Video: Murray Rothbard on Understanding Libertarianism

(hat tip Bob Wenzel)

Surprise, Manny Pacquiao is Human

Veteran sport analyst and commentator Ronnie Nathanielsz finally awakens to reality and asked the right question “Is Pacquiao Slowing Down”

Mr. Nathanielsz at yahoo.com

As we cautioned some years ago, the late nights, the drinking and gambling would eventually take its toll on Pacquiao's physical condition and when the effects of abuse of a person's body and the effects of dissipation set in, it often happens abruptly.

A careful review of the fight tape shows Pacquiao has lost a split second in terms of speed, which both Arum and trainer Freddie Roach long pointed to as a key factor in Pacquiao's arsenal which effectively accentuated his power.

"Speed kills" was what Arum pointed to before Pacquiao pulverized De La Hoya that saw him quit on his stool at the end of the seventh round.

That speed has diminished as Pacquiao nears his 34^th birthday on December 17, and as we assess his diminishing assets of speed and devastating power we need to accept the reality that the passing of the summers inevitably takes its toll on even the finest, relentlessly hardworking athlete who walked through the doors of Roach's Wild Card Gym in Los Angeles in the first week of June 2001, eleven long years ago. The innumerable fights, the punches he has taken, the burdens of training and the demands on his time as a congressman, a crossover superstar, a TV personality and a caring human being not to mention his former wild and wooly ways have surely taken their toll and its time we admit it, although such an admission doesn't mitigate the high crime committed in Las Vegas last June 9.

Let us put in a simple way: Contrary to popular expectations, Manny Pacquiao is just human. Yes read my lips, human. Mortal. Not superman. Yes, he susceptible to physiological ageing as anyone else.

Even if Mr. Pacquiao did away with gambling, drinking or late night escapades during his early years, unless technology will save the day, age will function as Manny’s neutralizing factor. This exempts no one, not even priests, monks or other vice free celibates.

You can go to the Boxing Hall of Fame and examine one by one and determine the median, if not the average age, when these former boxing legends had their career inflection point or when they retired.

That’s where the legendary Manny Pacquiao is today.

In the past, most of Pacquiao’s scintillating or brilliant victories came at the expense of OLDER boxers as noted I here. That cycle has turned.

Mr. Pacquiao will now wear the shoes of his former older opponents as most of his contemporaries have hanged up their gloves. So he will be faced with YOUNGER boxers even if he wins against Tim Bradley in a return bout.

The point is the more Pacquiao fights, the lesser the chances of his victory. Of course, this comes in the condition that he duels with younger foes with world class caliber.

And if he insist on staying on the ring, we should expect that after 3-4 more bouts (assuming 2 fights a year), the chances of losing badly (by KO or TKO) will become very significant. And that's when reality will sink in to him (that's if he remains stubborn to pursue more ring engagements)

So while relative age matter, a boxer’s career cycle has even more impact.

In economics, this is merely called the law of diminishing returns.

The law of diminishing returns based on the physiological ageing process has brought upon the twilight of Mr. Pacquiao’s boxing career.

Truth hurts. But that’s how nature works.

Deal with it.

Shelve the Greece Moment; Greeks are Pro-Austerity After All

We had been repeatedly told (if not lied to) by media and neoliberals that Greeks has been anti-bailout.

The election nears conclusion and the results run opposite to what has been bruited.

From Bloomberg,

New Democracy won 130 seats in the 300-seat parliament, according to Interior Ministry projections with almost 90 percent of the vote counted. Pasok, which has alternated in power with New Democracy over the past four decades, won 33 seats, enough to forge a coalition that backs the creditors’ austerity demands.

Syriza Demands

Syriza matched its second-place ranking of last month by stepping up demands to abandon the fiscal-tightening program.

Alexis Tsipras, the head of eight-year-old Syriza, had vowed to keep Greece in the euro while winning concessions on the rescue terms from European leaders including German Chancellor Angela Merkel. He said New Democracy and Pasok, which united last year to back further fiscal tightening by a caretaker government, had “lowered the Greek flag and surrendered it to Angela Merkel.”

Tsipras signaled yesterday that Syriza won’t join a government with New Democracy and Pasok, saying his faction “will be present in all developments as the main voice of the anti-bailout vote in Greece.”

With 166 out of 300 or a 55% vote (New Democracy and Pasok) for the pro-austerity camp, reality finally trumped fiction. The victory cannot be considered as marginal in race among about 8 political parties, namely, New Democracy, Syriza, Pasok Party, Independent Greeks, Golden Dawn, Democratic Left, Communist Party and Ecologist Greens

This squares with accounts of capital flight and resistance to pay taxes (mostly in reaction fears over a Greece exit) which implied that Greeks did not want to exit the EU. This has also been consistent with earlier polls which indicated that a vast majority of Greeks wanted to remain part of the EU.

Demonstrated preference prevails over statist canard.

Only in the eyes of neoliberals and rabid inflationistas, who salivate for massive devaluation as panacea to social ills, has reality been skewed. So there is no Greece moment for now.

The Greece pro-austerity victory does not diminish the crisis. As earlier explained, Greece in or out of the EU will mean inflationism. The difference lies on who will do the inflating. What the pro-austerity victory does is to simply buy off time with the ECB functioning as the main bridge financier, but whose costs will be borne mostly by the Germans overtime. For as long as strong parasitical relationships remain in place, and without real reforms, this crisis will continue.

