Thursday, September 20, 2012

Quote of the Day: China’s Territorial Disputes: Distractions from Homegrown Problems

Well I have been saying that ‘the brouhaha over Asia’s territorial disputes have really been smokescreens.  

Dr. Ed Yardeni sees the same:
image
The Chinese government is picking fights with some of its neighbors over several islands in the South China Sea. These issues have been simmering for a very long time. Why are they coming to a boil now? One possibility is that the Chinese government is stirring up nationalist sentiments to distract the locals from some serious homegrown problems, and doesn't believe that the US will side with Japan and other Asian nations disputing China's territorial claims.
China’s Communist leadership change isn’t going smoothly at the same time that the economy is slowing significantly. For example, electricity output during the three months through August rose only 1.4% y/y. Crude oil demand has flattened out around 9.5mbd over the past six months through August. Fred Smith, the head of FedEx, warned on Tuesday that China watchers may be “completely underestimating” that the export slowdown is more than offsetting attempts by the government to boost growth.
The recent widespread protests in China against Japan’s claims to some of the disputed islands in the South China Sea are already harming the economy. Japanese companies are temporarily closing their manufacturing facilities and retail outlets in China. Trade between China and Japan totaled $323 billion (saar) during August, with China’s exports to Japan at $147 billion and imports from Japan at $176 billion.
China’s Shanghai-Shenzhen 300 stock price index rallied late last week, but now seems to be resuming the downward trend of the past year. The price of copper rebounded smartly last week on news that China will spend to build subways and roads, but could weaken if tensions between China and Japan don’t abate soon. Japan’s Nikkei is also vulnerable to the dispute between the two countries.
The sad part is that the smoke and mirror’s game only worsens the problems

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Bank of Japan Joins ECB-FED: Increases Quantitative Easing by 10 Trillion Yen ($697 Billion)

Having just pointed out how inflationism by both Bank of Japan and China’s PBOC has functioned as a principal unseen causal factor behind Senkaku Islands dispute, here comes another round of easing from Bank of Japan (BoJ)

From Bloomberg,

The Bank of Japan expanded its easing program in an effort to prevent a rising yen from undermining an economic recovery, following measures from the U.S. Federal Reserve last week to stimulate growth.

The central bank increased its asset-purchase fund to 55 trillion yen ($697 billion) from 45 trillion yen and its lending facility was kept at 25 trillion yen, according to a statement released in Tokyotoday. Five of 21 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg News predicted easing while 11 forecast the action by October.

Here is what I recently wrote,

Yet the huge amount of coming infusions from the FED-ECB will likely be complimented by the Bank of England, and Bank of Japan, as well as the Swiss National Bank whom has been the quasi-pioneer implementer of the unlimited option via the Swiss-Franc Euro price cap

This has not been about the rising yen, this has been about political desperation to survive the current crumbling debt based political order.

Inflationism and the Senkaku Islands Dispute

At the Minyanville Jonah Loeb postulates 5 factors behind the intensifying Senkaku Island dispute between Japan and China, particularly history, resources (vast oil reserves), economic stakes, provocation by both governments and impact on US presidential elections.

First below is the an abbreviated timeline of the Senkaku Dispute, the complete timeline can be seen at the Globe and Mail here

-1996: The nationalist group builds another lighthouse on another of the islands. Several activists from Hong Kong dive into waters off the islands on a protest journey. One of them drowns.

- 2002: The Japanese ministry of internal affairs starts renting three of the four Kurihara-owned islands. The other is rented by the defence ministry.

- 2004: A group of Chinese activists lands on one of the disputed islands. The then prime minister Junichiro Koizumi orders their deportation after two days.

- September, 2010: A Chinese fishing boat rams two Japanese coastguard patrol boats off the islands. Its captain is arrested but freed around two weeks later amid a heated diplomatic row that affects trade and political ties.

- April 16, 2012: Tokyo governor Shintaro Ishihara announces he has reached a basic agreement to buy the Kurihara-owned islands.

- July 7, 2012: Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda says his government is considering buying the islands.

- August 15, 2012: Japanese police arrest 14 pro-China activists, five of them on one of the islands.

- August 17, 2012: All 14 are deported.

- August 19, 2012: Japanese nationalists land on the islands without permission.

It is important to point out the current geopolitical troubles on Senkaku essentially got resurrected in 2010-2012 when Japan’s fragile post-Lehman economy got slammed by the triple whammy natural disaster (earthquake, tsunami and nuclear power meltdown) and as China’s economy has turned south in response to the diminishing returns of the 2008-2009 stimulus as shield to the post Lehman crisis.

Meanwhile, the Bank of Japan has resorted to ever increasing amounts of quantitative easing to save the beleaguered crony banking and finance, the nuclear industry and other zombie crony firms.

Yet like the Scarborough-Spratly’s island dispute I do not believe that this has been about history nor has this been about resources, but both ideas have been peddled as popular rationalizations for the standoff.

