Liquidity Under Pressure: Philippine Banks Struggle in Q1 2025 Amid a Looming Fiscal Storm

 

Truth always originates in a minority of one, and every custom begins as a broken precedent—Nancy Astor 

In this issue: 

Liquidity Under Pressure: Philippine Banks Struggle in Q1 2025 Amid a Looming Fiscal Storm

I. Introduction: A Financial-Political Economic System Under Increasing Strain

II. Liquidity Infusion via RRR Cuts: A Paradox: Declining Cash Amid Lending Boom

III. Mounting Liquidity Mismatches: Slowing Deposits Amid Lending Surge, Liquidity Ratios Flashing Red

IV. Government Banks and Broader Financial Systemic Stress

V. Mounting Liquidity Mismatches: Record Surge in Bank Borrowings and Repo Market Heats Up

VI. RRR Cuts as a Lifeline, Not Stimulus, Why the Strain? Not NPLs, Not Profitability

VII. Bank-Financial Index Bubble and Benchmark-ism: Disconnect Between Profit and Market Valuation

VIII. Financial Assets Rise, But So Do Risks; Spotlight on Held-to-Maturity Assets (HTM); Systemic Risks Amplified by Sovereign Exposure

IX. Brace for the Coming Fiscal Storm

X. Non-Tax Revenues: A High Base Hangover; Rising Risk of a Consecutive Deficit Blowout

XI. April 2025 Data as a Critical Clue of Fiscal Health

XII. Aside from Deficit Spending, Escalating Risk Pressures from Trade Disruptions and Domestic Economic Slack

XIII. Final Thought: Deepening Fiscal-Bank Interdependence Expands Contagion Risk Channels 

Liquidity Under Pressure: Philippine Banks Struggle in Q1 2025 Amid a Looming Fiscal Storm 

Behind the balance sheets: why Philippine banks are bleeding cash even as lending accelerates—and what the looming fiscal blowout means for systemic risk. 

I. Introduction: A Financial-Political Economic System Under Increasing Strain

We begin our analysis of the Philippine banking system in Q1 2025 with our April assessment:

"However, the data suggests a different story: increasing leverage in the public sector, elite firms, and the banking system appears to be the real driver behind the BSP’s easing cycle, which also includes RRR reductions and the PDIC’s doubling of deposit insurance. 

"The evidence points to a banking system under strain—record-low cash reserves, a lending boom that fails to translate into deposits, and economic paradoxes like stalling GDP growth despite near-record employment." (Prudent Investor, April 2025) [bold italics original] 

The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) released pivotal data in its April 2025 Central Bank Survey (MAS) and an updated balance sheet and income statement for the Philippine banking system. 

The findings reveal a sector grappling with severe liquidity constraints despite aggressive monetary easing. 

This article dissects these challenges, exploring their causes, implications, and risks to financial stability, while situating them within the broader economic and fiscal landscape. 

II. Liquidity Infusion via RRR Cuts: A Paradox: Declining Cash Amid Lending Boom 

Figure 1

The second leg of the BSP’s Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR) reduction in March 2025 resulted in a Php 50.9 billion decrease in liabilities to Other Depository Corporations (ODCs) by April. 

When combined with the first RRR cut last October, the cumulative reduction from October to April amounted to a staggering Php 429.4 billion—effectively unleashing nearly half a trillion pesos of liquidity into the banking system via freed-up cash reserves. (Figure 1, topmost window) 

Even more striking was the BSP’s March report on the balance sheets of Philippine banks. The industry's "cash and due from banks" dived 28.95% year-on-year, from Php 2.492 trillion in 2024 to Php 2.09 trillion in 2025—its lowest level since at least 2014! (Figure 1, middle graph) 

This sharp drop calls into question the effectiveness of RRR cuts while also exposing deeper structural issues within the banking system. 

Ironically, this cash drain occurred alongside a robust expansion in bank lending. Yet, deposit growth stalled, which further strained liquidity and weighed on money supply growth. 

The limited impact of RRR reductions may reflect banks using freed-up reserves to cover existing liquidity shortfalls rather than fueling new lending or deposit growth. 

Meanwhile, the BSP’s move to double deposit insurance through the Philippine Deposit Insurance Corporation (PDIC) last March—nearly coinciding with the second phase of the RRR cut—signals growing concerns over depositor confidence, potentially foreshadowing broader financial stability risks 

III. Mounting Liquidity Mismatches: Slowing Deposits Amid Lending Surge, Liquidity Ratios Flashing Red 

The decline in cash reserves coincided with decelerating deposit growth, even as bank lending surged. 

Deposit liabilities growth fell to just 5.42% in March—its lowest since August 2019. The deceleration was mainly driven by a slowdown in peso deposits growth, from 6.28% in February to 5.9% in March. Foreign currency (FX) deposits also remained a drag, despite a modest improvement from 2.84% to 3.23%. (Figure 1, lowest diagram) 

In stark contrast, the banking sector’s total net lending portfolio (inclusive of RRPs and IBLs) surged to 14.5% in March from 12.31% in February.

Figure 2 

As a result, the ratio of "cash and due from banks" to total deposits has collapsed to 10.37% in March 2025, levels below those seen in 2013—underscoring an escalating liquidity mismatch! (Figure 2, upper pane) 

This divergence highlights a critical tension: despite BSP’s aggressive monetary easing, lending is not translating into deposit growth. Instead, it has created a liquidity conundrum—intensifying balance sheet strain. 

Beyond cash, the liquid assets-to-deposits ratio has fallen back to levels last seen in April 2020, effectively reversing the gains achieved during the BSP’s pandemic-era historic liquidity rescue. 

