demand? 

Still, despite near full employment, increases in household and production loans have failed to boost liquidity, savings, and inflation. 

October M3 growth remained stagnant at 5.5% from a month ago.

Also, the October CPI rose marginally from 2.3% to 2.5%, while core inflation increased from 2.4% to 2.5% over the same period. (Figure 5, lowest chart)

Additionally, could the CPI be nearing its bottom?

Might this signal the onset of the third wave in the inflation cycle that began in 2015?

Will a fiscal blowout fuel it?

Figure 6

Ironically, what happened to the correlation between systemic leveraging and the CPI? While systemic leveraging has been rising since Q3 2024, the CPI has failed to recover since peaking in Q1 2023. (Figure 6, topmost pane) 

Or, what happened to the record consumer leveraging, rising production debt, and near all-time highs in government spending? Why has demand slowed in the face of milestone-high systemic leveraging (public spending + bank credit expansion)?

Have the balance sheets of the private sector become a barrier to 'spending-based GDP'?

Intriguingly, while the government attributes the rise in the October CPI to typhoons (Typhoon Kristine and Typhoon Leon), which have caused price increases due to supply-side disruptions in food, jobs data indicate that such natural calamities have actually bolstered agricultural employment.

This possibly suggests a belief in the "broken window fallacy"—the misconception that growth can be driven by disasters or war!

These are incredible contradictions!

VII. Philippine Public Debt Hits Record Highs in October 2024: Rising FX and Fiscal Risks Ahead!

Circling back to the unparalleled Php 16.02 trillion debt, which—according to the BTr report—has risen due to the decline of the peso.

In contrast, when public debt declined last August, the improvement was also attributed to the strengthening of the Philippine peso.

While changes in the USDPHP exchange rate influence the nominal amount of public debt, the government continues to borrow heavily from both local and international capital markets. For instance, in Q3, the BSP approved state borrowings amounting to USD 3.81 billion. (Figure 6, middle image)

Following the surge in Q1 2023, foreign exchange (FX) borrowings by the public sector have continued to climb.

Moreover, since reaching a low of 28.12% in March 2021, the share of FX borrowings has been on an upward trend, with October’s share of 32.02% approaching May 2020's level of 32.13%. (Figure 6, lowest diagram)

This trend also applies to foreign debt servicing, as demonstrated last week, where FX-denominated servicing for the first ten months increased from 18.08% in 2023 to 21.9% in 2024.

Figure 7

In the face of fiscal stabilizers (deficit spending), the external debt of the Philippines continues to reach record highs in Q2, primarily due to state borrowings, which accounted for 57% of the total. Borrowing by banks and non-banks has also been on the rise. (Figure 7, topmost visual)

Debt levels in Q3 are likely to hit a new milestone given the approval of state FX loans by the BSP. 

Inadequate organic FX resources—reflected in revenues and holdings—have led to "synthetic dollar shorts," as highlighted last November. 

Meanwhile, the BSP appears to be rebuilding its FX reserves to restore the 85-88% range, which likely represents its USD anchor (de facto US dollar standard) for stabilizing the USDPHP exchange rate and domestic monetary operations. (Figure 7, middle image)

As of August, the BSP’s international reserves remain below this anchor level, as well as below its domestic security holdings. These holdings were used to inject a record Php 2.3 trillion to stabilize the banking system in 2020-2021.

While the liquidity injected remains in the system, it seems insufficient, as a 'black hole' in the banking sector appears to be absorbing these funds.

Compounding the issue, the lack of domestic savings to finance the widening savings-investment gap (SIG)—manifested through the "twin deficits"—necessitates more borrowing, both domestic and FX-denominated.

This deepening reliance on spending driven by the savings-investment gap increases the risk of a fiscal deficit blowout, accelerating the pace of debt accumulation 

Because the establishment peddles the notion that links public debt conditions to the USDPHP exchange rate, the BSP has recently been intensively intervening to bring the exchange rate below the 59 level.

These interventions are evident in the 5.6% year-on-year drop in November’s gross international reserves (GIR), which fell to USD 108.47 billion—well below the Q2 external debt figure of USD 130.18 billion. (Figure 7, lowest graph)

Yet, the wider this SIG gap becomes, the greater the pressure on the government, the BSP, and the economy to borrow further to meet FX requirements.