Jonah Loeb writes,

4. Both countries' governments are being provocative. Tokyo Governor Shoharo Ishihara, an outspoken character with a long history of anti-Chinese comments, sparked the dispute by launching a public fundraiser to buy the islands from their private owners, forcing the Japanese government’s hand as China fought back against Ishihara’s bid…

5. It could have a major effect on the US presidential race. More and more American politicians, especially those on the right, have been spinning some pretty harsh anti-Chinese rhetoric for a while, and that’s only increased since this dispute started. Mitt Romney claims that he will declare China a “currency manipulator” if he’s elected, and China is therefore as suspicious of the United States as it is angry at Japan.

It is true that politicians have been stoking inflammatory statements; a Chinese general recently said that China’s military should “prepare for combat”.

In reality these are most likely smokescreens to the worsening internal problems experienced by both countries and to the mounting interventionism being applied by the increasingly desperate political authorities.

In a speech Professor Joseph T. Salerno made this very important point. (bold highlights mine)

War has a number of advantages for the ruling class. First and foremost, war against a foreign enemy obscures the class conflict that is going on domestically in which the minority ruling class coercively siphons off the resources and lowers the living standards of the majority of the population, who produce and pay taxes. Convinced that their lives and property are being secured against a foreign threat, the exploited taxpayers develop a "false consciousness" of political and economic solidarity with their domestic rulers…

The war rhetoric have been used as opportunity to deflect public opinions to a foreign bogeyman as greater interventionism are being applied to the economy

Again from Professor Salerno

A second advantage of war is that it provides the ruling class with an extraordinary opportunity to intensify its economic exploitation of the domestic producers through emergency war taxes, monetary inflation, conscripted labor, and the like. The productive class generally succumbs to these increased depredations on its income and wealth with some grumbling but little real resistance because it is persuaded that its interests are one with the war makers.

The point being:

We thus arrive at a universal, praxeological truth about war. War is the outcome of class conflict inherent in the political relationship — the relationship between ruler and ruled, parasite and producer, tax-consumer and taxpayer. The parasitic class makes war with purpose and deliberation in order to conceal and ratchet up their exploitation of the much larger productive class. It may also resort to war making to suppress growing dissension among members of the productive class (libertarians, anarchists, etc.) who have become aware of the fundamentally exploitative nature of the political relationship and become a greater threat to propagate this insight to the masses as the means of communication become cheaper and more accessible, e.g., desktop publishing, AM radio, cable television, the Internet, etc. Furthermore, the conflict between ruler and ruled is a permanent condition. This truth is reflected — perhaps half consciously — in the old saying that equates death and taxes as the two unavoidable features of the human condition.

This leads us to central banking inflationism. Today’s interventionism has become more pronounced through central bank inflationism. And war financing has intrinsically been tied with inflationism.

As Mises Institute's founder Lew Rockwell recently wrote

Through this convoluted process – a process, not coincidentally, that the general public is unlikely to know about or understand – the federal government is in fact able to do the equivalent of printing money and spending it. While everyone else has to acquire resources by spending money they earned in a productive enterprise – in other words, they first have to produce something for society, and then they may consume – government may acquire resources without first having produced anything. Money creation via government monopoly thus becomes another mechanism whereby the exploitative relationship between government and the public is perpetuated.

Now because the central bank allows the government to conceal the cost of everything it does, it provides an incentive for governments to engage in additional spending in all kinds of areas, not just war. But because war is enormously expensive and because the sacrifices that accompany it place such a strain on the public, it is wartime expenditures for which the assistance of the central bank is especially welcome for any government.

In short war gives political cover for authorities to inflate the system.

Of course, again as I previously argued, the territorial disputes could be used as an election campaign propaganda.

War has always been used as opportunities to exploit society (through financial repression) and suppress internal political opposition in order to advance the interests of the ruling political class whose interest are interlinked with the politically favored banking class, the welfare and the warfare class.

The Senkaku Island dispute has been no different.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Personal Message: Blogging Lite

Time is gold. That’s because time is the scarcest resource for us. Money can be lost and regained but never for time. Time spent or consumed is sunk cost.

Since my beloved mom and step dad is in town for a vacation and to celebrate birthdays in the family, I will be attending and sharing precious golden moments with them until their vacation schedule ends.

This means less sitting in front of the computer, less research work and importantly less blog posts.

I am unsure if I can make my regular weekly stock market outlook for the next 2 weeks. But it would be best for me to inform you so as you would know what to expect from me.

Thank you for understanding and patronage.

In Liberty,

Benson

Quotes of the Day: How QE ‘Forever’ Represents Regulatory Capture and Crony Capitalism

Both quotes from Randall Holcombe at the Independent Institute

On regulatory capture

The basic logic behind the capture theory of regulation is that while the general public is largely ignorant of the regulator’s activities, those in the regulated industries are well-informed, and pressure regulators for favorable regulation. Furthermore, information about regulated industries is largely under the control of those in the industry, and personal connections between regulators and the regulated also influence regulatory outcomes. The result is that regulatory agencies act as agents for those they regulate, not the general public.