This indicates a depletion of liquid assets—comprising cash and net financial assets excluding equities—which are crucial for meeting withdrawal demands and regulatory requirements, making this decline a critical vulnerability. 

Curiously, cash positions reported by publicly listed banks on the PSE showed a 4.43% YoY increase, with only five of the 16 banks reporting a cash decline. This apparent contradiction prompted deeper scrutiny. (Figure 2, lower table) 

The divergence between lending and deposit growth indicates a breakdown in the money multiplier effect, where loans typically generate deposits as borrowers spend. 

Two critical factors likely driving the erosion of savings. 

First, steep competition arising from the financing crowding-out effect of government borrowing (via record deficit spending), which competes with banks and the non-financial sector for access to public savings, has been a key force in suppressing savings. 

Second, extensive debt accumulation from malinvestments in 'build-and-they-will-come' sectors further consumes savings and capital, exacerbating the decline. 

IV. Government Banks and Broader Financial Systemic Stress 

Our initial suspicion pointed to government banks (DBP and LBP) as potential sources of the cash shortfall.

Figure 3

However, BSP data revealed that liquidity pressures were widespread—not only affecting universal and commercial banks but also impacting thrift and rural-cooperative banks.  (Figure 3) 

Interestingly, these smaller banking institutions (rural-cooperative banks) displayed relatively better liquidity positions than their larger peers. 

This discrepancy could reflect differing reporting standards between disclosures to the public and to the BSP. 

Diverging indicators could also signal "benchmark-ism"—where worsening problems are obscured through embellished reporting. 

V. Mounting Liquidity Mismatches: Record Surge in Bank Borrowings and Repo Market Heats Up 

Another red flag is the record-high bank borrowing.

Figure 4

Total bank borrowings soared by 40.3% in March to an all-time high of Php 1.91 trillion. This pushed the borrowing-to-liabilities share to 7.89%—its highest level since the pandemic’s onset in March 2020. (Figure 4, topmost chart) 

The sharp rise was driven by bills payable, which skyrocketed by 65.4% in March. 

In contrast, bonds payable grew by just 4.12%. As a result, bills payable now make up 5.5% of total liabilities—almost double the 2.9% share of longer-term bonds. (Figure 4, middle image)

This asymmetry is mirrored in listed banks’ financials. Excluding BPI (which lumps bills under "other borrowed funds"), bills payable surged by 69.4% in Q1 2025 to Php 1.345 trillion. 

MBT alone reported a 214% increase to Php 608 billion—representing 45.21% of the aggregate from PSE-listed banks. 

Repo transactions also surged in March. (Figure 4, lowest diagram) 

Interbank repos hit an all-time high, while repo trades with the BSP reached the third highest level on record. This reflects increasing reliance on short-term funding mechanisms, a hallmark of tightening liquidity conditions. 

This reliance on short-term borrowing for bridge financing, while cost-effective in the near term, exposes banks to refinancing risks, particularly if interbank rates rise or market confidence falters. 

All this underscores that liquidity stress is not confined to a single quarter—it is deeply embedded in bank balance sheets. 

VI. RRR Cuts as a Lifeline, Not Stimulus, Why the Strain? Not NPLs, Not Profitability 

In hindsight, both legs or phases of the RRR cut were not preemptive monetary tools but reactive measures aimed at alleviating a growing liquidity crisis. 

Similarly, rate cuts—intended to reduce borrowing costs—only served to expose the structural weaknesses in the banking system.

Figure 5

According to the BSP, credit delinquency improved in March, with Gross and Net Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) as well as Distressed Assets showing a slight decline. (Figure 5, topmost pane) 

Indeed, the banking system posted a 10.6% YoY increase in Q1 2025 profits—better than last year’s 2.95%, but still significantly weaker than 2022–2023. It was also a deceleration from Q4’s 20.7%. 

While the profit rebound is positive, it may be artificially inflated by 'accounting acrobatics.' The slowdown relative to 2022–2023 suggests diminishing returns from lending—driven by weaker borrower demand, rising unpublished NPLs, or both.’

VII. Bank-Financial Index Bubble and Benchmark-ism: Disconnect Between Profit and Market Valuation 

Despite slowing profit growth, the PSE’s Bank dominated Financial Index continued to hit record highs in Q1 and into May 2025. This signals a disconnect between bank valuations and their actual financial or ‘fundamental’ performance. (Figure 5, middle graph) 

This growing divergence may reflect "benchmark-ism"—where inflated share prices are used to mask the sector’s internal fragilities, as previously discussed. 

Despite a sharp slowdown in revenue growth (10.37% vs. 24% in 2024), listed banks still posted a 7.5% increase in ‘accounting profits.”  (Figure 5, lowest diagram) 

In theory, profits should enhance liquidity, not diminish it—unless those profits are largely cosmetic—"benchmark-ism." 

For investors, the divergence between stock performance and fundamentals signals caution, as inflated valuations could unravel if liquidity pressures escalate. 

VIII. Financial Assets Rise, But So Do Risks; Spotlight on Held-to-Maturity Assets (HTM); Systemic Risks Amplified by Sovereign Exposure 

The rapid contraction in cash reserves cannot be fully attributed to lending, NPLs, or financial asset growth.

Figure 6

Bank financial assets (net) rose 11.8% to an all-time high of Php 7.89 trillion in March. Accumulated unrealized losses narrowed from Php 26.4 billion to Php 21.04 billion. (Figure 6, topmost chart) 

Instead, held-to-maturity (HTM) assets, primarily government securities, offer insight. 