Debt-Financed Stimulus Forever? The Philippine Government’s Relentless Pursuit of "Upper Middle-Income" Status

 

Deficits are always a spending problem, because receipts are, by nature, cyclical and volatile, while spending becomes untouchable and increased every year—Daniel Lacalle

In this issue

Debt-Financed Stimulus Forever? The Philippine Government’s Relentless Pursuit of "Upper Middle-Income" Status

I. Changes in Tax Collection Schedules Distort Philippine Treasury Data and Highlight Fiscal Cycles; Spending’s Legal Constraints

II. Stimulus Forever? The Quest for "Upper Middle-Income" Status and Credit "A" Rating, Rising Risks of a Fiscal Blowout

III. 10-Month Public Revenue Growth Deviates from PSEi 30’s Activities

IV. Q3 2024: 2nd Highest Revenue to NGDP, Headline GDP Weakens—The Crowding Out Effect?

V. Record 10-Month Expenditure: The Push for "Big Government"

VI. 10-Month Debt Servicing Costs Zoom to All-Time Highs!

VII. Rising Foreign Denominated Debt Payments!

VIII. Despite Slower Increases in Public Debt, Little Sign of the Government Weaning Off Stimulus

IX. Q3 2024: Public Debt to GDP rises to 61.3%

X. Conclusion: The Relentless Pursuit Of "Upper Middle Income" Status Resembles a Futile Obsession 

Debt-Financed Stimulus Forever? The Philippine Government’s Relentless Pursuit of "Upper Middle-Income" Status 

Improvements in the 10-month fiscal balance have fueled the Philippine government’s unrealistic fixation on achieving 'Upper Middle Income' status—here's why. 

I. Changes in Tax Collection Schedules Distort Philippine Treasury Data and Highlight Fiscal Cycles; Spending’s Legal Constraints 

Inquirer.net, November 28: A double-digit revenue growth helped swing the government’s budget position back to a surplus in October, keeping the 10-month fiscal deficit below the 2024 ceiling set by the Marcos administration. The government ran a budget surplus of P6.3 billion in October, a reversal from the P34.4- billion deficit recorded a year ago, figures from the latest cash operations report of the Bureau of the Treasury (BTr) showed. 

Most media outlets barely mention that recent changes in tax collection schedules have distorted the Bureau of the Treasury’s reporting data. 

As noted in September, these adjustments significantly impact the perception of fiscal performance. 

That is to say, since VAT payments are made at the end of each quarter but recorded in the first month of the following quarter, this quarterly revenue cycle inflates reported revenues for January, April, July and October, often resulting in a narrowed deficit or even a surplus for these months. 

Therefore, we should anticipate either a surplus or a narrower deficit this October. (Prudent Investor, October 2024)

Figure 1 

For instance, October’s surplus of Php 6.34 billion underscores how the quarterly revenue cycle boosts collections at the start of every quarter, often leading to either a surplus or a narrowed deficit. Surpluses were observed in January, April, and October this year. (Figure 1, topmost chart) 

However, as the government pushes to meet its year-end 'budget execution' targets in December, a significant spike in the year-end deficit could emerge from the remaining spending balance. 

Based on the budget allocation for 2024 amounting to Php 5.768 trillion, the unspent difference from the ten-month spending of Php 4.73 trillion is Php 1.038 trillion. 

Notably, in contrast to previous years, 2024 has already experienced three months of public spending exceeding Php 500 billion, with December still underway. (Figure 1, middle image) 

On the other hand, this could indicate a potential frontloading of funds to meet year-end targets. 

While spending excesses are constrained by law, the government has consistently exceeded enacted budget allocations since 2019. (Figure 1, lowest diagram) 

Consequently, this trend, shaped by political path dependency, suggests that the remaining Php 1.038 trillion could likely be surpassed. 

According to the Department of Budget and Management (DBM), budget adjustments are permissible under specific conditions: (DBM, 2012) 

1.    Enactment of new laws,

2.    Adjustments to macroeconomic parameters, and

3.    Changes in resource availability. 

These provisions may provide political rationales to justify increases in the allocated budget.

Figure 2

Expenditures, while down from last month, remain within their growth trajectory, while revenues have so far outperformed expectations. (Figure 2, topmost graph)

Despite October’s 22.6% revenue growth contributing to a lower ten-month deficit—down from Php 1.018 trillion in 2023 to Php 963.9 billion—it remains the fourth largest on record.

II. Stimulus Forever? The Quest for "Upper Middle-Income" Status and Credit "A" Rating, Rising Risks of a Fiscal Blowout

What is seldom mentioned by mainstream media is that such deficits serve as "fiscal or automatic stabilizers," ostensibly for contingent or emergency (recession) purposes.

While authorities repeatedly propagate their intent to elevate the economy to "upper middle-income" status and attain a credit "A" rating soon, they fail to disclose that current political-economic conditions are still functioning under or reflect continued reliance on a "stimulus" framework.

