Q4 and 2024 GDP: Consumer and Capital Spending Stagnates as Bank-GDP Concentration Risks Deepen

  

The government pretends to be endowed with the mystical power to accord favors out of an inexhaustible horn of plenty. It is both omniscient and omnipotent. It can by a magic wand create happiness and abundance. The truth is the government cannot give if it does not take from somebody—Ludwig von Mises 

In this issue

Q4 and 2024 GDP: Consumer and Capital Spending Stagnates as Bank-GDP Concentration Risks Deepen

I. The GDP’s Critical Defects

II. The Mainstream Narrative is Failing

III. Philippine GDP Predicament: Full Employment and Record Credit, Yet Slowing Consumption?

IV. Malinvestments: Retail Expands While Consumer Spending Stagnates

V. Proposed Minimum Wage Hikes to Compound Consumer Woes

VI. Q4 GDP versus SWS’ Q4 Milestone Highs in Self-Poverty Ratings and Hunger; Critical Questions

VII. Q4 GDP Boosted by Government Spending, Services Exports and Private Sector Construction

VIII. Q4 GDP’s Industry Side: Boost from Public Administration and Defense and other Related Sectors

IX. Q4 2024 Boosted by Financialization Even as Manufacturing and Real Estate Sector Languish; Deepening Bank-GDP Concentration Risks

X. More Signs of Consumer Weakening: Material Slowing ‘Revenge Travel’ and Outside Dining GDP

XI. Summary and Conclusion

Q4 and 2024 GDP: Consumer and Capital Spending Stagnates as Bank-GDP Concentration Risks Deepen 

Q4 and 2024 GDP were another big miss for the establishment. Government spending played a pivotal role in boosting growth, while consumers were sidelined. There is little awareness that the former indirectly causes the latter 

I. The GDP’s Critical Defects 

Inquirer.net January 31, 2025: The Marcos administration missed its growth target for the second straight year in 2024, falling below consensus after the onslaught of destructive typhoons had muted the typical surge in economic activities during the holiday season. Gross domestic product (GDP), the sum of all products and services created within an economy, expanded at an average rate of 5.6 percent for the entire 2024, the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) reported on Thursday…At the same time, last year’s performance failed to meet market expectations after settling below the median estimate of 5.8 percent in an Inquirer poll of 12 economists…The statistics agency reported that GDP had expanded by 5.2 percent in the fourth quarter, unchanged from the preceding three months and lower than the year-ago print of 5.5 percent. That was also below the median forecast of 5.8 percent. 

Our preface: the BSP cut official rates in August, October, and December. It also reduced RRR rates in October, while the aggregate fiscal spending in 11-months reached all-time highs (ATHs), signaling massive stimulus or Marcos-nomics. 

Despite this, the Philippine GDP registered 5.2% in Q4 and 5.6% in 2024. 

Although GDP provides insight into how economic output is distributed across sectors—categorized by expenditure and industry—it does not present the equivalent allocation of spending by income class. 

Therefore, it is arguable that the headline figure makes a critically flawed assumption by suggesting that the statistical spending growth applies to the average. 

In other words, it assumes that the average citizen has experienced 5.2% growth in Q4 and 5.6% growth overall. The question, however, is how do you aggregate the spending of a few billionaires with that of those living in poverty? 

And this applies to the inflation deflator used to calculate the headline figure as well: How accurate is it to derive an average inflation rate from a mishmash of diverse spending items like a mobile gaming subscription, rice, and vehicle wheels? 

Apples and oranges, you say? Exactly.

If the nominal GDP and the deflator are flawed, why should we trust that the headline estimates reflect reality?

II. The Mainstream Narrative is Failing 

Every start of the year, mainstream experts proclaim at the top of their lungs that GDP will align with sanguine government targets. Some even tout the likelihood of the economy reaching "middle-income status."

Beyond abstract reasoning, they rarely explain the mechanics of how they arrive at their estimated figures.

Either they ignore the data provided by the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), or their forecasts are based on a 'pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey' approach—bluntly put, faith in magic.

What does the PSA data reveal?

Figure 1

It shows that since the post-pandemic recession, GDP has operated within a secondary trendline. This means that despite occasional growth spikes, GDP growth will be SLOWER than in the pre-pandemic era. (Figure 1, topmost pane)

Using the exponential trend as a gauge, we see that Q4 GDP consistently exceeds the trendline but eventually retraces to the secondary support in the following quarters.

The same dynamic applies to the 2024 GDP. (Figure 1, middle graph)

The point having been made, realize that for GDP to meet the mainstream's numbers, it would require a significant breakthrough not only to reclaim the pre-pandemic trend but also to sustain it.

From a statistical standpoint, none of this is happening. Even the PSA’s chart reinforces the notion of a slowing GDP. (Figure 1, lowest chart)

Figure 2 

As evidence, the government has struggled to wean itself off debt-financed pandemic deficits relative to GDP, which have served as a quasi-stimulus. Data reveals that they have become addicted to it. (Figure 2, topmost image) 

Why, then, do they yearn for pre-pandemic GDP figures? 

Incredible.

Statisticians-cum-economic experts often don't disclose that their perpetually optimistic forecasts might be about placating or bootlicking the government.

Why? For business and personal reasons. They might want to secure government contracts, underwrite debt issuance, intermediate stock trading, or gain accreditation as credit appraisers, among other things. On a personal level, they seek social desirability or good standing with officials for career advancement (revolving door politics), off-table deals, etc. In short: the principal-agent dilemma.