After a period of stagnation, HTMs grew 1.7% in March—breaking the Php 4 trillion ceiling (since 2023) to reach a new high of Php 4.06 trillion. (Figure 6, middle image) 

Despite lower interest rates, banks have not pared back HTM holdings. That’s because most HTMs are composed of government securities, particularly "net claims on the central government" (NCoCG), which surged to a record Php 5.58 trillion in March. (Figure 6, lowest diagram) 

This spike aligns with the record Q1 fiscal deficit—and likely presages a similarly wide Q2 deficit.

IX. Brace for the Coming Fiscal Storm 

As we’ve consistently argued, rising sovereign risk will amplify the banking system’s fragility. 

A blowout fiscal deficit won’t just expose skeletons—such as questionable accounting practices used to inflate profits, understate NPLs, or distort share prices—it will likely push the BSP toward a more aggressive role in stabilizing the financial system. 

This intervention could have sweeping implications for financial markets and the broader economy.

Figure 7

The public and the market's complacency over the government's deteriorating fiscal position has been astonishing. 

In Q1 2025, a steep revenue decline triggered a record fiscal deficit blowout—comparable to historical first-quarter data. As a result, the deficit-to-GDP ratio surged to 7.3%, far above the government’s full-year target of 5.3% (DBCC). (Figure 7, topmost window) 

Markets have largely dismissed these data, buoyed by two ‘available bias’ heuristics: the midterm election cycle and a steady stream of official reassurances. 

Yet it is worth underscoring: the 7.3% deficit-to-GDP ratio masks the extent of dependence on deficit spending. That same deficit spending was a key driver behind Q1 2025’s 5.4% GDP growth—just as it has been in many previous quarters/years. 

Also, it is crucial to distinguish the nature of government spending and revenue: while expenditures are programmed or mandated by Congress, actual disbursements are increasingly prone to executive discretion, with breaches of the enacted budget observed over the past six straight years—symptoms of centralization of power. 

In contrast, revenues depend on both economic activity and administrative collection efforts. 

Despite a 13.6% year-on-year increase in tax revenues in Q1, this gain failed to offset the collapse in non-tax revenues, which plunged by 41.2%. This drop severely weakened the overall revenue base. 

X. Non-Tax Revenues: A High Base Hangover; Rising Risk of a Consecutive Deficit Blowout

Non-tax revenues surged by 57% in 2024, lifting their share of total collections to 13.99%—the highest since 2007’s 17.9%.  (Figure 7, second to the highest chart) 

With a long-term average of 11.7% since 2000, current levels are markedly elevated. Moreover, 2024 figures significantly exceeded the exponential trend, indicating the potential for a substantial retracement. 

While the official breakdown or targets for collection categories remain undisclosed, it is plausible that non-tax revenue targets for 2025 were benchmarked against last year’s elevated base—potentially complicating fiscal planning and exacerbating volatility in public revenue performance 

Authorities expect total revenues to reach 16.5% of GDP in 2025. Yet, in Q1, the revenue-to-GDP ratio slipped to 15.15%, reflecting the substantial shortfall in non-tax collections. 

This implies that the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) and Bureau of Customs (BOC)—which posted 16.7% and 5.7% year-on-year growth respectively in Q1—would need to significantly accelerate collections to bridge the gap. 

But the Q1 data suggests that current tax growth trends are unlikely to be sufficient. 

If tax revenue growth merely holds steady—or worse, underperform—then Q1’s historic deficit may not be a one-off.  

Instead, it risks being carried into Q2, leading to a second consecutive quarter of elevated deficits.  

This would reinforce perceptions of fiscal slippage or ‘entropy’, with direct implications for financial markets, interest rates, and banking sector dynamics.  

XI. April 2025 Data as a Critical Clue of Fiscal Health  

The Bureau of the Treasury is expected to release the April 2025 National Government Cash Operations Report (COR) in the final week of May.  

Due to the shift in VAT filing from monthly to quarterly, April’s figures will be the first major test of whether tax receipts can rebound sharply enough to counterbalance the Q1 shortfall.  

April is typically one of the stronger months for collections. For instance, in January 2024, the government recorded a Php 87.95 billion surplus—the highest since 2023—following changes in the VAT reporting regime. (Figure 7, second to the lowest graph) 

To keep the 2025 full-year deficit ceiling of Php 1.54 trillion within reach, the government would need to secure multiple monthly surpluses—or at least significantly smaller deficits. 

A hypothetical Php 200 billion surplus in April would be required to partially offset Q1’s Php 478 billion fiscal gap and keep the official trajectory on track.  

XII. Aside from Deficit Spending, Escalating Risk Pressures from Trade Disruptions and Domestic Economic Slack  

However, this fiscal balancing act is made more difficult by worsening external and domestic conditions.  

The global trade slowdown—exacerbated by ongoing trade tensions and supply chain fragmentation—will likely weigh on the Philippines’ external trade. 

Meanwhile, intensifying signs of slack in the domestic economy further threaten revenue generation, especially for the BIR and BOC. 

These pressures highlight the structural reliance on debt-financed deficit spending. 

Rising fiscal shortfalls increase sovereign risk, which can ultimately be transmitted into the broader economy through multiple channels—elevated inflation or stagflation risks, weakening credit quality or credit risks, liquidity pressures in the banking system and more. 

Contagion risks may also emerge in financial markets, manifesting through a surge in the USD/Php exchange rate (currency risk), rising bond yields (currently diverging from declining ASEAN counterparts) or interest rate risk, and amplified volatility in the stock market (including related markets—market risk). (Figure 7, lowest image) 

All these factors align with—and reinforce—the deteriorating liquidity and funding conditions apparent in bank balance sheets.

The nexus between fiscal fragility and banking stress is no longer theoretical; their growing interdependence is symptomatic in slowing deposit growth, increased reliance on repo markets, and rising bank borrowing. 