Greece will now form a government. The ECB should be expected to unveil another region-wide monetary rescue program and perhaps cut interest rates. One thorn has been temporarily taken out. The next is to wait for the announcement of concrete measures from major central banks not limited to the ECB.

With fears of an exit diminished, capital flight in the crisis affected EU nations will likely ease. This would have an impact on the monetary systems of many economies who functioned as shock absorbers. Volatility remains.

Greece’s real reform must be made through economic freedom, not from the illusion of having to turn economic knobs and shower money to the public from helicopters as elixir to economic woes as recommended by experts trying to get social plaudits.

What to Expect from a Greece Moment

The economist must deal with doctrines, and not with men. It is for him to critique errant doctrine; it is not his charge to uncover the personal motives behind heterodoxy. The economist must face his opponents under the fictitious assumption that they are guided by objective considerations alone. It is irrelevant whether the advocate of a false notion acts in good or bad faith; what matters is if the stated notion is true or false. It is the charge of others to reveal corruption and enlighten the public concerning the same Ludwig von Mises, Memoirs p.40

For some, today’s Greece elections serve as the defining ‘Greece moment’ of the Euro crisis. This would seem like a paradise for the advocates of drachmaisation or the return to the local currency, drachma which enables domestic governments to inflate the system.

Yet whether Greece decides to stay within, or departs from the EU, there won’t likely be significant changes in the dominant policies espoused by policymakers in addressing this crisis.

Inflationistas have been drooling for the aggressive use of monetary inflation as the easy way out of the crisis.

The difference would be that of the policy responses by global authorities as consequence of the political choice made by Greeks.

Uncertainty from the resultant political actions will establish the feedback loop between policy responses to the market’s reaction and market’s reaction to policy responses. That’s why policymakers have incessantly talking about erecting firewalls. Spain’s recent bailout has reportedly been predicated against contagion risks[1] from today’s election.

Utopian False Choice

Inflationistas give us a proposition based on a false choice/ false dilemma[2], analyst John Mauldin[3], a populist, gives a good example

Europe is down to two choices. Either allow the eurozone to break up or go for a full fiscal union with central budget controls. The latter option ultimately means eurobonds and a central taxing authority.

If only the world have been that simple where people think alike, move and act alike and economies are mechanized that can be switched on and off or modulated like temperature gauge of an air conditioning unit. Or that people’s actions can be captured in aggregate numbers.

Yet if this is true, then we won’t be having today’s crisis at all.

As the great F.A. Hayek once warned against utopian thinking[4]

it is probably no exaggeration to say that economics developed mainly as the outcome of the investigation and refutation of successive Utopian proposals—if by ‘Utopian’ we mean proposals for the improvement of undesirable effects of the existing system, based upon a complete disregard of those forces which actually enabled it to work.

The false dilemma presented to us fails to take to account the micro conditions of what plagues the EU crisis affected nations.

This vignette of the Greece government, which has been drawn by a Greek public servant and labeled as macaroni, which I earlier posted on my blog[5], has illustrative been of the anatomy of the Europe’s crisis.

The public servant Mr. Panagiotis Karkatsoulis, who works in the Greek Ministry of Administrative Reform and e-Governance and teaches at the National School of Public Administration, has partly been accurate in the dissection of the origins of crisis, particularly, “More than 30 years of scant coordination has resulted in a morass of contradictory rules and a lack of legal clarity” and “the first government of George Papandreou in 2009 had 15 ministers, 9 vice-ministers and 21 adjunct ministers, along with 78 general or special secretaries, 1,200 counselors, 149 directorate generals and 886 directorates — this for a population of just over 11 million, or the same number of people as those living in Cuba. The resulting mesh of interdependencies for decision making has made governing Greece increasingly difficult”.

So Europe’s fundamental problems can be summarized into the following: mishmash of ambiguous, unenforceable and conflicting arbitrary rules and regulations, bloated bureaucracy, unsustainable welfare state, obscure property rights, politically restrained markets through various interventionist policies and high tax rates[6], and a public sector far larger than the private sector, which has been draining away resources from the private sector, as evidenced by Greece’s consumption economy despite relative lower nominal wages or earnings[7] compared to other developed EU nations. As a side note, the perceived or expected cost of labor has been higher in most crisis affected nations in Europe due to stringent labor regulations and bubble policies[8].

In short, Greece’s economy has survived on a parasitical relationship where unproductive sectors have essentially been draining out resources from the depleted hosts.

Devaluation, thus, will not solve the problem of SOLVENCY, PRODUCTIVITY and COMPETITIVENESS as inflation only destroys real savings and extinguishes purchasing power.

Greece’s problem has not been prompted for by rigidity in wages emanating from market forces, but from the rigidity of her incumbent POLITICAL system. Politics simply won’t allow markets to do what the market does best. And obsession to politics is the price paid through a crisis.

As previously discussed, accelerating capital flight has been spawned by the sustained barrage for the siren song of the devaluation elixir as advocated by the political order and their Keynesian protégés, most of whom ironically are residents outside these crisis affected nations.