Essentially, overstating GDP or understating CPI numbers, or the mainstream's erroneous forecasts, come with no consequences for them—they have no "skin in the game."

However, for many in the investing public, consensus projections guide corporate strategies or investments in financial markets.

It’s unsurprising, then, that in addition to distortions in capital goods pricing due to stock market mispricing, overly optimistic guidance often leads to “build-and-they-will-come” debt-fueled malinvestments.

Many also invest their hard-earned savings in financial markets (stocks or fixed income) in the hope of achieving real or inflation-adjusted positive returns, without realizing that their investments are silently transferring wealth to politically connected economic elites, who are absorbing unsustainable amounts of debt.

And remember the inflation spike of 2022? NONE of these experts saw it coming.

In clear words, forecasts based on the principal-agent problem will likely keep the public blind to the escalating risks of a crisis.

Here's an example:

Businessworld, January 24: PROPERTY developers in the Philippine capital need to enhance their market research and consider lowering condominium prices to address the current “mismatch” between available units and buyer demand, according to property analysts. “These overpriced condos aren’t matching with the existing buyers…There are so many buyers, as in we’re talking millions of buyers, but the issue is they cannot afford [a condo in Metro Manila] anymore” (bold added) 

The mainstream’s narrative is failing: Expect more to come. 

III. Philippine GDP Predicament: Full Employment and Record Credit, Yet Slowing Consumption? 

Let's conduct a brief investigation into the PSA's GDP data. 

The government's statistics are riddled with paradoxical figures.

First, the government claims that the employment rate (as of November) has reached nearly its highest level. (Figure 2, middle chart)

Curiously, with low savings, how have entrepreneurs managed to fund investments in real businesses, leading to near-full employment?

FDI numbers hardly support this. Despite a spike in October, the 10-month FDI flow was up by only 6.6%, with 68% of those inflows coming from debt. Debt inflows are no guarantee of “investment.”

The likely source of funds might be from banking loans. Over an 11-month period, consumer credit captured the largest share of the net increase in Universal-Commercial Bank loans at 23%, followed by real estate at 18.74%, electricity at 9.72%, and retail trade at 9.52%.

However, retail and agriculture, which account for the largest shares of the working population at 21.3% and 20% respectively, suggest a different story.

Next, fueled by credit cards and salary loans, consumer credit continues to grow at a breakneck pace, setting nominal records consecutively. (Figure 2, lowest graph)

Ironically, despite full employment and unprecedented consumer credit growth, Q4 2024 saw real consumer spending in GDP terms increase by only 4.7%, similar to Q2 and marking the second lowest since Q2 2011, excluding the period of the pandemic recession.

Stagnating household consumption was a key factor in pulling down the period's GDP.

Moreover, household GDP mirrored the deceleration in Q4 2024, with consumer per capita GDP growth at just 3.8%—the lowest since Q3 2017.

Important questions arise: 

-Where did all that record bank credit expansion go?

-How much of the consumer credit growth has been about refinancing existing debt?

-If productivity has been driving the GDP, why would a nation with full employment experience a sustained slowdown in household consumption?

In this context, government data on employment appears questionable.

IV. Malinvestments: Retail Expands While Consumer Spending Stagnates

Figure 3

What’s more, households are struggling with consumption, mainly due to the inflation tax, which continues to erode their spending power. At the same time, they are using leverage to maintain their lifestyles. As this occurs, retail GDP continues to outgrow consumer spending. (Figure 3, topmost window)

Partly due to the mainstream’s constant cheerleading, retail entrepreneurs are hopeful that the consumption slump will reverse soon, and so have been aggressively expanding capacity. Retail GDP grew by 5.5% in Q4 and has outpaced consumer spending in 3 of the last 4 quarters. (Figure 3, second to the highest image)

Or, to put it simply, because of the mainstream belief in the 'build it and they will come' dogma, supply continues to outpace demand.

V. Proposed Minimum Wage Hikes to Compound Consumer Woes

In the meantime, news reports that "the House Committee on Labor and Employment has approved a bill for a P200 across-the-board legislated wage hike."

Would this not function as a form of redistribution or a protective moat in favor of elite companies, at the expense of micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs)? How would this incentivize grassroots entrepreneurship when authorities are effectively raising the cost of doing business or barriers to entry?

How would minimum wage laws not negatively impact consumption and productivity while acting as a drain on savings?

Quoting economist Thomas Sowell, "Minimum wage laws play Russian roulette with people who need jobs and the work experience that will enable them to rise to higher pay levels." (Sowell, 2006)

VI. Q4 GDP versus SWS’ Q4 Milestone Highs in Self-Poverty Ratings and Hunger; Critical Questions

And there’s more. How does the 5.2% GDP square with polls showing record highs in consumer stress: "Self-Rated Poverty at 63%, highest in 21 years" and "December 2024 hunger was… at the highest level since the record high 30.7% during the COVID-19 lockdowns in September 2020"? (Figure 3, second to the lowest and lowest charts)

While the government touts the 5.2% GDP, SWS found that 63% of Filipino families rated themselves as "Poor," while "25.9% of Filipino families experienced involuntary hunger."

Simply put, this reflects popular sentiment about inflation: a vast majority of the population feels harried by the peso’s loss of purchasing power, and a quarter of them have actually experienced hunger.

Incredible.

So, who is overstating their data—SWS or the government?

Here’s the thing: If the GDP growth is based on unsustainable leveraging, what would the ramifications be?