XIII. Final Thought: Deepening Fiscal-Bank Interdependence Expands Contagion Risk Channels 

As fiscal risks mount, so too does the potential for cross-sectoral contagion and cascading effects. The banking system—already struggling with liquidity depletion—faces heightened exposure due to its expanding claims on sovereign securities (implicit quantitative easing). 

Again, though partially obscured, stagflationary pressures, deteriorating credit quality, and rising funding costs may converge, amplifying broader macro-financial instability. 

In short, the fiscal storm is no longer a distant threat—it is approaching fast, and its first casualties may already be visible in the cracks forming across the financial system. 

______   

Reference 

Prudent Investor, BSP’s Fourth Rate Cut: Who Benefits, and at What Cost?, April 13,2025, Substack

Philippine PSEi 30’s Crash: Worst January Performance Since 2008 and Asia’s Laggard — A Liquidity-Driven Meltdown?

The stock market's job is to always make you feel like you are missing out on something. The stock market's job is to always make you feel like you should be doing something. The stock market's job is to get you to do the wrong thing at the wrong time—Ian Cassel

In this issue 

Philippine PSEi 30’s Crash: Worst January Performance Since 2008 and Asia’s Laggard — A Liquidity-Driven Meltdown?

I. A Lowly Voice in the Wilderness

II. January as Template for 2025 Performance

III. Double Top Pattern?

IV. Was The Selloff Driven By Escalating Liquidity Strains? San Miguel: The Canary in the Coal Mine?

V. Price Distortions from the Changes in PSE’s Membership Amplified the Market’s Volatility

VI. Summary and Conclusion

Philippine PSEi 30’s Crash: Worst January Performance Since 2008 and Asia’s Laggard — A Liquidity-Driven Meltdown?

The Philippine equity benchmark plummeted 10.2% in January, making it the worst performer in Asia. It was also the largest loss in the history of January since 2008. Could escalating liquidity strains be the driving force?

I. A Lowly Voice in the Wilderness 

First, the appetizer. 

Let’s revisit a few quotes from our previous posts when everyone was predicting a new bull market for the PSEi 30, with expectations of it reaching 7,500 in October. (bold and italics original) 

In the backdrop of lethargic volume, concentrated activities, and a rising share of foreign participation, a continuation of global de-risking and deleveraging translates to more liquidations here and abroad, which could expose many skeletons in the closet of the Philippine financial system. August 4, 2024 

...

The public has been largely unaware of the buildup of risks associated with pumping the PSEi 30, driven by a significant concentration in trading activities and market internals 

The market breadth exhibits that since only a few or a select number of issues have benefited from this liquidity-driven shindig, the invested public has likely been confused by the dismal returns of their portfolios and the cheerleading of media and the establishment. September 15, 2024

... 

Bottom line: The levels reached by the PSEi 30 and its outsized returns attained over a few months barely support general market activities, which remain heavily concentrated on the actions of the national team and volatile foreign fund flows.  

Instead, the present melt-up represents an onrush of speculative fervor driven by the BSP’s stealth liquidity easing measures, even before their rate cut. Moreover, real economic activities hardly support this melt-up. October 7, 2024 

...

Given the current global and domestic economic imbalances, the Year of the Snake may again usher in another period of heightened risk and potential volatility. January 19, 2025 

Next, the main course.

II. January as Template for 2025 Performance

The Philippines' main equity benchmark, the PSEi 30, plunged by 4.01% on the last trading day of January, dragging its weekly return to -6.9%, marking its fourth consecutive week of decline.

Figure 1

For the month, the PSEi 30 suffered a 10.2% loss Month on Month (MoM), its most significant monthly decline since the 12.8% crash in September 2022. Annually, it was down by 11.8%.

January is supposed to be the best month for the PSE, rising 9 times in 13 years, with an average return of 0.94%, including 2025.

Yet, returns have been declining both monthly and annually for the past decade and so. (Figure 1, upper window) 

True to the volatility of the Snake Year, 2025's 10.2% plunge on January 10 was the worst since 2008, during the Great Financial Crisis, which resulted in a 48% decline and the lowest PSEi 30 level since 2012. (Figure 1, lower image) 

Yet, if history were to rhyme, and if January’s performance serves as a template for 2025, it wouldn’t be surprising if the PSEi 30 faces a substantial setback.

Figure 2

As a result of this week’s thrashing, the Philippine PSEi 30 was the worst-performing Asian bourse. Ten of 19 national indices were down, one remained unchanged, with average returns at -0.41%. (Figure 2, topmost graph)

For January, with 10 of 19 national indices down and a YTD change of -0.5%, the Philippine PSEi 30 was the region's laggard. (Figure 2, middle chart)

Major ASEAN bourses, such as Thailand’s SET and Malaysia’s KLCI, were the weakest links in both weekly and monthly outcomes. (Figure 2, lowest diagram)

Could these be emerging signs of an Asian Financial Crisis 2.0?

III. Double Top Pattern? 

This week’s meltdown breached two minor support levels and now seems poised to challenge the October 2022 low.

Figure 3

From a technical analysis standpoint, the PSEi 30 is facing the potential of a 'double top' pattern, where a breakdown below the October low could lead to a retest of the March 2020 level. (Figure 3, upper image)

The panic selling suggests that a significant oversold rebound might be imminent, though the durability of this recovery could be suspect.

IV. Was The Selloff Driven By Escalating Liquidity Strains? San Miguel: The Canary in the Coal Mine?

Mainstream explanations for the selloff have often been influenced by the availability bias or "when people overweight new information or recent events" (Investopedia)

Could the recent sell-offs be attributed to the substantial shortfall in Q4 and 2024 GDP (a development we had anticipated)? 

Was it influenced by Trump's tariff threats or the Federal Reserve's pause in their easing cycle? 