It’s easy to make recommendations that don’t affect one’s interests or where errant endorsements don’t have a direct personal impact.

The capital flight in the crisis affected EU nations has accounted for as symptoms of savers and creditors who seek refuge out of their nations (again to preserve savings) as well as risks of a banking collapse, while debtors have practically deferred on making payments, possibly in anticipation that their debts would be best paid on a devalued currency.

Also capital controls[9] from the elevated risk of a potential exit has likely been seen as a consequential threat.

All these, including tax increases, negative interest rates, price controls, inflationism and various regulatory proscriptions, are financial repression measures undertaken by desperate governments and endorsed by their institutional apologists who seek to persecute and expropriate assets of their private sector constituents in order to sustain the privileges of the political elite.

Add to these the rising incidence of protectionism[10] which mostly emanated from developed nations, particularly the EU.

So Keynesian (and Fisherian) snake oil prescriptions has essentially backfired or produced a series of unintended consequences. Aside from capital flight, falling tax receipts (including Italy[11]) and a breakdown of trade has been intensifying the crisis[12].

Also fiscal and political union naively extends the problem of the tenuous parasitical relationship. Eventually new hosts or EU’s creditor nations as Germany, Finland, Netherland and the others will also get drained by such unproductive and unsustainable redistributive relationships.

Fund manager John Hussman makes a great analogy of mainstream’s foolish ideas which he analogizes as the “WarrenBonds”[13],

This is like 9 broke guys walking up to Warren Buffett and proposing that they all get together so each of them can issue "Warrenbonds." About 90% of the group would agree on the wisdom of that idea, and Warren would be criticized as a "holdout" to the success of the plan. You'd have 9 guys issuing press releases on their "general agreement" about the concept, and in his weaker moments, Buffett might even offer to "study" the proposal. But Buffett would never agree unless he could impose spending austerity and nearly complete authority over the budgets of those 9 guys. None of them would be willing to give up that much sovereignty, so the idea would never get off the ground. Without major steps toward fiscal union involving a substantial loss of national sovereignty, the same is true for Eurobonds.

Even if 9 broke guys accedes to give up on their sovereignty, for as long as the structural system of parasitical relationship remains, even Warren Buffett will see his resources dwindle and will go bankrupt.

In short, all sorts of proposed and implemented bailout mechanisms—banking union, Eurobonds, EU regional deposit guarantee schemes, European Stability Mechanism and or the European Financial Stability Fund (“EFSF”), Securities Markets Programme (SMP), Long Term Refinancing Operations (LTRO) and Target2—are essentially transfers of resources from productive to unproductive nations, which ensures capital consumption and the eventual demise of the Union.

Of course what exponents of inflationism via devaluation don’t see or refuses to see are that there are other practical market based options such as outright default or restructuring and ‘shock liberalization’[14] as coined by University of Chicago Professor John Cochrane, viz., liberalize economy, allow banks to fail, reduce government spending (by cutting down the bureaucracy and repealing unnecessary regulations), reduce tax rates and sell state assets or privatization.

Whatever the outcome of today’s election, the crisis will continue to linger and will most likely fester for as long as solvency, productivity and competitiveness issues will not addressed by giving the private sector a bigger hand.

Exploring the Greece Moment

A Greece vote to stay within the EU will likely have concerted efforts by the European Central Bank (ECB) to reflate the system backed by some superficial ‘austerity’ policies. This will be another attempt to delay the day of reckoning.

This will likely another incite short term upswing for the markets but eventually will wear off, as with all the rest.

In short, boom bust cycles until the grand finale: defaults either by massive inflation (which likely brings the end of the euro experiment) or by outright default (disunion may or may not happen).

A Greece vote out of the EU to may spell interim trouble for the global markets, but this would likely prompt central banks to collaborate by massively inflating the system. So volatility can swing fiercely from downside to upside and vice versa, depending on how large these actions will be.

I would make another guess. Under the conditions where global central banks steps on the proverbial pedal to the metal, the RISK ON RISK OFF environment will probably transition to a stagflationary environment[15] (slow economic growth, high unemployment but also high consumer price inflation).

Again this will be conditional or mainly dependent on the scale or degree of actions which is something cannot be foreseen. I have to admit I don’t have telephatic powers that would allow me to read the minds of central bankers.

Yet under a stagflationary setting, market’s attention may likely be focused on commodities as inflation hedges.

And that’s where I’d be.

---

[1] Bloomberg.com Euro Bloc Faces Greek Vote Giving First Spanish Test, June 11, 2012

[2] Wikipedia.org False dilemma

[3] Mauldin John MAULDIN: The 'Bang!' Moment Is Here Businessinsider.com, June 16, 2012

[4] Hayek Friedrich von Four History And Politics The Trend Of Economic Thinking p.15 libertarianismo.org

[5] See Chart of the Day: Greece’s ‘Macaroni’ Bureaucracy, June 15, 2012

[6] Wikipedia.org Tax rates of Europe

[7] Eurostat Wages and labour costs European Commission

[8] See Germany’s Competitive Advantage over Spain: Freer Labor Markets May 25, 2012

[9] See The Coming Age of Capital Controls? June 13, 2012

[10] See More Wall of Worry: Rising Accounts of Protectionism June 15, 2012

[11] See Italy’s Pro-Growth Tax Increases Backfires, June 13, 2012

[12] See Is Greece Falling into a Failed State?, May 28, 2012

[13] Hussman John P. The Reality of the Situation, May 28, 2012 Hussmanfunds.com

[14] Cochrane John H. Euro explosion, June 15, 2012

[15] Investopedia.com Stagflation

Dealing with Today’s Uncertainty: Patience is the Better Part of Valor

Highly volatile markets will be the outcome of today’s treacherous geopolitical conditions. That’s what I have been saying all along.