The Federal Reserve Bank’s recent QE3 announcement that they will be buying $40 billion in mortgage-backed securities a month for an indefinite period of time is an excellent example of regulatory capture. Under Chairman Bernanke, the Fed has successfully pushed to increase its regulatory role over the financial industry, and Stigler’s capture theory would predict that the Fed, as a financial regulator, would act to benefit the financial industry it regulates…

Just like the government’s purchase of Chevy Volts, the Fed is creating demand for a product (morgtage-backed securities) that is in weak demand, for the benefit of the industry it regulates.

On Cronyism

The Fed is buying the products of the financial industry—the mortgage-backed securities—just like the Defense Department is buying Volts that are the product of GM. In both cases, the purchases are designed to increase the demand for a product the government wants to support, for the benefit of the producers of the product.

If there are any differences, they are (1) that, as I noted above, the Defense Department may actually have a use for automobiles, but the Fed has no use for mortgage-backed securities, and (2) the scale of the operation. There’s a big difference between a purchase of $60 million in total and on-going purchases of $40 billion a month. So, looking at these two examples, QE3 is much more clearly an example of crony capitalism—designed to benefit cronies in the real estate and financial industries—and QE3 is crony capitalism on a much more massive scale.

Monday, September 17, 2012

Quote of the Day: Economic Value of Politicians

By what insane calculation is a congressional candidate more representative of society than an entrepreneur, a corporate director, or a taxicab driver?

I am sharing Cafe Hayek's Professor Don Boudreaux quote of Steve Landsburg’s 1997 book, Fair Play (original emphasis) page 35

This quote reminds me of a popular and controversial media personality who recently said in a radio show that for a particular case, he only helps retired public officials because they have done “public service” to society and won’t do the same for civilians.

The announcer seem to have forgotten that that the food he eats comes from the private sector, the clothes he wears comes from the private sector, the car he drives comes from the private sector, the mobile phone he uses comes from the private sector, the microphone and sound system he uses to air his self-righteous junk comes from the private sector, the bed he sleeps on comes from the private sector…practically everything he does (directly and indirectly—even government roads may have been subcontracted to the private sector or at least sources their raw materials from the private sector) comes from the private sector which he so belittles.

And what of public officials? Public officials live off from the resources generated by the private sector to supposedly do some “public service” which in reality the private sector can provide. In short, public officials exists because of the private sector from whom the former forcibly extracts resources from the latter.

In the world of politics, what is self-evident can hardly be seen. Moreover, people are seduced to noble sounding economic naiveté themes, as well as, to morally bankrupt idea of collectivism (nationalism) or to the servitude to the state.

India to Open Retail Business

With bad news proliferating out there, this has been a refreshing development: India will open more segment of her economy.

From Bloomberg,

Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has embarked on the biggest gamble of his second term, pushing through policy changes opposed by members of his own coalition as he seeks to revive the economy and the fortunes of his embattled party.

After two years of stalled policy making and amid slumping support, Singh’s Congress party-led cabinet Sept. 14 allowed overseas retailers to enter India, and said foreign airlines can own minority stakes in local carriers. While the second-largest party in the alliance, Trinamool Congress, vowed to take a “drastic step” if Singh, 79, doesn’t abandon the laws and roll back a diesel price increase, opposition lawmakers called for a nationwide strike over policies they say will trigger job losses and hurt the poor.

“Congress has been committing harakiri by doing nothing,” Satish Misra, a political analyst at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi, said by phone yesterday. “They have been pushed around so much that it was time to fight back.”

The architect as finance minister of India’s 1990s economic opening and recently the object of media ridicule, Singh may have judged that rivals unprepared for elections are not likely to try to topple the government, Misra said.

His administration has 18 months until the next election to ease gridlock in Parliament over corruption allegations and restore confidence in its management of an economy growing at near its slowest pace in three years. Warnings of a ratings downgrade to junk status and a 67-percent drop in foreign direct investment in the last quarter are spurring the boldest policy initiatives of a government re-elected in 2009.

Since India joined China to open her economy in the 90s, India’s GDP per capita has ballooned (chart from tradingeconomics.com)

image

So it’s really not a gamble for Mr. Singh. He recognizes the powers of economic liberalization. Instead resistance to change emanates from those entrenched political forces who doesn’t want to lose their privileges through protectionism and cronyism.

They are the same forces whom has been blaming gold imports for so-called trade deficits where in reality gold has become a fall guy for insatiable spending by politicians.

Economic liberalization is the only antidote to vicious central banking policies.

Is a War in the Middle East War Imminent?

Warmongers have thrown up all sorts of excuses to justify military actions in the Middle East. These includes the recent religious bullying (through manipulation of public opinion) that has prompted for a wave of anti-US protests. The US government has reportedly even allied with Al-Qaeda to foment war in Syria, an ally of Iran.

Now drumbeats of war seems to be getting louder.

From the Telegraph,

Battleships, aircraft carriers, minesweepers and submarines from 25 nations are converging on the strategically important Strait of Hormuz in an unprecedented show of force as Israel and Iran move towards the brink of war.