Or might domestic politics play a role? Specifically, the threat by the BBM administration to shut down the government if the Supreme Court rules in favor of appellants challenging the constitutionality of their controversial budget, or the impending Food Emergency Security measure on rice, set to be implemented on February 4, 2025. 

Our best guess is that while these factors might have some influence, a more critical driver of the market turmoil could be the escalating pressures on financial liquidity. 

Unlike the 2022 episode, where inflation and rising interest rates were significant factors, the current scenario mirrors the dynamics of the pandemic recession—where the PSEi 30 declines despite monetary easing aimed at combating a recession. (Figure 3, lower graph)

Currently, the GDP growth rate has been decelerating.

Figure 4

Moreover, bank liquidity has been worsening as of November, due to investments in Held-to-Maturity (HTM) assets and undisclosed Non-Performing Loans (NPLs). The cash-to-deposits and liquid assets-to-deposits ratios have been on a long-term downtrend, with the former at its lowest level in over a decade. (Figure 4, topmost graph) 

As a reminder, the BSP cut official rates in August, October, and December. It also reduced RRR rates in October, while the aggregate fiscal spending in 11-months reached all-time highs (ATHs), signaling massive stimulus. 

Contrary to mainstream expectations, the BSP’s accommodative monetary policy has led to an increase in Treasury bond yields rather than a decrease. (Figure 4, middle image) 

This rise is influenced not only by the Federal Reserve's policies but also by domestic inflation, which has been incrementally rising. 

Additionally, the yield curve for local Treasuries has steepened significantly, indicating heightened inflation risks. (Figure 4, lowest chart) 

Lastly, San Miguel’s deviation from the recent market uptrend might have served as the canary in the coal mine, signaling potential broader market distress. 

Also from last October 7, 2024 

Finally, SMC share prices continue to move diametrically opposite to the sizzling hot PSEi 30. (Figure 7, lowest graph)  

What gives? Will SMC’s debt breach the Php 1.5 trillion barrier in Q3?    

Have SMC’s larger shareholders been pricing in developing liquidity concerns? If so, why are bank shares skyrocketing, when some of them are SMC’s biggest creditors?

Figure 5

San Miguel’s share price was one of the biggest casualties, diving below the panic levels of March 2020.  (Figure 5, upper window) 

Its market capitalization plunged to Php 155 billion while grappling with a debt of Php 1.477 trillion. Falling equity and rising debt—what could go wrong? 

Could there be domestic funds facing liquidity constraints, forced to raise cash quickly by selling at any price?  And has this liquidation exacerbated San Miguel’s financial dilemma?

V. Price Distortions from the Changes in PSE’s Membership Amplified the Market’s Volatility

Lastly, the reconstitution of the PSEi 30 has contributed to market volatility.

The inclusion of AREIT and China Banking Corporation (CBC), which will replace Wilcon (WLCON) and Nickel Asia (NIKL) effective February 4, 2025, resulted in steep declines for the outgoing stocks: WLCON fell 10.16%, and NIKL plummeted 30.2%. (Figure 5, lower graph)

Meanwhile, funds tracking the PSEi 30 rotated into CBC (+33.81%) and AREIT (+4.74%).

Figure 6

Fundamentals hardly explain the irrational share price behavior of the affected firms. 

CBC’s parabolic move has turned it into a meme stock or crypto, even as the share prices of its peers have tumbled.

In the meantime, it also doesn't explain the sharp drop in NIKL's price. Although nickel prices have been on a downtrend, they have not collapsed. (Figure 6 topmost pane)

Shares of competitors FNI and MARC were down 1.96% and 8.96%, respectively, WoW. (Figure 6, middle graph)

In short, the PSE's proclivity to chase top performers while discarding laggards has only amplified the price distortions within the PSEi 30. 

VI. Summary and Conclusion

The January 2025 meltdown has brought to light the deteriorating fundamentals underlying the Philippine financial markets and economy. 

This crisis is not isolated to the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE) but also resonates with some ASEAN counterparts. Could this be emerging signs of Asian Crisis 2.0? 

If historical trends of January and the volatility associated with the Year of the Snake are to repeat themselves, and if the double top pattern materializes, this suggests a significant deficit or loss for the PSEi 30 by the end of 2025. 

Could the recent turmoil in the PSEi 30 be indicative of escalating liquidity pressures among domestic fund managers? 

If this is the case, future stress could manifest in the treasury market and influence the US dollar-Philippine peso exchange rate $USDPHP. 

Certainly, given that the PSEi 30 has become heavily oversold, a notable rebound might be anticipated. However, this scenario presents not an opportunity for accumulation but rather for liquidation. 

Unless one is an expert in scalping, short-term trades involve significant risks (Figure 6, lowest chart)

Remember, cash remains the best defense against a bear market—whether through foreign exchange (FX) accounts or Treasury bills (T-bills).

___ 

Disclosure: The author holds a small position in NIKL as of the time of writing.

PSE Craters as Financials’ Share of the PSEi 30 Hits All-Time Highs; A Growing Mismatch Between Financial Index Performance and Bank Fundamentals

 

History will not be kind to central bankers fixated on financial economy and who created serial speculative booms to sustain the illusion of prosperity. It will also be critical of governments unwilling to address weaknesses, who deflected shifting hard policymaking to independent, unelected and largely unaccountable central banks—Satyajit Das 

In this issue 

PSE Craters as Financials’ Share of the PSEi 30 Hits All-Time Highs; A Growing Mismatch Between Financial Index Performance and Bank Fundamentals

I. PSEi 30 Craters on Signs of Re-Tightening Amid Rising Dollar and Higher UST Yields

II. Despite the Market Carnage: Financials Share of the PSEi 30 Zoom to All-time High!

III. Financialization: The Expanding Role of Banks in Achieving Political Goals

IV. "National Team?" In Q2, Other Financials Corporations Sold, the PSEi 30 Plunged

V. In Q3, Mismatch Between Financial Index-Bank Fundamentals Reached a Blow-off Phase!

VI. Worsening Bank Liquidity Conditions as Cash-to-Deposits Hit Milestone Low

VII. Liquidity and Collateral Crunch? Bank Borrowings, Focused on Bills, Zoomed to Record Highs in September, as Repos also Hit All-time Highs!