Or if consumer balance sheets have been burdened by excessive gearing (spend-now, pay-later) to cope with inflation, how would this affect the economy?

When consumers reach the proverbial tipping point of leveraging and begin to scale down, wouldn't this slow the GDP? Wouldn't credit delinquencies rise, affecting the banks' already strained liquidity?

Or, wouldn’t this reduce lending, exacerbating liquidity pressures in the banking system and increasing defaults?

Could this not lead to rising unemployment, creating a feedback loop that slows GDP, decelerates bank lending, and drives up credit delinquencies?

By the same token, what happens to the supply side’s debt-financed overcapacity? Wouldn’t this worsen pressures on unemployment, output, consumer spending, and negatively affect the health of the banking industry?

Wouldn't increasing sentiments of hunger and perceptions of poverty not lead to higher risks of social disorder? 

VII. Q4 GDP Boosted by Government Spending, Services Exports and Private Sector Construction 

If household consumption weighed down the GDP, which sectors propelled it upwards?

Figure 4

From the expenditure side of the data, the answer is the government, construction, and export services. 

Government GDP rose from 5% in Q3 to 9.7% in Q4. While construction GDP dipped from 8.8% to 7.8%, it still exceeded the 5.2% threshold. Private sector construction, driven by households (12.8%) and corporations (5.7%), powered the sector’s GDP, while government construction GDP stagnated at 4.7%. (Figure 4 topmost diagram)

Interestingly, while exports of goods entered a recession, declining by -0.37% in Q3 and -4.6% in Q4, services exports GDP surged from 2.3% to 13.5%, elevating the sector's performance from -1.4% in Q3 to 3.2% in Q4. (Figure 4 middle image) 

Curiously, real estate services firm CBRE reported in 2024 that "32 percent of vacated (office) spaces are from the IT-BPM sector." Why have service export firms like BPOs been downsizing if their businesses were reportedly booming, as suggested by the GDP figures? 

Meanwhile, gross capital formation fell sharply from 13.7% in Q3 to 4.1% in Q4, while durable goods GDP also plunged from 7.9% to just 0.1%. Unfortunately, this indicates a sluggish state of investments, which contrasts with the employment data. 

The expenditure side of the GDP shows that government spending was primarily responsible for the Q4 GDP boost, supported by services exports and private sector construction. However, it also reveals that while consumer spending has stagnated, capital spending has languished. 

VIII. Q4 GDP’s Industry Side: Boost from Public Administration and Defense and other Related Sectors 

On the industry side, sectors like transport (9.5%), financial and insurance (8.5%), professional and business services (8.3%), public administration and defense (7%), education (6.2%), and health (12.1%) all grew above the GDP rate. 

Or, to put it another way, outperforming government and related sectors contributed about 10% of the industry's GDP. 

After the 2020 spike, the share of public administration and defense in GDP remains elevated compared to pre-pandemic levels. This should come as no surprise, as the government is focused on centralization, partly driven by a subtle shift toward a war economy. (Figure 4 lowest graph)

IX. Q4 2024 Boosted by Financialization Even as Manufacturing and Real Estate Sector Languish; Deepening Bank-GDP Concentration Risks

Figure 5

On the other hand, despite showing signs of a slight slowdown in Q4 2024, the financial and insurance sector's contribution to national GDP continues to expand. (Figure 5, upper chart) 

It's not coincidental that the sector's improvements coincided with the BSP's unprecedented sector rescue in 2020. Since then, the sector's growth has not looked back, even as the BSP raised interest rates. That is, the sector’s GDP suggests that there was no tightening at all. 

In Q4, banks accounted for 49% of the sector's GDP, while non-banks and insurance had respective shares of 32% and 13.33%. These sectors posted GDP growth rates of 8%, 8.4%, and 8.2%, respectively. 

Yet the paradox lies in the sector's dependence on the real economy, as it lends and invests to generate profits and contribute value to GDP. 

Real estate, trade (primarily retail), and manufacturing are among their largest borrowers, accounting for 40% of total bank lending as of last November. 

Lending to the financial sector itself accounted for a 7.7% share, which together with the aforementioned sectors, totals 48.5% of all bank loans (from universal commercial, thrift, and rural banks). 

Incidentally, these sectors are also significant contributors to the GDP, making up a 42.7% share of the national GDP. Including the financial sector, the aggregate GDP increases to 52.5%. 

Aside from retail, the manufacturing sector posted a real GDP growth of 3.1%, while real estate GDP materially slowed to 3.0%, pulling its share of the national GDP to an all-time low! (Figure 5, lower diagram) 

We previously discussed the sector's deflationary spiral, and the Q4 decline could signal further price drops in the sector. 

To illustrate the struggles of the manufacturing sector, JG Summit announced the shutdown of its Petrochem business last week, in addition to the goods export recession in Q4. 

To summarize, the Philippine GDP and bank lending exposure reveal an increasingly fragile economy heavily dependent on a few sectors, which have been buoyed by bank credit. This means that the higher the concentration risks, the greater the potential impact of an economic downturn. 

X. More Signs of Consumer Weakening: Material Slowing ‘Revenge Travel’ and Outside Dining GDP 

Another piece of evidence that consumer spending has been slowing can be found in the food and accommodation sectors' GDP. 

The authorities' response to the pandemic with economy-wide shutdowns initially pushed Food GDP into an upward spiral, while the reopening triggered a "revenge travel" GDP surge in the accommodation sector. 

However, the massive distortions caused by these radical political policies have started to unwind.