Western leaders are convinced that Iran will retaliate to any attack by attempting to mine or blockade the shipping lane through which passes around 18 million barrels of oil every day, approximately 35 per cent of the world’s petroleum traded by sea.

A blockade would have a catastrophic effect on the fragile economies of Britain, Europe the United States and Japan, all of which rely heavily on oil and gas supplies from the Gulf.

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most congested international waterways. It is only 21 miles wide at its narrowest point and is bordered by the Iranian coast to the north and the United Arab Emirates to the south.

In preparation for any pre-emptive or retaliatory action by Iran, warships from more than 25 countries, including the United States, Britain, France, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, will today begin an annual 12-day exercise.

As American musician and composer Frank Zappa said,

Government is the Entertainment division of the military-industrial complex

Parallel Universe: Singapore Exports Fall, Stock Market Surges

It’s a bizarre world. We seem to live in a “parallel universe” or a separate reality coexisting with one’s own (Wikipedia.org)

On the one hand, you have soaring financial markets.

On the other hand, signs of a staggering real economy have become more evident.

Singapore’s self-contradicting financial markets and the real economy seem like a good example.

From Bloomberg,

Singapore’s exports fell more than economists estimated in August as shipments of electronics dropped and companies sold fewer goods to Europe.

Non-oil domestic exports slid 10.6 percent from a year earlier, after a revised 5.7 percent increase in July, the trade promotion agency said in a statement today. The decline exceeded all 15 estimates in a Bloomberg News survey, where the median was for a 4 percent drop…

Singapore’s electronics shipments by companies such as Venture Corp. fell 11 percent in August from a year earlier, after climbing 2 percent the previous month.

Non-electronics shipments, which include petrochemicals and pharmaceuticals, decreased 10.4 percent. Petrochemicals exports gained 1.3 percent, while pharmaceutical shipments slid 3.2 percent after rising 1.3 percent in July.

Singapore’s non-oil exports fell a seasonally adjusted 9.1 percent last month from July, when they dropped 3.6 percent, today’s report showed.

image

Who says economic growth drives stock market prices? Singapore’s STI has been up an amazing 16.02% year-to-date as of Friday’s close, even as annual economic growth rate has been faltering. (chart from tradingeconomics.com)

Central bank policies have nurtured a parallel universe.

Bernanke’s Open Ended QE: More Property Curbs in Hong Kong

Hong Kong introduces more regulatory property curbs which are indirect form of capital controls.

From Bloomberg,

Hong Kong has widened efforts to cool home prices that have gained almost 90 percent since early 2009, as the U.S. Federal Reserve’s third round of quantitative easing risks fueling asset bubbles in the city.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority will limit the maximum term on all new mortgages to 30 years, Norman Chan, the de-facto central bank’s chief executive, told reporters on Sept. 14. Mortgage payments for investment properties can’t be more than 40 percent of buyers’ monthly incomes, from the current 50 percent, he said.

The curbs came after the Hang Seng Property Index completed a six-day, 11 percent rally on optimism the Fed’s QE3 program would fuel inflows to the city, which tracks U.S. monetary policy because of a currency peg to the dollar. Record low mortgage rates, an influx of buyers from other parts of China and a lack of new supply have underpinned the housing market, prompting Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying to announce plans in the past month to accelerate land sales and give preference to local buyers in some projects.

More:

The introduction of QE3 “will create the potential for renewed influx of capital into Hong Kong,” Chan said. “We have to stand ready for it.”

The central bank also raised the minimum down payment on investment properties for buyers who derive their income from outside Hong Kong. Investors using their assets -- not income -- to borrow can now only take out loans for as much as 30 percent of a property’s value, Chan said. The restrictions are effective immediately.

Inflationism essentially sow the seeds for protectionism through various forms of interventionism as capital controls. On the other hand, protectionism fosters antagonism. Central banking policies, thus, promotes social instability even in what used to be economically free nations.

FED-ECB’s Nuclear Policies: Risk ON is Back!

Congratulations, Mr. Bernanke. I'm happy. My asset values go up but as a responsible citizen I have to say the monetary policies of the U.S. will destroy the world.-Dr. Marc Faber

We have practically reached a virtual denouement phase for central bank communication “inflation expectations” management strategies as well as the penultimate stage for central bank asset-purchasing programs.

“Whatever it takes” to support the incumbent political financial order has been discharged into actual policies.

Last week, the ECB launched its Quantitative Easing (QE) version of unlimited bond buying[1] program. This week, it was the US Federal Reserve’s turn to validate my predictions[2].

Political Desperation Leads to the Nuclear Option

Doing things over and over and expecting different results appears to have reached a culmination point too.