Volatility in Both Directions but with a Downside Bias

So far my perspective has been continually confirmed: volatility on both directions with a downside bias, especially for the Phisix.

A week ago, the Phisix got slammed early but the bulls worked their way to cover on the lost ground, and by the end of the week, losses had been trimmed to less than half[1].

The opposite scenario occurred this week: the Phisix had a strong opening carried mostly by the initial torrent from Spain’s bailout, but bulls eventually succumbed to the bears by the week’s close.

Technically speaking, in spite of all the volatility, the Phisix has been rangebound.

Volatility has been global.

In seeming defiance of gravity where bad news conventionally extrapolates to lower markets, today, bad news IS good news.

It is ironic to see central bankers scream for blood[2], yet global equity markets trekked higher. That’s because market participants have been conditioned to the Bernanke Put or expectations that central bankers, led by the US Federal Reserve, will like a knight in shining armor, ride to the rescue.

News of the $125 billion Spanish bailout prompted for a one day euphoria which quickly faded. It was evident that markets saw through the flaws of the proposed bailout[3]. However as the week progressed, the spate of bad news gave way to intensifying speculations, which has been further fuelled by promises[4] of renewed interventions by central bankers.

Except for ASEAN bourses which posted mixed showing, major global indices registered modest to significant gains over the week.

China’s Loan Growth and Chart Patterns

China’s loans unexpectedly jumped in May, according to news reports[5]. This has prompted the Shanghai index to post a modest advance of 1.13% over the week.

Most of the growth in China’s credit markets seems to have been driven by State Owned Enterprises (SOE). This means that China may have embarked on a furtive state based stimulus rather than a nationwide program.

Unfortunately SOE’s which have played a prominent role in the expansion of China’s highly fragile shadow banking system and which has already been encumbered by questionable loans, may have limited actions for further expansion. But of course, given that SOEs are government owned firms, restrictions may be circumvented to advance political goals.

Yet given the moderate gains exhibited by China’s equity markets on such development, investors must have remained cynical to the sustainability of China’s bailout policies.

Nevertheless surging bond yields have not posed as a burden to global stock markets in heavy anticipation of central bank steroids. In spite of Spain’s bailout, Spain and Italy’s bond yields soared[6].

A week’s action cannot be read as a sustainable trend, thus we must continue to observe how prices in various markets will react to China, as well as to the developments in Europe, particularly the Greece moment and in the US.

Many have crowed about the bullish potentials of the US stock market through the reverse head and shoulder pattern, which they think may have a spillover on the Philippines.

As I pointed out in the past, patterns don’t make prices, people’s actions do.

It will be actions of central bankers that will determine the directions of the marketplace rather than chart patterns. I pointed out last year that the death cross in the US S&P 500 in August of 2011 signified a false alarm[7] (false positive error) and was eventually validated four months after[8].

So far, US money supply M2 seem not supportive of a sustained rise by the S&P 500 owing possibly to the US Federal Reserve’s offsetting of the “flight to safety” inflows coming from the EU and from the closure or winding up operations of Operation Twist as discussed last week[9].

It would likely take the FED another ramping up of their balance sheet expansion to rekindle the monetary accommodation.

So the bullish chart pattern may play out its trend if the Fed will ease further, otherwise, the chart pattern will likely fail.

Buy the Rumor, Sell the News

Global financial markets have relied heavily on the “buy the rumor” from central banking rescues.

These are likely to have two short to medium term outcomes.

One, if central bankers FAIL to deliver in accordance to market’s expectations, then we will likely see another huge bout of downside volatility in global equity markets.

The Phisix, whom has not been immune to contagion, may breakdown its recent support level at 4,863, a level which represents nearly 10% from the peak. But a breakdown may not necessary lead to a bear market.

Yet such market turmoil may likely serve as fulcrum for the next batch of intensive interventions. Nevertheless, under such conditions, it would be best to wait and see until volatilities in the financial markets (stocks, commodities, bonds) subside, before considering to reposition.

On the other hand, if markets may be temporarily satisfied with REAL actions of central banks (e.g. $1 trillion bailout) then we should see a minor or a slight “sell on news”. But this should be seen as opportunities to RE-ENTER the markets incrementally.

Of course, the direction of gold prices, as well as, prices of general commodities, will serve as crucial indicators in determining the strength of the trend.

While gold’s price trend has significantly improved, there have been little signs of progress in the oil market (WTIC) and the general commodities (CRB).

Finally as caveat, I would like to reiterate that should markets continue to rise in ABSENCE of REAL actions from central bankers, we cannot rule out that the markets could fall like a house of cards (fat tail risks) or what I would call a Dr. Marc Faber event[10].

The market’s deep addiction to stimulus will eventually seek REAL stimulus more than just promises or in central bank lingo, signalling channel. Reversal of expectations can become violent.