Figure 6

Accommodation GDP slowed from 12.2% in Q3 to 8.7% in Q4, while food GDP dropped from 10.1% to 4.9%. Since food accounts for a large portion (68%) of the sector, the overall GDP for the sector moderated from 10.7% to 6.1%. (Figure 6, topmost and middle charts) 

The distortions caused by pandemic policies have led many investors to believe that the 'revenge travel' trend, or the recovery streak in tourism, will continue, fueling massive investments in the sector. 

In our humble opinion, they have critically misread the market, as the growth rate of foreign tourist arrivals has substantially slowed in 2024. (Figure 6, lowest image) 

Moreover, the sector's declining GDP further highlights the weakening of domestic tourism. 

XI. Summary and Conclusion 

1 Q4 and 2024 have reinforced the secondary trendline in GDP, continuing to show a slowdown in GDP growth.

2 Dwindling consumer spending has been a critical factor driving this slowdown.

3 Importantly, capital spending growth has also been lackluster.

4 Conversely, government spending has provided crucial support to GDP, along with contributions from other ancillary sectors.

Yet, these dynamics reveal that the Philippines operates under the flawed assumption of political "free lunches" — where government spending is seen as having only a positive impact, while ignoring the negative effects of the crowding out syndrome. 

They also highlight the pitfalls of the BSP's 'trickle-down' policies, which have deepened concentration risks due to the bank-dependent financing of a few sectors. 

It’s no surprise, then, that after the initial easing by the BSP in the second half of the year — which contributed to the dismal Q4 GDP, the January 2025 PSEi 30 crash and rising bond yields, the BSP proposes to continue the same strategy, slashing rates by 50 basis points and reducing reserve requirements by 200 basis points. 

Succinctly, they are "doing the same thing and expecting different results."

____

references 

Thomas Sowell, A Glimmer of Hope August 08, 2006, realclearpolitics.com 

Philippine PSEi 30’s Crash: Worst January Performance Since 2008 and Asia’s Laggard — A Liquidity-Driven Meltdown?

The stock market's job is to always make you feel like you are missing out on something. The stock market's job is to always make you feel like you should be doing something. The stock market's job is to get you to do the wrong thing at the wrong time—Ian Cassel

In this issue 

Philippine PSEi 30’s Crash: Worst January Performance Since 2008 and Asia’s Laggard — A Liquidity-Driven Meltdown?

I. A Lowly Voice in the Wilderness

II. January as Template for 2025 Performance

III. Double Top Pattern?

IV. Was The Selloff Driven By Escalating Liquidity Strains? San Miguel: The Canary in the Coal Mine?

V. Price Distortions from the Changes in PSE’s Membership Amplified the Market’s Volatility

VI. Summary and Conclusion

Philippine PSEi 30’s Crash: Worst January Performance Since 2008 and Asia’s Laggard — A Liquidity-Driven Meltdown?

The Philippine equity benchmark plummeted 10.2% in January, making it the worst performer in Asia. It was also the largest loss in the history of January since 2008. Could escalating liquidity strains be the driving force?

I. A Lowly Voice in the Wilderness 

First, the appetizer. 

Let’s revisit a few quotes from our previous posts when everyone was predicting a new bull market for the PSEi 30, with expectations of it reaching 7,500 in October. (bold and italics original) 

In the backdrop of lethargic volume, concentrated activities, and a rising share of foreign participation, a continuation of global de-risking and deleveraging translates to more liquidations here and abroad, which could expose many skeletons in the closet of the Philippine financial system. August 4, 2024 

...

The public has been largely unaware of the buildup of risks associated with pumping the PSEi 30, driven by a significant concentration in trading activities and market internals 

The market breadth exhibits that since only a few or a select number of issues have benefited from this liquidity-driven shindig, the invested public has likely been confused by the dismal returns of their portfolios and the cheerleading of media and the establishment. September 15, 2024

... 

Bottom line: The levels reached by the PSEi 30 and its outsized returns attained over a few months barely support general market activities, which remain heavily concentrated on the actions of the national team and volatile foreign fund flows.  

Instead, the present melt-up represents an onrush of speculative fervor driven by the BSP’s stealth liquidity easing measures, even before their rate cut. Moreover, real economic activities hardly support this melt-up. October 7, 2024 

...

Given the current global and domestic economic imbalances, the Year of the Snake may again usher in another period of heightened risk and potential volatility. January 19, 2025 

Next, the main course.

II. January as Template for 2025 Performance

The Philippines' main equity benchmark, the PSEi 30, plunged by 4.01% on the last trading day of January, dragging its weekly return to -6.9%, marking its fourth consecutive week of decline.

Figure 1

For the month, the PSEi 30 suffered a 10.2% loss Month on Month (MoM), its most significant monthly decline since the 12.8% crash in September 2022. Annually, it was down by 11.8%.

January is supposed to be the best month for the PSE, rising 9 times in 13 years, with an average return of 0.94%, including 2025.

Yet, returns have been declining both monthly and annually for the past decade and so. (Figure 1, upper window) 

True to the volatility of the Snake Year, 2025's 10.2% plunge on January 10 was the worst since 2008, during the Great Financial Crisis, which resulted in a 48% decline and the lowest PSEi 30 level since 2012. (Figure 1, lower image) 

Yet, if history were to rhyme, and if January’s performance serves as a template for 2025, it wouldn’t be surprising if the PSEi 30 faces a substantial setback.