The mainstream has repeatedly argued that central bank policies have not attained the targeted goals because of the supposed insufficiency of the degree of measures undertaken to attain the desired traction. In short, for the interventionists throwing money at the problem has never been enough.

clip_image001

For instance, putting into the limelight the fragility or the resiliency of the current statistical economic recovery of US, the trend of non-participants in the US labor markets has been steadily increasing (upper window blue bar trend). This could mean many factors such as many people may have given up on the search for jobs or that many may have gone into the informal economy or that many could have become dependent on government welfare (lower window exhibits the recent surge in food stamps and disability participants) or a combination of the above. (chart from dshort.com[3])

In addition to this, jobs that have been created has been on a sustained decline even amidst the gamut of credit easing policies, particularly QE 1.0, QE 2.0, Operation Twist and Operation Twist Extension of the US Federal Reserve.

Thus, given the latest policies announced by the FED, as well as the ECB, the efficacies of open ended and unlimited measures will be put under the proverbial microscope.

There will hardly be any further excuses for any subsequent policy mistakes. Proponents of the inflationism appear to have been boxed into a corner.

RISK ON is Back, For Now

The reactivation of the RISK ON environment essentially comes with the German constitutional court’s clearing of the legal hurdle for the European Stability Mechanism (ESM)[4], but with some conditional[5] stipulations* and the US Federal Reserve’s announcement of the nuclear “open ended” MBS buying program.

*The ever changing rules to accommodate these bailouts, I think, will unlikely become a barrier. Central bankers have gradually been assuming the role of politicians. FT columnist Gideon Rachman captures the zeitgeist best[6]

As a result of the ECB’s actions, voters from Germany to Spain will increasingly find that crucial decisions about national economic policy can no longer be changed at the ballot box.

In the Q & A portion of the post-FOMC announcement, US Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke unreservedly expressed that these policies had been intended to boost prices of financial assets in order to stimulate the “wealth effect” demand-driven spending[7] or Mr. Bernanke’s financial accelerator.

The tools we have involve affecting financial asset prices. Those are the tools of monetary policy. There are a number of different channels. Mortgage rates, other rates, I mentioned corporate bond rates. Also the prices of various assets. For example, the prices of homes. To the extent that the prices of homes begin to rise, consumers will feel wealthier, they’ll begin to feel more disposed to spend. If home prices are rising they may feel more may be more willing to buy home because they think they’ll make a better return on that purchase. So house prices is one vehicle. Stock prices – many people own stocks directly or indirectly. The issue here is whether improving asset prices will make people more willing to spend. One of the main concerns that firms have is that there is not enough demand…if people feel their financial position is better they’ll be more likely to spend….

Despite the economic justification which have been premised on popular economic fallacy, from where stones can be turned into bread through inflationism, Mr. Bernanke’s decision to trigger the nuclear option which validated my prediction, has been mainly about

1) funding the US budget deficits (what I called in the past as “poker bluff” or the propaganda that FED won’t do a QE[8]),

2) the fulfillment of the perpetual promises to stimulate (where a failed expectation would have meant a violent backlash), and

I wrote[9],

Mounting expectations and deepening dependence from central banking opiate, which has been clashing with the unfolding economic reality, will prompt for more price volatility on both directions. The Bank of America posits that QE 3.0 has been substantially priced in.

Eventually stock markets will either reflect on economic reality or that central bankers will have to relent to the market’s expectations. Otherwise fat tail risks may also become a harsh reality.

3) Importantly, Mr. Bernanke’s implied support for the re-election of the President Obama, which ensures his tenure as Chairman of the US Federal Reserve[10].

Yet while it has been true that a huge amount of stimulus have been priced into the markets, the Fed’s extension of the zero bound rates through 2015 and the open ended $40 billion monthly purchases of mortgage bonds combined with the existing $267 Operation Twist have been aggressively beyond expectations of the marketplace.

So the initial impact of the FED-ECB policies to subsidize financial assets represents attained its short term goal, they succeeded to inflate asset prices first.

clip_image003

Steroid dependent global equity markets were in revelry as the FED-ECB programs were made public.

Most of the global markets surged. Among the major benchmarks, the BRICS (except for China) posted the biggest gains while the rest of the developed economies, along with, the ASEAN majors scored substantial weekly advances of over 1%.

clip_image004

In the US market breadth turned substantially positive 84% of stocks soared above the 50-day moving averages[11] while Advance Decline ratio decidely went for the bulls[12]

clip_image005

The unveiling of the joint central bank nuclear policies also resulted to a huge rally in the bonds of distressed nations as Spain and Italy. Yields fell hard as bond vigilantes were beaten back by the ECB’s actions (chart from Dankse Research[13])

And as expected, rallying bond prices have reduced pressures on politicians of the criss stricken nations as Spain, to underake required reforms.

Spain’s prime minister, Mariano Rajoy, according to a news report[14], said last week that “he won’t allow the European Union or the ECB to stipulate how the nation narrows its budget deficit as a condition for buying the country’s bonds”.

So the ECB’s asset purchases have only increased the moral hazard aspects in the behavior of politicians. Efforts to redress such the imbalances that caused the crisis will likely be delayed. Instead of the ECB buying time for politicians to commence on reforms, the ECB has become THE tool for EU’s politicians to do the latter’s bidding.

The risk on rally has also diffused into global corporate bond markets.