VIII. Despite Lower Rates Held to Maturity Assets Near All-time Highs, Record Bank QE

IX. A Snapshot of Q3 and 9-Month Performance of PSE Listed Banks

X. Highlights, Summary and Conclusion

PSE Craters as Financials’ Share of the PSEi 30 Hits All-Time Highs; A Growing Mismatch Between Financial Index Performance and Bank Fundamentals

Even as the PSEi plummeted due to signs of global and local re-tightening, the Financials outperformed, widening the mismatch between share prices and fundamentals. Will a reckoning come soon?

I. PSEi 30 Craters on Signs of Re-Tightening Amid Rising Dollar and Higher UST Yields"

Figure 1

The Sage of Omaha, Warren Buffett, once said, "Only when the tide goes out do you discover who's been swimming naked."

Have the signs of tightening upended the dream of easy money’s "goldilocks" economy, or have they exposed those who have been "swimming naked?"

The surging US dollar index, coupled with rising 10-year Treasury yields—both largely attributed to Trump's policies— has sent global risk assets tumbling. Yet, these developments took shape two months before the US elections. (Figure 1, topmost graph)

This includes the Philippine PSEi 30, which plunged by 4.31%, marking its largest weekly decline in 2024 and the steepest drop since the week of September 30, 2022, when it fell by 8.3%.

As of Thursday, November 14, the headline index broke below the 6,600 level, closing at 6,557.09.

A notable oversold rebound in industrials, led by Meralco (up by 7.78%) and Monde (up by 7.52%), along with financials from BPI (up by 3.7%) and CBC (up by 4.58%), contributed to a low-volume rally of 1.82% on Friday.

Year-to-date, the PSEi 30 is struggling to maintain its narrowing return of 3.5%.

II. Despite the Market Carnage: Financials Share of the PSEi 30 Zoom to All-time High!

The Financial Index, down by only 1.86%, was the least affected in this week’s market carnage. BPI was the only member of the PSEi 30 component to withstand the foreign-driven selloff, while Jollibee ended the week unchanged. (Figure 1, middle pane)

Interestingly, this outperformance has propelled the aggregate free-float market capitalization weighting of the three major banks of the headline index to an all-time high. (Figure 1, lowest chart)

Figure 2

Furthermore, financials accounted for 41.7% of the mainboard's volume on Friday—the third-highest share since October. (Figure 2, topmost diagram)

Meanwhile, October’s cumulative 29.92% accounts for the sector’s highest share since July 2023, which also translates to a 2017 high.

In a related note, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) has suspended its free publication of non-BSP-generated data, including PSE data on monthly price-earnings ratios (PER), market capitalization by sector, index data, and volume distribution by sector. This suspension hampers our ability to track critical developments in market internals. (Yes, I wrote them)

The point being, the increasing share of mainboard volume by the financial sector has pillared the rising share of the sector’s market cap share of the PSEi 30.

However, this dynamic also implies growing concentration risk in the stock market.

III. Financialization: The Expanding Role of Banks in Achieving Political Goals

Businessworld, November 13: THE PHILIPPINE banking system’s net profit jumped by 6.4% at end-September as both net interest and non-interest income grew, data from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) showed. The combined net income of the banking industry rose to P290 billion in the first nine months of 2024 from P272.6 billion in the same period a year ago.

The PHP 290 billion profit and a 6.4% growth rate represent the Q3 figures year-over-year (YoY).

Continuing from last week’s discussion, the diverging dynamics in the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE) have also been reflected in the GDP figures. 

Although the financial sector has been on an upward trajectory since the new millennium, its share of the real GDP has rapidly deepened during the BSP’s historic rescue of the sector. 

This was notably influenced by the BSP historic intervention to rescue the sector, which included an unprecedented PHP 2.3 trillion quantitative easing package, historic cuts in official and reserve ratios, as well as unparalleled subsidies and relief measures. 

In line with the rising share of money supply-to-GDP, the financial sector's share of GDP reached its third highest level at 10.8% in Q3. (Figure 2, middle image) 

It even hit an all-time high of 10.9% when considering the 9-month real GDP data. 

While this evolution may be labeled as "financialization," the essential message is clear: BSP policies have led to an economy increasingly immersed (or heavily reliant) in credit and liquidity, primarily channeled through an elite-owned and controlled banking system. 

This deepening dependence comes at the expense of the development of other competing financial conduits, such as capital markets. 

The underlying reason for this is political: the bank-led financial sector serves as the primary non-BSP financier of the government’s deficit spending. 

As a result, the government's calls for improvements in the capital markets appear to be mere lip service. 

However, judging by their "demonstrated preference" in policy choices, it appears that inflating bank shares may serve to camouflage the adverse consequences of this deepening and complex political-economic arrangement. 

IV. "National Team?" In Q2, Other Financials Corporations Sold, the PSEi 30 Plunged

The developments in Other Financial Corporations (OFCs) provide valuable insights. 

In Q2, OFCs eased their holdings of equities.  According to the BSP, "The other financial corporations’ claims on the other sectors dropped as their holdings of equity shares issued by other nonfinancial corporations fell." 