Figure 2

As a result of this week’s thrashing, the Philippine PSEi 30 was the worst-performing Asian bourse. Ten of 19 national indices were down, one remained unchanged, with average returns at -0.41%. (Figure 2, topmost graph)

For January, with 10 of 19 national indices down and a YTD change of -0.5%, the Philippine PSEi 30 was the region's laggard. (Figure 2, middle chart)

Major ASEAN bourses, such as Thailand’s SET and Malaysia’s KLCI, were the weakest links in both weekly and monthly outcomes. (Figure 2, lowest diagram)

Could these be emerging signs of an Asian Financial Crisis 2.0?

III. Double Top Pattern? 

This week’s meltdown breached two minor support levels and now seems poised to challenge the October 2022 low.

Figure 3

From a technical analysis standpoint, the PSEi 30 is facing the potential of a 'double top' pattern, where a breakdown below the October low could lead to a retest of the March 2020 level. (Figure 3, upper image)

The panic selling suggests that a significant oversold rebound might be imminent, though the durability of this recovery could be suspect.

IV. Was The Selloff Driven By Escalating Liquidity Strains? San Miguel: The Canary in the Coal Mine?

Mainstream explanations for the selloff have often been influenced by the availability bias or "when people overweight new information or recent events" (Investopedia)

Could the recent sell-offs be attributed to the substantial shortfall in Q4 and 2024 GDP (a development we had anticipated)? 

Was it influenced by Trump's tariff threats or the Federal Reserve's pause in their easing cycle? 

Or might domestic politics play a role? Specifically, the threat by the BBM administration to shut down the government if the Supreme Court rules in favor of appellants challenging the constitutionality of their controversial budget, or the impending Food Emergency Security measure on rice, set to be implemented on February 4, 2025. 

Our best guess is that while these factors might have some influence, a more critical driver of the market turmoil could be the escalating pressures on financial liquidity. 

Unlike the 2022 episode, where inflation and rising interest rates were significant factors, the current scenario mirrors the dynamics of the pandemic recession—where the PSEi 30 declines despite monetary easing aimed at combating a recession. (Figure 3, lower graph)

Currently, the GDP growth rate has been decelerating.

Figure 4

Moreover, bank liquidity has been worsening as of November, due to investments in Held-to-Maturity (HTM) assets and undisclosed Non-Performing Loans (NPLs). The cash-to-deposits and liquid assets-to-deposits ratios have been on a long-term downtrend, with the former at its lowest level in over a decade. (Figure 4, topmost graph) 

As a reminder, the BSP cut official rates in August, October, and December. It also reduced RRR rates in October, while the aggregate fiscal spending in 11-months reached all-time highs (ATHs), signaling massive stimulus. 

Contrary to mainstream expectations, the BSP’s accommodative monetary policy has led to an increase in Treasury bond yields rather than a decrease. (Figure 4, middle image) 

This rise is influenced not only by the Federal Reserve's policies but also by domestic inflation, which has been incrementally rising. 

Additionally, the yield curve for local Treasuries has steepened significantly, indicating heightened inflation risks. (Figure 4, lowest chart) 

Lastly, San Miguel’s deviation from the recent market uptrend might have served as the canary in the coal mine, signaling potential broader market distress. 

Also from last October 7, 2024 

Finally, SMC share prices continue to move diametrically opposite to the sizzling hot PSEi 30. (Figure 7, lowest graph)  

What gives? Will SMC’s debt breach the Php 1.5 trillion barrier in Q3?    

Have SMC’s larger shareholders been pricing in developing liquidity concerns? If so, why are bank shares skyrocketing, when some of them are SMC’s biggest creditors?

Figure 5

San Miguel’s share price was one of the biggest casualties, diving below the panic levels of March 2020.  (Figure 5, upper window) 

Its market capitalization plunged to Php 155 billion while grappling with a debt of Php 1.477 trillion. Falling equity and rising debt—what could go wrong? 

Could there be domestic funds facing liquidity constraints, forced to raise cash quickly by selling at any price?  And has this liquidation exacerbated San Miguel’s financial dilemma?

V. Price Distortions from the Changes in PSE’s Membership Amplified the Market’s Volatility

Lastly, the reconstitution of the PSEi 30 has contributed to market volatility.

The inclusion of AREIT and China Banking Corporation (CBC), which will replace Wilcon (WLCON) and Nickel Asia (NIKL) effective February 4, 2025, resulted in steep declines for the outgoing stocks: WLCON fell 10.16%, and NIKL plummeted 30.2%. (Figure 5, lower graph)

Meanwhile, funds tracking the PSEi 30 rotated into CBC (+33.81%) and AREIT (+4.74%).

Figure 6

Fundamentals hardly explain the irrational share price behavior of the affected firms. 

CBC’s parabolic move has turned it into a meme stock or crypto, even as the share prices of its peers have tumbled.

In the meantime, it also doesn't explain the sharp drop in NIKL's price. Although nickel prices have been on a downtrend, they have not collapsed. (Figure 6 topmost pane)

Shares of competitors FNI and MARC were down 1.96% and 8.96%, respectively, WoW. (Figure 6, middle graph)

In short, the PSE's proclivity to chase top performers while discarding laggards has only amplified the price distortions within the PSEi 30. 

VI. Summary and Conclusion

The January 2025 meltdown has brought to light the deteriorating fundamentals underlying the Philippine financial markets and economy. 

This crisis is not isolated to the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE) but also resonates with some ASEAN counterparts. Could this be emerging signs of Asian Crisis 2.0? 