In the US, a surge in corporate bond issuance has prompted yields on speculative-grade debt to drop to an unprecedented low, which according to Bloomberg, breaks the previous record set more than 15 months ago[15].

Unintended Consequences of the FED-ECB policies

clip_image006

In spite of all the euphoria, the FED’s operations may likely be reaching a tipping point.

The combined monthly $40 billion MBS purchases by US Federal Reserve, as well as, the $45 billion long term (10-30 year) US treasury bond buying from Operation Twist means that the Fed’s balance sheet is likely to expand to about $4 trillion by the end of 2013 from $ 2.8 trillion or an increase of about $1.17 trillion, according to Zero Hedge[16].

Yet the sterilization measures by Operation Twist of selling $45 in short term bonds to offset the long end buying will likely end by this year as the Fed runs out of short term securities to sell.

Essentially, roughly half of the US budget deficit will be monetized by the FED. Also the FED’s buying operations will accrue to about 24% of the GDP (see chart above)

Moreover, since the FED holds about $843 billion of Agency MBS[17], the open ended MBS purchases will extrapolate to expansion of the FED’s share of ownership of the entire mortgage market to about 33%, again according to the estimates of Bank of America BofA cited by Zero Hedge[18].

In addition the bond purchasing program means that ownership share of the FED “across the 6y-30y portion Treasury curve is likely to reach about 50% by end of 2013 and an average of 65% by end of 2014”, where “in just over two years the Federal Reserve will hold two thirds of the entire bond market with a maturity over 5 years” again according to the calculation of the BofA.

The FIRST point being that FED’s buying program may end up with FED owning a very large segment, if not all, of both the Agency MBS and the US Treasuries and may run out of bonds to buy to pursue their asset purchases.

Of course they can always resort to buying equities (similar to Bank of Japan[19]) and corporate bonds. But as appropriately pointed out by the only dissenting voice at the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) Jeffrey Lacker of the Richmond Federal Reserve, this would be unethical[20].

Channeling the flow of credit to particular economic sectors is an inappropriate role for the Federal Reserve.

In the world of politics, moral relativism belongs to those in power.

Also the NEXT point is that these combined policies will usher in a high period of Price inflation. Aggressive expansion of money through QE will eventually filter into the economic system.

Even from the monetarist perspective, particularly the Philip Cagan model which according to Professor Garrett Jones[21] states that Today's price level depends mostly on the future supply of money”, the communication to the public of the FED and the ECB’s combined programs should imply for higher price levels than today.

Yet the huge amount of coming infusions from the FED-ECB will likely be complimented by the Bank of England, and Bank of Japan, as well as the Swiss National Bank whom has been the quasi-pioneer implementer of the unlimited option via the Swiss-Franc Euro price cap[22]

Seminal Signs of a Crack-UP Boom?

clip_image008

The recent strong performance of commodities may have altered balance between the recently outperforming stock market (S&P 500) and commodity prices (CCI or the CRB Reuters Index).

Commodities could be in a major inflection point relative to the stock market.

The same dynamics seems are being channeled into the currency markets.

It would be a mistake to see a rallying euro as a sign of “progress”. The rallying euro has been a manifestation of the obvious shift to a RISK ON environment through massive central bank manipulations.

As Doug Noland of the Credit Bubble Bulletin rightly points out[23]

I’ll state what others hesitate to admit: this week our central bank took a giant leap from radical to virtual rogue central banking. If Bernanke’s plan was to leapfrog the audacious Draghi ECB, our sinking currency – even against the euro – is confirmation of his success. If his goal was to provide markets a Benjamin Strong-like “coup de whiskey” – he should instead fear the dangerous instability central bankers have wrought on global markets and economies.

It would also be oversimplistic and misguided to see strengthening currencies as tempering “price inflation”.

In a world of fiat currencies and globalization, strengthening currencies could be a sign of a bubble in progress rather than of a structural advancement

The chart above shows that the race to devalue through unlimited or open ended QEs between Fed’s Bernanke and ECB’s Draghi have been transmitted through a rally in commodities priced in the US dollar (CCI:USD) and the Euro (CCI:XEU).

Put differently, both currencies, the US dollar and the Euro, have now been devaluing against the broad based benchmark of commodities. In the Austrian school of economics, these could signify as seminal signs of a crack-up boom

And contra mainstream empirical analysts, we must be reminded that the valuation of a monetary unit, according to the great Ludwig von Mises[24], depends not on the wealth of a country, but rather on the relationship between the quantity of, and demand for, money. Thus, even the richest country can have a bad currency and the poorest country a good one

A good example seems to be Brazil’s real. The real has firmed against the US dollar since 2008 post Lehman debacle (yahoo chart left window).

clip_image009

The supposed leakage from the sterilzation process from Brazil’s huge foreign reserve accumulation—where government bonds issued by Brazil’s central bank to sterilize foreign exchange purchases, has been used as collateral by banks to issue debt thereby expanding their balance sheets—has fueled a credit boom in Brazil’s economy. Claims on government have skyrocketed in 2011 as the real soared (right window).