As a side note, I find it ridiculous for people especially so-called experts to assert that today’s problems have been caused by lack of confidence, as if confidence has been randomly determined, and not in reaction to changes in the environment or in response to interactions with people. People have been not confident with the markets because of the persistent problem of insolvency and price artificiality and price distortions from political meddling. It’s a severe mistake to interpret effects as THE cause.

Bottom line: Global financial markets, including the Phisix, remains in a state of limbo. Uncertainty still governs. Under current conditions, the best guiding principle would be; patience is the better part of valor.

---

[1] See Expect a Continuation of the Risk ON-Risk OFF Environment, June 11, 2012

[2] See Central Bankers Talk Doom, Markets Surge, June 16, 2012

[3] See Why Spain’s Bailout may NOT Work June 12, 2012

[4] See Talk Therapy boost US Markets, June 15, 2012

[5] See China’s New Loans Unexpectedly Surged in May, June 12, 2012

[6] Danske Bank, All eyes on Greek election June 15, 2012 Weekly Focus

[7] See How Reliable is the S&P’s ‘Death Cross’ Pattern?, August 14, 2011

[8] See US Equity Markets: From Death Cross to the Golden Cross, December 31, 2011

[9] See Expect a Continuation of the Risk ON-Risk OFF Environment, June 11, 2012

[10] See Dr. Marc Faber Warns of 1987 Crash if No QE 3.0, May 11, 2012

Quote of the Day: Failed and Failing States

Professor Michael S. Rozeff at the lewrockwell.com writes,

I like to use the ammunition provided by the statists themselves (or those who take states for granted) that discredits their own statism. For example, there is the "Failed States Index".

How many states are there in the world, and how many are failures or leaning toward failure, according to the people who devised this index? They assess 177 states. Of these, 124 are in the troubled categories (ALERT and WARNING). That's 70 percent! Here we have a great experiment at one point in time. We have 177 trials of the state as a way to organize, and we have 124 failed or failing or approaching failure. Among the Moderate and Sustainable categories (non-failed states) we have such wonderful states as Greece and Spain.

If instead we look at the performance of states across time, a century or two, we find huge and endemic failures almost everywhere we look in major countries: Russia, Japan, Germany, Italy, France, China, many eastern European countries, and even the United States (if we count, for example, the civil war as evidence of a gigantic failure). The U.S. has held together by force, not law. Is that what a non-failed state is supposed to mean? Many European states have failed time and again, as several world wars and hyperinflations demonstrate. Their current financial manipulations are new evidence of their failure, as are their high rates of unemployment.

70% of the world nations are considered as at the risk of becoming a ‘failed state’. That’s a great measure of political success.

Prof. Rozeff rightly points out that the today’s crisis affected EU nations have been categorized as moderate (non-failed states) which has not accurately reflect been on the failed state index (as this was based on 2011)

Yet, the increasingly dysfunctional political institutions of Greece would almost qualify her as a ‘failed state’.

As I recently wrote,

Instead, what a “failed state” means is that there is no standing government or that imposed government will mostly likely be ignored by society or what could be called “stateless society”.

I am not sure if Greece will technically become a failed state.

What is certain is that we are witnessing the accelerating collapse of a parasitical relationship anchored upon the spendthrift welfare and bureaucratic state.

Nonetheless this should be good news as Greece’s political economy would be compelled by nature to face economic realities; regardless of the outcome of today’s elections.

Oh by the way, despite all the cheering, drum beating and exaltation by media over the supposed political progress in the Philippines, the nation remains a candidate of becoming a failed state.

The Philippines has been ranked 51^st and classified as in “warning” conditions.

I’d say that the Philippines has more characteristics of a failed state: 40+% of the domestic economy are considered as informal. OFWs, whom has been labeled as heroes, are in reality symptoms government failure due to the lack of economic opportunities and depressed standards of living. Yet these combined forces which operates outside of government spectrum, has been delivering the real progress, but whose credit has been usurped by politicians and by mainstream media and institutions.

Yes, there have marginal improvements from 2010, but this could be seen on a relative perspective—perhaps more states have been performing far worst than the Philippines than the Philippines doing better.

Information Age Education: Student Focused Online Platforms

The information age will massively disrupt (20th century classroom mass based) education as we know of it today.

Hedge fund manager Andy Kessler in his interview with Artificial Intelligence expert Sebastian Thrun, published at the Wall Street Journal, gives us some clues. (bold highlight mine)

Yet there is one project he's happy to talk about. Frustrated that his (and fellow Googler Peter Norvig's) Stanford artificial intelligence class only reached 200 students, they put up a website offering an online version. They got few takers. Then he mentioned the online course at a conference with 80 attendees and 80 people signed up. On a Friday, he sent an offer to the mailing list of a top AI association. On Saturday morning he had 3,000 sign-ups—by Monday morning, 14,000.

In the midst of this, there was a slight hitch, Mr. Thrun says. "I had forgotten to tell Stanford about it. There was my authority problem. Stanford said 'If you give the same exams and the same certificate of completion [as Stanford does], then you are really messing with what certificates really are. People are going to go out with the certificates and ask for admission [at the university] and how do we even know who they really are?' And I said: I. Don't. Care."