If historical trends of January and the volatility associated with the Year of the Snake are to repeat themselves, and if the double top pattern materializes, this suggests a significant deficit or loss for the PSEi 30 by the end of 2025. 

Could the recent turmoil in the PSEi 30 be indicative of escalating liquidity pressures among domestic fund managers? 

If this is the case, future stress could manifest in the treasury market and influence the US dollar-Philippine peso exchange rate $USDPHP. 

Certainly, given that the PSEi 30 has become heavily oversold, a notable rebound might be anticipated. However, this scenario presents not an opportunity for accumulation but rather for liquidation. 

Unless one is an expert in scalping, short-term trades involve significant risks (Figure 6, lowest chart)

Remember, cash remains the best defense against a bear market—whether through foreign exchange (FX) accounts or Treasury bills (T-bills).

___ 

Disclosure: The author holds a small position in NIKL as of the time of writing.

Trump's Inauguration: Declares War on Interest Rates; Philippine Peso Rallies, Treasury Yields Steepen, While PSEi 30 Lags Behind Asian Peers

 

Speculation is a name given to a failed investment and… investment is the name given to a successful speculation–-Edward Chancellor 

Trump's Inauguration: Declares War on Interest Rates; Philippine Peso Rallies, Treasury Yields Steepen, While PSEi 30 Lags Behind Asian Peers

In this issue

I. Year of the Snake: Trump’s Baptism of Fire:  Declares War on Interest Rates 

II. Asian Markets Embraces Trump’s Inaugural Risk-On Rally: Stronger Currencies, Falling Bond Yields, and Equity Gains 

III. Philippine Peso Rallies as the Philippine Raises in $3.29 Billion in Bonds, Yield Curve Steepens 

IV. The PSEi 30 Misses out on the Electrifying Surge in Global Risk-Taking Appetite; the January Effect and More on the Chinese Zodiac Cycle 

V. Will This Week's Q4 GDP Announcement Alter the PSEi 30's Pervasive Negative Sentiment? 

VI. PSE Activities: Financial Casino for the Big Boys 

VII. Foreign Selling Drives PSEi 30 Decline, Low Savings Contribute to Thin Market Volume and the Sunk Cost Fallacy 

Trump's Inauguration: Declares War on Interest Rates; Philippine Peso Rallies, Treasury Yields Steepen, While PSEi 30 Lags Behind Asian Peers

Trump 2.0 opens with a declaration of war against interest rates. Global and Asian markets cheer. The Philippine peso rallies, the Treasury yield curve steepens, while the PSEi 30 trails behind its Asian peers.

I. Year of the Snake: Trump’s Baptism of Fire:  Declares War on Interest Rates

Donald Trump kicks off his presidency with a bang. 

He fired his opening salvo against the U.S. Federal Reserve, demanding they slash interest rates and threatening to raise tariffs on OPEC members if they fail to lower oil prices. 

In a video message to the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, he stated(via Reuters): "I'll demand that interest rates drop immediately. And likewise, they should be dropping all over the world. I’m also going to ask Saudi Arabia and OPEC to bring down the cost of oil." (bold and italics mine) 

He also softened his stance on China, refraining from arbitrarily imposing tariffs.

Bloomberg/Yahoo Finance reported: "We have one very big power over China, and that’s tariffs, and they don’t want them," the U.S. leader told Fox News host Sean Hannity in an interview that aired Thursday in the U.S. "And I’d rather not have to use it. But it’s a tremendous power over China." (italics mine)

Either Trump’s advisors suggested that slashing interest rates could slow inflation, or, as we noted two days before the U.S. election, tariffs were seen as an instrument or tool for his trade policies, much like in Trump 1.0. 

Perhaps also, in recognition that ongoing wars contribute to supply disruptions and thus influence interest rates, President Trump suspended foreign aid for 90 days.

This move could apply pressure on both Ukraine and Israel in their pursuit of continued warfare or military objectives. The U.S. government has provided billions in financing and material support to sustain the conflicts in Ukraine (at least USD 69.5 billion according to the U.S. State Department) and Israel (USD 12.5 billion as reported by the Council on Foreign Relations).

If we are not mistaken, most of the critical actions taken during his first week were interconnected and could have been designed to curb inflation and lower interest rates. 

However, Trump has been notably reticent about addressing the snowballing deficit spending, which is currently at an all-time high. 

With the possibility of easy money in the air, U.S. and global markets celebrated Trump’s inauguration. The major U.S. equity benchmark, the S&P 500, hit a record high, while Bitcoin neared its all-time high, and the crypto market entered a hyper-volatile phase. The US oil benchmark, WTIC, fell 3.5% over the week. 

According to the Wall Street Journal, "The crypto industry eagerly awaited Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Now, it’s reeling after the president and first lady launched a pair of meme coins. Dubbed $TRUMP and $MELANIA, the tokens serve no economic purpose—their value is largely driven by internet meme popularity. Since their launch Friday night, the market cap of the president’s coin has surged to $8.4 billion, while the first lady’s token is valued at approximately $800 million, according to CoinMarketCap." (italics mine) 

Trump's ascension has ignited hyper-volatility in the crypto sphere, epitomizing the intensification of resource misallocation, symptomatic of an entrenched and deepening global speculative mania. 

Is this a sign of its terminal phase? 

Similarly, as stated last week, Trump’s administration, which begins in the Year of the Snake, "promises to be a period of intense geopolitical activity, where traditional alliances might be tested, and new power dynamics could emerge, all under the ambitious and often unpredictable deal-making leadership." 