In fact, as we keep pointing out, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP)’s reserve requirement ratio (RRR) and interest rate cuts represent monetary measures, while authorities have ramped up fiscal measures or "Marcos-nomics stimulus" for their political agenda—namely, pre-election spending and a subtle shift toward a war economy, alongside centralization through increased public spending and an enlarged bureaucracy or "Big Government."

Finally, while expenditures adhere to programmed allocations and revenues fluctuate based on economic and financial conditions as well as administrative efforts, they remain inherently volatile.

Any steep economic slowdown or recession would likely compel the government to increase spending, potentially driving the deficit to record levels or beyond.

Unless deliberate efforts are made to curb spending growth, the government’s ongoing centralization of the economy will continue to escalate the risk of a fiscal blowout.

Despite the mainstream's Pollyannaish narrative, the current trajectory presents significant challenges to long-term fiscal stability.

III. 10-Month Public Revenue Growth Deviates from PSEi 30’s Activities

Let us now examine the details.

In October, public revenue surged by 22.6%, driven primarily by a 16.94% growth in tax revenues, with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) contributing 16.19% and the Bureau of Customs (BOC) 11.5%. Meanwhile, non-tax revenues soared by 87.7%, largely due to revenues from other offices, including "privatization proceeds, fees and charges, and grants."

These activities boosted the 10-month revenue growth from 9.4% in 2023 to 16.8% this year, largely driven by a broad-based increase, largely powered by non-tax revenues.

It is worth noting that, despite reaching a record high in pesos, the BIR’s net income and profit growth significantly softened to 8.3%, the lowest since 2021, remaining consistent with the 9-month growth rate.  This segment accounted for 50% of the BIR’s total intake. (Figure 2, middle pane)

In contrast, sales taxes jumped by 30.6% over the first 10 months, marking the highest growth rate since at least 2017, and represents 30% of the BIR’s total revenues. Sales taxes vaulted by 31.6% in the first 9 months. (Figure 2, lowest chart)

The reason for focusing on the 9-month performance is to compare its growth rate with that of the PSEi 30, allowing for a closer understanding or providing a closer approximation of the BIR's topline performance.

Figure 3

Unfortunately, when using same-year data, the PSEi 30 reported a 9-month revenue growth of 8.1%, the slowest since 2021. This pattern is echoed in its net income growth of 6.8%, which is also the most sluggish rate since 2021. (Figure 3 upper window) 

To put this in perspective, as previously discussed, the 9-month aggregate revenues of the PSEi 30 represent approximately 27.9% of the nominal gross domestic product (NGDP) for the same period. 

IV. Q3 2024: 2nd Highest Revenue to NGDP, Headline GDP Weakens—The Crowding Out Effect? 

In its September disclosure, the Bureau of the Treasury cited changes in the VAT schedule as a key factor boosting tax collections: " The increase in VAT collections in 2024 is partly due to the impact of the change in payment schedule introduced by the TRAIN law provision which allows the tax filers to shift from monthly to quarterly filing of VAT return" (Bureau of Treasury, October 2024) [bold added] 

Once again, the adjustment in VAT schedules played a pivotal role in increasing revenues, helping to reduce the deficit and debt—a topic we discussed in September 2024 (Prudent Investor, September 2024). 

Or, whether by design or as an unintended consequence, a critical factor in the slower deficit has been a shift in government tax collection and accounting procedures. 

But what will happen if, under the same economic conditions or with only slight improvements, the effects of such transient changes wear off? Will the deficit soar again? 

Moreover, it is important to note that all this is occurring while bank credit expansion and public debt are at record highs. 

What will happen to credit and liquidity-fueled demand once household and corporate balance sheets become saturated with leverage? 

It’s also noteworthy that, even as the share of revenue to nominal GDP (NGDP) reached its highest level in Q2 and Q3 of 2024, real GDP continues its downward trend—a dynamic that has persisted since 2016 and reemerged in 2021. (Figure 3, below graph) 

Are these not symptoms of the "crowding-out effect," where the increasing share of government interventions, measured by expenditures, debt, and deficits, translates into diminished savings and capital available for private sector investments? 

V. Record 10-Month Expenditure: The Push for "Big Government" 

But what about expenditures? 

Local Government Unit (LGU) spending surged by 11.97%, and national disbursement growth reached 14.3%, powering an overall increase in October expenditures of 11.1%. Interest payments, on the other hand, fell by 6.1%. The former and the latter two accounted for shares of 18.1%, 66.64%, and 11.9% of the total, respectively.

For the first 10 months of the year, expenditures grew by 11.5%, reaching a record-high Php 4.73 trillion, driven by LGU spending, National disbursements, and interest payments, which posted growth rates of 9.1%, 11.9%, and 23.03%, respectively.