In the end, there were 160,000 people signed up, from every country in the world, he says, except North Korea. Rather than tape boring lectures, the professors asked students to solve problems and then the next course video would discuss solutions. Mr. Thrun broke the rules again. Twenty-three thousand people finished the course. Of his 200 Stanford students, 30 attended lectures and the other 170 took it online. The top 410 performers on exams were online students. The first Stanford student was No. 411.

Mr. Thrun's cost was basically $1 per student per class. That's on the order of 1,000 times less per pupil than for a K-12 or a college education—way more than the rule of thumb in Silicon Valley that you need a 10 times cost advantage to drive change.

So Mr. Thrun set up a company, Udacity, that joins many other companies attacking the problem of how to deliver the optimal online education. "What I see is democratizing education will change everything," he says. "I have an unbelievable passion about this. We will reach students that have never been reached. I can give my love of learning to other people. I've stumbled into the most amazing Wonderland. I've taken the red pill and seen how deep Wonderland is."

"But Wonderland is also crazy!" I interrupt.

"So?"

Ah, another Thrun project that can radically disrupt the old way of doing things. "But isn't that exactly what we should be doing? I'm going part-time at Google to pursue this. I really care. Isn't this the American history? Can't you pinpoint almost everything that happened back to some technological breakthrough?" Indeed, this is going to disrupt public schools and teachers unions and universities and tenured professors and so on, Mr. Thrun effectively interjects: "The dialogue always focuses on what's going to happen to the institutions. I'm totally siding with the students."

I ask why he always takes on these quantum changes instead of trying something incremental. "That's what Google taught me. Aim higher. Udacity is my playground—to radically experiment and find out. I've seen the light."

Education in the information age will see a deepening trend towards personalized (demassified) learning, will focus on job related skill building (which does away with useless subjects aimed at indoctrination) and on increasing specialization.

Continues innovation, competition and noncontiguous platform which should cover the entire world (in terms of providers, educators and students), will become important forces in driving down the cost, or the “democratization” of education.

Finally, job hiring based on the education credential system model will be challenged, if not transformed to meet the new digital realities.

Explore Sebastian Thrun's Meet Udacity website here.

China’s Middle Class Support Demand for Gold

From Mineweb.com

The rise of China's middle-class is helping support demand for gold in the country. China, the largest producer of gold, is set to become the biggest consumer of the metal in 2012, with a significant proportion of luxury purchases in China veering towards gold accessories, bought by middle-class aspirational consumers.

By 2020, 25% of China's population is expected to be middle-class, creating great consumption demand. Diamond studded luxury items and gold watches are seeing `blow-out like demand' from wealthy shoppers in China, who are snapping up these expensive accessories to make a fashion statement, give as business gifts or just collect.

What also augurs well this year is that middle-class wealth is expected to spread to 600 million people in third-tier Chinese cities, with a sizeable percentage investing in gold or buying gold jewellery.

For a country whose gold production in the first four months of 2012 reached 109.6 tonnes, up 6.13% from the same period last year, passion for the yellow metal has scaled new heights.

Total retail sales of gold, silver and jewellery in China amounted to $2.82 billion in May, up 18.2% compared to the same period last year, according to the National Bureau of Statistics of China. Accumulative retail sales of the segment in the first five months of 2012 reached $14.6 billion, up 16.1% compared to the same period last year.

In May, the country's overall retail sales of consumer goods including gold, silver and jewellery totalled $262 billion, up 13.8% year-on-year at nominal growth rates. The real growth rate was 11%, data showed.

The jewellery sector in China has become a hot spot fuelled by surging investment demand for gold and precious stones. Jewellery retailers registered a 42% increase in sales last year, driven by consumers' taste for gold and gemstone-encrusted jewellery. Reports indicate that these jewellers are looking beyond traditional markets, eager to dig into the pockets of the newly rich middle-class in smaller cities.

For some time now, the country's growing middle-class has been pursuing a quality of lifestyle that includes appreciation for exquisite fine jewellery. And, retail jewellery chains are expanding to smaller cities and districts to keep up with demand.

Statists have always made the point that paper money has been the popular choice. But appeal to popularity premised on free lunch or Santa Claus politics cannot and will not supplant economic reality.

Today’s crisis have been manifestations of the unraveling of such unsustainable institutional arrangements.

Statists also say that people will have difficulty over adjusting or accepting to the return of gold as money. Maybe for the people of the West this may hold some substance. The intellectual elite may have successfully indoctrinated upon the public to accept the ideology that gold is a “barbaric metal” and where free lunch politics have promoted and embedded to their lifestyles the creed that “debt based spending is the path to prosperity” through government’s cartelized banking system.

But this certainly is far from reality for most of Asia such as China, India, Malaysia or Vietnam. The rate of growth of gold’s demand by China’s middle class looks like a testament to these.

In other words, should a global currency crisis emerge, then Asians are likely to reform their respective monetary system faster than that of the West. But that would be just a guess.

Yet it is unclear if prospective monetary reforms will include gold. But chances are increasing that gold may be part of it.

Global central banks have been accumulating gold at a faster rate led by Asia.

From Reuters.com

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) noted in its June 2012 Quarterly Review that "central bank balance sheets in emerging Asia expanded rapidly over the past decade because of the unprecedented rise in foreign reserve assets" Reserves rose from $1.1 trillion to $6.4 trillion in 2011.