The Non-bank financial institutions and OFCs "includes the private and public insurance companies, other financial institutions that are either affiliates or subsidiaries of the banks that are supervised by the BSP (i.e., investment houses, financing companies, credit card companies, securities dealer/broker and trust institutions), pawnshops, government financial institutions and the rest of private other financial institutions (not regulated by the BSP) that are supervised by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)" (Armas, 2014) 

In the same quarter, OFC claims on the private sector decreased by 0.5% quarter-over-quarter (QoQ), while the PSEi 30 index plunged by 7.1%. (Figure 2, lowest visual) 

My guess is that some of these OFCs are part of what could be considered the Philippine version of the "national team." 

V. In Q3, Mismatch Between Financial Index-Bank Fundamentals Reached a Blow-off Phase!

Nevertheless, the deviation between the fundamentals of banks and their share prices has reached "blow-off" proportions!

Figure 3 

In Q3, the banking system reported a modest growth of 6.4%, slightly higher than Q2’s 4.1%. However, the financial index skyrocketed by 19.4% quarter-over-quarter (QoQ). 

From another angle, 9-month profit growth was up by 5.07%, even as the financial index surged by a stunning 23.4% year-on-year in Q3.

Worst of all, profit trends and the financial index have moved in opposite directions. 

Since profit growth peaked in Q3 2022 and subsequently eased, shares of the seven-member bank stocks (excluding the eighth member: PSE) within the financial index have continued to accelerate. (Figure 3, topmost window) 

Meanwhile, given that universal and commercial banks account for 93.9% of total bank assets, their profit growth largely mirrors the entire banking system. In Q3, profit growth was 7.03%, and on a 9-month basis, it stood at 6%. 

These figures underscore the increasing monopolization of the financial industry by banks validated by the BSP’s Total Financial Resources (TFR) data. 

Total financial resources grew by 10.07% to a record PHP 33.08 trillion. 

The banking sector’s share surged to an all-time high of 83.3%, driven mainly by universal and commercial banks, whose contribution reached a record 78.1%. (Figure 3, middle image) 

So let us get this straight: banks have increased their share of trading activities in the PSE, as well as their slice of both the PSEi 30 and the GDP pie. They now command 83.3% of total financial resources and are continuing to rise. 

This dominance doesn’t even account for their substantial role in the local bond markets, where they act as issuers, intermediaries, and holders. 

Even without the BSP acknowledging this, what we are witnessing is the intensifying risks within the Philippine financial-economic system. 

VI. Worsening Bank Liquidity Conditions as Cash-to-Deposits Hit Milestone Low

Have you ever seen any experts or establishment analysts address the developing contradiction between the banks' reported profits and their liquidity conditions? 

Cash and due from banks, or bank cash reserves, plummeted by 13.6% in September 2024, following a brief 4% rebound in August. This decline brought cash reserves to their lowest level since 2019. (Figure 3, lowest graph) 

To address the emerging liquidity shortfall, the BSP previously reduced the bank reserve requirement ratio (RRR) from 19% to 14%, implemented in seven installments from March 2018 to December 2019. 

Cash reserves saw a temporary spike in 2020 when the BSP injected Php 2.3 trillion into the system, accompanied by an RRR cut from 14% to 12% in April 2020. 

However, facing diminishing returns, cash reserves resumed their downward trend. 

Once again, doing the same thing and expecting different results, the BSP reduced the RRR by a larger margin than in 2020, lowering it from 12% to 9.5% in June 2023. 

Despite these efforts, the challenges within the banking system's cash reserve position have persisted.

Figure 4

Moreover, while the growth in peso deposit rates increased from 6.9% in August to 7.07% in September—the slowest growth rate since July 2023—the BSP’s cash-to-deposit ratio plummeted to 12.44%, its lowest ratio since at least 2013! (Figure 4, topmost and second to the highest graphs) 

Yet, with the record bank credit expansion, why the sluggish growth in deposits? Where did the money flow into? 

Even with the recent decline in inflation rates, have a minority of "banked" households continue to draw from their savings? 

Furthermore, the banks' liquid asset-to-deposit ratio, which includes both cash reserves and financial assets, fell to 50.34%, reverting to levels seen during the BSP's rescue efforts in July 2020. 

Incredible. 

And this is just one facet of the mounting liquidity challenges that banks seem to be facing. 

VII. Liquidity and Collateral Crunch? Bank Borrowings, Focused on Bills, Zoomed to Record Highs in September, as Repos also Hit All-time Highs! 

More eye-catching data emerged last September. 

Bank borrowings—primarily in short-term bills—skyrocketed to an all-time high! Borrowings surged by 49.7%, reaching a record PHP 1.7 trillion, with their share of total liabilities climbing to 7.3%, the highest since 2021. (Figure 4, second to the lowest and lowest charts) 

The liquidity shortfall is most pronounced over the short-term, this is why bank’s bills payable zoomed to unscaled heights.

Figure 5

Not only that, bank short-term repo (repurchase agreements) or RRP (reverse repurchase) operations with the BSP and other banks have also launched into the stratosphere!

With record repo operations, the RRP’s 3.72% share of the bank’s total assets surged to the highest level since at least 2015! (Figure 5, upper image) 

Could this rampant use of repurchase agreements (repos) be underlying growing collateral issues in the financial system? As banks increasingly depend on repos for short-term liquidity, are we witnessing a decline in the quality of collateral or a shortage of high-quality assets available for these transactions? 

These developments likely explain the BSP's abrupt announcement of the latest series of RRR cuts, which took effect last October. 

However, such actions resemble a Hail Mary pass, with RRR ratios now headed toward zero. 