Trump’s first week in office marked a baptism by fire for geopolitics, the global economy, and financial markets. 

Of course, one week doesn’t make a trend.

II. Asian Markets Embraces Trump’s Inaugural Risk-On Rally: Stronger Currencies, Falling Bond Yields, and Equity Gains 

How has all this affected Asia?

Figure 1

First, the U.S. Dollar Index $DXY fell by 1.8%, marking its largest weekly drop since November 2023, primarily due to a 2.2% gain in the euro $EURUSD.

The DXY, an index measuring the U.S. dollar's value against a basket of foreign currencies, fell from a two-year high. This drop might reflect overbought conditions or could be a relief countertrend activity spurred by Trump's actions. 

Despite this, the sinking dollar lifted all Asian currencies quoted by Bloomberg. The U.S. dollar weakened most against the Malaysian ringgit $USDMYR, Thai baht $USDTHB, and South Korean won $USDKRW. (Figure 1)

Figure 2

Next, the U.S. Treasury market hardly reacted to the dollar’s steep decline, with yields on 10-year notes falling only marginally. 

However, yields on most ASEAN treasuries dropped significantly, or ASEAN bond prices rallied strongly. The Philippines, in particular, mirrored its U.S. Treasury counterpart $TNX. (Figure 2)

Figure 3

Lastly, with the prospect of easy money, 13 of the 19 national indices in Asia closed the week higher, averaging a 0.73% return in local currency terms. Sri Lanka’s Colombo and Mongolia’s MSE both hit their respective all-time highs. Sri Lanka, Japan's Nikkei 225, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index were among the top performers for the week. (Figure 3, upper window) 

Rallies in Japan and Hong Kong benchmarks reached the resistance levels of their respective trading ranges. (Figure 3, lower chart) 

III. Philippine Peso Rallies as the Philippine Raises in $3.29 Billion in Bonds, Yield Curve Steepens

And what of the Philippines? 

Figure 4

Despite a strong rally among its regional peers, the USD-PHP exchange rate slipped by 0.56% week-over-week, largely due to a 0.7% rally on Friday. (Figure 4, topmost image) 

This comes amidst the National Government's successful $3.29 billion bond sale, which included U.S. dollar and euro-denominated bonds, some of which were sustainability-focused offerings. The funds raised are intended to help finance the government’s budget, according to Reuters and Interaksyon. 

Muted gains, despite significant U.S. dollar and euro inflows for Q1 2024? There could be more borrowings in the coming two months. 

For example, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) reported $3.21 billion in approved foreign borrowings for Q4 2024: "For the period from October to December 2024, the Monetary Board approved six (6) public sector medium- to long-term foreign borrowings, amounting to $3.21 billion. This is 3.35% (or $0.11 billion) lower than the $3.32 billion in foreign borrowings approved for the same period last year." (italics added) 

Approved loans have been on an upward trend since at least Q4 2022, with a notable spike in Q1 2023, followed by a dip in Q2 before continuing to trend higher. (Figure 4, middle diagram) 

These approved loans are part of the BSP’s external borrowings, meaning higher debt loads will result in higher debt-servicing costs, which include both principal repayment and interest expenses—exacerbating the Philippines’ US dollar "short" conditions. (Figure 4, lowest graph) 

Furthermore, National Government borrowings deposited with the BSP should contribute to the Gross International Reserves (GIR), though this represents "borrowed reserves" that require debt servicing. 

The focus on maintaining benchmarks to project an image of sound macroeconomics is, in reality, more of a façade.

Figure 5

Secondly, not only have Philippine treasury rates been climbing from the belly to the long end of the yield curve, but they have also been transitioning into a bearish 'steepener,' with short rates reflecting the BSP's insistence on continuing its easing cycle, which raises inflation risks. 

Unknown to the public, this may be linked to the administration’s proposed "food security emergency," which was initially scheduled for implementation on January 22nd but has since been delayed "due to non-transmittal of documents," or legal technicalities. 

Like Trump, local authorities aim to curb inflation through a combination of quasi-price controls and by injecting government reserves into the marketplace under the guise of a "food security emergency". 

However, this approach fails to address the demand component, which is evidenced by record-high bank lending, unprecedented levels of public sector spending resulting in all-time high public debt, and historically high nominal liquidity conditions. 

Moreover, it misunderstands the dynamic nature of human actions, where suppressing activity in one area can lead to complex, unpredictable "multiplier" feedback loops (or second to nth-order effects) that ultimately undermine the original intent or objective. 

The effort to suppress interest rates through the "food security emergency" reflects the administration’s entrenched belief in "free lunch" politics, which the markets have resisted. 

IV. The PSEi 30 Misses out on the Electrifying Surge in Global Risk-Taking Appetite; the January Effect and More on the Chinese Zodiac Cycle

The Philippine equity benchmark, the PSEi 30, missed out on the adrenalin-powered risk-taking appetite following Trump’s inauguration and his push for a return to a global free-money regime.

Among Asia’s 19 national indices, it was one of the six equity laggards—an outlier. 

The PSEi 30 fell by 0.88%, marking its third weekly drop and pulling down its year-to-date performance to -3.56% with only a week left in January. 

The "January effect" has traditionally dominated the PSEi 30’s first-month performance, with only three declines in the last 12 years (since 2013). (Figure 5, middle pane) 

While a strong January doesn't necessarily guarantee positive annual returns, historical data shows that after three negative Januarys—2016, 2020, and 2021—the market experienced negative annual returns. Therefore, if this pattern and correlation holds, a deficit in the PSEi’s performance this January could signal that the negative trend may persist through the year. 