This quote, which I earlier posted, attributed to Janos Feteke (who I think was the deputy governor of the National Bank of Hungary) looks apropos to the surging demand of gold from China’s middle class and to the micro versus macro debate on the return of the gold standard,

There are about three hundred economists in the world who are against gold, and they think that gold is a barbarous relic - and they might be right. Unfortunately, there are three billion inhabitants of the world who believe in gold.

What truly matters is to get monetary system out of government's hands or to depoliticize or denationalize (Hayek) money and allow for competition in banking (free banking), where gold standard may or may not be the accepted standard. Nevertheless sound money based on free markets.

Quote of the Day: Good Conduct is a Consequence of Freedom

Great part of that order which reigns among mankind is not the effect of government. It has its origin in the principles of society and the natural constitution of man. It existed prior to government, and would exist if the formality of government was abolished. The mutual dependence and reciprocal interest which man has upon man, and all the parts of civilised community upon each other, create that great chain of connection which holds it together. The landholder, the farmer, the manufacturer, the merchant, the tradesman, and every occupation, prospers by the aid which each receives from the other, and from the whole. Common interest regulates their concerns, and forms their law; and the laws which common usage ordains, have a greater influence than the laws of government. In fine, society performs for itself almost everything which is ascribed to government.

That’s from Thomas Paine, English-American author, pamphleteer, radical, inventor, intellectual, revolutionary, and one of the Founding Fathers of the United States quoted from the Rights of Man Part 2, by libertarian author Sheldon Richman who aptly sums it up…

good conduct isn’t a precondition of freedom; it is a consequence of freedom

Central Bankers Talk Doom, Markets Surge

You’ve got to hand it central bankers for deftly using scare tactics to drive up the markets

This from a Bloomberg article entitled Central Banks Warn Greek-Led Euro Stress Threatens World

Central banks intensified warnings that Europe’s failure to tame its debt crisis threatens to roil the world’s financial markets and economy as Greece’s election in two days looms as the next flashpoint for investors.

Monetary policy makers from the U.K. to Japan and Canada sounded the alert about potential fallout from the single currency bloc’s troubles. They spoke as Group of 20 leaders prepare to meet in Mexico next week amid the weakest international economy since the 2009 recession.

A victory by Syriza, the party that promises to renege on Greece’s end of the bailout deal, could speed the nation’s exit from the euro. Absent a quick fix from divided European governments, central bankers may have to engage in fresh crisis- fighting of their own to ensure markets operate and their economies grow if the election jolts investors. Spain’s 10-year bond yield vaulted to 7 percent yesterday in a fresh sign of the stress that has plagued the region for two years.

The crisis has created a “large black cloud of uncertainty hanging over not only the euro area, but our economy too, and indeed the world economy,” Bank of England Governor Mervyn King said in London late yesterday.

‘Major Shock’

Canada faces a “major shock,” and global financial conditions could deteriorate significantly if Europe’s crisis worsens, the country’s central bank said yesterday. Bank of Japan (8301)Governor Masaaki Shirakawa said June 13 that the euro area poses the biggest challenge to the world’s No. 3 economy. The BOJ today kept monetary policy unchanged, while saying it will be giving “particular” attention to global market developments.

So when has DOOM become POSITIVE for markets? Well that’s when markets have been PROMISED to be defended with a tsunami of STEROIDS

Here are some examples:

Bank of England proposes £140 billion rescue plan

From the Telegraph

George Osborne unveiled a £140 billion emergency scheme to try to avoid a second credit crunch caused by the ongoing chaos in the eurozone.

The Bank of England is to offer money to high-street banks to kick-start mortgage and small business lending to prevent loans being rationed for many families and entrepreneurs, the Chancellor announced.

It comes after sharp rises in the costs of mortgages and other loans in recent months as banks struggle to raise money in the midst of the single currency crisis.

Bloomberg on last night’s positive reception of US markets on the alleged doomsday

Expectations for global policy action grew as central banks intensified warnings that Europe’s failure to tame its crisis threatens the economy. European Central Bank policy makers have overcome a key concern about taking the benchmark rate below 1 percent, two euro-area central bank officials said. The June 17 vote will turn on whether Greeks accept open-ended austerity to stay in the euro or reject the conditions of a bailout and risk becoming the first to exit the 17-member currency.

Fed Action

Stocks also rose on speculation the Federal Reserve may join central banks in taking steps to boost growth. Data today showed that industrial production unexpectedly fell and consumer confidence slid, adding to evidence of U.S. economic weakness. U.S. policy makers meet June 19-20.

Of course, flooding the world with money would not be sufficient, central bankers would need to ensure an easing of regulatory conditions to make the credit environment conducive, e.g. lighten up on collateral requirements

From Marketwatch.com

International regulators are on the verge of easing new banking rules that are meant to help the safety of the financial system, the Wall Street Journal reports, citing unnamed sources. Some of the regulators apparently worry that forging ahead with the new requirements could actually make the European financial meltdown worse, the newspaper noted. So, the new plan is to make it easier for the industry to comply with requirement that lenders keep on hand enough liquid assets to weather market plunges or other disasters.