The Brazilian government recently tried to curb through a series of tightening via interest rate hikes which may have prompted for the recent economic weakening.

The recent economic boom which could have been orchestrated through a covert quantitative easing scheme by Brazil’s central bank has been questioned by Jonathan Wheatley at the Financial Times blog[25] as a possible product of a central bank fueled boom-bust cycle.

Have inflows, then, been driving Brazil’s credit boom – and has the government been guilty of quantitative easing? It is hard to explain the expansion of credit from about R$500bn in 2005 to about R$2.2tn today on the basis of economic growth alone. Over that period, GDP growth has averaged 4 per cent a year – hardly a Chinese performance.

If quantitative easing really is the answer, it doesn’t just put the Brazilian government’s account of its monetary policies in question. It questions the basis of the whole Brazilian growth story.

By the way, Brazil’s government has recently joined the stimulus bandwagon with a $66 billion infrastructure stimulus[26].

The point being: In a world where central banks compete to destroy their currencies through devaluation, rising currencies may signify as symptoms of relative devaluation and they could also mask the bubble policies that underpins the statistical economic growth.

clip_image010

It would also be an error to likewise view rallying commodities signs of economic recovery, China who plays a major role in the commodity business, seems to be struggling from a bubble bust.

Despite the recent announcement of what seems as a reluctant and limited bailout program through infrastructure spending and through extension of bank loans to state owned enterprises, the deteriorating conditions of China’s shadow banking system[27] seems to be worsening. In addition, China’s oil imports continue to plummet[28] which is most likely a manifestation of a rapidly slowing economy.

Where commodities rise against a broad spectrum of fiat currencies, then this should be a cause of concern as they could be symptoms of the transition to a crack-up boom.

Again the from great Professor von Mises[29]:

But the boom cannot continue indefinitely. There are two alternatives. Either the banks continue the credit expansion without restriction and thus cause constantly mounting price increases and an ever-growing orgy of speculation, which, as in all other cases of unlimited inflation, ends in a “crack-up boom” and in a collapse of the money and credit system. Or the banks stop before this point is reached, voluntarily renounce further credit expansion and thus bring about the crisis. The depression follows in both instances.

FED-ECB Policy Impact on Asia, Philippine Peso and the Phisix

Asian currencies have rallied strongly in response to the FED-ECB easing programs.

clip_image011

While Asian currencies have been on an upswing from previous pledges to inflate since June, as shown by the JP Morgan Bloomberg ADXY[30] Asian basket of currency index (upper window), the biggest of the advances came from last week (lower window).

The Philippine Peso has been slightly up by .6% to 41.42 a US dollar from 41.68 last week but has strong year to date gains of 5.5%--in harmony with the scintillating gains of the local equity market.

clip_image013

I believe that the interim response from the FED-ECB policies, designed to prop up financial assets, will likely provide strong support to the global stock markets including the Philippine Phisix perhaps until the yearend, at least.

The mining index, which has underperformed all sectors, will likely expunge its year to date losses at least by the yearend.

The mining index will likely retake command of the leadership in 2013 as it has outperformed biyearly since 2007[31].

In a world where central bank policies become the dominant factor in establishing price levels, the new normal is to expect dramatic price swings in both directions and of the amplification of risks

Former Federal Reserve Governor Kevin Warsh in a recent CNBC interview nails it[32].

If you continue to look at the markets right now, where asset prices continue to melt up where asset prices are driven less by fundamentals in particular companies and more by speeches and policies come out of Washington you are taking this risks. Risk are highest in the economy when measures of risk ARE lowest, when I look at the VIX at this level and you compare that to the headlines you guys read every morning they certainly do not seem in sync that’s when shocks happen

But given the projected substantial infusion of steroids, the current environment strongly favors an upswing. That’s until real problems will resurface such as concerns over the quality of credit, and or price inflation becomes more pronounced and or if politics becomes an obstacle to the central banks inflationism and or a combination of the above.

And since no trend goes in a straight line where I expect some interim reprieve from the bullish momentum, I would use any interim corrections as opportunity to position on resource issues.

No Justification for Bubbles

As a final note the FED-ECB policies will affect Asian economies and markets immensely as I have discussed before[33].

These policies will likely incentivize strong capital flows into the region, as investors “search for yields” or seek refuge to protect their savings from deliberate and sustained currency debasement—in reality these accounts for as the capital flight dynamic.

Capital inflows coupled with domestic negative real rates regime will likely translate into serial bubble blowing dynamics.

So yes, the risks of bubbles in Asia will become more enhanced. Even the local central bank or the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) has recently acknowledged of such risks[34] which they arrogantly claim they can control.

In addition, domestic and global bubbles will increase the risks of a global stagflation which is likely slam emerging markets harder.

The risks of ballooning bubble or stagflation will likely become evident in 2013-2014.

Yet the idea that bubbles are good for Asia emanates from a warped, demented and disoriented understanding of economic reality and theories.

Costs are not benefits. What seem as the illusion of progress through asset price inflation has in reality been transfers of resources from the rest of society to the owners of financial assets (stocks bonds and property).