VIII. Despite Lower Rates Held to Maturity Assets Near All-time Highs, Record Bank QE

Another paradox: banks reported that credit delinquencies—across the board—marginally declined in September. (Figure 5, lower diagram) 

If this is true, then higher profits combined with lower non-performing loans (NPLs) should result in more, not less liquidity 

Figure 6

Additionally, the easing of interest rates, as indicated by declining treasury yields, should have reduced banks' held-to-maturity (HTM) assets. As noted repeatedly, HTM assets drain liquidity because they lock up funds. (Figure 6, topmost graph)

Yet, there hasn’t been significant improvement in this area. 

Moreover, since authorities aim to meet year-end spending targets, boost GDP, and finance the upcoming elections, it is expected that the government will ramp up its deficit spending in Q4. 

This increase in public spending will likely lead to a rise in banks' and the financial sector’s net claims on central government (NCoCG), which may translate to higher HTM assets. (Figure 6, middle chart) 

Furthermore, if the current trend of declining inflation reverses, or we experience a third wave of rising inflation, banks might resort to accounting maneuvers to shield themselves from potential mark-to-market losses by shifting these assets into HTMs. 

That is to say, increases in debt-financed government spending and rising inflation rates could therefore result in higher levels of HTM assets.

Above all, banks are not standalone institutions; they have deep exposure to counterparties. As noted last week, 

Led by banks, the financial sector is the most interconnected with the local economy.  Its health is contingent or dependent upon the activities of its non-

financial counterparties. 

Alternatively, the sector’s outgrowth relies on political subsidies and is subject to diminishing returns. 

Yet ultimately, this should reflect on its core operational fundamentals of lending and investing. (Prudent Investor, October 2024) 

The transformational shift in the banking system’s business model—from production and consumption—could be ominous. Part of this shift has been motivated by pandemic-era subsidies and relief measures, as well as a move away from unproductive industry loans. 

As a result, the consumer share of total bank loans (excluding real estate) reached an all-time high of 14.9% in September 2024, while the share of production loans declined to 82.7%. The remaining 2.4% comes from non-resident loans. (Figure 6, lowest image) 

Banks have embraced the government’s belief that spending drives the economy, neglecting the balance sheet health of individuals, as well as the potential misallocations as a result of artificially low rates. 

But what happens to the consumer economy once their balance sheets have been tapped out? 

This should not surprise to our readers, given that the "inverted belly" of the Treasury yield curve has already been signaling these concerns.

IX. A Snapshot of Q3 and 9-Month Performance of PSE Listed Banks

Finally, here is a snapshot of the micro aspects of the financials.

Table 7

The performance of PSE-listed banks indicates that while all-bank profits grew by 14% to Php 226 billion in the first nine months of 2024, bills payable jumped by 79%, or Php 579 billion, reaching Php 1.31 trillion. This increase in bills payable signifies more than double the net profits generated over the same period. The data excludes the small-scale Citystate Savings Bank [PSE: CSB]. [Table 7]

PSEi banks accounted for 84% of the nine-month increase in bills, relative to their 73% share of net income growth. Metrobank [PSE: MBT] represented the most aggressive borrower, with a 61% share. 

We have yet to reconcile the stark divergence between the reported BSP bank performance and the aggregate activities of listed firms. 

Nonetheless, through aggressive lending, banks boosted their top and bottom lines in Q3, positively impacting the nine-month performance. 

Fueled by a 29.7% growth in non-PSEi banks, the net income growth of all banks soared by 22%. 

X. Highlights, Summary and Conclusion 

In the end, we can summarize the banking sector as having the following attributes: (as of September or Q3) 

1. all-time highs in:

-Financial Index

-market cap share of the PSEi 30 (3 biggest banks)

-turnover of financial sector to mainboard volume (near)

-nominal or Philippine peso and % share of total financial resources

-nominal net claims on central government

-nominal Held-to-Maturity assets

-total bank lending in Philippine pesos

-percentage share of consumer bank lending

-nominal bank borrowing (mainly Bills)

-nominal repo operations

- nominal net financial assets

2. Historical lows in:

-cash-to-deposits

-production pie of total bank lending

-reserve requirement ratio

3. Declining trend in:

-cash reserves

-profit growth

-deposit growth

-liquid asset-to-deposit ratio

How is it that the supposedly "profitable" financial institutions, supported by the recent slowdown in non-performing loans, have been accompanied by sustained declines in deposit and savings rates, as well as a massive hemorrhage in liquidity that compelled them to rapidly access short-term financing via bills and repos?

Have profits been overstated? Have NPLs been understated?

To what extent have the BSP’s relief measures and subsidies caused distortions in banks’ reporting of their health conditions?

Why the flagrant disconnect between stock prices and the actual conditions of the banks?

Could the "national team" have been tasked with camouflaging recent developments through a panicked pumping of the sector’s shares?

Does the ongoing shortfall in liquidity portend higher rates ahead?

Given all these factors, what could possibly go wrong?

As we recently pointed out,

To be clear, we aren’t suggesting that CBC and other record-setting bank shares, such as BPI, are a simulacrum of Lehman; rather, we are pointing to the distortive behavior of speculative derbies that may hide impending problems in the sector. (Prudent Investor, October 2024)

____

References 

Satyajit Das, Central banks: The legacy of monetary mandarins, New Indian Express, November 15, 2024 

Jean Christine A. Armas, Other Financial Corporations Survey (OFCS): Framework, Policy Implications and Preliminary Groundwork, BSP-Economic Newsletter, July-August 2014, bsp.gov.ph 

Prudent Investor, Q3 2024 5.2% GDP: Consumers Struggle Amid Financial Loosening, PSEi 30 Deviates from the GDP’s Trajectory, November 10, 2024 

Prudent Investor, Important Insights from the Philippine PSEi 30’s Melt-Up! October 7, 2024