Moreover, January's positive returns have been slowing over time. 

Still, when viewed from the perspective of the Chinese Zodiac cycle, which follows the lunar-solar calendar rather than the contemporary Gregorian calendar, the Chinese New Year typically falls between January 21 and February 20. 

Therefore, in this context, examining PSEi 30 returns for the Year of the Snake from February to February reveals heightened volatility with a downside bias emerges: +16.7% in 1989, -12.85% in 2001, and -4.4% in 2013. 

V. Will This Week's Q4 GDP Announcement Alter the PSEi 30's Pervasive Negative Sentiment? 

The Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) is scheduled to announce the Q4 and annual GDP figures on January 30.

In any case, the PSEi 30's weakness have emerged even before the GDP announcement. 

Historically, the week prior to the GDP release has typically resulted in positive returns, with twelve out of twenty pre-GDP weeks since 2020 showing gains. (Figure 5, lowest chart) 

On average, this has resulted in a 0.67% gain up to last week. 

That said, the PSEi 30 has suffered four consecutive negative performances in the past four pre-GDP weeks, which has weighed on its average returns amid a backdrop of slowing GDP growth.

VI. PSE Activities: Financial Casino for the Big Boys 

While the public often views the PSEi 30 as a barometer of the "market," it is important to recognize that only a few stocks drive its performance.

Figure 6

Despite the index’s recent losing streak, the top five market heavyweights still accounted for 51.7% of the index as of January 24, while the top 10 had a combined 74.1% free-float-adjusted weight. (Figure 6, upper image) 

This degree of concentration does not operate in isolation; the top 10 brokers accounted for 57.7% of this week’s trades, primarily driven by institutional brokers. 

The top 10 and 20 most traded issues made up 65.9% and 82.2% of main board volume, respectively. 

These figures highlight the concentration of trading activities among a limited set of entities, with minimal participation from retail investors and punters. 

Our humble guess is that PSE trades are dominated by third-party depository institutions like banks and other financial institutions, which constitute our "national team," operating under the indirect behest of the BSP to support the Philippine stock market. 

Since 2020, the steep bear market rallies of the PSEi 30 have been dominated by local financial institutions. 

Aside from the post-recess "afternoon delight" phenomenon, this explains the significant use of the pre-closing 5-minute floating period for both pumps and dumps (mostly pumps) to shape the PSEi’s end-of-day outcome. 

Apart from this, the establishment's embrace of "benchmarkism" or status signaling through market or economic symbols has been evident in the membership mechanics of the PSEi 30 composite.

The Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE) constructs the PSEi 30 not just to favor companies with strong price performance, but also to serve as a "moat for elite-owned and controlled firms," as we pointed out back in February 2023. 

The PSE announced changes in the PSEi 30 membership last week. It removed price laggards, including Wilcon Depot, from the downstream real estate services sector, and Nickel Asia from the nickel mining sector. 

They were replaced by AREIT, an Ayala-owned Real Estate Investment Trust, and the high-flying China Banking Corp (CBC), thereby expanding the Sy Group's influence with a second bank in the PSEi 30, effective February 3, 2025. (Figure 6, lower chart) 

Still, with low domestic savings to support stocks, foreign money flows play an instrumental role in determining the outcome of the PSEi and the PSE. 

It goes without saying that the recent sell-offs have resulted from foreign money outflows that have overwhelmed the low savings and insufficient use of credit by the 'national team' and local punters to support the index. 

VII. Foreign Selling Drives PSEi 30 Decline, Low Savings Contribute to Thin Market Volume and the Sunk Cost Fallacy

Figure 7

This week's net foreign selling of Php 1.9 billion accounted for 9.3% of gross volume. Over the last three weeks (YTD), net foreign outflows have represented 8.8% of the gross volume, which have coincided with the PSEi 30's breakdown from 6,529 in 2025. (Figure 7, topmost window) 

Although seventeen of the thirty issues closed the week lower, averaging a 0.92% decrease, the performance of the top 5-6 biggest market cap issues determined the 0.88% fall of the PSEi 30 based on free-float adjusted performance. (Figure 7, middle graph)

In short, gains from SM and BPI were insufficient to offset the declines of ICT, BDO, SMPH, AC, and ALI. 

The broader market sentiment was similarly fragile, with declining issues outnumbering advancing issues on all five trading days last week. Declining issues led by 86. This negative trend has been ongoing since the start of the year. 

On a sectoral basis, while SM led holding firms gained with 0.2%, the material declines of ICT (-3.46%) weighed on services (-2.02%), and SMPH (-3.05%) and ALI (-2.33%) pulled down the property sector (-1.99%). 

Once again, this downturn coincides with eroding volume. Main board volume slumped 21.14%, from Php 4.8 billion to Php 3.8 billion. (Figure 7, lowest diagram) 

Overall, with current "trickle-down" political-economic dynamics leading to an unparalleled savings-investment gap, the PSEi 30 would find scarce support from diminishing savings, accompanied by rising risks of debt-financed malinvestments. 

Despite support from the "National Team," which only compounds capital goods mispricing and amplifies resource malinvestments, this merely delays the inevitable: an unpalatable market clearing process or an unpleasant rectification of past mistakes. 

The first law of holes states, "If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging." Yet, the sunk-cost fallacy ensures that the mainstream will remain in vehement denial and persist in digging deeper.