To preserve the current system, central bankers should be expected to INTENSIFY the use of steroids—which do not really help anyway and actually worsen it—in order to postpone what is truly inevitable.

Today’s markets have increasingly been anchored or hostaged on expectations of huge infusions of steroids. This implies that FAILURE to please or satisfy such expectations would lead to tremendous or outsized volatilities.

Nonetheless central bankers have, in reality, been using the crisis to expand political control over their constituents

As the great libertarian H.L. Mencken once said,

The urge to save humanity is almost always a false-face for the urge to rule it.

Be very careful out there.

Chart of the Day: Greece’s ‘Macaroni’ Bureaucracy

From Bloomberg, (bold emphasis mine) [hat tip P. Ella]

Panagiotis Karkatsoulis, who works in the Greek Ministry of Administrative Reform and e-Governance and teaches at the National School of Public Administration, has some well founded theories about where Greece went wrong. One long-standing habit of government that helped the country become almost unmanageable, according to Karkatsoulis, is its disdain for parliament: new rules and regulations in Greece have long been created by ministerial order and presidential decree rather than through parliamentary process.

About 70 percent of regulations were approved directly by ministers between 1975 and 2005, and just 2 percent were the result of parliamentary actions, Karkatsoulis says in this OECD presentation. Regions, prefectures and the president account for the remaining rule changes. More than 30 years of scant coordination has resulted in a morass of contradictory rules and a lack of legal clarity.

A profile of Karkatsoulis in Le Monde explains how the first government of George Papandreou in 2009 had 15 ministers, 9 vice-ministers and 21 adjunct ministers, along with 78 general or special secretaries, 1,200 counselors, 149 directorate generals and 886 directorates — this for a population of just over 11 million, or the same number of people as those living in Cuba. The resulting mesh of interdependencies for decision making has made governing Greece increasingly difficult.

The chart above from Mr. Karkatsoulis has been labeled as the ‘Macaroni’ chart.

This serves as a great example of how the Gordian Knot of arbitrary rules and regulations, which has been emblematic of a political economy built on an unsustainable parasitical relationship, ultimately ends up in a crisis.

Printing money via devaluation, as prescribed by the mainstream, will not solve the issue of excessive regulations, red tape and bureaucratic barnacles, as well as property rights, free markets and the rule of law.

More Wall of Worry: Rising Accounts of Protectionism

Another area to be concerned with is the reemergence of protectionism.

Writes the Wall Street Journal Blog,

As worries rise about an economic slowdown, major nations around the world are ramping up measures to protect their economies from trade threats.

Global Trade Alert, an independent monitoring group, says in a new report today that at least 110 new protectionist measures were implemented around the world since the Group of 20 advanced and developing economies met in France last November. Of those 110, 89 were by G-20 members, who meet again next week in Mexico.

Protectionist measures such as export restrictions and higher tariffs spiked after the 2008 financial crisis but didn’t subside afterward. Since then, nations have been pursuing stealthier measures — “murky protectionism” — to circumvent international trade rules, the group says.

The latest updated tally names the 27-member European Union as the leading culprit since November 2008, with 302 discriminatory measures, followed by Russia and Argentina with about half that number each. China ranked at the top of a list of “number of trading partners affected” — with 193, or nearly all of them, followed by the European Union at 187.

Bailout policies are a form of protectionism. And they protect certain domestic politically privileged interest groups at the expense of the consumer.

It has been the G-20 or developed nations (mostly the EU) that has initiated most or about 80% of protectionist measures.

This reveals of the state of their government’s growing desperation which aside from protectionism has resorted to various financial repression measures such as raising taxes, imposing capital controls, inflationism, negative interest rates, price controls and various regulatory proscriptions.

In addition, Russia and Argentina’s deepening slide to statism has also contributed to rising incidences protectionism.

China, as the report said, is likely to suffer most from the reversal of globalization or deglobalization. In reality, the whole world will suffer as economic doors close.

Unknown to many, the resurgence of protectionism is likely to provoke retaliatory responses which should lead to a deterioration in geopolitical relationships that increases the risks of military conflagration. The great depression of the 1930s paved way for World War II.

As the great Ludwig von Mises warned,

What is needed to make peace durable is a change in ideologies. What generates war is the economic philosophy almost universally espoused today by governments and political parties. As this philosophy sees it, there prevail within the unhampered market economy irreconcilable conflicts between the interests of various nations. Free trade harms a nation; it brings about impoverishment. It is the duty of government to prevent the evils of free trade by trade barriers. We may, for the sake of argument, disregard the fact that protectionism also hurts the interests of the nations which resort to it. But there can be no doubt that protectionism aims at damaging the interests of foreign peoples and really does damage them. It is an illusion to assume that those injured will tolerate other nations' protectionism if they believe that they are strong enough to brush it away by the use of arms. The philosophy of protectionism is a philosophy of war. The wars of our age are not at variance with popular economic doctrines; they are, on the contrary, the inescapable result of a consistent application of these doctrines.

Desperate politicians and their cronies would use every trick on their books to preserve their privileges, mostly in the cover of nationalism, that comes at the expense of long term interest of their constituents.

Nationalism serves no more than a ruse conjured by politicians and those of the political order to justify social controls.

I hope and pray that the growing trend of protectionism will be curbed and that wars will be avoided.