The benefits which accrue to these politically privileged sectors do not take into account the social and economic costs of these transfers[35].

Bailouts benefit the rich at the expense of the poor. Rampant speculations fueled by inflationism are not productive undertaking which adds to products and services to the society. Addiction to debt for speculation or for consumption leads to bankruptcy. The shrinkage of purchasing power of the currency through price inflation hurts the middle class and the poor most.

clip_image015

Misallocated capital cannot be seen as “benefits” since at the end of the cycle, misdirected capital will be exposed as wasted or consumed capital through a bubble bust or a financial crisis. In short, boom bust cycles destroy capital, lowers society’s standard of living or impoverishes people.

The Asian crisis of 1997 as a consequence of the prior inflation boom reveals of how Thailand’s GDP per capita[36] fell by 66% and only recovered when imbalances were allowed to clear. It took roughly 10 years for Thailand’s per capita GDP to recover the high of 1996.

Myopic thinking that mistakes symptoms as causes and that promotes short term ‘benefits’ at the expense of long term ‘costs’ is very unhelpful and will not help produce better returns.


[1] See ECB’s Mario Draghi Unleashes “Unlimited Bond Buying” Bazooka, Fed’s Ben Bernanke Next? September 7, 2012

[2] See I Told You So Moment: US Fed’s Bernanke Unveils Open Ended QE 3.0 Bazooka September 14, 2012

[3] Lance Roberts QE3 And Bernanke's Folly - Part I Advisor Perspectives dshort.com September 14,2012

[4] See German Court Clears Way for ESM Fund, September 12, 2012

[5] OpenEurope.org.uk What will the German Constitutional Court ruling mean for the eurozone? September 12, 2012

[6] Gideon Rachman Democracy loses in struggle to save euro Financial Times September 10, 2012

[7] Cullen Roche A Disturbing Look Inside the Mind of Ben Bernanke, Pragmatic Capitalism, September 13, 2012

[8] See Poker Bluff: No Quantitative Easing 3.0? June 5, 2011

[9] See Phisix: Why The Correction Cycle Is Not Over Yet September 2, 2012

[10] See Phisix: The Correction Cycle is in Motion August 27, 2012

[11] Bespokeinvest.com Breadth Breakout? September 14, 2012

[12] Bespokeinvest.com Breadth Finally Makes a Higher High September 13, 2012

[13] Danske Research The Fed takes a major step forward, September 14, 2012

[14] San Francisco Chronicle European Stocks Fall on Concern Spain, German May Harm ECB Plan September 11, 2012

[15] Bloomberg.com Corporate Bond Sales in U.S. Busiest in Six Months as Fed Acts September 14, 2012

[16] Zero Hedge The Fed's Balance At The End Of 2013: $4 Trillion September 3, 2012

[17] Zero Hedge Rosenberg: "If The US Is Truly Japan, The Fed Will End Up Owning The Entire Market" September 14, 2012

[18] Zero Hedge, BofA Sees Fed Assets Surpassing $5 Trillion By End Of 2014... Leading To $3350 Gold And $190 Crude September 14, 2012

[19] See Bank of Japan Hearts the Stock Market May 08, 2012

[20] See Quote of the Day: Dissenting Opinion on Open Ended QE at the FOMC September 16, 2012

[21] Garett Jones Future money and today's NGDP Econolog September 14, 2012

[22] See Swiss National Bank’s Currency Interventions Spawns Property Bubble August 14, 2012

[23] Doug Noland QE Forever Credit Bubble Bulletin Prudentbear.com September 14, 2012

[24] Ludwig von Mises CHAPTER 1—STABILIZATION OF THE MONETARY UNIT —FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF THEORY (1923) The Causes of Economic Crisis p.18 Mises.org

[25] Jonathan Weathley Quantitative easing, Brazilian style Beyond BRICs September 10, 2012 Financial Times Blog

[26] See Brazil’s Government Unveils $66 Billion Stimulus August 16, 2012

[27] See More Signs that China’s $2.4 Trillion Shadow Banking System is in Big Trouble September 14, 2012

[28] Zero Hedge Chinese Crude Imports Plunge To Mid-2010 Levels September 11, 2012

[29] Ludwig von Mises, III. INFLATION AND CREDIT EXPANSION, Interventionism An Economic Analysis

[30] Bloomberg.com JP Morgan Bloomberg Asian Dollar Index ADXY

[31] See Graphic of the PSE’s Sectoral Performance: Mining Sector and the Rotational Process July 10, 2011

[32] See Video: Former Fed Governor on Bernanke’s QE: Unproven Experiment , Risks of Exit have to be Higher September 15, 2012

[33] See The Impact of Open Ended QEs on Asia: Bubbles or Stagflation September 15, 2012

[34] See Fatal Conceit: Philippine Authorities to Avert Asset Bubbles September 10, 2012

[35] See Inflationism Promotes Inequality, Immorality and Economic Hardship September 15, 2012

[36] KNOEMA.com GDP per Capita by Country Thailand