As noted above, these record expenditures are primarily focused on promoting political agendas: pre-elections, a subtle shift towards a war economy, and an emphasis on centralization through infrastructure, welfare, and bureaucratic outlays.

Figure 4

One notable item has played a considerable role: 10-month interest payments not only outperformed other components in terms of growth but also reached a record high in peso terms. (Figure 4, topmost graph) 

Additionally, their share of total expenditures rose to levels last seen in 2009. 

That said, the ratio of expenditures to NGDP remains at 23.98% in Q2 and Q3 and has stayed within the range of 22% to 26%—except for two occasions—since Q2 2020. (Figure 4, middle chart) 

Over the past 18 quarters, this ratio has averaged 23.4%. 

As mentioned above, despite all the hype about achieving "upper middle income" status and attaining a "Class A" credit rating, the Philippines continues to operate under a fiscal stimulus framework, which has only intensified with recent policies which I dubbed as "Marcos-nomics stimulus."

In the timeless words of the distinguished economist Milton Friedman, "Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program."

Current conditions also validate the "Big Government" theory articulated by the economist Robert Higgs, particularly regarding what he termed "The Ratchet Effect." This concept refers to the "tendency of governments to respond to crises by implementing new policies, regulations, and laws that significantly enhance their powers. These measures are typically presented as temporary solutions to address specific problems. However, in history, these measures often outlast their intended purpose and become a permanent part of the legal landscape." (Matulef, 2023)

The push towards "Big Government" is evident, with approximately a quarter of the statistical economy deriving from direct government expenditures.

This figure does not include the indirect contributions from private sector participation in government activities, such as public-private partnerships (PPPs), suppliers, outsourcing and etc. 

As a caveat, the revenue and expenditure-to-NGDP ratio is derived from public revenue and spending data and nominal GDP—an aggregate measure where government spending is calculated differently—potentially leading to skewed interpretations of its relative size. 

In any case, as the government grows, so too does its demand for resources and finances—all at the expense of the private sector, particularly micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), as well as the purchasing power of the average Filipinos, represented here as Pedros and Marias. 

While government fiscal health may provide some insights into its size, there are numerous hidden or immeasurable costs associated with its expansion: compliance costs, public sector inefficiencies, regulatory and administrative burdens, policy uncertainty, moral hazard, opportunity costs, reduced incentives for innovation, deadweight losses, productivity costs, economic distortions, social and psychological costs, and more.

VI. 10-Month Debt Servicing Costs Zoom to All-Time Highs!

Rising interest payments represent some of the symptoms of "Big Government."

What’s remarkable is that, in just the first 10 months of 2024, the cost of servicing debt (amortization plus interest) soared to an all-time high of Php 1.86 trillion—16% higher than the previous annual record of Php 1.603 trillion set in 2023. And there are still two months to go! (Figure 4, lowest visual)

Amortization and interest payments exceeded their 2023 annual figures by 25.3% and 1.65%, respectively. 

Notably, amortization payments surged by a staggering 760% in October alone, reaching Php 161.5 billion.

As a result, amortization and interest payments have already surpassed their full-year 2023 totals. However, because the government categorizes amortizations (or principal payments) as financing rather than expenditures, they are not included in the budget.

VII. Rising Foreign Denominated Debt Payments!

There's more to consider.

Figure 5

Payments (amortization + interest) on foreign-denominated debt in the first 10 months of 2024 increased by 52%, reaching a record high. This brought their share of total payments to 21.9%, the highest since 2021. (Figure 5, topmost chart)

Unsurprisingly, the government borrowed USD 2.5 billion in the end of August, likely to refinance existing obligations. Adding to this, authorities reportedly secured another $500 million loan from the Asian Development Bank last week in the name of "climate financing."

Nonetheless, these serve as circumstantial evidence of increased borrowing to fund gaps, reflecting the "synthetic dollar short" position discussed last week.

VIII. Despite Slower Increases in Public Debt, Little Sign of the Government Weaning Off Stimulus

Here’s where mainstream narratives often place emphasis: a slower deficit translates into slower growth in public debt. (Figure 5, middle graph)

In other words, a decrease in financing requirements or a reduction in the rate of increase in public debt decreases the debt/GDP ratio.

Authorities are scheduled to announce public debt data next week.

The apparent gaslighting of fiscal health suggests that authorities are employing tactical measures to improve macroeconomic indicators temporarily. These efforts seem aimed at buying time, likely in the hope that the economy will gain sufficient traction to mask structural weaknesses.

Still, while public debt continues to rise—albeit at a slower pace—bank financing of public debt through net claims on the central government (NCoCG), which began in 2015, appears to have temporarily plateaued. At the same time, the BSP's direct financing of the national government seems to have stalled. (Figure 5, lowest image)

However, none of these emergency measures have reverted to pre-pandemic levels.

The government shows no indication of weaning itself off the stimulus teats.

IX. Q3 2024: Public Debt to GDP rises to 61.3%

Unfortunately, the record savings-investment gap underscores a troubling reality: the GDP is increasingly propped up by debt.

While mainstream narratives highlight the prospect of a lower public debt-to-GDP ratio, they often fail to mention that public debt does not exist in isolation.

In the aftermath of the Asian Financial Crisis, the Philippine economy underwent a cleansing of its balance sheet, which had been marred by years of malinvestment. When the Great Financial Crisis struck in 2007-2008, the Philippine economy rebounded, aided by the national government’s automatic stabilizers and the BSP's easing measures.

However, during that period, the BSP mirrored the Federal Reserve's policy playbook, prompting the private sector to absorb much of the increased borrowing. This reduced the economy’s reliance on deficit-financed government spending and shifted the debt burden from the public to the private sector, enabling a decline in the public debt-to-GDP ratio.

Today, however, this is no longer the case.

Figure 6

Following the pandemic-induced recession, where bank credit expansion slowed, the government stepped in to take the reins, driving public debt-to-GDP to surge. As of Q3, it remained at 61.3%—the second highest level since 2021’s peak of 62.6% and the highest since 2004. 

Currently, despite high-interest rate levels, both public borrowing and universal commercial bank lending have been in full swing—resulting in a systemic leverage ratio (public debt plus universal commercial bank credit) reaching 108.5% of nominal GDP in 2023. 

This means that the government, large corporations, and many households with access to the banking system are increasingly buried in debt.  

In any case, debt is perceived by consensus as a "free lunch," so you hardly ever hear them talk about it. 

X. Conclusion: The Relentless Pursuit Of "Upper Middle Income" Status Resembles a Futile Obsession 

In conclusion, while current fiscal metrics may appear to show surface-level improvements, the government remains addicted to various free-lunch policies characterized by easy money stimulus. 

The government and elites will likely continue to push for a credit-driven savings-investment gap to propel GDP growth, leading to further increases in debt levels and necessitating constant liquidity infusions that heighten inflation risks. 

The establishment tend to overlook the crowding-out effects stemming from government spending (and centralization of the economy), which contribute to embedding of the "twin deficits" that require more foreign financing—ultimately resulting in a structurally weaker economy. 

The relentless pursuit of "upper middle income" status resembles a futile obsession—a "wet dream" driven more by the establishment’s obsession with benchmarks manifesting social signaling than substantive progress. 

For distributional reasons (among many others), the GDP growth narrative does not reflect the true state of the economy. 

Persistent self-rated poverty and hunger, widening inequality, elevated vacancies in the real estate sector, low savings rates, and stagnating productivity are clear indicators that GDP number benefits a select few at the expense of many. This, despite debt levels soaring to historic highs with no signs of slowing. 

Even the Philippine Statistics Authority’s (PSA) per capita consumer and headline GDP trendlines contradict the notion of an imminent economic or credit rating upgrade. 

While having the U.S. as a geopolitical ally could offer some support in the pursuit of cheaper credit through a potential credit upgrade, it is important to acknowledge that actions have consequences—meaning the era of political 'free lunches' are numbered. 

And do authorities genuinely believe they can attain an economic upgrade through mere technical adjustments of tax schedules and dubious accounting practices, akin to the "afternoon delight" and 5-minute "pre-closing pumps" at the PSEi 30? 

Yet because the political elites benefit from it, trends in motion tend to stay in motion, until… 

___

References 

Prudent Investor, September 2024 Fiscal Deficit Highlights the "Marcos-nomics Stimulus"; How Deficit Spending Drives a WEAKER Philippine Peso October 28, 2024 

Department of Budget and Management, THE BUDGETING PROCESS, March 2012, dbm.gov.ph

Bureau of Treasury, September 2024 Budget Deficit at P273.3 Billion Nine-Month Deficit Narrowed to P970.2 Billion, October 24, 2024, treasury.gov.ph

Prudent Investor, Philippine Government’s July Deficit "Narrowed" from Changes in VAT Reporting Schedule, Raised USD 2.5 Billion Plus $500 Million Climate Financing, September 1, 2024

Michael Matulef Beyond Crisis: The Ratchet Effect and the Erosion of Liberty, August 18, 2023, Mises.org